Porfolio Architecture 2017 by Clemens Hochreiter

PORTFOLIO PROFESSIONAL & ACADEMIC ARCHITECTURAL WORK

DIPL. ING. CLEMENS HOCHREITER

PERSONAL INFORMATION first name surname adress

Clemens Franz Hochreiter BremerstraĂ&#x;e 66 10551Berlin Germany RĂźstorf 33 4690 Schwanenstadt Austria

date of birth place of birth

nationality sex marital status telephone e-mail hobbies

December 5th, 1987 Ried im Innkreis Austria Austria male living common law 0049 152 / 046 340 44 clemens.hochreiter@gmx.at travelling, mountainbiking, snowboarding, photography

SKILLS Languages

Computer Literacy

Level according to CEFR standards

German English Swedish Romanian

MODELLING

Rhino Grasshopper Autodesk Maya

RENDERING

Mental Ray VRay 2.0 Artlantis Render

A1 A1 A1 A1

A2 A2 A2 A2

B1 B1 B1 B1

B2 B2 B2 B2

C1 C1 C1 C1

C2 C2 C2 C2

CAD

ArchiCAD AutoCAD Vectorworks

ADOBE

Adobe Photoshop Adobe Illustrator Adobe InDesign Adobe After Effects

first language advanced spoken and written level basic level (A2 according to CEFR standards) rudimentary knowledge

ANALYSIS

Autodesk Ecotect Autodesk Vasari

OFFICE

Microsoft Office Apple iWork

EDUCATION October 2014 Oct. 11 - Oct. 14

July 2011 Oct. 08 - July 11

Graduate Master Studies Architecture Master Studies Architecture at the Faculty for Architecture at the University of Innsbruck, Austria

Graduate Bachelor Studies Architecture Bachelor Studies Architecture at the Faculty for Architecture at the University of Innsbruck, Austria

Sept. 12 - June 13

June 2007 Oct. 02 - June 07

Master Studies Architecture as an ERASMUS exchange student at the Lunds Tekniska Hรถgskola in Lund, Sweden

degree with the general qualification for university entrance Higher Technical Institute for building construction HTL1 Bau & Design in Linz, Austria

WORK EXPERIENCE OFFICES

Time: LPHs: Field:

GRAFT GESELLSCHAFT VON ARCHITEKTEN MBH, BERLIN 02/2015-CURRENT 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 CONCEPT DESIGN PLANNING ORGANISATION

Time: LPHs: Field:

GILBERT SOMMER ZT, INNSBRUCK 12/2013-01/2014 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 CONCEPT DESIGN PLANNING ORGANISATION

Time: LPHs: Field:

F2 ARCHITEKTEN ZT GMBH, SCHWANENSTADT 2007-2013 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 CONCEPT DESIGN PLANNING ORGANISATION

Time: LPHs: Field:

KLEBOTH LINDINGER DOLLNIG ZT GMBH, LINZ 08/2011-09/2011 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 CONCEPT DESIGN PLANNING ORGANISATION

OTHERS Time: LPHs: Field:

SCHMID HOLZBAU GMBH, SCHWANENSTADT 2003-2007 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 CONSTRUCTION WORK ON SITE

Time: Field: Description:

PRO MENTE OÖ, CLUBHAUS VÖCKLABRUCK 10/2007-06/2008 Fulfilling the mandatory civil service Working with clients of a facility for psychologically ill people and organisational work for the facility

ACADEMIC institut für experimentelle

architektur.hochbau

Time: Field: Description:

LEOPOLD FRANZENS UNIVERSITÄT, INNSBRUCK 10/2010-06/2014 Tutor and Assistant Lecturer Tutor: Organisation of Lectures, Graphical advertisement, Support in the daily routine of the department Assistant Lecturer: Teaching “Basics of Building Construction”, Responsible for exercises and grading

LEOPOLD FRANZENS UNIVERSITÄT, INNSBRUCK 09/2014 Lecturer Lecturer in a workshop series about digital design methods, tools and possibilities

Studyprojet Competition/ Design Planning

PROJECTS

SVALBARD, NORWAY Svalbard 78°N BERLIN, GERMANY Holzmarkt - in cooperation with GRAFT & Kleihues+ Kleihues The Wave - in cooperation with GRAFT

