Architecture Portfolio
CYNTHIA LAI
Graduate of Architecture
Master of Architecture
The University of Melbourne
cynthia.lai.915@gmail.com
Selected works 2016-2019
01
03
02
THE CROSSOVER
TAKE A BRICK
HYPER-CERAMICS TESSELLATION
Jun, 2018 Melbourne CBD Academic work
Nov, 2018 Melbourne School of Design Academic work
Nov, 2019 Melbourne School of Design Academic work
Roof framing & covering 1
Versiclad 75mm panels. 1.5˚ fall ba�ens.
2
Exposed lamina to precast colum 45x90 MGP12 and @1200 cts J24090 HY jois screwed at eac
3 4 5
380x100 PFC.
Parapet framing 6 7 8
9 10
00
Girts C150 12 @ Girts C150 12 @
Internal
7.
et
Colourbond par cladding External wall cla Kingspan AirCe 150mm overlap cladding
13
1
ap
11 12 12a 13
Par
6
Plasterboard ce Formply pelmet Formply pelmet Suspended ceil
82
7 3
5.
50
4
Windows & Spandrel
ve
l 13
11
f le R
oo
14 15 16 17
8
2
5
9
19
3600
Veranda framing & roofi
10
20 21 30
l 13
1.
10
22 23 24 25 26
1
1/
F
le
ve
32 14
9
0.
16
l 13
1000
le
ce
15
G
31
29
22
25
30
300 thk. hollow connected by j 80 thk. screed carpet
31
700W x 600D couplers. 30x3 250Wx700DCo rod ties, 6-N20 readbars locatin
3000
25
36
12a
32
17
14
24
32
40
Soi G l le/F le ve ve l 12l 12 7. 7. 77 90
19
Footing & Ground Slab
26
600
33 25
300
37
34
41
29
35 36
27
37
39 28
42
450 wide conc 300 thk. concre insulation on th
39 40 41 42 43
450Ø bored pie Re-entrant reinf Trench grate dr External concre 600Ø bored pie
Foundation
43
44 45 46 47
44
2
05 150 LANGRIDGE ST Jun, 2019 Collingwood, Melbourne Academic work
B
C
D
E
F
G H
45
1
47
3
5
47
D
4
47 6
46
Subject
Project Name
Student Name
Tutor Name
Scale
Construction Design ABPL30041_S01_2017
Assignment 2_Axonometric Drawing Western BACE by Six Degrees Architects
Cheuk Yi Lai
Carrie Lim
1:20 @ A0
07
CONSTRUCTION ANALYSIS Jun, 2017 Melton South, Victoria Academic work
150 concrete sl cover. Sits abov compressible c In slab hydronic 20 cover 15mm setdown 450Ø bored pie slab. SL92 x 24 2m x 2m pad fo @250 cts. max Connected to p
38 38
A
90x390x190 ex 70mm cavity w cavity below flo 190x190x390 C and vertically @
Precast concrete (beam
35
34
27 28
2
20 21
33
Purlin C150 15 Ampelite ‘Webg reinforcement,1 Beam 610 UB 1 45 square hard 400W x 200D B 200x75 PFC ho 150UC 30.0 H galvanised hold
Masonry wall
13
ve
iling
Vertical sunsha SHS frame Horizontal suns each end. Supp
18
12
/F
Viridian double 150x60mm alum Spandrel framin Spandrel: Virid the inside layer
Sunscreen 18
0.15-0.6m belo Extremely or hig Soil refusal poin Angle of respon
04 GROUND-MADE
2016 - 2019
Nov, 2019 Arada, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia Design Thesis
08
HIGH-RISE TOWER
Feb, 2016 Hong Kong Internship at Meta4 Design Forum
FACADE DESIGN Jan, 2017 China Internship at Arup
Jun, 2019 Melbourne CBD Academic work 3
Selected works
06
09
HERITAGE CENTRE
NUMBER OF BRICKS: 502 WEIGHT: 200 KG PRINTING TIME: 2 WEEKS TIME TAKEN TO ASSEMBLE: 3 DAYS
3
D
AY
S
SHRINKAGE: ~88%
T EN PR O > J TI EC > M T L E M > AB AN C O O U AG ST R EM S
8
W
EE
KS
3
W
EE
KS
Form
> GEOMETRY & QUANTITY OF BRICKS
> CO J L > OI OU G NT R > EO TO M LE ET R RY EN C E
KS
> AESTHETICS
>
EE W
C RI L P TO AY TIN O MI G L X C IN AL G IB R AT IO
2
M 046
> EFFICIENCY
M
>
>
SC
N
3
> STRUCTURAL STRENGTH
>
181
M 6M
MATERIAL: CLAY
> SELF-SUPPORTING
AVERAGE WEIGHT: 400 G
> LIGHTWEIGHT
AVERAGE PRINT TIME: 1 MIN
> LIGHT AND SHADOW EFFECTS
SHRINKAGE: ~88%
23 57 M M
( )
6 AXIS ROBOT ARM
OUTER LAYER PRINTING PATH INNER LAYER
108
CLAY TUBE
MM
26
0
M
M
EXTRUDER
90 M M
PRINT BED
01
HYPER-CERAMICS TESSELLATION Nov, 2019 Melbourne School of Design Robotic fabrication Rhino / Grasshopper / robotic arm Prototyping / fabrication / project management / team collaboration Academic (Master of Architecture)
Hyper-Ceramic Tessellation is a structural innovation that explores the potentials of parametric tools and automated fabrication processes. Its innovation lies in its three-dimensional interlocking brick system, that achieves tessellation on a hyperbolic surface. As a result, the traditional 'clay brick' was re-imagined through a mass customisation process. The resulting hollowed, undulating brick represents new opportunities for designers to consider materials and structural systems through the lens of new technology. A team of five students were involved in the design, prototyping, production and construction of the self-supporting clay structure. The final hyperbolic form and brick geometry were derived through a profound prototyping process; numerous considerations, including tolerances, shrinkages and ease of production, were accounted for. Meanwhile, a detailed project planning was developed since the early stages to ensure on-time delivery of the final piece. 5
CURVED SURFACE
APPLY LATTICE PATTERN
FOUR PANELS
DIVIDE INTO 9 PIECES
APPLY LATTICE PATTERN WITH INTERLOCKING SIDES
EACH BRICK LAID FLAT
BRICKS WITH CURVED INTERLOCKING SIDES
BRICK
DUPLICATE BRICK
JOIN BRICKS TO FORM AN ARCH
FLIP TOP BRICK
MULTIPLY BRICKS TO FORM AN ARCH
ONE SECTION
BASE SURFACE
MORPH BRICK PATTERN ONTO SURFACE
7
Close-up of the final design
Production
Form tests
Brick stacking tests
Colour tests
Joint tests
Alternative vault type 1
Variation 1
Chosen: Toast clay
Bolts + rubber washers
Alternative vault type 2
Variation 2
Dark Stoneware
Bolts + felt washers
Chosen: Alternative vault type 3
Variation 3
Stoneware 33
Mortar
Alternative vault type 3a
Chosen: Variation 4
Other colours
Tinted mortar
Alternative vault type 3b
Variation 5
Miscellaneous colours
Chosen: Sikaflex
9
Production
Bricks ready to be assembled
Production tracking sheet example STAGES
PRINTING BRICKS A01 A02 A03 A04 A05 A06 A07 A08 A09 A10 A11 A12 A13 A14 A15 A16 A17 A18 A19 A20 A21 A22 A23 A24 A25 A26 A27 A28
STATUS R EDO C OM P L E T E C OM P L E T E C OM P L E T E C OM P L E T E C OM P L E T E C OM P L E T E C OM P L E T E C OM P L E T E C OM P L E T E C OM P L E T E C OM P L E T E C OM P L E T E C OM P L E T E C OM P L E T E C OM P L E T E C OM P L E T E C OM P L E T E C OM P L E T E C OM P L E T E C OM P L E T E C OM P L E T E C OM P L E T E C OM P L E T E C OM P L E T E C OM P L E T E C OM P L E T E C OM P L E T E
SCHEDULED
DATE
2‐NOV
COMPLETED 2 ‐ NOV 2 ‐ NOV 2 ‐ NOV 2 ‐ NOV 2 ‐ NOV 2 ‐ NOV 2 ‐ NOV 2 ‐ NOV 2 ‐ NOV 2 ‐ NOV 2 ‐ NOV 2 ‐ NOV 2 ‐ NOV 2 ‐ NOV 2 ‐ NOV 2 ‐ NOV 2 ‐ NOV 2 ‐ NOV 2 ‐ NOV 2 ‐ NOV 2 ‐ NOV 2 ‐ NOV 2 ‐ NOV 2 ‐ NOV 3 ‐ NOV 3 ‐ NOV 3 ‐ NOV 3 ‐ NOV
