British National Day by cmcpresentation

Diplomacy&Commerce

Photo: Tom Chambers

BRITISH National Day

THE FIRST TIME TO SAY THE 01 NOT GOODBYE TO BRUSSELS 02 BY SEA The UK will be the 4th territory leaving the EU, after Algeria (1962), Greenland (1985), Saint-Barthélémy (2012), but the first country ever to to do.

There is nowhere in Britain that is more than 74.5 miles from the sea.

Diplomacy&Commerce

03 BIG BELL

Big Ben does not refer to the clock, not the tower, but actually the bell. The tower is officially known as Elizabeth Tower.

04 DOWN UNDER

London is the first city in the world to have an underground subway system.

KINGDOM WHEN KNOW WHO 05 DISUNITED IT COMES TO FOOTBALL 06 YOU WE ARE, RIGHT? The UK has four independent national football teams (England, Scotland, Wales and Nothern Ireland), since the FA of the UK was never established.

The UK is the only country not required to name itself on its postage stamps.

COM MEN T

We Continue to Support

REFORMS IN SERBIA!

H.E. Denis Keefe

British Ambassador to Serbia

.E. Dennis Keefe, British Ambassador to Serbia, gave his opinion on the (un)surprising result of the vote on the UK’s membership in the European Union, which resulted in the so-called Brexit, thus triggering the bumpy process of withdrawal from the EU, the first case of its kind when it comes to full member countries. British PM David Cameron announced his resignation as of September, and now the race is on to find the new leader of the Conservative Party, with four candidates currently in the running. The top choice will take over the helm of the UK Government as of 9th September, thus kick-starting a new era in British history. According to Ambassador Keefe, “This was an important democratic decision of the British people in a referendum, and the British Prime Minister has presented his view on how the British Government should implement the aforementioned decision. The Prime Minister also made it clear that our goal is to work constructively with our friends and partners and to ensure we have a constructive relationship with them in the future”. Ambassador Keefe also added that: “Our policy in the Balkans is based, and always will be based, on the promotion of stability, prosperity and good neighbourly relations. We want to see the Balkan countries achieve success. We want to see Serbia achieve success and prosperity, and to that end we will continue to provide genuine support for genuine reform. We will continue to encourage Serbia along the right path, whether we are an EU member country or not”. The first session of the European Parliament has been held following the UK referendum which saw the majority decide to quit the EU. After the recent EU membership referendum, the implications for Serbia are still unknown. Some say that Brexit has not yet impacted on Serbia and its economy, nor that Serbia’s prospects of entering the EU will be affected much. Basically, all the financial panic lasted for just a day or so. Some say that the European Union will have to be concerned for quite a few years with the Brexit issues and forging

a new trade partnership with the United Kingdom, meaning that it will have no time for enlargement. Divergent currents regarding how the European Union should look, more or less united, are emerging, while on the other hand there are opinions that the “exit strategy” for the European Union might be to integrate the remaining Eastern European non-members as soon as possible, in order to recover self-dignity and enlarge the common market area. Reuters reports claims that difficulties will emerge sooner or later. “Our fear is that following Brexit the enlargement process could be slowed down,” said Maja Bobić, Secretary-General of the European Movement in Serbia, a group that promotes EU values. Bobić emphasised that while the EU negotiates on Britain’s exit, Brussels will be focused on how the bloc can be consolidated rather than enlarged. Difficulties for Serbia emerged as early as 4th July, when it failed to gain the support it needed from the UK to launch the next stage in accession negotiations. Serbian officials said that technical issues related to Brexit were the cause. The same applies for all other Balkan countries. Bosnian-Serb Prime Minister Željka Cvijanović told Reuters that “aspiring members must accept that joining the EU will be delayed by Brexit”, mainly “because it will take several years for the

estimate that the probability of this scenario would be increased if the process is delayed and the challenges increase uncertainty and risk. MAT emphasises that “when we discuss the consequences of the UK leaving the EU, we forget that we export hardly anything there. The value of total exports

Our policy in the Balkans is based, and always will be based, on the promotion of stability, prosperity and good neighbourly relations EU to consolidate and carry out the reforms it should have done years ago to prevent such things from happening”. According to other estimates, Serbia’s most important issue is whether this disorder will stop the restoration of economic activity in the EU and, indirectly, in Serbia too, with the acceleration of economic growth in Serbia having already been registered. This development can be considered pessimistic, but not impossible. According to analysis carried out by MAT, economic analysts

Diplomacy&Commerce

to the UK isn’t even a 20th of what is being exported to Bosnia-Herzegovina.” The United Kingdom is not our principal partner. The withdrawals of Italy, Austria or Germany would be really problematic, while Brexit is not. The UK will be now more orientated towards the Asia-Pacific region and the Americas, along with a growing African market, and therefore it could be our hub for trade with others, but we could effectively do that ourselves, since we are in good relations with Russia, the Eurasian Union and China.

