The Daily Free Press
Year xlii. Volume lxxxiii. Issue XXV
WHAT A DRAG Graphic warning labels on tobacco products ruled out, page 3.
[
Tuesday, October 16, 2012 The Independent Student Newspaper at Boston University
CELL-ULAR
New Nobel Prize award stirs stem-cell controversy, page 5.
]
www.dailyfreepress.com
ONE FOR WON
Field hockey defeats UMaine, loses to Hofstra, page 8.
WEATHER
Today: Partly cloudy/High 56 Tonight: Clear/Low 38 Tomorrow: 62/47 Data Courtesy of weather.com
Elie Wiesel talks ancient prophets, modern values SG election cycle reverts to previous timeline after vote By Taylor Burke Daily Free Press Contributor
In his first of three annual public lectures at Boston University, professor Elie Wiesel focused on how the prophecies of Ezekiel relate to today’s generations and the values society encompasses. “I admire Ezekiel and I fear him,” Wiesel said. “He has a passion for truth, and for his love. He is the prophet of exile, yet Jerusalem is in him. He doesn’t dwell in the Holy City, but the Holy City dwells in him.” Wiesel, a writer, Nobel Peace Prize recipient and Holocaust survivor, spoke before a crowd of more than 1,000 students, professors and Boston residents in Metcalf Hall Monday night for the lecture, entitled “In the Bible: Ezekiel and His Vision of Our Time.” BU President Robert Brown introduced Wiesel. “I have pride, because it is my pleasure to welcome Elie Wiesel, yet sadness because it is usually Dr. John Silber [who introduces him], who passed away this year,” Brown said. The late Dr. Silber, president emeritus, recruited Wiesel to teach at BU more than four decades ago. Since 1976, Wiesel has been the Andrew W. Mellon Professor in the Humanities. In his lecture, Wiesel weighed in on how the lessons from the Jewish prophet Ezekiel, who was exiled from Jerusalem, are especially important to generations today. The book of Ezekiel is a story of a prophet unlike any other, namely because his story makes readers at first doubt God’s power, Wi-
By Margaret Waterman Daily Free Press Staff
TAYLOR HARTZ/DAILY FREE PRESS STAFF
Professor Elie Wiesel delivers his lecture on the topic, “In the Bible: Ezekiel and His Vision of Our Time,” Monday night in the Metcalf Ballroom in the first of his lecture series.
esel said. “Based on Ezekiel’s actions, we wonder are there no good people in the land, or no just men, you might ask,” he said. “You would wonder if God abandoned all of his people.” Ezekiel’s story is relatable to the generation of Holocaust survivors because his story offers insight into the consequences of violence that could ultimately be applied to the future, Wiesel said. “Professor Wiesel expanded on the lessons of these prophecies and what it means for us to be human beings,” said Joel Udwin, a School of
Management junior and president of the Hillel Student Board. “Ezekiel’s story applies to us today because we’re in an age where we need to step up and recognize our values, and see where we need to go to hold true to our values,” Udwin said. Natalie Landau, a College of Arts and Sciences sophomore, said Wiesel’s talk reminded her of her Jewish heritage. “Considering what Elie Wiesel has been through, and given that he’s still incredibly active, you can recognize that he’s really passion-
Elie, see page 2
Congressional candidate Sean Bielat faces tough crowd in debate By Allison DeAngelis Daily Free Press Staff
While Fourth Congressional District Republican candidate Sean Bielat continued to challenge Democrat Joseph Kennedy III’s experience, he was hit hard with questions about the Paul Ryan budget, women’s rights and partisanship during their third debate at Wellesley College Monday night. Jo-Ann Berry, co-chair of the League of Women Voters of Massachusetts’ Citizen Education Committee, moderated the debate, which was sponsored by Wellesley College and LWV and featured questions from the League and Wellesley students. Early in the debate, Bielat hit a bump in the road when Wellesley students asked him if he supported women’s rights. “I’m pro-life,” Bielat said in a live stream of the debate on the Wellesley College website. “I think, though, when I hear women’s issues, I hear the issues that matter to us all. I hear ‘How are we going to pay our bills? How are we go-
ing to make sure we have jobs? How are our families going to grow and prosper?’ Those are all women’s issues.” Kennedy responded by telling the audience what they could expect if Republicans gained control of Congress. “Let’s be realistic about what a Republicanled Congress means and the impacts that that has on women’s health,” he said, citing 10 initiatives the current Congress has brought up to reduce a woman’s access to healthcare and abortions. Partisanship played a large role in the debate, which seeped into discussions about the national budget and healthcare. Kennedy brought up the “Ryan budget” many times, saying that his opponent supports it despite its flaws. “Putting the specifics and the [tax] cuts aside, I think, Sean, it is fair to say that you have embraced the framework of the Ryan budget,” Kennedy said. “And the framework of the Ryan budget is big cuts and big tax breaks, and that is
