Cory Fernandez Work Sample Fall 2010
Class: Studio I Year: Fall 2009 Project:Storm King Artist In Residence
Cory Fernandez Work Sample
Storm King Art Center Artist In Residence Student : Cory Fernandez Instructor: Julio Figueroa
Wood My design concept for the artist in residence at the Storm King Art Center began with lookin at two things. One, the building material that would be used for the design, wood, and also the context of the surrounding site. Wood provides a connection with the surrounding nature and I wanted my structure to celebrate wood as a material. What I found most interesting about wood is that it grows from the core out, in layers. With this idea I began to form a concept that could be used as an architectural concept that my stucture like wood can also grow from the core out.
Sculptures When Looking at the stucture at Storm King art center I most appreciated the ones that fit the best contextually with the park. These were Andy Goldsworthy’s “Storm King Wall,” Maya Lin’s “Wave Field” and Richard Serra’s Shunnemunk Fork. I found that what related these sculptures most to the landscape was that they emerged from the lanscape at an angle rather than jutting straight out or being placed on top. This concept coincided with my interset in the way a tree grow in that it was as if the sculpture grew from the ground.
Circulation The circulaion is divided into two essential paths. A private path and a public path. The public path is meant to bring people through each density of the building, building up an anxiety and a desire to reach the core of the building. Throughout the path to the core of the building views to the central sculpture garden are there but are disturbed by the structure of the building or the trees in the sculpture garden. A feeling of relief should be present when one reaches the core of the structure. The private path is very direct and allow the artist to reach sculpture garden and studio from the residence.
Program Shop Welcome Center Studio Workspace Sculpture Garden/ Exterior Exhibit Living Room Bathroom Kitchen Bedroom
Public vs Private Public Private The public and private sectors of the buliding are mainly seperated by the axis of symmetry of the grid system with the public side being closest to the public road and the private side being closest to the private road. This idea of seperating the public and private sectors helped with choosin a site location for the building, being placed where thw public and private roads are most closely pinched together
Elements The compents that compose the structure are - 4”x12” Gluelam engineered lumber for vertical support -2”x12” wood dimensional framing - curtain wall assembly -cmu foundation walls -plywood floor decking and roof sheathing - aluminum rolled roofing -2”x4” wood batons as facade louvers
Section A Scale 1/8”= 1’0”
Storm King Art Center Artist In Residence Student : Cory Fernandez Instructor: Julio Figueroa
Section A
Studio Workspace Up
Welcome Center
Shop
Up Up
Exterior Exhibit
Living Room Section B
Up
Section B
Kitchen
Bedroom
Section A
N 0’
5’
25’
50’
Ground Floor Plan Scale 1/8”=1’0”
Section B Scale 1/8”= 1’0”
Class: Studio I Year: Fall 2009 Project: Urban Nexus on the NYC Highline
Cory Fernandez Work Sample
The Highline
Cory Fernandez Urban Nexus Studio: Julio Figueroa
Folding
Folding 2
Folding 3
Circulation Lifting
Extruding
1 2 3 4 5
6
7
+
Old Geometry
8
9 10 ll - Density
New Geometry Section 2
Section 1 DN
Section 1 Scale 1/8” = 1’ 0”
Cory Fernandez Urban Nexus Studio: Julio Figueroa
The Highline
+ 6”
UP
Plan Ground Level Scale 1/8” =1’0”
+8’ 5.27”
+ 6”
UP
+ 21’
UP
UP +4’ 5.67”
+12’ 4.87”
UP
UP
+16’ 4.47”
UP UP
UP
+ 21’ UP
UP
UP