LINZ, AUSTRIA var. Competitions, esp. Schools - in cooperation with KLD

OSLO, NORWAY Viking Museum Oslo - in cooperation with GRAFT

UPPER AUSTRIA, AUSTRIA Haus SDV-H var. Single Family Homes - in cooperation with F2 INNSBRUCK, AUSTRIA Fugu - Angriff ist die beste Verteidigung - in cooperation with H. Ahmadian Neco & A. Topf Umbrückler Alm - in cooperation with SOMMER ARCHITEKTUR MARIBOR, SLOVENIA Bio(tro)nic Gardens - in cooperation with Gregor Loewit LAGO DI GARDA, ITALY La Varfalla Verde Hotel - in cooperation with GRAFT SPLIT, CROATIA Recultivating Intensities ISTANBUL, TURKEY City Store - in cooperation with GRAFT

STRALAUER ALLEE - WAVE Site: BERLIN, GERMANY Type: RESIDENTIAL, PREMIUM LIVING Size: 12.000M2 WFL. Client:PRIVATE Time: 12/2015-10/2016 LPHs: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Field: C O N C E P T DESIGN PLANNING ORGANISATION

änderung

datum

index

Legende

verdeckt

Estrich

OK Rohdecke

Dichtung

Mauerwerk

OK Fertigfussboden

darüber liegend Schacht

Dämmung

Schnittverweis

Holz

Stahlbeton

OK Fussboden

Hinweise Brandschutz: Qualität der Wände gemäß Brandschutzachten Symbol 2. Rettungsweg über Treppenhaus

Trockenbau

Ansichtverweis

ALLE AUßENWANDRADIENKONKAV: AUßENFASSADE = 0.85m ALLE AUßENWANDRADIENKONVEX: AUßENFASSADE =1.25m Die anderen Angaben beziehen sich auf die Fensterprofile

LEGENDE NUTZUNG DER RÄUME V: AR: S: W / K: Z: B:

VERTEILER ABSTELLRAUM SCHLAFEN WOHNEN / KÜCHE ZIMMER BAD

i a

Die Schnittlinie der Grundrisse liegt auf +1.10m OKFF. Diese Zeichnung ist ausschließlich zur Planung und als Informationsmaterial zu nutzen. Dieser Plan ist keine Ausführungsunterlage! Dieser Entwurf ist geistiges Eigentum des Architekten und urheberrechtlich geschützt. Vervielfältigungen und Weitergabe an Dritte erfolgt nur mit ausdrücklicher Genehmigung des Planverfassers. Bei Mißbrauch bleiben rechtliche Schritte vorbehalten.

Projektnummer

Planer

LPH

Bauteil

Plantyp

Nummer

Fortl. Nr. Gewerk Status

Index

5 8 7 A 5 1 3 G R D 0 0 X X F

Gesellschaft von Architekten mbH Heidestrasse 50 10557 Berlin Germany

T: +49 - (0)30 - 30 645 10 30 F: +49 - (0)30 - 30 645 10 334 e-post: berlin@graftlab.com

Bauwerk Stralauer Allee GmbH & Co. KG Würmstraße 55 82166 Gräfelfing Deutschland

Tragwerksplanung-Haustechnik: Happold Ingenieurbüro GmbH

architekt

T: +49 (89) 415595-0 F: +49 (89) 415595-29 e-post: info@bauwerk.de

bauherr

tel: +49(30) 8609060 e-post: Berlin@burohappold.com

Pfalzburger Strasse 43-44 10717 Berlin, Deutschland

fachplaner

587_Stralauer Allee 13 Stralauer Allee

projekt

13, 10245 Berlin

Grundriss Dachgeschoss

Top View H13

25.08.2016

leistungsphase

planinhalt

erstellungsdatum

A_0

Top View H14

index datum 1:100

blattformat

referenzplan

maßstab

Höhe ±0.00 entspricht 34,22 m ü NHN

änderung

datum

index

Legende

verdeckt

Estrich

OK Rohdecke

Dichtung

Mauerwerk

OK Fertigfussboden

darüber liegend Schacht

Dämmung

Schnittverweis

Holz

Stahlbeton

OK Fussboden

Hinweise Brandschutz: Qualität der Wände gemäß Brandschutzachten Symbol 2. Rettungsweg über Treppenhaus

