CONCACAF Under-15 Championship 2013 by Concacaf

TECHNICAL REPORT U-15 CHAMPIONSHIP CAYMAN ISLANDS 2013

I-Introduction.

Pag 7

II. Players and winning teams.

Pag 8

III.Statistics.

Pag 11

a- Match results (group stage, semifinals and finals). b- Table positions of the teams in the different groups. c- Most valuable players per game. d- Scorers list. e- Statistics of the teams in the tournament. f- Lineup changes made by teams in different matches. g- Tables position of the Sub-15 event in Cayman Islands. h- Standing ranking Table of the goalkeepers and goalkeeper of the tournament. i- Standing summary per countries (goals, cards, Highlights). j- Most valuable player in each team. k- Finals statistics Standing (cards, goals, lineup changes, highlight per teams, and best player per game) l- Period of time in which the goals were scored. IV. General comments of main aspets in the aspects.

Pag 29

V. Analysis per team.

Pag 34

VI. Conclusions.

Pag 122

VII. Recommendations. Pag 122

FOREWORD OF PRESIDENT

Under-15 Boys Championship Message, President Webb

A critical step in achieving greatness and realizing the highest potential in this game is to develop young talent and reach our goal of winning the World Cup. We clearly recognize the importance of their development and the opportunity to prepare and mold our next generation of superstars. For this reason, we created an Under 15 championship to enrich the lives of the region’s talent with good values, confidence and an excellent platform to advance forward. I am proud that the inaugural Boy’s Under-15 Championship was a huge success for players, coaches, referees and spectators, with the added benefit of having an outstanding sporting environment in the Cayman Islands. The game brought together a great mix of cultures and intense passion for the game. Crowd participation surpassed expectations, with approximately 21,000 spectators overall, a significant number for the inaugural tournament. With an aggressive schedule of 55 matches over 11 days and 393 players, we were impressed with the level of play by the teams and we are confident that this exemplary championship will prove to be a milestone in the region’s continued development. The tournament’s success resonated in several ways. The competition not only demonstrated the impact of football to the lives of these young players, but also showcased the importance social development within countries throughout the region. I would like to thank all the sponsors, member associations, teams, referees and volunteers for placing this inaugural Under 15 Boys Championship on the global map. We look forward to building on this strong foundation as we continue to involve our youth in events that will motivate and fortify them. Our vision and goal for the next generation of football is for these young players to develop their talent and advance to showcase them on the global stage.

Jeffrey Webb President

The Technical Study Group (TSG) was comprised by:

1. Luis Hernandez Herez (Cuba), CONCACAF Executive Committee member, Head of TSG. 2. Alexander González Garcés. (Cuba) Specialist. 3. Ramón Enrique Madariaga Chávez (Honduras) Specialist. 4. Juan Carlos Chavez (Mexico) Specialist. 5. Carl Brown. Jamaica. Specialist. 6. Mario Balioty. Martinique. Specialist. 7. Luis Manuel Hernandez Valdivia (Cuba), TSG Coordinator. The TSG performed the following functions:

- Technical and tactical analysis and match report of each game. - Interview to all team coaches by a questionnaire. - Compilation of Match statistics. - Fair Play Team selection for each match and for the tournament. - MVP selected for each game and highlights per team. - Selection of the most outstanding Goalkeeper of the tournament. - Selection of the All-Star team. - Preparation of the preliminary and final report of the tournament. - Analysis of the performance of all players participating in the event. - Final Analysis of all participating teams technical, tactical and physical.

I. I. Introduction. We can say that with the celebration of this tournament, it was real the dream of all the countries of CONCACAF. Having our own event sub 15 with a large participation of young athletes and carry it out in a similar way to the rest of the World Confederation. This is one of the most important goals started in the direction of development, growth and organization of football in the area. The beautiful Cayman Islands has been an excellent venue and has hosted this show with a high responsibility providing all the government support and all different institutions necessary for a successful implementation. Three stadiums (Truman Bodden, Ed Bush and Annex) welcome for their location and game scenarios have served our youth to show their skills. Finally attended by 22 countries together with the 5 other countries such as Cuba, Mexico, USA, Costa Rica, Panama, and Canada that were in the tournament in Mexico for 28 countries of CONCACAF área which competed in this category. Never before this goal had been achieved at these ages. All teams showed properly uniformed colorfull and demonstrated their football cravings. The quality and the tenacity showed in every encounter sparked interest in the public, which fully supported the teams of a country with no tradition in this sport. At each meeting was held a first level organizational system with class demands and schedules in each activity. Finally, the parades, the organization, flags and national anthems were a well emotional show for these young figures. Apart from the differences in the level of competition among the teams, we can state that all players competed with a high spirit of Fair Play and played with passion to win. This event and its successful development made a commitment to all of us to provide continuity and obligation to form stable part in CONCACAF competitive calendar.

II. Players and winning teams.

Most Valuable Player: Darixon Vuelto (# 10, Honduras).

Top Scorer: (12). Young Leighton Thomas (# 11, I. Cayman).

Best Goalkeeper: Wilmer Martinez (# 12, Honduras).

Fair Play Award: Bermuda Team.

All-Star Team:

Goalkeeper: Central defender: Central defender: Left Side: Right-back: Steering Right: Central Midfielder: Steering Left: Left Forward: Central Forward: Right Forward:

Wilmer Martiﾌ］ez Marie Santie Andrew Mario Humberto Rodas Viﾌ…tor Manuel Valdez Dylan Andrade Amar Lewis Yvan Macon Diego Morale Esteban Gabriel Torres Leighton Young Thomas Darixon Vuelto

(# 12, Honduras) (# 7, Martinica) (# 5, Guatemala) (# 16, Guatemala ) (# 6, Honduras) (# 5, Bermuda) (# 8, Guadalupe) (# 5, Honduras) (# 18, Guatemala) (#11, Cayman) (# 10, Honduras)

III. Statics A -RESULTS PER GROUP STAGE

August 13th US Virgin I. St. Lucia Jamaica Aruba Cayman I.

0–8 Bermuda 0-1 Belice 4–0 Granada 4-0 Bahamas 12-0 St. Maarten

St. Maarten Aruba Grenada St. Vincent Guatemala Cayman I.

August 18th 2–3 US. Virgin I. 1–3 Bermuda. 2–0 St. Lucia 0-2 Haití 1-0 Belice 3–1 Bahamas

August 14th El Salvador Curacao Martinique Honduras

3-0 Antigua & Barbuda 0-6 Guadalupe 1-2 Puerto Rico 5-0 St. Martin

August 15th Aruba 6-0 St. Maarten Guadalupe 5-1 St Kitts & N. Antigua & B. 2-1 St. Vincent. Curacao 1-4 St Martin Bahamas 0-1 Bermuda Jamaica 2–0 St. Lucia Martinique 4-0 Haiti Guatemala 5–0 Grenada Cayman I. 8-0 US Virgin I. Puerto Rico 1–3 El Salvador August 16th Aruba 10-0 US Virgin I. Bahamas 8-0 St Maaten Jamaica 1-3 Belice Guatemala 5-1 St. Lucia Cayman I. 1-3 Bermuda August 17th Guadalupe 2-1 St. Martin Haiti 5-1 Antigua & B. El Salvador 1-1 Martinique Honduras St. 6-0 St. Kitts & N. Vincent 0-6 Puerto Rico

August 19th Curacao Puerto Rico St. Vincent Martinique Honduras

2-4 St. Kitts & N. 0-1 Haiti 1-4 El Salvador 2-0 Antigua&B. 2-0 Guadalupe August 20th

St. Martin El Salvador Antigua & B. Martinique Honduras

1-5 St. Kitts & N. 1-1 Haiti 0-5 Puerto Rico 7-0 St. Vincent 5-0 Curacao August 21th

St. Martin El Salvador Antigua & B. Martinique Honduras

1-5 St. Kitts & N. 1-1 Haití 0-5 Puerto Rico 7-0 St Vicent 5-0 Curacao

Semifinals / July 23rd Bermuda (penal) 1-1 El Salvador 2-4 Honduras 2-1 El Salvador Final / July 25th Bermuda 0-2 El Salvador Guatemala 1-2 Honduras

B. TGROUP STAGE STANDINGS CHART

Grupo A

Puntos

Cayman

5 4 1 0 27 6 21 4 0 12

Aruba

5 3 2 0 23 7 16 4 1

Bahamas

5 1 3 1 11 10 1 5 0 4

St. Maarten

5 0 5 0 2 34 -32 2 0 0

US Virgin Islands

Bermuda*

5 5 0 0 20 4 16 1 0

Grupo B

-25

4 15

Puntos

Jamaica

4 2 2 0 7 4 3 2 0 6

Guatemala*

4 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 12 0

Grenada

4 1 3 0 3 15 -2 2 0

St. Lucia

4 0 4 0 11 0 -9 2 0 0

Belize

4 3 1 0 10 2 8 3 0

Grupo C

3 9

Puntos

Honduras*

4 4 0 0 18 2 16 2 0 12

Curacao

4 0 4 0 3 19 -16 7 2 0

Guadeloupe

4 3 1 0 13 4 9 1 0

St. Martin

-7

St. Kitts

-3

Grupo D

Puntos

Haiti

5 3 1 1 9 6 3 5 0 10

Martinique

5 3 1 1 15 3 12 3 0 10

Puerto Rico

El9Salvador*

5 3 0 2 12 6 6 3 0

St. Vincent

5 0 5 0 2 21 -19 3 1 0

Antigua & Barbuda

GP W L

Total de Partidos Jugados Total de Partidos Ganados Total de Partidos Perdidos

1 D GF GA

Total de Partidos Empatado Total de Goles a Favor Total de Goles en Contra

-13 GD YC RC

9 11

Diferencia de Goles Total de Tarjetas Amarillas Total de Tarjetas Rojas

C. MOST VALUABLE PLAYERS PER GAME.

Partidos

Nombre

# Jugador

Paiﾌ《

Juego #1 US Virgins Islands vs Bermuda

Osagi Bascome

Bermuda

Juego #2 St Lucia vs Belize

Alvin Sifontes

Belice

Juego #3 Jamaica vs Grenada

Deshawn Beckford

Jamaica

juego #4 Aruba vs Bahamas

Denrick Lopez

Aruba

Leighton Thomas Jr.

Cayman

Kevin Martinez Ramos

El Salvador

Lory Chouan

Guadalupe

Juego #8 Martinique vs Puerto Rico

John Henriquez

Puerto'Rico

Juego #9 Honduras vs St. Martin

Darixon Vuelto

Honduras

JeanRPierre Van Der Linden

Aruba

Juego #11 Guadeloupe vs St Kitts

Yvann Macon

Guadalupe

Juego #12 Antigua B. St. Vincent

Javorn Stevens

Antigua B.

Juego #14 Curacao vs St Martin

Federic Reymond

Saint Martin

Juego #15 Bahamas vs Bermuda

Osagi Bascome

Bermuda

Juego #16 Jamaica vs St. Lucia

Peter Cambell

Jamaica

Juego #17 Martinica vs Haiti

Kendrick Agot

Martinique

Esteban Garcia Velazquez

Guatemala

Juego #19 Cayman vs US Islas Virgin

Leighton Thomas Jr.

Cayman Islands

Juego #20 Puerto Rico vs El Salvador

Carlos Herrera Romero

El Salvador

juego #21 Aruba vs US Islas Virgin

Jean Pierre Van Der Linden

Aruba

Juego #22 Bahamas vs St. Marteen

Nikolas Plakaris

Bahamas

Juego #23 Jamaica vs Belice

Randy Augustine

Belize

Esteban Garcia Velazquez

Guatemala

Oneko Lowe

Bermuda

Juego #26 Guadalupe vs St Martin

Loic Antonides

Guadeloupe

Juego #27 Haiti vs Antigua Barbuda

Johnson Jeudy

Haiti

Juego #28 El Salvador vs Martinique

Kevin'Martinez

El Salvador

Juego #29 Honduras vs St.Kitts

Darixon Vuelto

Honduras

Juego #30 St. Vincent vs Puerto Rico

Ryan Lopez

Puerto Rico

Juego #31 St.Marteen vs US Virgen Islands

Luke-Patrie

Us Virgin Islands

Juego #5 Cayman vs St Maarten Juego #6 El Salvador vs Antigua B. Juego #7 Curasao vs Guadalupe

Juego #10 Aruba vs St Maarten

Jueg o#18 Guatemala vs Grenada

Juego #24 Guatemala vs St. Lucia Juego #25 Cayman vs Bermuda

Juego #32 Aruba vs Bermda

Jai-Zel Smith-Deshilds

Bermuda

Juego #33 Grenada vs St.Lucia

Rickell Charles

Grenada

Juego #34 St Vincent vs Haiti

Thermidor-Fils Aim

Haiti

Juego #35 Guatemala vs Belice

Francisco Cifuentes

Guatemala

Juego #36 Cayman vs Bahamas

Zachary-Scott

Cayman Islands

Juego #37 Curasao vs St.Kitts 6

Nevis Geovannie Lake

St Kitts & Nevis

Juego #38 Haiti vs Puerto Rico

Tchekvoh7Kevin Amede

Haiti

Josue Melendez

El Salvador

Juego #40 Martinica & Antigua B.

Youri Oscar

Martinique

Juego #41 Honduras vs Guadalupe

Darixon-Vuelto

Honduras

Nick Muriel

Us Virgin I.

Randy Augustine

Belize

Francisco Cifuentes

Guatemala

Aaron Burgess

Bermuda

Juego #46 Cayman vs Aruba

Leighton Thomas Jr

Cayman Islands

Juego #47 Martin vs St Kitts & Nevis

Mitchum Y. Menelik

St Kitts & Nevis

Kevin Zidane Martiez

El Salvador

Joshua Rivera

Puerto Rico

Juego #50 Martinique vs St. Vincent.

Youri Oscar

Martinica

Jueg o#51 Honduras vs Curasao

Italo Ramos

Honduras

Juego #56 Bermudas vs Guatemala

Esteban Garcia Velasquez

Guatemala

Juego #57 Honduras vs El Salvador

Italo Ramos

Honduras

Juego #58 El Salvador vs Bermuda

Amar Lewis

Bermuda

Juego#59 Honduras vs Guatemala

Darixon Vuelto

Honduras

Juego #39 El Salvador vs St Vincent

Juego #42 Bahamas vs US Virgin Islands Juego #43 Grenada vs Belice Juego #44 Jamaica vs Guatemala Juego #45 St. Marteen vs Bermuda

Juego #48 El Salvador vs Haiti Juego #49 Antigua & B. Vs Puerto Rico

D. SCORERS LIST.

12 Leighton Thomas Jr. (CAYMAN ISLANDS)

Ethan Willie (BAHAMAS)

10 Jean Pierre Van Der Linden (ARUBA)

Johnson Jeudy (HAITI)

Darixon Vuelto (HONDURAS)

Juan Camareno (PUERTO RICO)

Esteban García Velázquez (GUATEMALA)

Kevin Martínez (EL SALVADOR)

Francisco Cifuentes (GUATEMALA)

Knori Scott (BERMUDA)

Ítalo Ramos (HONDURAS)

Kondjo Zebina (MARTINIQUE)

John Henrique (PUERTO RICO)

Ludwig Francillette (GUADELOUPE)

Federic Reymond(SAINT MARTIN)

Luther Archimede (GUADELOUPE)

Geovannie Lake (ST KITTS & NEVIS)

Marco Arocha (PUERTO RICO)

Hedson Nattes (MARTINIQUE)

Mark Samuels (BELIZE)

Jai-Zei Smith-Deshields (BERMUDA)

Omri Williams (BAHAMAS)

Oneko Lowe (BERMUDA)

Oscar García Arias (ARUBA)

Randy Augustine (BELIZE)

Péguy Joseph (HAITI)

Alvin Sifontes (BELIZE)

Ryan Jackson (CAYMAN ISLANDS)

Derick López (ARUBA)

Ryan López (PUERTO RICO)

Geordy Choisi (GUADELOUPE)

Terry Joseph Mosko (BAHAMAS)

Javorn Stevens (ANTIGUA & BARBUDA)

Thermidor Fils-Aime (HAITI)

Jean Carlos V argas (HONDURAS)

Yohannes Mitchum (ST KITTS & NEVIS

Josué Meléndez (EL SALVADOR)

Zachary Scott (CAYMAN ISLANDS)

Kendrick Agot (MARTINIQUE)

Aarón Burgess (BERMUDA)

Loic Antonides (GUADELOUPE)

Akeem Charles (ARUBA)

Osagi Bascome (BERMUDA)

Álvaro Hernández (GUATEMALA)

Peter Cambell (JAMAICA)

Amar Lewis (BERMUDA)

Ryan Illes (ARUBA)

Andrew Sainte (MARTINIQUE)

Sebastián Martínez (CAYMAN ISLANDS)

Antonio Hanna (BAHAMAS)

Steve Archibald Jr. (ST KITTS & NEVIS)

Benoit Gedeon (GUADELOUPE)

Ahria Simons (BERMUDA)

Brandon Potmis (SINT MAARTEN)

Angelo Thelusme (HAITI)

Christopher Jansen (ARUBA)

Bryan Mont (MARTINIQUE)

Christopher Leung (ARUBA)

Cameron Gray (CAYMAN ISLANDS)

Dante Nicholas (US VIRGIN ISLANDS)

Carlos Herrera Romero (EL SALVADOR)

Dante Ramoon (CAYMAN ISLANDS)

Chelon Edgehill (GRENADA)

Dean Lynford Lourensz (CURACAO)

Elijah Seymour (CAYMAN ISLANDS)

Diego Lima (GUATEMALA)

Emerson R. Palacios (EL SALVADOR)

Diego Rosales (HONDURAS)

Diego Villeda (HONDURAS)

Melgar Behrens (GUATEMALA)

Diylan Andrade (HONDURAS)

Naigel Valorian (CURACAO)

Edwin Manzanares (HONDURAS)

