The Daily Princetonian: November 5, 2019

Tuesday November 5, 2019 vol. cxliii no. 97

Twitter: @princetonian Facebook: The Daily Princetonian YouTube: The Daily Princetonian Instagram: @dailyprincetonian

{ www.dailyprincetonian.com }

IN TOWN

Alexander Road to begin estimated six month closure on Wednesday

By Caitlin Limestahl Contributor

PHOTO CREDIT: JON ORT / THE DAILY PRINCETONIAN

Construction work on Alexander Road last April.

This Wednesday, Nov. 6, a section of Alexander Road will close for nearly six months to replace two bridges and a culvert. The official detour route will lead to Route 1 via Faculty Road and Washington Road.

According to the University’s website, the bridges, “which are over 70 years old, are in poor condition and too narrow for today’s traffic.”

“Their replacements will be safer, wider, improve traffic flow and include shoulders and sidewalks on both sides,” the “Bridge Closure” website reads.

The construction aims to mitigate the bridge’s traffic, which today includes Tiger Transit. The lane widening is likely to accommodate the bus route that runs along Alexander Road.

According to the website, the transit schedule will remain the same during the closure, with the exception of the PTS/West, 693 Alexander, 100 Overlook/701 Carnegie, and Weekend Shopper routes.

More information about the route changes can be found online.

The project, which was first announced in August, is a combined effort of the New Jersey Department of Transportation and Mercer County. Planet Princeton reported that the University gave $250,000 in support of the project.

“Updates about the closure will be shared with the campus community through University communication channels starting later this fall,” Kristin Appelget, University Director of Community and Regional Affairs, wrote in an email, as previously reported by The Daily Princetonian.

These lines of communication are now available to the public and include a University website that offers an overview of the project and a listserv that will keep community members updated on the closure.

While the road is expected to reopen in April of 2020, the website acknowledges the likelihood of delays.

“Rain, snow and cold can impact the project’s completion,” the website states. “Unforeseen construction issues can arise, and can lead to delays beyond the planned April 20, 2020 completion date.”

BEYOND THE BUBBLE

Ukrainian ambassador Volodymr Yelchenko discusses Russia, governmental corruption

By Sandeep Mangat Contributor

Volodymyr Yelchenko, the Ukrainian ambassador to the United Nations, spoke at a luncheon moderated by politics professor Marzenna James in Prospect House on Monday, Nov. 4. At the event, he took questions from a number of professors and students.

Yelchenko began by elaborating on his experiences as an ambassador to Russia during the 2014 Crimea crisis, stating that it “was a total surprise” to him.

He said that most Ukrainians were taken aback because they did not expect their “biggest and closest neighbor to start aggression” and therefore “weren’t mentally prepared to defend the

country.”

Yelchenko emphasized what he saw as the absurdity of Russia’s annexation of Crimea and maintenance of a military base in that territory after the invasion. He noted, however, that “Putin did more for Ukrainian independence than any other person on this planet” by taking “many stupid, illogical, unprecedented, unjustified steps in 2014.”

He cited the subsequent diversification of Ukraine’s economy as evidence, arguing that after the crisis, Ukraine “had only 7% trade with Russia and 40% with the European Union” and that “the Ukraine does not import any gas[oline] from Russia.”

In addition, Yelchenko as-

BEYOND THE BUBBLE

serted that the Crimea crisis allowed Ukraine to expand its support system beyond Russia, though he admitted his opinion “is not very popular.”

When asked by a University professor about Putin’s attitude towards risk, Yelchenko answered that Putin pursues aggressive goals but is largely ignorant of the consequences of his actions. He stated that Putin had expected no Ukrainian opposition, thinking that Russia’s aggression would draw only a few protests and that “things would go back to normal soon.”

In addition, Yelchenko noted that subsequent sanctions against Russia were impactful and forced the Russian president to confront a sour reality.

JON ORT / THE DAILY PRINCETONIAN

Volodymyr Yelchenko, Ukrainian ambassador to the United Nations, with students and professors at a luncheon on Monday

See UKRAINE page 2

ON CAMPUS

Q&A with author, jour- U. professor Sabine Kastner receives nalist David Makovsky Award for Education in Neuroscience

Contributor

David Makovsky has built a career out of studying and reporting on Middle Eastern politics and the Israel-Palestinian conf lict. An author, journalist, teacher, and most recently a podcaster, Makovsky sat down with the Daily Princetonian to discuss the Middle East, his career, and his new book, Be Strong and of Good Courage: How Israel’s Most Important Leaders Shaped Its Destiny.

The Daily Princetonian: For starters, what is your background? Where did you study, what did you major in, and how did that impact the direction of your career?

