-
Communities First
Cwmtopia Partnership Child Poverty Self-assessment Report 7th February 2011
CONTENTS
Page 2.
Introduction
3.
Methodology
5.
Self Assessment Bulls-eye
6.
Action Points Summary
11.
Workshop Results
25.
Workshop Evaluation
30.
Action points
31.
List of participants
1
Introduction The group undertook a self-assessment exercise on behalf of the CYPP. The focus of the assessment was to assess the partnership’s current approach and ability to act on reducing child poverty and to identify barriers to achieving success. The session, facilitated by Geraldine Murphy from the WLGA Partnership Support Unit and Ross Chamberlain from Save the Children, Child Poverty Solutions, www.childpovertysolutions.org.uk, was very well attended. The agreed aim of the workshop was to develop a shared understanding of the child poverty agenda and draw out ideas from the participants to inform CYPP action planning for child poverty. Workshop presentations are attached at appendix 1. The organisational themes to be self-assessed are set out in the self-assessment tool on the Child Poverty Solutions website. Each theme incorporates 6 questions. The themes are as follows: 1. Leadership and Corporate Governance Leaders have developed a clear vision for Child Poverty and positioned it within corporate/partnership 2. Policy Development The partnership has a clear approach to delivering outcomes relating to child poverty reduction 3. Performance Management The partnership has a culture of performance management in addressing child poverty 4. Partnership Working There are robust partnership arrangements in place to deliver on Child Poverty 5. Capacity & Resource Management Appropriate resources have been consistently matched with Child poverty priorities
2
Methodology 1. Participants were grouped into 5 separate teams 2. Each team started at one of 5 tables. Each table was dedicated to a single theme with a facilitator who stayed at the table for the duration of the exercise. 3. Facilitators were as follows:
Policy Development (Sharn Annette) Leadership and Corporate Governance (Kate Witcomb) Performance Management (Phil Diamond) Partnership Working (Maria Allen) Capacity and Resource Management (Andrew Parker)
2. Each table was provided with a copy of the self assessment questions, set out in a pre prepared matrix, from the relevant theme. Group participants were invited to discuss and record examples of strengths and areas for improvement under each of the 6 questions and agree a final score between 1 and 6 for CYPP performance under each question. Score key 1 = No action taken yet 2 = Intending to develop 3 = Starting to develop 4 = Developing 5 = Developing and embedding 6 = Achieving 3. On completion of the task the group moved onto the next table and set of 6 different questions under another of the 5 themes. The facilitator explained the previous group’s comments and participants we invited to make additional comments. Comments could be added but not deleted. This process continued until all 5 themes had been visited by all 5 groups. 4. Once back at their original table the group’s task was to:
review the strengths and weaknesses, agree a final score and identify a key action point for the partnership with a what, how and who (there should be six action points per theme).
5. A spokesperson gave feedback on the scores and action points.
3
What Next? The report will be considered by Blaenau Gwent Children & Young People’s partnership as part of Children & Young People’s Plan development.
4
Self Assessment Bulls-eye The self assessment bulls-eye uses the final scores agreed by each group to plot the CYPP’s status with regard to it’s organisational ability to act on child poverty. It shows how much progress has been made under each of the themes and which areas are most in need of organisational development. The bulls-eye is an easy reference tool that can also be used to plot organisational progress over time. Use this report as a baseline and after a period of action, say 6 months to a year, simply revisit the questions under each of the 5 themes and honestly score your organisations position. Visit www.childpovertysolutions.org.uk and use the self assessment on line tool to input your new scores and compare the resulting bulls-eye to this baseline.