Néstor Alfaro Torres (EL SALVADOR)

Ekiel Greenidge (SAINT LUCIA)

Nicholas Nelson (JAMAICA)

Ethan Calister (ARUBA)

Nicholas Plakaris (BAHAMAS)

Gerardo Molina Ruiz (EL SALVADOR)

Rashuan Simón (OG) (BERMUDA)

Grant Farrell (US VIRGIN ISLANDS)

Re’John Ene (BAHAMAS)

Heindrix Hebreu (GUADELOUPE)

Rene Leslie (BELIZE)

Henry Reyes (EL SALVADOR)

Reno Brooks (US VIRGIN ISLANDS)

Hesus Pietersz (CURACAO)

Rickell Charles (GRENADA)

Hugo Champion (SAINT MARTIN)

Stanley Lisima (MARTINIQUE)

James Cook (OG)(SINT MAARTEN for USVI)

Steeven Philoces (MARTINIQUE)

Jason Fontalvo (ARUBA)

Stephan Malcolm (JAMAICA)

Jeimax Osorio (PUERTO RICO)

Tchekvoh-Kevin Amede (HAITI)

Jordan Lambe (BERMUDA)

Tevin Davis (ST. VI.T & THE GRENADINES)

Jordan McLean (CAYMAN ISLANDS)

Travis Boyles (BERMUDA)

Jorge Álvarez (HONDURAS)

Tyrique Francis (ST KITTS & NEVIS)

José Flores (EL SALVADOR)

Walter Rodríguez (HONDURAS)

Joshua Mackenzie (CAYMAN ISLANDS)

Yannick Dinane (SINT MAARTEN)

Joshua Rivera (PUERTO RICO)

Youri Louis Arthur (MARTINIQUE)

Joshua Bryan (SAINT MARTIN)

Jourdain Fletcher (JAMAICA)

Juan Martínez (EL SALVADOR) Judah

Chapman (BERMUDA)

Julio Rosado (PUERTO RICO)

Justin McMaster (JAMAICA)1

Kaicy Peniston (ST. VIN.& THE RENADINES)

Keegan Bischof (BAHAMAS)

Keshawn Edwards (BAHAMAS)

Kevin Ramos (EL SALVADOR)

Kray Foster (CAYMAN ISLANDS)

Kumar Serrant (US VIRGIN ISLANDS)

Lory Chouan (GUADELOUPE)

Mario Rodas (GUATEMALA)

e-Tournament teams statistics Tabla de Goles, Tarjetas y Diferencia de Goles de los Equipos PaiĚ s

GP W L D GF GA GD YC RC

Antigua & Barbuda

Aruba

5 3 2 0 23 7 16 4 1

Bahamas

5 1 3 1 11 10 1 5 0

Belize

4 3 1 0 10 2 8 3 0

Bermuda

7 5 1 1 21 4 17 3 0

Cayman

5 4 1 0 27 6 21 4 0

Curacao

4 0 4 0 3 19 -16 8 2

El Salvador

Grenada

4 1 3 0 3 15 -12 2 0

Guadeloupe

4 3 1 0 13 4 9 1 0

Guatemala

6 4 1 1 14 4 10 6 0

HaitiĚ

5 3 1 1 9 6 3 5 0

Honduras

6 6 0 0 22 2 20 5 0

Jamaica

4 2 2 0 7 4 3 2 0

Martinique

5 3 1 1 15 3 12 3 0

Puerto Rico

5 3 2 0 14 5 9 1 0

St. Kitts

-3

St. Lucia

-9

St. Maarten

-32

St. Martin

St. Vincent

-19

US Virgin Islands

-25

GP W L

Total de Partidos Jugados Total de Partidos Ganados Total de Partidos Perdidos

D GF GA

Total de Partidos Empatado Total de Goles a Favor Total de Goles en Contra

GD YC RC

-13

Diferencia de Goles Total de Tarjetas Amarillas Total de Tarjetas Rojas

f. REAL TIME PER GAME

Tiempo real de juego por partidos y la media del Torneo

Partidos

1 a 17.30 17.30 a 35 1er Tiempo 35 a 52.30 52.30 a 70 2do Tiempo T. Total

#1 US Virgins Is. vs Bermuda

10.30

10.15

20.45

8.40

11.15

19.55

40.00

#2&St Lucia vs Belize

8.10

8.42

16.52

8.26

8.05

16.31

32.83

#3 Jamaica vs Grenada

10.30

11.06

21.36

10.06

11.20

21.26

42.62

#4 Aruba vs Bahamas

9.32

8.18

17.50

9.15

8.59

17.74

35.24

#5 Cayman vs St Maarten

15.00

30.00

13.24

12.27

25.51

55.51

#6 El Salvador vs Antigua

10.00

10.48

20.48

10.46

9.26

19.72

40.20

#7 Curasao vs Guadalupe

12.50

11.10

23.60

10.12

22.00

32.12

55.72

#8 Martinique vs Puerto Rico

12.30

10.30

22.60

9.50

10.05

19.55

42.15

#9 Honduras vs St. Martin

11.00

9.00

20.00

9.00

19.00

28.00

48.00

#10 Aruba vs St Maarten

9.10

8.33

17.43

8.10

7.55

15.65

33.08

#11 Guadeloupe vs St Kitts

11.07

12.12

23.19

11.15

10.13

21.28

44.47

#12 Antigua B. St. Vincent

12.39

12.28

24.67

10.36

12.36

22.72

47.39

#14 Curacao vs St Martin

10.50

9.06

19.56

11.00

10.19

21.19

40.75

#15 Bahamas vs Bermuda

11.35

10.40

21.75

8.13

10.30

18.43

40.18

#16 Jamaica vs St. Lucia

10.40

10.30

20.70

10.50

11.00

21.50

42.20

#17 Martinica vs Haiti

10.21

9.20

19.41

9.47

9.49

18.96

38.37

#18 Guatemala vs Grenada

12.45

13.13

25.58

12.50

10.29

22.79

48.37

#19 Cayman vs US Islas Virgin

14.00

12.00

26.00

10.00

11.00

21.00

47.00

#20 Puerto Rico vs El Salvador

11.20

10.06

21.26

10.03

9.40

19.43

40.69

#21 Aruba&vs US&Islas Virgin

11.30

11.40

22.70

9.00

11.00

20.00

42.70

#22 Bahamas vs St. Marteen

9.18

10.14

19.32

9.58

8.37

17.95

37.27

#23 Jamaica vs Belice

9.00

9.20

18.20

9.30

12.00

21.30

39.50

#24 Guatemala vs St. Lucia

11.32

9.27

20.59

10.11

10.39

20.50

41.09

#25 Cayman vs Bermuda

9.04

10.08

19.12

8.57

8.05

16.62

35.74

#26 Guadalupe vs St Martin

9.29

10.55

19.84

9.25

10.47

19.72

39.56

#27 Haiti vs Antigua Barbuda

11.53

13.46

24.99

9.00

11.50

20.50

45.49

#28 El Salvador vs Martinique

11.40

8.30

19.70

12.20

10.30

22.50

42.20

#29 Honduras vs St.Kitts

10.41

11.10

21.51

9.51

12.05

21.56

43.07

#30 St. Vincent vs Puerto Rico

10.31

11.53

21.84

10.11

19.07

29.18

51.02

#31 St.Marteen vs US Virgen Isl.

9.29

8.38

17.67

9.39

10.57

19.96

37.63

#32 Aruba vs Bermda

9.50

9.30

18.80

10.30

11.40

21.70

40.50

#33 Grenada vs St.Lucia

11.15

9.44

20.59

8.52

10.29

18.81

39.40

#34 St Vincent vs Haiti

8.20

11.05

19.25

10.50

11.30

21.80

41.05

#35 Guatemala vs Belice

11.42

11.34

22.76

7.43

11.20

18.63

41.39

#36 Cayman vs Bahamas

9.23

9.22

18.45

10.33

10.11

20.44

38.89

#37 Curasao vs St.Kitts 6 Nevis

10.04

10.06

20.10

10.18

10.04

20.22

40.32

#38 Haiti vs Puerto Rico

8.19

11.00

19.19

6.20

8.35

14.55

33.74

#39 El Salvador vs St Vincent

11.35

12.38

23.73

9.56

10.27

19.83

43.56

#40 Martinica & Antigua B.

10.52

12.39

22.91

9.40

7.48

16.88

39.79

#41 Honduras vs Guadalupe

11.04

11.00

22.04

11.00

10.00

21.00

43.04

#42 Bahamas vs US Virgin Islands 10.22

11.17

21.39

9.10

10.25

19.35

40.74

Juego 43 Grenada vs Belice

10.05

11.42

21.47

8.03

9.51

17.54

39.01

#44 Jamaica vs Guatemala

8.14

10.21

18.35

8.47

11.54

20.01

38.36

#45 St. Marteen vs Bermuda

11.13

12.38

23.51

13.25

12.38

25.63

49.14

#46 Cayman vs Aruba

9.40

9.30

18.70

8.45

10.20

18.65

37.35

#47 St. Martin vs St Kitts Nevis

10.29

11.47

21.76

7.48

11.20

18.68

40.44

#48 El Salvador vs Haiti

10.39

10.26

20.65

9.31

10.16

19.47

40.12

#49 Antigua B. Vs Puerto&Rico

11.27

11.30

22.57

9.57

12.38

21.95

44.52

#50 Martinique vs St. Vincent.

9.02

9.05

18.07

8.50

7.49

15.99

34.06

#51 Honduras vs Curasao

11.39

12.08

23.47

8.53

12.05

20.58

44.05

#52 Bermuda vs Guatemala

9.12

11.20

20.32

10.41

8.45

18.86

39.18

#53 Honduras vs El&Salvador

9.01

9.13

18.14

9.12

12.00

21.12

39.26

#54 El salvador vs Bermuda(Bronze) 11.15 11.00 22.15 7.55 9.28 16.83 38.98 #55 Guatemala vs Honduras (Gold) 8.54 10.18 18.72 9.41 8.33 17.74 36.46 Promedio

10.43 10.58 21.01 9.56 10.79 20.35 41.36

g. POSITIONS CHART OF THE SUB-15 EVENT IN CAYMAN ISLANDS. Tabla de Posiciones Finales Sub-15 Cayman Islands POS TEAM/EQUIPO

P/PJ

W/G

D/E

L/P

GA/GC

GD/DG

PTS

1 Honduras

20 18

2 Guatemala

4 Bermuda

6 Martinique

7 Haiti

8 Aruba

10 Guadalupe

11 Belize

12 Jamaica

13 St. Kitts & Nevis

-4

14 Bahamas

15 Us Virgin Islands

-25

16 St. Martin

-7

17 Grenada

-12

18 Antigua & Barbuda

-13

19 St. Lucia

-9

20 Curacao

-16

21 St. Vicent & G

-19

22 St. Marten

-32

El Salvador Cayman Islands

Puerto Rico

h. Number of changes in lineups per game. Cantidad de Cambios en la AlineacioĚ n por Equipos

Equipos

F/2

F/3

F/4

F/5

F/6

F/7

Total

Prom.

Por Ciento

Antigua & Barbuda

1.00

5.56

Aruba

1 3 0 0 0 0 4 0.67 3.70

Bahamas

3 3 0 0 0 0 6 1.00 5.56

Belize

0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.17 0.93

Bermuda

1 2 1 3 0 0 7

Cayman

2 0 1 2 0 0 5 0.83 4.63

Curacao

6 0 0 0 0 0 6 1.00 5.56

El Salvador

Grenada

3 3 0 0 0 0 6 1.00 5.56

Guadeloupe

3 2 0 0 0 0 5 0.83 4.63

Guatemala

0 1 0 1 1 0 3 0.50 2.78

HaitiĚ

Honduras

0 0 7 0 0 0 7 1.17 6.48

Jamaica

1 0 4 0 0 0 5 0.83 4.63

Martinique

2 1 2 1 0 0 6 1.00 5.56

Puerto Rico

1.17

6.48

St. Kitts

1.00

5.56

St. Lucia

0.33

1.85

St. Maarten

0.17

0.93

St. Martin

0.50

2.78

St. Vincent

0.83

4.63

US Virgin Islands

0.83

4.63

Total

43 33 19 9 3 1 108

Promedio

1.79 1.38 0.79 0.38 0.13 0.04

Por-Ciento

39.81

30.56

17.59

8.33

1.17 6.48

1.00

5.56

18.00

2.78

100.00

i- MOST VALUABLE PLAYERS PER TEAM BY TSG RANKING. Mejor-Jugador-por-Equipo Equipo Antigua & Barbuda Aruba Bahamas Belize Bermuda

Nombre

Nº Posición Tj Ga Tja Tjr Na D M

Javorn Stevens

350 3

165.00

Jean Pierre Van Der Linden

329 10

2 347.00

Ethan Willie

6 Df/Mf 287 2 0 0 0 0 0 81.00

Randy Augustine

19 Fw 282 4 0 0 0 4 2 230.29

Osagi Bascome

20 Mf 396 3 0 0 0 4 2 22.57

Cayman

Leighton Young Thomas Jr

303 11

2 358.29

Curacao

Dean Lynford Anthony Louren

259

Kevin Zidane Martinez

Df/Mf

490 3

2 230.00

Grenada

Rickell Charles

280

130.00

Guadeloupe

Loïc Antonides

264 3

157.71

Guatemala

Francisco Spross Cifuentes

396 6

301.57

Thermidor Filsiaime

350 2

165.00

Honduras

Darixon Vuelto

327

361.71

Jamaica

Peter Cambell

10 Fw 173 3 0 0 0 2 1 139.71

Martinique

Agot Kendrick

6 Mf 350 3 0 0 0 3 1 180.00

Puerto Rico

John Henriquez

281

210.14

St. Kitts

Lake Geovannie Omarie

247

135.29

St. Lucia

Noah Nicholas

280 0

85.00

Brandon Lee Jeani Marie Potmis

Df\Mf

269

73.43

St. Martin

Federic Reymond

259 4

172.00

St. Vincent

Davis Tevin

342

68.86

Us Vigin Island

Luke Patrie

290

91.43

El Salvador

Haití

St. Maarten

92.00

Mejor-Jugador-Del-Evento Equipo Honduras

Nombre Darixon-Vuelto

Nº Posición Tj Ga Tja Tjr Na D M 10

Fw 327 8 2 0 0 5 4 361.71

J- Outstanding goalkeeper of the event. Tabla Resumen De Estadísticas De Porteros País Antigua & Barbuda Aruba Bahamas Belize Bermuda Cayman Curacao El Salvador Grenada Guadeloupe Guatemala Haiti Honduras Jamaica Martinique Puerto Rico St. Kitts St. Lucia St. Maarten St. Martin St. Vincent Us Virgin Islands País Honduras

Portero Dominique Lapierre0armande Kamarni Charles Bryan Erasmus Marvin Irausquin John Bostwick Ari Brathwaite Wayne Cadle Shevon Shamar Butenschoen Yanai Smith0davis 0 Matthew James Guitard Livingston Luke Bailey Finigan Huffington Bryan Alejandro Lacroes William Dylan Christopher Leonard P. Pedro Benjamin Medrano Benitez Gerson Yonatan Vasquez Reshane Houston Jeremy Richardson Bichara Jabour Jean Taillepierre Flavien Reznik B. Rodrigo Dimitri Roberto Carlos Pineda Franco Etienne Michelson Emmanuel Chery Micheal Perello Wilmer Martinez Jahvanni Grant Akeem Chambers Madkaud Mathieu Caserus Brandon Marco Rivera Ruben Lopez Browne Zaquelle Seth Gumbs Meneliek Shervin Barclett Andre Gustave Austel Ethan Richardson Gk Joshua Claudio Warsono Astrokarijo Jean Francois Petchy Nairobi Arrondell Butcher Nyron L0ewis Javil Jesse Wyatt Nick Muriel

No. Jugador Goles Per. Ranking 1 5 -40.14 22 11 -74.57 1 7 -9.86 22 0 4.86 1 10 -40.00 12 0 -5.00 1 2 19.86 27 0 0.14 1 4 30.00 0 0 0.00 1 3 -4.00 12 1 -1.00 23 2 -15.00 1 3 -30.00 22 16 -135.00 1 1 15.14 18 5 -19.86 1 15 -114.86 20 0 4.86 1 4 0.00 16 0 10.00 1 4 38.00 12 0 20.00 1 2 -3.71 12 4 -11.29 1 0 10.71 12 20 74.29 1 0 25.00 13 4 0.00 1 0 15.00 16 3 30.00 1 5 -20.00 13 0 15.00 1 7 -49.14 18 6 -45.86 1 10 -45.00 20 0 0.00 20 3 -29.00 10 31 -261.00 1 13 -76.14 27 0 1.14 1 2 -18.57 20 19 -145.29 1 0 0.00 18 30 -220.00

Tabla Del Portero De Mayor Ranking Portero No. Camiseta Wilmer Martinez 12

Goles Per. 2

Ranking 74.29

NOTE: This classification is based on a combination of objective criteria: 1) Minutes played, 2) Goals against, 3) Goals in favor, 4) Disciplinary actions (yellow / or red cards), 5) Selection as best player of the match, 6) Outstanding player per game and opinion from specialists of the Technical Study Group (TSG)

k. Tabla de estadísticas finales (Tarjetas, Goles, Cambios de alineación, destacados por Equipos). Tabla de Resumen por Países (Totales). Países

T. de Goles

T. de Destacados

T. de N. A

T.T. Rojas

Antigua & Barbuda 3

Aruba 23 12

4 1 4

Bahamas 11

Belize 10

Bermuda 21

Cayman 27

Curacao 3

El Salvador

Grenada 3

Guadeloupe 13

Guatemala 14

Haití 9

Honduras 22

Jamaica 7

Martinique 15

Puerto Rico 14

St. Kitts 10

St. Lucia 1

2 0 2

St. Maarten 2

St. Martin 6

3 0 3

St.*Vincent 2

US*Virgin*Islands 5

Total

T . T. Amarillas

236 262

108 6 85

l. Goals scored time We can see in the chart below that as in the previous tournaments as in the Final Mayor Caribbean, UNCAF 2013, Pre World SUB-20 Puebla, Mexico, Pre World Panama SUB-17 and World Gold Cup 2013, the most quatity of goals are scored in the last stage of the game due to physical problems of the teams and the missconcentration of the players in the final minutes of the meetings. 88 goals were scored in this tournament in the last period of time (44 to 70) which is above the rest of those listed in the initial ¾. The overall average of goals per game was 4.37, 236 goals were scaored throughout the event proving to be an offensive tournament.