David Makovsky: I grew

In Opinion

up in St. Louis. When I was seventeen years old, I had a very formative experience, and I thought that was a coming-of-age moment for me. It was Anwar Sadat’s historic visit to Israel in November 1977. It was an electrifying moment of the 20th century, that the leader of the largest Arab country said you know what, I’m getting on a plane, and I’m going to show up and speak at the parliament of the other side and tell them I don’t want war anymore.

It was a heroic moment, and I thought, there have been wars between the Arab states and Israel 1948, 56, 67, 73, and See MAKOVSKY page 2

Senior columnist Kaveh Badrei reflects on the frustrating theatrics of modern-day American politics and guest contributor Morgan Carmen questions the accuracy of oftcited statistics on maternal mortality in New Jersey.

PAGE 4

By Rachel Sturley Contributor

University professor Sabine Kastner accepted the Society for Neuroscience’s Award for Education in Neuroscience on Monday, Oct. 21, in Chicago.

The award honors her dedication to making neuroscience engaging for young audiences, specifically in creating an academic journal for and edited by children and teens.

Kastner shares the education award with Robert Knight, a professor of psychology and neuroscience at the University of California, Berkeley.

Together, Kastner and Knight founded Frontiers for Young Minds, an open-access online

journal that sparks interest in science and promotes youth involvement in the publishing process. Kastner is a professor of psychology at the Princeton Neuroscience Institute and has been at the University since 2000.

“Kids are incredibly curious [about neuroscience], but unfortunately that curiosity is not often met,” Kastner said.

“Science has an enormous speed. There are daily discoveries, and for the kids it’s really important to learn about science as it happens … [because] it will help them become our science leaders of tomorrow.”

Frontiers for Young Minds

Today on Campus 4:30 p.m.: How Might We Build Healthier Digital Spaces Architecture Building / N101 - Betts Auditorium

features articles about novel developments in various fields of natural science. These articles are specifically written for a target audience of students from ages eight to 15. The process of editing for clarity and accessibility by children in this age range facilitates connections between young scientists and elementary to middle school students.

Students can sign up through the website to become reviewers as individuals, in groups, or even with their whole classroom. Each young reviewer is paired with a mentor, who serves as their See NEURO page 2

WEATHER

By Sruti Chitluri

HIGH

61˚

LOW

36˚

Scattered Showers chance of rain:

50 percent

The Daily Princetonian

page 2

Tuesday November 5, 2019

Yelchenko said the Crimea crisis allowed Ukraine to branch out its support system beyond Russia UKRAINE Continued from page 1

The ambassador was also questioned on the differences of having a new Ukrainian president, Volodymyr Zelensky, who was elected in April of this year.

Yelchenko responded that “there are no strategic differences” and that the “political goal of Ukraine to integrate with the UN and NATO remains.”

Yelchenko added, however, that there are “technical differences,” given that the “younger generation doesn’t have the institutional memory of the previous government of Ukraine.”

When a professor questioned if Ukraine’s reputation as be-

ing one of the most corrupt countries is justified, particularly in light of U.S. President Donald Trump’s controversial July phone call with Zelensky, Yelchencko refuted the claim.

“There are much more corrupt countries in Africa and in some other parts of this world,” he said.

Yelchenko contended that though Ukraine does not necessarily witness higher levels of corruption, instances of corruption — for example, in the judicial system — are “just more visible.” He stated that Ukraine confronts “low-level corruption,” such as Ukrainians being “obliged” to bribe doctors or lawyers and that it is “certainly a problem.”

Although the professor also questioned the effects of “the corrupt elements of Ukraine” on Donald Trump’s presidency, Yelchenko did not respond to this.

Later in the luncheon, Yelchenko denied claims that Russia’s use of political technology tools has affected Ukrainian domestic politics, saying that the results of recent Ukrainian elections disprove such a claim.

He stated that Russia was “putting a lot of money and influence into anti-Western candidates,” but electoral outcomes did not turn out in their favor.

In addition, Yelchenko said that the current President won with an overwhelming majority, making Ukrainian history with

his landslide victory, and that he does not represent the type of candidate who the Russians supported.

Yelchencko did say that Russia’s impact on elections around the world is visible and disturbing. He gave the examples of Russia influencing elections in China and countries in Africa.

He conceded that people in Eastern Ukraine have access to Russian media channels and that this can lead these individuals to believe that what is presented to them “is the world.”

Yelchenko concluded on a note of unity, stating that Ukrainians do not have to completely denounce Russia. He gave the example of Ukrainian restaurants and bars, in which service

is offered in both Russian and Ukrainian. To that end, Yelchenko said, the people of Ukraine can “read Russian and write Russian” and accept Russian culture beyond the specter of the conflict between the two nations.