5
Action Points Summary Action Points - Leadership and Corporate Governance Question What 1 Child poverty on all agendas as a standard item. Awareness raising, bite size for all agencies. From top filtered down to all levels – briefing notes. What do you do? How does it impact on CP? How does CP impact on you? 2 All workers have child poverty included in their inductions. All managers to be expected to demonstrate their impact on child poverty. Training to all workers on CP, same as process for Child Protection. 3 Objectives to be clearly defined. BGCBC to define what child poverty is. Good practice. Community strategy needs to reflect child poverty. But in at all levels. 4 External scrutiny – save the children. Communication. Reference in all documents and strategies. Monthly meeting sheet. 5 Elected member and representatives in organisations to champion child poverty – full training. Collective reporting on child poverty – coordinated approach. Pro-active not reactive. 6 All of the above needs to be embedded for this to take place.
How Low cost or outcomes funding/ save the children?
Who Every Chair of every meeting promoting the agenda item. Voluntary sector network.
6
Action Points – Policy Development Question What 1 Mainstreaming Child Poverty into wider poverty agenda and community strategy
2
Consolidate strengthen Assessment
and Needs
3
Take best practice and get into ‘other groups’
How Overarching, well understand agreement linking child poverty to Community Strategy. In the 1st instance a separate action plan.
Who LSB, key partnerships (CYPP) but ensure that ALL partners know the partnership arrangements and know how they can engage regardless of their legal duty. Get a better feel for As above child poverty in Blaenau Gwent (below a LA level) NEETS, 11 to 25, Consistent approaches Vulnerable Adults etc across partners
Recognise Gaps
4
5
6
Use evaluation techniques Get intention and Communicate All Partners direction understood Community Strategy by staff and citizens Show links to Child Poverty/Poverty agenda Ensure a consistent, Mutli-agency approach All Partners understandable to scrutinising poverty. approach to Use flag system to monitoring. linking thematic agenda to poverty, Making sure people Signposting project All Partners know their entitlement. initiatives, advice and guidance to individual. Ensure understanding at operational level for them to take ownership.
7
Action Points – Performance Management Question What 1 Increase awareness and inclusion of all services in relation to C/P objectives and targets. 2
3
4
5
6
How Who Better mechanism for Public, voluntary communication and statutory. integration of all key services. Signposting. More measures against Wide sharing of data WAG guidance. More local and research indicators. Ensure all projects. Partnership agencies are acknowledged in contributing to C/P objectives. Better communication. One Everyone giving real measurement mechanism. communication to C/P Realise what partners can agenda. Introduction bring to the table and what is of simple out there. measurement mechanisms. Influence operational Awareness of what is structures and resources. working (best (Funding streams) = Time, practice) Recognition action, outcomes. of good working practices. Use of most appropriate organisations with local knowledge. Member’s C/P training. Commitment from Bottom up approach. senior management Commitment from all levels. and members to attend C/P training/workshops Consistency from Core Aim Celebrate success groups. Sharing best more vigorously. practice. Communication.
8
Action Points – Partnership Working Question What 1 Greater awareness of ALL staff of what child poverty is and how their work/service links to the broader strategy/agenda
2
Highlight expectations of their roles and responsibilities in regard to child poverty. To recognise/ identify impact of services on each other.
3
Shared vision promoted by LSB.
4
Greater joint commissioning. Greater understanding of funding opportunities.
5
Appoint child champions.
6
Increase level and effectiveness of joint commissioning/planning/SLA/ value for money.
poverty
How Breakfast meetings – short focussed updates. Lunchtime seminar (monitor attendance /representation) Reduced number of priorities. Existing networks/ communication See above. ‘Workshops’. Service Buddy. LSB Audit – contribution of partners to child poverty. LSB audit. Evidencing contributions. Celebrate success/ achievements. See report on progress. Setting up a joint commissioning group under LSB. Share information. Identify champion (borough/partnership) Including young person with experience of poverty/disadvantage Use existing networks/reporting mechanisms.
Who LSB/Partnership All partner contribution.
Partnership – All partners.
LSB
LSB European Officer Borough/ GAVO/EVAD Youth Service, Participation Officer
Partnership, Joint commissioning group. This group instead of Health Wellbeing Framework.
