Retail Market Report
San Francisco - CA
PREPARED BY
Roark O'Neill Real Estate Agent
San Francisco Retail
RETAIL MARKET REPORT
Market Key Statistics
2
Leasing
4
Rent
9
Construction
11
Under Construction Properties
13
Sales
14
Sales Past 12 Months
16
Economy
18
Market Submarkets
22
Supply & Demand Trends
26
Rent & Vacancy
30
Sale Trends
34
Copyrighted report licensed to COMPASS - 1028085
2/22/2021
Overview San Francisco Retail 12 Mo Deliveries in SF
12 Mo Net Absorption in SF
Vacancy Rate
12 Mo Rent Growth
53.1 K
(1.1 M)
4.8%
-3.8%
California lifted stay-at-home orders at the end of January and reopening the economy will no longer be based on ICU availability. Indoor retail businesses will be allowed to open at 25% capacity, and businesses with outdoor operations can resume. Common areas and food courts will remain closed at shopping centers and malls. Personal care service businesses, including nail and hair salons, are also set to reopen if in compliance with local health guidelines. Yelp data shows that thousands of businesses temporarily closed in San Francisco during previous shutdowns, and more than 25% ended up permanently closed. This past trend does not bode well for retail tenants and landlords in the near term, but businesses that survive could see a vastly improved economy by 2022. Until then, many retailers will deal with slower foot traffic, lower consumer sentiment, lost wages, and constrained consumer spending activity. Retail occupancy declined for the fourth consecutive year in 2020 with move-outs coming from underperforming big box stores and small businesses. Leasing activity was muted after the initial outbreak and was about 50% of pre-covid levels. Brick and mortar retailers were already weathering a slew of headwinds before the pandemic, and the temporary closing of shopping malls, indoor shopping, and entertainment venues adds more uncertainty for landlords, tenants, investors, and lenders alike. Mall owners were already busy redesigning, and releasing spaces abandoned by struggling tenants. Big box retailers including Macy's, Nordstrom, and Kmart have shed large blocks of space and closed stores in San Francisco. Store closings have amplified amid the pandemic, particularly among smaller retailers short on cash reserves. The California Restaurant Association stated that 30,000 restaurants in the state could close permanently due to social distancing measures that have shuttered dining rooms and led to widespread layoffs. Prior to the coronavirus, retailers including San Francisco-based Gap, JCPenny, Forever 21, and Victoria's Secret announced nationwide store closings, which will impact fundamentals for several more years to come. The December 2018 closure of luxury retailer
Gumps, San Francisco's oldest department store, was emblematic of the pre-covid environment. Shopping malls and power centers, in particular, have been hit hardest in the “retail apocalypse” playing out across the nation. Vacancy within San Francisco's power centers has jumped up higher, to 8.7%, while mall vacancy has climbed to 13.8%, matching highs last seen in the economic recession. Space availability rates in malls are even higher at 8.8%. San Francisco holds very few traditional shopping malls for a major city, which perhaps has helped guard against an even stronger decline in occupancy. Westfield San Francisco Centre, on Market Street, and Stonestown Galleria, on the residential Westside, are the city's only two regional malls, and three malls serve residents in San Mateo County south of the city: Serramonte Center, The Shops at Tanforan, and Hillsdale Mall. Supply growth over the past decade has been measured, and active construction levels in the market are not overwhelmingly high. Major development should remain on hold in the foreseeable future, as a recently delivered mall in the city's center has struggled with leasing, and plans for an outlet mall on Candlestick Point were scrapped. Recent demand has been generated by experimental retail stores, small-footprint fitness centers, the expansion of click-to-bricks retailers like Amazon Go, and omnichannel supermarkets led by Whole Foods. Upscale bistros and electronically enabled lunch eateries with a focus on local, fresh ingredients were opening as newcomers took their shot at success in the country's densest city for restaurants, but the coronavirus shutdown and social distancing measures will undoubtedly scare many restauranteurs from opening in 2020. Beyond new social distancing measures, high rents, expensive build-out costs, and lengthy delays in permitting prevent aspiring restaurateurs and retailers from opening new locations in San Francisco. Margins were already razor-thin, as the costs of goods and labor rose rapidly in the expansion period. In response to the volatile and risky retail landscape, pop-ups, short-term leases, and smaller spaces have been in vogue as tenants aim for profitability in a challenging landscape.
Copyrighted report licensed to COMPASS - 1028085
2/22/2021 Page 2
Overview San Francisco Retail Some available retail spaces, particularly on rough stretches Mid-Market and in the Waterfront/North Beach Submarket, are sitting vacant for years. This phenomenon has prompted San Francisco's board of supervisors to enact an ordinance requiring owners of vacant storefronts, even those offered for lease or sale, to register their properties and pay an annual fee of $711. In addition, supervisor Aaron Peskin's proposal to tax owners of storefronts in 12 newly established Neighborhood Commercial Districts that sit vacant for six months or longer $250/day was passed by voters in the March 2020 ballot, although its implementation will be delayed due to the pandemic. The new vacancy tax is aimed at revitalizing the city's unused retail space but does not necessarily address the myriad of costs preventing new store and restaurant openings. It's unknown if landlords will lower asking rents in response, or if doing so will help fill vacant spaces, particularly in today's new environment Same-store rent growth in the market had already fallen
to negligible levels prior to the coronavirus pandemic, and rents are declining now as landlords are adjusting to weakening demand. Annual rent growth in the expansion cycle peaked at a robust 6.2% in 2015 but fell below the national average in 2017. Upheaval and transition of the market's tenant base generated some unique acquisition and redevelopment opportunities in recent years. Sales volume hit a record level in 2019 and remained elevated in 20Q1 as deals negotiated before the pandemic were closed, but did fall noticeably for the rest of 2020. Despite a slowdown in tenant demand and a consistent slowdown in rent growth over the past four years, average pricing in the market has remained rather resilient. The tech industry powered strong local population and income growth in the 2010's expansion cycle, which in turn, attracted investors even at low yields. But. investor sentiment, lender financing appetites, and credit flows will grow increasingly strained as retail properties bear the brunt of the coronavirus crisis.
KEY INDICATORS RBA
Vacancy Rate
Market Rent
Availability Rate
Net Absorption SF
Deliveries SF
Under Construction
Malls
5,080,968
13.8%
$47.31
8.8%
(250,223)
0
263,640
Power Center
2,282,725
8.7%
$43.01
8.9%
10,493
0
0
Neighborhood Center
7,649,487
6.7%
$43.49
7.6%
(5,158)
0
0
Strip Center
1,826,960
3.0%
$35.63
3.4%
(6,493)
0
0
General Retail
63,985,001
3.8%
$41.91
4.5%
(72,524)
0
14,147
Other
1,093,302
3.7%
$127.73
3.9%
0
0
0
Market
81,918,443
4.8%
$43.45
5.2%
(323,905)
0
277,787
12 Month
Historical Average
Forecast Average
Peak
When
Trough
When
Current Quarter
Annual Trends
Vacancy Change (YOY)
1.3%
3.2%
4.9%
5.6%
2006 Q2
2.1%
2016 Q2
Net Absorption SF
(1.1 M)
99,987
(110,061)
2,107,376
2007 Q3
(956,762)
2020 Q3
Deliveries SF
53.1 K
236,329
174,645
851,773
2007 Q2
16,713
2013 Q1
Rent Growth
-3.8%
2.1%
2.1%
6.2%
2015 Q1
-4.1%
2021 Q1
Sales Volume
$695 M
$703.3M
N/A
$1.4B
2019 Q4
$176.8M
2009 Q3
Copyrighted report licensed to COMPASS - 1028085
2/22/2021 Page 3
Leasing San Francisco Retail San Francisco's retail market has weakened for years as brick and mortar tenants struggled with e-commerce and rising business costs, and now the coronavirus pandemic presents an unprecedented disruption. Net absorption in the market turned negative in 2018 and 2019, with occupancy losses only hastening in 2020. In the wake of San Francisco's economic shutdown and relatively strict social distancing policies, many restaurants, gyms, and entertainment venues are going out of business permanently, in addition to the mix of storefront and mall retailers who were already closing doors. Yelp reported that more than 5,000 businesses have closed while complying with shutdowns (about 40% of which turned into permanent closures) with the SFOakland metro suffering one of the highest rates of closures across the country. Many restaurants have closed doors. Mom and pop retailers without capital reserves have struggled to stay afloat through the coronavirus pandemic. Since 2018, over 2 million SF of retail space across the metro has been vacated in aggregate. Vacancy in the market has doubled from economic expansion-era lows and is climbing higher at a brisk pace. The vacancy rate is up from a historic bottom of 2.1% reached in 2015, to 4.8% today and is likely to rise higher in the year to come. Malls and power centers, in particular, were struggling prior to the coronavirus outbreak. Vacancy within San Francisco's power centers has jumped to 8.7%, while mall vacancy has climbed to 13.8%, far ahead of the other retail subtypes. Vacancy within these sectors has risen to highs last seen at the peak of the great recession in 2007. Big-box retailers have shed space as the consumer's preference for online shopping grows. Neighborhood center vacancy is up to 6.7% Conversely, vacancy among strip centers remains at a historic low of 3.0%, but this outperforming segment has been hit hard in the coronavirus shutdown. Nonessential businesses with lost income streams have requested rent forbearance from property owners. Many retailers were already struggling to keep up with rent and payroll as sales flagged. Macy's sold their Union Square men's store building at 100 Stockton St. in 2017, to Morgan Stanley and local retail developer Blatteis Realty Company. Led by Gensler, the redeveloped eightstory property will feature flagship retail, art galleries, artisanal food, premium dining venues, and creative
office space. Macy's vacated the nearly 264,000-SF building in 2018, which is expected to be ready for new tenants by the close of 2020. Large department stores like the former Macy's in Union Square and Stonestown Galleria are being transformed into mixed-use centers, with a broader array of smaller retailers, dining, and entertainment options. In addition, under-utilized retail sites throughout the metro have been demolished, making way for the development of higher-income properties. The 6x6 mall, a 250,000-SF, six-story enclosed building on Sixth Street was sold to Ikea's Ingka Centres in 2020. The glass exterior building is located a half-block from Westfield's San Francisco Centre on Market Street and has remained vacant, seeking an anchor tenant since completion in 2017. Converting space into office use is a rising trend in the market, as landlords are repositioning retail assets to better suit evolving consumer trends. Even the Westfield mall has plans to convert 50,000 SF on its seventh and eighth floors into offices in part of its larger renovation. While vacancies are clearly on the rise overall, San Francisco still boasts comparatively strong fundamentals. Among the country's 20 largest retail markets, San Francisco maintains the third-lowest vacancy rate according to CoStar research. Southern California retail markets have experienced more severe store closures and occupancy losses over the past year. Only Boston and Seattle, other supply-constrained markets, maintain a tighter overall vacancy rate. Retail fundamentals are faring better in San Francisco than in many markets around the country for several reasons. The development of retail space over the past decade has been measured, and offset by the demolition of obsolete properties, so overall inventory supply growth has been negligible. Meanwhile, demand has been at least been aided by the metro's economic strength. Population growth in the 2010s economic expansion led to an increase in density, while income growth has provided an expanding consumer base with greater purchasing power. Also at Stonestown Galleria, an expanded Target store opened doors in 20Q2. Target established a 32,000 SF store at Stonestown back in 2017, and recently expanded into some of Nordstrom's old space, tripling its footprint. Target first entered the city in 2012, and has
Copyrighted report licensed to COMPASS - 1028085
2/22/2021 Page 4
Leasing San Francisco Retail found success with both large and small-format stores. Moving forward, vacancy continues to rise in CoStar's forecast as a result of the market's devastating economic shutdown and limitations on commerce. Supply growth will primarily stem from the re-configured former Macy's Stonestown Gallery space that as mentioned has been
fully preleased, as well as the former Macy's owned 100 Stockton St. building, which now has 5 floors available for retailers and 2 upper floors available as office space. The combination of supply growth and occupancy losses compound in the forecast and yield a vacancy rate that coincides with the national trend line.
