free
TUESDAY
march 28, 2017 high 50°, low 31°
t h e i n de p e n de n t s t u de n t n e w s pa p e r of s y r a c u s e , n e w yor k |
N • Funding threatened
P • UU is you
United States Attorney General Jeff Sessions on Monday said federal dollars could be withheld from “sanctuary cities,” including the city of Syracuse. Page 3
dailyorange.com
University Union has been working to bring students’ favorite entertainers to campus since its inception in 1962, a job its members treat like a four-year internship. Page 16
S • In the dome
The Carrier Dome is set to get a renovation. Take a look back at how the Carrier Dome came to be after the old Archbold stadium was deemed not good enough. Page 8
city
Chuck’s hearing adjourned
NUKED DEAL Lawmakers question subsidies for nuclear plants
By Jacob Gedetsis enterprise editor
New York state has proposed allocating significant money to its nuclear power plants to keep them running. The plants account for much of the state’s electricity generation. Here is a look at the state’s overall sources of electricity generation in December 2016, the most recent data available.
NUCLEAR FUELS
2 7. 5 %
3 9. 4 %
source: u.s. energy information administration
3 3.1
NUCLEAR ENERGY
76.3
52.9
SWITZERLAND
FNILAND
34.5 34.3 33.7 33.5
SWEDEN
37.5
ARMENIA
SLOVENIA
HUNGARY
SLOVAKIA
UKRAINE
FRANCE
38
BELGIUM
56.5 55.9
Here are the 10 countries that rely the most on nuclear energy, with the percentage of their electricity generation that comes from nuclear power
NEW YORK’S SOURCES OF ELECTRICITY
$962 MILLION
50
PERCENT
%
Amount in subsidies that New York state has proposed for its nuclear plants over a two-year period, beginning in 2017
Amount of the state’s power that will come from clean and renewable sources by 2030, according to its Clean Energy Standard source: new york state
graphic illustration by lucy naland presentation director
source: nbc news
By Michael Burke news editor
R
ecent developments in Albany have put the future of upstate New York’s nuclear power plants in question, with some lawmakers at odds over proposed subsidies that would keep the plants running. New York state Gov. Andrew Cuomo and the state’s Public Service Commission have proposed a bailout program, which would cost up to $7.6 billion over 12 years, for three plants, including the James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant in Oswego County. The subsidies, which would be covered by a $2 monthly charge to state residents, are set to go into effect Saturday. The subsidies, though, are currently being challenged in federal court, where plaintiffs argue that nuclear plants are harmful to energy markets. Additionally, in its one-house budget passed this month, the state Assembly opted not to include the subsidies, instead calling for a moratorium on the program until the end of this year. The Assembly and state Senate must negotiate a state budget by Saturday. The moratorium, lawmakers say, would give them ample time to gather more information about the subsidies, as some say the proposal has been rushed.
FOSSIL FUELS
In interviews, lawmakers said the debate over the subsidies stems from a desire to satisfy the state’s renewable energy goals while also preserving the state’s economy and jobs in the energy sector, many of which exist at the plants. “It’s not that I’m against these subsidies,” said Pamela Hunter, the Assembly representative for the district that includes Syracuse and a member of the state’s energy committee. “I’m just trying to get answers to big questions that we’re not getting yet.” Pat Wood, former chairman of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, and Peter Bradford, former chairman of the New York Public Service Commission, filed a motion Friday against the Public Service Commission in U.S. District Court seeking to have the subsidies dismissed. They claim that the subsidies would negatively impact the energy market, arguing that as nuclear plants have aged over the years, they’ve required maintenance and capital investments that have caused their operating costs to rise. “New nuclear power has been priced out of power markets completely,” the plaintiffs write in the motion. “... The nuclear industry has come to realize that it cannot thrive under today’s competitive conditions and has commenced an all-out political effort see nuclear page 4
Student-favorite bar Hungry Chuck’s scheduled hearing at the Onondaga Supreme Court for Tuesday morning regarding an asbestos abatement has been adjourned. Steve Theobald, Chuck’s owner, said that the bar’s landlord’s attorneys asked for the postponement, but that a new date has not been set. Theobald earlier this month filed a temporary restraining order against Syracuse 727 LLC, Chuck’s new landlord and the developers planning to demolish the structure at 727 S. Crouse Ave. — where Chuck’s is located — and construct a mixed-use building. The restraining order is currently preventing the developers from conducting an asbestos abatement inside Chuck’s, something that would at least temporarily require the bar to close. That restraining order still stands with the adjournment of Tuesday’s hearing. Chuck’s filed a lawsuit earlier this month that challenges the asbestos abatement and its lease termination notice. Theobald’s lawyer is asking for a preliminary injunction that would maintain the temporary restraining order and prevent the new landlord’s from entering the space for the abatement until a judge can rule on Chuck’s current lawsuit against the landlord. The central argument of the case rests upon a section in Chuck’s lease, which was absorbed by Syracuse LLC upon purchasing the bar, that states that its property owner has the right to “make repairs, additions, or alterations” within the bar’s premises. Chuck’s is arguing that an asbestos abatement goes beyond repairs and is instead a remedial measure. Josh Werbeck, Chuck’s lawyer, said he will argue the intention of that original lease agreement made between Theobald and his previous landlord. “We are going to argue … that there was never a suggestion that the landlord could come in and shut down the business for as long as they want just so they can do some work,” Werbeck said. Jared Hutter, co-owner of Syracuse 727 LLC, recently said he has cut buyout negotiations with Chuck’s, and as a result no longer cares about the asbestos abatements. He will wait until Chuck’s lease is terminated in August to do the mandatory abatement, see chuck’s page 4