Also, as B92 reports, Fiscal Council member Nikola Altiparmakov said immediately after the vote that “Britain leaving the EU will not force Serbia to implement additional austerity measures”. However, Altiparmakov did concede that Brexit could lead to a mild recession in the EU, which could in turn have a negative impact on Serbia's economic growth “in the grim scenario”. “What we have seen is a reaction in European markets that is also being felt in Serbia. It will not necessarily have a long-term impact but, in the grim scenario, it could cause a mild recession in the EU, which could have a negative impact on our economic growth,” Altiparmakov told N1 TV, noting that it is still too early to talk about this. “If it is not a serious recession, it will not require additional austerity measures. It would be sufficient to continue the measures agreed with the IMF, complete the reform of public enterprises and put in order the local self-government authorities, as well as everything else planned under the arrangement with the IMF for the next two years,” Altiparmakov said, according to our source at B92.

E CONOM Y

Consumer Spending the

MAIN DRIVER OF GROWTH

he UK ended 2015 as one of the fastest growing developed economies, with very low unemployment, robust housing market and consumers ready to spend. For at least the first half of 2016 it will be more of the same, mostly due to almost seven years of zero interest rates, rising living standards, low oil prices and government incentives to buy property. However, the overall pace of economic growth slowed in 2015, and in the first quarter of 2016 economy registered just 0.4% of GDP growth quarter on quarter. Economists predict BDP growth of 2% in 2016 and 2,2% in 2017. The current account deficit has reached 7% of GDP, the highest level on record, increasing vulnerabilities. According to the latest OECD prognosis, BDP growth is projected to be 1Âž per cent in 2016. Uncertainty about the outcome of the end-June 2016 referendum, which could lead to an exit of the United Kingdom from the European Union (Brexit), has undermined growth. This projection assumes that the United Kingdom remains in the European Union, in which case growth is projected to pick up in the second half of 2016 and then stabilise in 2017. According to PWC risks to growth are weighted to the downside in the short term due to international risks, particularly in relation to emerging markets, as well as uncertainties relating to the EU referendum. But there are also upside possibilities if the global environment improves and productivity growth rates accelerate in the UK. London continues to lead the recovery with projected growth of around 3% in 2016 but all other UK regions should also register positive real growth of

The UK recovery since mid-2009 has been relatively slow by historical standards, but faster than in most other G7 economies over this period. It is unclear whether current slowdown should be attributed to the Brexit vote or whether it is instead related to underlying weakness of the economy around 1.4-2.3% per annum this year. The economy increased by 7,3% compared to pre-downturn peak, which is 2,1% annual change. There are now concerns that the economic recovery may be losing momentum. Sector performance is mixed, with services growing robustly while manufacturing and construction are struggling. Services account for more than 75 per cent of GDP, and is one of the few parts of the economy to have surpassed its pre-recession peak. Service output in March grew for 2.6% on the annual basis. Manufacturing on the other hand is contributing about 10 percent of GDP today and is struggling to move back to its pre-crisis level. The number of people em-

ployed in the sector has declined even faster than its share of output but new technology has made the sector more productive as it focuses on higher value goods. However, annual change in industrial production output in April 2016 was 1.6%. Construction accounts for about 6 per cent of the economy, and hasnâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;t recovered from recession yet. It contracted by 17 per cent from peak to trough and remains below its pre-downturn peak. After a period of growth, mainly driven by housebuilding, the sector has begun falling again, but the data remains very volatile. Annual change in construction output in April was -3.7%. Before the financial crisis of 200809, productivity was growing steadily,

Manufacturing on the other hand is contributing about 10 percent of GDP today and is struggling to move back to its precrisis level

whether measured by output per worker, output per hour worked or the efficiency of both labour and capital used, but since the crisis productivity has been flat. The UK has one of the least productive workforces among the Group of Seven (G7), Ireland, Spain, Belgium, and the Netherlands. Of these countries, only Japan has lower economic output per hour worked. In 2014, output in the UK was 18% below the average for the rest of the G7. The UKâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s rapidly falling unemployment rate has been one of the major economic success stories of the past year. Initially led by part-timers and the self-employed, the growth has broadened to include full time employees, but the pace of improvement has slowed notably. At present the unemployment rate is 5.1% Bank lending to businesses is still weak. For example annual growth rate in lending to SMEs is -0.9% while annual growth rate in lending to all businesses is 0.3%. Although interest rates are at present very low with base rate of 0,5% in case of recovery of the economy, they will increas albeit gradually. Consumer spending has been one of the driving forces of the UK recovery. Low inflation, driven largely by falling oil prices, tough competition between supermarkets and the strength of sterling keeping down the costs of imports, were adding to strength of household finances. April retail sales, grew by 4,3% on annual basis. However, there are some concerns that the source of consumer spending are either savings or loans, which might cause problems in future. Real wages, which dropped about 8 per cent since the financial crisis began, are recovering but slowly.

www.diplomacyandcommerce.rs

COR POR AT E

COOPERATION OF P LONDON AND THE TOMISLAV ŠUNJKA Monty Raphael QC

Peters & Peters London

Monty Raphael QC is the author of Bribery Law and Practice published by the OUP, March 2016. He is Special Counsel at Peters & Peters and is happy to acknowledge that this article was read by two colleagues in the Business Crime Team, Maria Cronin and Nick Querée.