9
Action Points – Capacity Resource Management Question What 1 Develop a Universal System (Aim) but need to identify at what level in which organisations we can improve and adapt to develop this tool.
2
3
4
5
6
How Identify at what level and who. Draft a Universal system. Consultation. Buy in from top level (not just in Blaenau Gwent as a lot of is Pan Gwent, 5 local authorities involved) Make Councillors Training compulsory. accountable to the Child Poverty Priorities. Build into CYP a joint commissioning and procuring guidelines/ good practice. Establish an office with expertise in CP leading on CP who is coordinating funding bids and priorities. Common assessment This will have framework. Common local resource indicators that are used implications. Need across services to identify cohesion on auditing. outcomes against CP Otherwise no money priorities. for doing anything else. CYP to identify priorities, Tell CYP what we budgets to be applied are doing and why according to priorities. Give (how there views are CYP an understanding of being held). costs. Understanding of what things costs. Training and awareness. Getting perspective from Vulnerable group.
Who Grant recipient bodies GAVO, COOP, EVAD.
10
Workshop Results 1. Leadership and Corporate Governance Leaders have developed a clear vision for Child Poverty and positioned it within corporate/partnership Theme Score 2 There is a level of awareness and understanding of child poverty and its impact on services for children and young people Question Strengths Areas for Improvement L1 Established Board members / partnership – with a volunteers needs high level of – awareness awareness and raised understanding e.g. Need to identify knowledgeable Stan localised pockets of deprivation. Training kept up to date.
Members and top managers regard child poverty as a cross cutting issue and have advocated the contribution their agency has to addressing child poverty and motivated others to engage in reducing child poverty Question Strengths Areas for Improvement L2 Partnerships working More volunteers & with PCSO’s, RCT partners needed / Housing Association, young people. police, PACT Work with SLA’s Meetings schools / health There is a clear vision and objectives for addressing child poverty Question Strengths Areas for Improvement L3 Good co-ordinator in Vision / objectives post. Important – need to be clearly strong staffing identified Financial Induction Partner work NB with youths organisations need some vision to tackle some objectives
Score between 1-6 End Score 3 (3.2) Grp1 Grp2 Grp3 Grp4 Grp5 2 3 4 3 4
Score between 1-6 End Score 3 (3.4)
Grp1 Grp2 Grp3 Grp4 Grp5 3
3
3
3
3
Score between 1-6 End Score 2 (2.4) Grp1 Grp2 Grp3 Grp4 Grp5 2 2 3 3 2
11
Leaders have actively participated within the corporate management arrangements which has resulted in better understanding of child poverty and cross cutting agendas and influencing corporate decision-making Question Strengths Areas for Improvement L4 What are corporate management objectives? – Not sure we understand what the management structure is beyond our immediate partnership Leaders welcome and can demonstrate how internal scrutiny and external challenge has assisted in continuous improvement of the child poverty agenda Question Strengths Areas for Improvement L5 Having a Develop child supportive LA poverty agenda, councillor Monitoring and Evaluation system to track improvement. Leaders have created a culture of collaboration, innovation and cross departmental planning and working to address child poverty Question Strengths Areas for Improvement L6 Some good, positive Need to develop partnerships in place joint working with existing and new School\health partners. \housing\church\ Adult education\ refugee council
Score between 1-6 End Score 3 (2.5)
Grp1 Grp2 Grp3 Grp4 Grp5 1 1 1 1 1
Score between 1-6 End Score 2 Grp1 Grp2 Grp3 Grp4 Grp5 2 3 3 2 4
Score between 1-6 End Score 1 (1.4) Grp1 Grp2 Grp3 Grp4 Grp5 2
2
2
2
4
12
Action Points - Leadership and Corporate Governance Question 1 2
3
4
5
6
What Training for board members and volunteers to raise awareness Involve more young people Involve health services
Visual objectives needs to be clearly communicated to the board Better understanding of management structure for all staff / board / volunteers To set up a monitoring and evaluation system to track improvements Need to develop joined up working with existing and new partners.