NET ABSORPTION, NET DELIVERIES & VACANCY
Copyrighted report licensed to COMPASS - 1028085
2/22/2021 Page 5
Leasing San Francisco Retail VACANCY RATE
AVAILABILITY RATE
Copyrighted report licensed to COMPASS - 1028085
2/22/2021 Page 6
Leasing San Francisco Retail 12 MONTH NET ABSORPTION SF IN SELECTED BUILDINGS
Net Absorption SF Building Name/Address
Submarket
Bldg SF
Vacant SF 1st Qtr
2nd Qtr
3rd Qtr
4th Qtr
12 Month
Stonestown Galleria
Southern City
160,505
102,633
0
0
0
0
57,867
Gateway of Pacific
South San Francisco
50,000
0
0
0
0
0
50,000
Veterans Square
Redwood City
107,278
0
0
0
0
0
30,345
Transbay Transit Center
South Financial District
98,330
18,523
0
0
0
0
28,015
The Bazaar on Nob Hill
Van Ness/Chinatown
13,830
0
0
0
0
0
13,830
The Cove at Oyster Point
South San Francisco
15,870
2,541
0
0
0
0
13,329
2406 El Camino Real
Redwood City
12,000
0
0
0
0
0
12,000
Peninsula Boardwalk
Redwood City
99,922
0
0
0
0
0
11,358
Westlake Shopping Center
Brisbane/Daly City
62,088
2,014
0
0
0
0
11,018
532 Sutter St
Union Square
16,596
0
0
0
0
0
9,720
740 Washington St
Van Ness/Chinatown
13,600
0
0
0
0
0
9,536
1412-1414 Van Ness Ave
Van Ness/Chinatown
31,000
0
0
0
0
0
9,500
1500 Collins Ave
Brisbane/Daly City
16,000
0
0
0
0
0
9,422
The City Center
West of Van Ness
22,702
0
22,072
0
0
0
9,074
6X6
MidMarket
255,765
198,425
0
0
0
0
7,944
Menlo Square
Menlo Park
7,463
0
0
0
0
0
7,463
Third Avenue Center
San Mateo
50,000
38,300
0
0
0
0
7,383
Subtotal Primary Competitors
1,032,949
362,436
22,072
0
0
0
297,804
Remaining San Francisco Market
80,950,221
3,582,929
(345,977)
0
0
0
(1,353,359)
Total San Francisco Market
81,983,170
3,945,365
(323,905)
0
0
0
(1,055,555)
Copyrighted report licensed to COMPASS - 1028085
2/22/2021 Page 7
Leasing San Francisco Retail TOP RETAIL LEASES PAST 12 MONTHS Building Name/Address
Submarket
Leased SF
1355-1395 Van Ness Ave
Van Ness/Chinatown
Q1 21 -
-
Cushman & Wakefield
San Francisco Design Center
Showplace Square
25,000
Q1 20 Samsara
-
-
1500 Collins Ave
Brisbane/Daly City
16,000
Q3 20 Tesla
-
Colliers International
928 Whipple Ave
Redwood City
14,700
Q1 21 -
-
KW Commercial
140 Geary St
Union Square
14,116
Q4 20 -
Cushman & Wakefield Cushman & Wakefield
Merril's
MidMarket
13,000
Q4 20 Bait, Inc.
Compass Commercial
Compass Commercial
100 El Camino Real *
Belmont/San Carlos
12,402
Q3 20 Planet Granite
-
-
The Bazaar on Nob Hill
Van Ness/Chinatown
11,912
Q1 20 WOW! Kid's Playground
-
-
San Bruno Towne Center *
San Bruno/Millbrae
9,000
Q1 21 Chuck E. Cheese
-
The Berube Company,…
2360-2366 Mission St
Mission
9,000
Q1 21 -
-
Intero Real Estate Serv…
Yotel San Francisco
San Francisco Market St…
7,826
Q4 20 -
CBRE
CBRE
280 Metro Center
Brisbane/Daly City
7,500
Q2 20 Spirit of Halloween
Kimco Realty Corpor… Kimco Realty Corporati…
1294 Burlingame Ave
Burlingame
6,860
Q1 21 -
-
COMPASS
1700 Fillmore St
West of Van Ness
6,659
Q1 21 -
-
Maven Commercial, Inc.
1208 Donnelly Ave
Burlingame
6,370
Q1 21 Anthem Interiors
-
Capital Realty Group, Inc.
Bay Meadows
Hillsdale
6,000
Q2 20 -
-
Retail West
315 Main St
Peninsula Coastline
6,000
Q2 20 Fattoria e Mare
-
CBRE;Robert Mascall…
466-478 Green St
Waterfront/North Beach
5,978
Q3 20 American Bites
-
Maven Commercial, Inc.
559-567 Sutter St
Union Square
5,916
Q3 20 -
-
Chad Mitchell Associat…
2205 Middlefield Rd *
Redwood City
5,750
Q1 20 Estrellita Market
-
-
DaVita/Dunn Edwards Building *
Brisbane/Daly City
5,677
Q2 20 Dunn-Edwards Paints
-
-
Westlake Shopping Center
Brisbane/Daly City
5,600
Q1 20 National Asian American…
-
Kimco Realty Corporation
Menlo Square
Menlo Park
5,488
Q1 20 -
-
Colliers International
1500 Mission St
MidMarket
5,424
Q1 20 -
-
JLL
1429 San Mateo Ave
South San Francisco
5,000
Q1 21 -
-
Coldwell Banker Comm…
355 11th St
South of Market
4,959
Q4 20 -
-
Maven Commercial, Inc.
The Mills Bldg *
Financial District
4,879
Q4 20 illy Caffè
Avison Young
-
L Seven
SoMa
4,749
Q1 20 -
-
JLL
4th Ave & Geary Farmers Market
West of Van Ness
4,500
Q3 20 Abraham Farmers Market
COMPASS
COMPASS
Pine Street Center
Financial District
4,426
Q2 20 California Bank and Trust
Hughes Marino
CBRE
Peninsula Boardwalk
Redwood City
4,292
Q2 20 -
-
Crosspoint Realty
1157 Folsom St
South of Market
4,125
Q4 20 -
-
CIG Corp.
601-625 Grant Ave
Van Ness/Chinatown
4,067
Q1 20 -
-
Maven Commercial, Inc.
1600-1610 Polk St
Van Ness/Chinatown
4,000
Q3 20 -
-
Vanguard Properties
Showplace East
Showplace Square
3,852
Q2 20 -
-
Showplace East
Showplace East
Showplace Square
3,850
Q1 20 Paris Tile and Ceramics
Ground Matrix
Ground Matrix
1098 Sutter St
Van Ness/Chinatown
3,840
Q1 20 Halal Dastarkhan
Avison Young
-
One Post
Financial District
3,759
Q1 21 -
-
CBRE
268 O'Farrell St
Union Square
3,755
Q2 20 -
-
Handlery Hotels, Inc.
National Center Bldg
Union Square
3,496
Q1 20 -
-
Cushman & Wakefield
200,000
Qtr Tenant Name
Tenant Rep Company Leasing Rep Company
*Renewal
Copyrighted report licensed to COMPASS - 1028085
2/22/2021 Page 8
Rent San Francisco Retail Rent growth in San Francisco's retail market decelerated from 2015 through 2019 as tenant demand weakened, and rent losses are now occurring in an environment where retail sales have dropped and many retailers are forced to permanently shutter. Leasing activity has plunged and may remain subdued for some time as retailers will be tentative to open new spaces, given the uncertain outlook for economic recovery and a return to relatively normal social interactions and commercial consumption levels. Asking rents are heading lower as social distancing measures curtail retail sales in San Francisco sharply. On a trailing year basis, the market's same-store asking rent average has declined by -3.8%. Weighted-average asking rents have declined rapidly since 19Q4, as vacancy continues to mount, and social distancing
measures curtail leasing demand and store openings. Rent growth peaked above 5% in 2015, notching the strongest gains across the nation, so the downturn into negative territory over the past year has been precipitous. Landlords are quickly adjusting to weaker leasing prospects but have yet to cut asking rents substantially across the board. Overall market rent levels average $43.43/SF/NNN. That ranks the San Francisco metro as one of the most expensive markets in the country, following Honolulu and New York, and just ahead of San Jose. That said, rents in Manhattan are far higher than in San Francisco's most expensive submarkets, Waterfront/North Beach, the Financial District, Union Square, and Yerba Buena.
MARKET RENT GROWTH (YOY)
Copyrighted report licensed to COMPASS - 1028085
2/22/2021 Page 9
Rent San Francisco Retail MARKET RENT PER SQUARE FEET
Copyrighted report licensed to COMPASS - 1028085
2/22/2021 Page 10
Construction San Francisco Retail Retail development in San Francisco is notoriously limited. Only a handful of properties, primarily renovation projects, totaling approximately 280,000 SF are under construction. Large department stores in Union Square and Stonestown Galleria are being transformed into mixeduse centers, with a broader array of smaller retailers, dining, and entertainment options, which will provide for some inventory growth moving forward. Stonestown Galleria's redevelopment will be anchored by Whole Foods, and the mall recently opened an expanded Target store. At the former Macy's owned 100 Stockton St. redevelopment project, 5 floors are available for retailers and 2 upper floors are available for office tenants. No
other significant retail properties are under construction. For a city the size of San Francisco, relatively little new retail space has been developed over the past decade, coinciding with strong economic gains. In terms of inventory under construction as a percentage of existing inventory, San Francisco ranks towards the bottom of the country. No noteworthy retail construction projects have broken ground since early 2019. Candlestick Point developer Five Point officially pivoted away from building a $1 billion dollar outlet mall in early 2019, terminating their deal with Macerich, and instead of preparing to redevelop the site for office and research use. Five Point initially suspended the development of the mall in 2017, due to the rapidly evolving retail landscape.
