Clifford portfolio recent work

ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN PORTFOLIO CLIFFORD SHIH RECENT WORK (315)247 - 6508

CONTENT 01

PAC 12 CONFERENCE AND OFFICE ARCHITECTURAL INTERIOR OFFICE T.I.

02

GANNNETT / KING 5 TV STATION

03

WATER GARDEN SITE

04

ARCHITECTURAL INTERIOR BROADCAST & OFFICE T.I.

SITE REPOSITION

THE LOOKOUT ARCHITECTURE EXTERIOR REPOSITION

05

REVITALIZING WATERFRONT - THE SINKING CITY Thesis Project Instructor: Julie Larson, Yutaka Sho

06

URBAN SPONGE - Massive Change Instructor: Shawn Rickenbecker, Rickenbacker & Leung

07

HOUSE KINO MUSIC SCHOOL Instructor: J端rgen Johner, J端rgen Johner Architekten

08

URBAN TRANSVERING - The Brooklyn Bridge Park Instructor: Jared Valle, AJ Pires, DellaValle Pires

09

SHANXI TATUNG SOLAR POWER EXPO RESTAURANT- SHANXI TATUNG COMPETITION

10

RADIOLARIAN

Design Internship - YB Design Studio, Shanghai, China

Instructor: Amber Bartosh

11

ADVANCED BUILDING SYSTEM - ARC 423 Instructor: Michael Pelken

12

SIMMONS HALL FACADE - ARC 500 Facade as Idea Instructor: Randle Korman

-

-

PAC 12 CONFERENCE & OFFICE SPACE SAN FRANCISCO CA 32,000 SF Architectural Interior T.I. OямГce Project 2013

Entry Wall

Entry Wall with Light Box

Feature Wall

Technology Feature Wall

PAC 12 Feature Wall with Banquette

Pantry

Open OďŹƒce

Softball Wall

Open Team Meeting Space

Light Box Display

GANNETT KING 5 TV OFFICE & BROADCAST SPACE SEATTLE

WA

50,000 SF Architectural Interior T.I. OямГce & Broadcast Project 2014

-

Perspective @ Newsroom

Perspective @ Pantry and Stairs

Perspective @ Coee Area

Perspective @ Secure Recepion Area

16

17

19

18

25' - 0"

25' - 0"

20

25' - 0"

21

25' - 0"

22

25' - 0"

23

25' - 0"

24

25' - 0"

25

25' - 0"

25.8

25' - 0"

21' - 10"

NEW DAY 239

EVENING MAGAZINE 238

CONFERENCE ROOM 229

INVESTIGATIVE REPORTERS 228

EVENING MAGAZINE 238

VO ROOM 227

27

3' - 2"

14' - 6"

2' - 8"

HUDDLE ROOM 225 ENGINEERING / OPS MANAGER 242

26

EXEC. NEWS DIRECTOR 215

VO ROOM 226

A A2

12' - 1"

15

NEWS MANAGER 216

B

DISPLAY 235

MONITOR 24"

4

SECURE STORAGE 234

PHONE ROOM 222

REF

18 '-6 "

23' - 1"

24" MONITOR

24" MONITOR

IT 233

B2

MONITOR 24"

MONITOR 24"

24" MONITOR

SECURE EQUIPMENT STORAGE 236

COPY/ SUPPLIES 237

Room 244

NEWS FLASHCAM 213

CONFERENCE ROOM 217

PHONE ROOM 223

MONITOR

COLLABORATION 243

PHONE ROOM 224 INVESTIGATE 230

24"

EVENING MAGAZINE 231

SECURE EQUIPMENT STORAGE 232

12' - 6"

NEWS STAND-UP 212

COFFEE BAR 245

12 '-0 "

MEDIA / PREP 221

GENERAL/ STATION MANAGER 251

COLLABORATION 218

REF

Y2 DISPLAY 246

Y3

X1

REF

C

DN

1.3 HUDDLE ROOM 248

CR

NEWS ROOM 211

ELEVATOR CORRIDOR 201

DN

HUDDLE ROOM 249

X2

B7

3

41' - 4 3/4"

ASSISTANTS 250

HUDDLE ROOM 247

30 '-6 "

IT RISER CLOSET 220

PANTRY AREA 219

8' - 11"

6' 6"

DISPLAY 252

30 '-8 "

26' - 2"

Y1

DISPLAY 204

HUDDLE ROOM 203

1.5 MAKEUP 206

DN

CR

D

MARKETING SUITE 207

DN

SECURE STORAGE 208

HUDDLE ROOM 209

COPY/ PRINT 210

4

30' - 0"

MARKETING 205

24 '-6 "

1.4

X3

28 '-6 "

D7

14' - 6"

X4

E

30 '-6 "

2' - 8"

11 '-4 "

12' - 1"

X5

10 '-4 "

19 '-6 "

X5.5

X6 XA

Plan @ 2nd Floor

XB

XC

E8 F

B2

B

A2

C

A

1.3

1.4

1.5

D

4

PLASTIC LAMINTE COUNTERTOP (PL-4)

PT-4

BASE CABINETS (PL-2) GL-2

GL-2

GL-2

GL-2

EQ

EQ

GL-2

GL-2

2' - 10 1/2"

8' - 2"

GL-2

8' - 2"

GL-2

RUBBER BASE (RB-1)

8' - 2"

G1 A903

2 EQ

EQ

EQ

EQ

EQ

EQ

EQ

EQ

13' - 10 1/8" @ (8) EQ PANELS

RUBBER BASE (RB-1)

G7

F7

ELEVATION COPY 309

1/2" = 1'-0"

ELEVATION HR 335 CONTROLLER 336 CONFERENCE ROOM 337 GLASS WALL

1/2" = 1'-0"

SINK FAUCET

24

JUST MFG. MOEN

EQ

EQ

23' - 5 3/8"

C7

1/2" = 1'-0"

ELEVATION PRESENTATION ROOM 319 FRONT

US-1824-A-18 87350E

B

PAINTED GYP. SOFFIT SOLID STONE SHELVING (SS-1) 3 2 WG PT-6

3

PT-3

2' - 0"