How Training officer develops a training programme. Participation training with youth service. Engagement/consultation event to raise awareness and give info Health to be part of partnership board Presentation to the board – include staff
Who Training officer
Presentation / handouts
Chair of partnership board Coordinator to liaise / research Coordinator, Chair – anyone linked to health.
Learn from another organisation / partner to get system in place Involving more of the associations e.g. schools / Health in partnership Board
Youth service Youth service / Partnership Board Comm & coordinator Training Officer
13
2. Policy Development The partnership has a clear approach to delivering outcomes relating to child poverty reduction Theme Score 3 The organisation has clear policies and strategies for the Score between 1-6 reduction of child poverty End Score 3 Question Strengths Areas for Improvement Grp1 Grp2 Grp3 Grp4 Grp5 Po1 6 5 5 5 5 All staff aware of Continual Training / updated policies workshops Agree Training-workshops7 core aims. Yes staff well informed full time. Workshop for part times workers / volunteers. Bring you to speed. Policies, strategies and business plans have been developed utilising the best available evidence from a range of sources Question Strengths Areas for Improvement Po2 Youth forum in Encourage more place young people to join/engage Lounge – youth group / Develop young encouraged to people to join, be attend P/BD active young people – Have their say Access to a wide range of youth Multiple choice provisions surveys – To identify priorities. Credit Union Facilities Under represented or priority groups have been effectively included in the service planning process Question Strengths Areas for Improvement Po3 Actively work with Encourage / community / police Develop / Increase / health / schools / membership of local adult education. tenants/Resident groups (P.Board) Intergenerational activities (share Continue to develop skills, gardening) individuals capacity building / confidence Multi agency to show different working - strong boards / Have LA target wide voice audience. Develop – 1 person from different groups to show BD / Youth forum.
Score between 1-6 End Score 2 Grp1 Grp2 Grp3 Grp4 Grp5 4 4 4 4 4
Score between 1-6 End Score 4 (3.6) Grp1 Grp2 Grp3 Grp4 Grp5 4 4 4 4 4
14
Child poverty is reflected within community planning arrangements and there is a clear line of sight between the Community Plan and Corporate priorities, service objectives and individual objectives Question Strengths Areas for Improvement Po4 Established areas Continual of child poverty in development community, between children / working towards families / providers solutions to tackle More joined up this. working/Right Defined areas if Partners poverty represented. A mechanism to monitor progress on implementing the strategy is in place and there is widespread staff ownership of vision, mission and values Question Strengths Areas for Improvement Po5 Regular Evaluation – Better means “Smart” with of evaluation / staff/partners/volunteers/ effectiveness. case studies/record info/ Staff – digital Training (monitoring evaluation, different methods) Training to capture outcomes. Measure soft outcomes.
Score between 1-6 End Score 2
Grp1 Grp2 Grp3 Grp4 Grp5 4 4 4 4 4
Score between 1-6 End Score 2 Grp1 Grp2 Grp3 Grp4 Grp5 4
5
5
5
The organisation has regularly engaged with the most under- Score between 1-6 represented groups and improved services to them as a End Score 3 (3.4) result Questi Strengths Areas for Grp Grp Grp Grp on Improvement 1 2 3 4 Po6 3 2 3 2 Aware of different Needs better groups/people/backgrounds understanding of /ethnic/disabled/aware of their needs. More different needs / give out cultural events to literature and talk to them. bring people together Transport Goal – Get Small Provisions available representatives i.e. dance/disabled fun bus to sit on P/BD Language Barrier, more English classes / Basic skills /
5
Grp 5 2
15
mentors for young people and adults.