DELIVERIES & DEMOLITIONS
Copyrighted report licensed to COMPASS - 1028085
2/22/2021 Page 11
Construction San Francisco Retail SUBMARKET CONSTRUCTION Under Construction Inventory No.
Submarket
Average Building Size
Bldgs
SF (000)
Pre-Leased SF (000)
Pre-Leased %
Rank
All Existing
Under Constr
Rank
1
Union Square
1
264
39
14.7%
2
20,815
263,640
1
2
Redwood City
1
8
0
0%
3
8,176
8,376
2
3
Mission/Potrero
1
6
6
100%
1
6,784
5,771
3
4
Bayview/Hunters Point
0
-
-
-
-
5,578
-
-
5
Belmont/San Carlos
0
-
-
-
-
6,299
-
-
6
Brisbane/Daly City
0
-
-
-
-
12,131
-
-
7
Burlingame
0
-
-
-
-
8,708
-
-
8
Civic Center
0
-
-
-
-
7,827
-
-
9
Financial District
0
-
-
-
-
9,581
-
-
10
Foster City/Redwood Shrs
0
-
-
-
-
21,815
-
-
All Other
0
-
-
-
7,379
-
3
278
44
16.0%
7,780
92,596
Totals
Copyrighted report licensed to COMPASS - 1028085
2/22/2021 Page 12
Under Construction Properties San Francisco Retail Properties
Square Feet
Percent of Inventory
Preleased
5
505,423
0.6%
53.8%
UNDER CONSTRUCTION PROPERTIES
UNDER CONSTRUCTION Property Name/Address
1 2 3 4 5
100 Stockton St Whole Foods/Sports Bas… 3251 20th Ave 925 Main St 200 Linden Ave Mission Kids Co-op 969 Treat Ave
Rating
Bldg SF
Stories
Start
Complete
263,640
8
Jan 2019
Jul 2021
221,433
3
Aug 2018
Apr 2021
8,376
2
Dec 2018
Mar 2021
6,203
7
Nov 2018
Jun 2021
5,771
2
Jun 2019
Sep 2021
Copyrighted report licensed to COMPASS - 1028085
Developer/Owner
Morgan Stanley Services Group I… Brookfield Properties Retail Group Brookfield Property REIT Inc. Tim & Denise Rust Tim & Denise Rust Omni Investment Group Mission Kids Co-Op Mission Kids Co-Op
2/22/2021 Page 13
Sales San Francisco Retail San Francisco's retail sales market remained strong through the 2010's expansion and led to some unique acquisition and redevelopment opportunities. The trend of repurposing underperforming malls has likely been accelerated by the pandemic and business shutdowns. Sales volume slowed dramatically in 2020 as uncertainty weighed on investors and lenders, with annual sales volume about half that of 2019. Investors still see opportunities in assets that could benefit from repositioning. In November, Presidio Bay Ventures and Kinship Capital acquired an auto dealership from a private individual for about $37 million ($300/SF). The joint venture plans to redevelop the property into a 123,000 SF, Class A life science building that could break ground by the end of 2021. The auto dealership plans to relocate to another site. Even in the pandemic, some noteworthy deals have closed. Roughly one year after initially purchasing a brand-new building from its developer, local investment firm TMG Partners and Alexandria Real Estate Equities sold the vacant 6x6 mall on Market St. to Ingka Centres,
the real estate arm of Ikea. The sellers acquired the mall for $179 million in 2019 and sold it a year later for $198 million, or $774/SF. The developer, Dallas-based Cypress Equities, completed the project in 2017 and had repositioned some of its space for office use, but the building remained vacant and available until the Ingka Centre's purchase. The average market price in San Francisco is currently over $640/SF, well above its pre-2010 peak and among the highest in the nation. However, average pricing across the metro, based on the estimated value of all properties in the market, is trending lower as cap rates inch upwards and rents face downward pressure. The market's average cap rate of 4.5% ranks as one of the lowest in the country and has not budged materially higher, despite weaker fundamentals and the deterioration of rent growth. Investors will need to reassess their projections for future cash flows and property performance, as the coronavirus recession still dampers the near term outlook for underwriting assumptions.
SALES VOLUME & MARKET SALE PRICE PER SF
Copyrighted report licensed to COMPASS - 1028085
2/22/2021 Page 14
Sales San Francisco Retail MARKET CAP RATE
Copyrighted report licensed to COMPASS - 1028085
2/22/2021 Page 15
Sales Past 12 Months San Francisco Retail Sale Comparables
Avg. Cap Rate
Avg. Price/SF
Avg. Vacancy At Sale
144
4.7%
$619
9.8%
SALE COMPARABLE LOCATIONS
SALE COMPARABLES SUMMARY STATISTICS Sales Attributes
Low
Average
Median
High
$140,396
$5,549,700
$2,250,000
$198,001,200
Price/SF
$30
$619
$581
$6,434
Cap Rate
1.3%
4.7%
4.5%
8.4%
Time Since Sale in Months
0.1
6.2
5.9
12.0
Property Attributes
Low
Average
Median
High
Building SF
600
8,775
4,191
255,765
1
2
2
7
Typical Floor SF
600
5,330
2,513
63,078
Vacancy Rate At Sale
0%
9.8%
0%
100%
1890
1936
1927
2018
Sale Price
Stories
Year Built Star Rating
2.1
Copyrighted report licensed to COMPASS - 1028085
2/22/2021 Page 16
Sales Past 12 Months San Francisco Retail RECENT SIGNIFICANT SALES Property Property Name - Address
1
6X6 935-965 Market St
2
Lucky 1322 El Camino Real
3
Lucky Supermarket 6843 Mission St
4
1906-1950 El Camino Real
5
Lucky Market 1135 Old County Rd
6
775 Serramonte Blvd
7
870 Santa Cruz Ave
8
851 Old County Rd
9
4200 Geary Blvd
10
803 Old County Rd
11
1200-1250 El Camino Real
12
2838 S El Camino Real
13
414-432 Sutter St
14
1175 Fell St
14
1175 Fell St
15
231-233 Grant Ave
16
616 S B St
17
3512 16th St
18
Bank Of The Orient 317-319 6th Ave
19
776-780 Valencia St
Sale
Rating
Yr Built
Bldg SF
Vacancy
Sale Date
Price
Price/SF
Cap Rate
-
2017
255,765
77.6%
9/4/2020
$198,001,200
$774
-
-
1989
56,280
0%
11/20/2020
$31,000,000
$551
-
-
-
63,078
0%
11/20/2020
$27,000,000
$428
-
-
-
35,799
0%
3/23/2020
$20,340,885
$568
-
-
2000
44,000
0%
11/20/2020
$20,087,500
$457
-
-
-
38,087
0%
3/24/2020
$18,190,000
$478
-
-
1900
22,500
0%
12/15/2020
$18,100,000
$804
-
-
-
18,253
0%
5/1/2020
$10,723,505
$587
-
-
1918
16,882
0%
5/13/2020
$10,500,000
$622
-
-
1975
7,650
0%
4/29/2020
$10,000,000
$1,307
-
-
1999
8,014
0%
5/29/2020
$9,550,000
$1,192
4.6%
-
-
21,700
0%
12/22/2020
$9,100,000
$419
-
-
1909
12,668
0%
9/30/2020
$9,000,000
$710
-
-
1968
1,360
0%
12/15/2020
$8,750,000
$6,434
4.5%
-
1968
1,360
0%
7/17/2020
$8,300,000
$6,103
-
-
1907
11,000
31.6%
8/13/2020
$7,480,000
$680
-
-
-
7,150
0%
2/11/2021
$7,350,000
$1,028
-
-
1915
8,729
0%
3/30/2020
$7,300,000
$836
-
-
1975
6,592
0%
6/5/2020
$6,950,000
$1,054
4.6%
-
1924
6,200
0%
3/18/2020
$6,800,000
$1,097
7.7%
Copyrighted report licensed to COMPASS - 1028085
2/22/2021 Page 17
Economy San Francisco Retail San Francisco's economy grew rapidly in the 2010's expansion cycle and maintained strength heading into 2020 before the coronavirus pandemic hit. Annual job growth prevailed at 3% in February, but social distancing measures have caused significant economic disruption, leading to the sharpest employment downturn on record and a migration out of the city. Layoffs and furloughs in the hospitality, restaurant, retail, and entertainment sectors were severe. Professional employment sectors were also hit in the downturn, though not as sharply. A modest recovery of lost jobs ensued in May and gained steam in June as the measured reopening of San Francisco's economy helped drive a rebound. However, plans to reopen businesses were stalled as coronavirus cases climbed again. Outdoor dining and indoor retail were allowed, but the reopening of salons, bars, and museums initially planned for late June was paused, and the pace of job recovery has been uneven and weak as a result. Hotels, indoor malls, gyms, indoor restaurants, and hair and nail salons were finally allowed to open at a limited capacity in September. But, a resurgence of coronavirus cases in December led to a renewed shutdown of establishments, including all restaurant dining including outdoor patios and parklets, as well as nonessential office work. Public schools are distance learning, while entertainment venues including movie theaters, night clubs, and music halls have remained shuttered since the pandemic hit. Total employment in the metro division is down 9.1%, or by 109,000 as of December's jobs report released in January, while employment within typical office-using job sectors is still down 2.1% or by 10,200, from their prepandemic peaks reached in February. Start-ups in hardhit segments of the economy have slashed headcounts considerably, while mainstays like Google have slowed their rate of hiring and real estate expansions as ad revenue declines. Most industries are recovering now, though as the economy slowly reopens. Unemployment had fallen below 2% prior to the pandemic, according to the U.S. Department of Labor. Job opportunities were abundant and outnumbered qualified job seekers, but job listings have fallen dramatically over the past few months, and unemployment skyrocketed into the double-digits in the Springtime, ticking back to 5.4% as of November, but rising in December to 6.1%. The labor force has declined slightly since the pandemic hit due to a migration out of
the market. The trajectory of San Francisco's economy and commercial real estate markets will depend on how widely the virus and its variants spread, how quickly the vaccine is distributed, how long containment policies like social distancing need to be maintained, and how quickly those with lost jobs can find employment again. On the positive side, Oxford Economics projects that San Francisco's economic recovery will outpace most other markets due to its industry makeup. San Francisco does not rely as heavily on leisure & hospitality employment as Las Vegas, Orlando, or New Orleans does, but it is a popular tourist destination and will be negatively impacted by a slowdown in travel. Large tech firms reliant on advertising like Facebook and Google saw lower revenues in 20Q2, but have seen a rebound to new record levels. Google and Facebook capture the majority of all internet ad revenue and are well-positioned for an economic rebound. Internet ad revenue was rising at a 17% annual growth rate before the pandemic hit, according to the Interactive Advertising Bureau. Some digital products have seen soaring demand amid the pandemic. For example, communications platforms like Zoom Video and Microsoft Teams have become necessary tools for business survival, and Netflix has seen an influx of new subscribers. Business software investment growth overall has slowed a touch but continues to rise through the downturn, while ecommerce retail sales have spiked. Venture capitalists have invested heavily in locallybased start-ups, as well as mature, but still privatelyheld "unicorn" companies valued over $1 billion. Venture capital funding remained fairly robust in 2020 all things considered, but has faded from 2019 and 2018's recordsetting pace, according to PwC's MoneyTree Report, and may decline further if an uncertain economic environment shakes confidence among investors. A handful of VC firms are leaving for Texas, but Silicon Valley will remain the leading capital provider for start-ups as both are entrenched in the area, and feed off of its educational institutions, and mega tech and biotech firms. Locally based Okta, Roku, and Mulesoft each went public in 2017 with successful results, as did DocuSign and Survey Monkey in 2018. However, a number of Bay Area companies that went public in the 2010's economic expansion period are now trading below their initial IPO
Copyrighted report licensed to COMPASS - 1028085
2/22/2021 Page 18
Economy San Francisco Retail price. Fitbit, Lending Club, Cloudera, Dropbox, and Eventbrite have all seen their valuations deteriorate since going public, and 2020 was particularly rough for tech unicorns going public. The IPO's of Lyft, Uber, and Slack were considered flops, while market valuations for Pinterest and PagerDuty have declined after initially rising. Some local start-ups like Zoom Video did launch public offerings that performed well in 2019, but the majority were disappointing as high private market valuations, profitability concerns and the prospect of tighter regulations weighed on investors. AirBnB went public in December 2020 despite a loss in bookings due to the pandemic. AirBnB secured two billion-dollar loans in April at a slashed internal valuation as financial losses mounted, and laid off 1,900 employees or roughly a quarter of its global workforce in May. The travel company's stock soared at the onset of 2021 though, and they announced an expansion to Atlanta most recently.AirBnB's local staff had grown larger than 3,000 before the recent cuts. Despite the notable downturns among several highprofile newcomers, the NASDAQ index, which is heavily dominated by San Francisco Bay Area-based tech companies and correlates with local office using employment historically, has already recovered its coronavirus pandemic and oil shock sell-off losses of early 2020. Large-scale expansion plans from several publicly traded technology companies appear to have slowed, yet remain intact, though it will be critical to watch how the fallout from the pandemic and mobile work adoption affects the tech sector and local real estate demand moving forward. Emblematic of San Francisco's transition to a tech industry-led economy, Salesforce surpassed Wells Fargo as the city's largest employer in 2018. The customer relationship management software company continued to grow its headcount after taking occupancy in the recently delivered Salesforce Tower, but in a sign of the times, announced the adoption of remote work options. Salesforce now employs more than 9,000 based in San Francisco. Led by tech firms, roughly 350,000 jobs were created in the metro division in the 2010's economic expansion period, including more than 35,000 jobs added in 2019. On a national scale, coronavirus recession job losses wiped out all gains made in the 2010's expansion cycle, but job growth was so strong in San Francisco over the past decade, the market did not give up all of its expansion cycle gains in the recent downturn.
