ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN PORTFOLIO CLIFFORD SHIH RECENT WORK (315)247 - 6508
CONTENT 01
PAC 12 CONFERENCE AND OFFICE ARCHITECTURAL INTERIOR OFFICE T.I.
02
GANNNETT / KING 5 TV STATION
03
WATER GARDEN SITE
04
ARCHITECTURAL INTERIOR BROADCAST & OFFICE T.I.
SITE REPOSITION
THE LOOKOUT ARCHITECTURE EXTERIOR REPOSITION
05
REVITALIZING WATERFRONT - THE SINKING CITY Thesis Project Instructor: Julie Larson, Yutaka Sho
06
URBAN SPONGE - Massive Change Instructor: Shawn Rickenbecker, Rickenbacker & Leung
07
HOUSE KINO MUSIC SCHOOL Instructor: J端rgen Johner, J端rgen Johner Architekten
08
URBAN TRANSVERING - The Brooklyn Bridge Park Instructor: Jared Valle, AJ Pires, DellaValle Pires
09
SHANXI TATUNG SOLAR POWER EXPO RESTAURANT- SHANXI TATUNG COMPETITION
10
RADIOLARIAN
Design Internship - YB Design Studio, Shanghai, China
Instructor: Amber Bartosh
11
ADVANCED BUILDING SYSTEM - ARC 423 Instructor: Michael Pelken
12
SIMMONS HALL FACADE - ARC 500 Facade as Idea Instructor: Randle Korman
-
-
PAC 12 CONFERENCE & OFFICE SPACE SAN FRANCISCO CA 32,000 SF Architectural Interior T.I. OямГce Project 2013
Entry Wall
Entry Wall with Light Box
Feature Wall
Technology Feature Wall
PAC 12 Feature Wall with Banquette
Pantry
Open OďŹƒce
Softball Wall
Open Team Meeting Space
Light Box Display
GANNETT KING 5 TV OFFICE & BROADCAST SPACE SEATTLE
WA
50,000 SF Architectural Interior T.I. OямГce & Broadcast Project 2014
-
Perspective @ Newsroom
Perspective @ Pantry and Stairs
Perspective @ Coee Area
Perspective @ Secure Recepion Area
16
17
19
18
25' - 0"
25' - 0"
20
25' - 0"
21
25' - 0"
22
25' - 0"
23
25' - 0"
24
25' - 0"
25
25' - 0"
25.8
25' - 0"
21' - 10"
NEW DAY 239
EVENING MAGAZINE 238
CONFERENCE ROOM 229
INVESTIGATIVE REPORTERS 228
EVENING MAGAZINE 238
VO ROOM 227
27
3' - 2"
14' - 6"
2' - 8"
HUDDLE ROOM 225 ENGINEERING / OPS MANAGER 242
26
EXEC. NEWS DIRECTOR 215
VO ROOM 226
A A2
12' - 1"
15
NEWS MANAGER 216
B
DISPLAY 235
MONITOR 24"
4
SECURE STORAGE 234
PHONE ROOM 222
REF
18 '-6 "
23' - 1"
24" MONITOR
24" MONITOR
IT 233
B2
MONITOR 24"
MONITOR 24"
24" MONITOR
SECURE EQUIPMENT STORAGE 236
COPY/ SUPPLIES 237
Room 244
NEWS FLASHCAM 213
CONFERENCE ROOM 217
PHONE ROOM 223
MONITOR
COLLABORATION 243
PHONE ROOM 224 INVESTIGATE 230
24"
EVENING MAGAZINE 231
SECURE EQUIPMENT STORAGE 232
12' - 6"
NEWS STAND-UP 212
COFFEE BAR 245
12 '-0 "
MEDIA / PREP 221
GENERAL/ STATION MANAGER 251
COLLABORATION 218
REF
Y2 DISPLAY 246
Y3
X1
REF
C
DN
1.3 HUDDLE ROOM 248
CR
NEWS ROOM 211
ELEVATOR CORRIDOR 201
DN
HUDDLE ROOM 249
X2
B7
3
41' - 4 3/4"
ASSISTANTS 250
HUDDLE ROOM 247
30 '-6 "
IT RISER CLOSET 220
PANTRY AREA 219
8' - 11"
6' 6"
DISPLAY 252
30 '-8 "
26' - 2"
Y1
DISPLAY 204
HUDDLE ROOM 203
1.5 MAKEUP 206
DN
CR
D
MARKETING SUITE 207
DN
SECURE STORAGE 208
HUDDLE ROOM 209
COPY/ PRINT 210
4
30' - 0"
MARKETING 205
24 '-6 "
1.4
X3
28 '-6 "
D7
14' - 6"
X4
E
30 '-6 "
2' - 8"
11 '-4 "
12' - 1"
X5
10 '-4 "
19 '-6 "
X5.5
X6 XA
Plan @ 2nd Floor
XB
XC
E8 F
B2
B
A2
C
A
1.3
1.4
1.5
D
4
PLASTIC LAMINTE COUNTERTOP (PL-4)
PT-4
BASE CABINETS (PL-2) GL-2
GL-2
GL-2
GL-2
EQ
EQ
GL-2
GL-2
2' - 10 1/2"
8' - 2"
GL-2
8' - 2"
GL-2
RUBBER BASE (RB-1)
8' - 2"
G1 A903
2 EQ
EQ
EQ
EQ
EQ
EQ
EQ
EQ
13' - 10 1/8" @ (8) EQ PANELS
RUBBER BASE (RB-1)
G7
F7
ELEVATION COPY 309
1/2" = 1'-0"
ELEVATION HR 335 CONTROLLER 336 CONFERENCE ROOM 337 GLASS WALL
1/2" = 1'-0"
SINK FAUCET
24
JUST MFG. MOEN
EQ
EQ
23' - 5 3/8"
C7
1/2" = 1'-0"
ELEVATION PRESENTATION ROOM 319 FRONT
US-1824-A-18 87350E
B
PAINTED GYP. SOFFIT SOLID STONE SHELVING (SS-1) 3 2 WG PT-6
3
PT-3
2' - 0"
G1 A903
E5 A903
E1 A903
BASE CABINETS FINISH ENDS (PL-2)
9' - 0"
SOLID STONE COUNTERTOP (SS-1)
9' - 0"
B1 A904
BASE CABINETS FINISH ENDS (PL-1)
GL-4
2' - 10 1/2"
2
G1 A903
RUBBER BASE RB-1) REFRIGERATOR GE CZS25TSE
EQ
EQ
EQ
1' - 6"
1' - 6"
2' - 0"
EQ
EQ
EQ
EQ
EQ
EQ
DISHWASHER BOSCH SGE63E15UC
3
SCHEDULED BASE (RB-1)
9' - 0"
EQ
EQ
PLASTIC LAMINTE COUNTERTOP (PL-4) BASE CABINETS (PL-2) FINISH ENDS
GL-2
1' - 6 7/8"
1' - 6 7/8"
1' - 6 7/8"
1' - 6 7/8"
1' - 6 7/8"
1' - 6 7/8"
1' - 6 7/8"
1' - 6 7/8"
1' - 6 7/8"
1' - 6 7/8"
1' - 6 7/8"
1' - 6 7/8"
1' - 6 7/8"
1' - 6 7/8"
22' - 0" @ (14) EQ PANELS
F3
ELEVATION COPY 315
RUBBER BASE (RB-1)
C3
ELEVATION G/O & EXPANSION 324 MILLWORK
1/2" = 1'-0"
D
4
SOLID STONE SHELFING (SS-2)
SOLID STONE COUNTERTOP (SS-2) PT-3
SOLID STONE SHELFING (SS-2)
COUNTERTOP BACKSPLASH (GL-4)
WG
SOLID STONE COUNTERTOP (SS-2)
14' - 2 5/8"
