-
Communities First
Cwmtopia Child Poverty Self-assessment Report 7th February 2011
CONTENTS
Page 2.
Introduction
3.
Methodology
5.
Self Assessment Bulls-eye
6.
Action Points Summary
11.
Workshop Results
26.
Workshop Evaluation
31.
Action points
32.
List of participants
1
Introduction The group undertook a self-assessment exercise. The focus of self assessment is to establish a partnership’s current approach and ability to act on reducing child poverty and to identify barriers to achieving success. The purpose of the self assessment training to Communities First partnerships is to teach representatives of the partnerships how to conduct a self assessment so they are able to conduct the exercise with their own partnerships. The materials delegates need to support them to deliver a self assessment for themselves is available to download from www.childpovertysolutions.org.uk The session, facilitated by Geraldine Murphy from the WLGA Partnership Support Unit and Ross Chamberlain from Save the Children, Child Poverty Solutions was well attended. The workshop also developed a shared understanding of the child poverty agenda and drew out ideas from the participants to inform their own action planning for child poverty. The organisational themes to be self-assessed are set out in the self-assessment tool on the Child Poverty Solutions website. Each theme incorporates 6 questions. The themes are as follows: 1. Partnership Governance and Leadership Partnership leaders have developed a clear vision for child poverty and positioned it within partnership priorities and can demonstrate a positive impact through these priorities.
2. Policy Development The partnership has a clear approach to delivering outcomes relating to child poverty reduction
3. Performance Management The partnership has a culture of performance management in addressing child poverty
4. Partnership Working There are robust partnership arrangements in place to tackle child poverty
5. Capacity & Resource Management Appropriate resources have been consistently matched with child poverty priorities
2
Methodology 1. Participants invented a partnership called Cwmtopia Communities First partnership. 2. The 5 workshop tables were assigned one of the 5 self assessment themes. 3. Participants were grouped into 5 separate teams by the facilitator. 4. Each team was assigned a table, their ‘home’ table. For this training exercise it does not matter which team has which home table. If the self assessment was for a real partnership then group membership should be predetermined by suitability to one of the 5 themes. 5. Each table is assigned a facilitator from the group. The facilitator stays on the home table for the duration of the exercise. 6. The other group members complete the questions under their home theme guided by the facilitator and the facilitator’s notes. Group participants were invited to discuss and record examples of strengths and areas to develop under each of the 6 questions and agree a final score between 1 and 6 for Cwmtopia’s performance under each question. Score key 1 = No action taken yet 2 = Intending to develop 3 = Starting to develop 4 = Developing 5 = Developing and embedding 6 = Achieving 7. When the allotted time is up (usually about 15 minutes per table) the group (minus the facilitator) moved clockwise around the room to the next table to review and add to the notes made by the previous group. Comments could be added but not deleted. This process continued until all 5 themes had been visited by all 5 groups. 8. When the groups were back at their home tables they reviewed the body of evidence under their home theme and decided a final performance score for each of the 6 questions. Their final task was to conduct a simple What, How, Who action planning exercise. Based on the body of evidence the groups identified two key actions for under each question and decided how the action should be implemented and who should be responsible for delivering it. 9. The self assessment report and action plan is then used to inform the Cwmtopia partnership child poverty action plan.
3
Self Assessment Bulls-eye The self assessment bulls-eye uses the final scores to plot the partnership’s status with regard to it’s ability to act on child poverty. It shows how much progress has been made under each of the themes and which areas are most in need of organisational development. The bulls-eye is an easy reference tool that can also be used to plot organisational progress over time. This report becomes a baseline and after a period of action, say 6 months to a year, simply revisit the questions under each of the 5 themes and honestly score your organisations position. Visit www.childpovertysolutions.org.uk and use the self assessment on line tool to input your new scores and compare the resulting bulls-eye to this baseline. Partnership Governance and Leadership Capacity & Resource Management
Partnership Working
Policy Development
Performance Management
4
Action Points Summary Action Points – Partnership Governance and Leadership Question What 1 Training for board members and volunteers to raise awareness 2 Involve more young people Involve health services
3
4
5
6
Visual objectives needs to be clearly communicated to the board Better understanding of management structure for all staff / board / volunteers To set up a monitoring and evaluation system to track improvements Need to develop joined up working with existing and new partners.
How Training officer develops a training programme.