not reflective of a society where each of us has to do our part.” Although audience members were told questions should address both candidates, several audience questions singled out Bielat during the night, questioning his bipartisanship and his reasons for running. One audience member asked whether Bielat could resist being a “whole-sale Republican” if he represented a largely democratic state. “I don’t know where you heard that I was a whole-sale Republican ... It is certainly true that more of my ideas and beliefs align with the Republican party,” he said. Bielat told the audience that he had not received much aid from his party, and said Kennedy’s politics were more in line with the Democratic Party than his were with the Republican Party. Bielat said trying to link himself to Paul Ryan was a Democratic Party message, and
Debate, see page 2
Student Government voted Monday night to nullify the amendment to their election cycle made in February, reinstating the academicyear Senate term. The amendment, which changed the Boston University election cycle to a calendar-year system, reportedly passed with a proxy that should not have been counted. “We found that the methods used to pass the voting timeline change were unconstitutional,” said Jonathan Donald, one of SG’s judicial commissioners and a College of Arts and Sciences senior. “Howard [Male] had a senator who had missed four consecutive Senate meetings give him a proxy.” Donald said the former election timeline was to be automatically reinstated unless the Senate were to vote to uphold the calendaryear cycle. Andrew Cho, a senator, motioned to have the calendar-year timeline reinstated, but SG almost unanimously turned it down. Donald explained that SG rules dictate that any senator who misses that many meetings must cede their seat and their voting rights, meaning that the senator in question is unable to become or give a proxy. “The senator who was giving Howard the proxy power was not to be seated senator for that meeting,” he said. Cherice Hunt, director of communication, said SG is in talks with the administration about how the process of changing the election timeline will work. “We can’t actually officially say that the change has happened,” Hunt, a College of Communication junior, said. Sophia Woyda, vice president of internal affairs, said reverting back to the old election cycle would benefit the student body as a whole. “I think the overturning of the amendment and the return back to the election cycle will allow the freshmen who would want to run for executive board in the spring to have more experience, to allow seniors who would like to run for executive board to do that,” Woyda said. Woyda, a CAS senior, said she was glad the motion to reinstate the January-to-January election timeline did not pass. “I personally am happy that it did change back because it really does give the executive board more opportunities to build their team,
SG, see page 2
Post-doctoral student suffers mild injuries after chemical spill in ENG building By Lauren Dezenski Daily Free Press Staff
A Boston University post-doctoral chemistry associate student was injured in a chemical spill on the eighth floor of the Life Science and Engineering Building at about 4 p.m. on Monday, said BU spokesman Colin Riley. Spandan Chennamadhavuni was working on the eighth floor of the chemistry lab at 24 Cummington St. when a trifluoroacetic acid reaction spilled over, splashing his arms and face, said Veronique Martin, a fellow post-doctoral chemistry associate student. The student used the lab deluge shower in the lab to decontaminate himself immediately after coming in contact with the chemicals, said Boston Fire Department spokesman Steve MacDonald. No one else was injured in the spill. Chennamadhavuni was wheeled out of the Life Sciences building on a stretcher with minor injuries at about 4:25 p.m. He
was taken to a Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Riley said. The Boston Fire Department Hazardous Materials Response Unit arrived at the scene, in addition to the BU Police Department and Boston Emergency Medical Services. At least five fire trucks, six response vehicles, four BUPD cruisers and two EMS trucks were on scene. The Boston Fire Department cleared the scene, then the BU Office of Environmental Health and Safety took over, Riley said. People who were on the eighth floor were brought outside until the scene was cleared, Riley said. BUPD vehicles blocked traffic onto Cummington Street while the acid spill was being contained. Students were let back into the building at 5:10 p.m. Amy Gorel contributed to the reporting of this article.
MICHELLE JAY/DAILY FREE PRESS STAFF
The Boston Fire Department Hazardous Materials Response Unit are on the scene after Boston University post-doctoral student Spandan Chennamadhavuni came into contact with acid at the Life Sciences Building Monday afternoon.