“We must not live by the wishes [of] a single country … [but] by the established rules — those established in the UN Charter,” Yelchenko said.

Yelchenko’s talk was sponsored by the programs in Russian, East European, and Eurasian Studies, as well as the History and Practice of Diplomacy, the Liechtenstein Institute on Self Determination, and the European Politics and Society.

Revealing the truth, one story at a time. join@dailyprincetonian.com

News.

Opinions.

Sports.

Every day.

join@dailyprincetonian.com

Tuesday November 5, 2019

Kastner, together with U.C. Berkeley professor Robert Knight, created academic journal for children and teens NEURO

Continued from page 1

.............

point of contact as they formulate feedback on articles. These pairings can be as geographically disparate as a child in Pakistan working with a graduate student in Knight’s lab at Berkeley. Modeled on the peer review process in academia, the author revises based on the child’s feedback before the paper is published on the site. “[This process] makes the papers better, and it gives a corpus of scientific papers that got a seal of approval from kids,” said Knight. “Kids feel empowered because their voice is being heard, and the mentors really enjoy this interaction.”

Knight also emphasized the benefit this platform has for teachers in STEM education as well as the students.

Kastner noted that the website has had readers from nearly every single country in the world. In founding the journal six years ago from what Kastner called a “grassroots movement,” Kastner and Knight tried to ensure that it would be free and accessible to all. Part of their initial vision was to reach schoolchildren in poorly resourced areas where this degree of exposure to science would not otherwise be available.

Dr. Gideon Caplovitz, an editor for the neuroscience section of the journal and a professor of psychology at the University of Nevada, Reno, nominated Kastner and Knight for this award. He mentioned that in his school district in Reno, he has noticed the need for this kind of platform.

“The teachers love it, the students love it, the feedback is incredible — and there’s appetite for more and more,” Caplovitz said. “These teachers really

The Daily Princetonian

want to use their class time for this, even though it’s not going to check a Common Core box.”

Kastner’s individual research focuses on the neural basis of cognition in humans and animals, aiming to answer questions about how the brain represents the visual world and how information selection guides behavior. Both she and Knight had done significant work with school-aged children in their surrounding areas before creating the journal, but both recognized a need to reach a larger audience.

“Each of them has a tremendous, tremendous track record of mentorship, of fostering community, of outreach in their own ways,” Caplovitz said of the pair. “This is not coming out of a vacuum; it is a culmination of a career.”

The Society for Neuroscience is the largest organization to support and represent neuroscience research in the world. With membership at 37,000 from 95 countries, they are the “gold standard,” according to Caplovitz, for all things neuroscience. He nominated Kastner and Knight not only to give them a “high five” for the risk they took in delving into this project, but also to increase visibility for Frontiers for Young Minds.

All three interviewees agreed that the next step for the website is to translate it into more languages. Currently available in English and Hebrew, they are working on making the journal available in Spanish, Portuguese, and Mandarin. Kastner said that her long term goal for Frontiers for Young Minds is to make it a globally accessible platform.

“An educated society is a better society, and what better place to start than kids learning the value of science?”

Knight said.

Want to see YOUR photos published in a newspaper?

Join ‘Prince’ photo!

page 3

PHOTO COURTESY OF SABINE KASTNER

From left to right: Robert Knight, co-recipient of the award from Berkeley, Cal.; Diane Lipscombe, the President of the Society for Neuroscience; and University psychology professor Sabine Kastner, corecipient of the award.

Markovsky: I was there as a journalist during the “Golden Age” of the nineties VENEZUELA Continued from page 1

.............

here’s the leader of the biggest Arab country saying “I want to end it.” That impacted me.

I went to Columbia as an undergraduate. I studied history and international relations. I ran an international student organization. I went to graduate school. I went to Harvard. I did my masters in Middle Eastern Studies. I thought I wanted to be a journalist and did that for eleven years. I came back, at the end of that adventure, that life.

I’ve been at this think tank at the Washington Institute for 19 years. I teach graduate students at John Hopkins. I worked in the office of the Secretary of State during the peace negotiations that Secretary of State John Kerry was conducting with Israelis and Palestinians. I’ve been very fortunate.

DP: What first got you interested in studying the Israeli-Palestinian conflict?

DM: It was the Sadat visit. I thought these two sides were fated to fight wars every ten years, and suddenly, this leader comes from out of the blue and said, “Enough. I want to end it.” And indeed, there was an Egypt-Israel Peace Treaty of 1979. If I look at my formative experience, it was really the Sadat visit, because until then, the idea of peace between Israel and the Arabs was unthinkable.