G1 A903

E5 A903

E1 A903

BASE CABINETS FINISH ENDS (PL-2)

9' - 0"

SOLID STONE COUNTERTOP (SS-1)

9' - 0"

B1 A904

BASE CABINETS FINISH ENDS (PL-1)

GL-4

2' - 10 1/2"

2

G1 A903

RUBBER BASE RB-1) REFRIGERATOR GE CZS25TSE

EQ

EQ

EQ

1' - 6"

1' - 6"

2' - 0"

EQ

EQ

EQ

EQ

EQ

EQ

DISHWASHER BOSCH SGE63E15UC

3

SCHEDULED BASE (RB-1)

9' - 0"

EQ

EQ

PLASTIC LAMINTE COUNTERTOP (PL-4) BASE CABINETS (PL-2) FINISH ENDS

GL-2

1' - 6 7/8"

1' - 6 7/8"

1' - 6 7/8"

1' - 6 7/8"

1' - 6 7/8"

1' - 6 7/8"

1' - 6 7/8"

1' - 6 7/8"

1' - 6 7/8"

1' - 6 7/8"

1' - 6 7/8"

1' - 6 7/8"

1' - 6 7/8"

1' - 6 7/8"

22' - 0" @ (14) EQ PANELS

F3

ELEVATION COPY 315

RUBBER BASE (RB-1)

C3

ELEVATION G/O & EXPANSION 324 MILLWORK

1/2" = 1'-0"

D

4

SOLID STONE SHELFING (SS-2)

SOLID STONE COUNTERTOP (SS-2) PT-3

SOLID STONE SHELFING (SS-2)

COUNTERTOP BACKSPLASH (GL-4)

WG

SOLID STONE COUNTERTOP (SS-2)

14' - 2 5/8"

G1 A903

BASE CABINETS FINISH ENDS (PL-2) RUBBER BASE (RB-1)

E5 A903

RUBBER BASE (RB-1)

REFRIGERATOR GE CZS25TSE

2

VENDING MACHINE (OFOI)

1/2" = 1'-0"

SCHEDULED BASE (RB-1)

ELEVATION COFFEE 306 NORTH WALL MILLWORK

EQ

EQ

1' - 7 1/2"

1' - 8 1/2"

4

6' - 10 1/2" 3

E1

1/2" = 1'-0"

4

BASE CABINETS (PL-2) FINISH ENDS

B1 A904

G1 A903

2' - 10 1/2"

GL-4

2' - 0"

9' - 0" 2' - 0"

E1 A903

B3

ELEVATION COLLABORATION 328 WALL

1/2" = 1'-0"

SINK JUST MFG. US-1824-A-18 FAUCET MOEN 87350E

G1

GL-2

RUBBER BASE (RB-1)

2

2

2' - 10 1/2"

1/2" = 1'-0"

ELEVATION COPY 333

B2

G1 A903

9' - 0"

G3

EQ

2' - 10 1/2"

2' - 10 1/2"

EQ

1/2" = 1'-0"

A

2

RUBBER BASE (RB-1)

EQ

B5

PERSPECTIVE @ 3RD FLOOR PANTRY

PT-7

BASE CABINETS FINISH ENDS (PL-2)

SCHEDULED BASE (RB-1) EQ

A2

PLASTIC LAMINTE COUNTERTOP (PL-4)

G1 A903

D5

3

B

PT-4

EQ

6' - 6" @ (4) EQ PANELS

2

18' - 4 3/4"

ELEVATION PANTRY 325 MILLWORK

EQ

8' - 2"

EQ

1/2" = 1'-0"

RUBBER BASE (RB-1)

SCHEDULED BASE (RB-1) EQ

G5

PLASTIC LAMINTE COUNTERTOP (PL-4)

MICROWAVE GE CEB1590SS

18' - 4 5/8"

2' - 10 1/2"

GL-2

1' - 8 1/2"

2' - 0"

DISHWASHER BOSCH SGE63E15UC

ELEVATION COFFEE 306 EAST WALL MILLWORK

EQ

1' - 4 3/8"

2' - 8 5/8"

6' - 9 5/8" @ (5) EQ PANELS

EQ

2

3

SCHEDULED BASE (RB-1)

