The Daily Princetonian: October 3, 2019 by The Daily Princetonian

Founded 1876 daily since 1892 online since 1998

Thursday October 3, 2019 vol. CXLIII no. 81

Twitter: @princetonian Facebook: The Daily Princetonian YouTube: The Daily Princetonian Instagram: @dailyprincetonian

ON CAMPUS

{ www.dailyprincetonian.com }

Former Obama, Clinton pollster Joel Benenson talks campaign strategy, interpreting polling data By Evelyn Doskoch Contributor

EVELYN DOSKOCH / THE DAILY PRINCETONIAN

Pollster Joel Benenson (left) and Professor of History and Public Affairs Julian Zelizer (right) talk politics in the Friend Center. ON CAMPUS

On Wednesday, Oct. 2, awardwinning Democratic pollster Joel Benenson, who has worked on multiple presidential campaigns, gave University students a glimpse into the inner workings of a prominent political operation. At the event, titled “What the Press and Pundits Get Wrong: Reading the Electorate,” Benenson discussed what he sees as common errors in political strategy and misinterpretations of polling data. He also discussed his past experiences working with high-profile political candidates. Benenson consulted for Bill Clinton’s 1996 presidential campaign, Barack Obama’s 2008 and 2012 presidential campaigns, Hillary Clinton’s unsuccessful 2016 presidential campaign, and New Jersey Senator Bob Menendez’s 2018 successful re-election campaign. His firm currently advises presidential candidate Pete Buttigieg and Israeli Blue and White Party leader Benny Gantz. At the event, held in the Friend Center, Benenson was joined by

CNN political analyst and Wilson School professor Julian Zelizer. Benenson has been named “Pollster of the Year” by the American Association of Political Consultants and is the founder and CEO of Benenson Strategy Group, a nationwide consulting firm. He was invited to the Woodrow Wilson School as the Conor D. Reilly Distinguished Visitor in Leadership and Governance. Much of the talk centered on the challenges faced by campaign strategists, namely how to appeal to voters and respond to critics. Topics included Obama’s historic presidential campaign, the source of Clinton’s downfall in 2016, and the political dynamics that have characterized President Trump’s tumultuous tenure in office. In particular, Benenson made the distinction between “horse race” questions, which simply ask voters who they will vote for, and “more pertinent questions” about policy and the electorate itself. Many political analysts and pollsters, he said, are too focused on the “horse race.” “The job of a pollster isn’t just See BENENSON page 3

ON CAMPUS

U. faculty George, Singer discuss brain death with other professors Contributor

Months after Jahi McMath, a young California resident, was declared brain dead, she could clearly respond to instructions to move certain parts of her body. Medically ambiguous cases such as Jahi’s were the subject of a public discussion, which raised questions of what it really means to be dead, held on Wednesday. The seminar, moderated by Robert P. George, the McCormick Professor of Jurisprudence and Director of Princeton’s James Madison Program, featured D. Alan Shewmon, professor emeritus of neurology and pediatrics at UC Los Angeles; Patrick Lee, profes-

sor of philosophy and bioethics at Franciscan University of Steubenville; and Peter Singer, the Ira W. DeCamp Professor of Bioethics professor, spoke at the seminar. George began by offering a brief history of the controversial practice of organ removal in brain dead patients before introducing the ethical question of whether it should ever be done. “Should we abandon the dead donor rule and accept the idea that it’s morally acceptable for certain reasons, such as transplanting organs and saving lives of other people, to harvest organs from living but devastated individuals, or should we stick to the dead donor rule out of See BRAIN page 3

ALBERT JIANG / THE DAILY PRINCETONIAN

Gen. John R. Allen (left) and Professor Edward Felten (right) discuss artificial intelligence

Gen. Allen and Prof. Felten discuss the ethics of artificial intelligence By Albert Jiang Staff Writer

U . A F FA I R S

U. signs agreement with India’s largest renewable energy producer By Ngan Chiem Contributor

The University’s Andlinger Center for Energy and the Environment, the Indian Institute of Technology Delhi (IITD), and the top independent renewable energy producer in India, ReNew Power, have agreed to combine resources for future collaboration in the field of renewable energy. As part of the New Jersey division chosen by the economic development group ChooseNJ, Coleen Burrus,