+24’ 11.5”
Plan Highline Level Scale 1/8” =1’0”
Class: Studio II Year: Spring 2010 Project: Jersey City Boys and Girls Club (Competition Winner)
Cory Fernandez Work Sample
Jersey City Boys and Girls Club Site
Site Plan
Floor Plan
Sitting Areas
Green Lounge Areas
Spectacle Seating
Program Gym Classrooms Theatre
Program
Greenspace
Seating
Site Circulation
Staff Public Entry Changing/Locker rooms
Process Circulation
Activities Per Time of Day Shadow Study
= 100% Aperture
Swimming Classroom Learning Most Circulation
= 40% Aperture
Reading
= 30% Aperture
Mock Up
= 20% Aperture = 15% Aperture
Drawing One on One Mentoring Arts and Crafts Staff Work
Approach from Nearest Schools
Listen to Music
= 12% Aperture
Eating Play Instruments
= 8% Aperture
Inside Sports
= 5% Aperture = 0 % Aperture 6am
Watching Movies Large Assemblies/ Lectures Loading Unloading Supplies 7am
8am
9am
10am
11am
12 pm
1pm
2pm
4pm
3pm
5pm
6pm
7pm
8pm
9pm
Tectonic Application Program Layout
Gym 10,000 sq ft
Shower 180 sq ft
Mentoring Room 140 sq ft
Mentoring Room 140 sq ft
Shower 180 sq ft
Directors Office 180 sq ft
Changing Room 500 sq ft
Staff room 420 sq ft
Changing Room 500 sq ft
Public Entry Space 1000
ClassRoom 1200 sq ft
ClassRoom 1200 sq ft
ClassRoom 1200 sq ft ClassRoom 1200 sq ft
View Points from Approach
Aperture Gradient
Program Gradient
10pm
11pm
Class: Studio II Year: Spring 2010 Project: Masonry Build Competition (Competition Winner: Best Mock-up)
Cory Fernandez Work Sample
Masonry Build: Digital mockup
Masonry Build: Physical models
Class: Studio II Year: Spring 2010 Project: Brick Wall Development (Continuation of Wall Development for NJIT Idea Factory proposal)
Cory Fernandez Work Sample
Digitalize
Industrialize Conceptualize
Materialize
Egg Crate
PREASSEMBLY
Step 4
Step 3
Step 2
Step 1
Step 5
D E F G H I H G F E D C B A B C D E F G H I H G F E D C B A B C D
30 29 28 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 09 08 07 06 05 04 03 02 01 X0 X1 X2
Reflect
Reflect
Reflect
Reflect
R 09 25
Q 08 10 24 26
I 09 25
H 08 10 24 26
P 07 11 23 27
G 07 11 23 27
O 06 12 22 28
F 06 12 22 28
N 05 13 21
E 05 13 21 29
M 04 14 20
D X2 04 14 20 30
L 03 15 19
C X1 03 15 19
K
02 16 18
J 01 17
B X0 02 16 18
A 01 17
. .. ..
. .. ....
.. .. .. ..
.. ... . ..
...
Laying Template
...
Removing Template
. ... .. ..
...
.. .. .. ..
.. ... . ..
.. ... ..
.. .. .. ..
. .. ..
.. ... ..
. .. ..
Story Polls
Laying Brick
Brick Rainscreen Assembly
Steel Framing support
Curtain Wall Assembly
Class: Aggregated Assemblies Year: Summer 2010 Project: Component Design
Cory Fernandez Work Sample
Cory Fernandez
Component Design & Aggregation
Solid Geometry In this phase I picked a known solid geometry ,the tetrahedron. By understanding the configuration and angles of the shape I was able to build a Grasshopper definition based on points, lines, and planes.
Tetrahedron
Aggregated Assemblies
Cory Fernandez
Component Design & Aggregation
Geometry Alteration In this phase tried to understand how the tetrahedron attached to itself.
Realizing the tetrahedron has a very limited face to face connection I altered the shape by truncating the points. This created three new faces making the unit have seven faces instead of four. This allowed for more aggregation oppurtunities
Tetrahedron
Aggregated Assemblies
Cory Fernandez
Component Design & Aggregation
Aggregations This comparison shows how the original tetrahedron tends to aggregate vs the new irregular tetrahedron’s tendency to aggregate.
Tetrahedron
Aggregated Assemblies
Cory Fernandez
Component Design & Aggregation
Perspective This perspectival view describes some of the spaces that occur inside and around the new truncated tetrahedron.