B1

PERSPECTIVE @ 3RD FLOOR COFFEE 306

PERSPECTIVE @ COLLABORATION 328 WALL

2

ALL IGN

Isometric @ Pantry and Stairs

-

-

WATER GARDEN SITE EXTERIOR REFRESH SANTA MONICA

CA

Site Reposition Project 2013

3

2

1

5

4

6

8

7

9

11

10

12

14

13

15

16

19

18

17

20

22

21

23

25

24

26

28

27

29

31

30

32

34

33

35

36

A

B LIMIT OF WORK

LIMIT OF WORK

12

12

16

19 1

1

LIMIT OF WORK

WEST VEHICULAR DROP-OFF

LIMIT OF WORK

1

16

12

16

16

12

16

EAST VEHICULAR DROP-OFF

30

C 7

1

7 13

13 1

D

1 23

LIMIT OF WORK

E IT M LI F O W K R O

F

2450 COLORADO AVENUE

R K O

K R O

O F O F

W

O

R K

B

LI M IT

LIMIT OF WORK

A

LI M IT

1

K LIMIT OF WORK

9 11

30

9

1601 CLOVERFIELD BOULEVARD

LIMIT OF WORK

30

8 28

N

1620 26TH STREET

8

23

MATCHLINE - SEE A312S

11

29

28

19

LI M IT

28

R K O W O F LI M IT

1 1

28

C

U

D

17

1

23

W

MATCHLINE - SEE A313S

K R O

K R O

W

W

MATCHLINE - SEE A312S

V

F O

F O

IT M LI

28

IT M LI

2425 W. OLYMPIC BOULEVARD

13

T

16

23

LIMIT OF WORK

LIMIT OF WORK

24

R 30

S LIMIT OF WORK

O

R K

14

O F

Q

LIMIT OF WORK

LIMIT OF WORK

29

16

1

30

LIMIT OF WORK

9

MATCHLINE - SEE A313S

9

GREAT LAWN 28

30

30

MATCHLINE - SEE A311S

13

1

26

19

P

10 TYP. 18

W

M 16

MAIN PLAZA

8

LIMIT OF WORK

MATCHLINE - SEE A310S

16

L

23

17 9

30

LIMIT OF WORK

9

7

14

1

16 J

8

30

G

H 1

W

W

K R O

F O

W

LIMIT OF WORK

O F

W

O

R K

1

LI M IT

MATCHLINE - SEE A310S

LIMIT OF WORK

F O

IT M LI

IT M LI

24

MATCHLINE - SEE A311S

24

23

X

Y

Z

1

28

LIMIT OF WORK

1

16

16 1

AA 28

1 1

28

30 1

BB

LIMIT OF WORK

11

1

CC

11

16 GATEWAY PLAZA

23

13

DD 23

10 TYP. EE

Overall Site Plan

Central Plaza

Pavilion

Gateway Plaza

Gateway Plaza

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 2

PLAZA LEVEL

Pavilion and Building Relationship

Pedestrian Drop O

Overhang

Walls 3-coat exterior plaster

20’

exterior plaster

14’ 1/4”

FRONT ELEVATION

20’

Seating Cast-in place concrete with wood seating surface (ipe or similar sustainable hardwood species)

Climbing Vegetation on 3/16” Steel Cables

Wood (ipe or similar susteainable hardwood species)

11’ 6”

TYPICAL PAVILION VIGNETTE REAR ELEVATION

40’

14’ 1/4” 11’ 6”

Pavilion

SIDE ELEVATION

-

-

THE LOOKOUT 12655 W JEFFERSON BLVD MARINA DEL RAY

CA

Architecture Exterior Reposition Project 2013

Aerial View

Front Entrance

Front Entrance

Reception Area

Reception Area

Reception Area

1st Floor Plan

Sectional Perspective

REVITALIZING WATERFRONT THE SINKING CITY Shanghai

China

2013 Spring Thesis Project Architectural Design Solution to Solve the Issue of the Sinking City Water Filtration Plant, Ports Terminal, and Public Space

Y g Zh

u

T

h u

Nantong

g

ji g

W i S

REVITALIZING WATERFRONT THE SINKING CITY

Hu hou

The effects of transitional water ecological situations are radically changing the way Shanghai is living. The realities of water used to be the gestation of Chinese civiliztion has now proved to be a threat to Shanghai.

A waterfront condition at the Bund, the edge of Huangpu River, Shanghai, China has manifested the sinking of Shanghai. As the process of soaring water and sinking city sprawls, the submergence deviates the spatial and structural conditions of the Bund and surrounding waterfront condition. Shanghai is strongly bond with Huangpu River. The city itself is formed by the Yangtze River, to the civilization lives near the river, to the occupying by West; nonetheless, to the most occupied ports in China. Though water is critical to Shanghai’s development, Shanghai is sinking.

u

an zho

i i g

H

aiz o

enjian Nan n

h u

Baoshan

Jiangsu Changzhou

uzho

Zhoushan S China

Yangte River Delta

N

Jiading

ux

z

8

5

21

9 Pudong

3

J ax n

bo

7 6 4

Qingpu

Shanghai

Minhang

Nanhui

Songjiang

angz o

Zhejiang

haoxing

ing

Taizhou u

1910s

Fengxian Jinshan

1

1990s

Huangpu

2010s

SITE PLAN 1920

PeopleM

2000

0.725”/YEAR

lower 58”

echanical

urban

urban

boundary

hybrid water

lower 72”

2010 1.4”/YEAR

filtrate water private

cross river public

cross river public

filtrate water private

eop

ec an ca

water

Water Treatment Plant

Port Terminal

Restaurant

Project Location

Program

Structure - Module

Program Break Down

The project locates next to the Shanghai bund, in which built to prevent water flooded into the city, functions as an embankment. The project tends to propose a new method to solve the issue of water while maintain interaction with water.

The programs of the project consist a water treatment plant, a port terminal, and a public space. Starting with three buildings that accommodate the programs, yet each programs require more space than a level. As a result, more programs are designed to be underground so that the project wouldn’t become a boundry between urban space and water space.

The project uses a designed module with its repetition and stacking forming the structure, this structure serves as the facade, and circulation as well

Even though the programs were defined on the upper level, when they go to underground level (B1, B2) these programs connect extrude water from huangpu river

send water down to filtration process

first level water filtration

second level water filtration

Water Hole

clean water send to underground aquafiers

mud process

clean water send to underground aquafiers

Water Hole clean water send to underground aquafiers

Water Hole

Carving Exterior - Deformation

Entrance & Exit

Water Hole & Vertical Circulation

Water Circulation

Carving out the roof, the original box form of the project was subtracted by the spheres in order to fit with the site for the sunlight, and introducing the skylight into the project

The entrance and exit was clearfully design to fit with the module structure so that when entering or existing the project, people are always walking in or out to the carve out space.

One of the main goals in this project was to clean the water from Huangpu River, and send the clean water down to underground aquafiers. After the filtration process, water are send to the aquafiers from water holes. These water holes also function as vertical circulation

The water movement in Huangpu River runs from South to North; therefore, the water pump stations are set to be at the South and the highest level. With the gravity force, the water filtration process are designed to flow from ground level into underground level

E

D

E

C

D C

1 3 2

3

2

1

1

10

4

4 17

D D

C

C

B 5

B 7

17

10 6

5

6

15

10 A

17 A

5 9

14

16

10

8

12

7

11

17

13

GROUND FLOOR PLAN E

B 11

B

A

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17

Entrance to Water Treatment Plant Water Pump Station Locker Office & Monitor Desk Entrance to Ports Terminal Lobby Shops Ticketing Information Storage Entrance to Restaurant Indoor Seating Kitchen Outdoor Seating Ports Water Hole Vertical Circulation Ground Floor Plan 1’ = 1 / 32”

N

10 9 8 A

E

BASEMENT 1 FLOOR PLAN

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

Office Mechanical Room Storage Water Tank Shops Seating Indoor Seating Kitchen Storage Vertical Circulation Water Hole

Basement One Plan 1’ = 1 / 32”

N

VIEW FROM WATERFRONT

VIEW FROM STREET

Module Design Structure

Facade

Water Tank

The project is designed through a module that will have the ability to function as four purposes Structure, Facade, Water Tank, and Circulation.