DRYING
DRY DRY DRY DRY WET WET WET WET WET WET WET WET WET WET WET WET WET WET WET WET WET WET WET WET WET WET WET WET
BOARD NUMBER
DATE
STATUS
6 ‐ N OV 6 ‐ N OV 6 ‐ N OV 6 ‐ N OV
RESPONSIBLE MEMBER
STATUS I N COM P LE T E I N COM P LE T E I N COM P LE T E I N COM P LE T E I N COM P LE T E I N COM P LE T E I N COM P LE T E I N COM P LE T E I N COM P LE T E I N COM P LE T E I N COM P LE T E I N COM P LE T E I N COM P LE T E I N COM P LE T E I N COM P LE T E I N COM P LE T E I N COM P LE T E I N COM P LE T E I N COM P LE T E I N COM P LE T E I N COM P LE T E I N COM P LE T E I N COM P LE T E I N COM P LE T E I N COM P LE T E I N COM P LE T E I N COM P LE T E I N COM P LE T E
1 0 ‐ N OV BOARD 15
BOARD 16
6 ‐ N OV
STAGES
FIRED
REDO DATE
N A TH A N BOARD 17
BOARD 18
BOARD 19
SCH E D U LE D
DATE C OM P LE TE D
12 ‐ N OV
RETURNED SCH E D U LE D
STATUS I N COM P LE TE I N COM P LE TE I N COM P LE TE I N COM P LE TE I N COM P LE TE I N COM P LE TE I N COM P LE TE I N COM P LE TE I N COM P LE TE I N COM P LE TE I N COM P LE TE I N COM P LE TE I N COM P LE TE I N COM P LE TE I N COM P LE TE I N COM P LE TE I N COM P LE TE I N COM P LE TE I N COM P LE TE I N COM P LE TE I N COM P LE TE I N COM P LE TE I N COM P LE TE I N COM P LE TE I N COM P LE TE I N COM P LE TE I N COM P LE TE I N COM P LE TE
BATCH NUMBER
DATE C OM P LE TE D
12 ‐ N OV
REDO DATE
1
Production time estimates Resources Hours/ day Days/ week Shift duration (hr) No. of shift pp Robot Available Firing time (weeks)
Remarks 9:30 8 17:30 MonFri,Sat 2 half day 4 4 1 2
Time commitment
Time commitment per member (hr)
Time commitment pp per week (hr) Expected production time (weeks) No. of members Total time available (hr)
170.0
Time estimation (Printing)
J
Duration No. of (min) members Batch Mix clay 45 2 Clean tube 1 1 Fill tube 10 2 Set up robot 30 2 Load tube 2 2 Start print 0.5 1 Print 1 Take print 0.5 1 Unload tube 2 1 Clean up robot 30 2
I J K
Filming Cleaning Allowance
Task A B C D E F G H I
1 1
14.2 4 5 320.0
Total Structure
Per Brick
Time estimation (Firing)
Duration (min)
Unit 35 bricks 7 bricks 7 bricks 7 bricks
Total (min) 10% of total 5% of total 15% of total Total (min) Total (hr) Total (day) Total (weeks) Firing batch size
Remarks
No. of batches Firing time (weeks)
1 tube = 7 bricks 1 bucket (20kg) = 5 tubes 1 bucket (20kg) = 35 bricks
Total time estimation
Total (weeks)
11
Scene A
Scene B
Scene C
752.1 195.0 1950.0 139.3 390.0 97.5 975.0 97.5 0.0
417.9 46.4 464.3 67.5 92.9 162.5 812.5 162.5 0.0
1168.7 909.0 9090.0 491.0 1818.0 454.5 2272.5 0.0 0.0
139.3
67.5
491.0
4735.7 473.6 236.8 710.4
2293.9 229.4 114.7 344.1
16694.8 1669.5 834.7 2504.2
6156.4
2982.0
21703.2
102.6
49.7
361.7
12.8
6.2
45.2
6.4
3.1
22.6
50
100
100
4
3
9
5
4
10
7
4
22
METHOD
RATIO
CONTROL PARAMETERS > ROBOT SPEED > AIR PRESSURE > LAYER HEIGHT > OBJECT GEOMETRY
BRICK DUST
> PRINTING MATERIAL BRIC K DUST STARCH
EXTRUDER
WATER CORN STARCH
VINEGAR
WATER
6 AXIS ROBOT ARM
VINEGAR
GLYCEROL
GLYCEROL ADDITIVES AIR PIPE CONNECTED TO PRESSURE VALVE
RUBBER (GLUED TO CLAMPS)
HEATED & STIRRED
3D PRINTED CLAMP (PLA)
ROBOT ARM MOUNT 3D PRINTED CLAMP SYRINGE
MECHANICAL EXTRUDER ROBOTS ARM MOUNT
PLUNGER HEAD
AIR PRESSURE EXTRUDER GT2 TIMING BELT
TIMBER PIECE
PRINT OBJECT
EPOXY GT2 PULLEY - 16 TEETH, 5 MM BORE
NON-STICK SURFACE STEPPER MOTOR
10ML LUER LOCK SYRINGE
02
TAKE A BRICK Nov, 2018 Melbourne School of Design Material research Rhino / Grasshopper / Autodesk Recap / robots arm Material research / advanced technology / experimental architecture Academic (Master of Architecture)
Take a Brick is a semester-long research into a novel 3d-printing material called bioplastic-brick dust composite. The project explores how robotic 3d-printing could promote new ways of building construction, ones that are more sustainable and efficient. Part 1 of the research involved deriving the right formula of ingredients that balances strength and workability. Part 2 involved the design of walls, columns and vaults prototypes through profound experimentation. The process also involved the design of 3d-printing tools and robot calibration. An infill pattern was proposed to overcome shrinkage of the material and strengthen the print object. Not only does the project contribute to the exploration of new materials and technology, but it also presents a design opportunity to celebrate tactility and morphological freedom. 13
Speculation on the material’s application
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
LE
NE
ELASTICITY
IT Y
ITT
ADH
F L U ID
BR
E S IV
ENE
SS
* starch : water ratio
SM
SS
EL
L
TRANSPARENCY
DRYING TIME
WORKABILITY
STARCH : WATER RATIO
STARCH : WATER RATIO
TIC
ITY
WE
DNE
IB IL IT
HT
HAR SS
FLEX
IG
STRENGTH
AS
Y
EL
[5] BIOPLASTIC 1 : 4
[7] BIOPLASTIC 1 : 1
[9] BIOPLASTIC + CLAY (20%)
[15] BIOPLASTIC + SAWDUST (20%)
[6] BIOPLASTIC 1 : 2
[8] BIOPLASTIC 2 : 1
[10] BIOPLASTIC + CLAY (40%)
[16] BIOPLASTIC + SAWDUST (40%)
15
BIOPLASTIC : CLAY RATIO
Final prototype: wall
Final prototype: column
Final prototype: vault
DE
FR
FR
PT
EQ
EQ
A HV
UE
UE
NC
RIA
TIO
N1 DE
A YV
RIA
TIO
NC
RIA
TIO
RIA
EQ
TIO
UE
NC
Y
R VA
EQ
DE
UE
IAT
ION
NC
A YV
RIA
TIO
PT
A HV
RIA
TIO
2
FR
N4
FR
N2
The tallest print
N1
FR
A YV
PT
A HV
EQ
UE
NC
Y
R VA
N5
FR
EQ
UE
NC
A YV
N3
IAT
RIA
ION
TIO
3
N6
Typology: wall
The tallest print
N GE
N GE
ER
ER
AT
AT
ION
1
ION
5
N GE
T RA NE 0 GE : 0.5 1
ER
AT
N GE
ION
1
ION
ER
2
AT
N GE
ION
T RA NE 0 GE : 0.6 1
6 N GE
ION
2
ER
ER
AT
AT
ION
ION
3 N GE
ER
AT
7
T RA NE 5 GE : 0.6 1
N GE
ION
3
ER
ION
AT
4
ION
8
Typology: column
T RA NE 6 GE : 0.6 1
ION
4
The tallest print
TIO RA NE 7 GE : 0.6 1
TIO RA NE 5 GE : 0.7 1
N9
N5
TIO RA NE 8 GE : 0.6 1
TIO RA NE 0 GE : 0.8 1
N6
N1
0
TIO RA NE 9 GE : 0.6 1
TIO RA NE 5 GE : 0.8 1
N7
N1
TIO RA NE 0 GE : 0.7 1
1
N8
T RA NE 0 GE : 0.9 1
17
ION
12
Typology: vault
Speculation on the material’s application
Base
Middle
Top Printing simulation: wall
Base
Middle
Top Printing simulation: column
Base
Middle
Top Printing simulation: vault
Experiments show that one limitation of the bioplastic-brick dust composite is the height limit to the print object (before it collapses). The maximum achievable number of layers is 30 (with 1.6 mm layer thickness). The solution to this problem is to print each object in three parts, which would be assembled after the curing process.