Trockenbau

Ansichtverweis

ALLE AUßENWANDRADIENKONKAV: AUßENFASSADE = 0.85m ALLE AUßENWANDRADIENKONVEX: AUßENFASSADE =1.25m Die anderen Angaben beziehen sich auf die Fensterprofile

LEGENDE NUTZUNG DER RÄUME V: AR: S: W / K: Z: B:

VERTEILER ABSTELLRAUM SCHLAFEN WOHNEN / KÜCHE ZIMMER BAD

i a

Projektnummer

Planer

LPH

Bauteil

Plantyp

Nummer

Fortl. Nr. Gewerk

Status

Index

5 8 7 A 5 1 3 G R 0 0 0 X X F

Gesellschaft von Architekten mbH Heidestrasse 50 10557 Berlin Germany

T: +49 - (0)30 - 30 645 10 30 F: +49 - (0)30 - 30 645 10 334 e-post: berlin@graftlab.com

Bauwerk Stralauer Allee GmbH & Co. KG Würmstraße 55 82166 Gräfelfing Deutschland

Tragwerksplanung-Haustechnik: Happold Ingenieurbüro GmbH

architekt

T: +49 (89) 415595-0 F: +49 (89) 415595-29 e-post: info@bauwerk.de

bauherr

tel: +49(30) 8609060 e-post: Berlin@burohappold.com

Pfalzburger Strasse 43-44 10717 Berlin, Deutschland

fachplaner

587_Stralauer Allee 13

projekt

13 , 10245 Berlin

Stralauer Allee

Grundriss Erdgeschoss A_0 referenzplan

Groundfloor H13

planinhalt

25.08.2016 erstellungsdatum

leistungsphase

Höhe ±0.00 entspricht 34,22 m ü NHN

index datum 1:100

blattformat

maßstab

6th Floor H14

Bathroom B-03 Top View

The design of the two sister buidling is the gesture of one volume split in half and by the dynamics of water washed out courtyard. This big, open and organic shaped balconies and terraces on the interior yard offer a great view onto the Spree and the Molecular Man. Towards the street the facade is articulating a rather closed manner. To offer a view towards the water, parts of the facades are swinging out and offer small balconies as well. The topic of a cruise ship got implemented in numerous details and design elements - for example a 3-dimensional imprintof a sailing boat’s vessel and bathrooms which have a design led by the “Cruise Ship” topic.

Bathroom studies to translate Schnitt C1-1 the maritime topic into an architectual interior

Bathroom B-03 Perspective

Schnitt C2-2

Facade towards Stralauer Alle with triangular shaped projectin alcoves and balconies

HOLZMARKTECKWERK

Site: BERLIN, GERMANY Type: MIXED USE, HIGHRISE, WOOD CONSTRUCTION Size: 34.000M2 NFL. Client:ECKWERK GMBH Time: 02/2015-11/2016 LPHs: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Field: CONCEPT DESIGN PLANNING ORGANISATION

GREENHOUSES/ ROOF TERRACES TOWERS WITH ACTIVE, GREEN FACADES HOUSING RESIDENTIAL AND WORK SPACE

MOUNTAINPATH WITH ASSOCIATED HIGHLIGHT STATIONS ATRIUM ROOF COVERING THE SHARED MARKED PLACE

PLINTH FOR COMMERCIAL USE AND INFRASTRUCTURAL FACILITIES

FACADE ELEVATIONS TOWER 1

TOWER 1 FACADE MODULES

FACADE ELEVATIONS TOWER 2

TOWER 2 FACADE MODULES

FACADE ELEVATIONS TOWER 3

TOWER 4 FACADE MODULES

RECULTIVATING INTENSITIES

Site: SPLIT, CROATIA Type: MEDICAL FACILITY, SCIENCE, FICTION Size: XL Client:MASTER THESIS Time: 10/2013-10/2014 LPHs: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Field: CONCEPT DESIGN PLANNING ORGANISATION

RECULTIVATING INTENSITIES - A XENO-ORGAN BREEDING STATION masterthesis at the institut fĂźr experimentelle architektur.hochbau I october 2014 supervisor: Marjan Colletti Univ.-Prof., Dipl.-Ing., MArch., Dott.Arch., PhD, ARB. further information on http://issuu.com/clemenshochreiter/docs/recultivatingintensities_clemenshoc