In Opinion

director of the University’s Corporate Engagement and Foundation Relations team, along with representatives from Rutgers University, Rowan University, the New Jersey Institute of Technology, and New Jersey City University, signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with IITD and ReNew Power on Sept. 16 in Delhi, India. In a statement to the ‘Prince,’ Burrus wrote, that “the MOU … is a first step in initiating a dialogue that See ENERGY page 3

Contributing columnist Richard Ma appreciates the tranquility which writing brings him advises others to find a similar liberating outlet, and managing editor Samuel Aftel criticizes the social exclusivity and cruelty that defines Greek life and Bicker on campus.

PAGE 4

“There are two components to the idea of conflict,” said Gen. John R. Allen (ret.), president of the Brookings Institution, in his opening remarks. “The nature of war and the character of war.” “They exist in equilibrium,” he explained. Technology, which Allen identified with the character of war, helps achieve the best efficiency, outcome, and capability of the military, but often, “the technology outstrips the capacity of the human dimension” — the nature of war. Therein lies the practical and ethical challenges when dealing with artificial intelligence (AI), which were explored and discussed in the lecture “AI on the Battlefield: Ethics and Rules of Engagement,” held in the Maeder Hall Auditorium on Wednesday, Oct. 2, as part of the G. S. Beckwith Gilbert ’63 Lecture

Series. Edward W. Felten, professor of computer science and public affairs, moderated the talk. Felten held previous posts as the Chief Technologist for the Federal Trade Commission and the Deputy U.S. Chief Technology Officer under the Obama White House. Allen is a retired United States Marine Corps four-star general who served as the former commander of the NATO International Security Assistance Force and U.S. Forces in Afghanistan. Felten described how there has been a huge commercial interest and huge amounts of commercial research in AI. For once, he said, “the military is not in the driver’s seat of the basic development of technology here.” The reason for this, Allen explained, is because the nature of the technology is not clear. The “outer edges,” he said, are not fully understood, even among experts within the field. His main concern, how-

Today on Campus 4:00 p.m.: Hamilton Colloquium Series: “Magic Angle Twisted Bilayer Graphene”McCosh Hall 50 Jadwin Hall A10

ever, isn’t the fact that technology is changing but the “mind-boggling” rate at which that change is occuring. As such, it is crucial that the private sector — in relation to civil society, and thus, the military — to fully understand the process of resource development and deployment of capabilities when it comes to artificial technology. Allen stressed the importance of applying this technology with the highest level of ethics we are capable of. “This is a capability that has the capacity for great good,” he said, but also can be “applied with great destructiveness.” Even so, the enormous benefits of AI are not lost on him. The supercomputing capabilities in society today has allowed for big data analytics, which would not have been remotely possible in the past. Allen cited his own experiences in Afghanistan as See AI page 2

WEATHER

By Caitlin Limestahl

HIGH

60˚

LOW

58˚

Showers chance of rain:

80 percent

page 2

The Daily Princetonian

Thursday October 3, 2019

Allen: As a nation, we have to lead AI

Continued from page 1

01011101101000100101001010010010100100101110001 01010010111011010001001010010100100101001001011 10001010100101110110100010010100101001001010010 01011100010101001011101101000100101001010010010 10010010111000101010010111011010001001010010100 10010100100101110001010100101110110100010010100 10100100101001001011100010101001011101101000100 10100101001001010010010111000101010010111011010 00100101001010010010100100101110001010100101110 11010001001010010100100101001001011100010101001 01110110100010010100101001001010010010111000101 01001011101101000100101001010010010100100101110 00101010010111011010001001010010100100101001001 01110001010100101110110100010010100101001001010 01001011100010101001011101101000100101001010010 01010010010111000101010010111011010001001010010 11101101000100101001010010010100100101110001010 10010111011010001001010010100100101001001011100 01010100101110110100010010100101001001010010010 11100010101001011101101000100101001010010010100 10010111000101010010111011010001001010010100100 10100100101110001010100101110110100010010100101 00100101001001011100010101001011101101000100101 00101001001010010010111000101010010111011010001 00101001010010010100100101110001010100101110110 for (;;) 10001001010010100100101001001011100010101001011 { 10110100010010100101001001010010010111000101010 System.out.print(“Join ”); 01011101101000100101001010010010100100101110001 System.out.println(“Web!”); 01010010111011010001001010010100100101001001011 } 10001010100101110110101001010010100100101001001 01110001010100101110110100010010100101001001010 01001011100010101001011101101000100101001010010 01010010010111000101010010111011010001001010010 10010010100100101110001010100101110110100010010 Dream in code? 10010100100101001001011100010101001011101101000 10010100101001001010010010111000101010010111011 Join the ‘Prince’ web staff 01000100101001010010010100100101110001010100101 11011010001001010010100100101001001011100010101 00101110110100010010100101001001010010010111000 10101001011101101000100101001010010010100100101 11000101010010111011010001001010010100100101001 00101110001010100101110110100010010100101001001 join@dailyprincetonian.com 01001001011100010101001011101101000100101001010 01001010010010111000101010010111011010001001010 01010010010100100101110001010100101110110100010 01010010100100101001001011100010101001011101101 00010010100101001001010010010111000101010010111 01101000100101001010010010100100101110001010100 10111011010001001010010100100101001001011100010 10100101110110100010010100101001001010010010111 00010101001011101101000100101001010010010100100 10111000101010010111011010001001010010100100101 00100101110110100010010100101001001010010010111 00010101001011101101000100101001010010010100100 10111000101010010111011010001001010010100100101 00100101110001010100101110110100010010100101001 00101001001011100010101001011101101000100101001 01001001010010010111000101010010111011010001001 01001010010010100100101110001010100101110110100 01001010010100100101001001011100010101001011101 10100010010100101001001010010010111000101010010 11101101000100101001010010010100100101110001010 10010111011010001001010010100100101001001011100 01010100101110110100010010100101001001010010010 11100010101001011101101000100101001010010010100 10010111000101010010111011010001001010010100100 1010010010111000101010010111011010001001010010 10010010100100101110001010100101110110100010010 10010100100101001001011100010101001011101101000 1001010010100100101001001011100010101001011101 10100010010100101001001010010010111000101010010 11101101000100101001010010010100100101110001010 10010111011010001001010010100100101001001011100 01010100101110110100010010100101001001010010010 11100010101001011101101000100101001010010010100 10010111000101010010111011010001001010010100100 10100100101110001010100101110110100010010100101 00100101001001011100010101001011101101000100101 00101001001010010010111000101010010111011010001 00101001010010010100100101110001010100101110110 10001001010010100100101001001011100010101001011 10110100010010100101001001010010010111000101010 0101110110100010010100101001001010010010111000

.............

demonstrative of the potential of AI, in the form of both integrative efforts as well as programmed innovation. In the field of human resource management, he said, AI can greatly reduce the time spent filtering through thousands of candidates to mere seconds in order to “put the right person in the right position at the right spot at the right time.” AI can also save the military millions of dollars on supply discipline, Allen added. In one notable case, as Allen prepared to shrink the U.S. footprint in Afghanistan, he found 35,000 abandoned armored vehicles and 100,000 shipping containers full of supplies across 835 bases. Finding the supplies saved the military hundreds of millions of dollars, but the process had to be done manually across several months. “If all of that had been monitored using artificial intelligence through geospatial analysis,” Allen claimed, “I could know instantly what was on every base and inside every container.” Allen also highlighted potential benefits in combat situations. AI could allow for instantaneous diagnosis through evaluation of x-rays and analysis of blunt force organ trauma via wearable sensors. “As that individual is laid on the operating table in a surgical hospital, [we will] be completely ready to do what’s necessary to save that individual’s life.” On the flip side, AI applications in Lethal Autonomous Weapons Systems (LAWS) are rife with ethical concerns. Allen and the U.S. military prescribe three laws of armed conflict when AI is involved: necessity to employ force, distinction (ability to discriminate between combatant/non-combatants and estimate collateral damage), and proportionality (that is, not applying any more force than is absolutely needed). With this in mind, Allen stressed the distinction between automatic and autonomous systems. The latter, as defined by the International Committee of the Red Cross and which Allen himself has embraced, has three additional requirements: the system must be able to be recalled, recognize if the necessity for force has passed, and clearly distinguish between combatants and non-combatants. Despite our desire for speed and efficiency, he said, we are still “nowhere near where all three things can be achieved by an autonomous system.” “We as a nation — we as a people — have a military which is driven and guided by ethical principles,” he added. “We don’t engage in the destruction of life lightly.” Allen referred to the Department of Defense’s Directive 3000.09, written in 2012, as “one of the best articulations ever” on how the United States will handle autonomous systems. The salient requirement lies in the third enclosure: the system must incorporate “the necessary capabilities to allow commanders and operators to exercise appropriate levels of