Who Training officer
Participation training with youth service. Engagement/consultation event to raise awareness and give info Health to be part of partnership board Presentation to the board – include staff
Youth service
Presentation / handouts
Chair of partnership board
Learn from another organisation / partner to get system in place Involving more of the associations e.g. schools / Health in partnership Board
Coordinator to liaise / research
Youth service / Partnership Board Comm & coordinator Training Officer
Coordinator, Chair – anyone linked to health.
5
Action Points – Policy Development Question What 1 Training Programme 2
3
4
5
6
How IPPDP for Staff / Volunteers Young People take on Training – confidence / an active role / BD / Personal Development Community decision making Increase Membership Engagement of tenants / Residents / BD / Partnership BD Social Events / Flyers / word and mouth / visit local groups / school gates More continued Engagement involvement from Networking partners / community Consultation Flying Start schools, LA, Community Health visitors. Use Observatory Evaluation / community Training / Feedback / Measuring Outcomes questionnaires wishing and different methods tree / Bus consultation Film, Digital Stories streets (TORSO) Better Understanding Diversity Training / of cultural needs Cultural Events
Who Training / Development Officer / Coordinator Youth / Community Development workers.
Community Development Team & Communities First Partnership.
Training Staff
Training Staff
Providers
/
Providers
Training Provider CIST Partnership
6
/
Action Points – Performance Management Question What 1 Make members aware that there’s an evaluation document
2
Training
3
Provide a list of contacts
4
Regular Reviews
5
Keep elected members up to date Annual recognition and achievements
6
How Training / workshops. Letters to members and during meetings. Publish online / media. Offer Training to members Leaflet drop (Newsletter) / Publish online / Word of mouth Hold monthly meetings to look at performance Training up to date Hold community ceremony to show what partnership has achieved / promote partnerships.
Who Coordinator
Training Officers Community development officer / admin All parties involved. Training Officers All Partnerships.
7
Action Points – Partnership Working Question What 1 Communicate
How Training to improve understanding
2
Workshops and feedback Include wider range of agencies to meet the needs of community Agencies pooling together “open and honest” approach to budgets / resources / staff talents Child Poverty Subgroup to get the agenda working in practice Focus on bids that are relevant and meet needs of society e.g. youth, community
3
Better direction of roles and responsibilities Multi agency support
4
Sharing resources and knowledge
5
All working to child poverty agenda
6
More selective on bids
Who Senior Development Officer All partners involved. Coordinator
All Partners’ involved
Coordinator
All staff involved in funding bids – educate other staff on funding applications.
8
Action Points – Capacity Resource Management Question What 1 Risk Management Training 2
Raise awareness
3
Identify local goods and services Keep up to date with funding opportunities
4
5 6
Set up a sub group/focus group. Set up a young people’s forum
How Put on training course Source Training / workshops In house audit of local business Regular searches for funding opportunities Invite interested parties Invoice local youth provisions schools etc.
Who External Training Provider External training provider Research Officer Local C.V.C (County Voluntary Councils) Development worker Youth worker / Development worker.
9
Workshop Results 1. Partnership Governance and Leadership Partnership leaders have developed a clear vision for child poverty and positioned it within partnership priorities and can demonstrate a positive impact through these priorities. Theme Score 2 There is a level of awareness and understanding of child poverty and its impact on services for children and young people Question Strengths Areas for Improvement L1 • Established • Board members / partnership – with a volunteers needs high level of – awareness awareness and raised understanding e.g. • Need to identify knowledgeable Stan localised pockets of deprivation. • Training kept up to date.