Through the x and y axis of repetition, the module becomes the structure that creating floor plates as well as supporting structure for the architecture.

The facade is the repetition of modules.

Water Tank is designed in the module. Water tank requires higher sturctural support; therefore, the buttom of the module becomes underground.

The circulation of the project are divided into water and people.

Water is going along the x-axis and people are going in the y-axis.

Though the circulation are divided, people and water are always interact with each other through visual and spatial relationship.

WALL DETAILED SECTION

Section through Ports Terminal

Section A 1’ = 1 / 8”

Section through Public Space

URBAN SPONGE Massive Change New York City

NY

2012 Fall VC Studio Rickenbacker & Leung Architectural Design Solution to Solve the Issue of URBAN AIR POLLUTION Collaborated with Chao Dou

URBAN SPONGE Massive Change

The project is situated on Canal St. and Varick St. Right on the exist of Holland Tunnel. New York City is considered as one of the most polluted city in the world. We are proposing a prototype of air filtration architecture that will have the ability to filter the polluted air from the city and then return the cleaned air into the city. The idea of the project is absorbing nature of sponge as a porous object, filtering the polluted air through the designed facade; finally, returning the filtered air to the city.

Polluted Air

Air Filtration Process

Urban Sponge

Clean Air

site pedestrian circulation

create oppurtunity for pedestrians to move across the project yet 1st floor serve as a public space

filtration surrounds the site

park space near site

macro climate micro climate

?

macro climate

uran smog

uran traffic

with the filtration surround the project, this create an oppurtunity to have macro vs micro climate situation

5 volumes to house the program

what can we do to filter air ?

absorbing air

clean urban air

plan 1st floor

n

the impermeable surface would create air resistant

UP

UP

PROGRAM

2

1

1 AUDITORIAN AUDITORIAN STORAGE BACKROOM

UP

5,200 SQ-FT

3

2 ADMISSION FRONT DESK COAT CHECK FRONT OFFICE M/F RESTROOM STORAGE ELEVATOR X 2 FIRE STAIRS 2,810 SQ-FT

5 4

porous opening allows for air to penetrate through the box

3 EXHIBITIOON EXHIBITION 2,500 SQ-FT 4 CAFE

plan 2nd floor

SEATINGS KITCHEN 3,000 SQ-FT

plan 3rd floor

5 CORE 1,595 SQ-FT

n

the lifted porous box allows for air circulation and public access to the site

GROUND FLOOR PLAN

PROGRAM

2

1

PROGRAM

2

1

1 library

1 laborat

5,300 SQ-FT 2 classroom M/F RESTROOM STORAGE ELEVATOR X 2 FIRE STAIRS 3,100 SQ-FT

3

5

3 classroom class x 2 3,250 SQ-FT

4

5,50

2 lounge M S EL FI 3,00

3

5

3 office

4

o 3,55

4 classroom class

4 office

of

3,000 SQ-FT

SECOND FLOOR PLAN

5 CORE 1,595 SQ-FT

n

3,00

THIRD FLOOR PLAN

5 CORE 1,59

wall section rooftop

70’-0”

skin

65’-0”

1 2 3

filtration 62 62’-0” 0 5

4

4th 4 th floor fllo oo or r 49’-6” 49 6

3rd floor 37’-6”

2nd floor 25’-6”

6 7

filtration 12 12’-6” 6

1st floor 0’-6” r road 0’-0” 0 0

1 tal str t r rti al 2 tal str t r hori ontal 3 l tri n rator 4 h pa filt r 5 l tri al parti l har r filt r 6 r infor tal str t r 7 tal st r t r

wall section diagram air in

absorb dirty air

air out

exhuast clean air

an one absorb exhuast air rein orce structure

electrical article char er

trans arent

solid

trans arent

solid

he a ilter

s in

Aerial View of URBAN SPONGE

Street View of URBAN SPONGE

House KinO Music School Villa Renovention Hamburg

Germany

2011 Spring Comprehensive Studio Renovention of A Villa Into A Modern Music School Collaborated with Jeffery Cheung King & King Competition -- 1st Prize

1

2

3

4

5

6

7 8

9

10

11

12

A Classroom

B Orchestra Pit

C

Courtyard

Entrance

Classroom M

F

D UP E

Classroom

Public Lobby Caf’e

Academic Lobby

Lecture Hall

F G Dean’s Office

Conference

Office

Office

Office

H I

Storage

M

J

F

Dance Studio

Classroom

K

L

1

2

3

4

5

6

7 8

9

10

11

Classroom

Back Back Stage Stage

Stage

Auditorium Seating Area Level 1

D

Back Stage

Stage

E

Classroom

Wings

Wings

F

F

G

G

H

H

I

I

L

4

C Classroom

F Restroom

E

K

3

Wings

B

M Restroom

C

J

2

A Wings

B

D

1

12

A

Dance Studio Dance Studio

J

Classroom

Classroom

Classroom

Classroom

K

L

Auditorium Seating Area Level 2

5

6

7 8

9

10

11

12

DD#2 Access, Egress, Transport & Core Services System Design - Egress ARC 322 I Building System Design II

Prof. Robert Svetz

I

Clifford Shih and Jeff Cheung

In this project, Hamburg School for the Performing Arts, the occupancy classification is Group E. The total occupant load in Auditorium is 500 people including the performers; therefore, the minimal number of exits is three,yet for a better circulation and evacuation circumstances, the decision is made to have five exits, including three normal exits to the Lobby are, and two exits to the fire stairs. Within the project, there are total of six entrances. The major entrance located on the north facade open for both public event and to the academic portion. The ramp is also another entrance that provides for ground floor entry also allows for outdoor theater and to the academic portion as well. The office area also has its own exit. Within all the dance studio, there are a fire stairs that runs through first floor to thrid floor for better safety. The last exit would be the exit located on the south facade which is specifically for class room and lecture hall.