The proposal for a design strategy is a system, which is addressed to the infrastructural aspects of the body and a hospital. The architecture of a hospital and the human body share a lot of similarities in terms of their topological structure, of their units and functional spheres. But still a human body, with all its requirements and capabilities, would look different, if it was planned by mankind from scratch because our human, rather rational, logically structured understanding of our environment distinguishes essentially from how evolution has evolved. Nowadays we have reached a level of understanding, where we are able to observe the smallest parts within our body, cultivating them and reproducing body parts in a semi-artificial way. Contrary to this development our way of constructing, organizing and in the end building hospitals made an evolution from an open and spacious agglomeration of buildings to a compressed, spatially structure out of boxes, perfectly nested into each other. Of course there are reasons for optimizing travel distances or reducing the footprint within an urban environment but by doing this, mostly the building itself lost architectural qualities.

Historical hospitals were a cluster of buildings with open spaces in between to offer enough fresh air and to prevent an outbreak of epidemics within the hospital. This allowed visual relationships, allowing to experience the architecture also from the outside of the building, created more open or rather closed spaces and made it easier to orientate in the set of buildings. This set of buildings were in some kind an array of organs, connected by a vascular system of paths. Every organ fulfilling a certain task is connected in a rather linear order to its predecessor and its successor. It is not about propagating a strictly linear way of organization, but modern hospitals with their requirement of multi use of spaces, even though they are path wise almost perfectly planned, produce a lot of back and forth as well as cross traffic. Compared to our body, the only thing which enters and exits our body through the same way is the air. All other substances we bring into our body get modified, used, filtered and discharged in a linear way. The backside of the medal of this multi use architecture, which implies somehow a repetitive box type of planning, is a bad architectural articulation in terms of identity whereas in the human body there is nothing like a repetition. But through mutation and modification of cells, an adaptation to different functions and demands is possible. Another point of critique of modern clinics is that they work with one of the most efficient, complex, adaptable and at the same time delicate and vulnerable organism we know and not even consider to somehow showing how they work or how the building works. The proposal for an architectural articulation of a clinic for organ transplantation tries to liberate the built thing from its

HEATING/ COOLING HEATING/ COOLING BACK FLOW ELECTRICITY

OUTER SHELL PATIENT’S ROOM

INNER SHELL PATIENT’S ROOM

VENTILATION INERT GASES SEWAGE SUN SHADING PANELS

STATICAL STRUCTURE

corset of strictly functional, organizationally requirements. Similar to the human body, it should act and be stimulated by intensities, flows and movements. Creating a circulation system of supply, use, filtration and removal which still allows an interlocked acting between the functional units, the protagonists, the organs. Freed from an architectural modularity, open spaces in between provide visual connections, easy orientation and let one experience the architecture. Different densities of intensities, different speeds and separation of flows will be articulated. Not only circulation paths but also everted infrastructure will make it possible to distinguish certain parts by transferring the development of understanding our body into an understanding of architecture. Like under an electron scan microscope the delicate architecture should be perceived with all its layers and its complexity in a high resolution, in High Definition.

PATIENTS’ ROOMS The further one moves to the eastern end of the building, a change of its embracing structure is visible. The infrastructural pipes are branching out to supply the patients’ rooms with all necessities and so does the statical system. The rooms themselves are organized in modules - one module houses two rooms. The rooms are arranged around central roofed yards being connected to the rest of the building via a plug-in gate. Every single module has its own statical structure which carries the load of it. The infrastructure is extended from the buildings skin onto the modules where it intrudes into the shell through defined ports. So the entire section of the building for the patients consists out of cells being placed within a scaffold of statical and infrastructural elements. Just by the formation of elements one can read the rough shape of the building and is able to assume which cell could fit into the scaffold. The interior is designed in a rather clean and reduced manor in order to create a calm atmosphere. Through the combination of slik and shiny materials, the room provides both, a cozy ambience as well as the feeling of being in an secure, neat place.