G1 A903
BASE CABINETS FINISH ENDS (PL-2) RUBBER BASE (RB-1)
E5 A903
RUBBER BASE (RB-1)
REFRIGERATOR GE CZS25TSE
2
VENDING MACHINE (OFOI)
1/2" = 1'-0"
SCHEDULED BASE (RB-1)
ELEVATION COFFEE 306 NORTH WALL MILLWORK
EQ
EQ
1' - 7 1/2"
1' - 8 1/2"
4
6' - 10 1/2" 3
E1
1/2" = 1'-0"
4
BASE CABINETS (PL-2) FINISH ENDS
B1 A904
G1 A903
2' - 10 1/2"
GL-4
2' - 0"
9' - 0" 2' - 0"
E1 A903
B3
ELEVATION COLLABORATION 328 WALL
1/2" = 1'-0"
SINK JUST MFG. US-1824-A-18 FAUCET MOEN 87350E
G1
GL-2
RUBBER BASE (RB-1)
2
2
2' - 10 1/2"
1/2" = 1'-0"
ELEVATION COPY 333
B2
G1 A903
9' - 0"
G3
EQ
2' - 10 1/2"
2' - 10 1/2"
EQ
1/2" = 1'-0"
A
2
RUBBER BASE (RB-1)
EQ
B5
PERSPECTIVE @ 3RD FLOOR PANTRY
PT-7
BASE CABINETS FINISH ENDS (PL-2)
SCHEDULED BASE (RB-1) EQ
A2
PLASTIC LAMINTE COUNTERTOP (PL-4)
G1 A903
D5
3
B
PT-4
EQ
6' - 6" @ (4) EQ PANELS
2
18' - 4 3/4"
ELEVATION PANTRY 325 MILLWORK
EQ
8' - 2"
EQ
1/2" = 1'-0"
RUBBER BASE (RB-1)
SCHEDULED BASE (RB-1) EQ
G5
PLASTIC LAMINTE COUNTERTOP (PL-4)
MICROWAVE GE CEB1590SS
18' - 4 5/8"
2' - 10 1/2"
GL-2
1' - 8 1/2"
2' - 0"
DISHWASHER BOSCH SGE63E15UC
ELEVATION COFFEE 306 EAST WALL MILLWORK
EQ
1' - 4 3/8"
2' - 8 5/8"
6' - 9 5/8" @ (5) EQ PANELS
EQ
2
3
SCHEDULED BASE (RB-1)
B1
PERSPECTIVE @ 3RD FLOOR COFFEE 306
PERSPECTIVE @ COLLABORATION 328 WALL
2
ALL IGN
Isometric @ Pantry and Stairs
-
-
WATER GARDEN SITE EXTERIOR REFRESH SANTA MONICA
CA
Site Reposition Project 2013
3
2
1
5
4
6
8
7
9
11
10
12
14
13
15
16
19
18
17
20
22
21
23
25
24
26
28
27
29
31
30
32
34
33
35
36
A
B LIMIT OF WORK
LIMIT OF WORK
12
12
16
19 1
1
LIMIT OF WORK
WEST VEHICULAR DROP-OFF
LIMIT OF WORK
1
16
12
16
16
12
16
EAST VEHICULAR DROP-OFF
30
C 7
1
7 13
13 1
D
1 23
LIMIT OF WORK
E IT M LI F O W K R O
F
2450 COLORADO AVENUE
R K O
K R O
O F O F
W
O
R K
B
LI M IT
LIMIT OF WORK
A
LI M IT
1
K LIMIT OF WORK
9 11
30
9
1601 CLOVERFIELD BOULEVARD
LIMIT OF WORK
30
8 28
N
1620 26TH STREET
8
23
MATCHLINE - SEE A312S
11
29
28
19
LI M IT
28
R K O W O F LI M IT
1 1
28
C
U
D
17
1
23
W
MATCHLINE - SEE A313S
K R O
K R O
W
W
MATCHLINE - SEE A312S
V
F O
F O
IT M LI
28
IT M LI
2425 W. OLYMPIC BOULEVARD
13
T
16
23
LIMIT OF WORK
LIMIT OF WORK
24
R 30
S LIMIT OF WORK
O
R K
14
O F
Q
LIMIT OF WORK
LIMIT OF WORK
29
16
1
30
LIMIT OF WORK
9
MATCHLINE - SEE A313S
9
GREAT LAWN 28
30
30
MATCHLINE - SEE A311S
13
1
26
19
P
10 TYP. 18
W
M 16
MAIN PLAZA
8
LIMIT OF WORK
MATCHLINE - SEE A310S
16
L
23
17 9
30
LIMIT OF WORK
9
7
14
1
16 J
8
30
G
H 1
W
W
K R O
F O
W
LIMIT OF WORK
O F
W
O
R K
1
LI M IT
MATCHLINE - SEE A310S
LIMIT OF WORK
F O
IT M LI
IT M LI
24
MATCHLINE - SEE A311S
24
23
X
Y
Z
1
28
LIMIT OF WORK
1
16
16 1
AA 28
1 1
28
30 1
BB
LIMIT OF WORK
11
1
CC
11
16 GATEWAY PLAZA
23
13
DD 23
10 TYP. EE
Overall Site Plan
Central Plaza
Pavilion
Gateway Plaza
Gateway Plaza
LEVEL 3
LEVEL 2
PLAZA LEVEL
Pavilion and Building Relationship
Pedestrian Drop O
Overhang
Walls 3-coat exterior plaster
20’
exterior plaster
14’ 1/4”
FRONT ELEVATION
20’
Seating Cast-in place concrete with wood seating surface (ipe or similar sustainable hardwood species)
Climbing Vegetation on 3/16” Steel Cables
Wood (ipe or similar susteainable hardwood species)
11’ 6”
TYPICAL PAVILION VIGNETTE REAR ELEVATION
40’
14’ 1/4” 11’ 6”
Pavilion
SIDE ELEVATION
-
-
THE LOOKOUT 12655 W JEFFERSON BLVD MARINA DEL RAY
CA
Architecture Exterior Reposition Project 2013
Aerial View
Front Entrance
Front Entrance
Reception Area
Reception Area
Reception Area
1st Floor Plan
Sectional Perspective
REVITALIZING WATERFRONT THE SINKING CITY Shanghai
China
2013 Spring Thesis Project Architectural Design Solution to Solve the Issue of the Sinking City Water Filtration Plant, Ports Terminal, and Public Space
Y g Zh
u
T
h u
Nantong
g
ji g
W i S
REVITALIZING WATERFRONT THE SINKING CITY
Hu hou
The effects of transitional water ecological situations are radically changing the way Shanghai is living. The realities of water used to be the gestation of Chinese civiliztion has now proved to be a threat to Shanghai. A waterfront condition at the Bund, the edge of Huangpu River, Shanghai, China has manifested the sinking of Shanghai. As the process of soaring water and sinking city sprawls, the submergence deviates the spatial and structural conditions of the Bund and surrounding waterfront condition. Shanghai is strongly bond with Huangpu River. The city itself is formed by the Yangtze River, to the civilization lives near the river, to the occupying by West; nonetheless, to the most occupied ports in China. Though water is critical to Shanghai’s development, Shanghai is sinking.