Those Doing Business in or With the U.K. Need to be Aware The most controversial section of the 2010 Bribery Act (the Bribery Act) is that which makes it a crime for companies to have benefited from bribery, which the state believes was preventable

ince July 1st 2011, there have been new laws in place which can see businesses investigated (with collateral reputational damage), prosecuted, fined, debarred, made subject to civil recovery orders, or the subject of deferred prosecution agreements, if they bribe their way to profit anywhere in the world. There are both certainties and uncertainties for both business and compliance professionals. One notable certainty is that the U.K. has robust, if not always efficient, anti-money laundering laws and regulations, with more than 350,000 suspicious activity reports being made each year. Companies in the so-called "regulated sector" face prosecution for failing to report suspicion or knowledge of money laundering. This is one way in which intelligence reaches agencies like the Serious Fraud Office who are the lead anti-corruption prosecutors. Other intelligence arises from whistleblowing, due diligence in the M&A process and of course discovery by overseas agencies. The moment the mere fact of an investigation reaches the public domain there is lasting reputational damage even if the outcome is favourable for the company. As Tomislav Sunjka wrote in the March issue, the key note of any compli-

ance programme must be the preservation of corporate integrity. The Bribery Act punishes both public and private bribery, the giver as well as the receiver.

sive as to be self-evidently a bribe, it is unlikely to attract the attention of the Serious Fraud Office. There is no obligation to prosecute, even where evidence exists, unless it is in the public interest so to do. The prosecuting authorities have issued guidance which, while promising no certainty of outcomes, encourages self-reporting by companies and total cooperation in investigation if they are to have a chance of avoiding prosecution. Instead, they might hope to be offered a Deferred Prosecution Agreement with a financial payment, or a non-penal solution like a Civil Recovery Order. Of course, individuals who have transgressed remain at risk of prosecution, DPAs are not available to them. The uncertainties arise because it can be

Since 2011 we at Peters & Peters have been called upon to advise SMEs as well as multinationals on the adequacy of their controls and to devise new codes of practice In compliance with the OECD Convention, the Bribery Act specifically criminalises the bribery of a foreign public official. The immediate effect of this radical legislation was to persuade businesses to introduce and implement bespoke compliance programmes. Since 2011 we at Peters & Peters have been called upon to advise SMEs as well as multinationals on the adequacy of their controls and to devise new codes of practice. Back in 2011, U.K. boardrooms were fearful that there would be a tsunami of prosecutions and sanctions on business, which would make U.K. companies globally uncompetitive. This has not been the case. For example, provided corporate hospitality is kept within reasonable bounds and is not so exces-

Diplomacy&Commerce

months or years after the discovery of bribery that the company learns of the outcome preferred by the agency and, in the case of a DPA, any arrangement

is subject to judicial scrutiny. One of the problems facing those advising businesses in those circumstances is how to proceed. Should there be an internal investigation, possibly in collaboration with the prosecuting agency. Should senior executives be sacrificed or supported, and when this decision should be made. Lastly what should be done when faced with investigations in more than one jurisdiction, all with different laws and different policies. Some of these uncertainties could have been removed by now, had there been a significant number of cases in the last five years, but this has not been the case. At the time of writing, while there are a number of companies awaiting the discovery of their fate with at least one awaiting trial, there has so far only been one prosecution, met with a plea of guilty, one Deferred Prosecution Agreement sanctioned by the court and one Civil Recovery Order. There have of course been other cases dealing with delinquent conduct under the pre Bribery Act law. Companies doing business in or with the U.K. will need to seek immediate legal assistance when bribery is suspected, let alone discovered, in the hope that those advising them can at least give them some idea of the possibilities or even probabilities, if not the certainties.

The burden then shifts to the company to demonstrate that the bribery occurred notwithstanding that there were adequate procedures in place. What procedures are to be considered adequate? The U.K. Government has published guidance of a generic nature setting out six principles, which any guidance programme needs to possess if it is to have a chance of being regarded as adequate: • The procedures must be proportionate; • The company must demonstrate a top down commitment to preventing bribery; • The business must make a realistic assessment of risk; •D ue diligence enquiries must be searching; • The compliance programme must be communicated throughout the business and training must be of a sufficiently high quality and repeated at appropriate intervals; and • Any compliance programme must be subject to constant monitoring and review.

PETERS & PETERS E LAW OFFICE OF – U.K. BRIBERY ACT Tomislav Šunjka

Law office of Tomislav Šunjka

Tomislav Šunjka is a regional representative of Anti-Corruption Committee of the International Bar Association (IBA) and country member of ICC FraudNet asset recovery network.

U.K. Bribery Act – Does it Apply to Serbia, Serbian Public Officials and Businessmen at All? In own defense and to prevent the bribery, commercial organization is obliged to place adequate procedures designed to prevent persons associated with them from undertaking such conduct and bribes

rom July 1st, 2011 the answer is YES. I would like to explain the public function or activities to which bribe relates. The bribe relates to any function of a public matter, any activity connected with a business, trade and professions, any activity performed in course of a person`s employment and any activity performed by or on behalf of a body of persons, corporate or unincorporated. A person – public official or another by his request is guilty for bribe if requests or accepts a financial or other advantage intending that, in consequence, perform a relevant function or activity improperly. It is important to say that function or activity is relevant even if it has no connection with the U.K., and is performed outside the U.K. Who are foreign public officials? “Foreign public official” is an individual who holds a legislative, administrative or judicial position of any kind, whether appointed or elected, of a country or territory outside the U.K., exercises public function, for or on behalf of a country or territory outside the U.K., or for any public agency or public enterprise of that country or territory, or is an official or agent of a public international organization. Hence Serbian appointed or elected individuals, too? Does business people and commercial organizations have obligation to prevent bribery? Absolutely!