Time the goals were scored. Partidos

1 a 17.30 17.30 a 35 1er Tiempo 35 a 52.30 52.30 a 70 2do Tiempo T. Total

#1 US Virgins Is. vs Bermuda

#2 St Lucia vs Belize

#3 Jamaica vs Grenada

#4 Aruba vs Bahamas

#5 Cayman vs St Maarten

#6 El Salvador vs Antigua

#7 Curasao vs Guadalupe #8 Martinique vs Puerto Rico

#9 Honduras vs St. Martin

#10 Aruba vs St Maarten

#11 Guadeloupe vs St Kitts

#12 Antigua B. St. Vincent

#14 Curacao vs St Martin #15 Bahamas vs Bermuda

#16 Jamaica vs St. Lucia

#19 Cayman vs US Islas Virgin

#20 Puerto Rico vs El Salvador

#21 Aruba&vs US&Islas Virgin

#22 Bahamas vs St. Marteen

#17 Martinica vs Haiti #18 Guatemala vs Grenada

#23 Jamaica vs Belice

#24 Guatemala vs St. Lucia

#25 Cayman vs Bermuda

#26 Guadalupe vs St Martin

#27 Haiti vs Antigua Barbuda #28 El Salvador vs Martinique #29 Honduras vs St.Kitts

#30 St. Vincent vs Puerto Rico

#31 St.Marteen vs US Virgen Isl.

#32 Aruba vs Bermda

#33 Grenada vs St.Lucia

#34 St Vincent vs Haiti

#35 Guatemala vs Belice

#36 Cayman vs Bahamas

#37 Curasao vs St.Kitts 6 Nevis

#38 Haiti vs Puerto Rico

#39 El Salvador vs St Vincent

#40 Martinica & Antigua B.

#41 Honduras vs Guadalupe #42 Bahamas vs US Virgin Islands

Juego 43 Grenada vs Belice

#44 Jamaica vs Guatemala

#45 St. Marteen vs Bermuda

#46 Cayman vs Aruba

#47 St. Martin vs St Kitts Nevis

#48 El Salvador vs Haiti

#49 Antigua B. Vs Puerto&Rico

#50 Martinique vs St. Vincent.

#51 Honduras vs Curasao

#52 Bermuda vs Guatemala

#53 Honduras vs El&Salvador

#54 El salvador vs Bermuda(Bronze) 0 1 1 2 2 #55 Guatemala vs Honduras (Gold) 1 1 2 1 1 3 Totales

Promedio

46 57 103 45 88 133 236 0.85 1.06 1.91 0.83 1.63 2.46 4.37

Iv. GENERAL COMMENTS OF MOST SIGNIFICANT ASPECTS Level of the teams participating in the tournament Assessment Summary Table Group (TSG)

Grupo A

Técnica Táctica Ataque Defensa Fisico Calent. Dir. Equip Ev. General

Cayman

4 4 4 3 4 3 4 3.71

Aruba

3 2 4 3 3 3 3 3.00

Bahamas

St. Maarten

1 2 2 1 2 1 2 1.57

US Virgin Islands

Bermuda

3 4 5 4 5 3 4 4.00

Grupo B

2 2

2 1

2 2

1.86 1.71

Técnica Táctica Ataque Defensa Fisico Calent. Dir. Equip Ev. General

Jamaica

3 2 3 3 3 3 3 2.86

Guatemala

4 5 4 5 4 5 4 4.43

Grenada

2 2 2 3 3 3 3 2.57

St. Lucia

2 2 2 2 2 3 3 2.29

Belize

3 4 4 4 4 4 4 3.86

Grupo C

Técnica Táctica Ataque Defensa Fisico Calent. Dir. Equip Ev. General

Honduras

5 4 5 4 5 5 4 4.57

Guadeloupe

4 4 5 3 3 5 3 3.86

St. Kitts

St. Martin

2 2 3 2 2 3 3 2.43

Curacao

3 3 2 2 1 4 4 2.71

Grupo D

3.00

Técnica Táctica Ataque Defensa Fisico Calent. Dir. Equip Ev. General

Antigua & Barbuda

1.14

El Salvador

4.57

Haiti

3 3 3 3 3 4 4 3.29

Martinica

3 3 3 4 4 4 4 3.57

Puerto Rico

4.14

St. Vincent

2.43

VG, G, R, B, VB. From 1 to 5 pts

As it can be seen the performance of the participating teams was very different, and we can classify them into three basic levels. Level A: Honduras, Guatemala, El Salvador, Bermuda, Martinique, Haiti, Cayman Islands, Guadalupe, Puerto Rico and Belize. Level B: Aruba, Jamaica, St. Kitts and Nevis. Level C: Bahamas, Us Virgin Islands, St. Maarten, Granada, St. Lucia, St. Martin, Curacao, Antigua and Barbuda and St. Vincent. TECHNICAL LEVEL “A level teams” showed good technical performance both individually and collectively, always remembering that they are very young players and showed deficiency in shots in near and middle distance as well as ball posession. There were very talented players in full swing development. Remarkable teams were Honduras, El Salvador, Guatemala and Bermuda with a very similar technical - tactical level and operational as in both attack and defense. “B and C level” presented major technical difficulties in fundamental basics such as ball control in different types of facilities, beatings, short passes and long distance, pitch, little possession and serious deficiencies in the definition of the attack with shots on the opposing goal, coordination of movements and making poor decisions. All football basics, which demonstrates the inadequacies since early age. Caribbean countries are the most affected. Impressive is the technical shortcomings of most archers which shows very little and poor job management in this crucial area for a football team. Some teams due to their level were only participants; others due their quality were the genuine players in the event. TACTICAL

Tactical formations most commonly used by the teams were the (1-4-4-2) and (1-4-5-1 With variants (1-4 - 1-3-1) and (1-4-2-3-1) Most Teams of Level A used 2, 3 and 4 players in the offense thanks to the support of lateral leaflets

and defenses in that area, giving amplitude to their games across the width of the field. They also showed organization and discipline in meeting tactical approaches. Remarkable were the teams of Puerto Rico and the Cayman Islands, that without having a great physique, they used a better tactical discipline, presented a dynamic game, sociable, and organized. The organization within the field, the knowledge and tactical discipline were the determining factors in the outcome of the winning teams. Level B teams and C had serious tactics deficiencies and sometimes disorganization and lack of concentration. Both offensive and defensive performance, the lack of ball possession led them, in many cases, to use disorganized long runs with constant balls lost using bad passes. This aspect that is crucial is one of the most significant shortcomings of the Caribbean football. ATTACK It really was a single offensive football tournament, from the 54 games there were only 4 draws. In all matches were scored goals and the final goals figure was 236 for an average of 4.37 goals per game. This is a reflection of an open game thanks to their youth and where there are not so many defensive approaches and there is not restraining of creativity of young football players. Besides there is a very clear reflection of the different levels between the 22 football teams; however young talent could be distinguished as scorers, skillful, fast and eye for goal. Two different forms of attack in the tournament were observed in Central America with an elaborated arrival in midfield, precise combinations and compact game between lines. The Caribbean with direct attacks, counter-attacks and in depth in most of the opportunities. This aspect of football (Offensive Operation) is perhaps the weakest in our region and the most deficient in the Caribbean area due to the low technical level of our players in having possession of the ball, creating fast and safe combinations in attack with dangerous arrivals to the the opposite goal.

DEFENSE The basic system used in defense was four players at the bottom with two or one midfielder forming a compact block in the mid zone. Most of (A) Level teams maintained a stable defensive organization throughout the match with good coverage, anticipations and support from the midline to closing at midfield. The defense players behaved well in the air game and in balls discussion 1 vs 1. Honduras used a labeling intensive presence on the contrary right at loosing the ball, which offered them very positive results. However, it was observed at times lack of mental concentration in defensive zones in the rest of the teams. Level teams (B) and (C) had organizational difficulties and serious defensive concentration. It was impressive the group (C) which showed lack of basic defensive fundamentals and were beaten. We should emphasize that in this category where young players are in their full physical development, in some cases, there are large physical differences decicive in football (strength, height, speed and power) Teams like Bermuda, Guadeloupe, Martinique, Honduras, and Belize had a remarkable physical potential over the rest of the countries. PHYSICAL One of the main objectives of the event was to ensure that all teams should play at least 4 to 7 games, essential aspect for development, and it was achieved. Nevertheless, we must recognize that the physical effort was hard together with the intense heat in the evening hours, which determined the performance in most cases. The fitness levels are similar to the range of the three groups mentioned above. But it is extraordinary in many cases the difference in size, strength, speed and power of some teams above others, in some cases it was decisive in the results achieved. There were teams like Puerto Rico, Cayman Islands, and Haiti, that thanks to their physical and tactical organization gave very good performance against the strongest teams. Level (B) and (C) teams as long as the tournament progressed were declining their physical ability yet to meet tactical tasks; example of this were St. Maarten, Bahamas, U.S. Virgin Island, Curacao, and

St. Lucia. Some others from group B due to its tactic disorganization in the attack and defense were physically tire and reached the second time without a high physical response to the rigor of the game. WARMING UP A Fundamental aspect before any physical activity and in the case of football it is decisive. Some teams had serious difficulties to run in a professional and pedagogical way their warming up. “A level teams” made their warming up with different characteristics and intensity but at least with a basic organization. “B and C Level teams” were poor in most cases; some of them did not have a planned and guided program, unmarked, had no resources to accomplish the warming up, and had no intensive increasing rate. A Poor and deficient aspect; except for the Central American teams, was the lack of warming up for the alternate players that were supposed to enter when changes were needed. It was observed that the archers warming up, in several cases, was carried out alone by themselves without any guidance. TEAM DIRECTION In this area we observed different practices of management and procedure of technical groups among the teams of Central America and the Caribbean, which was really significant, as it is a crucial activity in football. Central American teams remarkable aspects: Correct use of warming with an excellent distribution of its staff in this role, as well as for the Goalkeeper warming, for the main players conditioning and the warming for the alternate players. Regardless of the category of sub 15 team or any other team, the direction is carry out very professionally and it is something valuable to pass on to the Caribbean countries as well as the direction of their teams in the game and the precise tactical instructions, stimulating the players to create and develop their strengths. The tactical approaches and game systems studied and trained giving priority to the team organization in the field. We must say that together with Honduras, Guatemala, El Salvador and, Belize, it was joined Puerto Rico. These teams were examples of

preserved direction throughout the event. As for the Caribbean also Bermuda and Cayman Islands were good examples. The remaining Caribbean teams had limitations on this fundamental issue because of the lack of personality, professionalism and intelligence to organize, plan and anticipate every situation to keep a stable organization in the tournament. Comments on actual play time: The officially played games were of 70 minutes, divided into four sets ( 1 -17.30 , 17.30 - 35, 35 -52.30 , 52.30 -70 ) the lowest part- time was the third with 9.56 min , the fourth part time was the longest one with 11.19 min and the average of the event was 41.36min . Comments on the lineup changes table: We can say that the teams that had the best scores in the tournament made less changes in the leading line-up, exept when ranked in the group stage and it was observed that in the teams with lesser performance and results, made many changes in the initial basic line-up of the players at different positions, affecting the stability and functioning of the team. Observations for the responses about the technical questionnaire. From the 22 participants only 20 teams answered. •19 countries have tournaments in this category. Only Us Virgin Islands states that they have no such event in their country. •Time duration of these tournaments. The range is from 2 to 8 months. Highlighting the countries of Central America where they performed with a longer time.

•The average number of games performed by these players officially in their country is usually between 10-22 encounters in the Caribbean. •Highlighting the Central American countries with 20-40 games.

•Percentages of technical-tactical preparation as average devoted to preparation according to technician’s answers are from 50% to 70%. Even from the less technical-tactical level teams, what makes us ask ourselves: Do these coaches know how to work and achieve their proposed objectives? Do they know how to respond to the questionnaire? However the higher level teams and results in the tournament employed more than 50% of the preparation to that decisive aspect that is the Technical and tactical organization. •Time spent getting teams ready for the tournament ranged between: 1 week minimum to 10 weeks maximum; most of the teams participating worked between 3 to 4 weeks. This shows the weak preparation of the teams in all aspect of several selections. •The competitive reality and tournament results showed that countries: •Honduras, Guatemala, Salvador, Bermuda, Cayman Islands, Puerto Rico, Guadeloupe, Martinique, Haiti, Belize and Aruba, responded and developed a football accordingly to their answers giving priority to technical and tactical work. •The rest of the countries did not comply with the planning and technical concepts in the different encounters as per the responses of their technical staff. •If we wish the development of all CONCACAF countries, then we should prioritize care, control and evaluation of competitive events (schedules) of each federation directly to the number of official games developed in the year.

MĂŠxico

A team with many technical and tactical.limitations. Thi steam participates in group (D) where played in 5 games, with a win and 4 losses; 16 goals against and only 3 in favor. It was noted that all managerial, medical funtions, etc are coach himself developed. A very low warming up level and the direction of the game had no participation nor guidance to the players. It seems there is no internal league at this age to be able to develop better condition. Antigua and Barbuda must work deeply in its internal organization to provide higher-level teams.

Tactical

Basic System of Play 1-4-5-1 a 1-4-4-2

Technical Analysis

Defense Analysis:

•Very little to rescue individually and less on the collective, it is evidenced there is no based work on these boys. •Deficiencies marked on the fundamental basics of football: dribbling, passing, hitting, receptions, etc. •Their goalkeeper showed deficiencies in its technical aspect.

•Their line of defense did not crossed their own midfield; the defense line was apart from the rest of the team. •In the last game not even, the wingers crossed midfield. •They could not maintain a compact game in both attack and defense, leaving large spaces between the lines, allowing easy drive of opposites. They received 16 goals against. •Difficulties in the confrontation and discussion of balls in the 1 vs 1. •Deficient in coverage and anticipations.

Physical Analysis •Very poor physical condition, at that age should emphasize better coordination, flexibility, and based on their internal competition better aerobic conditioning.

Tactic Analysis

• Basic System used was 1-4-4-2 •No changes during the course of the tournament. •Tactic desorganization as well as in attack and defense.

Attack Analysis: •The offensive performance was deficient for not being compact and does not have the support of the backfield lines. •There was no depth and breadth in attack. •Very poor the few offensive combinations. •No possession of the ball.

Deficiencies:

•Very low technical and tactical level of the team. •Defense and attack disorganization. •They failed to develop a compact game between their lines. •There have no mastered basics of football. •Serious instability in the alignments. •No full technical staff in team leadership.

Outstandi ng players.

# 20. Javorn Stevens. Scored three goals and prominent in three games.

# Nombre 1 Dominique LAPIERRE0ARMANDE 22 Kamarni CHARLES

Posición GK GK

2 Terique EDWARDS 3 Terique BENN 4 Donte BENN 5 Rodre HUNTE 6 Matthew HALL 7 Tajah GORDON 8 Johann DERRICK 9 Cristian FERNANDEZ 10 Jawarn LOCKER 11 Kemoi WILLIAMS 13 Ngozie HARVEY 12 Daryl SETH 16 Jelani JARVIS 17 Sheldon CHRISTIAN 20 Javorn STEVENS 15 Jawandi JACOBS

DF\MF DF DF DF MF DF\MF DF\MF FW MF DF FW MF MF MF FW MF

G.Anot. 3 X Treal Juego: 0m45m45 G. Permit. 16 Dif. G -13

TJ GA TjA TjR M NA D RQ 104 0 0 0 0 1 0 -40.1 248 0 0 0 0 0 0 -74.6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 350 0 1 0 0 0 0 40.0 329 0 1 0 0 0 0 37.0 341 0 1 0 0 0 0 38.7 350 0 1 0 0 0 1 55.0 286 0 2 1 0 0 0 0.9 60 0 0 0 0 1 0 3.6 56 0 0 0 0 1 0 3.0 326 0 0 0 0 0 1 61.6 330 0 0 0 0 0 0 47.1 254 0 0 0 0 1 0 31.3 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 3.4 108 0 0 0 0 1 0 10.4 179 0 0 0 0 0 0 25.6 80 0 0 0 0 0 0 11.4 350 3 0 0 1 0 2 165.0 63 0 0 0 0 1 0 4.0 3838 3 6 1 1 6 4

This team finished in the third position of Group A, achieving 3 wins and two defeats and had a good offensive level of 23 goals, most of them made by direct attacks. Their top scorer No. 9 Jean-Pierre Van Der Linden marked 10; he was by far the most remarkable player of the team. Pretty limited in defense, essentially seen due to the disorganization within the field, and the lack of knowlwdge of basiscs defensive principles. Lack of organization in the direction of the tasks within the coaching staff, the alternate players barely come into warming just before entering the field. Need Aruba to strengthen tactical technical work if it is to achieve success in the future. Colorful was provided in the event with his offensive game and competitive desire.

Tactical

Basic System of Play 1-4-3-2-1

Technical Analysis: •This team has certain management of the individual technical fundaments •Marked collective limitations •Lack of resourses to perform effective combinations •Lack of fluid and objective combinations againt the rivals

scheme although some players moved repeatedly position. •Very disorganized in the midfield in both facets of the game, mainly in defense.