There are two elevators in the school, both located in the school portion; however, still have accessbility to the public auditorim for accessible-needed. In the first floor public lobby space, there are a escalator running both up and down, in order to provide a faster transportaion to the auditorium.

In this project, there is no dead-end. Within all the spaces, there are either corridors or doors lead you to the fire stairs or exiteror. The longest distance from a space to the exit is 75 ft.

Occupant Load Auditorium: 350 Seatings = 350 Occupant Stage Area = 1395 sq ft / 15 = 93 Occupant Total: 350+93= 443 Occupant Caf’e:1545 sqft / 15 = 103 Occupant Leecture Hall: 100 Seatings = 100 Occupant stage= 235 sq ft / 15 = 15 Occupant Total 115 Occupant Rehersal Space: 424+441+942 / 7 = 258 Occupant Classroom: 501+322+340+200+450 / 20= 91 Occupant

In the Fourth Floor, There are One Stairs that take you to the auditorium, and also there will be one exterior fire Stairs for the backstage workers and audiencce.

Wings

Back Stage

Auditorium Seating Area Level 2

Stage

Wings

Fourth Floor Plan 1/32’=1”

In the Third Floor, There are One Stairs that take you to the auditorium, and also there will be one exterior fire Stairs for the stage Performer and audiene. In addition, elevators are located in the Dance Studio, and One Fire Stairs is located for evacuation.

Wings

Fire Staircase for Concert Hall Space - 200 People

Stairs run from first to second floor- lead to the north exit

Outdoor Plaza, also, allow access to the basement floor school, it’s also the fire exist for the basement floor

Auditorium Seating Area Level 1

Stage

Back Stage

Wings Restroom

Dance Studio

Fire Exist espicially for lecture hall for 100 people

Third Floor Plan 1/32’=1”

In the Second Floor, There are One Stairs that take you to the auditorium, and also there will be one exterior fire Stairs for the stage Performer and audience. In addition, elevators are located in the Academic Lobby, and One Fire Stairs is located in Dance Studio, the other one is located near all the classroom.

Classroom

Classroom Back Stage

Stage

Auditorium Seating Area Level 1 Classroom

Wings

Dance Studio

Second Floor Plan 1/32’=1”

Classroom

Classroom

Classroom

Classroom

In the First Floor, There are One Escalator that take you to the auditorium,and also there will be one exterior fire Stairs for the auditorium space. In addition, elevators are located in the Academic Lobby, and One Fire Stairs is located in Dance Studio, the other one is located near all the classroom. There are two major entrances, and 4 alternative exits for the schools.

Classroom

Orchestra Pit

Courtyard

Entrance

Classroom M

UP

F

Classroom

Public Lobby Caf’e Ca

There will be two sets of the elevator, in which, it will run through every floors.

Exit for first floor for office people the entance and the exit of the house if a ramp that runs through the whole building, an eggress design for east-west circulation

Academic Lobby

Stairs run from first to thrid floor specially for library space lead to the south exit

Dean’s Office f ffice

Conference

Office f ffice

Office f ffice

Lecture Hall

Office f ffice

Storage

M

F

Dance Studio

Egress Design for Private (school) Egress Design for Public (Auditorium)

Classroom

First Floor Plan 1/32’=1”

Egress Design for Accessible-Needed Egress Design for Fire Stairs Egress Design for Normal Stairs

UP

UP

Egress Design for Elevator Ground Floor Plan 1/32’=1”

In the Ground Floor, There are elevator located in the lounge area. On the West Side, there is a ramp can take you back to First Floor, on the East side, there are an outdoor theater that have both stairs and ramp to take you to First Floor

East - West Section 1/16” = 1’ pg 9 / C. Shih and J. Cheung

Longitudinal Section

East - West Section 1/16” = 1’

Sectional Model

Rendering of Lobby Area

Rendering of Underground Pathway

URBAN TRANSVERING The Brooklyn Bridge Park New York City

NY

2010 Fall VC Studio DellaValle Pires Instructor: Jared Valle, AJ Pires Hotel and Residential Complex

URBAN TRANSVERING The Brooklyn Bridge Park Produce an economically viable project that will contribute toward ongoing maintenance and operation of the park Further the vision of the park by designing structures to be seamlessly integrated with and complementary to the site’s surroundings.

Public

Hotel Residential Private Public

Private

Design Progress

UP UP

Hotel Portion

30 Rooms of 500 sf 3 Elevators (including 1 Fire Elevator) 1 Fire Stairs 1 Housekeeping Room 1 Service Room

Residential Portion

UP

UP UP

UP

U U UP UP P

UP U

9 Rooms of 900 sf 3 Elevators (including 1 Fire Elevator) 1 Fire Stairs 2 Open Balconys

Typical Floor (3rd to 5th) Plan 1’ = 1/32” 1

Island / River Quietness Private

Residential

Hotell Manhattan Skyline

Liberty Island

City / Bridge Movement Public

Governors Island

Local Destination

Local Influence

Section 1’ = 1/32”

Project Management Profit & Loss Statement

Brooklyn Bridge Park Budget

Hotel P &L As s umptions Gr oss SF Avail abl e t o Hot el

125, 000

Net SF Avail abl e t o Rooms

75, 000

Net SF t o Ammeni t y

FACTOR

25, 000

Rooms

Construction Stablization

150

Gr oss SF per Room

833 500

Acquisition

Ammeni t ySF per Room

167

Building Acquisition

Maxi mum Room Night s

54, 750

NOTES Months from closing to start of construction

12

Months of construction

24

Months from completion of construction to final sale or lease

$ (1.43) $ (500,000)

Donated by City

$ (1.43) $ (500,000) Hard Costs

$650

Aver age Occupancy

TOTAL

12

48

Net SF per Room

ADR

PSF

Schedule (Months) Pre-Development

Renovation Trade Cost

80. 0%

STABALI ZED

/ NI GHTS

/ OCC NI GHTS

/ ROOM

$

35, 587, 500

Occupi ed Room Revenue

$

28, 470, 000

$ (25.00) $ (8,750,000)

