Concrete issue 044 22 February 1995

Page 1

- - -- --- - - - -- -- - - - - - -- - - - - - -- - -

- - --

- - -· - --

tHI

I

PIZZA? USIC INTERIVEW EXTRAVAGANZI. EAT 'Concrete' rates the SHAMPOO I DEUCE I SLEEPER I THE REAL McCOY I EMF

local delivery outlets •I

I

vote to keep Waterfront UNION officers last night thanked Concrete after the first quorate meeting for two years voted to keep The Waterfront open, writes Miche/e du Randt. For last issue, Concrete urged students to turn up and vote at the UGM to guarantee the survival of the popular music venue. And 391 students packed into the LCR to discuss whether the Union should continue to run it. Said Union Finance Officer, John Holmes: "From the turnout, it is clear that where an issue is seen to directly affect students, they will come out and have their say.· But the requ ired quoracy for the discussion of room rents fell short, after over 300 students walked out after the Waterfront vote. "lt's a shame they left after the Waterfront motion in the numbers that they did", John added, "because the issues that were to be discussed had not only an effect on them but certainly on future students here they were important and needed discussing ." "In terms of The Waterfront, clearly no-one opposed it, so it's obvious that students are keen on The Waterfront staying open, whatever the terms .· John was quick to praise Concrete for campaigning on the issue. Had the meeting been inquorate or the motion been rejected , it is likely the venue would have closed for good . "Concrete clearly prioritized The Waterfront" , he said. "If the Union believes that rents and accommodation are issues which students should be affected by, then we should market these properly to get this number of people here.' • There was some discussion on how recent profits should be spent, and part of the motion detailing plans for a new manager was rejected following objections from the majority of students present.

_ _os_e_s y_et more cas 1n Registrr_p_i!y_-oH scandal ~ L

EXCL~INVESllGATlON by S1mon Mann

l _

BLUNDERING Registry bosses were forced to pay out a staggering £35,000 in compensation ... after the VC secretly suspended one of his own top employees! The high-flying PR official, Nina Anstee, 47, took UEA to an Industrial Tribunal last September, with a catalogue of complaints, alleging ' sex discrimination', ' unfair dismissal', 'victimisation' and ' breach of contract' - but won the tax-free out-of-court settlement "by way of compensation for termination of employment. " This figure also included £5 ,000 in legal expenses. Said Ms Anstee, who has since left her £30,000 a year post, "The way they [her bosses] dealt with the situation was hugely inappropriate." But Personnel chief, Richard Beck, defended the University's actions, despite refu s ing to respond to a list of 21 questions posed last week by this newspaper, about cloak-and-dagger operations. • Concrete began investigating the case when unsubstantiated rumours emerged that Ms Anstee, had been 'summarily dismissed' from her job, which ironically involved fund-raising and the promotion of UEA.

Inset: (Top) VC, Derek Burlcel (Bottom) Nina Anstee

UU'S Independent Student Ne '

pape•

7,000 cop·es ev

rr foftn·gllt

1: (0t&OI) 150558


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.
Concrete issue 044 22 February 1995 by Concrete - the official student newspaper of UEA. - Issuu