Jurisdiction

ORIGINAL TEXT ASSUME THE FOLLOWING The United States is bankrupt and has been since 1933. The government has no gold or silver as required by the Constitution. The only asset left is the people. So how does the U.S. finance daily operations? Solution; collateralize people for credit. How? By registering them in international commerce, and selling bonds on them. The people become the surety on the bonds, or the "pledge".

The asset bonded (surety) is the "energy" or the labor of the people which is payable at some undetermined future date. Thus, the people become the "utility" for the "transmission" of energy.

Result, a very sophisticated form of peonage and the Constitution does not apply because the government, on all levels, is thrown into international commerce, the law merchant, now known as the Uniform Commercial Code. [See Public Law 88 -- 244 in which the U.S. subscribed to private international law. See definition of "goods" under the UCC at 2 -- 105 (1) and 9-- 105 (1) in which animals, i.e. -- humans and their unborn offspring, become "goods" sellable in commerce.]

When a baby is born in the United States, a birth certificate is registered with the Bureau of Vital Statistics in the state of birth. The keyword here it is "registered"; as in, registered in international commerce. The baby becomes the surety, whose energy is due at some future date. When the Birth Certificate is registered in the U.S. Department a Commerce, the Department of Treasury issues a bond on the Birth Certificate and the bond is sold at some securities exchange and perhaps bought by the Federal Reserve Bank at the Deposit Trust Corp. at 55 Water Street, in New York City, about two blocks down the street from the Fed. It is a high-rise office building and the sign out front reads: "The Tower of Power".

When the Birth Certificate is registered, a separate legal entity is created; a mirror image of the real flesh and blood. This separate entity, or alter ego (THE ALL CAPITAL LETTER NAME) is the "straw man" (See Blacks sixth edition dictionary). And it is the “accommodation party” of UCC 3 -415. The name is credit. (see Blacks 6th. “Accommodation party”). Therefore the right (or the use) has been separated from the title (or deed). The “"straw man” holds the title (he belongs to the government's client who bought the bond/title) and the flesh and blood man has only naked possession with the limited “right” to use the thing (like his body or his alleged possessions and land, which now becomes “usury” of another title/property). Maybe that's why our civil rights suits get dismissed outof-court on Civil Rule 12 (B.) (6) Motions. These Motions deal with the "failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted". A claim is another word for "title". So we have "failed to state a title upon which relief can be granted". We do not own the "title" even to our own bodies anymore.

When the straw-man violates some rule or statute (for instance a traffic ticket), the flesh and blood man must appear at the arraignment and admit the straw-man's name (credit). The “energy” on the surety is due and payable by the flesh and blood man who is in use [usury] of the straw man. This is why it is so important to "voluntarily give" your name to the magistrate. The defendant is the strawman. The flesh and blood man is the “offender”. An “offender” is on the offensive team until he screws up and goes on the defensive with the defendant and loses.

So if this scenario is correct, how does one get back the bond that has been sold on the Birth Certificate? And then how does one get in control of his body and his property?

Dear John, Pursuant to our conversation of a few days ago, you ask me to put together some information for you about birth certificate registration under the Uniform Commercial Code. By definition in the law, registration is different and separate from official notice. Notice is to notify of intent or action (past, present or future) or it is simply information. Providing notice is to place a record to officials or to other people of your sovereign actions or intent. Registration means to enroll or to insert in an official registrar, “to become part of”. (Blacks Law) If you read about land registration in Black's Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition, it clearly states that “registration” petitions the court for a “certificate” of title. (Warranty deed not Land Patent). A “certificate of title” is not the title; it certifies that a title exists. Therefore, who still holds the title? Since you petitioned someone, it is with whomever you petitioned.

The same occurs with the registering of a birth certificate. It certifies that a title to your body and its abilities, exist. Where? Well, it probably was with Mom and Dad; or better yet, since in times past births were simply written into a copy of Yahweh's Scriptures; maybe people belonged to him.

However, since Mom and Dad make application to the State for the birth-certificate, Mom and Dad are (by their own admission) saying that the State has title to the child. They have voluntarily registered their child (that the Father gave to them) With the State. Mom and Dad have actually requested that the State certify what they {mom and dad} have done this by placing a "certificate of live birth” on the State’s public registry at Vital Statistics. And then, Mom and Dad petition the State to give them a copy of said certificate, so that they know and have record of what they have done.