human judgment in the use of force.” Felten highlighted the overall lack of international accountability and treaties regarding this technology and asked Allen to discuss the potential measures the United States can take to preserve integrity. In the hands of rogue nations, this domain in the cyber environment is easily corrupted. Cyber intrusion allows for the corruption of databases — both overt and covert — and generative adversarial networks (GANs) can create advanced images and topographical maps with absolutely no basis in reality. “When we talk about what artificial intelligence can do for us,” Allen explained, “we have to not just recognize that there are real military advantages, [but] there are real military liabilities if we don’t secure ourselves ... This is a very complex environment that we have to fully appreciate all the dynamics associated with.” In the question-and-answer portion of the event, Allen elaborated on what he perceived the United States’ role as a global leader to be — something that far transcended the realm of artificial intelligence. “First of all, as a nation, we have to lead,” Allen said. “To reassert our commitment to multilateralism, to reassert our commitment to human rights and humanitarian law, and to reassert our commitment to the community of our economic partners.” He cited the United States’ recent withdrawals from “one U.N. agency after another” and various treaties as a “huge blow to the community of nations.” “We can handle our differences we have with the Chinese. We can handle the Russians. We can handle the jihadists,” he said. The one thing the U.S. cannot handle, though, is the climate. “It may be too late,” he added. “When the United States withdrew its leadership from the Paris Climate Accord, when the United States doesn’t show up to the report on sustainable development goals ... that’s the kind of challenge that is really existential if we’re not careful.” Allen stressed the importance of reestablishing America as the recognizable beacon of liberal democracy it once was. “I’ve met many of the leaders of the countries whose forces I’ve [worked] with,” he explained. “They’re desperate for the reemergence of American global leadership.” “Much of what the world has been able to achieve in the aftermath of the Cold War has been directly as a result of the United States’ leadership in partnership with similar countries. And in the absence of this partnership, there goes climate, there goes sustainable development goals, there goes the TPP [Trans-Pacific Partnership], we pulled out of the JCPOA [Iran nuclear deal] ... and we backed ourselves into a crisis in the Middle East in which we find ourselves embroiled in a war.” “This requires American leadership,” Allen proclaimed. “And frankly, I don’t see much of it these days.”

Done reading your ‘Prince’? Recycle

Thursday October 3, 2019

The Daily Princetonian

page 3

Singer: We are taking organs from living human beings BRAIN

Continued from page 1

.............

respect for people’s lives, even if those lives are regarded as extremely poor in quality?” George asked. Shewmon used Jahi’s case, among others, to justify his argument that brain death is not synonymous with death in the traditional sense. Lee disagreed. “Total irreversible brain death is the death of a human being. After a brain death, we don’t have the same being that was there before. If there is a living organism there, it is not a human organism,” Lee said. Lee’s philosophical stance raises new questions about what qualities need to be

present for an organism to be classified as a human being. “In order to be a human being, you have to be a sentient being,” he said. Human beings, he noted, must display “the capacity to develop a brain.” Singer was the final panelist to take the stage, and he explained that he, like Shewmon, believes that brain death does not constitute true death. He argued that MRI scans are often inefficient and inappropriate in determining whether one is truly, irreversibly devoid of consciousness, and that the practice should be altered. “It’s interesting that there really hasn’t been a widespread move to stand up and say that we should do something about this,” Singer said. “We are taking organs from

living human beings.” In keeping with his wellknown utilitarian views, Singer said that if an irreversible loss of consciousness could be determined with certainty, and that if a patient demonstrated such a loss, then no ethical objection to removing organs, even vital ones, and using them to benefit others would arise, because “it’s justifiable to say that there is no further benefit to that human being in continuing to live.” The night ended with a brief question-and-answer session. The seminar, entitled “The Challenge to ‘Brain Death’: Are We Taking Organs from Living Human Beings, and If We Are, Does It Matter?” was held in McCosh Hall 50 on October 2 at 4:30 p.m.