Printing path generation and RAPID code generation script in Grasshopper 19
Perspective view to the atrium
03
THE CROSSOVER Jun, 2018 Melbourne CBD Commercial (shopping mall) Rhino / Grasshopper / AutoCAD / Vray Form-finding / generative design / parametric tool Academic (Master of Architecture)
The Crossover proposes a new shopping mall on Swanston Street that improves connectivity in the Melbourne CBD, while introducing a new retail typology: ‘retail-tainment’. Located between two major shopping malls, the new development takes advantage of the hectic flow of people by providing physical and visual linkages between localities. Meanwhile, a parametric design process resulted in a stimulating atrium space and various shop sizes, which encourage the crossover of culture, entertainment and retail. A collection of existing shops in Melbourne were used to form the building through a Grasshopper script: they were randomly assembled, rotated and scaled and finally form a single block. Shop fronts collected in the city were applied to the building façades/ shop fronts as a response to the cultural context. 21
SHOP SHOP
MELBOURNE CENTRAL
S Melbourne Central Swanston St
QV
Drewery Ln
CAR PARK
QV
MELBOURNE CENTRAL
SWANSTON ST
A DREWERY LN
A
QV
Ground floor plan
Roof skylight
Facade panels
Melbourne Central
QV
Circulation
Drewery Ln
Swanston St
QV
Floor plates
QV
Shop windows QV
SWANSTON ST
QV
MELBOURNE CENTRAL A DREWERY LN
A
Shop volumes
SWANSTON ST
A
SWANSTON ST
SHOP
QV QV
Section A-A
The central atrium, which connects all levels from the underground level to the sixth level, is the heart of the building. Streams of visitors from Swanston Street, QV and Melbourne Central are directed to the atrium. It is where all activities are displayed and celebrated, giving visitors a sensational experience of a vertical, mega crossing within a vibrant and busy city.
0
5
10
20
30
40
Typical floor plan 23
0
5
10
20
30
40
View from Swanston Street
Kit-of-parts: building form
Kit-of-parts: shop fronts
Facade
4. Divide points into 4 sets 3. Cull points in atrium
Populate 3D
Points in Brep
Random Reduce
Cull
Set Difference
1. Building Boundary
XY Plane Slider
Random Reduce
Box 2. Atrium boundary
Deconstruct Brep
5. Component input
Surface
Pick Item
Offset
Slider
Slider
Box Points set 1
Points set 2
Set Difference Random Reduce
Set Difference
Points set 3
Points set 4
6. Place components to points sets
Component 1
Centre
Orient
Component 2
Centre
Orient
Component 3
Centre
Orient
Component 4
Centre
Orient
7. Rotation
8. Scale
Random Mesh
Simplify
Flatten
Centre
Rotate x-axis
Random Rotate y-axis
Rotate z-axis
Scale
Mesh Join
Form finding process in Grasshopper
Total floor area + volume & view of atrium
Iterations & selection
View from Swanston Street
25%
Severely Food Insecure 23.3%
20%
Unemployment Rate
Urban Food Insecurity
15%
10%
Inflation Rate
5%
Food Inflation Rate 0%
2014
Food Secure 25.1%
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
Moderately Food Insecure 31.1%
Mild Food Insecure 20.5%
04
GROUND-MADE
Nov, 2019 Arada, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia Residential (social housing) Rhino / AutoCAD / Vray Socio-economic development / urban development Design thesis (Master of Architecture) This thesis proposes the integration of a food production system into the social housing development in inner Addis Ababa as a strategy to alleviate urban food insecurity. Despite rapid economic growth and urbanisation in recent years, inflation, unemployment and relocations continue to threaten the food security of the urban poor in Addis Ababa. The resulting architecture of “groundedness” has been derived from extensive research into the urban food system, local housing development and food culture. It is expressed through the building form, courtyard typology, materiality, axes, façades and circulation. A food secure network within the housing complex is supported by a continuous flow from the agriculture land (production) to the courtyards (processing) and household units (consumption) or shops (surplus). In short, a new social housing typology has been proposed that addresses the need for food security and modernisation while responding to the rich historical and environmental context of this rapidly growing city. 27
Ba nty ke tu Riv er
Informal housing
Cleared area for new housing developments
Ground Floor Plan 1:200 0 1
5
10m
First Floor Plan 1:200 0 1
5
10m
Second Floor Plan 1:200 0 1
5
10m
Site plan
Site Plan 1:1000 0
50
100
150
Street Elevation 1:200 0 1
Site
5
10m
Lane Elevation 1:200 0 1
5
10m
Section A-A 1:100 0
1
2
5m
The site in Arada sub-city has a high population density and large areas of slums. Previously a slum area, the site is now a vacant lot for future housing development. Its neighbouring slums will also be cleared for new housing and mixed-use corridor developments. The site also suffers from serious environmental degradation, flooding and loss in urban green space. Section B-B 1:200 0 1
5
10m
Detail Section C-C 1:20 0
0.5
1
2m
1
2m
Detail Section D-D 1:20
High density
0
Low density
0 1 2
5 km
0.5
200m
4
4
4
5 1
4
4
4
1
2 2
1 1
4
3
5 4 6 4
A
A
5 1
4
3
4
4
1 2 2
1 1
4
5 4
4
4
Ground Floor Plan 1:200 0 1
5
10m
First Floor Plan 1:200 0 1
5 Plan 1:200 Ground Floor 0 1
5
10m
Ground floor plan
10m
Second Floor Plan 1:200 First Floor Plan 1:200
Food consumption Road
0 1
Food processing
Housing /Shop
55
Food production 0 1
10m 10m