Facebook has added capacity for well over 5,000 employees at 181 Fremont Street and Park Tower at Transbay, two new skyscrapers recently completed in the South Financial District. Lyft, Dropbox, and Affirm more than doubled their headcounts in the past several years. Uber had aggressively increased its San Francisco headcount to more than 5,000, but rising profitability concerns led to recent job cuts, including several hundred throughout the Bay Area in the second half of 2019, and the elimination of 6,700 positions globally or 25% of its workforce and shuttering of 25 offices including Pier 70's in 2020 in response to the coronavirus pandemic and economic downfall that hit the company. In the finance sector, Wells Fargo's employment in the Bay Area has declined moderately for several years. Wells closed its historic Crocker building branch in late 2019 and may eventually move its headquarters out of town. Charles Schwab has also relocated many positions to lower-cost markets and reassigned its headquarters to Dallas effective 2021, in conjunction with its acquisition of TD Ameritrade, but still maintains a downtown office. Fintech start-ups like SoFi, Affirm, and Lending Club had been a bright spot, boosting employment within the sector, which was gaining momentum heading into 2020 since stagnating in 2017. However, even financial service firms have suffered losses in the coronavirus -pandemic recession. Lending Club laid off 460 employees in April 2020, accounting for 30% of its workforce. The local finance sector was devastated in the dot-com crash and slowly recovered from 2007–09 credit crisis consolidations. Employment in financial activities finally rose above its 2007 prerecession peak late in the 2010's economic expansion cycle, but never returned to levels achieved in the 1990's. San Francisco's economy was roaring ahead into 2020, as it typically does in expansion periods. Professional and business services - by far the market's largest employment and office using sector - was expanding by more than 3% annually before the coronavirus pandemic hit in March. Since the city's early gold rush founding, San Francisco has experienced rapid booms and busts, and the pandemic recession has once again impacted the local economy sharply, as history repeats itself. Based on rapid rent and pricing gains during the expansion, pockets of commercial real estate contained a heightened vulnerability to a downfall.
Copyrighted report licensed to COMPASS - 1028085
2/22/2021 Page 19
Economy San Francisco Retail Access to cheap capital and an expanding global economy led by technological advancements drove Bay Area commercial real estate markets to new heights over the past decade. Changes in trade policy and slowing global growth presented headwinds to the economy in the mature phases of the expansion cycle, but the lingering shutdown in response to the coronavirus pandemic has sent the country into a deep and rapid recession. The success of mitigation efforts and federal bailouts, in addition to behavior changes in response to the pandemic, will have a profound impact on national economic recovery and commercial real estate demand.
Real estate investment trusts have stockpiled cash amid the uncertain economic times and lenders were swamped by small-business owners looking for relief as emergency actions in response to the coronavirus closed down tens of thousands of restaurants, bars, theaters, gyms and stores across the country. Business closures in San Francisco are already elevated well above that of other metro's according to Yelp, and the Bay Area is still slowly opening in the new year following a second surge of coronavirus cases. Non-essential workers are advised to remain away from offices again, and most are planning for a potential return in the summer of 2021 at this point. We will be updating our analysis as more information becomes available.
SAN FRANCISCO EMPLOYMENT BY INDUSTRY IN THOUSANDS Current Level
12 Month Change
10 Year Change
5 Year Forecast
NAICS Industry
Jobs
LQ
Market
US
Market
US
Market
US
Manufacturing
37
0.4
-6.31%
-4.05%
0.51%
0.59%
0.56%
0.53%
Trade, Transportation and Utilities
142
0.7
-7.09%
-3.01%
1.29%
0.86%
1.35%
0.61%
73
0.6
-6.10%
-3.10%
-0.05%
0.42%
1.28%
0.70%
Financial Activities
90
1.3
0.88%
-0.99%
2.55%
1.29%
0.09%
0.74%
Government
118
0.7
-9.83%
-5.42%
-0.12%
-0.35%
1.87%
0.99%
Natural Resources, Mining and Construction
42
0.7
-3.38%
-3.37%
4.49%
2.59%
1.80%
1.14%
Education and Health Services
141
0.8
-4.11%
-3.89%
2.23%
1.56%
1.82%
1.87%
Professional and Business Services
291
1.8
-2.31%
-4.23%
4.84%
1.87%
1.98%
1.63%
Information
95
4.6
-6.15%
-6.86%
9.44%
0.02%
4.39%
2.28%
Leisure and Hospitality
106
1.0
-29.33%
-18.15%
-0.66%
0.35%
7.32%
4.38%
Other Services
37
0.9
-13.47%
-6.68%
0.66%
0.33%
2.92%
1.37%
1,098
1.0
-8.01%
-5.55%
2.51%
0.92%
2.48%
1.49%
Retail Trade
Total Employment
Source: Oxford Economics LQ = Location Quotient
Copyrighted report licensed to COMPASS - 1028085
2/22/2021 Page 20
Economy San Francisco Retail YEAR OVER YEAR JOB GROWTH
Source: Oxford Economics
DEMOGRAPHIC TRENDS Current Level Demographic Category
12 Month Change
10 Year Change
5 Year Forecast
Metro
US
Metro
US
Metro
US
Metro
US
1,656,102
330,665,094
0.3%
0.5%
0.8%
0.6%
0.3%
0.5%
Households
627,954
123,592,047
0.3%
0.4%
0.5%
0.7%
0.3%
0.5%
Median Household Income
$127,226
$69,274
1.4%
4.4%
4.6%
3.3%
3.9%
2.1%
Labor Force
997,831
160,791,656
-5.2%
-2.1%
1.3%
0.5%
2.2%
0.8%
5.9%
6.7%
3.8%
3.0%
-0.2%
-0.3%
-
-
Population
Unemployment
Source: Oxford Economics
POPULATION GROWTH
LABOR FORCE GROWTH
INCOME GROWTH
Source: Oxford Economics
Copyrighted report licensed to COMPASS - 1028085
2/22/2021 Page 21
Submarkets San Francisco Retail SAN FRANCISCO SUBMARKETS
Copyrighted report licensed to COMPASS - 1028085
2/22/2021 Page 22
Submarkets San Francisco Retail SUBMARKET INVENTORY Inventory No.
Submarket
12 Month Deliveries
Under Construction
Bldgs
SF (000)
% Market
Rank
Bldgs
SF (000)
Percent
Rank
Bldgs
SF (000)
Percent
Rank
1
Bayview/Hunters Point
143
798
1.0%
19
0
0
0%
-
0
-
-
-
2
Belmont/San Carlos
374
2,356
2.9%
13
0
0
0%
-
0
-
-
-
3
Brisbane/Daly City
449
5,447
6.6%
5
0
0
0%
-
0
-
-
-
4
Burlingame
262
2,282
2.8%
14
0
0
0%
-
0
-
-
-
5
Civic Center
38
297
0.4%
27
0
0
0%
-
0
-
-
-
6
Financial District
74
709
0.9%
21
0
0
0%
-
0
-
-
-
7
Foster City/Redwood Shrs
35
764
0.9%
20
0
0
0%
-
0
-
-
-
8
Jackson Square
32
299
0.4%
26
0
0
0%
-
0
-
-
-
9
Menlo Park
227
1,864
2.3%
16
0
0
0%
-
0
-
-
-
10
MidMarket
39
598
0.7%
22
0
0
0%
-
0
-
-
-
11
Mission Bay/China Basin
29
509
0.6%
23
0
0
0%
-
0
-
-
-
12
Mission/Potrero
989
6,710
8.2%
4
0
0
0%
-
1
6
0.1%
3
13
Peninsula Coastline
322
3,103
3.8%
9
1
3
0.1%
2
0
-
-
-
14
Redwood City
500
4,088
5.0%
7
0
0
0%
-
1
8
0.2%
2
15
Rincon/South Beach
36
423
0.5%
24
0
0
0%
-
0
-
-
-
16
San Bruno/Millbrae
416
3,721
4.5%
8
0
0
0%
-
0
-
-
-
17
San Mateo
541
5,139
6.3%
6
0
0
0%
-
0
-
-
-
18
Showplace Square
29
1,117
1.4%
18
0
0
0%
-
0
-
-
-
19
South Financial District
20
322
0.4%
25
0
0
0%
-
0
-
-
-
20
South of Market
191
1,736
2.1%
17
0
0
0%
-
0
-
-
-
21
South San Francisco
259
2,794
3.4%
11
1
50
1.8%
1
0
-
-
-
22
Southern City
1,921
9,060
11.1%
2
0
0
0%
-
0
-
-
-
23
Treasure/Yerba Buena Isl…
4
56
0.1%
28
0
0
0%
-
0
-
-
-
24
Union Square
142
2,956
3.6%
10
0
0
0%
-
1
264
8.9%
1
25
Van Ness/Chinatown
875
6,883
8.4%
3
0
0
0%
-
0
-
-
-
26
Waterfront/North Beach
255
2,730
3.3%
12
0
0
0%
-
0
-
-
-
27
West of Van Ness
2,302
13,184
16.1%
1
0
0
0%
-
0
-
-
-
28
Yerba Buena
34
2,038
2.5%
15
0
0
0%
-
0
-
-
-
Copyrighted report licensed to COMPASS - 1028085
2/22/2021 Page 23
Submarkets San Francisco Retail SUBMARKET RENT Market Rent No.