Defense Analysis:

•It´s a low - middle height team •Noticeable differences among the players regarding speed, strength and reistence, plus exigence •Facing Bermuda it was observed the physics difference and defficiencies

•Line 4 in the background that was positioned in the field according to the quality of the opponent, but with very little order. •His punts lacked of guidance and in many cases became bad passes. •Deficiencies in the air game due to their short stature. •They were vulnerable when speeding their lines and left many meters behind. Deficient in 1 vs 1. •Their lack flourished when faced rivals of equal or greater quality such as Bermuda, Cayman Islands.

Tactical Analysis:

Attack Analysis:

•Initial system based on a 1-4-2-3-1 formation, which sometimes becomes 1-4-3-3 in attack. •Few variants in the actions of attack and defense. •The amendments did not change the tactical

•Disorganized Attacks mainly those direct ones, taking the advantage of space to the back of the opponent. •Lack of support in the attack, which often comes

Physical Analysis:

with very few players to the area of the contrary. •With very little they made 23 goals, more for the shortcomings of some of his rivals than for their proposal to attack. •Counted their ranks with a deadly attacker (No. 9) who scored 10 goals. •The counter attack was their most effective weapon. •Demonstrated a cheerful game with a clear offensive in front of rivals of their physical level.

warming. •Physical difference with the strongest teams in their group. Bermuda and Cayman Island. Outstanding players: Nro. 9 Jean-Pierre Van Der Linden: Great scorer, fast and tenacious attack in front of a team that created little but he defined everything, scored 10 goals.

Deficiencies: •Serious limitations with the rivlas air game. •Little incorporating of defense lateral attack. •Coordination between central and side to watch their back and alternate each other. •Do not maintain a rational order of their offensive and defensive structure, which makes them vulnerable in these aspects. •Organization of the technical staff primarily in the ARUBA PERFORMANCE SUMMARY TABLE.

# Nombre 1 Bryan ERASMUS 22 Marvin IRAUSQUIN 2 Christopher LEUNG 3 Felix ABREU 4 Renny WERLEMAN 5 Adrian KOOLMAN 6 Jason FONTALVO 7 Hakeem CHARLES 8 John CICILIA 9 JeanHPierre VAN&DER LINDEN 10 Denrick LOPEZ 11 Oscar GARCIA ARIAS 12 Ryan ILLES 13 Ethan CALISTER 14 Christopher JANSEN 15 Diqion RAS 16 Jamir ARENDS 17 Keano MADURO

Posición GK GK DF\MF DF DF DF\MF MF MF MF FW MF MF DF DF FW MDF DF FW

TJ GA TjA TjR M NA D RQ 316 0 0 0 0 0 1 -9.9 34 0 0 0 0 0 0 -4.9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 311 1 0 0 0 0 0 64.4 223 0 1 0 0 0 0 21.9 350 0 0 1 0 0 0 30.0 166 0 0 0 0 0 0 23.7 316 1 0 0 0 0 1 80.1 271 1 0 0 0 0 2 88.7 344 0 0 0 0 0 0 49.1 329 10 1 0 2 0 4 347.0 241 3 0 0 1 0 1 134.4 201 2 0 0 0 0 1 83.7 253 3 1 0 0 1 1 96.1 142 1 1 0 0 1 1 40.3 174 1 0 0 0 1 0 39.9 46 0 0 0 0 0 0 6.6 104 0 0 0 0 1 0 9.9 29 0 0 0 0 0 0 4.1 3850 23 4 1 3 4 12

Ranked fourth of group A, only beating the weak casts of Virgin Islands and St. Maarten, which did not surpassed the draw, their score was 4 points, scoring 11 goals and conceding 10. They lacked the fundamentals basic of game and need to organize their performance at all levels if they are to reach the advanced level of the teams in the area. There were deficiencies in all the basics of football in both attack and defense.

Tactical

Basic System of Play 1-4-3-2-1

Technical Analysis: •Their home stop was 4-4-1-1 •Tactical Disorder, players change position during the development of the games. •Indiscriminately play in several positions. •Changing from alignments, finally it shows clearly that the technician could never define a starting lineup.

Physical Analysis. •Lack of physical fitness. •Some rivals superseded them in this respect. •Slow and lack of coordination in their actions.

Tactical Analysis: •Their home stop was 4-4-1-1 •Tactical Disorder, players change position during the development of the games. •Indiscriminately play in several positions. •Changing from alignments, finally it shows clearly

that the technician could never define a starting lineup.

Defense Analysis: •Line 4 players with five more in midfield very messy and with many shortcomings. •Fool on the mark and 1 vs 1. •The best defense, their goalkeeper played libero for most of their matches. •They have no idea of the defensive principles. •Very separate lines to defend providing all facilities at hand to the rivals.

Attack Analysis: •Their attack is based on individual plays without clear ideas. •It is complicated for them to play together and attack in isolation and disorganized. •Long passes to a lone striker who was lost in the attack line. •Very escazas created scoring opportunities except

for his match with St. Maarten.

Deficiencies:

•Very low technical level in the fundamentals of football. •Low physical. Which symbolizes poor preparation for this event. •No master of the basics principles of the game. •Reinforcement of technical work and organization. Outstanding players:#. 10 Denrick LópezMaximum scorer with three goals and with certain technical skills. Forwarder. Bahamas performance summary table

# Nombre 1 John BOSTWICK 12 Ari BRATHWAITE

Posición GK GK

2 Christopher GODET 3 Keegan BISCHOF 4 Antonio HANNA 5 Oliver D'AGUILAR 6 Ethan WILLIE 7 Terry Joseph MOSKO 8 Matthew RICHARDSON 9 Omri WILLIAMS 10 Phieron WILSON 11 Re'John ENE 13 Danial SHAHIDI 14 Jonathan MILLER 15 Keshawn EDWARDS 18 Nicholas PLAKARIS 19 Chad RUSSELL 20 Justin BLAKE

DF MF FW DF DF\MF FW DF FW DF MF MF MF DF FW MF MF

TJ GA TjA TjR M NA D RQ 315 0 0 0 0 0 1 -40.0 70 0 1 0 0 1 0 -5.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 350 0 0 0 0 0 0 50.0 221 1 0 0 0 1 0 46.6 161 0 0 0 0 1 0 18.0 280 0 0 0 0 0 0 40.0 287 2 0 0 0 0 0 81.0 276 1 0 0 0 0 1 74.4 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.6 251 2 0 0 0 0 0 75.9 255 0 0 0 0 0 0 36.4 203 3 1 0 0 0 0 79.0 35 0 0 0 0 1 0 0.0 284 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 245 1 2 0 0 1 0 30.0 128 1 0 0 1 1 1 73.3 259 0 0 0 0 0 0 37.0 160 0 1 0 0 0 0 12.9 3791 11 5 0 1 6 3

MĂŠxico

National team sub 15, UNCAF member and one of the countries that refreshingly surprised due to their playing level, physical ability and will to win. Belize again shows signs of working well with their national teams and that they can change their competitive image at international events. Included in-group (B) and was featured in all their games regardless of winning or losing. Participated in four games scoring 10 goals and only allowing two. Demonstrating a fierce and strength defensive line. Team on a competitive personality and impetus for victory. They count with a good technical and tactical direction.

Tactical

Basic System of Play 1-4-3-2-1

Technical Analysis.

Tactical Analysis

•Players of good individual technique with good ball control, even under pressure. •Good skills in some players but need to improve their shots on goal. Good short passes, but deficiencies in the long pass. •Good technical level in pitching to the opposing air game.

•Basic system 1-4-4-1-1 formation in defense, always marking individually the two rival´s pointers with two defenders and the others supporting the midfield. •The game is completely with direct attacks and counterattacks in depth thanks to the speed of their two strikers. •They change quickly their tactic formation in attack to a 1-4-3-3 formation when they have possession, coming up with good support for the lone striker. •Combinations in the defense to then go out with deep passes to attack. •Two players very fast in attack the # 19 and # 9 created permanent danger to the attack. Also, for their defense work of pressure, did not allowed opposing defenses play easily? •Presented a good team direction.

Physical Analysis. •Physical fitness and good speed that allows them to recover quickly after errors. Perform deep attacks based on the speed of their forwards. •Their physical ability allowed compactly pressure to the opposing teams throughout the game. •Their physical ability and strength allowed them to be featured in every game. Making proper use of these potentials in balls discussions and dynamic play.

Defense Analysis.

Deficiencies

•Very compact in defense. They use a two markers forming with sweeper system of all Belize´s teams. This allowed them to rivals without tactical variants (Jamaica) neutralize their attackers. •They made a great demonstration of physical ability from the defensive functions, as the strikers after losing the ball as the rest of the lines. •The central defenders showed weakeness in 1vs1 stuations and were vulnerable facing stoped ball and corner kicks situations. •Only allowed two goals in the tournament.

•A lot of bad passes in long runs from defense. •Deficient combinations to attack by making bad decisions in combinations. •The defenses showed weakness in 1vs1 situations giving advantages in the mark of contrary pointers. •Presented difficulties in the passing game of opposites in discussions of head balls.

Attack Analysis. •They use the breadth of the field effectively with good mobility of midfielders and strikers. •Attack system with direct long outings and counterattacks in depth thanks to the excellent speed of their two strikers # 19 and # 9. Very workers in defense as in attack. •Due to this constant game long passes, have many ball lost by deficient long passes.

# Nombre 1 Wayne CADLE 27 Shevon Shamar Butenschoen

Posición GK GK

6 Jamir ALPUCHE 19 Randy AUGUSTINE 10 Rogi SOLORZANO 3 Sammy SOSA 13 Dale PELAYO 8 Karl HAYLOCK 11 Marlom GARCIA 5 Trey HARRIS 23 Kowat NICHOLAS 14 Rene LESLIE 12 Mark Samuels 9 Alvin SIFONTES 16 Charles James 7 Brandon CANTE 18 Dylan RYHS 21 Elton GORDON

DF\MF FW MF DF DF DF MF DF DF MF FW FW MF MF MF FW

Outstanding players. # 9. Alvin Sifontes. Forward. Very fast and dangerous. Scorer with 3 goals. # 19.Randy Augustine. Forward. Very fast and dangerous. Born leader. # 10. Rogi Solórzano.Central halfback. Intelligent and clever. Organizer. # 3. Sammy Sosa. Central fullback. Strong and safe.

TJ GA TjA TjR M NA D RQ 279 0 0 0 0 0 0 19.9 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 263 0 0 0 0 0 0 37.6 282 4 0 0 2 0 4 230.3 280 0 0 0 0 0 3 85.0 263 0 0 0 0 0 1 52.6 280 0 1 0 0 0 0 30.0 192 0 0 0 0 0 0 27.4 278 0 1 0 0 0 1 44.7 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.1 97 0 0 0 0 0 0 13.9 178 1 0 0 0 0 1 60.4 135 2 0 0 0 1 0 54.3 280 3 1 0 1 0 3 160.0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.3 280 0 0 0 0 0 0 40.0 14 0 0 0 0 0 1 17.0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.4 3115 10 3 0 3 1 14

They were the undisputed leader in group A, reaching 15 points in dispute which made the difference specially by its excellent physical condition in addition to some very interesting players, scored 20 goals in the group stage and only received one against. It should be noted that despite playing to the limit in each of the shares was the fewest booked team in the event, demonstrating the fair game that they displayed. Their shortcomings lies in the organization into the field, constantly switched alignments and approaches that reduced the performance of some players. Planning ahead of alternates to enter the game was insufficient, virtually went out of the bank to the ground. It's a talented cast thet well managed can achieve success in the future. In the semifinal match against Guatemala fell in a close game that ended in a draw in the reglamentary time (1-1) and then lost in penalty (4-2). In discussing the third place, fell against Salvador 2 goals to 0. It was the team that showed more fair play in the tournament by winning the Fair play award of the tournament. They showed great spirit and competitive desire and promise to be a great future in the Caribbean football.

Tactical

Basic System of Play 1-4-3-2-1

Technical Analysis:

Tactical Analysis:

•Individual and collective technic acceptable, dominate the basics of the game. •They use a lot passes and combinations in short and have very talented and creative players (# 20, # 5, # 15, and # 6). •It is not a flashy team but handles great its resources. •Carries out a high speed moves but sometimes lack accuracy in combining quick passes. •Have players with good dribbling skills. •Low technical level in shots on goal.

•Initial basic 1-4-3-3 system •Maybe it was the team that implemented more changes since its formation varied 1-3-4-3 and 1-44-2 in occasions. •They based their game on a high ball possession in midfield maximizing the opponent's weaknesses. Good technical level in this area. •Have difficulties when the opposing defense does not give many spaces behind them. •Try to go out playing short from behind, with variants of deep attacks in speed thanks to this feature of their forwards.

Physical Analysis: •It is the most remarkable aspect of the team, players who impose their physical condition. •Powerful and very fast, almost win every ball, divided into shock and race, which makes them very strong in the 1vs 1.

Defense Analysis: •Raised a zone defense with main line of resistance ahead pressing the rival in their field. •Strong in the air game and play to the limit in the 1vs1 imposing their physical condition. •When the opponent attack from outside they easily lost the mark in the center as in the stoped ball plays. •Most often used personal branding addressed to rival most dangerous player in attack using for it to player # 7 in this specific function.

Attack Analysis: •They use many combinative attacks and have very creative and vertical players in midfield, its player # 20 has a lot of game vision. •They scored goals from all distances with highlights for # 15 and 6 which scored 4 goals each. •The side fullback players are often incorporated to attack, highlighted was # 6 on the left touchline. •Occasionally they use direct attacks exploiting the great power of their forwards, highlighted was # 15. •They are very dangerous in the 1 vs 1, imposing above all his athletic conditions. •They handle well the counter-attack, getting out with speed and power, with emphasis on its # 10, 5, and 15.

Deficiencies:

•The team is not compact in attacks, it is divided into 2 groups with many spaces in the midfield. •The alternate players are not properly prepared to provide the replacements. Outstanding players: •Their best players were: # 20, # 5, # 6 and # 15 #. 20 Osagi Bascome: Technically excellent, creative and with great game vision, and team organizer. #. 5 Amar Lewis: A marvel physical with acceptable ball skills and impressive in the 1 vs. 1. halfback. #. 6 Oneko Lowe:Quick and handy, with a powerful mid range shot who played as an outside forward and left halfback , scored 4 goals. #. 15 Jai-Zel Smith-Deshields: Forward, great finisher fast and powerful, scored 4 goals.

•Some players are technically limited, mainly on the defensive line. •A lot of poor definition against arch rival, they created many oportunuties but lost them mostly.

# Nombre 1 Yana SMITH-DAVIS

Posición GK

2 Ahria SIMONS 3 Jordan LAMBE 4 Travis BOYLES 5 Amar LEWIS 6 Oneko LOWE 7 Vance WALL BROWN 8 SYMONDS Jason 9 Judah CHAPMAN 10 Jacob GREENE 11 Aaron BURGESS 14 Quinn OUTERBRIDGE 15 Jai-Zel SMITH-DESHIELDS 16 Jecoa THOMAS 17 Llineiko MILLETT 18 Justin BELL 19 Knory SCOTT 20 Osagi BASCOME

DF DF DF MF DF DF\MF DF\MF FW DF\MF FW DF FW MF DF DF MF MF

TJ GA TjA TjR M NA D RQ 490 0 0 0 0 0 0 30.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 425 2 1 0 0 0 1 105.7 420 1 0 0 0 0 0 80.0 95 1 0 0 0 1 0 28.6 423 1 0 0 1 0 5 180.4 419 4 1 0 1 0 3 199.9 283 0 0 0 0 1 1 50.4 420 0 0 0 0 0 1 75.0 257 1 0 0 0 1 1 66.7 140 0 0 0 0 1 2 45.0 374 1 0 0 1 1 3 138.4 160 0 1 0 0 1 0 7.9 336 4 0 0 1 0 2 183.4 213 0 0 0 0 1 0 25.4 104 0 0 0 0 0 0 14.9 218 0 0 0 0 0 1 46.1 226 2 0 0 0 0 2 102.3 396 3 0 0 2 0 4 226.6 5399 21 3 0 6 7 26

A worthy host of the tournament, a happy team, united and with a very well defined style of play despite its shortcomings, they were second in the group, yielding only to the power and drive of Bermuda. Its performance consisted on 4 wins and one loss, the only team that having 12 points failed to advance from the group stage, they scored 27 goals (leaders of the tournament) of which nearly 50 percent of their top scorer Leighton Young Thomas Jr. who scored 12, Leader of the contest. The shortages were on the defensive order, which allowed six goals. Cayman Team is on the right track and if they strengthens the work at the lower levels, then they can give pleasant surprises in the future.

Tactical

Basic System of Play 1-4-3-2-1

Technical analysis:

Tactical Analysis:

•Management of the individual basic technical fundaments, need to consolidate the collective ones. •It has very skilled and creative players in handling the ball (# 10, # 7, # 3, and # 11) •The limitations in this aspect comes to light when the main physical opponent pushes hard, then they lose accuracy in combinations.

•Initial system: 1-4-2-3-1 variant: 1-4-4-1-1 •Amendments player by player respecting positions except when # 10 gets out then the right halfback # 7 takes its place. •Game based on a highball possession and very tidy. •They suffer in the defense due to lack of solid variants.

Physical analysis:

Analysis in defense:

•Physically well enough, having fast players and having the ability to manage the demands of the game even though many of them are short. •This aspect can be enhanced to counteract the above-mentioned element. •Against the Bermuda team, the physical difference (strength and height) determined in the adverse outcome.

•They initiated all games with a line of four at the back and two outside halfback that were placed either on the pitch according to the guidance of his coach. •Sometimes the sides overcame them when the outside forwards were incorporated into the attack. •They exerted pressure in the midfield. •They showed some deficiencies in the mark (1 vs 1) •Fasing Bermuda, they were overcome in discussions of balls in this area.