The words: REGISTER, REGISTRATION, CERTIFICATE, CERTIFY, BIRTH, BERTH, CHATTEL, PROPERTY, and all other “legal meanings” are published within the legal/law dictionaries, the “statutes”, and the “codes” for the entire population to read, study, review, and learn.

But, do the people read and study? Edmund Burke wrote of the colonists in 1765. He remarked that the average colonists were reading at a seventeenth grade level and that they studied THE LAW vigorously. In fact, the records of England show, that there were more copies of BLACKSTONE’S LAW DICTIONARY sold in the colonies in 1765 than in England, itself. (Understand the population of London, alone was double that of the colonies in that year.)

So, what of the people, today? Scripture says that people are destroyed for “lack of knowledge”.

IsraEl was even told that: “they destroyed themselves by their own hand”. Has this process changed?

Unfortunately for the child, the parents, and society; THE STATE has not hidden the meanings of this birth registration process from anyone. They have done the same thing that Adolph Hitler did in Germany, when he said: ”Bring me your children and I will train them”. [i.e. “register them with me: the State, and give me the control of the children.]

To put this in terms of personal experience, upon learning this information I got a copy of my registered birth certificate from my state of birth. (These are kept in a high security Vault). I compared this with the original that was given to me years ago. They were different documents. The one from Vital Statistics was on different paper. It was green in color, and it had serial numbers at the top. Where there had been typed-in-names of the public official; there were now signatures.

My wife, whose son was born in the same state as I; went to get a copy of her son's birth certificate.

She came back to the car and looked at the document; then returned to the building to ask for a true and certified copy from the vault. They brought out a different document, entirely. Ask yourself, what is so VITAL about these records? Births were previously recorded in Bibles and set out on a

coffee table for all to see. What is being protected, here? Is it your so-called PRIVACY (which you no longer have anyway)? Think again.

I also had a friend, who called his “state” of birth and requested a true and certified copy of the front and back of his birth certificate. He was told that he could not be provided with the confidential information on the back of his birth certificate. (What information?). Furious at this response, he took his request two steps up their “chain of command” to find an answer to this remark. The supervisor of the Department of Vital Statistics in New York asked him if he was "trying to get someone fired".

John, you and I became friends sometime back and are of like mind in a lot of our beliefs. The Father Yahweh revealed to me to get out of America quite some time ago. I believe I was ahead for several reasons. One was to provide financial vehicles and safe high-yield opportunities for fellow believers to be able to move assets into other locations. The other was to seek out and prepare places (i.e. farms, communities etc.) to which people can move during the coming months and years as we start to witness the future "exodus" from the U.S. In the days of the Caesar's, slavery to the Empire was known by tax policy. The enforcement of taxes by the tax collector was a mere 10 percent. The tax on tea that was placed by Parliament (not a King of England) was only 1/2% to 1%. And just look at what resulted. This government today; perpetuates mass fraud on the people, and people just accept it. They do it with a form of fake/fraud “money” called “Notes” (see the words: MONEY and NOTE in Black’s Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition). They use these made-up-certificates to create a “chattel mortgage” so that they can sell people as “chattel” to fund their operations. At least 2000 years ago the people knew what slavery was.

But, there are always a few who see it early and prepare (just like those who left Rome before it unraveled or the Jews, who didn't turn a blind eye to the schemes of Adolf Hitler). Proverbs 22:3 "A prudent man forsees the evil and takes refuge, but the simple keep going and suffer for it."

Also, the people knew what jurisdiction meant. Our Messiah knew jurisdiction. He went before their courts, made no pleas; but instead, challenged the jurisdiction and was found to be innocent. Our Messiah never gave them jurisdiction over his personal body and life.

I say these things because I know that there are SUPPOSED “Constitutional experts” who will claim that the Constitution is in effect and this UCC “stuff” is bogus. Well, I agree that the Constitution is still in effect. In fact, the articles of Confederation are still in effect. The Northwest Ordinance and many other Treaties/Contracts are still in effect. Nothing is ever removed from the books because it would violate TREATY LAW and the LAW OF NATIONS; as mentioned in the Constitution.

But, the point is, do they apply to you!! If you think these claims about the Uniform Commercial Code are bogus, then pullout a checkbook from any bank and look at the deposit slip. You will find the words: "All checks or other items are received for deposit subject to the PROVISIONS of the UCC and any APPLICABLE Bank collection agreements".