u
an zho
i i g
H
aiz o
enjian Nan n
h u
Baoshan
Jiangsu Changzhou
uzho
Zhoushan S China
Yangte River Delta
N
Jiading
ux
z
8
5
21
9 Pudong
3
J ax n
bo
7 6 4
Qingpu
Shanghai
Minhang
Nanhui
Songjiang
angz o
Zhejiang
haoxing
ing
Taizhou u
1910s
Fengxian Jinshan
1
1990s
Huangpu
2010s
SITE PLAN 1920
PeopleM
2000
0.725”/YEAR
lower 58”
echanical
urban
urban
boundary
hybrid water
lower 72”
2010 1.4”/YEAR
filtrate water private
cross river public
cross river public
filtrate water private
eop
ec an ca
water
Water Treatment Plant
Port Terminal
Restaurant
Project Location
Program
Structure - Module
Program Break Down
The project locates next to the Shanghai bund, in which built to prevent water flooded into the city, functions as an embankment. The project tends to propose a new method to solve the issue of water while maintain interaction with water.
The programs of the project consist a water treatment plant, a port terminal, and a public space. Starting with three buildings that accommodate the programs, yet each programs require more space than a level. As a result, more programs are designed to be underground so that the project wouldn’t become a boundry between urban space and water space.
The project uses a designed module with its repetition and stacking forming the structure, this structure serves as the facade, and circulation as well
Even though the programs were defined on the upper level, when they go to underground level (B1, B2) these programs connect extrude water from huangpu river
send water down to filtration process
first level water filtration
second level water filtration
Water Hole
clean water send to underground aquafiers
mud process
clean water send to underground aquafiers
Water Hole clean water send to underground aquafiers
Water Hole
Carving Exterior - Deformation
Entrance & Exit
Water Hole & Vertical Circulation
Water Circulation
Carving out the roof, the original box form of the project was subtracted by the spheres in order to fit with the site for the sunlight, and introducing the skylight into the project
The entrance and exit was clearfully design to fit with the module structure so that when entering or existing the project, people are always walking in or out to the carve out space.
One of the main goals in this project was to clean the water from Huangpu River, and send the clean water down to underground aquafiers. After the filtration process, water are send to the aquafiers from water holes. These water holes also function as vertical circulation
The water movement in Huangpu River runs from South to North; therefore, the water pump stations are set to be at the South and the highest level. With the gravity force, the water filtration process are designed to flow from ground level into underground level
E
D
E
C
D C
1 3 2
3
2
1
1
10
4
4 17
D D
C
C
B 5
B 7
17
10 6
5
6
15
10 A
17 A
5 9
14
16
10
8
12
7
11
17
13
GROUND FLOOR PLAN E
B 11
B
A
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
Entrance to Water Treatment Plant Water Pump Station Locker Office & Monitor Desk Entrance to Ports Terminal Lobby Shops Ticketing Information Storage Entrance to Restaurant Indoor Seating Kitchen Outdoor Seating Ports Water Hole Vertical Circulation Ground Floor Plan 1’ = 1 / 32”
N
10 9 8 A
E
BASEMENT 1 FLOOR PLAN
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Office Mechanical Room Storage Water Tank Shops Seating Indoor Seating Kitchen Storage Vertical Circulation Water Hole
Basement One Plan 1’ = 1 / 32”
N
VIEW FROM WATERFRONT
VIEW FROM STREET
Module Design Structure
Facade
Water Tank
The project is designed through a module that will have the ability to function as four purposes Structure, Facade, Water Tank, and Circulation. Through the x and y axis of repetition, the module becomes the structure that creating floor plates as well as supporting structure for the architecture. The facade is the repetition of modules. Water Tank is designed in the module. Water tank requires higher sturctural support; therefore, the buttom of the module becomes underground. The circulation of the project are divided into water and people. Water is going along the x-axis and people are going in the y-axis. Though the circulation are divided, people and water are always interact with each other through visual and spatial relationship.