Commercial organization is guilty for bribe if its legal representative and responsible person fails to prevent bribery and/or bribes another person intending to obtain or retain business for commercial organization, or to obtain and/or retain an advantage in the conduct of business. In own defense and to prevent the bribery, commercial organization is obliged to place adequate procedures designed to prevent persons associated with them from undertaking such conduct and bribes.

through assessment of risks, due diligence, integrity check and compliance programs. U.K. companies from regulated sectors (financials services, pharmaceutical sector, energy sector and others) were especially interested. Particular difficulties occur in cases where there are more than two jurisdictions. Due to a favorable Agreement on avoidance of double taxation between Serbia and the Netherlands, the majority of investors, commercial organizations and companies from U.K. operating in Serbia,

Since 2011 Law Office of Tomislav Šunjka is engaged to advise companies who planed and performed business from UK to Balkan market on the adopting adequate policy and procedure As Mr. Raphael Monty QC said, those companies – commercial organizations commits criminal act if they have benefit from bribery. Companies have burden of proof to demonstrate that they have adequate policy and procedures. Since 2011 Law Office of Tomislav Šunjka is engaged to advise companies who planed and performed business from U.K. to Serbian and Balkan market on the adopting adequate policy and procedure, internal investigation and procedure as a consequence of this as a criminal procedure, damage procedure, employment issues and etc. We did it

form a holding company in the Netherlands, which then operates in Serbia. This type of complex organizational structure requires a more complex legal support. This type of structure is also used by the institutional investors as well as investors that have the status of an international organization such as EBRD and other. Usage of this type of structure is legal and legitimate, yet, I have to point out that U.K. Bribery Act also has effect towards structures which use more than one jurisdiction for doing business. Hence, prevention and adequate policy and procedure are absolutely necessary

for doing integrity business in each level of this kind of structure. Serbia does not have such a relevant Law or Act. Criminal offence of bribery is regulated in Serbian Criminal Code ("Official Gazette of RS", No. 85/2005, … 108/2014). Criminal responsibility of companies as legal entities is regulated by a special law – Commercial offences act ("Official Gazette of the SFRY", Nos. 4/77 … 3/90, "Official Gazette of the FRY", Nos. 27/92…64/2001 and "Official Gazette of RS", No. 101/2005 - other law). In my opinion, in this phase of development of legal system in Serbia and its harmonization with internationally recognized legal standards and standards of EU, it is very important to adopt a special, elaborated law, which would define the offences of bribery and which are the functions or activities to which bribery relates. When looking at entire criminal legislative in Serbia, it is needed to say that appropriate legal institutes and instruments appear in several sources and laws, yet their usage is not primary. Primary responsibility of an individual is still widespread, while victims are usually referred to civil procedure, which can last for years after the criminal procedure. Criminal liability of companies occurs in very few cases in practice and there is no publicly available records and practice of such cases. Also, there is no official statistics of such cases. This can have two meanings: that the statistics or cases register does not exist, or that there are no cases of foreign investment/investment bribes, or that said cases exist, however they are not processed for different reasons. It is desirable to establish a case database similar to one of the World Bank, where the cases of corruption, explanations and way of completion of the case, sanctions, enforcement, fines and other, would be presented to public. This would reduce the arbitrariness and establish binding jurisprudence which would have its origin in the new law / act.

www.diplomacyandcommerce.rs

ECONOMIC CO OP E RAT ION

Growing Interest Among British

COMPANIES IN SERBIA

Although the volume of trade and British investments in Serbia have been relatively moderate, Serbia’s political and economic stability has contributed to growing interest in cooperating and investing among British companies. Both the 2015 and early 2016 trends testify to this

he UK and Serbia have traditionally good bilateral relations, altough economic cooperation between the two countries has been relatively moderate. However, mutual trade and new investments by British investors have been on the up. Budding political and economic relations are partly due to Serbia becoming an EU candidate, which resulted in British companies expressing greater interest in the Serbian market. There is growing interest among investment funds to invest in Serbia, as well as interest in cooperating with Serbia among business associations from various British counties. In 2015, trade between the two countries reached its peak, as did exports. The deficit was at its lowest ever and the export to import ratio was the highest in the last 15 years. Total trade amounted to €377.1 million, with a Serbian deficit of €22.5 million and an export-import ratio of 88.7%. Total trade grew by 26.6% compared to 2014. Serbian exports to the UK were up by 53.2%, marking a 9.7% rise relative to 2014. In 2013, for the first time ever, the value of trade between the two countries exceeded €300 million. In 2014, the value was €2 million less than in 2013, while in 2015 it was the highest ever. In the first four months of 2016, the total value of trade stood at €127 million, with Serbia’s exports worth €71.5 million and imports €55.5 million. The €16-million surplus in favour of Serbia is a novelty in trade between the two countries. In terms of the structure of goods exported to the UK in 2016, Serbia mostly exported products classified on the basis of their material (€62.3 million), machines and transport devices (€42.3 million), food and live animals (€27 million) and miscellanous finished products

