Work Sample

Page 1

Cory Fernandez Work Sample Fall 2010


Class: Studio I Year: Fall 2009 Project:Storm King Artist In Residence

Cory Fernandez Work Sample


Storm King Art Center Artist In Residence Student : Cory Fernandez Instructor: Julio Figueroa

Wood My design concept for the artist in residence at the Storm King Art Center began with lookin at two things. One, the building material that would be used for the design, wood, and also the context of the surrounding site. Wood provides a connection with the surrounding nature and I wanted my structure to celebrate wood as a material. What I found most interesting about wood is that it grows from the core out, in layers. With this idea I began to form a concept that could be used as an architectural concept that my stucture like wood can also grow from the core out.

Sculptures When Looking at the stucture at Storm King art center I most appreciated the ones that fit the best contextually with the park. These were Andy Goldsworthy’s “Storm King Wall,” Maya Lin’s “Wave Field” and Richard Serra’s Shunnemunk Fork. I found that what related these sculptures most to the landscape was that they emerged from the lanscape at an angle rather than jutting straight out or being placed on top. This concept coincided with my interset in the way a tree grow in that it was as if the sculpture grew from the ground.

Circulation The circulaion is divided into two essential paths. A private path and a public path. The public path is meant to bring people through each density of the building, building up an anxiety and a desire to reach the core of the building. Throughout the path to the core of the building views to the central sculpture garden are there but are disturbed by the structure of the building or the trees in the sculpture garden. A feeling of relief should be present when one reaches the core of the structure. The private path is very direct and allow the artist to reach sculpture garden and studio from the residence.

Program Shop Welcome Center Studio Workspace Sculpture Garden/ Exterior Exhibit Living Room Bathroom Kitchen Bedroom

Public vs Private Public Private The public and private sectors of the buliding are mainly seperated by the axis of symmetry of the grid system with the public side being closest to the public road and the private side being closest to the private road. This idea of seperating the public and private sectors helped with choosin a site location for the building, being placed where thw public and private roads are most closely pinched together

Elements The compents that compose the structure are - 4”x12” Gluelam engineered lumber for vertical support -2”x12” wood dimensional framing - curtain wall assembly -cmu foundation walls -plywood floor decking and roof sheathing - aluminum rolled roofing -2”x4” wood batons as facade louvers

Section A Scale 1/8”= 1’0”


Storm King Art Center Artist In Residence Student : Cory Fernandez Instructor: Julio Figueroa

Section A

Studio Workspace Up

Welcome Center

Shop

Up Up

Exterior Exhibit

Living Room Section B

Up

Section B

Kitchen

Bedroom

Section A

N 0’

5’

25’

50’

Ground Floor Plan Scale 1/8”=1’0”

Section B Scale 1/8”= 1’0”


Class: Studio I Year: Fall 2009 Project: Urban Nexus on the NYC Highline

Cory Fernandez Work Sample


The Highline

Cory Fernandez Urban Nexus Studio: Julio Figueroa

Folding

Folding 2

Folding 3

Circulation Lifting

Extruding

1 2 3 4 5

6

7

+

Old Geometry

8

9 10 ll - Density

New Geometry Section 2

Section 1 DN

Section 1 Scale 1/8” = 1’ 0”


Cory Fernandez Urban Nexus Studio: Julio Figueroa

The Highline

+ 6”

UP

Plan Ground Level Scale 1/8” =1’0”

+8’ 5.27”

+ 6”

UP

+ 21’

UP

UP +4’ 5.67”

+12’ 4.87”

UP

UP

+16’ 4.47”

UP UP

UP

+ 21’ UP

UP

UP

+24’ 11.5”

Plan Highline Level Scale 1/8” =1’0”


Class: Studio II Year: Spring 2010 Project: Jersey City Boys and Girls Club (Competition Winner)

