December 6, 2018

Founded 1876 daily since 1892 online since 1998

Wednesday December 5, 2018 vol. CXLII no. 112

Twitter: @princetonian Facebook: The Daily Princetonian YouTube: The Daily Princetonian Instagram: @dailyprincetonian

{ www.dailyprincetonian.com }

ON CAMPUS

Public Safety plants bait bikes on campus

By Benjamin Ball Senior Writer

The Department of Public Safety has placed bait bikes around campus to catch bike thieves in the act and deter bike theft on campus.

These bait bikes are locked bicycles equipped with GPS tracking devices. If a bike is taken, Public Safety can track its location and the person in possession of the bike.

As part of the Bait Bikes Program, Public Safety will provide registered bike riders with stickers that say “This Could Be a Bait Bike: Think Before You Steal” so potential thieves will not know which bikes are being tracked.

In order to obtain a bait bike sticker, students, faculty, and staff must first register their bikes with Transportation and Parking Services. Registration is free.

Executive Director of Public Safety Paul Ominsky told the Office of Communications that bike theft is one of the most common crimes on college campuses, and that bikes are the most commonly stolen item at the University.

Ben Parker ’20, a bike owner himself, believed that the program could be successful because it forces potential bike thieves to think twice before stealing.

“People are less likely to commit a crime when the likelihood of being caught gets higher,” Parker said.

“A bike potentially being

ZEYTUN WEST :: PRINCETONIAN STAFF PHOTOGRAPHER

Public Safety has placed bait bikes around campus and will provide registered bike riders with stickers that say “This Could Be a Bait Bike: Think Before You Steal.”

tagged would do that for sure.”

However, Parker had some hesitations about the actual logistics of the program, saying that the program felt like an “icky … entrapment.”

Kate O’Brien ’19 had her bike stolen last December.

She had gone to MurrayDodge Hall for cookies for about an hour and left her bike outside with the lock on but not secured. When she

left Murray-Dodge, her bike was no longer there.

“I had my bike since freshman year, and it was my baby,” O’Brien said. “I don’t walk anywhere. I was very upset.”

O’Brien noted that, ironically, she had been writing a paper for her journalism class on bike theft when her bike was stolen.

O’Brien used her Snapchat story, Instagram, and

ON CAMPUS

the Butler Buzz listserv to spread the word to her peers about her missing bike.

“I had this whole movement going on,” O’Brien said.

She found her bike a few days later outside of the second f loor entrance to the Frist Campus Center and has securely locked her bike ever since. She expressed optimism towards Public Safety’s bait bike system,

though she lamented its necessity.

“I think it’s worth a shot,” O’Brien said. “It’s kind of sad that we have to do that.

So many of my friends have had their bikes stolen, and many haven’t found them.”

More recently, about a week ago, Sophie Evans ’21 had her bike stolen outside East Pyne Hall. She has yet to find it or have it returned, although she noted that she did not have her bike registered with Public Safety.

“I had hoped someone was taking it to get somewhere in the rain, and I would get it back after, but it was to avail,” Evans said.

Should the bait bike system be effective, Evans said she would be interested to see where the stolen bikes end up.

“I’d be interested to see if the bikes stay on campus, by the boathouse, or if they [appear] in bike shops across New Jersey,” Evans said.

Corporal Martin Krzywicki and Sergeant Sean Ryder are leading the Bait Bike Program. Krzywicki was unavailable for comment at the time of this publication, while Ryder deferred to the Office of Communications and Deputy University Spokesperson Michael Hotchkiss.

Members of Public Safety will be answering further questions from students on the Bait Bike Program at the “Coffee with a Cop” event from 8 to 11 a.m. Monday, Dec. 10, at Frist Campus Center.

STUDENT LIFE

Faculty members Burdine, Weber Paid sick leave for student workers starts in February named 2018 science fellows Senior Writer

PHOTOS COURTESY OF OFFICE OF COMMUNICATIONS AND JESSICA BAL

Burdine (l.) used zebrafish to study genes involved in human diseases. Weber explained the decisions that people make are the “perfect storm” for applying cognitive psychology.