Action Points – Policy Development Question 1
What
How
Training Programme
IPPDP for Staff / Volunteers
2
Young People take on an active role / BD / Community decision making
3
Increase Membership of tenants / Residents / BD / Partnership BD
4
More continued involvement from partners / community
5
Use Observatory Training Measuring Outcomes and different methods Film, Digital Stories Better Understanding of cultural needs
6
Who
Training / Development Officer / Coordinator Training – confidence / Youth / Personal Development Community Development workers. Engagement Community Development Team & Social Events / Flyers / Communities word and mouth / visit local First groups / school gates Partnership. Engagement Training Networking Providers / Consultation Staff Flying Start schools, LA, Community Health visitors. Evaluation / community / Training Feedback / questionnaires Providers Staff wishing tree / Bus consultation streets (TORSO) Diversity Training / Cultural Training Events Provider / CIST Partnership
16
3. Performance Management The partnership has a culture of performance management in addressing child poverty Theme Score 3 Child Poverty objectives and targets have been set and End Score 3 fully embedded into the performance management arrangements Question Strengths Areas for Improvement Grp1 Grp2 Grp3 Grp4 Grp5 Per1 4 4 4 4 5 We have a Make all members workplan aware Child Poverty Resourcing risks, clearly identified meeting targets Experience Clarity of target, objective, etc Document continual evaluation / improvements. Indicators for child poverty objectives and targets are appropriate, broad ranging and sufficient to enable the organisation to assess its progress against its objectives Question Strengths Areas for Improvement Per2 Some members Training for new and have more existing knowledge than members/volunteers others and can with no little knowledge pass this on or to have as a refresher course
Score between 1-6 End Score 4 Grp1 Grp2 Grp3 Grp4 Grp5 2 2 3 4 3
Adequate and compatible systems are in place across all Score between 1-6 council services and partner organisations, for End Score 2 generating the information needed to measure performance on shared outcomes and priorities Question Strengths Areas for Improvement Grp1 Grp2 Grp3 Grp4 Grp5 Per3 4 4 4 4 Good relationships Develop a contacts 4 between list / list of services partnerships and available – people we know increase number of (some people not at members of all) partnerships members who Workshop for have access to this partnerships to get info. to know me and others.
17
Internal and external partners have utilised the child poverty performance information to improve services and delivery in order to achieve agreed outcomes Question Strengths Areas for Improvement Per4 Regular review and More people discuss about what involved will be done Finalise Inclusion event Members have actively helped drive improvements. There are clearly defined, effective and complementary roles in the performance management system for the executive, scrutiny and ward councillors Question Strengths Areas for Improvement Per6 Elected members Continue monitoring involved Wider range of Strong support members, more youth. The organisation has dealt with poor performance effectively and recognised and celebrated good performance Question Strengths Areas for Improvement Per6 Won awards for Continuing improving good performance on performance. Green champion Young peoples award contribution Promote to the media and wider community Share good practice.
Score between 1-6 End Score 4 Grp1 Grp2 Grp3 Grp4 Grp5 5 5 5 5 5
Score between 1-6 End Score 2
Grp1 Grp2 Grp3 Grp4 Grp5 6 6 5 5 5
Score between 1-6 End Score 3 Grp1 Grp2 Grp3 Grp4 Grp5 6 6 6 6 6
18
Action Points – Performance Management Question 1
What
How
Who
Make members aware that there’s an evaluation document
Coordinator
2
Training
Training / workshops. Letters to members and during meetings. Publish online / media. Offer Training to members
3
Provide a list of contacts
4
Regular Reviews
5
Keep elected members up to date Annual recognition and achievements
6
Training Officers Leaflet drop (Newsletter) / Community Publish online / Word of developme mouth nt officer / admin Hold monthly meetings to All parties look at performance involved. Training up to date Training Officers Hold community ceremony to All show what partnership has Partnerships. achieved / promote partnerships.