From $0 to $75 per Gross SF; Varies by extent of renovation

$ (25.00) $ (8,750,000)

General Conditions

10.00%

$ (2.50) $ (875,000)

A Market percentage of total trade costs; Varies by project size

Insurance

2.00%

$ (0.55) $ (193,000)

A Market percentage of total trade costs; Varies by project size

Fee, Overhead & Profit

3.00%

$ (0.75) $ (262,500)

A Market percentage of total trade costs; Varies by project size

%

Hard Cost Subtotal Contingency

R oom Income Gr oss Maxi mum Room Revenue

350,000

Total Trade Costs

$ (28.80) $ (10,080,500) 5.0%

$ (1.44) $ (504,025)

From 5% to 10% of Subtotal Costs; Varies by previous project experience

$ (30.24) $ (10,584,525)

$

520

$

650

$

189, 800

Department Income

70% Soft Costs Architect's Fees

10.00%

$ (3.02) $ (1,058,453)

From 6% to 12% of Hard Cost; Varies by project size

Engineer's Fees

2.50%

$ (0.72) $ (252,000)

From 2% to 4% of Hard Cost; Varies by project size

CM / Owner's Rep Fees

$2,500

$ (0.34) $ (120,000)

A Monthly Fee; Varies by required oversight/time commitment

Spa, Fi t nes s or Ot her

10. 0%

$

2, 847, 000

$

52

$

65

$

18, 980

7% Expediting & Permitting Fees

$ (0.14) $ (50,000)

Estimate; Varies by project size/entitlement complexity

Food & Bever age

30. 0%

$

8, 541, 000

$

156

$

195

$

56, 940

Legal - Transactional 21%

$ (0.04) $ (15,000)

A total dollar amount; Varies by transaction volume

Tel ephone & Ot her

3. 0%

$

854, 100

$

16

$

20

$

5, 694

$

40,712,100

$

744

$

930

$

271, 414

T otal G ros s R evenue

Legal - Construction

Utilities Risk & Liability Insurance

R oom E xpens es Rooms

Property Tax

28. 5%

$

( 8, 113, 950) $

( 148) $

( 185) $

( 54, 093)

Community Relations 26% Developer Fee

2.50%

Spa & Fi t nes s

80. 0%

$

( 2, 277, 600) $

( 42) $

( 52) $

( 15, 184)

Contingency

F&B ( Banquet )

80. 0%

$

( 6, 832, 800) $

( 125) $

( 156) $

( 45, 552)

22%

65. 0%

$

( 555, 165) $

( 10) $

( 13) $

( 3, 701)

$

( 17, 779, 515) $

( 325) $

( 406) $

( 118, 530)

Unallocated E xpens es

7%

Marketing Costs 2% TI Allowance

57% Initial Leasing Cost

A Monthly amount per stablization

( 30) $

( 37) $

( 10, 857)

Ut ili t i es & Ser vi ces

3. 0%

$

( 1, 221, 363) $

( 22) $

( 28) $

( 8, 142)

$

( 8, 753, 102) $

( 160) $

( 200) $

( 58, 354)

Contingency 28%

259

324

94,530

Financing Costs

Building Ammenities

5%

Operating Costs (During Stablization) Subtotal 4%

($4,000)

$ (1.89) $ (662,121) 5.0%

$ (0.09) $ (33,106)

From 5% to 10% of Subtotal Costs; Varies by previous project experience

$ (1.99) $ (695,227)

Origination Fee

1.000%

$ (0.49) $ (172,123)

Broker's Fee

0.500%

$ (0.25) $ (86,061)

A negotiated percentage fee of the total loan amount

Title Insurance

0.700%

$ (0.22) $ (77,592)

A market rate of the total assett valuation (acquisition & hard cost only)

Mortgage Recording Tax

1.875%

$ (0.92) $ (322,730)

a set fee of the total loan amount

$ (0.03) $ (10,000)

A miscellaneous lender total

Pr oper t y Taxes ( All ocat ed)

4. 0%

$

( 1, 628, 484) $

( 30) $

( 37) $

( 10, 857)

I ns ur ance

1. 0%

$

( 407, 121) $

( 7) $

( 9) $

( 2, 714)

Repl acement Res er ve

3. 0%

$

( 1, 221, 363) $

( 22) $

( 28) $

( 8, 142)

Contingency 4%

Management Fees

3. 0%

$

( 1, 221, 363) $

( 22) $

( 28) $

( 8, 142)

4%

Subt ot al

$

( 4, 478, 331) $

( 82) $

( 102) $

( 29, 856)

T otal E xpens es

$

(31,010,948) $

( 566) $

( 708) $

( 206, 740)

177

221

64,674

A brokered fee based on the gross initial lease amount

A total dollar amount; Varies by extent of marketing effort

( 1, 628, 484) $

$

From $0 to $25 per Net SF; Varies by extent of marketing effort

A total dollar amount; Varies by extent of marketing effort

$

$

$ (0.72) $ (251,121)

$ (0.27) $ (96,000)

4. 0%

$

$ (5.00) $ (225,000)

$ (0.01) $ (5,000)

Repai r s & Mai nt enance

9,701,153

45,000 30.00%

A total dollar amount; Varies by extent of marketing effort

Sales Office 8%

$

$ (7.32) $ (2,561,069)

A total dollar amount; Varies by extent of marketing effort

11% Sales Events

( 16, 285)

24%

A percentage of the total project cost; varies by deal From 5% to 10% of Subtotal Costs; Varies by previous project experience

$ (0.06) $ (20,000)

( 23, 070)

( 56) $

Net O perating Income

$ (0.35) $ (121,956)

$ (0.07) $ (25,000)

( 79) $

( 45) $

F ixed E xpenes es

$ (1.23) $ (430,000) $ (6.97) $ (2,439,114)

5.0%

$ (0.03) $ (10,000)

( 63) $

( 2, 442, 726) $

$

A miscellaneous contingency for unforeseen expenses A monthly fee; Varies by deal

Collateral Media (Print, Web, Etc.)