Members and top managers regard child poverty as a cross cutting issue and have advocated the contribution their agency has to addressing child poverty and motivated others to engage in reducing child poverty Question Strengths Areas for Improvement L2 • Partnerships working • More volunteers & with PCSO’s, RCT partners needed /
Score between 1-6 End Score 3 (3.2) Grp1 Grp2 Grp3 Grp4 Grp5 2 3 4 3 4
Score between 1-6 End Score 3 (3.4)
Grp1 Grp2 Grp3 Grp4 Grp5 3
3
3
3
3
10
Housing Association, police, PACT Meetings
•
young people. Work with SLA’s schools / health
There is a clear vision and objectives for addressing child poverty Question Strengths Areas for Improvement L3 • Good co-ordinator in • Vision / objectives post. Important – need to be clearly strong staffing identified Financial Induction • Partner work NB with youths organisations need some vision to tackle some objectives
Score between 1-6 End Score 2 (2.4) Grp1 Grp2 Grp3 Grp4 Grp5 2 2 3 3 2
Leaders have actively participated within the corporate management arrangements which has resulted in better understanding of child poverty and cross cutting agendas and influencing corporate decision-making Question Strengths Areas for Improvement L4 • What are corporate management objectives? – Not sure we understand what the management structure is beyond our immediate partnership
Score between 1-6 End Score 3 (2.5)
Grp1 Grp2 Grp3 Grp4 Grp5 1 1 1 1 1
Leaders welcome and can demonstrate how internal Score between 1-6 scrutiny and external challenge has assisted in End Score 2 continuous improvement of the child poverty agenda Question Strengths Areas for Improvement Grp1 Grp2 Grp3 Grp4 Grp5 L5 2 3 3 2 4 • Having a • Develop child supportive LA poverty agenda, councillor • Monitoring and Evaluation system to track improvement. Leaders have created a culture of collaboration, Score between 1-6 innovation and cross departmental planning and working End Score 1 (1.4) to address child poverty Question Strengths Areas for Grp1 Grp2 Grp3 Grp4 Grp5 Improvement L6 2 2 2 2 4 • Some good, positive • Need to develop partnerships in place joint working with existing and new • School\health partners. \housing\church\ Adult education\ refugee council
11
Action Points – Partnership Governance and Leadership Question 1 2
3
4
5
6
What Training for board members and volunteers to raise awareness Involve more young people Involve health services
Visual objectives needs to be clearly communicated to the board Better understanding of management structure for all staff / board / volunteers To set up a monitoring and evaluation system to track improvements Need to develop joined up working with existing and new partners.
How Training officer develops a training programme. Participation training with youth service. Engagement/consultation event to raise awareness and give info Health to be part of partnership board Presentation to the board – include staff
Who Training officer
Presentation / handouts
Chair of partnership board Coordinator to liaise / research Coordinator, Chair – anyone linked to health.
Learn from another organisation / partner to get system in place Involving more of the associations e.g. schools / Health in partnership Board
Youth service Youth service / Partnership Board Comm & coordinator Training Officer
12
2. Policy Development The partnership has a clear approach to delivering outcomes relating to child poverty reduction Theme Score 3 The organisation has clear policies and strategies for the Score between 1-6 reduction of child poverty End Score 3 Question Strengths Areas for Improvement Grp1 Grp2 Grp3 Grp4 Grp5 Po1 6 5 5 5 5 • All staff aware of • Continual Training / updated policies workshops • Agree • Training-workshops7 core aims. • Yes staff well informed full time. • Workshop for part times workers / volunteers. Bring you to speed. Policies, strategies and business plans have been developed utilising the best available evidence from a range of sources Question Strengths Areas for Improvement Po2 • Encourage more • Youth forum in place young people to join/engage • Lounge – youth • Develop young group / encouraged to people to join, be attend P/BD active young people – Have their say • Access to a wide range of youth • Multiple choice provisions surveys – To identify priorities. • Credit Union Facilities Under represented or priority groups have been effectively included in the service planning process Question Strengths Areas for Improvement Po3 • Actively work with • Encourage / community / police Develop / Increase / health / schools / membership of local tenants/Resident adult education. groups (P.Board) • Intergenerational activities (share • Continue to develop skills, gardening) individuals capacity building / confidence • Multi agency to show different working - strong boards / Have LA target wide voice audience. • Develop – 1 person from different groups
Score between 1-6 End Score 2 Grp1 Grp2 Grp3 Grp4 Grp5 4 4 4 4 4
Score between 1-6 End Score 4 (3.6) Grp1 Grp2 Grp3 Grp4 Grp5 4 4 4 4 4
13
to show BD / Youth forum. Child poverty is reflected within community planning arrangements and there is a clear line of sight between the Community Plan and Corporate priorities, service objectives and individual objectives Question Strengths Areas for Improvement Po4 • Established areas • Continual of child poverty in development community, between children / working towards families / providers solutions to tackle • More joined up this. working/Right • Defined areas if Partners poverty represented. A mechanism to monitor progress on implementing the strategy is in place and there is widespread staff ownership of vision, mission and values Question Strengths Areas for Improvement Po5 • Regular Evaluation – • Better means “Smart” with of evaluation / staff/partners/volunteers/ effectiveness. case studies/record info/ Staff – digital Training (monitoring evaluation, different methods) • Training to capture outcomes. • Measure soft outcomes.