(€24.3 million). In 2015, Serbia mostly imported from the UK machines and transport devices (€63.8 million), chemical and related products (€45.4 million), finished products classified on the basis of their material (€29.8 million) and products / transactions not mentioned in the SITC (€27.3 million). The biggest export growth, recorded in 2015, was attributed to chemical products (526.3%), inedible crude materials except fuels (370.5%), food and live animals (104.1%), machines and transport devices (98.7%) and miscellanous finished products (74.3%). In terms of imports in 2015, almost all categories recorded growth as following – products and transactions not mentioned in the SITC (53.5%), animal and vegetable oils, fats and waxes (38.4%) and finished products classified on the basis of their material (34.7%).

bia in 2014 and €15.7 million in 2015. British investments in Serbia mostly involve institutional investors (investment funds), which were also active during the privatisation period from 2001 to 2005. At a later stage, these funds sold the companies they bought here. For instance, Midland Resources Holding Ltd sold the Stari Grad Hospitality Company and the Port of Pančevo, while Ashmore Fund sold Carnex. Many of the investment funds founded with British capital that are still active in Serbia are registered in Switzerland, Cyprus and The Netherlands (tax havens), so the real value of British investments to date definitely exceeds the value stated by the NBS (in 75% of cases it has been British funds and banks that have bought securities at auctions). British investors are present in var-

In 2015, trade between the two countries reached its peak, as did exports. The deficit was at its lowest ever and the export-import ratio was the highest for the last 15 years According to data collated by the National Bank of Serbia (using the old methodology), total British net direct cash investments in Serbia in the period from 2005 to 2013 amounted to €289.9 million. This makes the UK the 14th biggest investor in Serbia. In 2014, NBS data collated using the new methodology showed that the UK invested €57.3 million worth of net investments in Ser-

Diplomacy&Commerce

ious sectors – from the tobacco industry, telecommunications and real estate, to financial mediation and the automobile industry. One of the biggest British investments in Serbia is British-American Tobacco (BAT), which acquired the Vranje Tobacco Company in 2003, making BAT one of the most important foreign investors in Serbia and the single biggest Brit-

ish investor in the country. To date, BAT has invested over €200 million in Serbia, of which €115 million was spent on buying and modernising the tobacco factory in Vranje, which now produces some of the company's leading global brands. Corporation Agena Technology was founded by British company Albon Engineering & Manufacturing Plc. in Šimanovci in 2005. Albon produces car parts and machines for the production of car parts. Serbia is the third country in the world, after the U.S. and the UK, where the company has opened production facilities. The factory in Šimanovci, spanning 7,000 square metres, produces machines for connecting rods and crankshafts for diesel engines used in Volvo, Renault, Iveco and Caterpillar lorries, as well as inboard engines. Everything produced here is exported to the U.S. and the UK. British companies recognise Serbia as an investment destination for real estate, infrastructure, car parts’ production, telecommunications and the pharmaceutical industry. They are also interested in investing in the service sector, namely legal services, financial services, public-private partnerships, public relations, engineering, waste management and energy efficiency. According to British companies, the sectors best suited for cooperation are energy, environmental protection, the automobile industry (car parts), agriculture, IT, spas, the textile industry, mining and infrastructure. Up to 2013, British companies spent €79.43 million on different assistance programmes in Serbia, including public administration reform, macroeconomic and fiscal policies & security, safety, judicial matters and others. As part of a coordinated EU effort, the British government provided assistance to Serbia during the catastrophic floods of 2014

I N TERV I EW

Friendship Leads

TO BUSINESS OPPORTUNITIES James Alistair Gunn

Vice-Chair, British Society of Serbia

ames Gunn one of the founders of The British Society of Serbia in this interview speaks about how the Society contributes to building friendships, charitable activities and business opportunities between two countries.

Those with experience working with you described you as: "In an industry overrun by people executing standard communications strategies with few results, I found working with James to be a welcome breath of fresh air". Do you think that many professionals today are overpromising and underachieving? — No more or no less than anywhere else. After living and working in Cape Town, Bangkok, Madrid, New York, Brussels and now Belgrade for global brands and leading public affairs consultancies, I can say there are two groups of professionals: those ready to cut corners and those ready to excel. Overpromising and underachieving are in reality questions of integrity, both personal and professional. We have wonderful professionals in Serbia who would put many to shame in London or NYC. But that is just one part of the equation. Due to a number of limiting factors – such as small budgets, lack of experience and so on – businesses often compromise between hiring a professional and a cheaper option. This can encourage all sorts of less-than-professional behaviour which diminishes the chance of things being done properly. But that is the way it is and there’s no point lamenting it. The important thing is to say things how they are, expect high standards and maintain a sense of humour. A professional is not a mere executive, they aim to change the game, provide pragmatic counsel, defend their clients’ interests vigorously and in a true sense of partnership.

The British Society of Serbia is a voluntary, not-for-profit association of expatriates, diplomats, and cultural and educational professionals with links to the United Kingdom. How can the Society help strengthen political, cultural and business ties with the UK?