CAITLIN LIMESTAHL / THE DAILY PRINCETONIAN

From left to right: Peter Singer, Patrick Lee, D. Alan Shewmon, and Robert George.

Benenson also worked U. MOU with IITD, ReNew provides with NJ senator Menendez students access to Green Scholars Program BENENSON Continued from page 1

............. to take your temperature,” Benenson said. “The job of a pollster and a strategist is really to go beneath the surface and try to unearth what my firm calls ‘the hidden architecture of opinion’: what’s really going on in people’s lives.” This “hidden” perspective, Benenson explained, is necessary in order to truly understand the American electorate, a constantly evolving country without static demographics. Some campaigns, he said, underestimate people’s tendency to change over time. “I think you make a big mistake politically if you start assuming that demographics are destiny,” he said. “You’ve got to earn every vote.” Though he acknowledged the importance of preparation during any campaign, Benenson emphasized the importance of being able to adapt. Every campaign, he said, is bound to encounter “three” major unexpected pitfalls. The way campaigns adapt to such sudden challenges, Benenson explained, “determines who wins and who loses.” These issues came into play during Clinton’s unsuccessful presidential campaign in 2016, for which Benenson served as chief strategist. Clinton’s biggest pitfall, he said, revolved around her use of a private email server. He explained how the campaign’s lack of internal knowledge on the matter made quick adaptation difficult. “We didn’t know about it,” he said. “We started working on that campaign in late December … a big chunk of us found out about it in March, when it was on the front page of the paper one morning.” Though Clinton’s loss was surprising to many, Benenson said that the polls were not necessarily wrong, just poorly represented. Many news outlets, he said, would present horse race polls with Clinton in the lead, rather than discussing the underlying trends behind the polls and the fact that her lead was declining over time in battleground states. Benenson also talked about his role as a polling specialist for Obama’s campaigns in 2008 and 2012 and compared and contrasted Obama’s re-election campaign to what he expects out of Trump’s 2020 campaign. He said that one of Obama’s greatest strengths, his ability to unite the nation, is one of Trump’s greatest weaknesses, noting Trump’s low approval ratings when it comes to handling national tragedies. “Obama had what I call ‘reparative skills.’ Obama had enough introspection and self-awareness that, if he had to fix problems, he would work on fixing problems with the electorate,” he said. Benenson sees Trump’s “narcissism” as preventing him from practicing similarly unifying behavior. With regards to Trump, Zelizer asked Benenson what he

sees in the polls that seek to determine public support for impeachment. “Having an impeachment inquiry is a totally legitimate exercise,” Benenson replied. “I think it’s hard for me to fathom that the majority of Americans will [think] that asking and inviting a foreign leader to provide dirt on one of your political opponents isn’t an impeachable offense.” Benenson also mentioned his role in the 1996 election of Bill Clinton to his second term as President and discussed Bob Menendez’s controversial but ultimately successful 2018 Senate bid in New Jersey. Menendez’s campaign was overshadowed by his 2015 indictment on corruption charges, which were later dropped after a hung jury was unable to reach a verdict on Menendez’s case. Benenson explained how polls conducted at the time showed that while many voters believed Menendez was corrupt, they also felt that his actions were no different than those of other politicians. “His opponent attacked him relentlessly on it, ran ads on it — we never responded to the ads on Menendez’s corruption, because we knew it was falling on deaf ears,” he said. Menendez defeated his Republican challenger Robert Hugin ’76, a former University Trustee. Benenson also recently returned from Israel, where he was advising Israeli opposition party leader Benny Gantz in his recent campaign against sitting Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. In addition to explaining the complexities of Israel’s parliamentary system, Benenson discussed what he saw as misconceptions in conventional thinking on Israeli politics. “When I first got there, a lot of what I heard was, ‘Every election is about security … that’s Netanyahu’s strength,’” he said. “But there were other things going on in Israel. My job was to figure out why, and in my first poll, things like healthcare and education were popping up.” In the question-and-answer session, which followed the discussion with Zelizer, one student brought up the donor record of presidential hopeful Mayor Pete Buttigieg, one of Benenson’s current clients, which Benenson countered with a reference to Buttigieg’s grassroots fundraising and more than 600,000 small donors to date. Another audience member asked him to make predictions about the outcome of 2020 Democratic primaries, to which he responded that he does not have “a crystal ball.” Benenson recognized the emphasis many voters have placed on “electability,” but noted that most primary voters consider their candidate of choice “electable.” Though “electability” is difficult to quantify, Benenson said that candidates will be able to prove their electability in time. “Winning primaries makes you look electable,” he said, “and the first ballot is money.”