WALL DETAILED SECTION
Section through Ports Terminal
Section A 1’ = 1 / 8”
Section through Public Space
URBAN SPONGE Massive Change New York City
NY
2012 Fall VC Studio Rickenbacker & Leung Architectural Design Solution to Solve the Issue of URBAN AIR POLLUTION Collaborated with Chao Dou
URBAN SPONGE Massive Change The project is situated on Canal St. and Varick St. Right on the exist of Holland Tunnel. New York City is considered as one of the most polluted city in the world. We are proposing a prototype of air filtration architecture that will have the ability to filter the polluted air from the city and then return the cleaned air into the city. The idea of the project is absorbing nature of sponge as a porous object, filtering the polluted air through the designed facade; finally, returning the filtered air to the city.
Polluted Air
Air Filtration Process
Urban Sponge
Clean Air
site pedestrian circulation
create oppurtunity for pedestrians to move across the project yet 1st floor serve as a public space
filtration surrounds the site
park space near site
macro climate micro climate
?
macro climate
uran smog
uran traffic
with the filtration surround the project, this create an oppurtunity to have macro vs micro climate situation
5 volumes to house the program
what can we do to filter air ?
absorbing air
clean urban air
plan 1st floor
n
the impermeable surface would create air resistant
UP
UP
PROGRAM
2
1
1 AUDITORIAN AUDITORIAN STORAGE BACKROOM
UP
5,200 SQ-FT
3
2 ADMISSION FRONT DESK COAT CHECK FRONT OFFICE M/F RESTROOM STORAGE ELEVATOR X 2 FIRE STAIRS 2,810 SQ-FT
5 4
porous opening allows for air to penetrate through the box
3 EXHIBITIOON EXHIBITION 2,500 SQ-FT 4 CAFE
plan 2nd floor
SEATINGS KITCHEN 3,000 SQ-FT
plan 3rd floor
5 CORE 1,595 SQ-FT
n
the lifted porous box allows for air circulation and public access to the site
GROUND FLOOR PLAN
PROGRAM
2
1
PROGRAM
2
1
1 library
1 laborat
5,300 SQ-FT 2 classroom M/F RESTROOM STORAGE ELEVATOR X 2 FIRE STAIRS 3,100 SQ-FT
3
5
3 classroom class x 2 3,250 SQ-FT
4
5,50
2 lounge M S EL FI 3,00
3
5
3 office
4
o 3,55
4 classroom class
4 office
of
3,000 SQ-FT
SECOND FLOOR PLAN
5 CORE 1,595 SQ-FT
n
3,00
THIRD FLOOR PLAN
5 CORE 1,59
wall section rooftop
70’-0”
skin
65’-0”
1 2 3
filtration 62 62’-0” 0 5
4
4th 4 th floor fllo oo or r 49’-6” 49 6
3rd floor 37’-6”
2nd floor 25’-6”
6 7
filtration 12 12’-6” 6
1st floor 0’-6” r road 0’-0” 0 0
1 tal str t r rti al 2 tal str t r hori ontal 3 l tri n rator 4 h pa filt r 5 l tri al parti l har r filt r 6 r infor tal str t r 7 tal st r t r
wall section diagram air in
absorb dirty air
air out
exhuast clean air
an one absorb exhuast air rein orce structure
electrical article char er
trans arent
solid
trans arent
solid
he a ilter
s in
Aerial View of URBAN SPONGE
Street View of URBAN SPONGE
House KinO Music School Villa Renovention Hamburg
Germany
2011 Spring Comprehensive Studio Renovention of A Villa Into A Modern Music School Collaborated with Jeffery Cheung King & King Competition -- 1st Prize
1
2
3
4
5
6
7 8
9
10
11
12
A Classroom
B Orchestra Pit
C
Courtyard
Entrance
Classroom M
F
D UP E
Classroom
Public Lobby Caf’e
Academic Lobby
Lecture Hall
F G Dean’s Office
Conference
Office
Office
Office
H I
Storage
M
J
F
Dance Studio
Classroom
K
L
1
2
3
4
5
6
7 8
9
10
11
Classroom
Back Back Stage Stage
Stage
Auditorium Seating Area Level 1
D
Back Stage
Stage
E
Classroom
Wings
Wings
F
F
G
G
H
H
I
I
L
4
C Classroom
F Restroom
E
K
3
Wings
B
M Restroom
C
J
2
A Wings
B
D
1
12
A
Dance Studio Dance Studio
J
Classroom
Classroom
Classroom
Classroom
K
L
Auditorium Seating Area Level 2
5
6
7 8
9
10
11
12
DD#2 Access, Egress, Transport & Core Services System Design - Egress ARC 322 I Building System Design II
Prof. Robert Svetz
I
Clifford Shih and Jeff Cheung
In this project, Hamburg School for the Performing Arts, the occupancy classification is Group E. The total occupant load in Auditorium is 500 people including the performers; therefore, the minimal number of exits is three,yet for a better circulation and evacuation circumstances, the decision is made to have five exits, including three normal exits to the Lobby are, and two exits to the fire stairs. Within the project, there are total of six entrances. The major entrance located on the north facade open for both public event and to the academic portion. The ramp is also another entrance that provides for ground floor entry also allows for outdoor theater and to the academic portion as well. The office area also has its own exit. Within all the dance studio, there are a fire stairs that runs through first floor to thrid floor for better safety. The last exit would be the exit located on the south facade which is specifically for class room and lecture hall. There are two elevators in the school, both located in the school portion; however, still have accessbility to the public auditorim for accessible-needed. In the first floor public lobby space, there are a escalator running both up and down, in order to provide a faster transportaion to the auditorium. In this project, there is no dead-end. Within all the spaces, there are either corridors or doors lead you to the fire stairs or exiteror. The longest distance from a space to the exit is 75 ft.