GREEN FACADE

ELEVATION SOUTH

The new built architecture in an existing environment - especially with an extraordinary appearance can be described as an alien element. Similar to a 3D-printed medical implant which gets planted into a human body, the architecture becomes used by the existing vegetation as growth support. The natural environment takes over the implanted structure and adopts it into its system. By growing together the alien becomes a part of the existing system enhancing qualities already being there bringing in new possibilities.

FLOORPLAN LEVEL+2 1_500

This hybrid facade describes a symbiosis between the building and the surrounding nature. Besides concealing the buildings mass volume, allowing the greenery to expand onto the buildings structure brings some further benefits to building as the plants are acting as shading elements and greenery supports the patientsâ&#x20AC;&#x2122; healing process.

HELIPAD

STATICAL STRUCTURE

BUILDINGâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;S FIRST SKIN INFRASTRUCTURE SEMINAR SPACE SURGERY ROOMS

STERILE SECOND SKIN INTENSIVE CARE DIAGNOSTIC WING RESIDENCE CLINIC ADMINISTRATION INTERMEDIATE & NORMAL CARE KITCHEN & STORAGE STERILE CORRIDOR

CIRCULATION PATHS DNA EXTRACTION ORGAN BREEDING REHAB STORAGE & STERILE STORAGE

UNDERGROUND CAR PARK SITE

BIOTRONIC GARDENS

Site: MARIBOR, SLOVENIA Type: LANDSCAPE, BOTANIC, TECHNOLOGY Size: XL Client:DESIGN PROJECT Time: 02/2012-16/2012 LPHs: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Field: CONCEPT DESIGN PLANNING ORGANISATION

BIO(TRO)NIC GARDENS 5th design project â&#x20AC;&#x17E;Bio(tro)nic Gardens Mariborâ&#x20AC;&#x153; l summer term 2012 in collaboration with Gregor Loewit

The Biotronic Gardens are situated opposite the historic town on the south bank of the Drava, upriver from the old bridge. The topology of the place is defined by a strong, verdant green embankment that lifts the distance to the city owing to the river into the vertical. The Biotronic Gardens were largely taken underground to oppose the already beginning agglomeration on the banks and to preserve green space. The project concentrates on preserving this view and an intensified perception of the city and nature - from the north bank multiple slanted concrete masses are visible, engulfed by trees and bushes. The overgrown free space on the way to the next volume forms a funnel-shaped incision in the terrain. Just like the trees and bushes the visitor is attracted by this opening, one finds itself in a cave - the 'cathedralâ&#x20AC;&#x2DC;. Lenticular objects floating in the Drava bundle the light and channel it via polymere optical fibers towards the light dispersing archings on the ceiling of the cathedral, brightly illuminating it. At the same time, water is lead through capillaries in the threads into the storage tank and distributed for irrigation as needed. The originally not cropped underground garden begins to densify because of visitors and natural seed distribution. Therefore the visitor can become a co-designer of the underground park, consciously and unconsciously at the same time. This artificial casing for nature allows the consumer to intensely experience the local botany and conserves the embankment as a publicly accessible, natural landscape. Structures winding through the walls of the cave into the interior in multiple places generate hallways or balconies. Various path constellations lead to the volumes, which, depending on positioning

SVALBARD 78°N Site: LONGYEARBYEN, SVALBARD Type: EXTREME ENVIRONMENT, TERMINAL Size: L Client:DESIGN PROJECT Time: 01/2013-05/2013 LPHs: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Field: CONCEPT DESIGN PLANNING ORGANISATION

ITE CH

T OR NE

- 10,0m

- 5,0m

SEA LEVEL

“N

FLOORPLAN

- 20,0m

78°

AL SV

N D

OF OL E HO SC ECUR D N T LU RCHI A

ERDMAN MA HRIS RT - C A

SECTION

E M

TR E

R LE IL M

ELYN OSVATH LIIN - EV V A RO PI D BEYOND” - 201 N O K 3HA ST

IA - CLEM GARC ENS VID HO DA RE AND THE E CH U T C X

LINDBERG ILJA DA -M NIE R LA ONMENT ITE VIR RE EN

SECURITY ZONE

HUB BOATS

EXIT

PANORAMA GANGWAY

INDOOR PARK AND RESTAURANT

TOURIST INFO & SHOP

SHOP

SVALBARD EDUCATION PATH

PORT AUTHORITY

CIA - CLEMEN GAR SH VID OC DA HR RE AND THE E U T C E XT E K IT R

CRUISE SHIP TERMINAL SVALBARD design project in the „Advanced Architectural Design“ studio at LTH, Lund CH