Did you read the provisions? Did you read the "applicable bank collection agreement” when you made application to the bank, and signed the bank signature card?

Since you made application/contract, the bank became the grantor of the account and you are the grantee. Did you read the Uniform Commercial Code? IF NOT, then how can you possibly understand and defend your contract? People gripe and complain, but do they read?

So whose bank account is it? People will say: “that’s my bank account”. Did you assign the number or did they? And every time you use the account (by check, draft, or deposit) you reaffirm the commitment/covenant by a double witness with that all capital letter name at the top and the Bank's all-capital-letter name at the bottom. They do everything with your full approval. They get your signature as the surety, and then they create the "money" out of thin air. People will even give them their real property, but the Bank never goes to get any “money” out of their vault. Why not? Because they cannot loan “depositors” assets, nor can they loan their own “assets”. They get your living, fleshand-blood-signature on a NOTE, and then they create the money. This is then loaned to the STRAWMAN; ALL-UPPER-CASE FICTION CORPORATION, that has a name similar to yours.

Did you know this? These facts are published in the Federal Reserve Bank’s manual called MODERN MONEY MECHANICS. Once again, they are not hiding the information. Remember: CONTRACT -- COVENANT-- i.e. JURISDICTION! Let's look at the right to travel. You once had the right to travel freely until you registered yourself into interstate commerce with the Department of Motor Vehicles. You signed an application/contract and paid them a valuable consideration to license you and regulate your travel activities. All of the state traffic codes are based on the word "use", which is commercial.

So now, you don't travel -- you drive or are considered a driver instead of a traveler. You don't have guests in your car -- you have passengers in your motor vehicle. And, you are not traveling upon the “free”ways -- you are “using” (participating in usury) of the highways and roads. From a judicial perspective, they really do not understand why you protest so much against the Executive Branch enforcing their policies and regulating you, when you are the one who gave them approval, and then required that they do so by paying the fee to them for their regulation. It is all about jurisdiction, and people do not know jurisdiction or know how to defend it.

And, what about income taxes? First of all, you are supposed to have rights preventing selfincrimination, which is where the income tax system in the U.S. is entirely based. It is a system of total self-assessment and self-incrimination. They use your time and energy to fill out forms for them, and then penalize you if one of their “agents” thinks that you are wrong. Of course, studies have shown that talking to 10 different agents, will get you ten different opinions; so they don't understand the system either.

But getting differing opinions on the system and its accounting doesn't matter; because it's your “money” or “assets” that they are after, right? Instead of giving you my opinion, let's look at what others had to say.

-- "You are among the millions of Americans who comply with the tax law voluntarily." -- 1992 forms and 1040 Instruction Book, p. 3 -- "Who would believe the ironic truth that the cooperative taxpayer fares much worse than the individual who relies upon his constitutional rights." -- Federal Judge Cummings in U.S. vs.

Dickerson, 413 F. Second district 1117 (1969) -- "The income taxes are unconstitutional and was not part of the original intent of those who drafted our Constitution or government. I am supporting a resolution to repeal the sixteenth amendment.

-Steve Symms, former member U.S. Congress -- "The United States has a system of taxation by confession." -- Justice Hugo Black in U.S. vs.

Kahriger, 345 U.S. 22 -- "Only the rare taxpayer would be likely to know that he could refuse to produce his records to IRS agents." -- U.S. vs. Dickerson 413 F.2d

-- "To lay with one hand the power of the government on the property of the citizens, and with the other to bestow it on favored individuals...is none the less robbery because it is done under the forms of law and is called taxation." -- U.S. Supreme Court in Loan Association vs. Topeka 1874 -- "In a recent conversation with an official of the IRS, I was amazed when he told me that, 'If the taxpayers of this country ever discover that the IRS operates on 90% bluff, the entire system will collapse'." -- Sen. Henry Bellmon(1969) -- "Because of what appears to be a lawful command on the surface, many citizens, because of their respect for what only appears to be law, are cunningly coerced into waving their rights due to ignorance." -- U.S. Supreme Court in U.S. vs. Minker, 350 U.S. 179,187 -- "Lenin prophesied that the United States would spend itself to destruction. Toward that end this graduated income tax was the first essential step." -- The Law and The Profits, N. C. Parkinson (1960) -- "None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free." -- Johann W. von Goeth (1749 -- 1832) -- "He who knows nothing is nearer to the truth than he who's mind is filled with falsehoods and errors." -- Thomas Jefferson The truth is that taxes are nothing more than a repayment on the investment of bonds. These bonds are created by the pledges (i.e. BIRTH CERTIFICATES ON THE CHATTEL) of the people. It is the people who are the full faith and credit of America, which have been sold by the United States corporate government and bought by the Federal Reserve, the World Bank, the IMF, the international bankers, -- i.e. The One World Government. Once again, if we go back to THE SCRIPTURES and read; we will find out the truth of these days. These things were foretold long ago. THE SCRIPTURES clearly foretell that in the final-days: “They do nothing in the last days but buy and sell the souls of men."