12 Month Market Rent
QTD Annualized Market Rent
Submarket
Per SF
Rank
Growth
Rank
Growth
Rank
1
Bayview/Hunters Point
$23.05
27
-4.8%
28
-9.0%
28
2
Belmont/San Carlos
$37.46
21
-3.9%
20
-6.8%
13
3
Brisbane/Daly City
$39.08
18
-3.3%
12
-7.0%
20
4
Burlingame
$45.38
11
-3.8%
19
-6.7%
8
5
Civic Center
$50.62
7
-4.1%
23
-7.0%
18
6
Financial District
$59.28
2
-3.7%
18
-7.0%
17
7
Foster City/Redwood Shrs
$43.90
12
-2.9%
5
-6.7%
7
8
Jackson Square
$50.72
6
-3.2%
11
-6.6%
5
9
Menlo Park
$47.35
9
-4.1%
22
-7.3%
24
10
MidMarket
$42.78
14
-3.0%
8
-6.7%
10
11
Mission Bay/China Basin
$42.39
16
-2.9%
4
-6.9%
15
12
Mission/Potrero
$43.14
13
-4.1%
21
-7.1%
22
13
Peninsula Coastline
$32.61
24
-3.7%
17
-7.4%
25
14
Redwood City
$35.71
23
-4.6%
27
-7.7%
26
15
Rincon/South Beach
$42.66
15
-3.1%
9
-6.7%
6
16
San Bruno/Millbrae
$36.74
22
-3.5%
14
-7.0%
21
17
San Mateo
$37.77
20
-3.4%
13
-6.6%
3
18
Showplace Square
$37.81
19
-2.7%
3
-6.6%
4
19
South Financial District
$52.82
5
-2.9%
6
-6.8%
12
20
South of Market
$30.96
25
-3.5%
15
-6.9%
16
21
South San Francisco
$29.11
26
-4.4%
26
-8.1%
27
22
Southern City
$39.70
17
-4.4%
24
-7.1%
23
23
Treasure/Yerba Buena Isl…
$5.45
28
-0.5%
1
-0.8%
1
24
Union Square
$58.61
3
-2.9%
7
-6.7%
9
25
Van Ness/Chinatown
$46.20
10
-3.7%
16
-6.8%
14
26
Waterfront/North Beach
$71.94
1
-3.2%
10
-6.7%
11
27
West of Van Ness
$49.39
8
-4.4%
25
-7.0%
19
28
Yerba Buena
$56.25
4
-2.6%
2
-6.5%
2
Copyrighted report licensed to COMPASS - 1028085
2/22/2021 Page 24
Submarkets San Francisco Retail SUBMARKET VACANCY & NET ABSORPTION Vacancy No.
Submarket
12 Month Absorption
SF
Percent
Rank
SF
% of Inv
Rank
Construc. Ratio
1
Bayview/Hunters Point
38,579
4.8%
17
(1,406)
-0.2%
7
-
2
Belmont/San Carlos
90,258
3.8%
14
(57,204)
-2.4%
21
-
3
Brisbane/Daly City
89,520
1.6%
4
21,114
0.4%
3
-
4
Burlingame
67,797
3.0%
10
(13,715)
-0.6%
16
-
5
Civic Center
21,470
7.2%
19
(6,453)
-2.2%
10
-
6
Financial District
22,427
3.2%
11
(4,029)
-0.6%
8
-
7
Foster City/Redwood Shrs
113,880
14.9%
26
(11,628)
-1.5%
15
-
8
Jackson Square
14,521
4.9%
18
(9,852)
-3.3%
13
-
9
Menlo Park
37,599
2.0%
5
(10,838)
-0.6%
14
-
10
MidMarket
231,652
38.8%
27
2,112
0.4%
4
-
11
Mission Bay/China Basin
1,776
0.3%
1
(1,016)
-0.2%
6
-
12
Mission/Potrero
185,356
2.8%
7
(75,589)
-1.1%
23
-
13
Peninsula Coastline
43,190
1.4%
3
(8,626)
-0.3%
12
-
14
Redwood City
197,676
4.8%
16
(82,405)
-2.0%
24
-
15
Rincon/South Beach
10,802
2.6%
6
(6,518)
-1.5%
11
-
16
San Bruno/Millbrae
368,381
9.9%
23
(302,586)
-8.1%
28
-
17
San Mateo
494,994
9.6%
21
(128,638)
-2.5%
26
-
18
Showplace Square
32,990
3.0%
8
(21,119)
-1.9%
17
-
19
South Financial District
36,745
11.4%
25
28,015
8.7%
2
-
20
South of Market
74,609
4.3%
15
(42,373)
-2.4%
19
-
21
South San Francisco
235,815
8.4%
20
51,763
1.9%
1
1.0
22
Southern City
313,331
3.5%
12
(43,134)
-0.5%
20
-
23
Treasure/Yerba Buena Isl…
-
-
-
0
0%
-
-
24
Union Square
286,217
9.7%
22
(40,760)
-1.4%
18
-
25
Van Ness/Chinatown
249,065
3.6%
13
(57,657)
-0.8%
22
-
26
Waterfront/North Beach
271,937
10.0%
24
(82,475)
-3.0%
25
-
27
West of Van Ness
391,311
3.0%
9
(146,163)
-1.1%
27
-
28
Yerba Buena
23,467
1.2%
2
(4,378)
-0.2%
9
-
Copyrighted report licensed to COMPASS - 1028085
2/22/2021 Page 25
Supply & Demand Trends San Francisco Retail OVERALL SUPPLY & DEMAND Inventory
Net Absorption
Year
SF
SF Growth
% Growth
SF
% of Inv
Construction Ratio
2025
81,837,240
(53,831)
-0.1%
(72,494)
-0.1%
-
2024
81,891,071
(48,766)
-0.1%
(27,117)
0%
-
2023
81,939,837
(119,962)
-0.1%
95,205
0.1%
-
2022
82,059,799
(208,098)
-0.3%
388,686
0.5%
-
2021
82,267,897
349,454
0.4%
(650,777)
-0.8%
-
YTD
81,918,443
0
0%
(323,905)
-0.4%
-
2020
81,918,443
1,454
0%
(833,866)
-1.0%
-
2019
81,916,989
(393,783)
-0.5%
(572,078)
-0.7%
-
2018
82,310,772
(312,313)
-0.4%
(819,152)
-1.0%
-
2017
82,623,085
416,237
0.5%
137,195
0.2%
3.0
2016
82,206,848
81,298
0.1%
(11,729)
0%
-
2015
82,125,550
(256,574)
-0.3%
(256,638)
-0.3%
-
2014
82,382,124
(34,684)
0%
186,925
0.2%
-
2013
82,416,808
(176,329)
-0.2%
388,457
0.5%
-
2012
82,593,137
(315,069)
-0.4%
(204,187)
-0.2%
-
2011
82,908,206
(3,294)
0%
(45,172)
-0.1%
-
2010
82,911,500
19,598
0%
184,868
0.2%
0.1
2009
82,891,902
400,344
0.5%
97,361
0.1%
4.1
MALLS SUPPLY & DEMAND Inventory
Net Absorption
Year
SF
SF Growth
% Growth
SF
% of Inv
Construction Ratio
2025
5,060,782
(43,929)
-0.9%
(84,719)
-1.7%
-
2024
5,104,711
(42,406)
-0.8%
(84,625)
-1.7%
-
2023
5,147,117
(100,657)
-1.9%
(52,984)
-1.0%
-
2022
5,247,774
(181,769)
-3.3%
53,978
1.0%
-
2021
5,429,543
348,575
6.9%
54,008
1.0%
6.5
YTD
5,080,968
0
0%
(250,223)
-4.9%
-
2020
5,080,968
0
0%
(25,394)
-0.5%
-
2019
5,080,968
91,485
1.8%
(84,936)
-1.7%
-
2018
4,989,483
0
0%
36,184
0.7%
0
2017
4,989,483
421,313
9.2%
207,141
4.2%
2.0
2016
4,568,170
0
0%
(24,084)
-0.5%
-
2015
4,568,170
0
0%
(9,902)
-0.2%
-
2014
4,568,170
0
0%
98,952
2.2%
0
2013
4,568,170
0
0%
(47,606)
-1.0%
-
2012
4,568,170
0
0%
53,214
1.2%
0
2011
4,568,170
0
0%
(100,950)
-2.2%
-
2010
4,568,170
0
0%
14,089
0.3%
0
2009
4,568,170
0
0%
(20,572)
-0.5%
-
Copyrighted report licensed to COMPASS - 1028085
2/22/2021 Page 26
Supply & Demand Trends San Francisco Retail POWER CENTER SUPPLY & DEMAND Inventory
Net Absorption
Year
SF
SF Growth
% Growth
SF
% of Inv
Construction Ratio
2025
2,282,725
0
0%
3,838
0.2%
0
2024
2,282,725
0
0%
11,326
0.5%
0
2023
2,282,725
0
0%
21,878
1.0%
0
2022
2,282,725
0
0%
5,179
0.2%
0
2021
2,282,725
0
0%
(29,520)
-1.3%
-
YTD
2,282,725
0
0%
10,493
0.5%
0
2020
2,282,725
0
0%
(66,631)
-2.9%
-
2019
2,282,725
0
0%
24,365
1.1%
0
2018
2,282,725
0
0%
(35,075)
-1.5%
-
2017
2,282,725
0
0%
67,589
3.0%
0
2016
2,282,725
0
0%
(166,733)
-7.3%
-
2015
2,282,725
0
0%
(3,847)
-0.2%
-
2014
2,282,725
0
0%
10,334
0.5%
0
2013
2,282,725
0
0%
60,290
2.6%
0
2012
2,282,725
0
0%
(37,882)
-1.7%
-
2011
2,282,725
6,000
0.3%
11,719
0.5%
0.5
2010
2,276,725
0
0%
3,883
0.2%
0
2009
2,276,725
0
0%
142,906
6.3%
0
NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER SUPPLY & DEMAND Inventory
