National College for Community Dance
DANCE AND AGE INCLUSIVE PRACTICE Pathway to practice for dance leaders bringing different age groups together in their communities
By Ruth Pethybridge
Handbook published by Foundation for Community Dance for people leading dance in community settings and contexts.
!"#$%#$&'' ' Foreword
2
About Ruth
3
Acknowledgements
5
Introduction
7
()*$'"#%'!"#$%+$''
'
1 Age inclusive practice in context
10
2 Current policy and practice
13
()*$'$,"'(*)-$.-%'/#",0%12%''
'
1 Changing bodies and minds
18
2 Case study: Early years by Oksana Tyminska
27
3 Touch in age inclusive practice
29
4 Health and safety
33
5 Effective practice
34
6 Reflection
36
7 Example case studies
39
8 Evaluating age inclusive practice
40
()*$'$3*%%'(*)-$.-%''
'
Case Studies 1 Rosemary Lee: Common Dance
44
2 Cecilia Macfarlane: Age inclusive practice
48
3 Angela Praed: Duets for Unusual Souls
52
Article from Animated, FCD’s community dance magazine 4 Marks of Time by Bisakha Sarker
55
4.50."2*)6378'9%:%*%#-%&')#1';&%:;0'*%&";*-%&
59
#$%%&'()*+,'#-.$/0.&12',)($',3#$33-0-!
"!
!"#$%"&'()*+&,%"-./(0&(%"&'"(1'0%20 " 34/0"51"6%"7%/'"89":/$%"&'()*+&,%;<" " Age inclusive practice refers, in this
change, with a diminution of what might be
context, to dance practices that are
seen as control. But this is actually the true gift
open to all, regardless of age. It refers
of diversity. It is not only the variety and range it
to projects and policies that em brace
brings, but the way in which it encourages a
all ages and encourage people to work
transformative process across society, in
across generations.
everybody, in whatever way involved: top to bottom.” (Khan, 2004)
‘Intergenerational’ is a more commonly used term. However, this can be limiting in that it
So where we place ourselves as practitioners in
often refers to interactions between ‘older’ and
our work has implications for how ‘inclusive’ a
‘younger’ people, who are defined in
particular project is. How an organisation is
government policy as over 50 and under 25 –
structured or how participants perceive
as such leaving out a 25 year gap! This span in
themselves is all key in inclusion.
the middle should not be forgotten as it can lead to an invisibility of voices from the middle
A key factor in much intergenerational literature
generation. ‘Age inclusive’ indicates a more
is that any activity must be m utually
fluid approach to how a project is defined in
beneficial to both age groups (note the use of
relation to the ages of those taking part and
both here delineating two!) but this is a very
allows us to define it for ourselves in practice.
important point….the relationship has to be two way and the projects need to be designed to
To work in an inclusive way is fundamental to
cater for, and appeal to, all ages; not just for
the values of community dance, working in the
the benefit of one group. The Centre for
field most practitioners make it their business
Intergenerational Practice also states that:
to be as ‘inclusive’ as possible. However, it is important that we reassess what this means to
“Different generations should be involved in an
us and how it is embodied in the work we do
activity on an equal basis.”
and within individual projects. Naseem Khan
(www.centreforip.org.uk)
points out that: This is not the case for all intergenerational “Inclusion is a challenging business. It involves
activity, in some instances it is one generation
the readiness to enter into a top to bottom
supporting another – particularly in
rethink. It also means the readiness to accept
volunteering or mentoring initiatives; as long as
$%&&'()*+,-($./%01/'23(-*)%(-4$%44.1.#
!"#
!"#$%&'(&'")*+(,-"%&+".(&+-" This section will take you on a whistle-
There isn’t a finite answer to this, but I think as
stop tour of hum an growth and
practitioners, although we know there are
developm ent. This is a huge subject
things we do differently with specific age
area due to the com plex and fascinating
groups, let’s also blur the boundaries and be
thing that is a hum an being and it
flexible in our approach. Whatever the setting,
cannot all be covered here. Instead,
we need to respond to people as individuals.
this section will give you a general view
Particularly when working in an age inclusive
of som e of the im portant factors to take
way you really have to think holistically about
into account when leading dance with
your participants as neither they nor you have
different ages and draw on m y personal
the normal peer group markers
experiences. Also useful to bear in mind is the idea of Conceptually, what this does is start us thinking
translation. Think about how participants
about the requirements of different age groups
are doing something, not what they are doing.
and we begin again with age-based
This philosophy is central to Cecilia’s practice
classifications. This can be problematic in age
and means that any of the ideas you work with
inclusive work because, as Jabadao puts it:
are translatable to any age and any body, although you may have to frame them
“Human development is a discontinuous, self-
differently or use different language.
organising, transactional process between the task, the individual, and the environment
There is a responsibility on the dance leader to
throughout a person’s life.” (www.jabadao.org)
create an environment where this is allowed and also to nurture and inform what the
This is a problem that my colleague, Cecilia
possibilities are for that translation. This
Macfarlane, and I came across when
philosophy provides ownership of the
researching the book Any Age, Any Body, Any
choreography and empowers participants to
Dance (1) too – how do we acknowledge the
make choices…something that all community
different needs of different groups without
dance seeks to do, to a greater or lesser extent.
limiting them, (doing exactly what we set out not to) and boxing them in?