Tetrahedron
Aggregated Assemblies
Cory Fernandez
Common Piece
Locking Piece
Component Design & Aggregation
Fabrication Idea 3 This new component uses a series of different joints. Two different pieces a common piece and a locking piece are used to form the component. The unit will rely on friction and the plasticity of the plywood to hold together. Plan
Section
Tetrahedron
Aggregated Assemblies
Cory Fernandez
Component Design & Aggregation New Component Fabrication Process
This diagram shows how the unit is to be assembled. First two common pieces are fitted together. Then the third must slide into the one and rotate into the other slot. Here the material will be deformed slightly but its resistance to deformation will create the friction needed to hold the parts together.
Step 1
Exploded View
Step 2
Lastly the three unit are locked together by the locking piece.
Step 3
Tetrahedron
Aggregated Assemblies
Cory Fernandez
Component Design & Aggregation New Component Aggregation
The unit will be able to receive other components from 4 different faces. Notches are used to create friction to hold the units together. One uni is composed of two face types. One where all three common pieces meet. And the other where two common and one locking piece meet.
Tetrahedron
Aggregated Assemblies
Cory Fernandez
Component Design & Aggregation Fabrication 2
In the second batch micro adjustments were made to allow for tolerances and increase the modules strength and usability .
Cory Fernandez
Component Design & Aggregation New Component Aggregation
.
With smaller scale interaction with aggregation is intimate. The aggregation creates form but is subject to the shape it fills. It is not experienced from within but is experienced through its texture and feel.
The aggragation here is not creating space to interact in but is part of another space. It is bounded by the walls and ceiling of a museum and limits itself for paths. Here it is an object to perceive to move around not within.
This scale is appropriate for human interaction. It forms itself but its shape is subject to its surroundings It creates a canopy over space in which a filtered light passes. Interaction and mood changes with the time of day and amount of sun penetrating the canopy. In a park like setting the aggregation seems to lead you from one place to another making a physical and symbolic link through alternate places throughout the park .
Aggregation in limitless space. The form created is natural and unabiding. It does not conform to any space. At this scale it also seems to make a viable link between the earth and moon. Now it creates spaces and links spaces as well.
Class: Intro to Design II Year: Spring 2009 Project: Cafe project
Cory Fernandez Work Sample
Cutaway Axonometric
Class: Intro to Design II Year: Spring 2009 Project: Battery Park Eco-Center
Cory Fernandez Work Sample
Battery Park Eco-center Plans and Sections
+14’6”
Snack Shop
A Conference Room +23’6” Storage
Work Room Bookstore Laboratory Lobby/ Atrium
B
0’
B
Work Room
Display Area Lobby/ Atrium
Mechanical Room
+13’ 6” +13’ 6”
Library/ Book Storage
Auditorium
+11’
-2’6” 0’
A
FL01
Office
Office
FL02
FL03
Section A
Section B
Office
+32’8”
IT Room Kichenette
FL04
Scale 1/8” = 1’0”
Class: Modes of Communication Year: Spring 2009 Project: Milam House Case Study (Competition Winner)
Cory Fernandez Work Sample
N
A
A
Frontt Entran E ance
Rooff Ter errace ace Level L vel
Grou ound d Level L vel
Second Se d Level L vel Mid-L M d-Level vel Conve nversation n Area Basement ement LLevel vel
Side Entran E ance Back EEntran ance Mid-l d-level vel FFire replace ace Sitting Si g Area
Circulation Diagram Cory Fernandez Modes Of Design Communication II Instructor: Michael Chen Spring 2009
Exploded View
Level Diagram
Milam House Designed By Paul Rudolph 1962
Class: Studio I Year: Fall 2009 Project:Gwathmey House Case Study
Cory Fernandez Work Sample
Gwathmey Residence and Studio Architect :Charles Gwathmey Student: Cory Fernandez Instructor: Julio Figueroa