By Nick Shashkini Staff Writer

Princeton University faculty members Rebecca Burdine and Elke Weber have been named the 2018 fellows of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). They will be honored on Feb. 16 at the 2019 AAAS Annual Meeting in Washington, D.C. The AAAS, an U.S. international non-profit organization and the world’s largest general scientific society, has over 120,000

In Opinion

members and is the publisher of the scientific journal “Science.”

Rebecca Burdine, an associate professor of molecular biology, was recognized for her work in the field of developmental genetics. She used zebrafish to study the genes involved in human diseases and processes such as heart development and the causes of idiopathic scoliosis.

Zebrafish are used in modeling human disease since 70 percent of human genes are also found in ze-

Contributing columnist Ethan Li encourages students to look beyond difficulty when selecting courses and guest contributor Will Crawford pushes back against columnist Avner Goldstein’s criticism of the bonfire.

PAGE 4

brafish. In addition, they have similar organ pathways, helping to model the progression of human diseases that affect how organs function.

Burdine expects to continue her research in the near future and emphasizes the importance of students in her work.

“A lot of the accomplishments that I get to take credit for are actually done by the students in the lab,” Burdine said. “We all move science forward as a group, See FELLOWS page 3

Today on Campus

Starting next February, students working on campus will be able to earn paid sick leave under the New Jersey Paid Sick Leave Act. The act stipulated that employees must be notified of the new policy by Nov. 29.

On Nov. 21, the University emailed students working hourly jobs on campus informing them that they will start accruing paid sick leave at a rate of one paid hour of leave every 30 hours worked.

“By providing compensated sick time, the new paid sick leave policy should provide additional flexibility for hourly student employees,” explained University spokesperson Ben Chang.

The New Jersey Paid Sick Leave Act was adopted by the 218th New Jersey State Legislature on March 12, 2018. The act was sponsored by Assemblywoman Pamela R. Lampitt (District 6), Assemblyman Raj Mukherji (District 33), Assemblyman Jerry Green (District 22), Assemblyman Benjie E. Wimberly (District 35), Assemblywoman Shavonda E. Sumter (District 35), and Assemblyman Paul D. Moriarty (District 4).

However, few University students will claim much paid sick leave since most students work part-time jobs with hours that are unlikely

12:15 p.m.: A discussion about net neutrality, 5G policy, and financial considerations with Federal Communications Commissioner Jessica Rosenworcel and Nick Feamster, professor of computer science.

Robertson 016

to accumulate to an amount sufficient for paid leave.

“Even though I don’t think I personally will use [the new policy], and I haven’t had a situation where that has come up, I think that it’s a very useful and important rule,” Isaac Wolfe ’20 said.

Wolfe explained that this new rule could be crucial for other students who rely a lot more on campus jobs for dayto-day expenses.

For Krystal Delnoce, ‘21, who said she is first-generation low-income (FLI) student who works at Dillon Gymnasium as a children’s swim instructor and at Murray-Dodge cafe, the rule may come in handy. She said that she has previously found it difficult to take time off from her jobs when she was ill.

“I teach swim lessons, and I’ll be the only instructor teaching three or four kids, so if I don’t show up, who teaches them?” Delnoce said.

She explained that she became suddenly ill last semester and received little sympathy from her supervisors when trying to find someone to cover her shifts.

“You would get into trouble if you don’t find somebody to cover your shifts,” Delnoce said. “You sometimes have to push through and it’s not always good for the safety of everyone involved.”

However, Delnoce worried See SICK LEAVE page 2

WEATHER

By Rose Gilbert

HIGH

36˚

LOW

23˚

Mostly cloudy chance of rain:

0 percent

page 2

The Daily Princetonian

Wednesday December 5, 2018

Wolfe: It’s a very useful and important rule

COURTESY OF ALIISA LEE ‘16

Chang said that providing compensated sick time should give hourly student employees additional flexibility.

SICK LEAVE Continued from page 1

.............

that she might face repercussions for taking advantage of any paid sick leave she might accumulate, especially when it comes to promotions.