ENERGY

Continued from page 1

.............

we hope will encourage new collaborations in the areas of energy and environmental sustainability.” The University also signed a second MOU with IITD and ReNew, providing two of the University’s students with the opportunity to participate in ReNew Power’s Global Green Scholars Program. Founded in 2017, the program gathers young people from around the world to discuss and develop solutions to issues of sustainable energy. Five members are accepted each year. According to the program’s most recent 2018 report, no Princeton student has ever participated in the project.

JON ORT / THE DAILY PRINCETONIAN

The University’s partnership with IITD will focus on improving alternative energy resources on campus.

You could be this guy.

Write for the ‘Prince.’ Email join@dailyprincetonian.com

Opinion

Thursday October 3, 2019

page 4

{ www.dailyprincetonian.com }

Remembering what centers you Richard Ma

Contributing Columnist

was eight years old

when my grandpa gave me my first journal one summer day in Nanjing. My grandpa’s the most prolific writer I’ve ever known, partly by necessity. Years ago, he underwent an operation because of a cancer that has effectively robbed him of his voice. I don’t know what his words sound like, and I never would have been able to communicate with him were it not for our shared knowledge of English. In his room stacked high with books of all sorts, I would sit on his bed and write to him while he sat on his stool eating a late lunch and watching history talks on TV. From the hospital, he had an unlimited collection of manuals with red binding, and we would write notes to each other for hours on their blank backs. The next summer, he beckoned me into his room as soon as I arrived and showed

me a much higher-quality notebook from the bookstore that he had bought to transcribe our conversations. But years later, he still had the red-lined manuals from when I was eight. My first journal, the one he got me, was thick and took me nearly two years to finish. During this time, I was embarrassed to have a diary, and the only people who knew about its existence were my grandparents and parents, who I’m sure read it for laughs. Since it was predominantly filled with matter-of-fact recountings of what Ninja Turtles episode I was about to watch, I didn’t particularly care. But as the years passed, I found myself writing with much more care. I had begun to fear forgetting. This was partly a result of my early days writing down simply what had happened that day; later, when I read over these old entries, I wondered just how many ordinary yet revealing events I was neglecting to transcribe, thus losing

them to the constant stream of new, transient memories. I resolved to write more, capturing vignettes of my day and snapshots of time. My writing habit bled over into countless Word docs written during late nights. In high school, I began to write poetry as well. Taking those moments to reflect and push my thoughts onto the page kept a quiet peace inside me. I stopped writing as much when I came to Princeton. I sometimes felt a lack of energy, or a lack of time, or a burden of priority. There are things that people do to seek solace and recharge, and my thing – writing – was becoming scarcer and scarcer. Over the summer after freshman year, I rediscovered some of the rejuvenation that writing afforded me. As much as writing sometimes entails reliving the past, which has certainly influenced my propensity for nostalgia, it’s also my most familiar way of living in the present. Princeton is a blur; days and weeks pass

without notice, and suddenly half a semester is gone. Writing centers me. It’s only in the quiet moments that I can appreciate the chaotic beauty of Princeton. It’s important, as you embark on your semester here, whether it be your first or last, to do those things that give you great joy, or rather, great tranquility. There’s often a temptation or an inexorable pull to let your time pass in the current of clubs and academics, of once again filling your current stage of life with plans to improve the next. I urge you to afford yourself some space from this relentless process. For me, I think of my grandpa, crouched on a stool over some noodles, surrounded by his spire of books. I think of the pages I’ve filled with memories and the nights I’ve lived quietly. I write. Richard Ma is a sophomore from Kirksville, Missouri. He can be reached at richardma@princeton.edu.