E M

ER IT

EVELYN OSVATH VLIIN RO A TO D BEYOND” - 201 PI N S K A 3E H

LINDBERG - DAN IEL ILJA A -M MI NMENT LL IRO NV

summer term 2013 further information on http://issuu.com/clemenshochreiter/docs/aad-portfolio_clemenshochreiter D

The ways of peopleBapproaching to Svalbard respectively Longyearbyen is an important topic. Although AR L VA close to the Andventfjord no entrance from the town to the waterfront is provided and the city isSvery independent from the way of reaching the island one always needs to pass the unattractive an not well defined industrial and storage areas at the coast and sites close to the waterfront with big potentials are neglected. OF OL Eis to create space which simplifies the arrival of Svalbard‘s most The aim for the built environment HO SC ECUR D IT important customerLUasNARwell CH as it uses fallow parts of the town, reuses them and gives back common areas. Like central stations the in cities, a terminal for cruise ships could become the portal for the tourists to enter Longyearbyen and Svalbard, being situated as close as possible to todays city centre so that visitors get the possibilty to experience Longyearbyen, the landscape and the climate by feet. Due to its weather conditions Longyearbyen also lacks an informal place where the inhabitants can meet and spend some time. During the wintertime when no cruise ships are landing onto Svalbard, big parts of the terminal building get open up and accessible for the inhabitants of Longyeabyen offering them space to meet informally and giving them indoor spatial qualities of outdoor. The site for the project is on the waterfront in the north of Longyearbyen, a plot that provides a good ARCIA - CLE ME point of departure for Ga development bringing VID NS the city closer to the sea - a so far neglected part in the DA E AND THE R U H EX CT relationship-of Longyearbyen to its surrounding. E TR IT H A cruise shipCterminal has certain requestsE concerning movement flows of the huge amount of people using it in a very short period when leaving and entering the ships in cluding security and passport D checks. AR LB ships with up to 3500 passengers visit Svalbard only from may to august Since those 300m long Acruise V S this building must, beside from the for tourism necessary infrastructure, provide other possible uses all year round and for the people living there. While the indoor park, one of the key elements of the building, might be a pretty crowded space when OF the ships are anchoring at Longyearbyen OL it becomes a much more quiet area during the rest of the HO URE SC get C year. When the weather conditions ND TE more uncomfortable it acts as an extended living room for the LU RCHI A inhbitants of Longyearbyen where they can spend their spare time in this recreational space. Lying in between greenery inside a controlled environment whereas the winter is comming back outside, after this very short period of warmer temperatures. The main waiting area for the passengers changes into a promenade, where people can use the seating steps as a place to observe the extraordinary landscape. The passport, security and customs checks get removed and the torus-like shape offers a running track where the inhabitants can pursue activities they cannot do when the landscape gets covered by snow and ice again. The museum would act as a part of an educational area to inform the visitors and make them more conscious about this extraordinary piece of land they enter.

T OR

“N

PHER ERDMAN -M ISTO AR HR TA -C

T OR

“N

78°

A IEL AN

E M

- MILJA LINDBE R RG ITE RE ONMENT D CH VIR O EN

N OSVATH - LI INA ELY EV PI D BEYOND” - 201 KK N 3HA

78°

LER - MARTA NE MIL ST OR O

CORNU Site: MARIENHÖHE STOCKERAU, AUSTRIA Type: EXTREME ENVIRONMENT, TERMINAL Size: M Client:DESIGN PROJECT Time: 10/2011-01/2012 LPHs: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Field: CONCEPT DESIGN PLANNING ORGANISATION

CORNU

Building Construction M „Observation tower in Stockerau“ l winter term 2011 in collaboration with Harrytasch Ahmadian Neco

Cornu (lat. „wing“) is the town‘s landmark for Stockerau. A look-out which not only impresses because of the sight, Cornu also revitalises the Marienhöhe for everybody, because it’s motto is: „The journey is the reward.“ The initially unimpressive site in a little forest on top of the Marienhöhe, which is almost not apparent for pedestrians, provides the possibilities to revitalise the surrounding for the people and the nature. Cornu is using all of the potential of its conditions - it offers a great sight, an area to stay, to stroll and to relax.