Net Absorption
Year
SF
SF Growth
% Growth
SF
% of Inv
Construction Ratio
2025
7,646,645
(359)
0%
13,925
0.2%
-
2024
7,647,004
(242)
0%
24,748
0.3%
-
2023
7,647,246
(612)
0%
64,530
0.8%
-
2022
7,647,858
(948)
0%
31,340
0.4%
-
2021
7,648,806
(681)
0%
(114,069)
-1.5%
-
YTD
7,649,487
0
0%
(5,158)
-0.1%
-
2020
7,649,487
0
0%
(240,536)
-3.1%
-
2019
7,649,487
7,209
0.1%
12,152
0.2%
0.6
2018
7,642,278
0
0%
(94,674)
-1.2%
-
2017
7,642,278
0
0%
43,390
0.6%
0
2016
7,642,278
0
0%
48,330
0.6%
0
2015
7,642,278
17,635
0.2%
17,365
0.2%
1.0
2014
7,624,643
67,877
0.9%
55,986
0.7%
1.2
2013
7,556,766
0
0%
17,590
0.2%
0
2012
7,556,766
0
0%
8,127
0.1%
0
2011
7,556,766
37,460
0.5%
97,794
1.3%
0.4
2010
7,519,306
0
0%
1,624
0%
0
2009
7,519,306
239,683
3.3%
118,850
1.6%
2.0
Copyrighted report licensed to COMPASS - 1028085
2/22/2021 Page 27
Supply & Demand Trends San Francisco Retail STRIP CENTER SUPPLY & DEMAND Inventory
Net Absorption
Year
SF
SF Growth
% Growth
SF
% of Inv
Construction Ratio
2025
1,826,960
0
0%
(852)
0%
-
2024
1,826,960
0
0%
62
0%
0
2023
1,826,960
0
0%
1,863
0.1%
0
2022
1,826,960
0
0%
5,691
0.3%
0
2021
1,826,960
0
0%
(22,033)
-1.2%
-
YTD
1,826,960
0
0%
(6,493)
-0.4%
-
2020
1,826,960
0
0%
(25,177)
-1.4%
-
2019
1,826,960
0
0%
9,428
0.5%
0
2018
1,826,960
0
0%
10,074
0.6%
0
2017
1,826,960
11,661
0.6%
(12,248)
-0.7%
-
2016
1,815,299
0
0%
27,355
1.5%
0
2015
1,815,299
9,700
0.5%
2,903
0.2%
3.3
2014
1,805,599
0
0%
33,188
1.8%
0
2013
1,805,599
2,403
0.1%
25,668
1.4%
0.1
2012
1,803,196
0
0%
7,140
0.4%
0
2011
1,803,196
0
0%
(4,127)
-0.2%
-
2010
1,803,196
12,349
0.7%
36,992
2.1%
0.3
2009
1,790,847
14,000
0.8%
(19,707)
-1.1%
-
GENERAL RETAIL SUPPLY & DEMAND Inventory
Net Absorption
Year
SF
SF Growth
% Growth
SF
% of Inv
Construction Ratio
2025
63,927,770
(9,446)
0%
(4,521)
0%
-
2024
63,937,216
(6,083)
0%
20,851
0%
-
2023
63,943,299
(18,514)
0%
57,608
0.1%
-
2022
63,961,813
(25,019)
0%
288,106
0.5%
-
2021
63,986,832
1,831
0%
(528,835)
-0.8%
-
YTD
63,985,001
0
0%
(72,524)
-0.1%
-
2020
63,985,001
1,454
0%
(470,139)
-0.7%
-
2019
63,983,547
(492,477)
-0.8%
(533,087)
-0.8%
-
2018
64,476,024
(312,313)
-0.5%
(725,169)
-1.1%
-
2017
64,788,337
(16,737)
0%
(162,602)
-0.3%
-
2016
64,805,074
81,298
0.1%
98,998
0.2%
0.8
2015
64,723,776
(283,909)
-0.4%
(270,729)
-0.4%
-
2014
65,007,685
(102,561)
-0.2%
(16,551)
0%
-
2013
65,110,246
(178,732)
-0.3%
308,872
0.5%
-
2012
65,288,978
(315,069)
-0.5%
(250,307)
-0.4%
-
2011
65,604,047
(46,754)
-0.1%
(55,156)
-0.1%
-
2010
65,650,801
7,249
0%
106,913
0.2%
0.1
2009
65,643,552
146,661
0.2%
(82,132)
-0.1%
-
Copyrighted report licensed to COMPASS - 1028085
2/22/2021 Page 28
Supply & Demand Trends San Francisco Retail OTHER SUPPLY & DEMAND Inventory
Net Absorption
Year
SF
SF Growth
% Growth
SF
% of Inv
Construction Ratio
2025
1,092,358
(97)
0%
(165)
0%
-
2024
1,092,455
(35)
0%
521
0%
-
2023
1,092,490
(179)
0%
2,310
0.2%
-
2022
1,092,669
(362)
0%
4,392
0.4%
-
2021
1,093,031
(271)
0%
(10,328)
-0.9%
-
YTD
1,093,302
0
0%
-
-
-
2020
1,093,302
0
0%
(5,989)
-0.5%
-
2019
1,093,302
0
0%
0
0%
-
2018
1,093,302
0
0%
(10,492)
-1.0%
-
2017
1,093,302
0
0%
(6,075)
-0.6%
-
2016
1,093,302
0
0%
4,405
0.4%
0
2015
1,093,302
0
0%
7,572
0.7%
0
2014
1,093,302
0
0%
5,016
0.5%
0
2013
1,093,302
0
0%
23,643
2.2%
0
2012
1,093,302
0
0%
15,521
1.4%
0
2011
1,093,302
0
0%
5,548
0.5%
0
2010
1,093,302
0
0%
21,367
2.0%
0
2009
1,093,302
0
0%
(41,984)
-3.8%
-
Copyrighted report licensed to COMPASS - 1028085
2/22/2021 Page 29
Rent & Vacancy San Francisco Retail OVERALL RENT & VACANCY Market Rent
Vacancy
Year
Per SF
Index
% Growth
Vs Hist Peak
SF
Percent
Ppts Chg
2025
$49.55
145
1.2%
10.2%
3,758,985
4.6%
0%
2024
$48.97
143
2.0%
8.9%
3,755,776
4.6%
-0.1%
2023
$48.03
140
3.7%
6.9%
3,799,379
4.6%
-0.3%
2022
$46.34
135
6.2%
3.1%
4,026,108
4.9%
-0.7%
2021
$43.63
127
-0.6%
-3.0%
4,622,175
5.6%
1.2%
YTD
$43.45
127
-1.0%
-3.3%
3,945,365
4.8%
0.4%
2020
$43.90
128
-2.3%
-2.3%
3,621,460
4.4%
1.0%
2019
$44.95
131
2.6%
0%
2,786,140
3.4%
0.2%
2018
$43.82
128
2.6%
-2.5%
2,650,663
3.2%
0.6%
2017
$42.71
125
3.2%
-5.0%
2,137,353
2.6%
0.3%
2016
$41.40
121
3.5%
-7.9%
1,857,241
2.3%
0.1%
2015
$39.99
117
5.4%
-11.0%
1,767,604
2.2%
0%
2014
$37.94
111
5.5%
-15.6%
1,767,540
2.1%
-0.3%
2013
$35.98
105
4.3%
-20.0%
1,989,149
2.4%
-0.7%
2012
$34.51
101
2.4%
-23.2%
2,553,935
3.1%
-0.1%
2011
$33.68
98
0.5%
-25.1%
2,664,817
3.2%
0.1%
2010
$33.52
98
0.4%
-25.4%
2,622,939
3.2%
-0.2%
2009
$33.40
97
-2.6%
-25.7%
2,788,209
3.4%
0.4%
MALLS RENT & VACANCY Market Rent
Vacancy
Year
Per SF
Index
% Growth
Vs Hist Peak
SF
Percent
Ppts Chg
2025
$52.80
151
0.8%
9.9%
510,320
10.1%
0.6%
2024
$52.39
150
1.5%
9.0%
481,633
9.4%
0.5%
2023
$51.62
148
3.2%
7.4%
457,942
8.9%
-0.8%
2022
$50.01
143
5.8%
4.1%
509,993
9.7%
-4.0%
2021
$47.28
135
-1.0%
-1.6%
745,693
13.7%
4.9%
YTD
$47.31
135
-0.9%
-1.6%
701,312
13.8%
4.9%
2020
$47.76
137
-0.6%
-0.6%
451,089
8.9%
0.5%
2019
$48.06
138
4.2%
0%
425,695
8.4%
3.4%
2018
$46.13
132
4.3%
-4.0%
249,274
5.0%
-0.7%
2017
$44.22
127
3.8%
-8.0%
285,458
5.7%
4.2%
2016
$42.59
122
3.1%
-11.4%
71,286
1.6%
0.8%
2015
$41.30
118
5.5%
-14.1%
35,702
0.8%
0.2%
2014
$39.15
112
5.6%
-18.6%
25,800
0.6%
-2.2%
2013
$37.07
106
4.6%
-22.9%
124,752
2.7%
1.0%
2012
$35.43
101
3.1%
-26.3%
77,146
1.7%
-1.2%
2011
$34.37
98
0.1%
-28.5%
130,360
2.9%
2.2%
2010
$34.33
98
0.8%
-28.6%
29,410
0.6%
-0.3%
2009
$34.05
97
-2.5%
-29.2%
43,499
1.0%
0.5%
Copyrighted report licensed to COMPASS - 1028085
2/22/2021 Page 30
Rent & Vacancy San Francisco Retail POWER CENTER RENT & VACANCY Market Rent
Vacancy
Year
Per SF
Index
% Growth
Vs Hist Peak
SF
Percent
Ppts Chg
2025
$48.54
152
1.0%
11.4%
196,770
8.6%
-0.2%
2024
$48.06
150
1.7%
10.3%
200,608
8.8%
-0.5%
2023
$47.24
148
3.4%
8.4%
211,934
9.3%
-1.0%
2022
$45.68
143
5.9%
4.8%
233,812
10.2%
-0.2%
2021
$43.11
135
-0.7%
-1.1%
238,991
10.5%
1.3%
YTD
$43.01
135
-1.0%
-1.3%
198,978
8.7%
-0.5%
2020
$43.42
136
-0.4%
-0.4%
209,471
9.2%
2.9%
2019
$43.58
136