Bicker, Greek life, and the lonelier side of Princeton Sam Aftel

Managing Editor

he other day, a

close friend reintroduced me to Lana Del Rey’s devastating, beautiful single “Summertime Sadness” (2012), which narrates the summersymbolizing suicide of two lesbian lovers. As many have noted, the notion of summertime sadness feels oxymoronic, given our culture’s association of winter with depression and summer with eroticized, sun-soaked ecstasy. But summertime melancholy is indeed an extraordinarily real experience for those prone to depression and loneliness. The times when it seems most people are having a ball — a perception informed by beachy Instagram pictures and other modern mechanisms of misleading selfpresentation — are often the most excruciating for the isolated. The notion of summertime sadness is all too relevant to the Princeton social scene. Some of the most ostensibly joyous occasions of the Princeton calendar — namely, the culmination of Bicker and Greek life initiations, when some Princetonians find tight-knit communities and concurrent opportunities for partying and interpersonal intimacy — are also the most painful. During these festivities, it’s easy to inadvertently

— or intentionally — forget that many other Princetonians are locked up in their dorms, enduring the trauma of being left out, of being denied the sort of social intimacy human beings inherently crave, while their peers get to play hard. Yes, I realize those who are cut from certain fraternities or sororities can usually find other Greek organizations who are willing to include them; likewise, I realize those who are denied Bicker club membership can join a sign-in club. But these measures are simply pseudo-restorative, insufficient remedial Band-Aids in response to systems put in place to ruthlessly designate a Princetonian’s social position. Last month, as many sororities and fraternities selectively offered membership to Princetonians who rushed, a classmate lamented on Tiger Confessions, “I looooooove bid day[,] when the fact that a group of girls made an arbitrary decision about your self-worth gets shoved in your face all day.” Yet, even as some students endured socialized stress and alienation, Greek life members celebrated the end of rush by taking to the Street. Of course, the Greek life and Bicker club members out on the Street having a good time are not sadistic people or worthy of unique judgement. Undoubtedly, both the included and the excluded — all Princetonians, in other words, very much including myself — are, to varying degrees, complicit in the workings of

Princeton’s competitive, hierarchical social scene. It’s also worth noting that the vast majority of Princetonians I have had the privilege of befriending, no matter their eating club or Greek life affiliations, are deeply kind and admirably moral people. Still, exclusion and marginalization thrive when good people lose sight of their arbitrary social capital or become desensitized to the suffering of their peers who haven’t accumulated such capital. “Summertime sadness” at Princeton is a double-edged tragedy: the victims are stung both by social alienation and the relative apathy of those who’ve never experienced the psychic torment of isolation. At the end of the day, there may be no realistic solution to systematized marginalization at Princeton. To me, a campus without Bicker and Greek life seems like a healthier one — in a previous Prince column, I called for the wholesale abolition of Bicker. But, admittedly, I could very well be wrong: such drastic reforms are likely implausible and could have substantial unintended consequences. Nonetheless, there’s a litany of exhaustingly welldocumented reasons why Greek life and Bicker are unjustifiable, and they deserve consideration. Here’s several: these processes de facto discriminate on the basis of identity, economic standing, and campus affiliation and create social cleavages along these lines; they break up friendships and create an

Keep yourself informed on the go!

@Princetonian

environment of resentment and envy; they designate social worth in the most arbitrary and inordinately hurtful of fashions; they’re unnecessary for the basic functioning of the University; and, most harrowingly, they reinforce the epidemic of relational transactions and sexual violence on campus. Many of us aren’t even willing to imagine a social landscape without Bicker and Greek life, as if Princeton wouldn’t be Princeton without these institutions. Sadly, they may have a point. Given the social structure of Princeton life, a campus without Bicker or Greek life would radically disrupt sacralized traditions and uproot uber-naturalized University mores. It’s much easier to make a negative argument against Bicker and Greek life than it is to make positive assertions about what could replace such phenomena. At the very least, though, we should acknowledge that the continued practice of Bicker and Greek life is a conscious choice that we, as a student body, make. There’s nothing from stopping us from imagining and eventually creating a social scene without these exclusionary traditions — nothing except our own unwillingness to confront our collective complicity in an inequitable system. Samuel Aftel is a senior from East Northport, N.Y. He can be reached at saftel@princeton.edu.