( 3, 460, 529) $

$

An annual assessed tax per existing records

$ (0.01) $ (5,000) $ (0.63) $ (220,800)

A total dollar amount; Varies by extent of marketing effort

$

$

A Market rate per $1,000 of Total Hard Cost

A total dollar amount; Varies by extent of marketing effort

$

14,179,484

A Monthly amount per existing records

$ (0.03) $ (10,000)

6. 0%

$

$ -

PR

8. 5%

35%

$ (192,000) $ (0.17) $ (60,861) $ -

$ (0.06) $ (20,000)

Sal es & Mar ket i ng

G ros s O perating P rofit

A total dollar amount; Varies by site conditions A total dollar amount; Varies by project size/construction types employed

Marketing

Gener al & Admin

Subt ot al

$0 $4,600

Subtotal

Subt ot al

$5.75

A total dollar amount; Varies by project size

$ (0.03) $ (10,000) $ (0.03) $ (10,000) ($4,000)

Development Overhead

Department E xpens es

Tel ephone & Ot her

$ (15,000)

2%

Surveys & Investigations

Construction Testing & Inspections 100%

5%

Lender Fees/Reports/DD

1% Subtotal

A negotiated percentage fee of the total loan amount

$ (1.91) $ (668,506) 5.0%

$ (0.10) $ (33,425)

From 5% to 10% of Subtotal Costs; Varies by previous project experience

$ (2.01) $ (701,932)

Interest Reserve 14% Lender Inspection Fees

($500)

$ (0.05) $ (18,000)

A negotiated percentage fee of the total loan amount

Interest Carry

6.250%

$ (6.15) $ (2,151,536)

A market rate

100%

Total Project Costs

$ (6.20) $ (2,169,536)

$ (49.18) $ (17,212,289)

Rendering of Aerial View into Project and the BBP

Rendering of Interior of Hotel Rooms

Rendering of Big Opening

Rendering of Skybridge Pool

Rendering of Waterfront View

Project Circulation

SHANXI TATUNG SOLAR POWER EXPO RESTAURANT SHANXI TATUNG COMPETITION Shanxi

China

2012 Summer YB Design Studio Architectural Intern Restaurant Design Collaboration: Yan Mon, Wang Jing, Chen Jinyuan Principle: Steve Shih

Project Concept The main ideas of the competition 1. Design an underground architecture 2. Connect the project to the Park 3. Sustainability 4. Corresponding to the surrounding The design approach of the project is that designing of an earth-sheltered architecture, and integrated an observatory to create visual connection to the park. In terms of sustainability, the whole project uses green roof to process and storage the water; lastly, solar power to generate electricity.

Ground Floor Plan

Longitudinal Section

Cross Section

Rendering of View from the front

Rendering of Aerial View

Rendering of View from the back

Rendering of Sunken Plaza

RADIOLARIAN ARC 563 Computer Application 2012 Fall Using MAYA to compute an organic creature - Radiolarian Photoshop to post editing the rendering Instructor: Amber Bartosh

Conde’ Nast Building ARC 423 ADVANCED BUILDING SYSTEM 2011 Spring Analyze Building System Propose Improvements Based on Study Collaborated with Xiao Chen, Wei- Yi Tzeng, and Wanjing Xiao

Syracuse School of Architecture

Exercise 1: Building Analysis of Condé Nast 4 Times Square

Fall 2011

Bui Geographic location

June 21st

Humid Continental Climate (Warm Summer)

8am

72.7 Humid Continental Climate: A hot (or very warm) version of a continental climate features an average temperature of at least 22 °C (71.6 °F) in its warmest month. The warmest month is usually July, though in some cases, it can be in August. In this region, July afternoon temperatures average up to 32 °C (90 °F), while the January mean temperature can be far below −3 °C (26.6 °F).

Sum

June 21st 10am Winters are cold and damp,

June 21st

12pm

June 21st

4pm

June 21st

7pm

and prevailing wind patterns that blow offshore minimize the moderating effects of the Atlantic Ocean. Yet the Atlantic and the partial shielding of the Appalachians keep the city warmer in the winter than inland North American cities

25.8

11 Hours at least 25% of Four Times Square’s surface is under direct sunlight

Geographic Influence

o

o

6 Hours at least 60% of Four Times Square’s surface is under direct sunlight

" the urban heat island effect".

It is caused by the large number of buildings, sidewalks and other surfaces that limit green growt such as grass and trees. Surfaces with green areas offer high moisture levels that cool the air when the moisture evaporates from soil and plants.

Dec. 21st

8am

June 21st

11pm

Wint

June 21st

12pm

June 21st

2pm

June 21st

4pm

8 Hours at least 25% of Four Times Square’s surface is under direct sunlight 3 Hours at least 50% of Four Times Square’s surface is under direct sunlight

Exercise Shadow 1: Building Analysis of Condé Nast 4 TimesBillboard Square studies / Skyline

Syracuse School of Architecture

Fall 2011

Exercise 1: Building Analysis of Condé Nast 4 Times Square

Building andI Site 20.October 2011

By Chen, Shih, Tseng,ARC Xiao 423_623

47th fl. - 52th fl.

Core: 21, 248 sq. ft.

Rentable Space: 0 sq.ft.

Total: 21,248

Fall 2011

52

Programming

Exercise 1: Building Analysis of Condé Nast 4 Times Square In Four Time Squares, the architect designs the core as the primary load bearing structure; therefore, concrete is being used. Yet, the frame structure that the architect designs have a clear idea that free up the interior space from bearing walls; as a result, this will generate more profit.

38th fl. - 46th fl.

Core: 5,713 sq.ft.

Rentable Space: 24,000 sq.ft.

Total: 24,831

Syracuse School of Architecture

Professor M Pelken

27. September 2011 I By Chen, Shih, Tseng, Xiao

Core

38

Steel Frame

27th fl. - 37th fl.

Core: 6,828 sq.ft.

Rentable Space: 24,000 sq.ft.