Now we have something

new. It’s beyond anything that people thought was possible five years ago.

DP: You talked about how you’ve been a journalist. How did your time as a journalist influence not only your opinions on the conflict but also the progression of your career?

DM: I was there as a journalist during the “Golden Age” of the nineties. The nineties was, you know, the Cold War had just ended, the Gulf War had just ended, and Israel had a gifted leader that we write about named Yitzhak Rabin. He was one of the four leaders we write about. He broke through the conundrum that people used to say, “If you’re strong, you don’t have to compromise. If you’re weak, you don’t have to compromise.” He said, no, it’s when you’re strong that you should want to compromise. He paid for his life with his views. He was killed by an Israeli in 1995. Covering that Rabin period, traveling around the world, to travel with him, to be there when a lot of these openings started, I felt like I had a front row seat to history in the nineties that these conflicts were solvable.

DP: You were just talking about how you’ve given talks in multiple college campuses, and you yourself are a professor at John Hopkins.

What do you think about student involvement in the Israel-Palestinian conflict?

What are important things students should know?

DM: My hope is that stu-

dents will come together for coexistence. I would like to see more Jewish-Americans and Muslim-Americans come together and look for solutions. Even if it means study tours to the region, visiting communities of each side, in this time of great polarization in the United States, we need more bridges. We don’t need more bypass roads. We need more light and less heat.

DP: Can you tell us about your book?

DM: The book is called Be Strong and of Good Courage. We feel that people are very despairing in this era of polarization. The idea is to write about four journeys, four leaders in Israel who made historic decisions against long odds. They met the bar of history. After the 2016 election, I came to Dennis [Ross, the book’s other co-author] and said, “We have to inspire people.”

People in this era of polarization, everyone goes into their own corner. They think that problems are too big and the leaders are too small.

We got to show them that there we’re leaders who met extraordinary challenges.

We hope it’ll inspire young people and older people, too, to want to know more about the conflict. We want people to engage and be hopeful in waging the battle for coexistence.

DP: Is there anything you’d like to add?

DM: We hope it’ll inspire people to want to learn more and want to engage.

join@dailyprincetonian.com

SRUTI CHITLURI / THE DAILY PRINCETONIAN

David Makovsky holding his new book

Opinion

Tuesday November 5, 2019

page 4

{ www.dailyprincetonian.com }

The politics of spectacle Kaveh Badrei

Senior Columnist

On Oct. 23, two dozen Republicans staged a new form of resistance to House Democrats’ impeachment inquiry into the President of the United States. While members of the House Intelligence Committee met in a private session to hear testimony with government officials and experts on Russia, Ukraine, and the Trump administration’s foreign policy, the group of House Republicans began their protest by chanting “Let us in! Let us in!” outside the doors before pushing Capitol Police away and charging the private chambers of the closed-door committee hearing.

This particular session was being held in a Sensitive Compartmented Information Facility (SCIF), where lawmakers can read and review classified documents and hear private testimonies. The protesting Republican members of Congress demanded access to the secret impeachment inquiry, going so far as to say it has been a “Soviet-style process” run by the Democrats of secret hearings and private depositions restricted to only few members.

Nevertheless, these lawmakers refused to leave the cham-

bers and proceeded to occupy the space for about five hours, derailing the interviews and depositions scheduled for the day, fomenting shouts between political parties, and demonstrating a physical side of the term “gridlock in Washington.”

Only hours later was it revealed that 12 of the Republicans involved in the protest were on committees involved in the impeachment inquiry themselves. Consequently, they were allowed to enter the SCIF without any issues, and they could have entered and observed the hearing without any issue whatsoever. Needless to say, this core fact was not mentioned by any of the 12 Republicans in the protest.

This instance of Republican protest and the theatrics of their storming the barred doors and shoving aside the Capitol Police officers only proves to demonstrate a fundamental truth about our politics in the United States.

Our society views politics as theater, as an inherently performative procedure in our public life. Politics is a game of the spectacle.

Last year, I wrote an article about the power of symbols in our politics, elaborating on the fact that the symbolism associated with political victories and progresses can serve the good of our nation and of peoples around the world. While I still think politics can create authentic symbols of righteousness,

progress, and change for the better, I realize now that the spectacle of politics dominates its possibility for symbolism.

Regardless of party, politicians and the institutional establishment around political life in our country values the optics and spectacular nature of government as entertainment rather than an organ of the state that necessitates honest confrontation with the truth and frank accountability.

For instance, the ongoing primary for the next Democratic candidate for the presidency has included four debates so far, but the Democratic National Convention announced at the beginning of the race that twelve debates were scheduled in all. The title of “debate” for these televised events is a misnomer. With each event, the sheer number of candidates on stage at the same time has made it nearly impossible for a true, vigorous, and substantive debate to take place amongst the candidates.