Deficiencies

Attack Analysis:

•They use a very well combinative attacks, carried out with very creative players (# 7, # 10, # 3) combining very well and have possession of the ball. •They frequently incorporate the defenses creating a compact side in attack. •Its vertical attacks with his forward no. 11 gave them good dividends, providing much damage and making a lot of goals, 12 in total, tournament leader. •Step in 4 and 5 players to the opponent attack area. Support on the offense. •They turned goals into balls stopped (corners) •No found alternatives when individual marking against their attack reference was effective.

•Coordination in the defensive cover between central and lateral defenders to back up eack other. •Variants of attacks when opponent preassure. •The alternate players’ warm-up was poor.

# Nombre 1 Matthew James GUITARD 12 Livingston Luke BAILEY 23 Finigan Huffington 2 Kory Micheal MCLEAN 3 Elijah Gregory SEYMOUR 4 Ryan Anthony JACKSON 5 Jordan Jeremiah MCLEAN 6 Leo Isiah EBANKS 7 Ramon Sebastian MARTINEZ 8 Cameron Jason GRAY 9 Kray Allan FOSTER 10 Zachary Ismael SCOTT 11 Leighton Young THOMAS JR 13 Stephen Christopher RIVERS 14 Alexander Kameron D HUE 15 Joshua Anthony MCKENZIE 17 Dante Michael RAMOON 18 Ezra Jeremiah REDDEN 19 Kieran Alexander HINDESS 16 Michael Cruz

TJ GA TjA TjR M NA D RQ 182 0 0 0 0 0 0 -4.0 98 0 0 0 0 1 0 -1.0 70 0 0 0 0 1 0 -15.0 272 0 0 0 0 1 0 33.9 166 1 0 0 0 1 1 53.7 350 2 0 0 0 0 1 105.0 35 1 0 0 0 0 0 25.0 72 0 0 0 0 0 0 10.3 310 3 0 0 0 0 4 164.3 319 2 0 0 0 0 1 100.6 133 1 1 0 0 0 1 44.0 332 2 0 0 1 0 2 142.4 303 11 0 0 2 0 3 358.3 281 0 0 0 0 0 0 40.1 350 0 1 0 0 0 0 40.0 53 2 0 0 0 0 0 47.6 304 1 1 0 0 0 0 53.4 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.3 39 0 0 0 0 0 0 5.6 106 1 1 0 0 1 0 20.1 3777 27 4 0 3 5 13

Posición GK GK GK DF DF\MF MF DF\MF DF MF MF MF FW FW DF DF FW DF FW FW FW

Jugadores destacados: # 11, #7, # 10. #. 7 Ramón Sebastián Martínez: A little one with an excellent technical level, creative and with great game vision, halfback. #. 10 Zachary Ismael Scott: Great ball handling, creative and score passer. Organizer and intelligent attacking. #. 11 Leighton Young Thomas Jr. - A predator in the area, scored 12, Leader, highly mobile and despite his gifts was generous with his teammates giving several assistance.

The Curacao selection presented the youngest team in the event and the lowest physical constitution. Participated in-group C, falling against strong teams in all presentations. Receiving 19 goals against and only 3 in favor. This event was for the young team of Curacao a competitive experience that we believe, in the future, will bring good results. Should be established for upcoming events minimum age limit, because it is dangerous at this age, the physical difference between players and teams.

Tactical

Basic System of Play 1-4-3-2-1

Technical Analysis:

Tactical Analysis:

•Very well, technically and always try to play. •The goalkeeper starts playing from behind. •They come together trying to play 1 and 2 touches. •They are young children in height and age but daring in wanting and asking for the ball.

•Basic Approach 1-4-5-1. They try to group players in midfield. •Always tried to start playing from defense with ball dominated. •This very young team brought as fundamental objective to participate in the event and provide their young athlets competitive experience. •Regardless of the score, they always tried to play with possession of the ball and well organized. •Their notable physical difference with the rest of the teams determined their results.

Physical Analysis: •Short players. They lost all the balls in plays for balls discussion. •Physically regular, a lot to improve in height and muscle mass. •Not able to maintain a high pace of game throughout the tournament.

Defense Analysis:

Attack Analysis:

•When they lost the ball, the entire team retreated to midfield, trying to shrink the spaces. •Disorganized defense and spaces at the backs of their outside forwards were large so they were attacked right there. •The team did not play compact, splitting in the midfield. •Weak in the discussion of balls 1 vs 1 and head balls. •The physical strength of opponents determined on results.

•Little passed midfield and rarely reached the rival area. •It was the shortest team event in age and height and it seemed that the dimensions of the field were too large for them.

Deficiencies: •Age and physical condition of the players as well as size not accordingly to the tournament. •Physically weak to face national teams that are really sub 15. •No technical or tactical level accordingly to this category. Outstanding players:No player found.

# Nombre Posición 1 Bryan Alejandro LACROES& GK 22 William Dylan Christopher Leonard P. GK 8 Georgino ASCENCION 16 Jordan Ludwig IPCEDENCIA 10 Jhair Gregorie EVERS 3 Naisier Antoine GUANIPA 7 Mygyrelly WIFRED 6 Naigel VALORIAN 4 Jesuel Timothy LANOY 14 Dean Lynford Anthony LOURENSZ 9 Rogyaer Freandyon MICHIEL 13 Quintley Abisai OGENIA 5 Abner Kin-Wah PANG 2 Johan Alejandro PETRONILIA 11 Esteban PIERRE 17 Hesus Nicasio PIETERSZ 15 Duane William HERMAN 12 Luis Oscar STEENBAAR

DF MF DF DF\MF DF MF DF\MF

DF DF\MF

TJ GA TjA TjR M NA D RQ 35 0 0 0 0 1 0 -30.0 245 0 1 0 0 0 0 -135.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 176 0 0 0 0 0 0 25.1 245 0 0 0 0 0 1 50.0 174 0 1 0 0 1 1 24.9 138 0 0 0 0 1 0 14.7 140 0 0 1 0 0 0 0.0 280 1 0 0 0 0 0 60.0 162 0 0 0 0 1 0 18.1 259 1 1 0 0 0 3 92.0 121 0 1 0 0 0 1 22.3 136 0 0 0 0 1 0 14.4 70 0 0 0 0 0 0 10.0 210 0 0 0 0 0 0 30.0 7 0 0 0 0 1 0 -4.0 168 0 2 1 0 0 0 -16.0 280 1 2 0 0 0 0 40.0 187 0 0 0 0 0 0 26.7 3033 3 8 2 0 6 6

The selection of Salvador was one of the major players in the tournament. With a lively combinations game and eager of goals. Participated in group D, winning in the qualifying stage, three matches and drawing two. With 8 goals for and 3 against. In the semifinals, they faced the winner of the group C, Honduras, having an emotional and tied meeting with 2 goals to 1. For the discussion of the 3rd place, they defeated Bermuda 2 goals to 0. Thus closing their excellent participation. Very good leadership and very good organization in its work of warming up and in the direction of the game very attentive to corrections. Very compact lines, in the development of the game. Always tried to propose the attack game. Very firm defense in marking and very solid in anticipations. Very mobile midfield and looking forward to permanently enable forwards.

Tactical

Basic System of Play 1-4-3-2-1

Technical Analysis:

Tactical Analysis:

•Very good individual and collective technical ability, manifested in all games involved, except in the last game in the group stage against Haiti who were overcome by the physical pressure of the rival •In semifinal were very applied in his play and managed to handle the ball in a good way. •Good individual and collective technical level.

•System used throughout the tournament was 1-42-3-1 •With some variations in games where the outcome was very favorable, passed to 1-4-1-2-3 •They kept a lot of mobility, depth in attack and defense which allowed them to always be well protected and not to be overcome. •Often used front changes but they were not very effective. •Compact in their lines to attack and in defense. •Very good possession of the ball mainly in midfield.

Physical Analysis: •Very good in most games, kept the same pace and were the most consistent of the group. •In semifinal kept pace against a stronger physically opponent, Bermuda. •Short players but they make it up with speed and physical ability.

Defense Analysis: •Defense zone very strong, always staggered and permanent coverage, always set numerical superiority in many sectors of the field to seek recovery of the ball, safe in the air game. •Good block game, with delay and anticipation when it is not the time. •The halfbacks counted with a shield that was # 5

Juan Jose Martinez. •Very good transition from attack to defense and vice versa.

Attack Analysis: •They centralized their games in attacks, which prevented them from braking defense, and then they used instead mid range shooting. •Effective in the preparation of their short plays in the midfield, but diluted in front of the area where failed in the last pass because of the few spaces. •They were bold, with improvisation that was a positive element in their offensive performance.

# Nombre Posición 1 Pedro Benjamin MEDRANO BENITEZ GK 18 Gerson Yonatan Vasquez GK 2 Kevin Zidane Martinez 3 Kevin Fabrico Urquilla 4 Jorge Luis Najarro 5 Juan Jose Martinez 6 David Salvador Hernandez 7 Henry Javier Turcios 8 Gerardo Hamilcar Molina 9 Manuel De Jesus Amaya 10 Josue Daniel Melendez 11 Moises Alejandro Lopez 13 Rafael Armando Chanas 14 Nestor Yasser Alfaro 15 Carlos Manuel Herrera 16 Samuel Alberto Estrada 17 Rodrigo Jose Moran 12 Emerson Alexis Rodriguez

DF\MF DF DF MF DF MF MF FW MF FW MF MF FW MF DF MF

Deficiencies: •Centralizing the game without taking up much space on the outside, few side arrivals generated because there were no splitting of its outside forwards or halfbacks to seek out depth. •Improve the short shootings on the opposite arch. Jugadores destacados: # 2 Kevin Zidane Martínez. Outside Right Forward. # 5 Juan José Martínez. Halfback. # 8 Gerardo Amílcar Molina. Mixed halfback. # 10 Josué Daniel Meléndez.Arrival halfback. # 9 Manuel de Jesús Amaya. Forward. # 15 Carlos Manuel Herrera. Arrival Halfback.

TJ GA TjA TjR M NA D RQ 211 0 2 0 0 0 1 15.1 246 0 0 0 0 1 0 -19.9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 490 3 1 0 2 0 4 230.0 490 0 0 0 0 0 2 100.0 488 0 1 0 0 0 2 89.7 436 2 1 0 0 0 3 137.3 300 0 1 0 0 0 1 47.9 254 1 0 0 0 0 1 71.3 453 3 1 0 0 0 3 159.7 66 0 0 0 0 0 0 9.4 379 4 0 0 2 0 2 214.1 376 0 0 0 0 0 2 83.7 117 0 0 0 0 1 0 11.7 133 0 1 0 0 1 0 4.0 390 2 0 0 1 1 4 175.7 76 0 0 0 0 0 0 10.9 367 0 0 0 0 1 0 47.4 73 0 0 0 0 1 0 5.4 5345 15 8 0 5 6 25

Granada presented a team with a low tactical and technical level but organized. They took part in a group (B) where the competitive level was high. Loosing 3 games (4-0) against Jamaica (5-0) with Guatemala and (6-1) vs. Belize. Winning only one game against St. Lucia by (2-0). With 15 goals against and 3 in favor, they closed its performance at the event. We must recognize that their presence at the event is a success due to fact that Granada is a country seeking for further development in football. So they really have to work harder and increase the quality in teaching the technical aspects in their youth and children.

Tactical

Basic System of Play 1-4-5-1

Technical Analysis.

Tactical Analysis.

•The individual and collective technical level was low. •Under pressure from the opponents, they did not have ball possession and missed a lot of passes. •Very little combinations in the game and very rarely make stopped the ball three or four times continuous. •Low technical level on goal shots in short and medium distances. •Technical difficulties in pitching to face the opposing air game despite their tall stature.

•Basic training variants 1-4-4-2 and never applied variants regardless of the outcome of the game. •They had good possession of the ball against weak teams in their group. •With the strongest teams, they were not able to keep the combinations and ball possession for long. •Organizational tactics deficiencies and of operation did not allowed them to play compactly both offense and defense, leaving large spaces between lines.

Physical Analysis. •Players rather high for this category. Strong in the 1vs 1. •Low fitness level and show fatigue from 50 minutes in every game. What does not allowed them to maintain an organized and compact game between the different lines.

Defense Analysis: •Defensive disorganization and lack of coverage in all lines for not achieving a compact game. •Deficient in the game 1 vs 1, defensively for been very isolated. •They left many gaps in the midfield. •Vulnerable to balls coming from the touchlines and in balls stopped plays and corners.

Attack Analysis.

Deficiencies.

• Technical deficiencies have prevented ball possession and creating dangerous moves to attack •The attack has as the main approach the game of direct attacks with long runs but due to the low technical level, the vast majority of these passes were bad. •Technical deficiencies in goal shots on short medium distance. •They were not effective on stopped balls plays and corners.

•Disorganization in defensive functioning and attacks. •They failed to play a compact between the different lines leaving significant gaps in midfield. •Poor support of bottom lines in attack and coverages. •Technical deficiencies in the beatings goals in short and medium distances.

# Nombre 1 Reshane HOUSTON 20 Jeremy RICHARDSON

Posición GK GK

2 Delon COLLIN 3 Raheem JULIEN 4 Kendon JOSEPH 5 Randell FLETCHER 6 JahmaiYOUNG 7 Keron CHARLES 8 Javon BARTHOLOMEW 9 Rickell CHARLES 10 Kobe THOMAS 11 Brandon HOOD 13 Kitakufei NELSON 14 Chelon EDGEHILL 15 Earlond MILLETTE 16 Oneil HOSTEN 17 Jehreem AULD 12 Keno ALEXANDER

DF DF DF DF DF DF\MF MF MF FW FW MF DF\MF FW FW MF FW

TJ GA TjA TjR M NA D RQ 246 0 0 0 0 0 0 -114.9 34 0 0 0 0 0 0 4.9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 167 0 0 0 0 1 0 18.9 75 0 0 0 0 0 0 10.7 280 0 1 0 0 0 0 30.0 183 0 1 0 0 0 0 16.1 140 0 0 0 0 0 0 20.0 206 0 0 0 0 0 0 29.4 75 0 0 0 0 0 0 10.7 280 1 0 0 1 0 3 130.0 188 0 0 0 0 0 1 41.9 214 0 0 0 0 0 1 45.6 154 0 0 0 0 1 0 17.0 229 2 0 0 0 1 0 67.7 280 0 0 0 0 0 0 40.0 156 0 0 0 0 1 0 17.3 85 0 0 0 0 1 0 7.1 93 0 0 0 0 1 0 8.3 3085 3 2 0 1 6 5

Jugadores destacados: # 9. Rickell Charles. Forward, skillfull and hardworking.

Guadeloupe team was also one of the stars of the tournament due to its level even failed to qualify for the final encounter, falling into the group (C) against Honduras who eventually was the champion of the event. Guadalupe selection showed good technical â&#x20AC;&#x201C; tactical level, physical and organizational with an accent of European style. They won three games and lost just one against Honduras. Participated in 4 games winning 3 and losing 1. With 13 goals in favor and 4 against. However, we can say that although they have not qualified, they were one of the higher level teams in the event. They offered interesting players due to their individual technical level and conditions for football.

Tactical

Basic System of Play 1-4-4-1-1

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS:

TACTICAL ANALYSIS:

•Very good collective and individual technique mainly with (# 8, # 14, # 11) •They like playing with the ball out from the back. •They try to get to the oponent area with ball control. •Smart archer, very wet field, played long never short •Accurate passes in its one-touch. •Highly skilled players in the 1Vs1. •Good head nod technique on balls in the air.

•Startup key tactical System 1-4-4-1-1 •Team tactically well organized. •Carry out modidifications man by man without changing its initial structure. •They made rotations among players and great mobility, which helped in possession of the ball. •Deficiencies in the technical and tactical team due to the coach, locating very skilled players on offense in defensive positions. Example # 7, from halfback to fullback.

PHYSICAL ANALYSIS:

DEFENSE ANALYSIS:

•Good physical condition, maintained a high tempo throughout the event. •Very tall and fast players. Strong in the discussion of balls in the air and 1vs1.

•Well labored and organized •As soon as losing the ball they make a compact game and reduce the opponent’s spaces. •They pushed on the opposing teams at midfield in a space of 30 meters. •Very Strong in marking. •Handled anticipation and coverages very well. •Good in the air play thanks to their height.

DEFICIENCIES

ATTACK ANALYSIS: •Very good organized attack game. •In midfield, they elaborated plays with good possession of the ball. •They attacked on the touchlines at ease (with # 11) of certain rivals ending in centers or assisting goal passes •Good midrange shot •Right and left halfbacks were deep centers and threw center strikes, and when attacking on the opposite side, they arrived by surprise hurting and scoring goals •They were always fullness in the attack.

# Nombre 1 BICHARA JABOUR Jean 16 TAILLEPIERRE Flavien

Posición GK GK

2 Benjamin LAURENT 3 Grégory MANCHAUD 4 Andrew CHERDIEU 5 Florian OTTO 6 Ludwig FRANCILLETTE 7 Luther ARCHIMEDE 8 Yvann MACON 9 Geordy CHOISI 10 Loïc ANTONIDES 11 Yohan FOGGEA 12 Heindrix HEBREU 13 Wyllan ADELAIDE 14 Lory CHOUAN 15 Raphael RENIA 17 Sylguy Fumont 18 Benoit Gedeon

DF DF\MF DF\MF DF FW MF MF FW FW MF DF DF DF\MF FW FW MF

•Their central fullbacks were very fearful and insecure with the ball. •The side fullbacks were very enigmatic to attack. Little offensive support. •Fail many passes in the attack combinations. Jugadores destacados: # 8. Yvan Macon. Halfback. Organizer and very intelligent. • # 14. Lory Chouan. Halfback. Very clever. • # 10. Loic Antonides. Forward. Scorer. • # 9. Geordy Choisi. Forward. Scorer. • # 1. Jean Bichara. Goalkeeper. Very good catches and team management.