4.2%
0%
142,840
6.3%
-1.1%
2018
$41.84
131
4.1%
-4.0%
167,205
7.3%
1.5%
2017
$40.18
126
3.9%
-7.8%
132,130
5.8%
-3.0%
2016
$38.67
121
3.2%
-11.2%
199,719
8.7%
7.3%
2015
$37.47
117
5.4%
-14.0%
32,986
1.4%
0.2%
2014
$35.53
111
5.6%
-18.5%
29,139
1.3%
-0.5%
2013
$33.64
105
4.5%
-22.8%
39,473
1.7%
-2.6%
2012
$32.20
101
2.8%
-26.1%
99,763
4.4%
1.7%
2011
$31.32
98
0.2%
-28.1%
61,881
2.7%
-0.3%
2010
$31.26
98
0.6%
-28.3%
67,600
3.0%
-0.2%
2009
$31.07
97
-2.8%
-28.7%
71,483
3.1%
-6.3%
NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER RENT & VACANCY Market Rent
Vacancy
Year
Per SF
Index
% Growth
Vs Hist Peak
SF
Percent
Ppts Chg
2025
$49.28
149
1.1%
10.9%
486,012
6.4%
-0.2%
2024
$48.76
148
1.8%
9.8%
500,191
6.5%
-0.3%
2023
$47.88
145
3.5%
7.8%
525,081
6.9%
-0.9%
2022
$46.25
140
6.0%
4.1%
590,136
7.7%
-0.4%
2021
$43.62
132
-0.7%
-1.8%
622,339
8.1%
1.5%
YTD
$43.49
132
-1.0%
-2.1%
514,055
6.7%
0.1%
2020
$43.92
133
-1.1%
-1.1%
508,897
6.7%
3.1%
2019
$44.43
135
4.1%
0%
268,361
3.5%
-0.1%
2018
$42.69
129
3.8%
-3.9%
273,304
3.6%
1.2%
2017
$41.12
125
4.2%
-7.4%
178,630
2.3%
-0.6%
2016
$39.47
120
3.2%
-11.1%
220,950
2.9%
-0.6%
2015
$38.26
116
5.4%
-13.9%
269,280
3.5%
0%
2014
$36.30
110
5.4%
-18.3%
269,010
3.5%
0.1%
2013
$34.43
104
4.3%
-22.5%
257,119
3.4%
-0.2%
2012
$33.01
100
2.5%
-25.7%
274,709
3.6%
-0.1%
2011
$32.19
98
0%
-27.5%
282,836
3.7%
-0.8%
2010
$32.18
97
0.3%
-27.6%
343,170
4.6%
0%
2009
$32.09
97
-2.8%
-27.8%
344,794
4.6%
1.5%
Copyrighted report licensed to COMPASS - 1028085
2/22/2021 Page 31
Rent & Vacancy San Francisco Retail STRIP CENTER RENT & VACANCY Market Rent
Vacancy
Year
Per SF
Index
% Growth
Vs Hist Peak
SF
Percent
Ppts Chg
2025
$40.79
145
1.3%
10.1%
62,861
3.4%
0%
2024
$40.29
143
2.0%
8.8%
62,009
3.4%
0%
2023
$39.50
140
3.7%
6.6%
62,071
3.4%
-0.1%
2022
$38.07
135
6.3%
2.8%
63,934
3.5%
-0.3%
2021
$35.81
127
-0.5%
-3.3%
69,625
3.8%
1.2%
YTD
$35.63
126
-1.0%
-3.8%
54,085
3.0%
0.4%
2020
$36.01
128
-2.8%
-2.8%
47,592
2.6%
1.4%
2019
$37.04
131
3.3%
0%
22,415
1.2%
-0.5%
2018
$35.84
127
3.1%
-3.2%
31,843
1.7%
-0.6%
2017
$34.75
123
4.3%
-6.2%
41,917
2.3%
1.3%
2016
$33.30
118
4.2%
-10.1%
18,008
1.0%
-1.5%
2015
$31.95
113
5.5%
-13.7%
45,363
2.5%
0.4%
2014
$30.27
107
5.2%
-18.3%
38,566
2.1%
-1.8%
2013
$28.78
102
4.1%
-22.3%
71,754
4.0%
-1.3%
2012
$27.65
98
2.0%
-25.3%
95,019
5.3%
-0.4%
2011
$27.10
96
0.1%
-26.8%
102,159
5.7%
0.2%
2010
$27.07
96
-1.1%
-26.9%
98,032
5.4%
-1.4%
2009
$27.37
97
-3.0%
-26.1%
122,675
6.9%
1.8%
GENERAL RETAIL RENT & VACANCY Market Rent
Vacancy
Year
Per SF
Index
% Growth
Vs Hist Peak
SF
Percent
Ppts Chg
2025
$47.95
143
1.2%
10.0%
2,460,572
3.8%
0%
2024
$47.36
141
2.0%
8.7%
2,468,962
3.9%
0%
2023
$46.42
138
3.7%
6.5%
2,499,427
3.9%
-0.1%
2022
$44.75
133
6.3%
2.7%
2,582,825
4.0%
-0.5%
2021
$42.10
125
-0.6%
-3.4%
2,895,373
4.5%
0.8%
YTD
$41.91
125
-1.0%
-3.8%
2,436,846
3.8%
0.1%
2020
$42.35
126
-2.8%
-2.8%
2,364,322
3.7%
0.7%
2019
$43.57
130
2.1%
0%
1,892,729
3.0%
0%
2018
$42.67
127
2.1%
-2.1%
1,894,937
2.9%
0.7%
2017
$41.78
124
2.9%
-4.1%
1,475,610
2.3%
0.2%
2016
$40.59
121
3.6%
-6.8%
1,329,745
2.1%
-0.1%
2015
$39.18
117
5.4%
-10.1%
1,362,335
2.1%
0%
2014
$37.18
111
5.4%
-14.7%
1,375,515
2.1%
-0.1%
2013
$35.27
105
4.2%
-19.1%
1,461,525
2.2%
-0.7%
2012
$33.83
101
2.4%
-22.4%
1,949,129
3.0%
-0.1%
2011
$33.05
98
0.6%
-24.1%
2,013,891
3.1%
0%
2010
$32.85
98
0.2%
-24.6%
2,005,489
3.1%
-0.2%
2009
$32.78
97
-2.5%
-24.8%
2,105,153
3.2%
0.3%
Copyrighted report licensed to COMPASS - 1028085
2/22/2021 Page 32
Rent & Vacancy San Francisco Retail OTHER RENT & VACANCY Market Rent
Vacancy
Year
Per SF
Index
% Growth
Vs Hist Peak
SF
Percent
Ppts Chg
2025
$145.68
158
1.2%
12.3%
42,450
3.9%
0%
2024
$144.00
156
1.9%
11.0%
42,373
3.9%
-0.1%
2023
$141.26
153
3.7%
8.8%
42,924
3.9%
-0.2%
2022
$136.27
148
6.2%
5.0%
45,408
4.2%
-0.4%
2021
$128.28
139
-0.5%
-1.2%
50,154
4.6%
0.9%
YTD
$127.73
138
-1.0%
-1.6%
40,089
3.7%
0%
2020
$128.96
140
-0.6%
-0.6%
40,089
3.7%
0.5%
2019
$129.78
141
4.1%
0%
34,100
3.1%
0%
2018
$124.63
135
4.3%
-4.0%
34,100
3.1%
1.0%
2017
$119.53
129
3.7%
-7.9%
23,608
2.2%
0.6%
2016
$115.25
125
3.1%
-11.2%
17,533
1.6%
-0.4%
2015
$111.77
121
5.4%
-13.9%
21,938
2.0%
-0.7%
2014
$106.04
115
5.9%
-18.3%
29,510
2.7%
-0.5%
2013
$100.13
108
4.3%
-22.8%
34,526
3.2%
-2.2%
2012
$95.98
104
2.6%
-26.0%
58,169
5.3%
-1.4%
2011
$93.54
101
0.2%
-27.9%
73,690
6.7%
-0.5%
2010
$93.32
101
2.9%
-28.1%
79,238
7.2%
-2.0%
2009
$90.69
98
-1.8%
-30.1%
100,605
9.2%
3.8%
Copyrighted report licensed to COMPASS - 1028085
2/22/2021 Page 33
Sale Trends San Francisco Retail OVERALL SALES Completed Transactions (1)
Market Pricing Trends (2)
Year
Deals
Volume
Turnover
Avg Price
Avg Price/SF
Avg Cap Rate
Price/SF
Price Index
Cap Rate
2025
-
-
-
-
-
-
$765.69
238
4.3%
2024
-
-
-
-
-
-
$753.88
234
4.3%
2023
-
-
-
-
-
-
$732.45
227
4.3%
2022
-
-
-
-
-
-
$694.04
216
4.3%
2021
-
-
-
-
-
-
$636.06
198
4.4%
YTD
15
$27.9M
0.1%
$2,558,100
$556.65
4.4%
$637.87
198
4.5%
2020
160
$774.1M
1.6%
$5,178,585
$593.45
4.6%
$640.22
199
4.5%
2019
540
$1.4B
4.2%
$6,302,009
$650.02
4.6%
$657.84
204
4.5%
2018
554
$621.8M
5.4%
$3,153,058
$614.73
4.5%
$629.72
196
4.5%
2017
635
$1B
5.7%
$5,135,032
$596.52
4.8%
$600.99
187
4.5%
2016
422
$895.9M
3.1%
$4,252,162
$493.91
4.7%
$583.98
181
4.6%
2015
532
$1.2B
4.9%
$5,426,765
$524.99
4.6%
$551.33
171
4.7%
2014
467
$661.3M
3.2%
$2,760,177
$433.71
5.3%
$478.91
149
5.0%
2013
577
$514.8M
3.8%
$1,935,298
$370.22
5.8%
$406.31
126
5.4%
2012
709
$963.1M
5.7%
$4,378,295
$438.12
6.3%
$380.56
118
5.5%
2011
383
$492.9M
3.7%
$3,123,981
$255.87
6.7%
$328.54
102
6.0%
2010
213
$226.7M
1.7%
$1,616,349
$218.61
5.9%
$303.03
94
6.3%
(1) Completed transaction data is based on actual arms-length sales transactions and levels are dependent on the mix of what happened to sell in the period. (2) Market price trends data is based on the estimated price movement of all properties in the market, informed by actual transactions that have occurred.