Instead of creating a space for lively discussion on policies and meaningful questions, these debates have morphed into spectacles of their own nature: something more akin to sporting events where each player has thirty seconds to launch their mode of attack or focus group-tested slogan. Moderators’ questions aim to pit competitors against each other for battle,

vol. cxliii

and candidates go for attacks on fellow candidates to gain airtime and acclaim post-debate. This might be good television, but it is not a debate. It is precisely a spectacle of our politics.

Unfortunately, it seems we live in a time when the more spectacular political decision garners more attention and thus more support from the people. The spectacle of politics is vastly more entertaining than the intricate details of substantive policy or the arduous task of governing a nation in the most complex sense, but this reliance upon the spectacle, the entertainment of our politics will ultimately lead us to a vacuous time when our politics are devoid of all means of moral validity and substantive achievement. When we regard our politics as a spectacle, the question of who can lead our country meaningfully and effectively pales in comparison to the question of who can entertain the American people most ridiculously and most amusingly. The politics of the spectacle threatens our country with a future more focused on entertainment and theatrics than good governance and leaders of good will and authenticity.

Kaveh Badrei is a senior Woodrow Wilson School concentrator from Houston, Texas. He can be reached at kbadrei@princeton. edu.

editor-in-chief

Chris Murphy ’20 business manager

Taylor Jean-Jacques’20 BOARD OF TRUSTEES president Thomas E. Weber ’89 vice president Craig Bloom ’88 secretary Betsy L. Minkin ’77 treasurer Douglas J. Widmann ’90 trustees Francesca Barber David Baumgarten ’06 Kathleen Crown Gabriel Debenedetti ’12 Stephen Fuzesi ’00 Zachary A. Goldfarb ’05 Michael Grabell ’03 John Horan ’74 Joshua Katz Rick Klein ’98 James T. MacGregor ’66 Alexia Quadrani Marcelo Rochabrun ’15 Kavita Saini ’09 Richard W. Thaler, Jr. ’73 Abigail Williams ’14 trustees emeriti Gregory L. Diskant ’70 William R. Elfers ’71 Kathleen Kiely ’77 Jerry Raymond ’73 Michael E. Seger ’71 Annalyn Swan ’73 trustees ex officio Chris Murphy ’20 Taylor Jean-Jacques’20

143RD MANAGING BOARD managing editors Samuel Aftel ’20 Ariel Chen ’20 Jon Ort ’21

Work for the most respected news source on campus.

head news editors Benjamin Ball ’21 Ivy Truong ’21 associate news editors Linh Nguyen ’21 Claire Silberman ’22 Katja Stroke-Adolphe ’20 head opinion editor Cy Watsky ’21 associate opinion editors Rachel Kennedy ’21 Ethan Li ’22 head sports editor Jack Graham ’20 associate sports editors Tom Salotti ’21 Alissa Selover ’21 features editor Samantha Shapiro ’21 head prospect editor Dora Zhao ’21 associate prospect editor Noa Wollstein ’21 chief copy editors Lydia Choi ’21 Elizabeth Parker ’21 associate copy editors Jade Olurin ’21 Christian Flores ’21 head design editor Charlotte Adamo ’21 associate design editor Harsimran Makkad ’22 cartoon editors Zaza Asatiani ’21 Jonathan Zhi ’21 head video editor Sarah Warman Hirschfield ’20 associate video editor Mark Dodici ’22 digital operations manager Sarah Bowen ’20

NIGHT STAFF

join@dailyprincetonian.com

copy Heather Gaulke ’22 Katie Heinzer ’22 Tanvi Nibhanupudi ’23 Grey Raber ’23 design Britney Guo ’23 Kenny Peng ’22

Opinion

Tuesday November 5, 2019

page 5

{ www.dailyprincetonian.com }

Maternal Mortality: How do we rank? And why?

Morgan Carmen

Guest Contributor

In New Jersey and in the rest of the nation, the maternal mortality rate has been on the rise for the past two decades. Most of these pregnancy-related deaths are preventable — according to the CDC, 60% of maternal deaths could be avoided. Pregnancy has become especially dangerous for women of color, who are at least three times as likely to die from pregnancy-related complications.

Over 100,000 women give birth in New Jersey each year, and First Lady of New Jersey Tammy Murphy has made it her mission to make the state safer for these women and their babies. However, the way Murphy and her supporters measure New Jersey’s maternal mortality rate misrepresents the magnitude of the maternal mortality crisis — both locally and nationally.