4. Partnership Working There are robust partnership arrangements in place to deliver on Child Poverty Theme Score 3 People throughout the organisation fully understand and Score between 1-6 are aware of how partnerships help reduce child poverty. End Score 3 (2.7) Question Strengths Areas for Improvement Grp1 Grp2 Grp3 Grp4 Grp5 Pa1 3 4 4 4 4 Common interest. Clear Understand people communication working together interest in subject has a bigger impact matter sharing good practice. Child poverty focussed parts of Identifying new the organiser think partners they know what Poor relationships they are doing. between adults and Training for child young people. poverty. Advanced training Partnership working identification of specific needs. Some parts adult focussed, some y.p focussed – not both.
19
People working in partnerships are clear and confident about their role and responsibilities to the partnership and the organisation and have been empowered to take decisions on behalf of the organisation. Question Strengths Areas for Improvement Pa2
People who care, pushy people i.e. council, funders etc. Advocate Willing volunteer’s action plan everyone works to deliver it. People are empowered to get involved. Support workers.
Better direction Better understanding of roles not moving goal posts. Getting more people interested Redefining boundaries
Score between 1-6 End Score 4 (3.9)
Grp 1 2
Grp 2 5
Grp 3 5
The partnership have a shared vision and understanding of child poverty within the locality and recognise its cross cutting nature Question Strengths Areas for Improvement Pa3 Already funded Work together with within C.F area different agencies Financial inclusion – jointly funded projects
Score between 1-6 End Score 4
Partners pool resources to maximises benefit through informal co-ordination, jointly funded projects and posts and through long term mainstream budget pooling at a strategic level. Question Strengths Areas for Improvement Pa4 Shared resources, Involved more working together. agencies, sub groups for different Identified working areas of groups in partnership. Working with others, i.e. police, YOT etc
Score between 1-6 End Score 3 (3.4)
Key members of the partnership champion child poverty issues and support partners organisations in understanding the relevance of Child Poverty to their priorities and how they can contribute to multi-agency delivery Question Strengths Areas for Improvement Pa5 Willing Members Try to encourage (active members) agencies / members willing to to get involved and participate, push child poverty
Score between 1-6 End Score 1 (1.2)
Grp 4 4
Grp5 5
Grp1 Grp2 Grp3 Grp4 Grp5 4 4 6 5 5
Grp1 Grp2 Grp3 Grp4 Grp5 4 4 6 5 4
Grp1 Grp2 Grp3 Grp4 Grp5 3 4 6 3 4
20
volunteers
agenda. Better training / understanding
4 The implications and impact on partnership arrangements of policy and budget decisions have always been taken into account within the annual budget and service planning process Question Strengths Areas for Improvement Pa6 We put in lots if Don’t get very many bids, good better ways of communication. working By using continual More networking observations, be able to assess priorities.
Score between 1-6 End Score 2 (2.4)
Grp1 Grp2 Grp3 Grp4 Grp5 4 4 5 5 5
Action Points – Partnership Working Question 1
What
How
Who
Communicate
Training to improve understanding
2
Better direction of roles and responsibilities Multi agency support
Workshops and feedback
Senior Development Officer All partners involved. Coordinator
3
4
Sharing resources and knowledge
5
All working to child poverty agenda
6
More selective on bids
Include wider range of agencies to meet the needs of community Agencies pooling together “open and honest” approach to budgets / resources / staff talents Child Poverty Sub-group to get the agenda working in practice Focus on bids that are relevant and meet needs of society e.g. youth, community
All Partners’ involved
Coordinator
All staff involved in funding bids – educate other staff on funding applications.
21
5. Capacity & Resource Management Appropriate resources have been consistently matched with Child poverty priorities Theme Score 2 There is a systematic approach to risk management Question Strengths Cap1 At least one ember of staff would be trained. Some knowledge good training programme
Areas for Improvement What is risk management? Schedule and training records Need more time and resources 1 member of staff would have to have knowledge of any project.