“If I take paid sick leave and … somebody has to scramble [to fill in for me], will that negatively impact me even though I was well within

my rights to take that sick leave?” she wondered.

These worries are addressed by the New Jersey Notice of Employee Rights: Employers cannot retaliate against employees for requesting or using earned sick leave. Retaliation includes reduced hours, demotion, or suspension.

Wolfe added, “I’m thankful for whoever instituted [this policy].”

The best place to

Write Edit Opine Design T HE DA ILY Produce Illustrate Photograph Create

on campus.

join@dailyprincetonian.com

Wednesday December 5, 2018

Burdine: I get credit for students’ accomplishments FELLOWS Continued from page 1

.............

so it’s important that they get their recognition.”

Elke Weber, the Gerhard R. Andlinger Professor in Energy and the Environment and a professor of psychology and public affairs, was recognized for her 30-year-long research on humans’ ability to make decisions under risk and uncertainty, as well practical applications of this research to real world problems like climate change.

Weber explained the decisions that people make with respect to their environments are the “perfect storm” for applying cognitive psychology, since wise decisions must be made under obstacles like a time crunch.

These climate change decisions are further complicated by prob-

The Daily Princetonian

lems of collective action.

“Benefits don’t necessarily accrue to you or your future self,” Weber said. “It’s for future generations in far away places, so I figured that if we can solve these kinds of issues [in cognitive psychology], then everything else is the icing on the cake.”

Prior to coming to Princeton, Weber was a professor at Columbia Business School. She moved to Princeton two-and-a-half years ago because she wanted to do research more focused on public policy.

“I know human nature and myself well enough to know that it’s easier to do new things in new places, while in old places you have your habits,” Weber explained.

Both professors expect to continue their current projects, but neither can share specifics of their work until their projects conclude.

Personality Survey:

1) During lecture you are... a) asking the professor questions. b) doodling all over your notes. c) correcting grammar mistakes. d) watching videos on youtube.com e) calculating the opportunity cost of sitting in lecture.

2) Your favorite hidden pasttime is... a) getting the scoop on your roommate’s relationships. b) stalking people’s Facebook pictures c) finding dangling modifiers in your readings d) managing your blog. e) lurking outside 48 University Place 3) The first thing that you noticed was... a) the word “survey.” b) the logo set in the background. c) the extra “t” in “pasttime.” d) the o’s and i’s that look like binary code from far away. e) the fact that this is a super-cool ad for The Daily Princetonian.

If you answered mostly “a,” you are a reporter in the making!

If you answered mostly “b,” you are a design connoisseur, with unlimited photography talents!

If you answered mostly “c,” you are anal enough to be a copy editor!

If you answered mostly “d,” you are a multimedia and web designing whiz!

And if you answered mostly “e,” you are obsessed with the ‘Prince’ and should come join the Editorial Board and Business staff!

Contact join@dailyprincetonian.com!

page 3

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

The Daily Princetonian is published daily except Saturday and Sunday from September through May and three times a week during January and May by The Daily Princetonian Publishing Company, Inc., 48 University Place, Princeton, N.J. 08540. Mailing address: P.O. Box 469, Princeton, N.J. 08542. Subscription rates: Mailed in the United States $175.00 per year, $90.00 per semester. Office hours: Sunday through Friday, 1:30 p.m. to 4:30 p.m. Telephones: Business: 609-375-8553; News and Editorial: 609-258-3632. For tips, email news@dailyprincetonian. com. Reproduction of any material in this newspaper without expressed permission of The Daily Princetonian Publishing Company, Inc., is strictly prohibited. Copyright 2014, The Daily Princetonian Publishing Company, Inc. POSTMASTER: Send address changes to The Daily Princetonian, P.O. Box 469, Princeton, N.J. 08542.

Opinion

Wednesday December 5, 2018

page 4

{ www.dailyprincetonian.com }

Ethan Li

Don’t let your fear of failure dictate your course selections

Contributing Columnist

D

on’t let the fear

of failure dictate your course selections.

Spring course selection is upon us. As we plan out our second semester schedules, I’ve noticed a prevalent phenomenon: Students value the difficulty (or lack thereof) of a potential class more than their actual interest in the class.