Gwathmey Residence and Studio Charles Gwathmey Amaganaset NY, 1967 Volumes are of pure forms inspired by Le Corbusier’s idea of prisme pur. Gwathmey applies a subtractive process of these pure forms to reveal the buildings final form
Volumetric Massing
Gwathmey Residence and Studio Charles Gwathmey Amaganaset NY, 1967
Building is designed around a 4 foot center line grid. Final dimensions of structure fits in a 40’ x 32’ rectangle
Residence Geometry
Gwathmey Residence and Studio Charles Gwathmey Amaganaset NY, 1967
Upper Level Master Bedroom Master Bathroom
Living Level Dining Room Kitchen Living Room
Ground Level Guest Bedrooms Bathroom Mechanical Room Study
Residence Program
Gwathmey Residence and Studio Charles Gwathmey Amaganaset NY, 1967
Public
Private
Residence Public vs Private
Gwathmey Residence and Studio Charles Gwathmey Amaganaset NY, 1967
Residence Circulation
Gwathmey Residence and Studio Charles Gwathmey Amaganaset NY, 1967
Resident Section 1
Gwathmey Residence and Studio Charles Gwathmey Amaganaset NY, 1967
Site Geometry
Gwathmey Residence and Studio Charles Gwathmey Amaganaset NY, 1967
Site Circulation
Gwathmey Residence and Studio Charles Gwathmey Amaganaset NY, 1967 Elements Include: 5/8” Plywood Diaphram 1”x 6” Cedar Tounge and Groove Siding 2”x 6” Lumber Framing for Walls 2”x 10” Lumber for Floor Joist and Roof 5/8” Plywood for Sub Floors
Elements
Gwathmey Residence and Studio Charles Gwathmey Amaganaset NY, 1967 Cory Fernandez
Residence Structure
Gwathmey Residence and Studio Charles Gwathmey Amaganaset NY, 1967 Cory Fernandez
Residence Structure
Class: Building Systems Year: Fall 2009 Project: Wall Section
Cory Fernandez Work Sample
Storm King Welcome Center Wall Section Aluminum roof assembly Roof pitch 2” rise on 12” run Rolled ice and water shield/vapor barrier applied to entire roof surface for low pitch roof protection 5/8“ CDX plywood sheathing with typical nailing on roof. Continuous aluminum drip edge at fascia edge 3/4” pre-primed pine fascia 1/2” pine continuous vented soffit
Building Systems 225 Cory Fernandez Scale: 1-1/2” = 1’0” December 06, 2009 Studio Instructor: Julio Figueroa 1-1/2” airspace for ventilation above roof insulation
R-30 faced batt insulation 5/8” gypsum wall board ceiling
3/4” pine pre-primed freezeboard 2” x 12“ dimensional lumber roof rafters spaced 24” o.c
Continuous 2“x6” double top plate ship lapped at corners
1’0“ roof overhang
5/8” gypsum wallboard interior wall finish
5/4“ air space
2”x6” spaced 24” o.c. dimensional lumber framed walls
Tyvek air barrier stapled to sheathing with taped seams. 5/4” furring strips spaced 24” o.c even with wall studs
Wall Height is 10’ from sub floor to top of top plate
5/8“ CDX plywood sheathing with typical nailing
5/8” tongue and groove cedar clapboard rainsrceen assembly
R-19 faced, for vapor barrier, batted insulation inside wall cavity 3/4” plywood subfloor glued and screwed (typical)
2“x6” continous sole plate 2”x12” dimensional lumber floor joist Aluminum termite shield Grade soil to begin a min. of 8“ below top of foundation wall. Grade sloped a min of 5% away from foundation wall
2”x12” dimensional lumber ribbon joist 2” rigid foam insulation on interior of ribbon joist 2”x6” continuous pressure treated sill plate 1/2“ sill insulation/ sill seal 5/8’ od sill bolt 6’ oc
2” rigid foam insulation Spray applied dampproofing
8” hollow core CMU masonry block with 3/8” joints for foundation wall with horizontal and vertical reinforcement. Filled solid with 4500 psi concrete. Foundation wall min. of 56” height for a min of 8” above grade and 4’ of substructure to get below New York region frostline.
4” reinforced conrcete slab
Filter fabricaround drain tile Gravel backfill around drain drain pipe 4” od perforated drain pipe 4” cant strip at base of foundation wall
6 mil vapor barrier Min. of 2” of sand Min. of 4’ of gravel 2“ x 3” key 5/8” or #5 rebar for footing reinforcement Poured concrete continuous footing with top being 4’ below grade. Footing 16” wide by 12” deep.