Score between 1-6 End Score 2
Grp1 Grp2 Grp3 Grp4 Grp5 4 4 4 4 4
Score between 1-6 End Score 2 Grp1 Grp2 Grp3 Grp4 Grp5 4
5
5
5
The organisation has regularly engaged with the most under- Score between 1-6 represented groups and improved services to them as a End Score 3 (3.4) result Questi Strengths Areas for Grp Grp Grp Grp on Improvement 1 2 3 4 Po6 3 2 3 2 • Aware of different • Needs better groups/people/backgrounds understanding of /ethnic/disabled/aware of their needs. More different needs / give out cultural events to literature and talk to them. bring people together • Transport • Goal – Get • Small Provisions available representatives i.e. dance/disabled fun bus to sit on P/BD • Language Barrier, more
5
Grp 5 2
14
English classes / Basic skills / mentors for young people and adults.
Action Points – Policy Development Question 1
What
How
Training Programme
IPPDP for Staff / Volunteers
2
Young People take on an active role / BD / Community decision making
3
Increase Membership of tenants / Residents / BD / Partnership BD
4
More continued involvement from partners / community
5
Use Observatory Training Measuring Outcomes and different methods Film, Digital Stories Better Understanding of cultural needs
6
Who
Training / Development Officer / Coordinator Training – confidence / Youth / Personal Development Community Development workers. Engagement Community Development Team & Social Events / Flyers / Communities word and mouth / visit local First groups / school gates Partnership. Engagement Training Networking Providers / Consultation Staff Flying Start schools, LA, Community Health visitors. Evaluation / community / Training Feedback / questionnaires Providers Staff wishing tree / Bus consultation streets (TORSO) Diversity Training / Cultural Training Events Provider / CIST Partnership
15
3. Performance Management The partnership has a culture of performance management in addressing child poverty Theme Score 3 Child Poverty objectives and targets have been set and End Score 3 fully embedded into the performance management arrangements Question Strengths Areas for Improvement Grp1 Grp2 Grp3 Grp4 Grp5 Per1 4 4 4 4 5 • We have a • Make all members workplan aware • Child Poverty • Resourcing risks, clearly identified meeting targets • Experience • Clarity of target, objective, etc • Document continual evaluation / improvements. Indicators for child poverty objectives and targets are appropriate, broad ranging and sufficient to enable the organisation to assess its progress against its objectives Question Strengths Areas for Improvement Per2 • Training for new and • Some members have more existing knowledge than members/volunteers others and can with no little knowledge pass this on or to have as a refresher course
Score between 1-6 End Score 4 Grp1 Grp2 Grp3 Grp4 Grp5 2 2 3 4 3
Adequate and compatible systems are in place across all Score between 1-6 council services and partner organisations, for End Score 2 generating the information needed to measure performance on shared outcomes and priorities Question Strengths Areas for Improvement Grp1 Grp2 Grp3 Grp4 Grp5 Per3 4 4 4 4 • Good relationships • Develop a contacts 4 between list / list of services partnerships and available – people we know increase number of (some people not at members of all) partnerships members who • Workshop for have access to this partnerships to get info. to know me and others. Internal and external partners have utilised the child poverty performance information to improve services and delivery in order to achieve agreed outcomes Question Strengths Areas for Improvement
Score between 1-6 End Score 4 Grp1 Grp2 Grp3 Grp4 Grp5
16
Per4
•
Regular review and discuss about what will be done
• •
More people involved Finalise Inclusion event
Members have actively helped drive improvements. There are clearly defined, effective and complementary roles in the performance management system for the executive, scrutiny and ward councillors Question Strengths Areas for Improvement Per6 • Elected members • Continue monitoring involved • Wider range of • Strong support members, more youth.
5
5
5
5
5
Score between 1-6 End Score 2
Grp1 Grp2 Grp3 Grp4 Grp5 6 6 5 5 5
The organisation has dealt with poor performance Score between 1-6 effectively and recognised and celebrated good End Score 3 performance Question Strengths Areas for Improvement Grp1 Grp2 Grp3 Grp4 Grp5 Per6 6 6 6 6 • Won awards for • Continuing improving 6 good performance on performance. • Green champion • Young peoples award contribution • Promote to the media and wider community • Share good practice.