The British Society of Serbia Society is not simply an organisation representing foreign residents in Serbia, living in the “bubble” with little interaction with their Serbian hosts. On the contrary, it backs its 1,500 members from the UK, Commonwealth and Serbia by providing advice and practical support and build friendships with Serbian hosts

— We do a lot. I funded the establishment of the Society as such organisations crucially bridge a gap that developed since the 1990s. Our 1,500 members from the UK, Commonwealth and Serbia support each other in providing advice and practical support. We fundraise for charity including the Red Cross and Blazing to Serbia, help members find employment and develop business opportunities. We educate new arrivals in Serbia about how to settle into life here and learn about their new home. Most importantly, we build friendships with our Serbian hosts, many of whom have studied and worked in the UK. From friendship comes business. We also serve as a first point of contact when business leaders investigate new locations to expand their operations. In this capacity we have played a pivotal role in helping certain investors decide to move to Serbia as well as in providing export advice to Serbian entrepreneurs. It is very reassuring to see Brits and Serbs share the same mission.

We are particularly interested in the Society’s involvement in projects in Serbia. What have you done so far and what are your concrete plans? — Serbia and the UK have a long history together. At this time, for example, we remember the Great War and the British nurses and doctors that came to help Serbia, and refugees hosted in Scotland one hundred years ago. We are highlighting such moments and use them as a corner-

businesses and their services to members of the foreign community in Serbia, provide free-of-charge advice to young Serb talent interested in continuing their education in Britain or exploring internships in UK companies. The past few months saw British citizens

The Society serves as a first point of contact when business leaders investigate new locations to expand their operations, and it has played a pivotal role in helping certain investors decide to move to Serbia stone to strengthen the British-Serbian relationship in this century. Dr Elisabeth Ross, Scotland’s first female physician is buried in Kragujevac. Therefore, our events are used to fundraise for the Red Cross in Sumadija in memory of the medics that served there. We also work to introduce Serbian

seeks advice on how to vote in the Brexit Referendum. We have been operating for a year and so our intention is to increase these activities, hold more regular fundraising and networking events, promote Britain in Serbia, and provide a hub to support the activities of likeminded organisations.

How much could the foreign experience that is brought by the British Society of Serbia contribute to positive change in the overall business and cultural climate in Serbia, and to the improvement of people’s attitudes towards Western and British values? — The Society is not simply an organisation representing foreign residents in Serbia, some of whom live in an expat “bubble” with little interaction with their Serbian hosts. We have many Serbian members who have held responsible positions in the UK and are bringing their experience of British business and culture back to Serbia. So, I would suggest that these are our biggest ambassadors. It is a two way street as we have much to learn from each other. We will monitor with interest the UK’s plans to exit the European Union and the partnership it will offer to accession countries like Serbia. Both Britons living in Serbia and Serbs with UK connections will be seeking much reassurance in the months and years ahead.

www.diplomacyandcommerce.rs

COR POR AT E

Only Healthy

POPULATION CAN BE PRODUCTIVE Marija Krstić

GlaxoSmithKline (GSK)

icines and vaccines at its core, we are quite aware of how much we are contributing to improving health and quality of life of millions of people worldwide, including Serbian citizens. The value of innovative medicines is primarily reflected in their substantial contribution to longer life expectancy and mortality reduction. According to the data collated by the OECD from 30 of its member countries, innovative medication contributed to 73% of the actual increase in life expectancy at birth while the remaining 27% is attributed to education, reducing risk factors, availability of healthcare and other. There is no substitute for long-term health outcome, and this outcome is based on innovative pharmaceutical products and their availability to patients. Thus it is our priority in Serbia to make innovative therapy available to everyone who needs it regardless of where they live or their ability to pay or

laxoSmithKline’s priority is to transfer the results of our global, 150-year-old scientific heritage to Serbia which has greatly contributed to improving health, life and future of millions of people worldwide – says Marija Krstić, the newly appointed General Manager of GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) Serbia and Montenegro.

We have read recently that, in terms of use of innovative medication, Serbia is seriously lagging behind other European countries. What can be done to rectify this situation considering the very limited budget of the Serbian healthcare system? — We should bear in mind that good health is a basic human right. Furthermore, health significantly affects economic and business development – only

We have been investing a lot of effort into providing Serbian citizens with access to the cuttingedge therapy in order for them to have the same healthcare standards as people in the EU or U.S.. However, we can succeed in this only if we partner with all healthcare stakeholders

According to the data collated by the OECD, innovative medication significantly contributes to the actual increase in life expectancy which is why we have been trying to make them available to every Serbian citizen in need a healthy population can be a productive population. Hence, it is understandable why healthcare is mentioned in at least four goals of the 2020 European Development Agenda and why it is one of the key chapters in Serbia’s accession negotiations with the EU. As an innovative, global pharmaceutical company, which has investments in research and development of new med-

Diplomacy&Commerce

ability to pay for it. In the last five years, marketing authorization was granted for over 20 new medications, vaccines and consumer healthcare products in Serbia. In the following period, we expect to provide patients in Serbia with access to additional innovative therapies, namely in respiratory, immunization and HIV area, where we are market leaders. However, we are aware that we op-