Our Creator gave rights -- not a Constitution. (And, even that Constitution gives “the UNLIMITED RIGHT TO CONTRACT”.)

BUT, He (Yahweh the creator) also gave the "right" to CONTRACT all of one’s "rights" away. The decision belongs to the people, as individuals. We have free choice to participate in any contract that we wish. And, if that contract has not been explained, then it is our responsibility to “express the matter”. It is an old MAXIM of the LAW, that a matter “must be expressed to be resolved”. This does not include whining, griping, and complaining. That is not sufficient to get to a resolution.

Did the "constitutional attorneys or experts" tell you that? Did they tell you what the words: attorney and attornment mean? Is there a difference between a lawyer and an attorney who practices "attornment"? Did they tell you that attorneys are Esquire's – which is a title of nobility? Title of nobility! -- Does this mean under the CROWN? How many times have you heard that attorneys are really officers of the court? Where did that originate? [See: MEMORANDUM OF LAW ON THE BAR ASSOCIATION] -- -- “The Attorney is an Officer of the Court. His first duty is to the courts and the public not to his client.” -- 7 Corpus Juris Secundum, #4, page 802 -- -Whose court is it, anyway? And why is there gold trim around what is supposed to be a three-colored flag? [See: USC: Title: 4 Sections: 1,2,3] Look! An attorney cannot bring you protection under the Constitution, because Articles 1 and 13 state “no Titles of Nobility”. Think about these things deeply the next time that you sign a covenant to allow someone else to practice attornment on you, or strike hands (i.e. sign a form/contract) to be a surety and “pledge” your property or “pledge allegiance” to something like a flag. Know what the something is. You are to know what it actually means, and not what you presume it to mean?

Know your jurisdiction, whether it's the Uniform Commercial Code, the IRS Code, the Traffic Code, the Constitution, the Articles of Confederation, British Common Law, or Maritime/Merchant Law. The highest form of law is Contract Law, which is what you sign, what you submit to, what you agree with, and those things To which you SWEAR “under the penalty of purjury" . In other words, this will be the way in which you live. If you live by Supreme Law, by YHWH's Contract/Covenant Law, you will understand that there really is only one Lawgiver. Psalm 94:20 explains it this way: “the Evil-oness frame their mischief by changing statues and decrees” - i.e. “the laws”. Law, i.e. Supreme Law, is constant and unchanging. Man's decrees/codes/statutes are a "throne of iniquity", whose purpose is to "devise evil by decree" - NKJV AND please; stop doing all this swearing in THEIR courts. Swearing is forbidden in Matthew 5:34, and the thing that they get people to swear on, is the very thing that states: “do not swear”. Hint: Let your yes, be yes; and no, be no -- because anything beyond this is from the Evil One.-- Matthew 5:37 Remember this: Scripture tells us that in times past, Yahweh "winked" at our ignorance. But that is in times past. 16 American Jurisprudence states: “ignorance of the law is no excuse.” When the prophet Nathan confronted David with his sin, did not David convict himself? Maybe this is why in Romans 1 it says that “all that stand before Him shall be with out excuse”.

2Timothy 2:15—“study to show yourself approved unto Yahweh, rightly dividing the words of Truth”!

John 8:32 -- “And then, you shall know the truth and the truth shall make you free”. [but, not before you KNOW it. Truth frees no one whose mind is filled with falsehoods, and you are responsible for your own mind.]

I will have more for you later, when I can make the time, because I feel that it is now important to start getting more information out. I have been saying for four years now that Yahweh is calling a remnant of his people back to the truth. He doesn't use all of his people all the time, and some only when they have been refined by fire and are ready. I am now in the position to help a lot of His people. But those who reject knowledge (truth), The Father will reject. Hosea 4:6 Many are called, but few are chosen.

Bless you John for being a warrior! dp