Action Points – Performance Management Question 1
What
How
Who
Make members aware that there’s an evaluation document
Coordinator
2
Training
Training / workshops. Letters to members and during meetings. Publish online / media. Offer Training to members
3
Provide a list of contacts
4
Regular Reviews
5
Keep elected members up to date Annual recognition and achievements
6
Training Officers Leaflet drop (Newsletter) / Community Publish online / Word of developme mouth nt officer / admin Hold monthly meetings to All parties look at performance involved. Training up to date Training Officers Hold community ceremony to All show what partnership has Partnerships. achieved / promote partnerships. 17
4. Partnership Working There are robust partnership arrangements in place to tackle child poverty Theme Score 3 People throughout the organisation fully understand and are aware of how partnerships help reduce child poverty. Question Strengths Areas for Improvement Pa1 • Common interest. • Clear Understand people communication working together interest in subject has a bigger impact matter sharing good practice. • Child poverty • Identifying new focussed parts of the organiser think partners they know what • Poor relationships they are doing. between adults and • Training for child young people. poverty. • Advanced training • Partnership working identification of specific needs. • Some parts adult focussed, some y.p focussed – not both.
Score between 1-6 End Score 3 (2.7) Grp1 Grp2 Grp3 Grp4 Grp5 3 4 4 4 4
People working in partnerships are clear and confident about their role and responsibilities to the partnership and the organisation and have been empowered to take decisions on behalf of the organisation. Question Strengths Areas for Improvement
Score between 1-6 End Score 4 (3.9)
Pa2
•
•
•
People who care, pushy people i.e. council, funders etc. Advocate Willing volunteer’s action plan everyone works to deliver it. People are empowered to get involved. Support workers.
• •
• •
Better direction Better understanding of roles not moving goal posts. Getting more people interested Redefining boundaries
The partnership have a shared vision and understanding of child poverty within the locality and recognise its cross cutting nature Question Strengths Areas for Improvement
Grp 1 2
Grp 2 5
Grp 3 5
Grp 4 4
Grp5 5
Score between 1-6 End Score 4 Grp1 Grp2 Grp3 Grp4 Grp5
18
Pa3
• •
Already funded within C.F area Financial inclusion – jointly funded projects
•
Work together with different agencies
Partners pool resources to maximises benefit through informal co-ordination, jointly funded projects and posts and through long term mainstream budget pooling at a strategic level. Question Strengths Areas for Improvement Pa4 • Shared resources, • Involved more working together. agencies, sub groups for different • Identified working areas of groups in partnership. • Working with others, i.e. police, YOT etc Key members of the partnership champion child poverty issues and support partners organisations in understanding the relevance of Child Poverty to their priorities and how they can contribute to multi-agency delivery Question Strengths Areas for Improvement Pa5 • Willing Members • Try to encourage (active members) agencies / members willing to to get involved and participate, push child poverty volunteers agenda. Better training / understanding 4 The implications and impact on partnership arrangements of policy and budget decisions have always been taken into account within the annual budget and service planning process Question Strengths Areas for Improvement Pa6 • We put in lots if • Don’t get very many bids, good better ways of communication. working By using continual • More networking observations, be able to assess priorities.
4
4
6
5
5
Score between 1-6 End Score 3 (3.4)
Grp1 Grp2 Grp3 Grp4 Grp5 4 4 6 5 4
Score between 1-6 End Score 1 (1.2)
Grp1 Grp2 Grp3 Grp4 Grp5 3 4 6 3 4
Score between 1-6 End Score 2 (2.4)
Grp1 Grp2 Grp3 Grp4 Grp5 4 4 5 5 5
19
Action Points – Partnership Working Question 1
What
How
Who
Communicate
Training to improve understanding
2
Better direction of roles and responsibilities Multi agency support
Workshops and feedback
Senior Development Officer All partners involved. Coordinator
3
4
Sharing resources and knowledge
5
All working to child poverty agenda
6
More selective on bids
Include wider range of agencies to meet the needs of community Agencies pooling together “open and honest” approach to budgets / resources / staff talents Child Poverty Sub-group to get the agenda working in practice Focus on bids that are relevant and meet needs of society e.g. youth, community
All Partners’ involved
Coordinator
All staff involved in funding bids – educate other staff on funding applications.