erate in an environment where healthcare budgets are exposed to great pressure. This is true not only of Serbia, but also of entire Europe. Short-term and irrational healthcare cuts cause only negative outcome for the population’s health and sustainability of the healthcare system which, in turn, is closely related to the country’s reforms and economic development. According to the results of the latest survey about Serbia’s healthcare system, conducted by the analytical team from the London-based magazine The Economist, our country is at the very bottom in Europe in terms of availability of therapies despite Serbia having the biggest healthcare spending per capita in the region. Patients are facing delay in access to innovative medicines. To corroborate this, let me just say that very few medicines, with limited access for patients, entered the Reimbursement List while, for instance, Bulgaria broadened its national list with more than 40 and Croatia with over 25. Under such circumstances, I think that the Government's decisions need to be based on the value they bring to healthcare users. Investments in prevention and adequate innovative therapies should be at the core of the strategies for healthcare institutions. However, what I am happy about is the government’s resolution to bring Serbia closer to the EU which will positively reflect on healthcare too in terms of the European regulation and faster, improved procedures that will give patients a direct access to innovative medicines, will improve clinical outcome and will give the citizens of Serbia an equal opportunity to have access to optimal treatment. I salute any government initiative in the previous period and hope that the

ongoing healthcare reforms would continue with the new government, including the implementation of the recently adopted healthcare laws.

Which areas does GlaxoSmithKline cover with its medication and therapies which are essential for improving the quality of life of patients in Serbia? — GSK has a very diverse portfolio in Serbia where we have been operating for over two decades. A long tradition in successfully treating respiratory diseases and improving the patients’ quality of life makes us a recognisable leader in this area. We are very eager to see the launch of the new medicine for respiratory diseases and we do hope that patients in Serbia will be able to experience the benefits of this therapy considering the burden of respiratory diseases in our country. Immunisation is also an area in which we are global leaders. As one of the world leading vaccine manufacturers, GSK produces 30 different vaccines that are a part of the immunisation protocols in 182 countries. We have recognised the state’s interest in long-term investing in prevention and the health of its population. The steps that the state has made in the last few months in making the latest vaccines available to children in Serbia seem encouraging. I am confident that pharmaceutical industry can cooperate with the state authorities in devising business models that would boost the efficiency of the healthcare here. In the HIV area, GSK and its partners have joined their expertise and resources to launch ViiV Healthcare, a global

company specialised in treating HIV with the goal of advancing the treatment and care people living with HIV. The result of this is the latest therapies that have demonstrated their superiority in treating the disease which has lead to an exceptionally important improvement in the quality of life of the

people with HIV. Concurrently, we have been implementing the Positive Action programme which assists the HIV patients through supporting numerous programmes and initiatives in their local communities. Apart from the aforementioned, GSK’s portfolio in Serbia also comprises of medications that are used in treatment of systemic infections, osteoporosis, rare diseases, and the diseases of the nervous and genitourinary system. We also produce medications for which patients don’t need prescription, oral hygiene products, cosmetics and dietary supplements. Some of our brands, like Panadol, Coldrex, Sensodyne, Paradontax, Aquafresh and a few others, are leading brands in Serbia. Thanks to our cultural heritage and our commitment to research many of our products have completely transformed the approach to treatment and have improved medical practices. Our success depends on our ability to research and develop innovative medicines and vaccines in order to help change lives and the future of millions of people worldwide. Over 13,000 scientists are working on accomplishing this goal while using the most advanced

finding new ways to make them available to anyone who needs them.

Considering that you have been appointed GM of GSK Serbia only recently, could you tell us what are you going to focus on in the Serbian market? — Our priority in Serbia is to transfer the results of our global, 150-year-old scien-

GSK adapts its pricing policy to the local market and our aim is to improve the cooperation with the state institutions and the network of healthcare institutions through an ethical and transparent approach

scientific resources in order to discover and develop new treatments. This is a complex process which lasts between 12 and 15 years and requires investments of over £500 million in single medicine alone. Thus we continue working on developing the medicines of the future and

tific heritage here because it has greatly contributed to advancing health, life and future of millions of people. This means investing a lot of effort into making innovative medicines available to everybody. By doing so, our citizens would have access to the latest therapies and would be able to have the same standards of healthcare as people in the EU or US. Still, we are aware of the fact that we cannot travel this road alone. All healthcare stakeholders need to focus on patient needs, and we can achieve best results only if we act in partnership. From the standpoint of a company which has been operating in Serbia for over 20 years, I think that, despite of the instability of this market, Serbia has sufficient capability, expertise and investment opportunities. In accordance with that, GSK has adapted its pricing policy to the local market and our aim is to improve the cooperation with the state and the network of healthcare institutions through an values and transparent approach. Owing to our experience from over 100 countries that we operate in, GSK has the capacity to devise long-term, sustainable solutions which would balance

out financial investments and clinical outcomes in the partnership with the state. The essence of the healthcare, which is entirely focused on patients, is to have a system that, in practice, functions in a way to completely meets patient’s needs. In the coming period, we will continue to improve our business based on our

values, transparency and integrity in relation to our customers. In Serbia, as elsewhere in the world, we are working hard to transform GSK in a more competitive and efficient company, changing and adapting our business model to better meet society's expectations.