As reminiscence to the old tower, which stood until 1998, the site is the same, but is going to be upgraded by its surrounding - also the way up to the observation platform becomes longer. The first part is a ramp from which you can see the activities around the water basin, the seating-accommodations and the haunt. Reaching the tower you are at the low end of the staircase, which is designed to be open to three sides - nothing blocks the sight during the way up. The observation platform is arranged in 27,5m height and is designed as a cantilevered gesture.

STAHLBLECH FLÜGEL STEIFENBLECH

T-PROFIL BOLZEN/VERSCHRAUBUNG WANGE/PODEST UNTERKONSTRUKTION/BLECH PODEST

ZUG-MEMBRAN KEFLAR

STAHLBLECH FLÜGEL SEGMENT 3 WINKELFÖRMIGE STAHLSPANDE STEIFENBLECH

SCHRAUBBOLZEN bündig mit Klemmplatte STAHLWANGE AUSSICHTSPLATTFORM GEGENELEMENT KLEMMPLATTE

MONTAGEFUGE SCHRAUBBOLZEN WINKELFÖRMIGE STAHLSPANDE STAHLBLECH FLÜGEL SEGMENT 2

KEDER

KLEMMPLATTE STAHL

STAHLWANGE AUSSICHTSPLATTFORM

STAHLBLECH FLÜGEL STEIFENBLECH WANGE/STIEGE BODENBELAG/EPOXY-BESCHICHTUNG PODEST UNTERKONSTRUKTION/BLECH T-PROFIL BOLZEN/VERSCHRAUBUNG

CONSTRUCTION To improve the constructional performance, the static element, the „wing“, is folded so vibrations caused by the wind or persons become reduced by the higher stiffness. In areas, where the wing has a strong curvature, we set additional ribs weld onto the wing, which increase the static height by using a minimum amount of material. To simplify the production of the whole construction, all surfaces are ruled surfaces, which means that they all, including the surfaces from the ramp and the staircase, can be cut out of planar surfaces - this helps reducing the costs of the construction. To permit prefabrication, the wing is segmented into three pieces, built in the factory and getting joined at the building

CROSS SECTION

site, sitting on a solid concrete basement. The ramp and the staircase are also prefabricated and become assembled in segments. The cantilevered observation platform is hold up by the last segment of the staircase at one side, at the other side it is lowered from the wing by a highly tear-resistant membrane out of Kevlar. To avoid an uncontrolled bending, caused by the induced load of the platform, an arc-like element is formed and the wing becomes opened for a better sight.

TOP VIEW

SOUTHERN VIEW

SITE PLAN

NORTHERN VIEW

FUGU ANGRIFF IST DIE

Site: INNSBRUCK, AUSTRIA Type: INSTALLATION, LIGHT, INTERACTION Size: 25M2 Client:STUDENTS COMPETITION Time: 02/2010-05/2010 LPHs: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Field: CONCEPT DESIGN PLANNING ORGANISATION

FUGU - ANGRIFF IST DIE BESTE VERTEIDIGUNG student competition „burning architecture“ l summer term 2010 in collaboration with Alexander Topf and Harrytasch Ahmadian Neco BSc

An old concrete structure, not much noticed by the pedestrians, marks the entrance at the eastern end of the Waltherpark in Innsbruck. Its exposed location, opposite to the historical centre of Innsbruck, got used to attract people into the Waltherpark during the festival of “ the architecture days”. The Genius Loci should be reanimated and the potential of the existing structure reactivated. FUGU nests itself into the existing concrete ribs without damaging it - the original form is still noticeable and a new form gets injected. FUGU is the built defence reaction of a site against decline and inconsiderable. FUGU is intended to illustrate the transition between street and park - so the visitors should be forced to focus on the activities in the park. Due to the wind, every single bar starts to swing and the people get the illusion of a living character. During the night, the installation is an additional source of light and the pavilion becomes focussed and shows the convertibility of existing structures.