Members are fully aware and understand the costs of child poverty and its placing in the priority setting processes of the council and partnerships Question Strengths Areas for Improvement Cap2 Good councillor high More partnership priority. working Good relationships Volunteers more aware of broad Communication impact of child poverty. Distribution of funds. Training needed for other members Better understanding between partnerships. Be aware of H&S The organisation has a good track record of strategically commissioning and procuring goods and services to support the child poverty agenda Question Strengths Areas for Improvement Cap3 Source locally Provide support to local businesses to Joint commissioning obtain arrangements sustainability. More research into requirements
Score between 1-6 End Score 1 Grp1 Grp2 Grp3 Grp4 Grp5 3 2 3 4 3
Score between 1-6 End Score 2 (2.4) Grp1 Grp2 Grp3 Grp4 Grp5 4
3
3
4
3
Score between 1-6 End Score 2 (1.8) Grp1 Grp2 Grp3 Grp4 Grp5 5 5 5 5 5
22
The potential leverage and external funding and investment in child poverty initiatives has been recognised and exploited Question Strengths Areas for Improvement Cap4 Good knowledge of Keep up to date via funding sources internet Good link with Be aware of Interlink, current climate and association of have flexibility to volunteers change Dedicated member Continual training. of staff (statician) The organisation can demonstrate the impact of attracting external funding and other resources to achieve its aims and objectives in relation to child poverty Question Strengths Areas for Improvement Cap5 Sourced playgroup Put measures in place to ensure Sourced Homework groups are club sustainable e.g. Holiday play training, schemes constitution Bookclub Need training on measuring impact. The organisation can demonstrate the involvement of Children and Young people in budget planning processes Question Strengths Areas for Improvement Cap6 Children and young Be aware of people sub group changes in funding sources Children involved in Be aware of their personal budgets – joined changes in local credit union in government schools. Work in partnership with schools and other partnerships to develop knowledge.
Score between 1-6 End Score 3 Grp1 Grp2 Grp3 Grp4 Grp5 6 6 6 5 5
Score between 1-6 End Score 3
Grp1 Grp2 Grp3 Grp4 Grp5 5 5 2 5 2
Score between 1-6 End Score 1 (1.4) Grp1 Grp2 Grp3 Grp4 Grp5
23
Action Points – Capacity Resource Management Question 1
What
How
Who
Risk Management Training
Put on training course
2
Raise awareness
3
Identify local goods and services Keep up to date with funding opportunities
Source Training / workshops In house audit of local business Regular searches for funding opportunities
External Training Provider External training provider Research Officer Local C.V.C (County Voluntary Councils) Development worker Youth worker / Development worker.
4
5 6
Set up a sub group/focus group. Set up a young people’s forum
Invite interested parties Invoice local youth provisions schools etc.
24
List of Participants Name Cheryl Hagerty
Organisation 3 G’s Development Trust
Deanne Rebane Lynne John
3 G’s Development Trust Communtiies First – Mid Valley East
Caren White Alison Ghrairi
Gwent Association of Voluntary Organisations (GAVO) - Bettws Office Communities First – Adamsdown
Barbara McDonald
Communities First – Tonyrefail West
Christine Cain
Communities First – Tonyrefail West
Rhian Kingsbury
Communities First – Tonyrefail West
Kim Pryce Tracey Everton Debbie Burcombe Anita Langdon
Communities First – Tonyrefail West Communities First - Windmill Communities First - Windmill Communities First - Windmill
Debbie Bryn Sara Burrows Jade Owen Carolyn Wellington
Communities First - Windmill Communities First – Tonyrefail Neat Port Talbot Youth Service Communities First Team Neat Port Talbot Youth Service Communities First Team
Elizabeth Osbourne
Communities First – Mid Valleys East Llanelli Womens Aid
Vicky Pedicini Diane Williams
Llanelli Womens Aid
25