Occupant Load Auditorium: 350 Seatings = 350 Occupant Stage Area = 1395 sq ft / 15 = 93 Occupant Total: 350+93= 443 Occupant Caf’e:1545 sqft / 15 = 103 Occupant Leecture Hall: 100 Seatings = 100 Occupant stage= 235 sq ft / 15 = 15 Occupant Total 115 Occupant Rehersal Space: 424+441+942 / 7 = 258 Occupant Classroom: 501+322+340+200+450 / 20= 91 Occupant
In the Fourth Floor, There are One Stairs that take you to the auditorium, and also there will be one exterior fire Stairs for the backstage workers and audiencce.
Wings
Back Stage
Auditorium Seating Area Level 2
Stage
Wings
Fourth Floor Plan 1/32’=1”
In the Third Floor, There are One Stairs that take you to the auditorium, and also there will be one exterior fire Stairs for the stage Performer and audiene. In addition, elevators are located in the Dance Studio, and One Fire Stairs is located for evacuation.
Wings
Fire Staircase for Concert Hall Space - 200 People
Stairs run from first to second floor- lead to the north exit
Outdoor Plaza, also, allow access to the basement floor school, it’s also the fire exist for the basement floor
Auditorium Seating Area Level 1
Stage
Back Stage
Wings Restroom
Dance Studio
Fire Exist espicially for lecture hall for 100 people
Third Floor Plan 1/32’=1”
In the Second Floor, There are One Stairs that take you to the auditorium, and also there will be one exterior fire Stairs for the stage Performer and audience. In addition, elevators are located in the Academic Lobby, and One Fire Stairs is located in Dance Studio, the other one is located near all the classroom.
Classroom
Classroom Back Stage
Stage
Auditorium Seating Area Level 1 Classroom
Wings
Dance Studio
Second Floor Plan 1/32’=1”
Classroom
Classroom
Classroom
Classroom
In the First Floor, There are One Escalator that take you to the auditorium,and also there will be one exterior fire Stairs for the auditorium space. In addition, elevators are located in the Academic Lobby, and One Fire Stairs is located in Dance Studio, the other one is located near all the classroom. There are two major entrances, and 4 alternative exits for the schools.
Classroom
Orchestra Pit
Courtyard
Entrance
Classroom M
UP
F
Classroom
Public Lobby Caf’e Ca
There will be two sets of the elevator, in which, it will run through every floors. Exit for first floor for office people the entance and the exit of the house if a ramp that runs through the whole building, an eggress design for east-west circulation
Academic Lobby
Stairs run from first to thrid floor specially for library space lead to the south exit
Dean’s Office f ffice
Conference
Office f ffice
Office f ffice
Lecture Hall
Office f ffice
Storage
M
F
Dance Studio
Egress Design for Private (school) Egress Design for Public (Auditorium)
Classroom
First Floor Plan 1/32’=1”
Egress Design for Accessible-Needed Egress Design for Fire Stairs Egress Design for Normal Stairs
UP
UP
Egress Design for Elevator Ground Floor Plan 1/32’=1”
In the Ground Floor, There are elevator located in the lounge area. On the West Side, there is a ramp can take you back to First Floor, on the East side, there are an outdoor theater that have both stairs and ramp to take you to First Floor
East - West Section 1/16” = 1’ pg 9 / C. Shih and J. Cheung
Longitudinal Section
East - West Section 1/16” = 1’
Sectional Model
Rendering of Lobby Area
Rendering of Underground Pathway
URBAN TRANSVERING The Brooklyn Bridge Park New York City
NY
2010 Fall VC Studio DellaValle Pires Instructor: Jared Valle, AJ Pires Hotel and Residential Complex
URBAN TRANSVERING The Brooklyn Bridge Park Produce an economically viable project that will contribute toward ongoing maintenance and operation of the park Further the vision of the park by designing structures to be seamlessly integrated with and complementary to the site’s surroundings.