Second Floor Plan 1:200 Site Plan 1:1000
Courtyard
Housing
Barn/ Storage
Farm5
0 1
0
1. Shop 2. Courtyard
10m
50
Site Plan 1:1000 0
Legend
3. Barn/ storage 4. Housing units
100
5. Shop100 + housing units
50
6. Agriculture land Street Elevation 1:200
Street Elevation 1:200
4
0 1
5
4
0 1
4
Lane Elevation 1:200
4
0 1
0 1
5 4
2
10m
5
10m
Lane Elevation 1:200 10m
5
10m
Section A-A 1:100 0
3
5
1
2
5m
Section B-B 1:200 0 1
5
6 Section A-A 1:100
10m
Detail Section C-C 1:20
0
10
2
0.5
1
5m
2m
Detail Section D-D 1:20
Section0 B-B 1:200 0.5
29
0 1
5
Detail Section C-C 1:20
1
2m
10m
Section A-A
150
Design considerations
Compound formation
Boundary Rainwater Collection
Corner Block
Sun Path Terrace
Food processing courtyard
Street Activation
Focal Point
Activities
Circulation
Landscape
Floods
Farm land and the barn
Interconnectivity
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
Ground Floor Plan 1:200 0 1
5
Ground Floor Plan 1:200
First floor plan
10m
0 1
First Floor Plan 1:200 0 1
5
10m
5
5
0 1 Ground Floor Plan5 1:200
0 1
10m
5
0 1
50
100
150
0
200m
5
1 2
1
1
1
1
0.5
0.5
2. Courtyard 3. Barn/ storage 5. Shop100 + housing units 6. Agriculture land
1
1
10m
10m 10m
50 1
100
Section A-A 1:100 0
1
1
2
5m
Street Elevation 1:200
10m
0 1
0 1 1
2m
5
5
Detail Section C-C 1:20 0
0.5
10m
10m 1
Lane Elevation 1:200
Detail Section D-D 1:20 0
1. Shop
Section B-B 1:200
Detail Section C-C 1:20 0
5
0
1
5m
5
Lane Elevation 1:200 0 1
Section B-B 1:200 0 1
5
5
Site Plan 1:1000
10m
Section A-A 1:100 1
Legend
4. Housing units 10m
0 1
0 1
Lane Elevation 1:200
0
10m
50
5
10m
5
Second floor plan
Second Floor Plan 1:200 Street Elevation 1:200
Street Elevation 1:200
1
10m
Site Plan 1:1000
0 1
1
5
First Floor Plan 1:200
0
0 1
10m
Second Floor Plan 1:200
Site Plan 1:1000
0 1
10m
First Floor Plan 1:200
Second Floor Plan 1:200 0 1
4
Detail Section D-D 1:20
1
0 1
2m
0
5
0.5
10m 1
2m
Street elevation 2m
Section A-A 1:100 0 1 2 5m Ground Floor Plan 1:200 Section B-B 1:200 0 1 5 0 1 5
10m 10m
First Floor Plan 1:200 Detail Section C-C 1:20 0 1 0
5 0.5
110m
2m
1 10m
2m
50
100
Second Floor Plan 1:200 Detail Section D-D 1:20 0 0 1
0.5 5
Site Plan 1:1000
3
0
3
Street Elevation 1:200 0 1
5
10m
Lane Elevation 1:200
31
0 1
5
10m
Lane elevation
150
Physical model 1:200
Physical model 1:1000
Physical model 1:200
Physical model 1:1000
33
>80 60-79 YEARS 0-19 YEARS YEARS 40-59 YEARS
MEDIAN AGE
PART-TIME
20-39 YEARS
REGISTERED MARRIAGE
OTHER
EMPLOYMENT
NOT MARRIED FULL TIME
SOCIAL MATIAL STATUS
ONE PARENT FAMILY
OTHER
FAMILY COMPOSITION
DE FACTO MARRIAGE COUPLE WITH CHILDREN
OTHER
PARENT’S EMPLOYMENT
COUPLE WITHOUT CHILDREN
BOTH FULL TIME
ONE FULL TIME
Collingwood demographics
Site analysis
LEGEND GREENERY COMMUNAL USE COMMERCIAL USE PUBLIC ACCESS PRIVATE ACCESS
Ground floor plan
05
150 LANGRIDGE ST
Residential (apartment) Jun, 2019 Collingwood, Melbourne Rhino / SketchUp / AutoCAD Housing affordability / family living / communal living Academic (Master of Architecture) 150 Langridge Street is a built-to-rent co-living apartment in Collingwood, Melbourne. It provides long-term rental accommodation for families who cannot afford home-ownership, but still want to live in a place that they call ‘home’. The design aims to deliver quality and community-oriented living spaces to support those families. This co-living arrangement is founded upon the hierarchy of community: small as one family unit and large as the entire neighbourhood. Careful consideration is given to interfaces between different hierarchical spaces, with the aim to give users a high level of control over privacy against the backdrop of co-living. The living room, dining room and kitchen are shared between two or three families, while the bathroom remains exclusive to each family. Abundant communal spaces are provided, along with a childcare centre and grocery store that further support family-living and generate additional revenue. 35
First floor plan
LEGEND
GREENER
COMMUNA
COMMERC
PUBLIC A
PRIVATE A
LEGEND GREENERY COMMUNAL USE COMMERCIAL USE LEGEND PUBLIC ACCESS GREENERY PRIVATE ACCESS COMMUNAL USE COMMERCIAL USE PUBLIC ACCESS PRIVATE ACCESS
Typical floor plan
Apartment cluster plan
Section B-B
The design is a five-storey timber building. Timber is chosen for its environmental benefits and the ‘warmth’ it adds to the interior spaces. The design consists of two residential wings, which are connected by a concrete core. The building height is a response to its low-rise surrounding. Its orientation to the north allows for better daylight access in each room.
In the centre sits a private courtyard that is visible from Cromwell St. It provides abundant opportunities for greenery and communal activities. All levels are connected by a semi-outdoor vertical staircase. It is more than a means of circulation; it provides pocket spaces for kids and friends to hang out and enjoy the courtyard view.
Section A-A
On Langridge St., The existing faรงade is preserved along with the history of the site. Overall, the faรงade design aims to showcase the timber structure within, with slight variations depending on the orientation.
39
Physical model 1:200
Physical model 1:200
Physical model 1:200
41
et
p ra
13
ve l f le R oo
1
2
8 7
82
6 3
5. 50
4
13 ve l f le 5. 50
82
R oo 13 ve l
7
8
2
3
f le
2
R oo
5
6
13 ve l 1
g
13
ilin
6 30
6
ve l
ce
13
1. 10
1/ F 13
f le
ve l
ve l le
/F
g
ilin
/F
3000
R oo fl
R oo
g
ilin
ce
ce
3
l1
ve
le
G
11
1000
50 ev el 13 5.
