COLLEGIATETIMES
May 27, 2010
what’s inside News .............2 Opinions........4 Features ........7 Sports ...........9 Classifieds ...10 Sudoku ........10 107th year issue 61 blacksburg, va.
13-year-old student Report says Tech did not brings guns, ammo to school Tuesday provide ‘timely warning’ ZACH CRIZER news reporter
DANIEL LIN/SPPS
Blacksburg police stood guard outside BMS Tuesday afternoon. LIANA BAYNE news editor Blacksburg High School classes at Blacksburg Middle School were canceled on Tuesday night after a middle school student brought a gun to school. Brenda Blackburn, Montgomery County schools superintendent, said that school officials were alerted that there was “potentially a weapon” inside BMS Tuesday afternoon. Police apprehended a 13-yearold BMS student at 12:26 p.m. and took two hand guns and ammunition from the student. That student has been charged with two counts of possession of
weapons on school property and two counts of possession of firearms by a minor. The student is currently being held in the New River Valley Juvenile Detention Home. High school classes are normally scheduled to begin at 2 p.m., after middle school classes end at 1:30 p.m. Middle school classes ended normally and middle schoolers were sent home on buses. At the time of the incident, middle school students had just left school and high school students were arriving before their classes started. They were told to return home as soon as they arrived. see GUN SCARE / page three
Virginia Tech’s actions during the April 16, 2007, campus shootings have been deemed violations of federal regulations by the Department of Education, solidifying a stricter interpretation of “timely warning” requirements. “First, the warnings that were issued by the university were not prepared or disseminated in a manner to give clear and timely notice of the threat to the health and safety of campus community members,” the report said. “Secondly, Virginia Tech did not follow its own policy for the issuance of timely warnings as published in its annual campus security reports.” Student Seung-Hui Cho killed 32 Tech students and faculty in the shootings. His first two victims were killed in West Ambler-Johnston Hall before he left campus and returned to kill 30 more and injure 17 in Norris Hall before committing suicide. In January, after a 27-month investigation, the Department of Education issued its initial findings on Tech’s compliance with federal timely warning regulations. Tech responded on April 20, and posted the report and response on its Web site on May 18. The review process allows the Department of Education to consider the university’s response and then issue a final report. The initial investigation was notably lengthy, and many expect the final report to be completed in six to eight months. If the violations remain in the final
Department of Education Preliminary Findings: Timeliness violation — “As documented in the Review Panel Report and confirmed by our own examination, Virginia Tech officials had information available to them that required a timely warning to the university community much earlier than 9:26 a.m. For this reason, the Department has concluded that the timely warning requirement was not met.” Policy violation — “During the events of April 16, 2007, Virginia Tech did not comply with its own policy on the issuance of timely warning as published in its campus security reports. The university policy that was in place on April 16, 2007 was vague and did not provide students and employees with actual notice of the types of events that would warrant a timely warning or explain how those warnings would be transmitted.”
THANDIWE OGBONNA/COLLEGIATE TIMES
report, Tech could face a fine of up to $55,000. The university could appeal the fine, but the findings will be final. Security on Campus Inc. initially filed the request that led to the investigation. The group was founded by the parents of Jeanne Clery, the namesake of the Clery Act, which was enacted in 1990 and requires universities to report crime statistics and give communities timely warnings of campus crimes. Clery was raped and murdered in her dorm room at Lehigh University in 1986. The report asserts Tech officials knew enough about the situation to warn the community prior to the first mass email sent at 9:26 a.m. on the day of the shootings. Tech’s response counters with examples and arguments that a “timely warning” on a college campus has no quantitative definition and has not typically been expected within two hours of an incident. “The record clearly supports that a ‘timely warning’ is provided at best sev-
eral hours post incident and normally within 24 to 48 hours,” the response said. Michael Mulhare, director of Tech’s office of emergency management, prepared the university’s 73-page response. After the report was made public Tuesday afternoon, he said the notion of a “timely warning” was not clearly defined, and his response attempted to show that. “I think that’s what the report does a very good job of — it demonstrates that the guidance documents provided by the Department of Education refer to timely warning and when you look at what its examples and illustrations of what a timely warning is, it is certainly measured in 48 hours,” Mulhare said. “So, clearly, ‘timely warning,’ prior to the events that happened on our campus, was something that happened in days, not minutes.” Daniel Carter, Security on Campus director of public policy, pointed to a see REPORT / page two
Tech professors speak out against Cuccinelli investigation LIANA BAYNE news editor Virginia Tech faculty and researchers have weighed in on another of Virginia Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli’s recent forays into state university policies. About 70 Tech faculty members, among almost 740 others from universities around the state, signed a letter sponsored by the Union of Concerned Scientists, which was sent to Cuccinelli on May 18. The letter expressed concerns over Cuccinelli’s current investigation into allegedly fraudulent research on global warming conducted by former University of Virginia professor Michael Mann
and discouraged Cuccinelli from continuing the investigation. “In the interests of the people of Virginia, we urge you to halt this burdensome and entirely unwarranted investigation,” the letter read. In an effort to discover evidence to support the claim that Mann tampered with data to reach his conclusions about global warming, Cuccinelli’s office has requested numerous e-mail correspondence between Mann and various other researchers, as well as all other documents and information generated by Mann since 1998. Cuccinelli served that request in the form of a civil investigative demand, which has essentially the same powers as a subpoena, to the rector and mem-
bers of the UVa Board of Visitors on April 28. The demand seeks to determine whether Mann engaged in fraudulent practices as defined by the Virginia Fraud Against Taxpayers Act during his research on global climate change, specifically pertaining to research for which he was awarded about $485,000 of state grant money. The deadline for UVa to respond to the demand is today. The letter from the Union of Concerned Scientists called the civil investigative demand “unfounded,” saying it “could undermine the effectiveness of not only climate scientists but also thousands of other Virginia researchers.”
“The freedom of scientists to openly disagree and discuss critical scientific topics has brought Virginia and the United States prosperity and global leadership in science,” the letter said. “Research shows that scientific discovery is held back when government officials harass scientists.” Mann was an assistant professor at UVa between 1999 and 2005 when he moved to Penn State University. He has been at the forefront of research on climate change and global warming since the early 2000s. Among his notable research was the development of the “hockey stick graph,” which shows global temperature to have remained consistent until 1900, at which point a drastic increase occurs.
Mann used paleontological evidence such as tree rings to support his conclusions. Many Tech faculty members who do not work in the field of climate research and had not been closely following Mann’s work have nonetheless added their signatures to the letter of public support. Ted Koebel, department chair of Tech’s urban affairs and planning program, signed the letter because he opposed Cuccinelli’s actions, calling them “politically motivated intrusions.” “The whole thing is bogus,” Koebel said. “This is a step back toward the Dark Ages.”
BREAKING NEWS, MULTIMEDIA, UPDATES AND MORE AVAILABLE ONLINE AT COLLEGIATETIMES.COM
see CUCCINELLI / page three