BRIEFING NOTE
PALESTINE
APRIL 2016
Tasks set by the CPB Congress November 2014 On Palestine: strengthening the wider organisational support for the full implementation of UN resolutions on Palestine. For the national right of the Palestine people for a state of their own, for the interim UN recognition of Palestinian statehood and for the release of all political prisoners including Marwan Barghouti. Recognising the historic responsibility of the British people to the people of Palestine and the continued sale of arms to Israel by the British government, a major priority for party members continues to be challenging the British state in every way possible on these matters. It is also necessary to constantly challenge the shameful misreporting of the media and the BBC that put forward zionism’s narrative of victimhood. All party publications on Palestine will clearly identify the struggle of the Palestinian people as one of national liberation from occupation and oppression and promote and encourage participation in the boycott, divestment and sanctions campaign, including sporting and cultural activities, as a pressure mechanism for a negotiated settlement to establish a Palestinian state in accordance with UN resolutions.
Statements of the 14thand 15thInternational Meetings of Communist and Workers Parties December 2012 and November 2013 and 2014 2012: ‘Condemning the on-going atrocities perpetuated by the Israeli occupying forces against the Palestinian people, supporting their right in resisting occupation, and building their independent state, East Jerusalem as a capital, and strengthening the campaign for the immediate lifting of the blockade against Gaza and for the Right of Return.’ 2013 and 2014 Press Releases: Reiterated previous commitments and ‘re-affirmed its solidarity with the Palestinian people and their struggle national rights.’
Israel’s geopolitical alliances Palestine became a British Mandate under the League of Nations in 1922. Prior to 1945 Britain used Jewish immigration to stabilise its military grip on Palestine in face of repeated Arab insurgency. After 1945 and prior to the formal end of the British mandate in 1948 Britain resisted Jewish attempts to establish a separate state for fear of alienating support in its Arab client states (Egypt, Jordon, Iraq). After the Naqba of 1948, when Jewish settlers drove Palestinians from Western Palestine, the US was the first state to recognise Israel. However, the US also remained wary of full support in face of its wider objectives of ending Soviet regional influence and securing oil supplies in Saudi Arabia and Iran. In the 1950s Israel’s closest ally was France who supplied nuclear bomb technology from 1957.Israel also developed military links with Apartheid South Africa. US links with Israel became institutionalised under the Reagan presidency with military supply agreements from 1981 and the US-Israel Joint Economic Development Conference from 1985. Since the 1990s US financial aid to Israel has been running at around $3 billion a year. Israel has an army of 175,000 with 445,000 reservists. Most of its equipment comes from the US. Israeli government policy towards the PLO and the occupied territories has moved tactically back and forth from negotiation to repression. The policy of the Israeli state apparatus and intelligence service has been to seek to make occupation irreversible through increasing settlements, the cutting off of water supplies from Palestinian villages and the constructing the Wall across the West Bank to make Palestinian transport and communication increasingly impossible. There are currently upwards of 4,400 Palestinian political prisoners in Israeli jails and up to 700 children. There are 321,000 Israelis in the illegal West Bank settlements and another 100,000 in East Jerusalem. Over the past decade US regional strategy was to consolidate the position of pro-US authoritarian Arab governments in order to isolate Iran. Historically the US has needed Israel as a military base that is totally reliable in an instable region - but not as a state with policies that undermine its