3
4
1/ F
5. 50
4 11
1000
82
82
3
le
.9
30
15
5
3000
So G il /F le le ve ve l1 l1 27 27 .7 .9 7 0
3000
3600
600
So G So G il /F il /F le le le le ve ve ve ve l1 l1 l1 l1 27 27 27 27 .7 .9 .7 .9 7 0 7 0
300
1. 10 13
600
ve l le 1/ F
9
5 36
/F
ce
36
34
13
G
12
27 28 16
10 15
20
0 .1 31
27
32 B
D
C
E
F
G H
1
13
2
38
39 42
Precast concrete (beam, column & slab) 43
2
G
14
600 300
5
14
E
F
E
F
3 1
6 4
44
G H
47
25
27
3000
So G il /F le le ve ve l1 l1 27 27 .7 .9 7 0 600
46
39
25
31Project Name
Tutor Name
Student Name
Assignment 2_Axonometric Drawing Western BACE by Six Degrees Architects
36
14
Student Name
Tutor Name
Cheuk Yi Lai
Carrie Lim
42
Subject
Project Name
Construction Design ABPL30041_S01_2017
Assignment 2_Axonometric Drawing Western BACE by Six Degrees Architects
43
Student Name
Tutor Name
Cheuk Yi Lai
Carrie Lim
40
19
44 B
D
C
E
F
22
37
38
46 Carrie Lim
Cheuk Yi Lai
32 Project Name 17 2_Axonometric Drawing Assignment 12a Western BACE by Six Degrees Architects
39 40 41 42 43
Parapet framing 6
7 8
Colourbond parapet cladding External wall claddin Kingspan AirCell 8m 150mm overlap and cladding
9 10
Girts C150 12 @600 Girts C150 12 @600
Viridian double glazed low-e glass unit with ‘ThermoTech’ insulation 14 Sunscreen 150x60mm aluminium frame, square beading, anodised finish. 15 16 framing 150 PFCperforated Hot-dip galvinised 18 Vertical sunshade. 3mm steel sheet supported by 40mm WindowsSpandrel & Spandrel 17 Spandrel: SHS frameViridian single glass panel; laminated glass with colour on the inside layer Viridian double glazed3mm low-eperforated glass unit with Horizontal sunshade. steel‘ThermoTech’ sheet. 50mminsulation downturn at 14 19 each end. Supported 30x10 steel flat 150x60mm aluminiumby frame, square beading, anodised finish. 15 16 Spandrel framing 150 PFC Hot-dip galvinised 17 Spandrel: Viridian single glass panel; laminated glass with colour on Sunscreen the inside layer Veranda Vertical framing & roofing 3mm perforated steel sheet supported by 40mm 18 sunshade. SHS frame 20 Purlin C150sunshade. 15 @ 100 3mm cts. max., 1 row bridging. Bolted to 50x50x5 EAat Horizontal perforated steel sheet. 50mm downturn 19 Sunscreen 21 Ampelite polyester sheeting with woven mat each end.‘Webglass SupportedGC’ by 30x10 steel flat reinforcement,1˚ towards box gu�er 18 Vertical sunshade. 3mm perforated steel sheet supported by 40mm 22 Beam 610 UB 101 Hot-dip galvanised SHS frame 23 45 square hardwood battens @ 90 cts. screw fixed to joist Horizontal sunshade. 3mm sheet. 50mm downturn at 19 400W x 200D Box gutter withperforated sump andsteel downpipe 24 Veranda each framing & Supported roofing end. by 30x10 steel flat 25 200x75 PFC hop-dip galvanised 26 150UC 30.0 Hot-dip galvinised. Anchored to slab by 4-M16 hot dip 20 Purlin C150hold 15 @ 100 bolt cts. on max., 1 rowplate bridging. 50x50x5 galvanised down 20 base over Bolted 20 dry to pack grout EA 21 Ampelite ‘Webglass GC’ polyester sheeting with woven mat ˚ towards box gu�er Verandareinforcement,1 framing & roofing 22 Beam 610 UB 101 Hot-dip galvanised 23 45 square @ 90 cts. bridging. screw fixed to joist 20 Purlin C150hardwood 15 @ 100battens cts. max., 1 row Bolted to 50x50x5 EA 400W 24 Masonry wall x 200D Box gutter with sump and downpipe 21 AmpelitePFC ‘Webglass polyester sheeting with woven mat 25 200x75 hop-dipGC’ galvanised reinforcement,1 ˚ towards box gu�er 26 150UC 30.0 exterior Hot-dip galvinised. Anchored to slabbond. by 4-M16 hot dip 27 90x390x190 concrete blockwork. Stretcher Beam 610 UB 101 Hot-dip galvanised 22 galvanised hold down bolt on 20 base20’ plate over R2.4 20 dryinsulation. pack groutGrout 70mm cavity with Foilboard ‘Ultra 20mm 28 23 45 square hardwood battens @ 90 cts. screw fixed to joist cavity 400W below x 200Dfloor Boxlevel gutter with sump and downpipe 24 29 190x190x390 Core filled concrete blockwork. Reinforced horizontally 25 200x75 PFC hop-dip galvanised and vertically @ 400 cts. Connected to slab with N12by strater bars 26 150UC 30.0 Hot-dip galvinised. Anchored to slab 4-M16 hot dip hold down bolt on 20 base plate over 20 dry pack grout Masonry galvanised wall
20
D
47 150 concrete slab-on-ground, 32 MPa concrete, SL92 btm & top 30 cover. Sits above 0.2 polythene membrane and 100 min. layer of 47 compressible cardboard void former In slab hydronic heating coils run across mesh reinforcement with min. 20 cover 15mm setdown for carpet. lap mesh 500 min. 450Ø bored piers, 47400 kPa, unreinforced, supports locally thickened 47 SL92 x 2400 reinforcement top of slab slab. 2m x 2m pad footing to support concrete precast column. N20 bars btm @250 cts. max. each way; N16 bars top @250 cts. max. each way. Connected to precast column by 8 N20 dowels 47 wide concrete strip footing 4-L12 top & btm, 50 kPa. Connect to 450 Scale 300 thk. concrete edge beam by N16 tie bars @ 600 cts. max. Rigid 1:20 insulation @ A0 on the outer side. Extends to rock layer with mass concrete
21
D
11 12 12a 13
Windows & Spandrel
27 90x390x190 exterior concrete blockwork. Stretcher bond. Precast concrete (beam, column & slab) 70mm cavity with Foilboard ‘Ultra 20’ 20mm R2.4 insulation. Grout 28 Masonry cavity wall below floor level 30 300 thk. hollowcore slab 50 kPa. Each panel of width 1196mm is 29 190x190x390 Core filled concrete blockwork. Reinforced horizontally connected by joint concrete 30MPa min.and sealed on the underside. and verticallyexterior @ 400 concrete cts. Connected to slab with N12 strater bars 27 90x390x190 blockwork. Stretcher bond. 80 thk. screed slab N12 @ 600 cts. project 600. 15mm set down for 70mm 28 carpet cavity with Foilboard ‘Ultra 20’ 20mm R2.4 insulation. Grout cavity below floor level 700W x 600D beam 50 kPa. Reinforced 4-RB2525-100 to readbar 31 29 190x190x390 Core filled concrete blockwork. Reinforced horizontally couplers. 30x3 Neoprene bearing strip between slab and beam Precast concrete (beam, column & slab) and vertically @ 400 cts. Connected to slab with N12 strater bars 32 250Wx700DColumn 50 kPa. N20 cage bars, 4-N20 bars vertical & R10 rod bars horizontal. Connected beamofbywidth 2 RB20 30 300 ties, thk.6-N20 hollowcore slab 50 kPa. Each to panel 1196mm is readbars on each sidemin.and & 50Ø grout tubes connectedlocating by jointdowels concrete 30MPa sealed on the underside. 80 thk. screed slab N12 @ 600 cts. project 600. 15mm set down for Precast concrete (beam, column & slab) carpet