Cory Fernandez Work Sample


Jersey City Boys and Girls Club Site

Site Plan

Floor Plan

Sitting Areas

Green Lounge Areas

Spectacle Seating

Program Gym Classrooms Theatre

Program

Greenspace

Seating

Site Circulation

Staff Public Entry Changing/Locker rooms

Process Circulation

Activities Per Time of Day Shadow Study

= 100% Aperture

Swimming Classroom Learning Most Circulation

= 40% Aperture

Reading

= 30% Aperture

Mock Up

= 20% Aperture = 15% Aperture

Drawing One on One Mentoring Arts and Crafts Staff Work

Approach from Nearest Schools

Listen to Music

= 12% Aperture

Eating Play Instruments

= 8% Aperture

Inside Sports

= 5% Aperture = 0 % Aperture 6am

Watching Movies Large Assemblies/ Lectures Loading Unloading Supplies 7am

8am

9am

10am

11am

12 pm

1pm

2pm

4pm

3pm

5pm

6pm

7pm

8pm

9pm

Tectonic Application Program Layout

Gym 10,000 sq ft

Shower 180 sq ft

Mentoring Room 140 sq ft

Mentoring Room 140 sq ft

Shower 180 sq ft

Directors Office 180 sq ft

Changing Room 500 sq ft

Staff room 420 sq ft

Changing Room 500 sq ft

Public Entry Space 1000

ClassRoom 1200 sq ft

ClassRoom 1200 sq ft

ClassRoom 1200 sq ft ClassRoom 1200 sq ft

View Points from Approach

Aperture Gradient

Program Gradient

10pm

11pm


Class: Studio II Year: Spring 2010 Project: Masonry Build Competition (Competition Winner: Best Mock-up)

Cory Fernandez Work Sample



Masonry Build: Digital mockup


Masonry Build: Physical models




Class: Studio II Year: Spring 2010 Project: Brick Wall Development (Continuation of Wall Development for NJIT Idea Factory proposal)

Cory Fernandez Work Sample


Digitalize

Industrialize Conceptualize

Materialize


Egg Crate


PREASSEMBLY



Step 4

Step 3

Step 2

Step 1

Step 5


D E F G H I H G F E D C B A B C D E F G H I H G F E D C B A B C D

30 29 28 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 09 08 07 06 05 04 03 02 01 X0 X1 X2

Reflect

Reflect

Reflect

Reflect


R 09 25

Q 08 10 24 26

I 09 25

H 08 10 24 26

P 07 11 23 27

G 07 11 23 27

O 06 12 22 28

F 06 12 22 28

N 05 13 21

E 05 13 21 29

M 04 14 20

D X2 04 14 20 30

L 03 15 19

C X1 03 15 19

K

02 16 18

J 01 17

B X0 02 16 18

A 01 17


. .. ..

. .. ....

.. .. .. ..

.. ... . ..

...

Laying Template

...

Removing Template

. ... .. ..

...

.. .. .. ..

.. ... . ..

.. ... ..

.. .. .. ..

. .. ..

.. ... ..

. .. ..

Story Polls

Laying Brick











Brick Rainscreen Assembly

Steel Framing support

Curtain Wall Assembly








Class: Aggregated Assemblies Year: Summer 2010 Project: Component Design

Cory Fernandez Work Sample


Cory Fernandez

Component Design & Aggregation

Solid Geometry In this phase I picked a known solid geometry ,the tetrahedron. By understanding the configuration and angles of the shape I was able to build a Grasshopper definition based on points, lines, and planes.

Tetrahedron

Aggregated Assemblies


Cory Fernandez

Component Design & Aggregation

Geometry Alteration In this phase tried to understand how the tetrahedron attached to itself.

Realizing the tetrahedron has a very limited face to face connection I altered the shape by truncating the points. This created three new faces making the unit have seven faces instead of four. This allowed for more aggregation oppurtunities

Tetrahedron

Aggregated Assemblies


Cory Fernandez

Component Design & Aggregation

Aggregations This comparison shows how the original tetrahedron tends to aggregate vs the new irregular tetrahedron’s tendency to aggregate.

Tetrahedron

Aggregated Assemblies


Cory Fernandez

Component Design & Aggregation

Perspective This perspectival view describes some of the spaces that occur inside and around the new truncated tetrahedron.