Public
Hotel Residential Private Public
Private
Design Progress
UP UP
Hotel Portion
30 Rooms of 500 sf 3 Elevators (including 1 Fire Elevator) 1 Fire Stairs 1 Housekeeping Room 1 Service Room
Residential Portion
UP
UP UP
UP
U U UP UP P
UP U
9 Rooms of 900 sf 3 Elevators (including 1 Fire Elevator) 1 Fire Stairs 2 Open Balconys
Typical Floor (3rd to 5th) Plan 1’ = 1/32” 1
Island / River Quietness Private
Residential
Hotell Manhattan Skyline
Liberty Island
City / Bridge Movement Public
Governors Island
Local Destination
Local Influence
Section 1’ = 1/32”
Project Management Profit & Loss Statement
Brooklyn Bridge Park Budget
Hotel P &L As s umptions Gr oss SF Avail abl e t o Hot el
125, 000
Net SF Avail abl e t o Rooms
75, 000
Net SF t o Ammeni t y
FACTOR
25, 000
Rooms
Construction Stablization
150
Gr oss SF per Room
833 500
Acquisition
Ammeni t ySF per Room
167
Building Acquisition
Maxi mum Room Night s
54, 750
NOTES Months from closing to start of construction
12
Months of construction
24
Months from completion of construction to final sale or lease
$ (1.43) $ (500,000)
Donated by City
$ (1.43) $ (500,000) Hard Costs
$650
Aver age Occupancy
TOTAL
12
48
Net SF per Room
ADR
PSF
Schedule (Months) Pre-Development
Renovation Trade Cost
80. 0%
STABALI ZED
/ NI GHTS
/ OCC NI GHTS
/ ROOM
$
35, 587, 500
Occupi ed Room Revenue
$
28, 470, 000
$ (25.00) $ (8,750,000)
From $0 to $75 per Gross SF; Varies by extent of renovation
$ (25.00) $ (8,750,000)
General Conditions
10.00%
$ (2.50) $ (875,000)
A Market percentage of total trade costs; Varies by project size
Insurance
2.00%
$ (0.55) $ (193,000)
A Market percentage of total trade costs; Varies by project size
Fee, Overhead & Profit
3.00%
$ (0.75) $ (262,500)
A Market percentage of total trade costs; Varies by project size
%
Hard Cost Subtotal Contingency
R oom Income Gr oss Maxi mum Room Revenue
350,000
Total Trade Costs
$ (28.80) $ (10,080,500) 5.0%
$ (1.44) $ (504,025)
From 5% to 10% of Subtotal Costs; Varies by previous project experience
$ (30.24) $ (10,584,525)
$
520
$
650
$
189, 800
Department Income
70% Soft Costs Architect's Fees
10.00%
$ (3.02) $ (1,058,453)
From 6% to 12% of Hard Cost; Varies by project size
Engineer's Fees
2.50%
$ (0.72) $ (252,000)
From 2% to 4% of Hard Cost; Varies by project size
CM / Owner's Rep Fees
$2,500
$ (0.34) $ (120,000)
A Monthly Fee; Varies by required oversight/time commitment
Spa, Fi t nes s or Ot her
10. 0%
$
2, 847, 000
$
52
$
65
$
18, 980
7% Expediting & Permitting Fees
$ (0.14) $ (50,000)
Estimate; Varies by project size/entitlement complexity
Food & Bever age
30. 0%
$
8, 541, 000
$
156
$
195
$
56, 940
Legal - Transactional 21%
$ (0.04) $ (15,000)
A total dollar amount; Varies by transaction volume
Tel ephone & Ot her
3. 0%
$
854, 100
$
16
$
20
$
5, 694
$
40,712,100
$
744
$
930
$
271, 414
T otal G ros s R evenue
Legal - Construction
Utilities Risk & Liability Insurance
R oom E xpens es Rooms
Property Tax
28. 5%
$
( 8, 113, 950) $
( 148) $
( 185) $
( 54, 093)
Community Relations 26% Developer Fee
2.50%
Spa & Fi t nes s
80. 0%
$
( 2, 277, 600) $
( 42) $
( 52) $
( 15, 184)
Contingency
F&B ( Banquet )
80. 0%
$
( 6, 832, 800) $
( 125) $
( 156) $
( 45, 552)
22%
65. 0%
$
( 555, 165) $
( 10) $
( 13) $
( 3, 701)
$
( 17, 779, 515) $
( 325) $
( 406) $
( 118, 530)
Unallocated E xpens es
7%
Marketing Costs 2% TI Allowance
57% Initial Leasing Cost
A Monthly amount per stablization
( 30) $
( 37) $
( 10, 857)
Ut ili t i es & Ser vi ces
3. 0%
$
( 1, 221, 363) $
( 22) $
( 28) $
( 8, 142)
$
( 8, 753, 102) $
( 160) $
( 200) $
( 58, 354)
Contingency 28%
259
324
94,530
Financing Costs
Building Ammenities
5%
Operating Costs (During Stablization) Subtotal 4%
($4,000)
$ (1.89) $ (662,121) 5.0%
$ (0.09) $ (33,106)
From 5% to 10% of Subtotal Costs; Varies by previous project experience
$ (1.99) $ (695,227)
Origination Fee
1.000%
$ (0.49) $ (172,123)
Broker's Fee
0.500%
$ (0.25) $ (86,061)
A negotiated percentage fee of the total loan amount
Title Insurance
0.700%
$ (0.22) $ (77,592)
A market rate of the total assett valuation (acquisition & hard cost only)
Mortgage Recording Tax
1.875%
$ (0.92) $ (322,730)
a set fee of the total loan amount
$ (0.03) $ (10,000)
A miscellaneous lender total
Pr oper t y Taxes ( All ocat ed)
4. 0%
$
( 1, 628, 484) $
( 30) $
( 37) $
( 10, 857)
I ns ur ance
1. 0%
$
( 407, 121) $
( 7) $
( 9) $
( 2, 714)
Repl acement Res er ve
3. 0%
$
( 1, 221, 363) $
( 22) $
( 28) $
( 8, 142)
Contingency 4%
Management Fees
3. 0%
$
( 1, 221, 363) $
( 22) $
( 28) $
( 8, 142)
4%
Subt ot al
$
( 4, 478, 331) $
( 82) $
( 102) $
( 29, 856)
T otal E xpens es
$
(31,010,948) $
( 566) $
( 708) $
( 206, 740)
177
221
64,674
A brokered fee based on the gross initial lease amount
A total dollar amount; Varies by extent of marketing effort
( 1, 628, 484) $
$
From $0 to $25 per Net SF; Varies by extent of marketing effort
A total dollar amount; Varies by extent of marketing effort
$
$
$ (0.72) $ (251,121)
$ (0.27) $ (96,000)
4. 0%
$
$ (5.00) $ (225,000)
$ (0.01) $ (5,000)
Repai r s & Mai nt enance
9,701,153
45,000 30.00%
A total dollar amount; Varies by extent of marketing effort
Sales Office 8%
$
$ (7.32) $ (2,561,069)
A total dollar amount; Varies by extent of marketing effort
11% Sales Events
( 16, 285)
24%
A percentage of the total project cost; varies by deal From 5% to 10% of Subtotal Costs; Varies by previous project experience
$ (0.06) $ (20,000)
( 23, 070)
( 56) $
Net O perating Income
$ (0.35) $ (121,956)
$ (0.07) $ (25,000)
( 79) $
( 45) $
F ixed E xpenes es
$ (1.23) $ (430,000) $ (6.97) $ (2,439,114)
5.0%
$ (0.03) $ (10,000)
( 63) $
( 2, 442, 726) $
$
A miscellaneous contingency for unforeseen expenses A monthly fee; Varies by deal
Collateral Media (Print, Web, Etc.)