MALLS SALES Completed Transactions (1)
Market Pricing Trends (2)
Year
Deals
Volume
Turnover
Avg Price
Avg Price/SF
Avg Cap Rate
Price/SF
Price Index
Cap Rate
2025
-
-
-
-
-
-
$768.59
245
4.1%
2024
-
-
-
-
-
-
$758.53
242
4.1%
2023
-
-
-
-
-
-
$739.29
236
4.1%
2022
-
-
-
-
-
-
$702.04
224
4.1%
2021
-
-
-
-
-
-
$644.28
206
4.2%
YTD
-
-
-
-
-
-
$647.22
206
4.4%
2020
1
$198M
5.0%
$198,001,200
$774.15
-
$650.16
207
4.3%
2019
1
$179M
5.0%
$179,000,000
$699.86
-
$670.07
214
4.3%
2018
4
$0.00
31.7%
-
-
-
$638.73
204
4.3%
2017
4
$0.00
16.6%
-
-
-
$603.12
192
4.4%
2016
-
-
-
-
-
-
$583.69
186
4.4%
2015
3
$174.4M
18.7%
$174,400,000
$298.96
6.5%
$549.47
175
4.5%
2014
-
-
-
-
-
-
$475.37
152
4.9%
2013
-
-
-
-
-
-
$401.95
128
5.2%
2012
-
-
-
-
-
-
$374.52
119
5.4%
2011
3
$182.6M
18.0%
$60,866,930
$222.29
-
$320.67
102
5.8%
2010
-
-
-
-
-
-
$297.37
95
6.1%
(1) Completed transaction data is based on actual arms-length sales transactions and levels are dependent on the mix of what happened to sell in the period. (2) Market price trends data is based on the estimated price movement of all properties in the market, informed by actual transactions that have occurred.
Copyrighted report licensed to COMPASS - 1028085
2/22/2021 Page 34
Sale Trends San Francisco Retail POWER CENTER SALES Completed Transactions (1)
Market Pricing Trends (2)
Year
Deals
Volume
Turnover
Avg Price
Avg Price/SF
Avg Cap Rate
Price/SF
Price Index
Cap Rate
2025
-
-
-
-
-
-
$644.00
248
4.2%
2024
-
-
-
-
-
-
$635.71
245
4.2%
2023
-
-
-
-
-
-
$619.55
239
4.2%
2022
-
-
-
-
-
-
$588.56
227
4.3%
2021
-
-
-
-
-
-
$540.76
208
4.4%
YTD
-
-
-
-
-
-
$542.90
209
4.5%
2020
1
$31M
2.5%
$31,000,000
$550.82
-
$545.46
210
4.5%
2019
-
-
-
-
-
-
$559.23
216
4.4%
2018
-
-
-
-
-
-
$516.78
199
4.6%
2017
11
$124.1M
19.9%
$17,728,571
$545.15
-
$487.93
188
4.6%
2016
-
-
-
-
-
-
$463.14
178
4.7%
2015
5
$0.00
6.1%
-
-
-
$434.79
168
4.8%
2014
-
-
-
-
-
-
$382.02
147
5.1%
2013
6
$7.8M
8.5%
$7,800,000
$519.86
-
$329.46
127
5.5%
2012
4
$143.8M
14.6%
$35,937,500
$432.51
5.7%
$308.69
119
5.6%
2011
2
$16.2M
1.6%
$8,095,000
$437.83
7.2%
$270.74
104
6.0%
2010
2
$0.00
6.8%
-
-
-
$248.65
96
6.3%
(1) Completed transaction data is based on actual arms-length sales transactions and levels are dependent on the mix of what happened to sell in the period. (2) Market price trends data is based on the estimated price movement of all properties in the market, informed by actual transactions that have occurred.
NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER SALES Completed Transactions (1)
Market Pricing Trends (2)
Year
Deals
Volume
Turnover
Avg Price
Avg Price/SF
Avg Cap Rate
Price/SF
Price Index
2025
-
-
-
-
-
-
$678.22
247
Cap Rate
4.3%
2024
-
-
-
-
-
-
$668.70
244
4.3%
2023
-
-
-
-
-
-
$650.82
237
4.3%
2022
-
-
-
-
-
-
$617.45
225
4.3%
2021
-
-
-
-
-
-
$566.64
206
4.5%
YTD
-
-
-
-
-
-
$568.64
207
4.6%
2020
4
$68.3M
1.9%
$17,084,375
$473.00
-
$570.78
208
4.6%
2019
11
$186.6M
5.3%
$16,959,091
$462.94
-
$586.71
214
4.5%
2018
2
$56M
1.4%
$28,000,000
$526.23
5.2%
$551.51
201
4.6%
2017
8
$175.9M
3.3%
$21,989,209
$699.07
-
$513.41
187
4.7%
2016
5
$268.2M
6.5%
$53,640,000
$542.54
-
$488.87
178
4.8%
2015
8
$181.8M
5.0%
$22,729,438
$472.67
4.8%
$459.41
167
4.9%
2014
9
$59.8M
2.0%
$7,474,090
$408.93
-
$399.11
145
5.2%
2013
8
$66.4M
1.9%
$1,480,247
$460.48
-
$341.83
125
5.6%
2012
6
$51.5M
3.5%
$12,884,063
$247.36
7.5%
$321.73
117
5.8%
2011
5
$50.1M
1.6%
$12,517,578
$425.86
-
$281.95
103
6.2%
2010
-
-
-
-
-
-
$259.94
95
6.5%
(1) Completed transaction data is based on actual arms-length sales transactions and levels are dependent on the mix of what happened to sell in the period. (2) Market price trends data is based on the estimated price movement of all properties in the market, informed by actual transactions that have occurred.
Copyrighted report licensed to COMPASS - 1028085
2/22/2021 Page 35
Sale Trends San Francisco Retail STRIP CENTER SALES Completed Transactions (1)
Market Pricing Trends (2)
Year
Deals
Volume
Turnover
Avg Price
Avg Price/SF
Avg Cap Rate
Price/SF
Price Index
Cap Rate
2025
-
-
-
-
-
-
$635.43
228
4.4%
2024
-
-
-
-
-
-
$625.29
224
4.4%
2023
-
-
-
-
-
-
$607.53
218
4.4%
2022
-
-
-
-
-
-
$575.16
206
4.5%
2021
-
-
-
-
-
-
$526.87
189
4.6%
YTD
-
-
-
-
-
-
$530.51
190
4.7%
2020
1
$30K
0.1%
-
$30.00
-
$530.86
190
4.7%
2019
8
$37.8M
3.1%
$7,370,000
$815.84
3.5%
$539.61
194
4.6%
2018
4
$11.5M
1.5%
$5,757,086
$872.02
4.0%
$520.85
187
4.7%
2017
3
$3.7M
1.1%
$1,850,000
$355.77
4.4%
$493.36
177
4.7%
2016
3
$16.8M
1.3%
$5,607,500
$699.57
4.0%
$477.57
171
4.8%
2015
6
$15M
3.3%
$5,008,333
$527.30
5.1%
$452.98
162
4.9%
2014
4
$15.9M
2.1%
$3,975,000
$419.53
7.6%
$400.12
144
5.2%
2013
14
$9.7M
5.0%
$1,619,167
$275.21
-
$343.80
123
5.5%
2012
5
$8M
3.0%
$4,022,500
$372.99
6.5%
$323.25
116
5.7%
2011
2
$7M
1.1%
$3,512,500
$355.00
7.0%
$283.74
102
6.1%
2010
6
$19.4M
4.9%
$3,236,842
$222.00
7.8%
$262.64
94
6.4%
(1) Completed transaction data is based on actual arms-length sales transactions and levels are dependent on the mix of what happened to sell in the period. (2) Market price trends data is based on the estimated price movement of all properties in the market, informed by actual transactions that have occurred.
GENERAL RETAIL SALES Completed Transactions (1)
Market Pricing Trends (2)
Year
Deals
Volume
Turnover
Avg Price
Avg Price/SF
Avg Cap Rate
Price/SF
Price Index
2025
-
-
-
-
-
-
$780.28
236
Cap Rate
4.3%
2024
-
-
-
-
-
-
$767.94
233
4.3%
2023
-
-
-
-
-
-
$745.71
226
4.3%
2022
-
-
-
-
-
-
$706.37
214
4.3%
2021
-
-
-
-
-
-
$647.17
196
4.4%
YTD
15
$27.9M
0.1%
$2,558,100
$556.65
4.4%
$648.82
196
4.5%
2020
153
$476.7M
1.4%
$3,276,677
$562.92
4.6%
$651.17
197
4.5%
2019
520
$1B
4.3%
$4,882,462
$686.73
4.7%
$668.94
203
4.5%
2018
544
$554.3M
4.3%
$2,862,572
$621.48
4.5%
$642.09
194
4.5%
2017
609
$729.4M
4.9%
$3,939,352
$587.18
4.8%
$615.14
186
4.5%
2016
414
$610.8M
3.1%
$2,997,136
$471.53
4.7%
$599.44
182
4.5%
2015
510
$849.8M
4.0%
$3,968,959
$639.27
4.5%
$565.33
171
4.6%
2014
454
$585.6M
3.8%
$2,571,811
$436.81
5.2%
$490.96
149
5.0%
2013
549
$430.9M
4.1%
$1,931,757
$360.27
5.8%
$416.05
126
5.3%
2012
693
$759.7M
5.7%
$3,614,906
$464.41
6.3%
$389.57
118
5.5%
2011
371
$237M
3.1%
$1,606,705
$254.70
6.7%
$336.44
102
5.9%
2010
204
$188.3M
1.6%
$1,409,428
$244.67
5.4%
$310.22
94
6.2%
(1) Completed transaction data is based on actual arms-length sales transactions and levels are dependent on the mix of what happened to sell in the period. (2) Market price trends data is based on the estimated price movement of all properties in the market, informed by actual transactions that have occurred.
Copyrighted report licensed to COMPASS - 1028085
2/22/2021 Page 36
Sale Trends San Francisco Retail OTHER SALES Completed Transactions (1)
Market Pricing Trends (2)
Year
Deals
Volume
Turnover
Avg Price
Avg Price/SF
Avg Cap Rate
Price/SF
Price Index
Cap Rate
2025
-
-
-
-
-
-
$965.64
235
4.2%
2024
-
-
-
-
-
-
$949.76
231
4.2%
2023
-
-
-
-
-
-
$922.07
225
4.2%
2022
-
-
-
-
-
-
$872.47
213
4.3%
2021
-
-
-
-
-
-
$798.31
194
4.4%
YTD
-
-
-
-
-
-
$799.16
195
4.5%
2020
-
-
-
-
-
-
$802.68
196
4.5%
2019
-
-
-
-
-
-
$833.83
203
4.4%
2018
-
-
-
-
-
-
$810.32
197
4.4%
2017
-
-
-
-
-
-
$774.51
189
4.4%
2016
-
-
-
-
-
-
$758.40
185
4.4%
2015
-
-
-
-
-
-
$775.80
189
4.3%
2014
-
-
-
-
-
-
$669.83
163
4.7%
2013
-
-
-
-
-
-
$562.88
137
5.1%
2012
1
$0.00
29.6%
-
-
-
$530.62
129
5.2%
2011
-
-
-
-
-
-
$418.89
102
5.9%
2010
1
$19M
16.5%
$19,000,000
$105.56
-
$385.35
94
6.2%
(1) Completed transaction data is based on actual arms-length sales transactions and levels are dependent on the mix of what happened to sell in the period. (2) Market price trends data is based on the estimated price movement of all properties in the market, informed by actual transactions that have occurred.
Copyrighted report licensed to COMPASS - 1028085
2/22/2021 Page 37