TJ GA TjA TjR M NA D RQ 210 0 0 0 0 1 1 0.0 70 0 0 0 0 0 0 10.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 280 0 0 0 0 0 0 40.0 160 0 0 0 0 1 1 32.9 143 0 0 0 0 1 1 30.4 280 0 0 0 0 0 0 40.0 174 2 0 0 0 0 0 64.9 149 2 0 0 0 0 0 61.3 264 0 0 0 1 0 2 92.7 145 3 0 0 0 0 1 95.7 264 3 1 0 1 0 3 157.7 159 0 0 0 0 0 0 22.7 134 1 0 0 0 0 1 54.1 175 0 0 0 0 0 0 25.0 259 1 0 0 1 0 3 127.0 119 0 0 0 0 1 0 12.0 107 0 0 0 0 1 0 10.3 57 1 0 0 0 0 0 28.1 3149 13 1 0 3 5 13

A representative country of the Central American region, they brought a great team to this event. As the game was developed, their competitive level was growing. Very good technical, tactical, physical and performance level, with the familiar style of play in Central America of ball possession and exits from the bottom. Participated in six games with 14 goals scored and only 4 against. They discussed the gold medal against Honduras in a thrilling encounter where they fell very tightly (2 goals to 1) after providing an excellent demonstration of football and will to win. They gave color to the tournament, leaving a pleasant taste of a new Guatemalan football reappearance in the international arena.

Tactical

Basic System of Play 1-4-1-3-2

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS •Good technical level individually and collectively. •Good organization in defense and attack and keep ball possession, otherwise even under pressure and in a confined space. •Slow construction attack from behind, but capable of rapid movements of counterattacks through good combinations with long and short passes. •Good shots on goal in the area but have difficulties hitting middle and long distance. •A technical and tactical level very evenly among all players that despite his young age know how to develop an excellent team play.

TACTICAL ANALYSIS •Uses a line up of 1-4-1-3-1-1 at the start of their games, but these changes during the game to a 1-41-3-2 formation to include an extra attacker. •A system based on the slow building attack from behind using combinations and being compacted with the support of both midfielders and defensive lines during the attack.

•The forwards are their first line of defense and try to recover the ball immediately and press the contrary in its own ground. •Very good management team organized and planned with tactical and operational requirements. Very good substitutes changes during the game.

ATTACK ANALYSIS. •Their offensive strategy depends on a high technical level and possession of the ball, which allow them to have organize attacks with slow and fast counterattacks surprise when necessary. They quickly pass from defense to attack. •Good mobility and job rotation during the attack, allowing them to remain compact, both in depth and in breadth. •They were not effective on set and corners.

DEFENSE ANALYSIS

DEFICIENCIES.

•Use a line up that forces the opponent to play on the touchlines, as there is little space in the middle and allows them to be compact when defending. •This compact defense kept the pressure on the opponent throughout the match and allows them to retrieve the ball quickly. •Due to their average stature, they fase some difficulties in the air play, on corners and centers of opposites. •Very good in coverage and anticipations. In higherlevel matches, semifinals and finals, they showed a great competitive character and desire for victory. •Very good archer, with direction and excellent saves.

•Too many spaces on the touchlines when they integrated to the attacks. •Difficulties in the air play due to their height at the time of discussing balls, in corners and centers of opposites. •Technical limitations in the beatings of goal in short and mid distances.

PHYSICAL ANALYSIS •Good physical condition that allows them to put pressure on the opponents through the games. •They kept mainly in the two final matches high tempo and intensity. # Nombre 1 REZNIK B. Rodrigo'Dimitri 12 Roberto'Carlos'PINEDA'FRANCO

Posición GK GK

2 Jose Rigoberto ALVARADO CAC DF 3 Julio RodrigoLOPEZ MORALES DF\MF 4 Johan MORALES CAMPOS DF 5 Mario Humberto RODAS RAMIREZ DF\MF 6 Melgar Stefan BEHRENS DF\MF 7 Alvaro Josue VELASQUEZ HERNANDEZ MF 8 Gerson Danilo CAAL PIZZA MF 9 Francisco SPROSS CIFUENTES FM 10 John Roberth MENDEZ SANCHEZ MF 11 Diego Fernando RAYMUNDO LIMA MF 13 Jose Raul LOPEZ MARTINEZ MF 14 Jeferson Andersson DUBON LOARCA MF 15 Ricardo Antonio COBAR SUSBIELLES DF 16 Victor Manuel VALDEZ YANES DF 17 Armando Anibal AROCHE'LUCERO FW 18 Esteban Gabriel GARCIA VELAZQUEZ FW

Outstanding players. # 1. Rodrigo Dimitri. Goalkeeper. The highlight of the event. Safe and effective. # 3. Julio Rodrigo López. Outside Forward. Very good technical level. # 5. Mario Humberto Rodas. Central Fullback. Secure and technical. # 7. Álvaro Josué. Outside Forward. Fast and skilful. # 9. Francisco Spross. Forward. Scorer. Skillfull and timely. #18. Esteban Gabriel. Forward. Scorer. Very dangerous. TJ GA TjA TjR M NA D RQ 406 0 1 0 0 0 2 38.0 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 314 0 0 0 0 0 0 44.9 271 0 0 0 0 0 2 68.7 366 0 0 0 0 0 0 52.3 420 1 0 0 0 0 3 125.0 420 0 1 0 0 0 1 65.0 327 1 2 0 0 0 3 91.7 50 0 0 0 0 0 0 7.1 396 6 0 0 2 0 5 301.6 136 0 1 0 0 0 1 24.4 402 1 0 0 0 0 2 107.4 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.6 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.0 106 0 1 0 0 1 0 0.1 334 0 0 0 0 1 0 42.7 214 0 0 0 0 1 0 25.6 410 5 0 0 3 0 4 293.6 4618 14 6 0 5 3 23

The Haitian team participated in the group (D) giving color and quality to the event with their performance and cheerful offensive game. As the tournament progressed, the team was growing in performance and at the end of their performance; we must recognize that they play the lead. Participated in five meetings with 3 wins (5-1) against Antigua and Barbuda, (2-0) with San Vicente and (1-0) against Puerto Rico. Even at (1-1) against the strong team of Salvador. Its only loss was (0-4) in the opening match against Martinique. A team that was developing positively in the course of the tournament, they started loosing, providing not a good feeling, but finished as leaders in the group. Good management and its warming up well organized.

Tactical

Basic System of Play 1-4-2-3-1

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS:

TACTICAL ANALYSIS:

•They were getting better individually and collectively, very verticality in their passes. •The development of short plays were very effective with skillful players in short space under opponent’s pressure. •Showed very skilled players in the dribbling and drivings. •Good individual and collective technical level. •Technical difficulties in the shots on goal in short and medium distances.

•Its system in the tournament was 1-4-2-3-1, without changes in the rest of the tournament. •Its center forwarder managed high mobility in the center of the attack with the support of left end by overflowing to diagonal to meet the leading player. •They performed many changes in the attack front due to mobility and job rotation of players. •They grouped many players in midfield and had an excellent ball possession. •Sometimes they remain with three fullbacks because the outside forwards supported the attack giving great breadth in the midfield.

PHYSICAL ANALYSIS: • Very good physical conditions, they were showing improvement with the progress of the tournament. •Rapid player’s implementation of actions and with great speed. •They maintained good actions rhythem in its final matches.

DEFENSE ANALYSIS: •They started the tournament poorly on defense, they were easily overcome in the 1vs1, but they very well corrected in the following games and provided much credit at the back, showed well in coverage and anticipations due to its speed. •Their defensive line was very compact as well as in

the midfield. •They established pressure in the center of the field. •Good transition from attack to defense and vice versa.

ATTACK ANALYSIS: •Always sought to play on the sides as its main attack element with a midfield that supplied many balls to its offensive sector, its center forward very skillfull and strong to hold the ball. •They established a lot of depth, improvisation and rotations mobility with strong support posts and outside fullback.

# Nombre 1 Etienne MICHELSON 12 Emmanuel CHERY

Posición GK GK

2 Thermidor FILS AIME 3 Jhon Peter CHARLES 4 Michener ELMIDOR 5 Didley DESIR 6 Schneider GAY 7 Peguy JOSEPH 8 Cedrick SAINT-JOY 9 Tchekvoh-Kevin-Bonel AMEDE 10 Jhonson JEUDY 11 Pierre DENILSON 20 Angelo THELUSME 13 Shelove ACHELUS 15 Looby PIERRE LOUIS& 16 Samuel JEUNE 18 Denso ULLYSSE

MF DF DF DF MF FW MF FW MF DF DF\MF MF DF FW DF

DEFICIENCIES: •Their airplay game can be improved as well as its physical consistency and the rhythm. •With physical work coordination, agility and flexibility. •They must improve shot at goal at short and medium distances. Outstanding players: # 2 Thermidor Fils Aimé. # 6 Schneider Gay. # 8 Cedrick Saint Joy. # 9 Tchekvoh Kevin Bonel. #13 Schelove Achelus. # 10 Johnson Jeudy

TJ GA TjA TjR M NA D RQ 149 0 0 0 0 1 0 -3.7 201 0 0 0 0 0 0 -11.3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 350 2 1 0 1 0 4 165.0 259 0 1 0 0 0 0 27.0 33 0 0 0 0 0 0 4.7 49 0 0 0 0 1 0 2.0 302 0 1 0 0 0 2 63.1 218 2 0 0 0 1 0 66.1 204 0 0 0 0 1 1 39.1 350 1 1 0 1 0 4 145.0 350 2 0 0 1 0 1 130.0 317 0 0 0 0 1 0 40.3 246 2 0 0 0 1 0 70.1 239 0 1 0 0 0 4 84.1 57 0 0 0 0 0 0 8.1 110 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.7 350 0 0 0 0 0 2 80.0 3784 9 5 0 3 6 18

Honduras played in the group (C) composed of five teams and it was the best ever. It is very structured organization from the warming up allowed them to win 4 games in the qualifying stage. It is rigorous tactical organization anabled easy games and allowed 18 goals and none against in the standings. The tactical level, technical and physical preparation of all the player allowed the coach to make changes man by man without breaking its initial structure and raise the pace of play in the end of each game. The Central American soccer style makes the difference with the Caribbean teams highlighting the strengths of its organization as individual and collective performance. In the semifinal phase, the strong team of El Salvador was defeated (2-1) and in the final Honduras again defeted the Guatemala team with the same result. In a great meeting where again displayed their ability to play football colorful. They noted throughout the event 22 goals and received only two against. Very good and professional team leadership by its technical group.

Tactical

Basic System of Play 1-4-2-3-1

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS:

TACTICAL ANALYSIS:

•Technically good individually and collectively. •Very fast in leading. •They are skilled in handling the ball. •Good possession of the ball and making plays from the defense. •Good technical level of team with players like (# 5, # 10, # 18, # 7) above the team average. •Good quality of short passes and long passes. •Good head games of the midfielders.

•The team has an initial and final approach 1-4 2 - 3 -1 in attack and defense as preserved for the changes that were man by man •Good tactical organization of a system well- known by the players. •The team can play a counter attack and use a prepared and organized attack combinations and arrivals to goal. •They take a lot of advantage out of the ball sttopped. •Good organization in corners: each player knows what to do.

PHYSICAL ANALYSIS: •Players extremely fast and powerful. •Very tall players. •Much of tone and coordination. •Able to maintain a good physical effort intensity throughout the game.

DEFENSE ANALYSIS: •Very well organized and compact the defensive from the forwards, very laborious in the defensive functions up to the baseline. •They provide many good anticipations, mainly the players (# 3 # 18 # 7) •Apply intensive presence on the ball carrier in the

opponent’s court. •Main line defensive headfirst in the midfield. •Somewhat awkward in the flutter without giving offense oriented. •Hard on the mark 1 vs 1 and have resources and wicked in these situations. •Good head game.

ATTACK ANALYSIS: •Know how to performe a short combinations game to go laboring attacking moves in an organized and counterattacks. •Speed Attack fully maximizing its fitness. (Depth) •They are very skilled at hand to hand and they often spill out their halfbacks (the # 18) •Wasted several clear scoring chances. •They converted goals in stopped balls plays, very solid in the air game. •The attack highlights are the numbers 6 and 7 •Make many changes in orientation and uses the field in all its width (amplitude) •Often incorporate lateral fullbacks attacking. •Very good possession of the ball through mobility

# Nombre 1 Micheal PERELLO 12 Wilmer MARTINEZ

Posición GK GK

2 Jefrey CARDONA 3 Gabriel ORTIZ 4 Victor MATAMOROS 5 Diego ROSALES 6 Diylan ANDRADE 7 Jorge ALVAREZ 8 Edwin MANZANARES 9 Foslyn GRANT 10 Darixon VUELTO 11 Italo RAMOS 13 Carlos FERMAN 14 Allan RIVERA 15 Jeancarlo VARGAS 16 Diego VILLEDA 17 Walter RODRIQUEZ 18 Oslin SEVILLA

DF DF MF MF DF MF MF FW FW MF MF DF FW MF MF MF

and rotation of positions.

DEFICIENCIES: •Lack of coordination and communication in the attack combinations. •Lack of classical orchestrator in attacking able to handle the times •Inaccurate when print excessive speed to attack actions. Outstanding players: # 18. Oslin Sevilla. # 3. Gabriel Ortiz. # 10. Darixon Vuelto. # 6. Diylan Andrade. # 7. Jorge Álvarez. # 12. Wilmer Martínez. # 5. Diego Rosales. # 11. Ítalo Ramos.

TJ GA TjA TjR M NA D RQ 110 0 0 0 0 1 0 10.7 310 0 1 0 0 0 4 74.3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 386 0 0 0 0 0 0 55.1 420 0 0 0 0 0 2 90.0 129 0 0 0 0 1 0 13.4 309 1 0 0 0 0 6 154.1 364 1 0 0 0 0 2 102.0 348 1 1 0 0 0 3 104.7 375 1 0 0 0 0 0 73.6 42 0 0 0 0 1 0 1.0 327 8 2 0 4 0 5 361.7 220 5 0 0 2 1 3 221.4 179 0 0 0 0 1 0 20.6 184 0 1 0 0 0 0 16.3 157 3 0 0 0 1 1 92.4 111 1 0 0 0 1 0 30.9 259 1 0 0 0 0 0 57.0 327 0 0 0 0 0 3 91.7 4557 22 5 0 6 7 29

One of the most competitive countries in the Caribbean. Jamaica came into the tournament as one of the favorites to lift the trophy, but was very disappointing. Without having a technical and tactical high level and had a poor game organization. Failed to qualify for finals. Participated in the qualifiers in the group (B) playing against Granada in their first meeting and winning four goals to zero. Defeated two goals to 0 to the weak team of Santa Lucia and fall by 3-1 against Belize and 1-0 against Guatemala. With 7 goals in favor and 4 against to finally occupy the 12th place in the standings of the event. Had limitations in the management of the team and poor performance despite having good players on its payroll individually.

Tactical

Basic System of Play 1-4-4-2

Technical Analysis. •Deficiencies in its collective technical level, they did not have ball possession due to wide bad passes. Althogh they had some players with high technical level individually. •Good pitching technique on air plays. •Some difficulty presented when using dribble too often which caused unnecessary loss of balls. •Technical deficiencies in shots on goal short and medium distances.

Tactical Analysis. •Basic Training 1-4-4-2 without variation throughout the tournament. Which used personal mark over their center forwarder and nullified Jamaica offensive potential. •Due to the opponents that pushed them with marks, they offered technical and tactical deficiencies that disorganized them. •Their game was based on long runs and direct attacks on the front center # 10. They lost a lot of

passes and created great disruption offensive. They were unable to vary this offensive.

Analysis Attack •They concentrated their attacks on the touchlines through its skillful and fast # 12 which had a great game in its debut. But then did not perform well in the remaining matches. •Their offensive was based on in-depth long runs and most were bad passes. The # 10 Center Forwarder that is strong and tall, also lower his performance significantly after the first game. •Did not played compactly their lines. They did not have the support of the side defenses in attacks. •It was a team that throughout the tournament was decreasing its performance.

Defense Analysis.

•Four online Fullback that rarely helped when the team attacks, slow to move forward after gaining possession causing a space between themselves and the other six players. •Very little organization and little lateral support resulting in many situations 1vs1. Two centers slow that were weak against fast forwarders as in its match against Belize. •Good in the air play and defended well against stopped ball and corners.

Physical Analysis.

•Medium-sized players with fairly good physical condition, but with a front forwarder player who was clearly an overweight. •They kept a good pace and intensity in the games development for this level.

# Nombre 1 Jahvanni GRANT 13 Akeem'CHAMBERS

Posición GK GK

2 Stephan MALCOM 3 Khrishna CLARK 4 Ryhan KNIGHT 5 Jaaziel THOMPSON 6 Graeme REID 7 Charles GRANT 8 Jevoun MCKELLAR 9 Peter VASSELL 10 Peter CAMBELL 11 Jourdain FLETCHER 18 Jarrett CLIVE 14 Justin MCMASTER 15 Andrew JOSEPHS 16 Nicholas NELSON 17 Paul YOUNG 12 Deshawn BECKFORD

DF DF\MF DF DF DF MF MF MF FW MF MF FW FW FW DF MF

Deficiencies.

•Poor defensive and offensive organization. •Bad shot on target short and medium distances and lack of concentration. •Limited support of the fullbacks to attack not allowing to play in a compact between the lines. •Making bad decisions in passes to developing the attack combinations. •Poor team management for tactical variants and accurate indications during the game development. Jugadores destacados: # 12. Deshawn Beckford. # 2. Stephan Malcom. # 5. Jaaziel Thompson. # 9. Peter Vassell. # 10. Peter Cambell.