14 15 16 17
Sunscreen
18 19
38 33 35 36 39 34 40 37 41 35 42 36 43 38
Veranda framing & roofing
20 21
Purlin C150 15 @ 10 Ampelite ‘Webglass reinforcement,1˚ tow 37 22 Beam 610 UB 101 H 23 45 square hardwood 39 4-N16 bars by & R6 ligatures; supports UC 450Ø boredtopiers; Connected precast column 8 N20 dowels Foundation 40 Re-entrant reinforcement running diagonally thekPa. 400W xcorner 200D g 450 wide concrete strip footing top &across btm, 50 ConnectBox to 38 244-L12 Trench drain edge beam by N16 tie bars @ 600 cts. max. Rigid 41 300 thk.grate concrete 25 200x75 PFC hop-dip 44 0.15-0.6m below ground level of silty to clay,hasrd moist External concrete paving 42 insulation on the outer side. Extends rock layerand with mass concrete Extremely or highly weatheredand basalt, 0.6m below groundSHS level 45 43 R6ligatures; ligatures; supports 600 26 39 150UC Ø bored bored piers piers;4-N16 4-N16bars bars & R6 supports UC30.0 Hot-dip 450Ø 46 Soil refusal point at 0.9m below ground level 40 Re-entrant reinforcement running diagonally across the corner galvanised hold dow 47 Angle ofgrate response Trench drain of footing members 41 External concrete paving 42 Foundation 43 600Ø bored piers 4-N16 bars and R6 ligatures; supports SHS
44 0.15-0.6m below ground level of silty clay,hasrd and moist Extremely or highly weathered basalt, 0.6m below ground level 45 46 Soil refusal point at 0.9m below ground level Foundation 47 Angle of response of footing members
Masonry wall
44 45 46 47
0.15-0.6m below ground level of silty clay,hasrd and moist Extremely or highly weathered basalt, 0.6m below ground level Soil refusal point at 0.9m below ground level Angle of response of footing members
27 28
2
29
Precast concrete (beam, colu
24
Foundation
30
300 thk. hollowcore connected by joint c 80 thk. screed slab carpet
31
700W x 600D bea couplers. 30x3 Neop 250Wx700DColumn rod ties, 6-N20 bars readbars locating do
32
Scale
44 1:20 0.15-0.6m below ground level of silty clay,hasrd and moist @ A0 Extremely or highly weathered basalt, 0.6m below ground level 45 46 Soil refusal point at 0.9m below ground level 47 Angle of response of footing members
47
47
D
26
Footing & Ground Slab
4
33 47
300
46
25 37
Subject
Project Name
Student Name
Construction Design ABPL30041_S01_2017
Assignment 2_Axonometric Drawing Western BACE by Six Degrees Architects
Cheuk Yi Lai
27
Tutor Name
28 Carrie Lim
34
41
29
35 36 37
39
Scale
1:20 @ A0
42
450 wide concrete 300 thk. concrete e insulation on the out
39 40 41 42 43
450Ø bored piers; 4 Re-entrant reinforce Trench grate drain External concrete pa 600Ø bored piers 4-
Foundation
43
44 45 46 47
44
2
D
E
F
G H
45
1
3
5
C
47
47
4
47 6
46
150 concrete slab-on cover. Sits above 0. compressible cardbo In slab hydronic hea 20 cover 15mm setdown for c 450Ø bored piers, 4 slab. SL92 x 2400 re 2m x 2m pad footing @250 cts. max. eac Connected to precas
38 38
B
90x390x190 exterio 70mm cavity with cavity below floor le 190x190x390 Core f and vertically @ 400
45
6
A
Vertical sunshade. SHS frame Horizontal sunshade each end. Supporte
450cover wide concrete strip footing top & btm, 50 btm kPa.& Connect 20 150 concrete slab-on-ground, 32 4-L12 MPa concrete, SL92 top 30 to 300 thk. concrete edge beam by N16 bars @ 600 max. 15mm setdown for0.2 carpet. lap mesh 500tie min. cover. Sits above polythene membrane and 100 min.cts. layer of Rigid insulation onpiers, the outer Extends to rock layer with mass concrete 450Ø bored 400 side. kPa, supports locally thickened compressible cardboard voidunreinforced, former ØSL92 bored 4-N16 barsrun & R6 ligatures; UC with min. 450 slab. xpiers; 2400 reinforcement top of slab In slab hydronic heating coils across meshsupports reinforcement Re-entrant reinforcement running diagonally across the corner 2m x 2m pad footing to support concrete precast column. N20 bars btm 20 cover Trenchcts. grate drain @250 max. each way; lap N16mesh bars 500 top @250 15mm setdown for carpet. min. cts. max. each way. Connected to precast column by 8 N20 dowels External concrete 450Ø bored piers, paving 400 kPa, unreinforced, supports locally thickened bored and4-L12 R6of ligatures; supports SHSConnect to 600 450Øwide concrete strip bars footing top & btm, 50 kPa. slab. SL92 xpiers 24004-N16 reinforcement top slab 300 edge beam by N16 tieprecast bars @ 600 cts. 2m xthk. 2m concrete pad footing to support concrete column. N20max. barsRigid btm insulation theeach outerway; side.N16 Extends to rock layer mass concrete @250 cts.on max. bars top @250 cts.with max. each way.
25
Scale
Viridian double glaz 150x60mm aluminiu Spandrel framing 15 Spandrel: Viridian s the inside layer
700W x 600D beam slab 50 kPa. Reinforced 4-RB2525-100 to readbar 31 30 300 thk. hollowcore 50 kPa. Each panel of width 1196mm is couplers. 30x3 Neoprene bearing stripmin.and between slab and beam connected by joint concrete 30MPa sealed on the underside. Footing &80 Ground Slab slab N12 32 250Wx700DColumn 50 kPa. cageproject bars, 4-N20 bars vertical & R10 thk. screed @ N20 600 cts. 600. 15mm set down for rod ties, 6-N20 bars horizontal. Connected to beam by 2 RB20 carpet 33 150 concrete slab-on-ground, 32 MPa SL92 btm & top 30 readbars locating dowels on each sideconcrete, & 50Ø grout tubes 700W x 600D beam 50 kPa. Reinforced 4-RB2525-100 to readbar 31 cover. Sits above 0.2 polythene membrane and 100 min. layer of couplers. 30x3 Neoprene bearing strip between slab and beam compressible cardboard void former 32 250Wx700DColumn 50 kPa. N20 cage bars, 4-N20 bars vertical & R10 34 In slab hydronic heating coils run across mesh reinforcement with min. rod ties, 6-N20 bars horizontal. Connected to beam by 2 RB20 20 cover locating dowels on each side & 50Ø grout tubes readbars 35 setdown Footing &15mm Ground Slab for carpet. lap mesh 500 min. 36 450Ø bored piers, 400 kPa, unreinforced, supports locally thickened slab.concrete SL92 x 2400 reinforcement top ofconcrete, slab 33 150 slab-on-ground, 32 MPa SL92 btm & top 30 2m x 2m pad footing support concrete precast column. N20 bars 37 cover. Sits above 0.2to polythene membrane and 100 min. layer of btm @250 cts. max. each way; N16 bars top @250 cts. max. each way. Footing &compressible Ground Slabcardboard void former Connected to precast column by 8across N20 dowels 34 In slab hydronic heating coils run mesh reinforcement with min.