This past January, Murphy launched Nurture NJ, her “statewide awareness campaign that is committed to reducing infant and maternal mortality and morbidity,” according to the initiative’s website. In a variety of public appearances, Murphy has claimed that the state ranks 45th out of the 50 states in terms of maternal mortality.

This statistic has been cited

by New Jersey columnists, the

Associated Press, and advocacy groups, and all for good reason: mothers are dying unnecessary deaths, and the threat of being known as one of the worst states for maternal health is conceivable as a motivating force for remedial action.

But where does the figure come from, and is it accurate?

The ranking appears to come from the United Health Foundation’s 2018 Health of Women and Children Report. Nurture NJ cites the same ranking on its website and attributes it to the United Health Foundation.

The Foundation’s 2018 report maintains that New Jersey has a maternal mortality rate of 38.1 pregnancy-related deaths per 100,000 live births.

The report’s maternal mortality rate and ranking for New Jersey, as well their interpretations, are misleading for several reasons.

First, the 2018 report only supplies data for 48 states. As a footnote in the report explained, results for Alaska and Vermont were “suppressed due to inadequate sample size and/ or to protect identity.” Even if the rankings were accurate, New Jersey would be 45th out of 48 states in maternal mortality; the frequent characterization of the ranking — as if it were out of all 50 states — is incorrect.

Second, the rankings are not accurate because the values used to compute the rank-

ing are not accurate. New Jersey’s 2018 maternal mortality rate was not 38.1 as the report claimed. The 2018 report cited death certificate data from the Mortality Files of the Center for Disease Control (CDC) Wonder Online Database, years 2011 to 2015. This five-year spread indicates that the report’s “2018 ranking” and “2018 value” for maternal mortality rates by state are not actually representative of 2018, but rather a period of time three years prior.

When using more recent data from CDC Wonder Online Database, specifically from years 2013 to 2017, New Jersey’s maternal mortality rate appears to be 46.6 deaths per 100,000 live births. From 2013 to 2017, there were 238 death certificates that reported pregnancy-related causes. According to New Jersey State Health Assessment Data, there were 510,971 live births during that five-year period. The maternal mortality rate (MMR) thus seems to be 46.6: the rate is computed by dividing the number of pregnancy-related deaths by that of live births, then multiplying the figure by 100,000.

But New Jersey’s maternal mortality rate is likely even higher. Death certificate data, the chief source of the CDC Wonder Online Database’s Mortality Files, have been shown to largely underreport maternal deaths.

Additionally, the classifica-

tion of maternal death in the CDC’s Mortality Files is listed as “pregnancy, childbirth and the puerperium.” The puerperium refers to the approximate 42 days after childbirth, during which the mother’s body returns to its nonpregnant state.

The CDC’s definition of pregnancy-related death, however, extends beyond the 42 days following birth: it includes the full year following the termination of pregnancy. The death certificate data does not account for the remainder of the year following birth, a time during which more maternal deaths certainly occur.

Given the skewed nature of the United Health Foundation’s 2018 maternal mortality rates, it is difficult to tell where exactly New Jersey falls in reference to other states. The foundation’s 2019 Health of Women and Children Report, which uses data from 2013 to 2017 as was used above, ranks New Jersey as 47th out of the 50 states in maternal mortality. Once again, the five-year period is not representative of the report’s listed “2019 ranking.”

Yet, even if the figures were accurate with respect to year, the very practice of employing rankings in discussions of maternal mortality is suspect.

According to sociologist Elizabeth Mitchell Armstrong, a professor specializing in reproductive and maternal

health here at Princeton University, “rankings are strange statistics to use in the first place.” She alleges that, in comparing New Jersey to the national rate, we normalize the national rate, which is highly abnormal — higher than that of any other developed nation.

Further, the maternal mortality rate alone does not even begin to account for the number of mothers who come close to death — who experience “maternal morbidity.” According to the Health Resources and Services Administration, maternal morbidity occurs at a rate 100 times greater than maternal mortality.

Tammy Murphy’s crusade to improve maternal outcomes is urgently needed. Yet, misleading characterizations about the magnitude of the maternal mortality crisis, however big or small, can hamper that urgency. Regardless of how New Jersey compares to the rest of the nation, the lives of mothers throughout the state are at stake—unnecessarily.

We know these deaths—and near-deaths— can be prevented. That, in itself, should be enough to inspire action.

Morgan Carmen is a junior from New York City, majoring in the Woodrow Wilson School.

She can be reached at mcarmen@ princeton.edu.

(if(equal? web love) (join the ‘Prince’ now) (join anyway))

Join the ‘Prince’ web and multimedia team.

Email join@dailyprincetonian.com

Like sports? Write for the sports section!