Tetrahedron

Aggregated Assemblies


Cory Fernandez

Common Piece

Locking Piece

Component Design & Aggregation

Fabrication Idea 3 This new component uses a series of different joints. Two different pieces a common piece and a locking piece are used to form the component. The unit will rely on friction and the plasticity of the plywood to hold together. Plan

Section

Tetrahedron

Aggregated Assemblies


Cory Fernandez

Component Design & Aggregation New Component Fabrication Process

This diagram shows how the unit is to be assembled. First two common pieces are fitted together. Then the third must slide into the one and rotate into the other slot. Here the material will be deformed slightly but its resistance to deformation will create the friction needed to hold the parts together.

Step 1

Exploded View

Step 2

Lastly the three unit are locked together by the locking piece.

Step 3

Tetrahedron

Aggregated Assemblies


Cory Fernandez

Component Design & Aggregation New Component Aggregation

The unit will be able to receive other components from 4 different faces. Notches are used to create friction to hold the units together. One uni is composed of two face types. One where all three common pieces meet. And the other where two common and one locking piece meet.

Tetrahedron

Aggregated Assemblies


Cory Fernandez

Component Design & Aggregation Fabrication 2

In the second batch micro adjustments were made to allow for tolerances and increase the modules strength and usability .


Cory Fernandez

Component Design & Aggregation New Component Aggregation

.


With smaller scale interaction with aggregation is intimate. The aggregation creates form but is subject to the shape it fills. It is not experienced from within but is experienced through its texture and feel.


The aggragation here is not creating space to interact in but is part of another space. It is bounded by the walls and ceiling of a museum and limits itself for paths. Here it is an object to perceive to move around not within.


This scale is appropriate for human interaction. It forms itself but its shape is subject to its surroundings It creates a canopy over space in which a filtered light passes. Interaction and mood changes with the time of day and amount of sun penetrating the canopy. In a park like setting the aggregation seems to lead you from one place to another making a physical and symbolic link through alternate places throughout the park .


Aggregation in limitless space. The form created is natural and unabiding. It does not conform to any space. At this scale it also seems to make a viable link between the earth and moon. Now it creates spaces and links spaces as well.


Class: Intro to Design II Year: Spring 2009 Project: Cafe project

Cory Fernandez Work Sample





Cutaway Axonometric


Class: Intro to Design II Year: Spring 2009 Project: Battery Park Eco-Center

Cory Fernandez Work Sample


Battery Park Eco-center Plans and Sections

+14’6”

Snack Shop

A Conference Room +23’6” Storage

Work Room Bookstore Laboratory Lobby/ Atrium

B

0’

B

Work Room

Display Area Lobby/ Atrium

Mechanical Room

+13’ 6” +13’ 6”

Library/ Book Storage

Auditorium

+11’

-2’6” 0’

A

FL01

Office

Office

FL02

FL03

Section A

Section B

Office

+32’8”

IT Room Kichenette

FL04

Scale 1/8” = 1’0”


Class: Modes of Communication Year: Spring 2009 Project: Milam House Case Study (Competition Winner)

Cory Fernandez Work Sample


N

A

A

Frontt Entran E ance

Rooff Ter errace ace Level L vel

Grou ound d Level L vel

Second Se d Level L vel Mid-L M d-Level vel Conve nversation n Area Basement ement LLevel vel

Side Entran E ance Back EEntran ance Mid-l d-level vel FFire replace ace Sitting Si g Area

Circulation Diagram Cory Fernandez Modes Of Design Communication II Instructor: Michael Chen Spring 2009

Exploded View

Level Diagram

Milam House Designed By Paul Rudolph 1962


Class: Studio I Year: Fall 2009 Project:Gwathmey House Case Study

Cory Fernandez Work Sample


Gwathmey Residence and Studio Architect :Charles Gwathmey Student: Cory Fernandez Instructor: Julio Figueroa


Gwathmey Residence and Studio Charles Gwathmey Amaganaset NY, 1967 Volumes are of pure forms inspired by Le Corbusier’s idea of prisme pur. Gwathmey applies a subtractive process of these pure forms to reveal the buildings final form

Volumetric Massing


Gwathmey Residence and Studio Charles Gwathmey Amaganaset NY, 1967

Building is designed around a 4 foot center line grid. Final dimensions of structure fits in a 40’ x 32’ rectangle