This allows the fear of failure to dictate their academic experience.

I know friends who choose easy courses, knowing full well that these classes will be intellectually uninspiring, avoiding more difficult ones for fear of receiving low marks or immoderate amounts of work. I know classmates who elect to drop into lower-level math classes because of one poor exam grade.

Almost unconsciously, students develop a fear of failure.

We prioritize a class’s “easiness” over its pedagogical worth, limiting our own capabilities.

I know people who forget the inquisitiveness they initially brought to college. The fear of failure is the exact antithesis of collegiate spirit. College is the perfect place to fail, as it is perhaps the last time we are able to try new things without consequence.

“Fail” doesn’t have to mean

a literal failing grade. Instead, “fail” means performing worse than your own expectations; failure is inherently idiosyncratic.

Academic exploration’s main benefit is that you could discover something you truly love. An estimated 75 percent of students end up choosing a major different from what they intended upon entering college. That means that — especially for freshmen — you may not have found your passion yet. Additionally (for all the non-freshmen), even after declaring a major, approximately one third of undergraduate students changed their choice again before graduating.

Moreover, even if you are unequivocally certain of your major, you may still discover secondary passions in the form of certificates. Certificate requirements sometimes overlap with each other, so you may have already taken some of the necessary courses. In either case, the merits of exploration are abundantly clear.

You never know; a class you take out of genuine curiosity may be your true passion. The reward of finding something you are passionate about is far greater than the risk of losing a few GPA points.

Nonetheless, despite my patronage of academic exploration, I recognize there are some practical issues. Some students may

contend that college is in fact not the “perfect place to fail,” especially when it comes to specific programs that demand a high GPA. Students on the premedical track, for example, often cannot afford to entertain uncertainties concerning their grades. This is a failure of the status quo.

Unfortunately, sometimes the college environment itself facilitates a fear of failure, uncharacteristically discouraging ingenuity. For students pursuing intrinsically GPA-stringent programs, the line between exploration and stability is harder to balance. There is no easy solution. In many regards, it is a systemic failure that those programs demand rigid GPAs. Regardless, the idea of failure-averse decision making is a well-documented phenomenon. Behavioral psychologists have studied the rationale behind risk avoidance for decades.

Former UC Berkeley professor Martin Covington proposed the PAW model. Our Performance in a task is linked to our Ability, which in turn reflects our selfWorth.

Performance = Ability = Worth Thus, Covington argued that we subconsciously choose tasks we are confident we can complete, in order to protect our fragile egos. However, the price of self-esteem protection is steep. It results in less efficient learning.

We learn fastest when we fail, and we fail most when we are challenged. Consequently, we learn fastest while being challenged. This concept sounds (and is) conspicuously transparent, but our actions frequently do not reflect it.

Everyone has a unique threshold by which they define failure, but often we set the bar too low.

We underestimate our own abilities, and thus we scare ourselves away from testing our true potential. Even as a freshman, I already find myself succumbing to these types of thoughts: “What is the easiest SA class I can take?”

“Which writing seminar has the least amount of writing?”

As with most things in life, the trick is to find some semblance of balance. That balance manifests itself differently for different people. Typically, however, we err on the side of caution — most people are risk-averse, as University psychologist Daniel Kahneman found in his research.

In finding a happy medium, it is enough to be cognizant of people’s natural “play-it-safe” mentality. Simply by being aware of this bias, you can (and should) prioritize your intellectual discovery more than you fear the possibility of failure.

Ethan Li is a first-year from Stony Brook, N.Y. He can be reached at ethanl@princeton.edu.

Guest Contributor

T

he tradition of holding a bonfire

to celebrate our victory over Harvard and Yale in football is a beautiful custom rooted in our University experience and common experiences at most colleges in the United States. I say our victory over Harvard and Yale because football games — the game itself, the excitement, and the spirit surrounding it — bring students, faculty, administrators, and alumni together. We all get to share in the football team’s most public display of their talent and discipline. Avner Goldstein’s opinion piece lobs wrongheaded ideological attacks against this muchloved celebration and recklessly smears the football players in the process.