Total: 27,491

27 Conference

17th fl. - 26th fl.

Core: 6,828 sq.ft.

Rentable Space: 24,000 sq.ft.

Total: 30,494

17

9th fl. - 16th fl.

Core: 8,075 sq.ft.

Rentable Space: 24,000 sq.ft.

Total: 33,580

9 Ground Lobby

8th fl.

Core: 8075 sq.ft.

Rentable Space: 24,000 sq.ft.

Total: 39,000

Circulation Core

8

Lobby Core: first layer

Frame Structure: second layer

G

Office

20. October. 2011 I By Chen, Shih, Tseng, Xiao

Loading zone Service Footer should be placed here

Beams: primary

Beams: secondary

Retail

Ground fl. -7th fl.

Core: 8075 sq.ft.

Lobby: 11,077 sq.ft.

Rentable Space: 24000 sq.ft.

Total: 44,395

Office space

Footer should be placed here

20. October. 2011 I By Chen, Shih, Tseng, Xiao

Structure System

Professor M Pelken

ARC 423_623

Buildin

Syracuse School of Architecture Building Analysis of Condé Nast 4 Times Square Syracuse School of Architecture Fall 2011 Exercise 1: Building Analysis Exercise of Condé1:Nast 4 Times Square Syracuse School of Architecture Fall 2011 Exercise 1: Building Analysis of Condé Nast 4 Times Square

Percentage and Quality of Openings

COOLING TOWER NATURAL GAS WATER

Cooling tower Water tank Fuel (Natural gas) Absorption

power converter from AC to DC

Chiller/Heater

HOT WATER CHILLED WATER

Photovolatic panel

Fall 201

Heating / Cooling

Found on the 37th to 43rd floor, south and east side of the facade.

The PV panels are integrated in the spandrel, doubling as both cirtain wall and power generator.

Supply up to 15kw of power

conduit housing in channel structure

46F pv cell

45F 44F 43F 42F 41F 40F 39F 38F 37F 36F

West 78% 20. October 20. October 2011 I By Chen, Shih, Tseng, Xiao 27. September 2011 I By Chen, Shih, Tseng, Xiao

South

59%

2011 I By Chen, Shih, Tseng, Xiao

East

52%

North

Electrical system Structural Systems

76% Mechanics System

ARC 423_623 ARC 423_623

Professor M Pelken Professor M Pelken

Professor M Pelken

ARC 423_6

Syracus

Exercise 2: Building Intervention of CondĂŠ Nast 4 Times Square Installation

Raised Ceiling Eliminating Air Duct

Modularized Floor Pattern

Unefficien

9� Raised Floor For Data System, Electricity and Air Duct

Building Intervention of Condé Nast Nast 4 Times Square rcise 1: Building Analysis of Condé 4 Times Square hool of Architecture Fall 2011Syracuse School of Architecture In the existing typical floor plan, the partition walls are constructed to reroute electricity circuit. To free up the tenant space, the concrete floor can be lifted up for 9 inches to allow electricity and air duct run under the floor. This also increases the floor height Air Filtration by eliminating the air duct in the drop ceiling, which brings more natural light into the office space.

Fall 2011

SyracuseSyracuse School ofSchool Architecture Fall 2011 Fall 2011 of Architecture

ly Rely on Mechanic System / Cooling

COMBINED HOUSE TANK DOMESTIC WATER STORAGE: 10, 500 GAL. TOTAL FIRE RESERVE: 10, 000 GAL. TOTAL

COMPARTMENT HOUSE TANK DOMESTIC WATER STORAGE: 8,000 GAL. TOTAL FIRE RESERVE: 10, 000 GAL. TOTAL

PRESSURE REDUCED ZONE LOCATED ON 39TH, 28TH, 25TH, 19, AND 12TH FLOOR TO REDUCE PIPE PRESSURE ACCUMULATED FROM MULTIPLE FLOORS.

Low Ceiling

Fixed Floor Lay Out

Unefficient Conventional System

Exhaust Pipe Hot Water Pipe Cold Water Pipe

EJECTOR DISCHARGE THE WASTE WATER INTO SEWER SYSTEM. AVERAGE FLOW: 0.18 CFS, PEAK FLOW: 0.76 CFS

SUCTION TANK STORAGE: 10,000 GAL. TOTAL BRING IN FRESH WATER FROM SERVICE MAIN

r Duct

1 I By Xiao Chen, Wei-yi CliffordXiao Shih, Wanjing Xiao, Abigail Hutchins ctober 2011 I By Chen,Tseng, Shih, Tseng, Professor

ystem

Sustainable Components

M Pelken

Mechanics System ARC 423_623

ntervention: Raise Floor

Professor M Pelken

Professor M Pelken

ARC 423_623

Overall Problems Mechanics System ARC 423_623

Professor M Pelken

ARC 423_623 ARC 423_623 Professor M Pelken

Exercise 2: Building Intervention of CondĂŠ Nast 4 Times Square

Syracuse School of Architecture

Fall 2011

Green Roof

Green Wall

Original Condition 06. December. 2011 I By Xiao Chen, Wei-yi Tseng, Clifford Shih, Wanjing Xiao, Abigail Hutchins

Proposed Condition

Comparison

Professor M Pelken

ARC 423_623

Exercise 2: Building Intervention of CondĂŠ Nast 4 Times Square

Syracuse School of Architecture

Fall 2011

Green Wall

Raised Floor

Original Condition 06. December. 2011 I By Xiao Chen, Wei-yi Tseng, Clifford Shih, Wanjing Xiao, Abigail Hutchins

Proposed Condition

Comparison

Professor M Pelken

ARC 423_623

SIMMONS HALL FACADE STUDY ARC 578 Facade as Idea 2012 Spring Instructor: Randle Korman AutoCAD 2D Drafting, Rhino 3D Model, Illustrator Diagram Simmons Hall at MIT Architects: Steven Holl Architects Location: Cambridge, Massachusetts

Structure Grid

Shadow Study

Line Drawing

Facade System

Figure Ground

Three Buildings

CLIFFORD SHIH

clifford1320@gmail.com

p:315-247-6508