450Ø bored piers; 4-N16 bars & R6 ligatures; supports UC Re-entrant reinforcement running diagonally across the corner Trench grate drain External concrete paving 600Ø bored piers 4-N16 bars and R6 ligatures; supports SHS
1:20 @ A0
Plasterboard ceiling Formply pelmet: Car Formply pelmet on t Suspended ceiling 3
G H
1
3
5
34 35 36
28
Subject
A
45
47
Construction Design ABPL30041_S01_2017
34
33
46
35
33
D
Footing & Ground Slab
41
Subject
2
44
37
6 38 Construction Design ABPL30041_S01_2017
1
47 43
45
29
4
700W x 600D beam 50 kPa. Reinforced 4-RB2525-100 to readbar couplers. 30x3 Neoprene bearing strip between slab and beam 43 250Wx700DColumn 50 kPa. N20 cage bars, 4-N20 bars vertical & R10 rod ties, 6-N20 bars horizontal. Connected to beam by 2 RB20 readbars locating dowels on each side & 50Ø grout tubes
42
26
D
C
31 32
16
15 B
300 thk. hollowcore slab 50 kPa. Each panel of width 1196mm is connected by joint concrete 30MPa min.and sealed on the underside. 80 thk. screed slab N12 @ 600 cts. project 600. 15mm set down for carpet
G H
1
A
42
45
3
5
44
24
4
6 2
D
C
30 25
47 B
25
90x390x190 exterior concrete blockwork. Stretcher bond. 41 70mm cavity with Foilboard ‘Ultra 20’ 20mm R2.4 insulation. Grout cavity below floor level 190x190x390 Core filled concrete blockwork. Reinforced horizontally and vertically @ 400 cts. Connected to slab with N12 strater bars
29
28
40
A
22 23 24 25 26
27 28
39
3
5
20 21
26
38
A17
24 Purlin C150 15 @ 100 cts. max., 1 row bridging. Bolted to 50x50x5 EA 25 Ampelite ‘Webglass GC’ polyester sheeting with woven mat reinforcement,1˚ towards box gu�er Beam 610 UB 101 Hot-dip41 galvanised 45 square hardwood battens @ 90 cts. screw fixed to joist 400W x 200D Box gutter with sump and downpipe 200x75 PFC hop-dip galvanised 150UC 30.0 Hot-dip galvinised. Anchored to slab by 4-M16 hot dip galvanised hold down 25 bolt on 20 base plate over 20 dry pack grout 41
29
19
So G il /F le le ve ve l1 l1 27 27 .7 .9 7 0
/F
l
30
l1
37
21
18
Masonry wall
28
22
25
18
39
1
21
l1 ve le F
3000
1/ 1000
g
lin
12a 2
40
37
27
32 36
29
38
35
34
.9
17
37
32
31 33
32
19
2
25 40 Veranda framing & roofing 14
26
26
30
i ce
12a
25
32
17
2
Vertical sunshade. 3mm perforated steel sheet supported by 40mm SHS frame 22 Horizontal25sunshade. 3mm perforated steel sheet. 50mm downturn at 19 each end. Supported by 30x10 steel flat 14 24
19 29
600 300
3
l1
ve
le
300
1000
g
ilin
e ev
31 12a
14
9 0.
40
2
Viridian double glazed low-e glass unit with ‘ThermoTech’ insulation 150x60mm 20 aluminium frame, square beading, anodised finish. Spandrel framing 150 PFC Hot-dip galvinised 21 glass panel; laminated glass with colour on Spandrel: Viridian single the inside layer 25 20 24
22 Sunscreen
25
31
10
30
3600
35
22
14
19
18 34
32
17
35
33
33
12a
36
34 9
14 15 16 17
25
16
8
2
35
33
G
12
15
31
13
1
Windows & Spandrel
14
8
2
1
21 16
32
13
l1
ve
Plasterboard ceiling 3600 AFL with Tontine 190mm R3.5 batts Formply pelmet: Carter Holt Harvey ‘Formrite’, black on both sides Formply pelmet on timber framing Suspended ceiling 3000 AFL; timber-framed 450mm max. cts. 20
7
14
7
9 0.
11 12 12a 13
32
15
le
/F
G
1
Internal 16
12a Internal Formply pelmet on timber framing Viridian double glazed low-e unit with ‘ThermoTech’ 14 13 Suspended ceiling 3000 AFL;glass timber-framed 450mm max. insulation cts. 150x60mm aluminium frame, square beading, anodised finish. 15 11 Plasterboard ceiling 3600 AFL with Tontine 190mm R3.5 batts 16 Spandrel framing 150 PFC Hot-dip galvinised Formply Carter Holt Harvey ‘Formrite’, black on both 12 17 Spandrel:pelmet: Viridian single glass panel; laminated glass withsides colour on Formply pelmet on timber framing 12a the inside layer 13 Suspended ceiling 3000 AFL; timber-framed 450mm max. cts. Windows & Spandrel
Internal
Girts C150 12 @600 cts. max. Girts C150 12 @600 cts. max. 18
14
10
13
v
le
1. 10
1000
Pa
30
.9
Colourbond parapet capping; inner lining is Lysaght ‘Trimdeck’ metal cladding External wall cladding. 0.7mm thick folded Cor-ten panels Kingspan AirCell 8mm foam sheet with perforated foil facing R0.2. 150mm overlap and tapped; 20mm thk. spacer biscuit between foil and cladding
9 10 32
30
1 el
7 8
9
12
le
00
7.
13
et
p ra
5
18
12
1
380x100 PFC. Connected to beam with 10 plate bracket with seat
18 framing Parapet
10
1/ F
P
3600
a ar
1. 10
3600
pe
Exposed laminated beam (30mm precamber). 600Dx115W. Connected to precast column with10 plate bracket & 3-M20 ferrules 45x90 MGP12 Roof battens. @900 cts. max. perpendicular to roof fall and @1200 cts. max. along roof fall. J24090 HY joist @ 900 cts max. Fixed to beam using BMT strap-brace screwed at each end
4
3600
00
2
8
12
30
7.
Versiclad 75mm R2.6 ‘Spacemaker’ structural insulated roof panels. 1.5˚ fall. Panel width 1000mm overlap 100mm. Screw fixed onto ba�ens.
5 9
11
10 9
3 t1
1
3 5
11 4
11 Plasterboard ceiling 3600 AFL with Tontine 190mm R3.5 batts WindowsFormply & Spandrel pelmet: Carter Holt Harvey ‘Formrite’, black on both sides 12
Roof framing & covering 6
11
pe
ra
Pa
3
4
00
7.
3 t1
9 Girts C150 12 @600 cts. max. 10 Internal Girts C150 12 @600 cts. max.
7 1
5. 50
Pa
82
00
7.
13
D
0.15-0.6m below gro Extremely or highly Soil refusal point at Angle of response o
06
CONSTRUCTION ANALYSIS
Melton South Commercial (business centre) Jun, 2017 AutoCAD Construction analysis / physical modelling Academic (Bachelor of Environments) This is a study of the construction strategies and building systems of a two-storey business centre in Melton South. It involved the identification and evaluation of structural systems, material selection and architectural detailing in relation to the design intent, building scale, function and geotechnical conditions. The study was based on the cross-referencing of construction drawings, shop drawings and construction photos, and presented in the form of an axonometric drawing and physical model.
G/F column &footing connection
G/F masonry wall & concrete edge beam
43
Insulated roof panels and structure
CONCRETE PLINTH AT CENTRES TO SUIT BMU TRACK SPAN
BMU TRACK
00
47200
WIND TURBINE
R 17
04 A4.3
BMU SHED
WALKWAY PLATFORM
1300
BMU TRACK
ROOF PLAN SCALE 1:500 @ A2
CONCRETE PAVING
DOWNPIPE BELOW CONCRETE PAVINGS
ALUMINIUM FLASHING TO PARAPET
700
01 A4.3
02 A4.3
1000
ROOF EDGE PROTECTION1000MM HIGH STEEL BALUSTRADE
500
STEEL OUTTRIGGERS
ASSIGNMENT OF STRUCTURAL STEEL BRACING AND SECONDARY CURTAIN WALL TO DOUBLE SKIN FACADE
500
02 A4.3
03 A4.3
BMU CRADLE FOR TWO MEN
03 A4.3
5240
500
5380
500
BMU PLAN SCALE 1:50 @ A2
AXONOMETRIC DIAGRAM NOT TO SCALE 03 A5.3
SCREED WITH WATERPROOF MEMBRANE FALL TO DRAINAGE OUTLET
STRUCTURAL STEEL BRACING
MECHANICAL LOUVRES
STEEL BALUSTRADE BEHIND TOP OF PARAPET
STEEL BALUSTRADE
CONCRETE PAVER
PARAPET FLASHING
730
SPANDREL
POLYPAD PEDESTAL
01 A5.3
BMU CRADLE
1030
1700
RL 280.00
2600
RL 280.00
INSULATED SPANDREL UNIT
RL 276.00
REINFORCED CONCRETE BEHIND
MECHANICAL FLOOR
RIGID INSULATION
1000
STEEL OUTTRIGGER
RL 272.00
BATT INSULATION
4000
REINFORCED CONCRETE SLAB
RL 276.00
200
4000
1000 HIGH STEEL BALUSTRADE
MECHANICAL LOUVRES
BAND BEAM BEHIND
ROOF DRAINAGE
ALUMINIUM STACK JOINT
OFFICE
DOUBLE GLAZED CURTAIN WALL
SUSPENDED CEILING
RL 272.00
STEEL MESH WALKWAY
RL 268.00
FIRE STOP
REINFORCED CONCRETE EDGE BEAM SECONDARY CURTAIN WALL TO DOUBLE SKIN FACADE ALUMINIUM FRAME
1350
03 A4.3
1350
1350
1350
PARTIAL SOUTH ELEVATION SCALE 1:100 @ A2
1350
1350
1350
1350
BMU CRADLE FOR TWO MEN
1350
1350
1350
STRUCTURAL STEEL BRACING
CURTAIN
SECONDARY CUATRAIN WALL
500
04 A4.3
1000
OFFICE
600
SECTION SCALE 1:50 @ A2 SUBJECT
ABPL90118 APPLIED ARCHITECTURAL TECHNOLOGY (SM1_2018) TUTOR
PETER NEAL
DRAWN BY
Cheuk Yi LAI
ASSIGNMENT 4
DETAIL AT CROWN LEVEL
DRAWING NO.