Look around at schools across the country of all sizes and missions, and you will see that almost without exception, football is a public social experience that brings the entire community together around a common cause, an important feature of a school’s character in a way that no other sport is. That’s why we began celebrating this victory against our rivals so ostentatiously, and that’s why we still do. We should continue to celebrate it in exactly that unique way.

We don’t uphold traditions blindly just because

they’ve been around for a long time. We continue them because we understand that traditions often remain for good reasons — reasons that we still accept today as we join a long line of observance that extends back decades or longer. We respect the enduring goodness in them. To judge every custom passed down to us by some hyperrationality is the arrogance of the present, and to judge them by radical ideological standards is often even more dangerous, as it is here.

Certainly, the past is rife with examples of evil, contemptible practices that we can and should end immediately where they persist.

Goldstein claims that “for our campus community, the only item worthy of deeply rooted tradition seems to be a celebration of men in a sport that not only excludes women but historically has celebrated whiteness and continues to entertain racism.” But nobody actually looks at this celebration of two big wins for the football team that way. On its face, the argument that the bonfire is the product of oppressive masculinity is wrong.

No other team, whether men’s or women’s, receives this kind of special ceremony. The other men’s teams are just as excluded as the women’s teams are. The motivation, then, is not animus for women or their athletic programs.

The more compelling contention is that other teams

deserve more equitable public recognition for their impressive performances. When I’m at DeNunzio Pool or Dillon Gymnasium, I’m proud of our athletes’ achievements hanging from banners on the walls that represent our long history of athletic excellence. It is rightly a point of great pride.

That’s why I support efforts to celebrate the outstanding athletes at the University, of which we have many. In fact, I hear and share many wishes that the students at this University would pay more attention to the athletic community and that more publicity and appreciation for them, their hard work, their competitions, and their victories would be afforded them.

Yet, despite this, the bonfire should remain unique to this particular football tradition, and most students would welcome, as I would, many more new traditions to commemorate any and all of the other teams’ successes, rather than eroding this one. I don’t think Goldstein would oppose new commemorative traditions, but I disagree with him that the bonfire should be open to other teams.

The claim that football is an inherently racist sport seems to me the most absurd claim. People of all races play, coach, watch, and love football. According to the NCAA, last year over 47 percent of Division I FCS players were black with less than 40 percent white

in the same category. Over 20 percent of head coaches in the same category were black. I will not delve into the claims concerning the consequences some professional athletes have faced for their public political beliefs on matters of race relations in the United States, but even if the worst possible interpretations of their censures are true, that proves nothing about the racist nature of the sport itself, if that’s even possible. If anything, the football team is one of the most inclusive, most diverse institutions we have at the University.

This criticism lodged against the bonfire asserts not only that football is racist and misogynist, but also that the men on the Princeton team are agents of such an incorrigible system. This is horrible and untrue, and it attacks the entire team’s character for doing nothing more than being deservedly celebrated for their achievements.

Keep the bonfire for football. Celebrate all the athletes in your clubs, classes, and dorms. Make new traditions, share them, and keep them. And when we find things that bring us all together for wholly good reasons as the bonfire does, cherish them, because they don’t come around very often.

Will Crawford is a junior history concentrator from Rome, Ga. He can be reached at wwc@princeton.edu.

Request for Pyne Prize nominations Kathleen Deignan

Guest Contributor

Office of the Dean of Undergraduate Students 313 Morrison Hall Princeton, New Jersey 08544 From: Kathleen Deignan Date: Dec. 3, 2018 __________________________

I write to solicit nominations for the Pyne Prize, the highest general distinction the University confers upon an undergraduate, which will be awarded on Alumni Day, Saturday, Feb. 23, 2019.