Residence Geometry


Gwathmey Residence and Studio Charles Gwathmey Amaganaset NY, 1967

Upper Level Master Bedroom Master Bathroom

Living Level Dining Room Kitchen Living Room

Ground Level Guest Bedrooms Bathroom Mechanical Room Study

Residence Program


Gwathmey Residence and Studio Charles Gwathmey Amaganaset NY, 1967

Public

Private

Residence Public vs Private


Gwathmey Residence and Studio Charles Gwathmey Amaganaset NY, 1967

Residence Circulation


Gwathmey Residence and Studio Charles Gwathmey Amaganaset NY, 1967

Resident Section 1


Gwathmey Residence and Studio Charles Gwathmey Amaganaset NY, 1967

Site Geometry


Gwathmey Residence and Studio Charles Gwathmey Amaganaset NY, 1967

Site Circulation


Gwathmey Residence and Studio Charles Gwathmey Amaganaset NY, 1967 Elements Include: 5/8” Plywood Diaphram 1”x 6” Cedar Tounge and Groove Siding 2”x 6” Lumber Framing for Walls 2”x 10” Lumber for Floor Joist and Roof 5/8” Plywood for Sub Floors

Elements


Gwathmey Residence and Studio Charles Gwathmey Amaganaset NY, 1967 Cory Fernandez

Residence Structure


Gwathmey Residence and Studio Charles Gwathmey Amaganaset NY, 1967 Cory Fernandez

Residence Structure


Class: Building Systems Year: Fall 2009 Project: Wall Section

Cory Fernandez Work Sample


Storm King Welcome Center Wall Section Aluminum roof assembly Roof pitch 2” rise on 12” run Rolled ice and water shield/vapor barrier applied to entire roof surface for low pitch roof protection 5/8“ CDX plywood sheathing with typical nailing on roof. Continuous aluminum drip edge at fascia edge 3/4” pre-primed pine fascia 1/2” pine continuous vented soffit

Building Systems 225 Cory Fernandez Scale: 1-1/2” = 1’0” December 06, 2009 Studio Instructor: Julio Figueroa 1-1/2” airspace for ventilation above roof insulation

R-30 faced batt insulation 5/8” gypsum wall board ceiling

3/4” pine pre-primed freezeboard 2” x 12“ dimensional lumber roof rafters spaced 24” o.c

Continuous 2“x6” double top plate ship lapped at corners

1’0“ roof overhang

5/8” gypsum wallboard interior wall finish

5/4“ air space

2”x6” spaced 24” o.c. dimensional lumber framed walls

Tyvek air barrier stapled to sheathing with taped seams. 5/4” furring strips spaced 24” o.c even with wall studs

Wall Height is 10’ from sub floor to top of top plate

5/8“ CDX plywood sheathing with typical nailing

5/8” tongue and groove cedar clapboard rainsrceen assembly

R-19 faced, for vapor barrier, batted insulation inside wall cavity 3/4” plywood subfloor glued and screwed (typical)

2“x6” continous sole plate 2”x12” dimensional lumber floor joist Aluminum termite shield Grade soil to begin a min. of 8“ below top of foundation wall. Grade sloped a min of 5% away from foundation wall

2”x12” dimensional lumber ribbon joist 2” rigid foam insulation on interior of ribbon joist 2”x6” continuous pressure treated sill plate 1/2“ sill insulation/ sill seal 5/8’ od sill bolt 6’ oc

2” rigid foam insulation Spray applied dampproofing

8” hollow core CMU masonry block with 3/8” joints for foundation wall with horizontal and vertical reinforcement. Filled solid with 4500 psi concrete. Foundation wall min. of 56” height for a min of 8” above grade and 4’ of substructure to get below New York region frostline.

4” reinforced conrcete slab

Filter fabricaround drain tile Gravel backfill around drain drain pipe 4” od perforated drain pipe 4” cant strip at base of foundation wall

6 mil vapor barrier Min. of 2” of sand Min. of 4’ of gravel 2“ x 3” key 5/8” or #5 rebar for footing reinforcement Poured concrete continuous footing with top being 4’ below grade. Footing 16” wide by 12” deep.


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.