( 3, 460, 529) $
$
An annual assessed tax per existing records
$ (0.01) $ (5,000) $ (0.63) $ (220,800)
A total dollar amount; Varies by extent of marketing effort
$
$
A Market rate per $1,000 of Total Hard Cost
A total dollar amount; Varies by extent of marketing effort
$
14,179,484
A Monthly amount per existing records
$ (0.03) $ (10,000)
6. 0%
$
$ -
PR
8. 5%
35%
$ (192,000) $ (0.17) $ (60,861) $ -
$ (0.06) $ (20,000)
Sal es & Mar ket i ng
G ros s O perating P rofit
A total dollar amount; Varies by site conditions A total dollar amount; Varies by project size/construction types employed
Marketing
Gener al & Admin
Subt ot al
$0 $4,600
Subtotal
Subt ot al
$5.75
A total dollar amount; Varies by project size
$ (0.03) $ (10,000) $ (0.03) $ (10,000) ($4,000)
Development Overhead
Department E xpens es
Tel ephone & Ot her
$ (15,000)
2%
Surveys & Investigations
Construction Testing & Inspections 100%
5%
Lender Fees/Reports/DD
1% Subtotal
A negotiated percentage fee of the total loan amount
$ (1.91) $ (668,506) 5.0%
$ (0.10) $ (33,425)
From 5% to 10% of Subtotal Costs; Varies by previous project experience
$ (2.01) $ (701,932)
Interest Reserve 14% Lender Inspection Fees
($500)
$ (0.05) $ (18,000)
A negotiated percentage fee of the total loan amount
Interest Carry
6.250%
$ (6.15) $ (2,151,536)
A market rate
100%
Total Project Costs
$ (6.20) $ (2,169,536)
$ (49.18) $ (17,212,289)
Rendering of Aerial View into Project and the BBP
Rendering of Interior of Hotel Rooms
Rendering of Big Opening
Rendering of Skybridge Pool
Rendering of Waterfront View
Project Circulation
SHANXI TATUNG SOLAR POWER EXPO RESTAURANT SHANXI TATUNG COMPETITION Shanxi
China
2012 Summer YB Design Studio Architectural Intern Restaurant Design Collaboration: Yan Mon, Wang Jing, Chen Jinyuan Principle: Steve Shih
Project Concept The main ideas of the competition 1. Design an underground architecture 2. Connect the project to the Park 3. Sustainability 4. Corresponding to the surrounding The design approach of the project is that designing of an earth-sheltered architecture, and integrated an observatory to create visual connection to the park. In terms of sustainability, the whole project uses green roof to process and storage the water; lastly, solar power to generate electricity.
Ground Floor Plan
Longitudinal Section
Cross Section
Rendering of View from the front
Rendering of Aerial View
Rendering of View from the back
Rendering of Sunken Plaza
RADIOLARIAN ARC 563 Computer Application 2012 Fall Using MAYA to compute an organic creature - Radiolarian Photoshop to post editing the rendering Instructor: Amber Bartosh
Conde’ Nast Building ARC 423 ADVANCED BUILDING SYSTEM 2011 Spring Analyze Building System Propose Improvements Based on Study Collaborated with Xiao Chen, Wei- Yi Tzeng, and Wanjing Xiao
Syracuse School of Architecture
Exercise 1: Building Analysis of Condé Nast 4 Times Square
Fall 2011
Bui Geographic location
June 21st
Humid Continental Climate (Warm Summer)
8am
72.7 Humid Continental Climate: A hot (or very warm) version of a continental climate features an average temperature of at least 22 °C (71.6 °F) in its warmest month. The warmest month is usually July, though in some cases, it can be in August. In this region, July afternoon temperatures average up to 32 °C (90 °F), while the January mean temperature can be far below −3 °C (26.6 °F).
Sum
June 21st 10am Winters are cold and damp,
June 21st
12pm
June 21st
4pm
June 21st
7pm
and prevailing wind patterns that blow offshore minimize the moderating effects of the Atlantic Ocean. Yet the Atlantic and the partial shielding of the Appalachians keep the city warmer in the winter than inland North American cities
25.8
11 Hours at least 25% of Four Times Square’s surface is under direct sunlight
Geographic Influence
o
o
6 Hours at least 60% of Four Times Square’s surface is under direct sunlight
" the urban heat island effect". It is caused by the large number of buildings, sidewalks and other surfaces that limit green growt such as grass and trees. Surfaces with green areas offer high moisture levels that cool the air when the moisture evaporates from soil and plants.
Dec. 21st
8am
June 21st
11pm
Wint
June 21st
12pm
June 21st
2pm
June 21st
4pm
8 Hours at least 25% of Four Times Square’s surface is under direct sunlight 3 Hours at least 50% of Four Times Square’s surface is under direct sunlight
Exercise Shadow 1: Building Analysis of Condé Nast 4 TimesBillboard Square studies / Skyline
Syracuse School of Architecture
Fall 2011
Exercise 1: Building Analysis of Condé Nast 4 Times Square
Building andI Site 20.October 2011 By Chen, Shih, Tseng,ARC Xiao 423_623
47th fl. - 52th fl.
Core: 21, 248 sq. ft. Rentable Space: 0 sq.ft. Total: 21,248
Fall 2011
52
Programming
Exercise 1: Building Analysis of Condé Nast 4 Times Square In Four Time Squares, the architect designs the core as the primary load bearing structure; therefore, concrete is being used. Yet, the frame structure that the architect designs have a clear idea that free up the interior space from bearing walls; as a result, this will generate more profit.
38th fl. - 46th fl.
Core: 5,713 sq.ft. Rentable Space: 24,000 sq.ft. Total: 24,831
Syracuse School of Architecture
Professor M Pelken
27. September 2011 I By Chen, Shih, Tseng, Xiao
Core
38
Steel Frame
27th fl. - 37th fl.
Core: 6,828 sq.ft. Rentable Space: 24,000 sq.ft. Total: 27,491
27 Conference
17th fl. - 26th fl.