(1) This was a document produced as part of a research period supported by Coventry University and is not yet published. $%&&'()*+,-($./%01/'23(-*)%(-4$%44.1.#
!"#
...
)'*%'+, on your own experiences as you read these.
Some of this won’t be new to you and some of it will – maybe it will remind you of skills you have or activities you have tried. The boxes include specific questions to ask yourself.
! "#$%&!&'#$(! In the 0-6 m onths of infancy sm all
providing clear ‘rules’ or end points in an
children are in what M acgregor refers to
activity for example. They also respond well to
as the “rhythm ic stereotype”
‘framing’ – providing a physical structure for
(M acgregor, 2000) – they like to bang
them to explore. The important thing to
things, kick things and love repetition…I
remember here though is to also reverse this so
think it is im portant as practitioners
that the child can also be the structure that is
that we are not to be afraid of
explored. One of my favourite exercises is the
repetition, there can be a tendency to
bridge, where I watch parents squeezing
think we m ust entertain with new ideas
underneath their two year old’s tiny bridge
but actually repetition provides safety
much to the delight of the latter (how many
and a sense of growing confidence.
different bridges can you make?). Similarly,
Drum s and basic instrum ental
creating a ‘sculpture’ or climbing frame to be
accom panim ent is a wonderful resource
explored works well.
with young babies. I work a lot with stories and imagery with the One of the main things I found interesting with
under 5s who are so wonderful at using their
toddlers’ physicality is the relatively large size of
imaginations and doing what leading child
their heads, two times that of us as adults –
development theorist Piaget calls “magical
imagine that! A toddler’s gait, often associated
thinking”. (Boden, 1994)
with nappies, is actually to support the weight of the head. Early years children can be very
I always start and end the story the same way,
goal orientated so you might want to design
providing a structure….the children curl up and
activities that capitalise on this, by
fall fast asleep and at the end they always find their way back to where they started.
$%&&'()*+,-($./%01/'23(-*)%(-4$%44.1.#
!"#
!"#$%&'%()*+"%+,")*-&'.)$,"/0%-()-," “Not everything that counts can be counted, and not everything that can be counted, counts.” (from a sign in Albert Einstein’s Princeton office)
Evaluation doesn’t have to be facts and figures! The evidence collected is often qualitative rather than quantitative, although a good evaluation will probably include both. With a qualitative approach, make sure the language being used is properly documenting and representing participants’ experiences, and look at how you use language when engaging in evaluation, i.e. bearing in mind who it is for. In order to evaluate effectiveness it is also important that you have criteria in the first place with which to place results against: your aims and objectives. It is also important that the evaluation process is active and begins from the beginning of your project (by finding out what participants want and by ‘checking in’ throughout the process). Below is a selection of tips for evaluation that I have gathered from various sources including the Arts Council and the Centre for Intergenerational Practice.
123",$%&'%(,4" "
•
To understand how our work develops and changes before, during and after a project
•
To critically reflect on our artistic process and practice
•
To help participants reflect on their experiences and feel empowered to have their say
•
To help us identify gaps and future directions
•
To demonstrate accountability and transparency
•
To make the impact of work or ‘what happened’ known to a wider audience
•
To help us secure funding
•
To influence and respond to policy and practice.
“Evaluation is a valuable tool for learning and involves critical analysis of your activities. Artists all make evaluative judgements about their work and evaluation makes the ‘reflective practice of creative work explicit and conscious’. (Moriarty, 2002).” (Arts Council, 2005)
$%&&'()*+,-($./%01/'23(-*)%(-4$%44.1.#
!"#
A Foundation for Community Dance Publication
The Foundation for Community Dance is the professional organisation for anyone involved in creating opportunities for people to experience and participate in dance. The National College for Community Dance is FCDâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s home for professional development pathways for people delivering dance in community settings and contexts. It delivers courses, seminars, flexible online learning opportunities and advocates for professional development opportunities UK wide and internationally for dance leadership in the community.
Foundation for Community Dance LCB Depot, 31, Rutland Street, Leicester, LE1 1RE Tel: +44 (0)116 253 3453 E-mail: info@communitydance.org.uk Web: www.communitydance.org.uk Company limited by guarantee, registered in England and Wales no. 2415458 Registered Charity no. 328392