UMBRÜGGLER ALM Site: INNSBRUCK, AUSTRIA Type: APLINE, GASTRONOMY, LANDSCAPE Size: 505M2 NGF. Client:IIG STADT INNSBRUCK Time: 12/2013-01/2014 LPHs: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Field: CONCEPT DESIGN PLANNING ORGANISATION

UMBRÜCKLER ALM

Competition for SOMMERARCHITEKTUR I winter 2013/2014 in collaboration with DI Arch. Gilbert Sommer

Auf die Merkmale des vorhandenen Terrains einzugehen und darauf entsprechend zu reagieren das wesentliche Entwicklungskonzept des Projekts. Wie selbstverständlich ruht die Umbrückler Alm im Gelände. Der Baukörper entwickelt sich von Westen, sich an das Gelände anschmiegend, nach Osten zu einem Präsenz vermittelnden Körper, der sich im Norden wieder im Gelände verliert. Die dabei entstehende Fassadenlinie definiert präzise und signifikant, sich dennoch harmonisch ins Gelände integrierend, die räumliche Grenze zwischen internen und externen Raumbespielungen: 1. die nach Norden geschützte Terrasse mit ihrer talorientierten Ausrichtung von Süd-Ost nach West. 2. Plateau und Wiese am „Dach“ des Gebäudes als zusätzlicher, hochwertiger Freiraum. 3. Gasträume und Küche im „präsenten“ 2-geschoßigen Bereich des Baukörpers; das Waldklassenzimmer wird zentral im Eingangsbereich ins Spiel gebracht. 4. Dienende Räume im Hang, von Westen nach Osten den funktionalen Abläufen entsprechend angeordnet. 5. Unterkunftsräume und Technik sowie Holzlager im Untergeschoß. Die Raumgrenze ist aus sägerauhen Lärchenholzrohrlingen mit unterschiedlich großen Querschnitten gebildet. Sie vermittelt von Außen Schutz und Stärke und bietet die notwendige Transparenz für die Innenräume sowie Ausblicke ins Tal durch teilweises oder über gewisse Strecken gänzliches Weglassen einzelner oder mehrerer Rohlinge.

HAUS SDV-H Site: MÃ&#x2013;SENDORF, AUSTRIA Type: RESIDENTIAL, SINGLE FAMILY HOUSE Size: 385M2 WH-NFL. Client:PRIVATE Time: 04/2011-12/2015 LPHs: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Field: CONCEPT DESIGN PLANNING ORGANISATION

Obergeschoss

Erdgeschoss

Untergeschoss

AWARDS & PUBLICATIONS

Oktober 2013

April 2013

2012

August - November 2012

May 2011

February 2011 May 2010

November 2009 June 2007

ONLINE

Publication of “Redesign Marktplatz”, “Cornu Stockerau” and “Maribor 2112 - Bio(tro)nic Gardens” in the “Research And Project Almanac” of the Institute for Experimantal Architecture. Hochbau (ISBN: 978-3902936097) A part of our “Advanced Architectural Design” studio’s work got published on the bldg-blog, including my “biomimicry of polar plants” project on Svalbard (http://bldgblog.blogspot.co.at/2013/04/arctic-instruments.html) Publication of „Maribor 2112 - Bio(tro)nic Gardens“ in “2112Ai I 100YC”, the catalogue of the 100YC projects at Architecture Biennale in Venice 2012 (ISBN: 978-961-93338-1-5) Exhibited at the Architecture Biennale in Venice 2012 in the Slovenian pavilion with the project „Maribor 2112 - Bio(tro)nic Gardens“ in collaboration with Gregor Loewit Nominated for the OUT OF BOX AWARD 2011 in the category „Urban Style - Architecture“ with the project „FUGU“ Awarded in the category „Art“ at the „Timberconstruction Award Tyrol 2011“ with the project „FUGU“ Winner of the students competition „Architektur die brennt“ rewarded by the faculty for architecture of the University Innsbruck with the project „FUGU“ (http://projectfugu.blogspot.com) in collaboration with Harrytasch Ahmadian Neco and Alexander Topf Achievement scholarship for the academical year 2008/09 Winner of the Upper-Austrian award for building techniques in collaboration with Bernhard Mayr

For further information concerning my projects I have published some of my work online. Therefore please visit my issuu-page: http://issuu.com/clemenshochreiter/docs