20
5. Capacity & Resource Management Appropriate resources have been consistently matched with child poverty priorities Theme Score 2 There is a systematic approach to risk management Question Strengths Cap1 • At least one ember of staff would be trained. • Some knowledge good training programme
Areas for Improvement • What is risk management? • Schedule and training records • Need more time and resources • 1 member of staff would have to have knowledge of any project.
Members are fully aware and understand the costs of child poverty and its placing in the priority setting processes of the council and partnerships Question Strengths Areas for Improvement Cap2 • Good councillor high • More partnership priority. working • Good relationships • Volunteers more aware of broad • Communication impact of child poverty. • Distribution of funds. • Training needed for other members • Better understanding between partnerships. • Be aware of H&S The organisation has a good track record of strategically commissioning and procuring goods and services to support the child poverty agenda Question Strengths Areas for Improvement Cap3 • Source locally • Provide support to local businesses to • Joint commissioning obtain arrangements sustainability. • More research into requirements
Score between 1-6 End Score 1 Grp1 Grp2 Grp3 Grp4 Grp5 3 2 3 4 3
Score between 1-6 End Score 2 (2.4) Grp1 Grp2 Grp3 Grp4 Grp5 4
3
3
4
3
Score between 1-6 End Score 2 (1.8) Grp1 Grp2 Grp3 Grp4 Grp5 5 5 5 5 5
21
The potential leverage and external funding and investment in child poverty initiatives has been recognised and exploited Question Strengths Areas for Improvement Cap4 • Good knowledge of • Keep up to date via funding sources internet • Good link with • Be aware of Interlink, current climate and association of have flexibility to volunteers change • Dedicated member • Continual training. of staff (statician) The organisation can demonstrate the impact of attracting external funding and other resources to achieve its aims and objectives in relation to child poverty Question Strengths Areas for Improvement Cap5 • Put measures in • Sourced playgroup place to ensure • Sourced Homework groups are club sustainable e.g. • Holiday play training, schemes constitution • Bookclub • Need training on measuring impact. The organisation can demonstrate the involvement of Children and Young people in budget planning processes Question Strengths Areas for Improvement Cap6 • Children and young • Be aware of people sub group changes in funding sources • Children involved in their personal • Be aware of budgets – joined changes in local credit union in government schools. • Work in partnership with schools and other partnerships to develop knowledge.
Score between 1-6 End Score 3 Grp1 Grp2 Grp3 Grp4 Grp5 6 6 6 5 5
Score between 1-6 End Score 3
Grp1 Grp2 Grp3 Grp4 Grp5 5 5 2 5 2
Score between 1-6 End Score 1 (1.4) Grp1 Grp2 Grp3 Grp4 Grp5
22
Action Points – Capacity Resource Management Question 1
What
How
Who
Risk Management Training
Put on training course
2
Raise awareness
3
Identify local goods and services Keep up to date with funding opportunities
Source Training / workshops In house audit of local business Regular searches for funding opportunities
External Training Provider External training provider Research Officer Local C.V.C (County Voluntary Councils) Development worker Youth worker / Development worker.
4
5 6
Set up a sub group/focus group. Set up a young people’s forum
Invite interested parties Invoice local youth provisions schools etc.
23
List of Participants Name Cheryl Hagerty
Organisation 3 G’s Development Trust
Deanne Rebane Lynne John
3 G’s Development Trust Communities First – Mid Valley East
Caren White Geraint Jones Gareth Hughes
Gwent Association of Voluntary Organisations (GAVO) – Bettws Office Ystrad Communities First Ystrad Communities First
Bron Lloyd
Communities First – Stow Hill
Alison Ghrairi
Communities First – Adamsdown
Barbara McDonald Christine Cain Rhian Kingsbury
Communities First – Tonyrefail West Communities First – Tonyrefail West Communities First – Tonyrefail West
Kim Pryce
Communities First – Tonyrefail West
Tracey Everton Debbie Burcombe
Communities First – Wildmill Communities First – Wildmill
Anita Langdon
Communities First – Wildmill
Debbie Bryn
Communities First – Wildmill
Sara Burrows Jade Owen
Communities First – Wildmill Neath Port Talbot Youth Service Communities First Team
Carolyn Wellington Elizabeth Osbourne
Neath Port Talbot Youth Service Communities First Team Communities First – Mid Valleys East
Vicky Pedicini Diane Williams
Llanelli Womens Aid Llanelli Womens Aid
24