TJ GA TjA TjR M NA D RQ 70 0 0 0 0 0 1 25.0 210 0 0 0 0 1 1 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 280 1 1 0 0 0 1 65.0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.3 274 0 0 0 0 0 0 39.1 280 0 0 0 0 0 2 70.0 156 0 0 0 0 0 0 22.3 121 0 0 0 0 1 0 12.3 203 0 0 0 0 0 0 29.0 280 1 1 0 0 0 3 95.0 173 3 0 0 1 0 2 139.7 236 0 0 0 0 0 0 33.7 70 0 0 0 0 1 0 5.0 282 1 0 0 0 0 0 60.3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 137 1 0 0 0 1 0 34.6 97 0 0 0 0 1 1 23.9 181 0 0 0 1 0 1 65.9 3052 7 2 0 2 5 12

The selection of Martinique presented a team with very good competitive level which was growing during the course of the tournament. Its players had good physical and technical level and scoring ability. With a solid defensive line led by the # 7, a player with great technical and physical conditions, at the end he was selected to the all star team. They played five games winning (3) tying (1) and losing (1) 15 goals scored and only 3 against. This team had a very good performance in the tournament. We are sure that they are guaranteed, with this selection, and other potential players, Sub-17 future team in their country. Good management. The warming up was well grounded, permanently being assisted by their coach. They improved their performance over the tournament.

Tactical

Basic System of Play 1-4-2-3-1

Technical Analysis: •It was evolving in the course of the tournament, good improvement in all lines in the collective game, always with some individual problems, but can be overcome with effort. •Good individual and collective technical level. •Skilfull players with good passes and dribbling. •Presented technical deficiencies in the beatings of goal in short and medium distances. •Good pitching technique with air plays. •Loss of balls in many cases made by bad passes in long distance.

Physical Analysis: •It was also a line in the competition that managed to improve, it was a solid team on the physical aspect. • Highlighting their physical caracteristics in all its lines, it can be improved as they have the right qualities to become better players. •Tall players, strong, fast and powerful.

Tactical Analysis: •Their tactical system was the 1-4-2-3-1, player # 4 Kondjo Zebina, was used in the first game as left Halfback, then in the next two games as outside left forward, with good performance. •The system was consolidated through the games they performed. •They used a lot long runs and direct attacks. Losing a lot of passes on offense. •They grouped many players in midfield defensive functions.

Attack Analysis:

and long distance.

• It is projected on the sides, at times they abused the long pass to the leading player, in many cases bad passes. • The midfield line was likely to join the attack by surprise, excelling in that aspect Youri Oscar the # 8 and # 10 Hedson Nattes. • Technical deficiencies shots on goal in the short and medium distances. • Limitations for lost passes in quick combinations attack.

Outstanding players: # 7 Andrew Marie Sainte. Central Fullback. Technical and imposing physique. # 8 Youri Oscar. Organizer Halfback. Very hardworking and skillful. # 6 Kendrick Agot. Central Fullback. Sure and technical. # 10 Hedson Nattes Halfback. Skilfull and technical. # 1 Mathieu Madkaud. Very safe Goalkeeper and good saves. # 4 Kendjo Zebina. Outside Left Forward. Technical and support the attack. # 9 Bryan Mont. Central Forward. Scorer and powerful.

Deficiencies: •Improve the individual technical aspects, especially technical gestures of foot kick and head. •Improve the organization and functioning of both the attack and defense collectively, achieve set routine. •Improve technically in delivery passes in the mid

# Nombre 1 MADKAUD Mathieu 16 CASERUS Brandon

Posición GK GK

2 SOLON Jeremy 3 LISIMA Stanley 4 ZEBINA Kondjo 5 BIVARD Darren 6 AGOT Kendrick 7 MARIE SAINTE Andrew 8 OSCAR Youri 9 MONT Bryan 10 NATTES Hedson 11 MANERE Davy 12 Steeven Philoces 13 Ismael Bermignon 14 Yoiri&Rene Lois Arthur 15 NOTTE Boris 17 WASSOUF Fabio 18 Youri Girier Dufournier

MF DF DF DF MF DF MF FW FW MF

MF MF FW

TJ GA TjA TjR M NA D RQ 140 0 0 0 0 1 0 15.0 210 0 0 0 0 0 2 30.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 278 0 1 0 0 0 0 29.7 155 1 0 0 0 0 0 42.1 336 2 1 0 0 0 0 78.0 212 0 0 0 0 0 0 30.3 350 3 0 0 1 0 3 180.0 350 1 0 0 1 0 5 170.0 158 1 0 0 1 0 1 82.6 250 1 0 0 0 1 1 65.7 350 4 0 0 0 0 3 175.0 154 0 0 0 0 1 0 17.0 268 1 0 0 0 1 0 53.3 60 0 0 0 0 1 0 3.6 259 1 0 0 0 0 0 57.0 158 0 0 0 0 0 1 37.6 163 0 1 0 0 1 0 8.3 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.3 3860 15 3 0 3 6 16

The selection of Puerto Rico was one of the animators of the tournament teams for their technical quality and game organization. A team which showed that a good ground work with children is possible in the Caribbean and that the level of football can be improved. It was part of group (D) beating Martinique a strong team (2-1) in its first appearance, giving a demonstration of order and discipline tactics. Fall (3-1) before the powerful team of El Salvador, and (1-0) fasing another outstanding team, Haiti. They beat St. Vincent (6-0) Antigua and Barbuda (5-0) Scoring 14 goals in favor and only 5 against. Excellent team management and organization of work among technicians. Very well organized, warming up and its development. Puerto Rico presented a similar performance to that of the Central American countries.

Tactical

Basic System of Play 1-4-2-3-1

Technical Analysis:

Tactical Analysis:

• Very good individual and collective technique, they were improving that aspect during the tournament. • Very good control of the ball in short spaces and opponet pressure. • They provided a group of players with very good use of their skills in dribbling and progressive handlings. • Good command of ball possession in defense and midfield. • They used long passes to give breadth and shift in the game.

•The tactical system was 1-4-2-3-1, it was modified according to the result in the same game to 1-4-1-23. •They performed a game of amplitude and many orientastion changes. •Seeking the diagonals especially down the left. •Gave proper functioning sample to offense and defense. •Very good possession of the ball in defense and midfield. Also using the resources of skill players. •Counted in depth with his # 9 and opportunistic goalscorer area.

Physical Analysis: •In all games showed good physical level, some more demanding than others, but always maintained a good pace •They could improve according to their body complexion to have better performance. •Players mostly short but with a constant speed and pace of play.

Defense Analysis: •In all the games defensive zone was irregular in performance during the tournament, making failures especially in the game against El Salvador. • Always use two containment means giving some security to their backcourt, handled the pressure when loosing the ball

• Very fast transition from attack to defense and vice versa. • Performed a compact game between the lines. Minimizing the opponent’s spaces. • Sometimes they were defeated in the discussion of balls 1 vs 1 due to the physical force of opposites. • Only got 5 goals against in front of strong teams like El Salvador, Haiti and Martinique.

Attack Analysis: •Always seek the breadth and generate superior numbers on the sides, with the addition of # 15 Julio Rosado who was used by both sides in different games. •Orientation changes caused either by coaching or directly with good accuracy. •The # 12 Marco Arocha always fell to the back of the rival’s halfback to create numerical superiority in the middle, and leave space for the rising of the siders of its sector •Very good transition from defense to attack and ball handling with good combinations.

# Nombre 1 Marco RIVERA 13 Ruben LOPEZ

Posición

3 Yanoel HENRIQUEZ 4 Elismael ORTIZ 5 Christopher MARTINEZ 6 Joshua RIVERA 7 Jeimax OSORIO 8 Ryan LOPEZ 9 John HENRIQUEZ 10 Juan O'NEILL& 11 Nicolas LATONI 2 Andre RIVERA 14 Jose David CORTES 15 Julio ROSADO 16 Charles RIOS 17 Miguel PEREZ 18 Carmelo CARRILLO 12 Marco AROCHA

DF DF MF MF DF\MF MF FW MF MF DF DF\MF DF DF DF FW MF

•The organization of defense between the different lines, eg. halfbacks and fullbacks contributed to the attack and elaborated with breaks them.

Deficiencies:

•Its defense when pressed had difficulties playing the ball out from behind. • Technical difficulties with shots of goal short and medium distances. Jugadores destacados: # 3 Yanoel Henríquez. # 5 Christopher Martínez. # 9 John Henríquez. # 10 Juan O'Neill. # 12 Marco Arocha. # 15 julio Rosado. # 4 Kendjo Zebina. # 9 Bryan Mont.

TJ GA TjA TjR M NA D RQ 210 0 0 0 0 0 0 -20.0 140 0 0 0 0 1 0 15.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 312 0 0 0 0 0 1 59.6 287 0 0 0 0 0 0 41.0 238 0 0 0 0 0 1 49.0 121 1 1 0 1 1 1 62.3 196 1 0 0 0 1 1 58.0 328 2 0 0 1 0 4 171.9 281 5 0 0 1 0 3 210.1 189 0 0 0 0 0 1 42.0 231 2 0 0 0 1 0 68.0 201 0 0 0 0 0 0 28.7 168 0 0 0 0 1 0 19.0 249 1 0 0 0 1 0 65.6 162 0 0 0 0 1 0 18.1 123 0 0 0 0 0 0 17.6 184 0 0 0 0 0 0 26.3 214 2 0 0 0 0 2 100.6 3834 14 1 0 3 7 15

The selection of Saint Kitts was included in group C perhaps the most competitive level of the event. Were defeated against Honduras (6-0) and Guadalupe (4-1) reaching two wins against St. Martin (5-1) and Curacao (4-2) and occupying the third position in the group. They received 13 goals in 4 games and scoring 10 demonstrating their defensive weakness. They knew how to deal with all matches with great will to fight for victory. But still need to work hard in these categories the technical, tactical and organizational aspects of the team functioning.

Tactical

Basic System of Play 1-4-2-3-1

Technical Analysis. •Low technical level, both individually and collectively. •Technical deficiencies caused a lot of bad passes. • Individually highlighted the # 9 and # 21 due to its technical level. • Very little ball possession and continuity of the game due to technical deficiencies. • Low technical level in head balls discussion. • Technical deficiencies in shots on goal in short and medium distances.

Physical Analysis: • Players of medium height, strong, athletic. • Presented a low fitness.

Tactical Analysis •Their initial tactical system was 1-4-4-2 then from the 2nd match 1-4-2-3-1 playing their last two

meetings with this one. •They have no definite defensive organization. This starts when the player loses the ball but it is much disorganized. •Their attack is based on individual actions that can achieve alone their attackers.

Defense Analysis: •The defensive organization is loose with no defined structure. •Not able to make a compact game in both attack and defense, leaving large spaces between lines. •Serious deficiencies in the anticipations and toppings. •Weak at defensive 1 vs 1.

Attack Analysis:

Deficiencies:

•Poor play on offense, short of depth and counter area arrival. •They use a lot of long passes without precision. •The short passes quality is very bad. •Individual actions withouth coordination with the others primarily in attack combinations. •It was based on individual actions of # 9 and # 21 •No overflow performed in the sides. Did not use the amplitude of the field. •Not accompanied its center forwards. Lacking support in attacks of bottom lines.

•Tactical disorganization both offensive and defensive performance. •The lack of competitive experience showed very nervous players on the field in front of the opponent pressure. •Low technical level (short and long passes quality). •Their tactical performance was very poor. •Presented a low physical preparation level.

# Nombre 1 BROWNE Zaquelle Seth 18 GUMBS Meneliek

TJ GA TjA TjR M NA D RQ 146 0 0 0 0 0 0 -49.1 134 0 0 0 0 1 0 -45.9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 272 0 0 0 0 0 1 53.9 111 0 0 0 0 1 0 10.9 246 0 1 0 0 0 0 25.1 105 0 0 0 0 1 0 10.0 207 3 1 0 1 0 2 134.6 174 0 0 0 0 1 0 19.9 247 4 1 0 0 0 2 135.3 76 0 0 0 0 0 0 10.9 125 0 1 0 0 0 0 7.9 148 0 0 0 0 1 0 16.1 124 0 0 0 0 1 0 12.7 213 1 0 0 0 0 0 50.4 253 0 0 0 0 0 0 36.1 151 0 1 0 0 0 0 11.6 231 2 0 0 1 0 1 113.0 159 0 0 0 0 0 0 22.7 3122 10 5 0 2 6 6

Posición GK GK

2 ROBERTS Dagena Quan Gregry Zahim DF 3 BROWNE Ezer Alec Charles Junior FW 4 CRANSTON Kareem Jovis DF 5 WATTLEY Terrell Vanceroy Joseph DF 6 ARCHIBALD Steven Jr. MF 7 BELGROVE Ronaldo MF 9 LAKE Geovannie Omarie FW 10 DAVID Kejauni Akil Shamari MF 11 LIBURD Khalifah MF 13 DAVID Kizan Jadan Tyreke DF 14 HERBERT D Ondre Omar MF 15 FRANCIS Tyrique Emram FW 16 BRIDGEWATER Alijani Naim Shemiah DF 19 WARNER Tyquan Jamari MF 21 MITCHUM Yohannes Menelik MF 12 Anwa Dilon Springer DF

100

Outstanding players: # 21 Menely Mitchum. # 6 Steven Archibal. # 9 Omarye Lake.

101

The representative selection of St. Lucia in the Caribbean was the team that occupied the last place in the qualifying group B, presented a team with a low competitive level on technical, tactical and organizational aspects of performance in general. Played 4 games being defeated in the 4 against Belize (1-0), Jamaica (2-0), Guatemala (5-1) and Granada (2-0). 10 goals against and only 1 in favor. Played maintaining a correct Fair Play attitude by receiving only two yellow cards in the event. This brother country must deeply work in the teaching of technical basics elements of football at youth and childrens categories.

102

Tactical

Basic System of Play 1-4-2-3-1

Technical Analysis. •Presented technical deficiencies and low level both individual and collective. •Little ball possession due to poor technique in passes. •Only one goal scored because of the low technical level in the shooting to opposing goal. •Under rival pressure they did not coordinate the technical movements on the ball.

Physical Analysis. •Low fitness of their players to maintain a steady pace during the game. •Good height and size of its players.

Tactical Analysis. •Basic system 1-4-4-2 without variations throughout all their games. •Performed a counterattack game and direct attacks

with long passes, but always lost the ball due to bad passes to the rival. Disrupting the team. •Very limited mobility that also contributed to the ball loses easier. •They had not planned moves in punishment and corners.

Defense Analysis. • Defensive disorganization by leaving many spaces between lines and free play to the opposing strikers. •Weak in situations 1 vs 1 and lack of coverage. •Team procedure in defensive organization had deficiencies due to lack of compact and organized game in depth and breadth. •Strong in discussing air balls in head kicks.

103

Attack Analysis.

Deficiencies.

•They were limited in the attack by their low technical level that not allowed them to make offensive plays from the ball possesion. •Their attack was based mainly on long runs and direct attacks, most ended in bad passes. •Scored only a goal in the entire event. Demonstrating lack of depth and danger to the opponent.

•Low technical level individually and collectively. Poor technique. •Low physical level to maintain a steady pace of play throughout the game. •Lack of international competitive experience and game routine. •Doamin of the technical basics. •Defensive disorganization. Jugadores destacados: #10. Noah Nicholas. Forward. Skilfull and hardworking.

104

# Nombre 1 Shervin BARCLETT 20 Andre GUSTAVE

Posición GK GK

2 Ryi MARYAT 3 Damian LOUIS 4 Zachernus SIMON 5 Harrison MOFFAT 7 Cassius JOSEPH 6 Anton PAUL 8 Nyrone WINTER 9 Ekiel GREENIDGE 10 Noah NICHOLAS 11 Jamie PROSPERE 12 Cassius JONES 18 Jhadel PROSPERE 13 Lael CHERRY 14 Bradley CYRIL 15 Jamille REGIS 21 Emerson Biscette

DF DF MF DF MF DF MF MF FW FW MF MF MF MF DF MF

TJ GA TjA TjR M NA D RQ 280 0 0 0 0 0 1 -45.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 280 0 0 0 0 0 0 40.0 89 0 0 0 0 0 0 12.7 280 0 0 0 0 0 1 55.0 280 0 0 0 0 0 0 40.0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.3 280 0 0 0 0 0 0 40.0 262 0 0 0 0 0 2 67.4 47 1 0 0 0 0 0 26.7 280 0 0 0 0 0 3 85.0 280 0 1 0 0 0 1 45.0 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.6 133 0 0 0 0 1 0 14.0 231 0 0 0 0 0 1 48.0 260 0 1 0 0 0 0 27.1 80 0 0 0 0 1 0 6.4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 3082 1 2 0 0 2 9

105

Without doubt it was the weakest team in the tournament, they were virtually massacred by all rivals marking only 1 goal (they have two in favor due to an own goal) and receive the shocking figure of 34 in just five games, this clearly demonstrates that they participated in the event with many deficiencies at all levels, from technical management to the various aspects of the game, The St. Maarten selection needs to review the work in the lower categories if they want to achieve better results, this is the experience that the event could have provided them. Recognizing their participation in the event and despite to their loses, the team showed a great sport shame and desire of victory.

106

Tactical

Basic System of Play 1-4-4-2

Technical Analysis: •Do not dominate the technical basics of game both individual and collective. •Barely managed to combine actions of 2-3 consecutive passes. •In essence they are starting to play football at this level.

Physical Analysis:

• Poor Preparation, they ended exhausted. Very low level indeed. • No legs or lungs, it is perceived to be a team with many deficiencies in their preparation as a whole. • Do not react to any need to attack or defend.

Tactical Analysis:

•Their initial system was 1-4-4-2 with a tendency to delay one of their forward and sometimes both. •Total disorganization at different times of the game. •Do not have a defined style of play and constantly vary the positioning of the players.

•The modifications did not produce any change in the game •They do not do technical, they do not know tactical, no football organization.

Defense Analysis: •Line of 4 very rigid in their movements and stowed on their area. •Innocents in marking and weak in hand to hand (1 vs 1). •Difficulties in the air game primarily on the stopped ball plays. •Too bad, no basics to defend exist. •Arrive at the wrong time, when they want to react already received goals. •The ball surprise them, when they want to run to mark, it's too late. •They received nothing but 34 goals against in 5 games.