In thinking about student nominations, I would ask that you consider the following description: M. Taylor Pyne Honor Prize: A prize awarded annually to

the senior who has manifested in outstanding fashion the following qualifications: excellence in scholarship, character, and effective support of the best interests of Princeton University. Founded in 1921 in remembrance of the life and character of M. Taylor Pyne, Class of 1877, Trustee of Princeton 1885–1921, by his cousin, Mrs. May Taylor Moulton Hanrahan, the prize is the

editor-in-chief

Marcia Brown ’19 business manager

Ryan Gizzie ’19

BOARD OF TRUSTEES president Thomas E. Weber ’89 vice president Craig Bloom ’88 secretary Betsy L. Minkin ’77 treasurer Douglas J. Widmann ’90 trustees Francesca Barber David Baumgarten ’06 Kathleen Crown Gabriel Debenedetti ’12 Stephen Fuzesi ’00 Zachary A. Goldfarb ’05 Michael Grabell ’03 John Horan ’74 Joshua Katz Rick Klein ’98 James T. MacGregor ’66 Alexia Quadrani Marcelo Rochabrun ’15 Kavita Saini ’09 Richard W. Thaler, Jr. ’73 Abigail Williams ’14 trustees emeriti Gregory L. Diskant ’70 William R. Elfers ’71 Kathleen Kiely ’77 Jerry Raymond ’73 Michael E. Seger ’71 Annalyn Swan ’73 trustees ex officio Marcia Brown ’19 Ryan Gizzie ’19

In defense of the bonfire Will Crawford

vol. cxlii

highest general distinction the University confers upon an undergraduate. The prize consists of the income from this fund up to the prevailing comprehensive fee for one academic year.

We are eager to receive letters of nomination from members of the University community.

Please send letters to pyneprize@princeton.edu by Monday, Jan. 7, 2019.

142ND MANAGING BOARD managing editors Isabel Hsu ’19 Sam Parsons ’19 head news editor Claire Thornton ’19 associate news editors Allie Spensley ’20 Ariel Chen ’20 Ivy Truong ’21 associate news and film editor Sarah Warman Hirschfield ’20 head opinion editor Emily Erdos ’19 associate opinion editors Jon Ort ’21 Cy Watsky ’21 head sports editors David Xin ’19 Chris Murphy ’20 associate sports editors Miranda Hasty ’19 Jack Graham ’20 associate street editors Danielle Hoffman ’20 Lyric Perot ’20 digital operations manager Sarah Bowen ’20 chief copy editors Marina Latif ’19 Arthur Mateos ’19 Catherine Benedict ’20 head design editor Rachel Brill ’19 associate design editor Charlotte Adamo ’21 cartoons editor Tashi Treadway ’19 head photo editor Risa Gelles-Watnick ’21

NIGHT STAFF copy Kaitlyn Bolin ’21 Seoyoung Hong ’21 Isabel Segel ’22 Catherine Yu ’21 design Ava Jiang ’21 Quinn Donohue ’20

Opinion

Wednesday December 5, 2018

page 5

{ www.dailyprincetonian.com }

Response to ‘Elections without consequence’ Brad Spicher

Guest Contributor

L

ate last night, The Daily Princetonian

Editorial Board released an editorial in which it broke with tradition and decided not to endorse any specific candidate in the Undergraduate Student Government presidential election. By citing the relative similarity of the candidates’ platforms and the number of uncontested elections, the Board argues that this year’s USG winter elections are “without consequence.”

While I think the Board raises legitimate concerns about the lack of policy-related discourse publicly available during this election cycle, I cannot fully support the notion that these elections are inconsequential, or lacking in valid policy disagreements. As a USG class senator and the unopposed candidate for USG treasurer, I see important differences not only in the presidential platforms, but also in the prior

experiences and motivations that each candidate would bring to office.

First, I would like to respond to the notion that the three candidates’ each running with solid, well-developed platforms makes the election inconsequential. I believe that having three presidential candidates with “beneficial” ideas is rather a strength for the election as a whole. Instead of arguing over website domains and late meal debates, the 2018 candidates have publicized different platforms, each with a completely unique focus. While the major goal of Electra Frelinghuysen ’20 as USG president would be to improve Career Services and the recruiting process, Zarnab Virk ’20 focuses on being a champion for independent students and people of color, and Nate Lambert ’20 offers a platform centered around preventing sexual misconduct, providing free menstrual products, and combating campus isolation. Many of these issues overlap within the three platforms;

however, they each clearly define what the candidate’s major goals will be as president, and these goals are the ones most likely to be achieved in office.