Email: join@dailyprincetonian.com

Tuesday November 5, 2019

Sports

page 6

{ www.dailyprincetonian.com } FIELD HOCKEY

Clinched! No. 7 field hockey earns NCAA birth

By Molly Milligan

onds to go before the half, their own destiny as they sophomore midfielder Han- seek a second Ivy League tinah Davey hammered home tle in three years. Neff also Over fall break, No. 7 Field a shot to even the score, 1–1. earned Ivy League Defensive Hockey (12–4, 6–0 Ivy League) The Crimson went up Player of the Week honors posted victories against then⁠ 2–1 early in the third quar- following Princeton’s vicNo. 14 Harvard (11–4, 5–1 Ivy) ter but failed to convert on tory at Harvard. and Cornell (9–7, 3–3 Ivy). two consecutive corner atThe Tigers concluded fall In recent years, Princeton tempts. Left lying within break with a Sunday matchversus Harvard has proved striking distance, Princeton up against Cornell. As it was to be the decisive game on still need to retie the score. the last home game of the the Ivy League calendar. Last First-year midfielder Sammy season, Princeton also celyear, the visiting Crimson Popper got the job done late ebrated Senior Day. The Class defeated the Tigers 3–1 and in the quarter. She dribbled of 2020 includes goalie Grace claimed the league’s regular to her right before knock- Baylis, fullback Maddie Bacseason title. In the second ing the ball home, erasing skai, midfielder and fullback round of the NCAA tourna- Harvard’s advantage heading Carlotta von Gierke, midment, however, Princeton into the final 15 minutes of fielder Krista Hoffman, and exacted revenge, winning 2–1 play. striker Taylor Nolan. They to reach the national semiIn the fourth, Princeton have registered 50 wins, finals. The two teams have wasted no time sealing the three NCAA tournament apMICHAEL REEVES / COURTESY OF GOPRINCETONTIGERS.COM Sammy Popper ‘23 hits the ball during the team’s match against combined to win each of the deal. Two minutes had barely pearances, two Final Fours, Harvard last Saturday. last seven Ivy titles. ticked away as Popper fired and an Ivy League title.

This fall’s edition of Princ- another shot from the right On the field, Princeton eton versus Harvard, played that was rebounded and con- dominated Cornell, earning more striker Ali McCarthy, The Tigers’ victory over the at the beginning of break in verted by junior midfielder a 3–0 win. The Tigers scored who took advantage of a 3v1 Big Red also guarantees them Boston, lived up to the hype. MaryKate Neff. The Tigers just four minutes into the situation to put Princeton at least a share of the league’s In the first quarter, the Ti- would only allow one shot action as Popper converted ahead 2–0. Junior midfielder regular season title and an gers’ defense did not allow on goal in the final 13 min- a corner. At halftime, Princ- Julianna Tornetta added a automatic NCAA Tournaa single shot. The Crimson utes, coming away with a 3–2 eton held a 7–1 shot advan- third tally for the Tigers on a ment berth. Princeton will fought back in the second victory. tage. penalty stroke in the fourth. be back in action Saturday period, converting the first With the win, the Tigers In the third quarter, junior Princeton is now unde- at Penn. tally of the game in its 24th moved to 5–0 against Ivy op- striker Emma Street forced a feated in the Ivy League with minute. But with just 49 sec- ponents and into control of turnover, then found sopho- only one game remaining.

Senior Staff Writer

WOMEN’S VOLLEYBALL

Women’s volleyball extends win streak to seven

By Alissa Selover Associate Sports Editor

Princeton women’s volleyball (13–6 overall, 9–1 Ivy League) went 2–0 this weekend against Cornell (15–4 overall, 8–2 Ivy) and Columbia (11–9 overall, 4–6 Ivy), extending their win streak to 7 matches.

The weekend started in Ithaca, NY in a battle of the first-place Ivy League teams, where Princeton came out on top 3–2 (19–25, 22–25, 25–21, 25–21, 15–12). Princeton started off the match against the Big Red by dropping the first two sets and initially allowed Cornell to go on a quick 3–0 run in the third set. This didn’t stop the momentum on the court for the Tigers, though. Princeton rallied back to go on a 7–0 run.

The Tigers kept their lead until a Cornell block tied the set at 16-all and a Tiger attack error gave Cornell the lead. A kill from junior Clare Lenihan put the Tigers up 19–18, and they didn’t give up the lead again in the 25–21 victory.