Core: 6,828 sq.ft. Rentable Space: 24,000 sq.ft. Total: 30,494
17
9th fl. - 16th fl.
Core: 8,075 sq.ft. Rentable Space: 24,000 sq.ft. Total: 33,580
9 Ground Lobby
8th fl.
Core: 8075 sq.ft. Rentable Space: 24,000 sq.ft. Total: 39,000
Circulation Core
8
Lobby Core: first layer
Frame Structure: second layer
G
Office
20. October. 2011 I By Chen, Shih, Tseng, Xiao
Loading zone Service Footer should be placed here
Beams: primary
Beams: secondary
Retail
Ground fl. -7th fl.
Core: 8075 sq.ft. Lobby: 11,077 sq.ft. Rentable Space: 24000 sq.ft. Total: 44,395
Office space
Footer should be placed here
20. October. 2011 I By Chen, Shih, Tseng, Xiao
Structure System
Professor M Pelken
ARC 423_623
Buildin
Syracuse School of Architecture Building Analysis of Condé Nast 4 Times Square Syracuse School of Architecture Fall 2011 Exercise 1: Building Analysis Exercise of Condé1:Nast 4 Times Square Syracuse School of Architecture Fall 2011 Exercise 1: Building Analysis of Condé Nast 4 Times Square
Percentage and Quality of Openings
COOLING TOWER NATURAL GAS WATER
Cooling tower Water tank Fuel (Natural gas) Absorption
power converter from AC to DC
Chiller/Heater
HOT WATER CHILLED WATER
Photovolatic panel
Fall 201
Heating / Cooling
Found on the 37th to 43rd floor, south and east side of the facade. The PV panels are integrated in the spandrel, doubling as both cirtain wall and power generator. Supply up to 15kw of power
conduit housing in channel structure
46F pv cell
45F 44F 43F 42F 41F 40F 39F 38F 37F 36F
West 78% 20. October 20. October 2011 I By Chen, Shih, Tseng, Xiao 27. September 2011 I By Chen, Shih, Tseng, Xiao
South
59%
2011 I By Chen, Shih, Tseng, Xiao
East
52%
North
Electrical system Structural Systems
76% Mechanics System
ARC 423_623 ARC 423_623
Professor M Pelken Professor M Pelken
Professor M Pelken
ARC 423_6
Syracus
Exercise 2: Building Intervention of CondĂŠ Nast 4 Times Square Installation
Raised Ceiling Eliminating Air Duct
Modularized Floor Pattern
Unefficien
9� Raised Floor For Data System, Electricity and Air Duct
Building Intervention of Condé Nast Nast 4 Times Square rcise 1: Building Analysis of Condé 4 Times Square hool of Architecture Fall 2011Syracuse School of Architecture In the existing typical floor plan, the partition walls are constructed to reroute electricity circuit. To free up the tenant space, the concrete floor can be lifted up for 9 inches to allow electricity and air duct run under the floor. This also increases the floor height Air Filtration by eliminating the air duct in the drop ceiling, which brings more natural light into the office space.
Fall 2011
SyracuseSyracuse School ofSchool Architecture Fall 2011 Fall 2011 of Architecture
ly Rely on Mechanic System / Cooling
COMBINED HOUSE TANK DOMESTIC WATER STORAGE: 10, 500 GAL. TOTAL FIRE RESERVE: 10, 000 GAL. TOTAL
COMPARTMENT HOUSE TANK DOMESTIC WATER STORAGE: 8,000 GAL. TOTAL FIRE RESERVE: 10, 000 GAL. TOTAL
PRESSURE REDUCED ZONE LOCATED ON 39TH, 28TH, 25TH, 19, AND 12TH FLOOR TO REDUCE PIPE PRESSURE ACCUMULATED FROM MULTIPLE FLOORS.
Low Ceiling
Fixed Floor Lay Out
Unefficient Conventional System
Exhaust Pipe Hot Water Pipe Cold Water Pipe
EJECTOR DISCHARGE THE WASTE WATER INTO SEWER SYSTEM. AVERAGE FLOW: 0.18 CFS, PEAK FLOW: 0.76 CFS
SUCTION TANK STORAGE: 10,000 GAL. TOTAL BRING IN FRESH WATER FROM SERVICE MAIN
r Duct
1 I By Xiao Chen, Wei-yi CliffordXiao Shih, Wanjing Xiao, Abigail Hutchins ctober 2011 I By Chen,Tseng, Shih, Tseng, Professor
ystem
Sustainable Components
M Pelken
Mechanics System ARC 423_623
ntervention: Raise Floor
Professor M Pelken
Professor M Pelken
ARC 423_623
Overall Problems Mechanics System ARC 423_623
Professor M Pelken
ARC 423_623 ARC 423_623 Professor M Pelken
Exercise 2: Building Intervention of CondĂŠ Nast 4 Times Square
Syracuse School of Architecture
Fall 2011
Green Roof
Green Wall
Original Condition 06. December. 2011 I By Xiao Chen, Wei-yi Tseng, Clifford Shih, Wanjing Xiao, Abigail Hutchins
Proposed Condition
Comparison
Professor M Pelken
ARC 423_623
Exercise 2: Building Intervention of CondĂŠ Nast 4 Times Square
Syracuse School of Architecture
Fall 2011
Green Wall
Raised Floor
Original Condition 06. December. 2011 I By Xiao Chen, Wei-yi Tseng, Clifford Shih, Wanjing Xiao, Abigail Hutchins
Proposed Condition
Comparison
Professor M Pelken
ARC 423_623
SIMMONS HALL FACADE STUDY ARC 578 Facade as Idea 2012 Spring Instructor: Randle Korman AutoCAD 2D Drafting, Rhino 3D Model, Illustrator Diagram Simmons Hall at MIT Architects: Steven Holl Architects Location: Cambridge, Massachusetts
Structure Grid
Shadow Study
Line Drawing
Facade System
Figure Ground
Three Buildings
CLIFFORD SHIH
clifford1320@gmail.com
p:315-247-6508