That being said, there are also substantive disagreements that the candidates have with one another. For example, one of Virk’s campaign goals is to establish a credit program with Uber or Lyft to give students credits to get free rides to stores and restaurants in the Princeton area — a program similar to one already in place at Johns Hopkins University. On the contrary, at the presidential debate (where I was one of the 15 people present), Lambert disagreed with Virk’s plan, arguing that USG should not partner with a private company, and instead suggested that the Saturday and Sunday Shopper should have extended times and drop-off locations to better support independent students.

On the issue of first-year advising, Lambert and Virk fundamentally disagree. Virk pushes

When I’m getting food vs. When I see the bill Vincent Deluca ’22 ..................................................

for advisors in the area of study of first-year students, while Lambert argues against this, stating that the administration should “keep advising randomized.”

Another important difference between the candidates is the level of experience that they would bring to office. Understanding the bureaucracy of USG and utilizing opportunities to leverage the administration is the core skill that gives the president influence. Each candidate has a varying level of exposure to USG, and in such a complex organization, experience matters.

Voting in the USG elections is critical because it directly affects the priorities of the incoming administration. For example, this year’s president, Rachel Yee ’19, prioritized mental health initiatives as the top issue for USG and was able to establish Counseling and Psychological Services satellite offices and acquire better mental health resources and training. The president we choose will determine the priority of dif-

ferent issues, broker deals with the administration, and set the tone of the USG senate for the upcoming year. USG needs the student body’s input on what issues should be at the top of the list in meetings with administrators, and we can only get that input when we vote.

While the candidates do overlap on many issues, there is still room to critically interact with their platforms. I believe that the ‘Prince’ Editorial Board is remiss in choosing to not take a stance on these issues, even if they choose not to endorse a candidate. It is still of incredible importance for the student body to vote in this year’s USG presidential election.

Brad Spicher is a junior from Garden City, N.Y., and a photographer for the ‘Prince.’ He is an economics major and sitting class senator on USG. His commentary is his own, and does not constitute an official statement from the USG senate. He can be contacted at bspicher@princeton.edu.

Intern Fishing

Jonathan Zhi ’21

..................................................

Hiya, Edmund!: Holiday Gifts Chris huh ’21

..................................................

Wednesday December 5, 2018

Sports

page 6

{ www.dailyprincetonian.com } WOMEN’S BASKETBALL

Women’s basketball captures second win of the season against Davidson

By Alissa Selover Staff Writer

Sunday, the Princeton women’s basketball team (2– 7) gained its second win this season as the Tigers played Davidson (4–4) at home in Jadwin Gymnasium. Coming off of a six-game losing streak, the Tigers were motivated to get the win this weekend.

Throughout the game, the score was continuously back and forth. Fans were biting their nails as the score was 27–24 Princeton at the end of the first half. The end of the third quarter gave Davidson a one-point lead, 45–44, its first lead of the second half.

The Tigers started to chip their lead away as sophomore Carlie Littlefield made back-to-back free throws to put the score at 53–51 near the end of the fourth quarter.

During the game, Littlefield had 22 points, eight rebounds, three assists and two steals. Littlefield had been named Ivy League Player of the Week last week.

Seniors Gabrielle Rush and Sydney Jordan both had double-digit points to help the offense, with Rush scoring 12 and Jordan scoring 14.

Sophomore Sydney Boyer had seven points to contribute to the scoreboard.

Littlefield explained that the Tigers set out with the goal of winning the Ivy League tournament. “We

have been working toward this goal by being committed to getting better each day and establishing the expectation of hard work as part of our team culture,” she said.

As predominantly young team, the Tigers have been struggling with lack of overall experience. Despite that, Littlefield explained that they “have learned a lot about being the tougher team and controlling the things that can be controlled, like rebounding.” These factors become even more important when the score isn’t in favor of the Tigers.

Davidson came into the game with a 42.1 rebound percentage while the Tigers trailed at 34.4. Knowing that they could control the game if they could control the rebounds, this lesson became crucial in the game. Rush led the team with 10 total rebounds, which is one-third of the 30 rebounds by the team on Sunday afternoon.