The Tigers started the fourth

BEVERLY SCHAEFER / COURTESY OF GOPRINCETONTIGERS.COM

The team celebrates during their match against Columbia on Saturday. set off strong with an early 3–0 lead before the Big Red got a point on the board. During the entire fourth set, the Tigers never let Cornell take the lead. Princeton also started the fifth set with a quick 2–0 lead, eventually ex-

tending that lead to 5–3 before the Big Red went on a 6-point run to propel up 5–9. Trailing by four points, a large kill from freshman Olivia Schewe started a 7–0 run from the Tigers that pushed the Tigers in front of Cornell with

a lead that they never lost in their 15–12 victory.

Senior Maggie O’Connell had a special night as she recorded her 1000th career kill. Totaling in 13 during the match. Lenihan also contributed 13 kills while senior Jessie Harris led the offense with 58 assists and sophomore Cameron Dames recorded 32 digs.

The match against Columbia was another exciting night for the Tigers as they defeated the Lions 3–1 (25–21, 25–17, 23–25, 28–26) and senior Devon Peterkin had a career-high 19 kills.

The first set started with a Princeton 5–0 run and despite the fight put in from the Lions, they never gained the lead during the entire set. The second set started out much closer than the first, generating three ties until the Tigers went on a four-point run to get them the 8–4 advantage. The score was tied once more at 11-all, but the Tigers didn’t let the Lions score more than six more points in their 25–17 win.

Set three didn’t end as victorious for the Tigers. Columbia took

their first lead at 2–3, but the Tigers would take it back and stay ahead until a Lion kill tied the score at a close 22-all and another kill put them ahead by one point.

A Princeton kill by O’Connell tied the score once more at 23-all, but the Tigers couldn’t stop Columbia from forcing off a kill and a block to tally the final two points of the set.

Columbia stayed resilient in the fourth set, forcing the score to be tied 17 times. Columbia had set-point at 25–24, but two errors placed the Tigers back into the race. At a 26-all tie, senior Natasha Skov would push the Tigers to match-point at 27–26, and a Columbia attacking error gave Princeton the victory.

Skov had 17 kills during the match, just two behind Peterkin, who also had 10 digs. Harris had 52 assists and 10 digs, while Dames added 12 digs.

Princeton’s next match will be on Friday, Oct. 8 against Dartmouth in Dillon Gymnasium.

The match will start at 7 p.m.

WOMEN’S SOCCER

Seniors pull through as Princeton defeats Cornell 2-0

By Sreesha Ghosh Contributor

Princeton’s Senior Day saw women’s soccer (7–6–3, 2–3–1 Ivy League) emerge victorious in their tussle against Cornell (4–9–1, 0–6–0 Ivy) 2–0, securing their second Ivy League win of the season.

Senior forward Courtney O’Brien spared absolutely no time in ensuring her last game at Princeton would be a victorious one. At less than a minute into the game, she converted a throw-in from freshman defender Madison Curry into a rocket that she fired into the net from 25 yards away, scoring the first goal of the game and her fifth of the season. Less than 20 minutes later, senior forward Abby Givens headed a

corner kick from senior midfielder Sophia Gulati into the net, pushing the Tigers ahead 2–0.

Both teams amped up the aggression in the second half: Cornell’s goalie Chrissy Mayor saved three separate shots from freshman forward Grace Sherman, junior defender Eve Hewins and sophomore forward Amy Paternoster in under four minutes. Cornell attempted 11 shots in the second half, but thanks to a combined shutout from senior goalkeepers Kelli Calhoun and Natalie Grossi, and the rest of the Tiger defense, none materialized into a goal.

All in all, the Tigers outshot the Big Red 26–15. Both sides fouled nine times, and one yellow card was awarded

to Cornell. The victory continues Princeton’s winning streak against Cornell to a 24th game since the latter’s last win in 1995 and leaves the Tigers 5th from the top on the Ivy League standings.

Head coach Sean Driscoll recognized the senior contribution, commenting that “the most important thing about the day was to give the senior class, who have been so instrumental in our success in the past four years, a really good sendoff. It was a great way to end their season at home and a truly positive way to celebrate their careers.”

The team will face off against Penn this Saturday in their last Ivy League match of the season.

PHOTO CREDIT: JACK GRAHAM / THE DAILY PRINCETONIAN

Olivia Kane ‘21 and Princeton beat Cornell on Saturday.

Tweet of the Day

Stat of the Day

Follow us

The start of a pretty big week as the celebration of #CFB150 culminates in Saturday’s battle of unbeatens with the Tigers and Dartmouth at Yankee Stadium! #MakeHi2t0ry

0

Check us out on Twitter @princesports for live news and reports, and on Instagram @princetoniansports for photos!

Princeton Tigers (@PUTIGERS)

There are zero days until women’s basketball starts their season -- they take on Rider tonight in Jadwin Gym