What CSR activities does GSK carry out in Serbia? — Among the reasons why I am proud to lead GSK in Serbia and Montenegro is a significant value that this company brings to the society. I am so glad to have the opportunity to see many changes and the progress in the company whether we are talking about efforts to improve the availability of our medicines and vaccines, or continuous investing in local community through CSR projects, or the evolution of our operational model into a structure that is better integrated in local environment. Our comprehensive approach to corporate social responsibility is based on four strategic pillars – health for all, ethical business, our people and our planet. It is in CSR that GSK has become recongisable in Serbia. In the last few years, our company was the recipient of 10 prestigious awards for philanthropy. Last year alone, GSK received three awards – the Trag Foundation’s Virtus Award for long-term partnershp between business and non-profit sector, the Gold Plaque from the UEPS for the best charity event in the COPD awareness campaign and the award from the Responsible Business Forum for the innovative approach to volunteering, commitment and good influence in pro bono support.

www.diplomacyandcommerce.rs

TOU R I SM

Marriage of Tradition and

MODERNITY

Text: Žikica Milošević

There are not many places in the world where a period drama can be shot so convincingly as in the UK. And there is no place in the UK that is a long way from the sea. Lots of them are strikingly green. There are so many castles and… Oh, stop! You convinced me. I want to go to the UK as a tourist!

The Royal Pavilion Brighton

here are many spots in the United Kingdom that connect us to the world of literature, the world of film and the world of music. Indeed, the Brits are masters of the Universe when it comes to popular culture and they have managed to “sell their story” so convincingly that, if you think carefully, probably the majority of the scenes you’ve memorised were actually shot in the UK. “The Highlander” took us to rocky Scotland, “Trainspotting” took us to underground Edinburgh, Oasis took us to Manchester and The Beatles to Liverpool. The lavish country houses are well known from the film adaptations of Jane Austen’s books, Hugh Grant funnily climbed up the hill and got back from the mountain in Wales, Dr Who took us to some distant shores of “slate grey Victorian sky”, as well as Morrissey (who actually coined the expression). London is the world’s capital of music, street fashion, and urban style, where we walk in the shadows of David Bowie, Sherlock Holmes or Dorian Grey. We all want to see the United Kingdom, right? Well, every corner has its thrills, starting from foggy London, where “English summer rain seems to last for ages”,

as Brian Molko famously said, but we crave it. Maybe the rain endures and sometimes the sky is grey, but that is why the grass grows so lavishly bright green, and the detective cases of Hercule Poirot took us to some of the greenest pastures and curvy Celtic roads of Central and Southern England. If you like pop music, then you want to see Manchester or Brixton. If you like the flourishing art scene, then you want to go to

Bibury Cottages in the Cotswolds

Diplomacy&Commerce

Giant's Causeway

Durham Millburngate Bridge

the original grass surfaces. Maybe you are more pastoral and want to go to some countryside areas? No problem! The Cotswolds looks like a place frozen in time, with stone houses made from local Cotswolds stone. The nearby Stonehenge takes us to the world of ancient men and modern druids, while the mud and boots of Glastonbury connect this area to the modernity by way of the world’s most famous music festival. And, of course, who hasn’t heard of Oxbridge? Oxford and Cambridge might not be the two universities in the world with the best capacities or ratings, but they certainly make you dream about visiting them. Those who like pure nature flock to Snowdonia or the Lake District, or

This is a country we all know so much about, and that is why it is a country that receives 36.115 million visits a year (in 2015), generating some 22.072 billion U.S. dollars Bristol. The temple of tennis is, of course, in Wimbledon, where the only of four world Grand Slams is still played on

Northern and Western Scotland, where the mountains, lakes and seashore mix with colourful houses. And Scotland is also home to the world’s most famous monster: the charming “Nessie” from Loch Ness. The Giant’s Causeway in Northern Ireland will transport you to the world of Celtic legends. The story goes that Irish giant Fionn mac Cumhaill (Finn MacCool) was challenged to a fight by Scottish giant Benandonner and built the causeway across the North Channel so that the two giants could meet. Only the Elves are missing. This is a country we all know so much about, and that is why it is a country that receives 36.115 million visits a year (in 2015), generating some 22.072 billion U.S. dollars. I guess we would all like to be among that 36+ million.

JU N E 20 1 6

THE QUEEN’S BIRTHDAY in Belgrade

he British Embassy in Belgrade yesterday celebrated the 90th birthday of Queen Elizabeth II. The hosts of celebrations of the Queen’s official birthday in Belgrade were His Excellency the British Ambassador to Serbia Denis Keefe and his wife Kate. This year’s Queen’s Birthday celebration was dedicated to the celebration of 400 years since the death of writer William Shakespeare. At this year’s celebration of the Queen’s official birthday of the national anthem of Great Britain and the Republic of Serbia were sung by the “Stanislav Binički” Choir of the Ministry of Defence and the Army of Serbia. Numerous guests from the public, cultural and political life of Serbia tasted the finest wines and beers and spirits. Otherwise, Her Royal Majesty Queen Elizabeth II for 90 years has been celebrating her birthday on 21st of April. However, the central celebration of the Queen’s official birthday is traditionally organised in the first, second, or sometimes third Saturday in June. H.E. Denis Keefe with his spouse

H E French Ambassador Christine Moro with her husband

H.E. Giuseppe Manzo, Italian Ambassador to Serbia and Maja Gojković, President of the Assembly

Marija Desivojević (Delta Holding), Miroslav Mišković (Delta Holding), Nikola Papak (Delhaize) and Veljko Lalić ("Nedeljnik")

Ambassador Keefe in conversation with Nebojša Stefanović, Serbian Minister of Interior Affairs

Chief of General Staff of the Serbian Army, Ljubiša Diković and Zoran Đorđević, Defence Minister