Boyer also had a personal high of eight rebounds in the win.

Davidson is also one of the top teams in the NCAA for defense around the threepoint line, so consistency became key for the Tigers.

Overall, the women made a total of seven out of 17 threepoint attempts.

After losing six games in a row, the Tigers showed their strength against Davidson.

Littlefield noted that their

COURTESY OF GOPRINCETONTIGERS.COM

Carlie Littlefield matched a career-best with 22 points against Davidson.

losing streak motivated them to get better by showing them exactly what they need to improve.

Looking into the near future and the goal of winning

the Ivy League championship, the women are improving in every way they can.

Littlefield commented on this by saying, “Our team dynamic is more eager and

energetic to learn and get better.”

Princeton will play the Quinnipiac Bobcats this Saturday, Dec. 8, at 7 p.m. in Jadwin Gym.

WOMEN’S SQUASH

Women’s squash stays undefeated with sweeps over Amherst, Williams

By Vignesh Panchanathan Contributor

The No. 3 Princeton women’s squash team (5–0) swept No. 16 Amherst and No. 13 Williams on Friday and Saturday, respectively.

The Princeton women did not drop a game against Williams. Senior Camille Price only lost eight points at the No. 9 position en route to her 3–0 victory in her season debut.

Against Amherst, Princeton only gave up two games. Sophomore Grace Doyle played well at the No. 1 position, only dropping 13 points, and fellow sophomore Emme Leonard won 9–3, 9–6, 9–3 at the No. 2 spot.

The Tigers opened their season with five straight victories including sweeps against Virginia and George Washington and a 7–2 defeat of then-No. 4 Stanford.

“We were gearing the fall for Stanford. It was the second weekend of competition, our second match, so we were a little bit anxious and nervous, but overall we prepared well,” said head coach Gail Ramsay. “[The freshmen] stepped up and got their games going

against some pretty tough opponents.”

The Princeton women welcomed freshmen Bubble Lui, Elle Ruggiero, Andrea Toth, and Emily Rose to the team this year. Coming in at the top of Hong Kong junior rankings at the U19 level, Lui currently holds the No. 1 position on the team, taking over for graduated AllAmerican Olivia Fiechter.

Ruggiero, the secondranked U.S. U19 women’s player, and Toth, the top Canadian U19 women’s player, also cracked the starting roster, at No. 4 and 8 respectively. Rose, the sixthranked U.S. U19 women’s player, sits just outside at No. 10.

Ramsay touts the depth of the team as a strength.

“Toth at No. 8 is No. 1 from Canada. The No. 1 from any country has a certain level of clout,” said Ramsay. “We are strong at the top, but ultimately I think numbers five, six, seven, eight, nine will be a real important part of the lineup. If we are going to make some big wins and upset a couple people, I think those five will need to produce some W’s on a consistent basis.”

After winter break, the

Tweet of the Day “Congrats Rachel McQuigge on being named the ECAC Hockey Goalie of the Month after an undefeated November!”

Princeton Hockey (@PWIH)

COURTESY OF GOPRINCETONTIGERS.COM

Isabel Hirshberg helped lead women’s squash to consecutive 9–0 wins this weekend.

Tigers will travel to No. 2 Trinity before playing seven straight Ivy League matches. Ramsay pointed out No. 4 Penn and No. 1 Harvard as particularly challenging matches.

Last year, Princeton went

Subscribe to our newsletter The Daily Princetonian has a new newsletter.

Check it out, and subscribe here: eepurl.com/GveCn

15–2 overall, 6–1 Ivy League, only losing in the Ivy League to league champion Harvard.

“Harvard has been somewhat dominant in the league right now,” said Ramsay. “So, we have to work

on playing our best squash ever on that date which is a reasonable goal.”

The Tigers take on No. 9 Drexel tomorrow night at Jadwin Gymnasium and then have a month off before their next match.

Follow us Check us out on Twitter @princesports for live news and reports, and on Instagram @princetoniansports for photos!