107

Attack Analysis:

Deficiencies:

•Barely approached to the opponent area. •Lack of resources to create dangerous situations in the rival area. •Nothing is prepared in the stopped ball plays. •They were restricted to just throwing balls forward without guidance.

•It is not that they are limited, but it is unfortunately that they do not play football. • Virtually in all game aspects, it shows a team that has not been trained, with many gaps in the technical tactical order and physical limitations. • Too bad the team direction in the warming and the alternates go straight from the bench to the field. Outstanding players: This selection lacked of prominent players in the event.

# Nombre Posición 20 Austel Ethan RICHARDSON GK 1 Joshua Claudio Warsono ASTROKARIJO GK 2 Jordan Louie Henry HALLEY 3 Yannick Rowan DINANE 4 Elvin Gerhard ALBERTS 5 Reno Denzel BROOKS 6 Stephon'HARNARAINE 7 Navin Matawaran PREMKUMAR 8 Brandon Lee Jean-Marie POTMIS 9 Joel Anthony LAWRIE 10 Kumar Cris SERRANT 11 Malcolm Thairik MARTES 12 James Anthony COOK 13 Matthew Clement Celsus DOOKIE 14 Djai Joeri ESSED 15 Malik Shaquille MARTES

108

DF\MF FW MF DF MF MF DF\MF MF MF MF DF FW DF\MF DF

TJ GA TjA TjR M NA D RQ 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 -29.0 343 0 0 0 0 0 0 -261.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 58 0 0 0 0 0 0 8.3 350 1 0 0 0 0 0 70.0 56 0 0 0 0 0 0 8.0 350 0 0 0 0 0 0 50.0 65 0 0 0 0 0 0 9.3 244 0 0 0 0 0 0 34.9 269 1 0 0 0 0 1 73.4 211 0 0 0 0 0 0 30.1 350 0 0 0 0 0 0 50.0 254 0 0 0 0 1 0 31.3 302 0 0 0 0 0 0 43.1 350 0 0 0 0 0 0 50.0 315 0 1 0 0 0 0 35.0 335 0 1 0 0 0 0 37.9 3859 2 2 0 0 1 1

109

The selection of Saint Martin presented a team wich prevailed the individual efforts of players over the team play. Participated in group C, made 4 games losing three and winning just one against the young team of Curacao. Receiving 13 goals with 6 in favor. To the extent that the tournament developed were improving, based in physical more than the basic fundamentals of football. Must immediately deepen teaching of basic technical elements of soccer on early ages.

110

Tactical

Basic System of Play 1-4-2-3-1

Technical Analysis:

Tactical Analysis

• Shortage of technicians’ resources in the individual and the collective. • Their technical gestures lack of domain of the basic fundamentals. • There were escarce combinations effective. • Punts without peer orientation to team mates. • Poor quality of long passes and receptions do not have ball possession. • Deficient technical level. • They want to run so much that they have huge technical inaccuracies.

•Initial basic system only in the matches 1-4-2-3-1. •Big tactical deficiencies, their game is based on victory attitude and fitness. •Only two modifications performed and both man by man. •Not handled wisely the match time and followed the pace imposed by the opponent. •Had no answers in the tactical order to modify their behavior in the field against different opponents and game situations.

Physical Analysis: •Well physically. Running is what they do best •Endured the onslaught of rival until their legs held. •Powerful but decreased their physical efficiency in the late match.

Defense Analysis: •Main line of defense turned in on their area and sometimes further back. •Deficients on defense of center and stopped ball plays from the sides (received 13 goals). •Poor communication between Fullbacks and goalkeeper •Very slow in the relay to ensure coverage once they were overwhelmed.

111

•Do not know how to use their fitness. •Fool on the mark in the 1vs 1 and tighten the opponent. • Gain some balls, the split ones, because they go determined but a fake or feint leaves them out of the play.

Attack Analysis: •Very limited on offense, only the right halfback occasionally disturbed opponent’s defense. •Few situations of danger in the opposite area, very isolated their players when they manage to reach the opposing goal. •Very rigid in their performance and the outside forwards never joined the attack. •Their attacks are counter or direct long runs. •One against all at individual dribbling. Do not raise their heads to define situations.

112

# Nombre 1 Jean Francois PETCHY 27 Nairobi ARRONDELL

Posición GK GK

2 Sebastien LAKE 3 Karl MONTFORT 4 Wrubens DUPALUS 5 Alston LARMONY 6 Hazael DOLLIN 7 Hugo CHAMPION 8 Federic REYMOND 9 Joel DAVIS 10 Stan-Lei STEPHEN 11 Akim ARRONDELL 13 Jean Philippe DESPEINE 14 Joshua BRYAN 15 Aaron MARIUS 16 Aldonique HELLIGAR 17 Jason MACCOW 12 Jean-Chrisnel DODIN

DF DF DF DF MF MF MF FW FW MF FW FW MF FW FW MF

•These deficiencies make them lose clear scoring options. •They perform shots on soal being badly placed and located.

Deficiencies: •Serious individual and collective technical difficulties in all the basic fundamentals of football. •Limitations on the technical and tactical performance in defense and attack. •Disruption of the team on the game field. •Technical limitations in the execution of the passes and shots on goal. Outstanding players: 8. Frederick Reymond. Halfback.

TJ GA TjA TjR M NA D RQ 272 0 0 0 0 0 1 -76.1 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 280 0 1 0 0 0 0 30.0 280 0 0 0 0 0 0 40.0 280 0 1 0 0 0 0 30.0 210 0 1 0 0 0 1 35.0 280 0 0 0 0 0 1 55.0 148 1 0 0 0 0 0 41.1 259 4 0 0 1 0 2 172.0 243 0 0 0 0 0 0 34.7 124 0 0 0 0 0 0 17.7 266 0 0 0 0 0 1 53.0 32 0 0 0 0 0 0 4.6 118 1 0 0 0 1 0 31.9 32 0 0 0 0 0 0 4.6 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.3 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.6 90 0 0 0 0 1 0 7.9 210 0 0 0 0 1 0 25.0 3152 6 3 0 1 3 6

113

114

The team from St. Vincent and the Grenadines was part of the group D in the qualifiers stage having a weak participation, losing their 5 games and receive 21 goals against and only two in favor. Being located at the last place of the Group. Showed very low level in the basics fundamental principles of football in the technical and tactical order. The team management level was not good even in the development and organization of the warming up and preparation for the game and discipline out of the field. They should establish a basic training program in technical and organizational teaching of the teams at these ages.

Tactical

Basic System of Play 1-4-4-2

Technical Analysis: •Lacking of technical collective functioning and therefore individual lacking. •The goalkeeper very limited in its functions by limited technical resources. •Bad ball controls, their driving was very poor so always ended crashing with the opponent or the ball was going out from their control. •Aspect to be improved is the technical gesture controls with either foot or head. •Driving other technical element to emphasize a better ball control and play. •The player with the ball is the most important player. •Deficient goal shots due to low technical level.

Physical Analysis: •Poor physical condition which was diminishing as the tournament progressed. •Due to some player’s injury, the team finished the game with two less players in the squad.

•Their physique shows, that they have good physical conditions to work and improve fine pure speed, reaction speed, mental speed , flexibility, agility, coordination and most importantly the ability to manipulate the ball speed and maintain control.

Tactical Analysis: •The tactical system was always the 1-4-4-2, without changing it in any games. •Their own positioning left spaces despite maintaining a good number of players on defense. •There was no depth or support to the player with the ball, much less movement of the ball to other teammates. •Inefficient long outputs with a great loss of balls. •Disruption in running the offense and defense. •Only scored 2 goals in the whole tournament demonstrating defects in attacks.

115

Analysis in defense:

Deficiencies:

•It’s totally misplaced line of defense in their area without stagger, and leaving infinitely many rivals spaces, usually always marked in 1vs1 without coverage to assist mates. •Very weak and disorganized defensive system. Ignorance of the basic principles on defense. •Grouping of players in its defensive zone.

•The individual technical level was a negative factor in their performance as they failed to control the ball therefore impossible for them to have progression of their collective game. Very low technical level generally. •There was no compaction in their lines, much less pressure on the player with the ball, there was no organization in their tactical moves. •Physical level, quality to be developed with much emphasis as they are holders of a good physique, that development would allow better growth in their level of play.

Attack Analysis: •Without any way to overcome opposing defenses, very isolated center lines with the attack lines, there was never support to the player with the ball. •Disorganization in the attack functions. •No arrivals and depth to the opposite area. •Only scored two goals in the entire event. Even facing weak teams.

116

# Nombre 1 BUTCHER Nyron 20 LEWIS Javil

Posición GK GK

4 ROUSE Derron 8 DAVIS Tevin 3 MCKIE Timoon 17 CLARKE Kewon 10 DENNIE Marcus 5 COMPTON John 7 JOHN Dylan 15 JAMES Jante 14 VICTORY Avanzini 19 BISHOP Jamal 12 SOLOMON Carlos 6 PRINCE Trey 18 SAMUEL Javal 2 Christopher Harris 16 CHARLES Mark 9 PENISTON Kaicy

DF DF DF FW MF DF MF FW MF MF FW MF DF MF DF FW

Outstanding players: # 9 Kaicy Peniston. # 8 Tevin Davis. TJ GA TjA TjR M NA D RQ 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 -18.6 348 0 0 1 0 0 1 -145.3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 350 0 0 0 0 0 1 65.0 342 1 0 0 0 0 0 68.9 271 0 1 0 0 0 0 28.7 304 0 0 0 0 0 0 43.4 180 0 0 0 0 1 0 20.7 89 0 0 0 0 0 0 12.7 350 0 1 0 0 0 0 40.0 261 0 0 0 0 1 0 47.3 166 0 0 0 0 1 0 18.7 156 0 0 0 0 0 0 22.3 292 0 0 0 0 0 1 56.7 227 0 1 0 0 0 0 22.4 126 0 0 0 0 1 0 13.0 84 0 0 0 0 0 0 12.0 190 0 0 0 0 0 0 27.1 105 1 0 0 0 1 0 30.0 3851 2 3 1 0 5 4

117

The Virgin Islands team was finally located on the 5th. place of group (A) achieving only a victory against the weak team of St. Maarten and a draw with Bahamas. They only scored 5 goals and received 30 goals against, including two on their own goal, they lack of a good organization both in offensive and defensive order requiring deep work with young players at all levels if they want to raise their level . It should be recognized regardless of their low level that their young players always competed with sports shame and responded positively to their presence and participation in the event.

118

Tactical

Basic System of Play 1-4-1-4-1

Technical Analysis:

Tactical Analysis:

•Do not dominate the individual and collective technical fundamentals of the game •Few combinations and no ball possession. •They do not have players who excel in handling the ball. •Lack of precision passing, receptions without guidance to the next action mainly from aerial balls, poor command of the non-skilfull leg. •Uncoordinated technical gestures.

•Initial basic system 1-4-1-4-1, often changed to 1-54-1, since their halfback no. 17 was placed between the centrals. •In all games their formation was changed. •No variants to counter the superiority of their opponents. •The modifications did not alter the limited operation of the equipment. •Very disorganized in their offensive and defensive performance. •Due to the low technical level it was impossible to keep organized their tactical system.

Physical Analysis: •No highlighted qualities in this regard. •Each divided ball was lost by been very slow, lack of power and resilience to escort the few attacks made, as well as the folds to which they were forced. •Short players with no physical condition that warrants a stable level of play during the match.

119

Defense Analysis: •They carried out a zone defense with delayed main line of resistance formed by 4 players. •They used line of five sometimes, but they could never stop counter attacks. •Innocent on markings and in hand to hand duels. •Ineffective in defending corners and free shots. •Easily loose their back, both the central and side players. •Do not dominate defensive principles. •Received 30 goals against in only 5 games.

Attack Analysis: • Do not set or present arguments to create dangerous situations in the opponent’s area. • Unable to make organized attacks. • Merely sent long balls, sometimes without good guidance to his only man ahead, the No. 10. Isolated

120

# Nombre 1 Jesse WYATT 18 Nick MURIEL

Posición GK GK

2 Jett BLASCHKA 3 Kegon MAYS 4 Humberto DELGADO III 5 Shmuel EDNEY-WILLIAMS 6 Dante NICHOLAS 7 Jacob BORDEN 8 George ASHLEY III 9 Charles MALIK 10 Luke PATRIE 11 Grant FARRELL 12 Carson KENDALL 13 Evan JONES 14 Jackson SANDERS 15 Rashuan SIMON 16 Nakeeme JULIAN 17 Ca Jani FAHIE

MF MF MF DF MF MF DF FW FW MF DF\MF DF FW DF DF\MF FW

all the time from the rest of the team. • They lacked of depth in attacks, not even escorted the long passes made to his center forwarder. • They have no management on the offensive principles.

Deficiencies: •Virtually in all aspects of the game, it shows a team not well trained, with many gaps in the technical-tactical order and physical limitations. •Poor team management, warm-ups without the required quality and alternates do not even warm up to enter the game. •They must provide a stable job, steady and durable in order to offer a technical education to the children of this brother country. Outstanding players: No player in this selection was highlighted at the event. TJ GA TjA TjR M NA D RQ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 350 0 1 0 1 0 1 -220.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 350 0 1 0 0 0 0 40.0 170 0 0 0 0 0 0 24.3 176 0 0 0 0 1 0 20.1 285 1 0 0 0 0 0 60.7 104 1 0 0 0 1 0 29.9 350 0 0 0 0 0 0 70.0 350 0 0 0 0 0 0 50.0 143 0 0 1 0 0 0 0.4 290 1 1 0 1 0 1 91.4 164 0 0 0 0 0 0 23.4 200 0 0 0 0 1 0 23.6 164 0 1 0 0 1 0 8.4 35 0 0 0 0 0 0 5.0 324 0 0 0 0 0 0 46.3 350 0 0 0 0 0 0 50.0 38 0 0 0 0 1 0 0.4 3843 5 4 1 2 5 2

121

122

VI. Conclusions.

VII. Recommendations.

•This tournament is a total success for which its accomplishment represents and for the future prospects in the CONCACAF development. •Very good organization of the event in all the different activities. Thanks to CONCACAF, the local organizing committee and the government and institutions support of Cayman Islands. •The presence of our President, General Secretary and executive committee members in all competitive tournament dates. •The first time participation of 22 countries of the Caribbean and Central America in the same event. •The possibility of these young football players to compete against teams from different regions, conveying their experiences and playing level.

•Keep on developing in a steady manner, in a cycle of two years, this event category Sub 15, for which it represents in the order of organized, stable and growing development of football in CONCACAF. •Link the finall results achieved to the classification for the World Youth Olympic Games which take place with Sub 15 teams. •Involve in our tournament all Sub 15 CONCACAF countries. Based on the financial support of the confederation to each country. •Demand compulsory in the year that the event takes place to set aside a sum of the same funding for the preparation and participation of each selection; if not, the fund will not be provided. •Conduct a meticulous study of developing the event with qualifiers stages (for play levels, maybe a 1st and a 2nd division. The last ones of the first division move down to 2nd, and the top two first of 2nd division move up to 1rst for future tournaments) where all CONCACAF countries participate, and play at least 4-6 games then have a grand final with the best 12-16 teams. Assign a financial assistance to the host countries. •With the participation of all countries of different regions, we achieve a broad competitive exchange, experiences and game systems. Which would contribute significantly to the development of football. •Remain developing the training programs and license for coaches in the area. •Provide the necessary attention to archers area in the teaching of young people and the training of specialists as teachers in that position. •Develop training programs for specialists in the area of physical training in young ages. •Starting from all so far observed and the deficiencies noticed, we recommend an increase marked percent preparation to the teams of this age to devote technical knowledge and daily work contact ball. •We observed in the technical questionnaire

•Involving young referees in their full development. •Competitive and management experience of 22 comettee of national coaches. •The football great atmosphere created in the Cayman Islands, a country with no great tradition in football. •The Conduction of a competitive schedule that allowed the teams to play 4 to 7 games. Contributing to raising the competitive experience of these young players. •It was observed and verified clearly the technical, tactical, and leadership differences among the countries of Central America and the Caribbean. •The clear distinction in three ranges of football performance level among all the participating countries. •The tournament was an offensive event due to the number of goals scored and game methods. •It was observed inadequacies in the techniques, tactics, and lack of concentration in these ages, significantly in the countries of the Caribbean region. •The lack of tactical and organizational knowledge as well as the game discipline in fulfilling the different roles were the most deficiencies observed in most teams.

responses an emphasis made by the Central American countries based on the technical and organizational teaching, different from the Caribbean responses, where the prevailing criteria was the physical. •We recommend to this age the ensurance of work in organization and tactical discipline, of basic knowledge and functions of each position and player within the field. •Build a basic preparation program for this category startingg from the observations made at the event. Which are our realities, strengths and weaknesses. •Defficiencies should be worked out deeply to narrow them, to be able to develop technical professional functioning commettees among our three regions (North America, UNCAF and CFU) •Assess and consider training on the most significant shortcomings and basics of preparation for coaches of the participating teams in CONCACAF events, before starting these prior preparation stage teams. After the tournament finishes evaluate and deliver course certification according to the level shown by the technician. That way it is real and productive the continuity, and monitoring of CONCACAF overcoming. •Keep on providing significant support to the development and progression of football in CONCACAF in school and youth ages. •Achieve a technical and competitive follow up to these teams and countries participating in this event. •Accomplish a managerial and technical analysis of the countries that did not participate. Knowing the causes and encourage them to be incorporated into the next tournament. •Institute CONCACAF ranking development and incorporate the results and participation of different countries. This ranking data should be shared among all the countries and be rewarded in the final contest of the year.

123

Members of the technical study group (TSG) in Sub-15 tournament Cayman Islands 2013. Mr. Luis Hernandez Herez. AFC President. Member of CONCACAF Executive Committee. Chief of the CONCACAF Technical Study Group (TSG).