Central Times September 2019

Page 1

 � � �

Tuesday, Sept. 24, 2019 Volume 31 - Issue 1

CENTRAL TIMES

Revised dress code permits wearing hats

Also in this issue... Special education staff shortages Page 2

Cameron Rozek @crozekCT

As of the beginning of this school year, students are now permitted to wear hats, hoods, and other non religious head coverings that had previously been prohibited. The ‘no hats’ rule is a long standing policy in many schools and dates back several decades. For years it was seen as disrespectful for anyone to wear a hat indoors in the United States. However, this unwritten rule has long since dissolved. Most schools still implement the no hat policy because of its relation to gangs. In the 1980’s and 90’s, gangs ran rampant, using hats as a symbol. Schools were quick to outlaw hats, and the rule stuck, even after the gang violence died down, especially in the Naperville area. This change to the dress code was first suggested two years ago. Dean Kathy Howat tells Central Times that the hat committee, a group of teachers and staff, examined dress codes from nearby school districts and state guidelines and compared them to Naperville Central’s. Howat explains that two major differences were found between the Central dress code and those of the state and other schools. The first and more minor change was outlawing hate speech as well as pornography. The second, larger difference that the committee noticed was that other schools were beginning to allow hats. “If you look at Hinsdale’s or if you look at Stevenson High School, Evanston High School, they have started doing away with the rule on hats,� Howat said. When communicating with Hinsdale Central, Naperville Central inquired about the consequences of changing the rule. When the new policy was put in place at Hinsdale

Break your Starbucks habit with these dining ideas Page 4 Art by Isabel Zhou

Central, the administration saw no rise in disrespect or behavioral issues. However, Howat says the determining factor was the blanket school dress code policy. The policy reads, “Students’ appearance, including dress and personal hygiene, must not disrupt the educational process, interfere with the maintenance of a positive teaching or learning climate, or compromise reasonable standards of health, safety, and decency.� Hats are usually worn by students as a dress preference, and allow students to express and enjoy themselves. “We shouldn’t be putting a rule in [the dress code] that is arbitrary, or keep one there just because it’s always been there.� Howat explains, “The board policy is disruption to the learning environment, and how does a hat in and of itself, create a disruption?� Most teachers have accepted the change. None of the teachers on the committee were cited to have an issue with accepting hats into the dress code.

Annette Hennessy is an English teacher here at Central who has taught for several decades and has seen dress code changes in the past, as well live with the old hat policy for most of her teaching career. When asked how she felt regarding this change, she offered her take on the topic. “I think that in a school situation, or in any type of formal situation, taking your hat off is a sign of respect. But I want students to be able to express themselves creatively by how they dress.� Henessy said, noting formal situations should still be treated with respect in the form of removing a hat. As for students, not one of the twenty randomly questioned in the hallway had any objection to the rule, and several welcomed the change, happy that hats could be incorporated into their wardrobe. Students can now rest assured that a simple hat or hood, whether a fashion statement, or simple a coverup for a bad hair day, is perfectly acceptable.

Pritzker signs law clarifying schools’ responsibilies when questioning students suspected of criminal activity William Tong Prompted in part by a renewed focus on suicide prevention among adolescents following the 2017 death of a Naperville North student, Gov. J.B. Pritzker signed into law a bill clarifying the expectations on school officials when questioning a student about potential criminal behavior. The new law took effect immediately upon the Aug. 23 signing. House Bill 2627, introduced by Illinois Rep. Stephanie Kifowit of Aurora, states that prior to questioning a student in such a situation, school officials must “ensure that notification or attempted notification to the student’s parent or guardian is made,� and “make reasonable efforts to ensure that the student’s parent or guardian is present during questioning.� The law also requires schools to “make reasonable efforts to ensure that school personnel, including, but not limited to, a school social worker, a school psychologist, a school nurse, a school guidance counselor, or any other mental health professional, are present during the questioning� in the case that a parent is not present or is unable to attend. In response to the law, Sinikka Mondini, District 203’s executive director of communications, issued the following statement on behalf of the district: “Naperville 203 will continue to work with our local law enforcement agencies to ensure compliance with the law. At Naperville 203, the student-staff relationships are of paramount importance and we remain confident in our staff who serve with our students’ best interests at heart.�

The Central Times contacted several district per- of students. sonnel, including deans at Naperville Central and “I don’t know if it would prevent suicides, but members of the Board of Education, all of whom I think it will definitely protect the kids from declined to comment for this story. intimidation,� said Melissa Pytlak, a parent of a NaOthers, however, are speaking out. perville Central student. “That, too, would depend “We are very pleased with the passage of the new on each individual child’s emotional state and how law,� Maureen Walgren said. “We hope it will help they process things.� prevent a tragedy like this from happening again. “Rais[ing] awareness of the constitutional rights No family should have to experience what we of minors in the school setting and provid[ing] edhave.� ucation on how disciplinary practices Walgren “We are very pleased with the passage in schools can better support the emoof the new law. We hope it will help and her tional well-being of students� is a key prevent a tragedy like this from hap- component of Corey’s Goal’s mission. husband, Doug, es- pening again. No family should have The law appears to address both of tablished the to experience what we have� these issues. organization “We believe that Corey’s story has Corey’s Goal - Maureen Walgren, mother of revealed some shortfalls in the way in response Corey Walgren, a Naperville North stu- schools handle serious disciplinary dent who died by suicide in 2017 to the matters, and we will continue to try to events surrounding the death of their 16-year-old make change to fix those shortfalls,� Walgren said. son, Corey, who took his life after walking out of In January, a federal judge dismissed a lawsuit Naperville North High School following an intense filed by the Walgren family against District 203 investigation by school administrators into alleged and the City of Naperville for their responsibility questionable material on his cell phone. in their son’s death. After appealing the decision, Though the new law formalizes procedures for both the District 203 Board of Education and the school officials seeking to detain and question stucity recently agreed to a $125,000 settlement apiece dents on school grounds, not everyone believes it in exchange for the family dropping the suit. As rewill actually mitigate the larger problem of suicide. ported by the Chicago Tribune, neither the school “The law itself is not going to prevent suicides,� district or the city admits to any wrongdoing or Naperville Central sophomore Matt Blessing said. liability in their decisions to approve the financial “If you’re going to [complete] suicide, you’re obvisettlements. ously facing something else.� National Suicide Prevention Hotline: Perhaps more broadly, however, many see the 1-800-273-8255 law as a positive first step in protecting the rights

...and on our website: Meet Central’s new staff members with our Q&A profiles on centraltimes.org or on Twitter @centraltimes #teacherfeature

Students: Know your rights Mary Jane Deer @mjdeerCT

House Bill 2627 has expanded the rights of students during criminal questioning on school grounds, but to an extent. The student rights under this law are confined to school hours and property and when being questioned by a law enforcement official, school resource office, or security guard. A “reasonable effort� to contact the questioned student’s parents or legal guardians must be made and recorded, and officers should make a “reasonable effort� to have a parent, legal guardian, or school staff member who is a mental health professional present during questioning. If the questioning is for criminal action, the student rights are not protected under the law if it is necessary to protect bodily harm or injury to the student or any other person, stop the destruction of evidence, apprehend a fleeing suspect, or address an emergency or dangerous situation. When being questioned by a dean, school resource officer, or any other staff member, students are advised to request adult representation by either a parent, counselor, nurse, or trusted adult and have that attempted request recorded. If the questioning is not regarding criminal charges or investigation, the new law does not apply.

 Â? Â? Â? Â?  Â? ­ € €


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.