A4.3
07
HIGH-RISE TOWER
Melbourne CBD Commercial (office tower) Jun, 2018 Rhino / Grasshopper / AutoCAD / Vray Detail drawing / technical drawing / building technology Academic (Master of Architecture) This is a design proposal for a high-rise office building in Melbourne CBD with thorough considerations on economic feasibility, building codes, construction systems, energy performance and maintenance. The building consists of a reinforced concrete structural system and features a steel diagrid bracing that wraps around the building exterior for lateral resistance. The diagrid bracing also provides for a unique aesthetics and significant environmental benefits (by allowing for a double skin facade).
45
1000MM STEEL BALUSTRADE
580
3MM THK ALUMINIUM PARAPET CAPPING
LYSAGHT TOPSPAN40 (40MM) ALUMINIUM TOP HAT
570
THERMAL BROKEN EXTRUDED ALUMINIUM STACK JOINT
6MM THK ALUMINIUM PANEL
ETERNOIVICA NM2 PEDESTAL HEIGHT 40MM-70MM 80MM THK CEMENT SCREED WITH BITUMINOUS MEMBRANE
DRAINAGE ANSTON 600MM X 600MM X 40MM CONCRETE PAVER
3MM THK ALUMINIUM FLASHING
INSULATED SPANDREL UNIT
80
03 A4.3
200
RL 280.00
BATT INSULATION
200MM THK REINFORCED CONCRETE SLAB
450 900
1670
FIRE STOP
PVC DRAINAGE PIPE
200MM C-SECTION
900MM DEEP REINFORCED CONCRETE EDGE BEAM
CONCRETE PARAPET
650MM DEEP REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAM BEHIND
BATT INSULATION
MECHANICAL FLOOR GALVANISED SHEETING
INSULATED SPANDREL UNIT
600 X 600MM REINFORCED CONCRETE COLUMN BEHIND
1350
THERMAL BROKEN EXTRUDED ALUMINIUM STACK JOINT
160
80
THERMAL BROKEN EXTRUDED ALUMINIUM STACK JOINT
300
ALUMINIUM MECHANICAL LOUVRES BITUMINOUS MEMBRANE 6MM THK ALUMINIUM PANEL
01 A5.3
600
PARAPET SECTIONAL DETAIL SCALE 1:10 @ A2
40
170
STEEL BALUSTRADE
CEMENT SCREED WITH BITUMINOUS MEMBRANE 600MM X 600MM X 40MM TILE
600
02 A5.3
PLAN SCALE 1:10 @ A2
BUILDING MAINTENANCE UNIT
980
STEEL BALUSTRADE
160
ETERNOIVICA NM2 PEDESTAL HEIGHT 40MM-70MM ANSTON 600MM X 600MM X 40MM CONCRETE PAVER
200
FREELY LAID BMU TRACK
120
CONCRETE PLINTH
80MM THK CEMENT SCREED WITH BITUMINOUS MEMBRANE
200
RL 280.00
200MM THK REINFORCED CONCRETE SLAB
650MM DEEP REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAM BEHIND
SUBJECT
03 A5.3
BMU RAIL SECTIONAL DETAIL SCALE 1:10 @ A2
ABPL90118 APPLIED ARCHITECTURAL TECHNOLOGY (SM1_2018) TUTOR
PETER NEAL
DRAWN BY
Cheuk Yi LAI
ASSIGNMENT 4
DETAIL AT CROWN LEVEL
DRAWING NO.
A5.3
1
2
4
3
5
7
6
8
9
44200
A B C D E F G H I 01 A2.1
LOW RISE STRUCTURAL LAYOUT SCALE 1:250 @ A2
1
2
4
3
5
7
6
8
9
44200 5400
5400
5400
5400
5400
5400
5400
5400
500 1150
5400
4800
A
5400
3600
B
5400
3600
C
5400
E
5400
44200
4200
D
5400
F G 5400
0
3600
3600
4200
4850
5400
H 4200
1150 500
I 02 A2.1
BUILDING ELEMENT
PROFILE
SKY RISE STRUCTURAL LAYOUT SCALE 1:250 @ A2
DIMENSIONS (MM)
MAXIMUM SPAN (MM)
EDGE BEAM
500 W x 900 D
10800
PRIMARY BAND BEAM
2400 W x 650 D
10800
SECONDARY BAND BEAM
1200 W x 650 D
10800
DIAGRID BRACING
500 x 500
24000 (6 STOREYS)
450 x 500
-
OUTTRIGGER COLUMN
CORE SLAB
PODIUM: 1000 X 1000 LOW-RISE: 900 X 900 MID-RISE: 800 X 800
HIGH-RISE: 700 X 700 SKY RISE: 600 X 600
LOW-RISE: 600 THK MID-RISE: 500 THK
HIGH-RISE: 400 THK SKY RISE: 300 THK
SUBJECT
200 THK
ABPL90118 APPLIED ARCHITECTURAL TECHNOLOGY (SM1_2018)
-
TUTOR
4800
PETER NEAL
47
DRAWN BY
Yue GAN Cheuk Yi LAI Hao LIN
ASSIGNMENT 2
DRAWING NO.
STRUCTURE
A2.1
08
HERITAGE CENTRE
Hong Kong Feb, 2016 AutoCAD / SketchUp / Photoshop Heritage revitalisation / documentation Internship
Cultural / heritage
This is a heritage revitalisation project I participated during my internship at Meta4 Design Forum. The project involved the transformation of a police station, built in the colonial era, into a heritage information centre. The centre accommodates three gallery spaces and an outdoor cafe; a ramp was added for accessibility requirements. I was responsible for building the SketchUp model as shown above. A new public toilet was also designed, which is located in the vicinity of the information centre. I assisted in the amendments of the plans, sections and elevations shown on the left.
49
1
2
3
4
5
6
09
FACADE DESIGN
Jan, 2017 China Commercial SketchUp Facade proposal / massing studies Internship This is a facade design I proposed during my internship at Arup for a commercial building in China. Energy efficiency was the primary concern. Therefore, terracotta louvres were applied onto the south, east and west-facing faรงades as a shading device. On the south-facing facade, the louvres form a spiral that aims to express the young and energetic brand image of our client. The louvres wrap around the cylindrical core of the building and create several outdoor spaces as an extension to the indoor communal areas. Massing studies were conducted using SketchUp to test different possible forms. The proposed design is based on test no. 4, which presents a simplistic yet elegant gesture, while placing emphasis on the central core.
51