vol. cxliii

editor-in-chief

Chris Murphy ’20 business manager

Taylor Jean-Jacques’20 BOARD OF TRUSTEES president Thomas E. Weber ’89 vice president Craig Bloom ’88 secretary Betsy L. Minkin ’77 treasurer Douglas J. Widmann ’90 trustees Francesca Barber David Baumgarten ’06 Kathleen Crown Gabriel Debenedetti ’12 Stephen Fuzesi ’00 Zachary A. Goldfarb ’05 Michael Grabell ’03 John Horan ’74 Joshua Katz Rick Klein ’98 James T. MacGregor ’66 Alexia Quadrani Marcelo Rochabrun ’15 Kavita Saini ’09 Richard W. Thaler, Jr. ’73 Abigail Williams ’14 trustees emeriti Gregory L. Diskant ’70 William R. Elfers ’71 Kathleen Kiely ’77 Jerry Raymond ’73 Michael E. Seger ’71 Annalyn Swan ’73 trustees ex officio Chris Murphy ’20 Taylor Jean-Jacques’20

143RD MANAGING BOARD managing editors Samuel Aftel ’20 Ariel Chen ’20 Jon Ort ’21 head news editors Benjamin Ball ’21 Ivy Truong ’21 associate news editors Linh Nguyen ’21 Claire Silberman ’22 Katja Stroke-Adolphe ’20 head opinion editor Cy Watsky ’21 associate opinion editors Rachel Kennedy ’21 Ethan Li ’22 head sports editor Jack Graham ’20 associate sports editors Tom Salotti ’21 Alissa Selover ’21 features editors Samantha Shapiro ’21 Jo de la Bruyere ’22 head prospect editor Dora Zhao ’21 associate prospect editor Noa Wollstein ’21 chief copy editors Lydia Choi ’21 Elizabeth Parker ’21 associate copy editors Anna McGee ’22 Sydney Peng ’22 head design editor Charlotte Adamo ’21 associate design editor Harsimran Makkad ’22 head video editor Sarah Warman Hirschfield ’20 associate video editor Mark Dodici ’22 digital operations manager Sarah Bowen ’20

NIGHT STAFF copy Isabel Rodrigues ’23 design Ava Jiang ’21

Opinion

? Thursday October 3, 2019

{ www.dailyprincetonian.com }

What could I be at T HE DA ILY

Arts Photographer

Programmer Cartoonist

Layout Designer

Copy Editor

Reporter

Graphic Artist

Sports writer

Columnist

Ad Sales Manager

Videographer

If you see yourself

writingthinkingreporting doodlingdrawingexpressing communicatingdescribing photographingprogramming in college, check us out

join@dailyprincetonian.com

page 5

Sports

Thursday October 3, 2019

page 6

{ www.dailyprincetonian.com } FIELD HOCKEY

Princeton field hockey bounces back against Dartmouth, No. 11 Delaware By Molly Milligan Senior Staff Writer

No. 12 Princeton field hockey (5–4 overall, 1–0 Ivy League) started a new two-game win streak this week with victories over Dartmouth and No. 11 Delaware. Princeton ended a threegame losing streak with a 4–0 takedown of Dartmouth (2–5, 0–1) in its Ivy League opener on Saturday. Just six minutes into the game, junior striker Clara Roth picked up a loose ball in front of the goal and turned the score in the Tigers’ favor. In the first quarter alone, Princeton produced six shots and two corners. Scoring resumed in the second period, as first-year midfielder Sammy Popper drilled home a backhanded shot off a corner. The defense did its part, too, not allowing a shot until the 21st minute of the game. Princeton added two more scores in the fourth quarter of play. Early on, sophomore striker Ali McCarthy perfectly deflected a shot by sophomore midfielder Hannah Davey off a corner. Five minutes later, Popper added her second goal of the day. Her shot, off yet another corner, bounced off the Dartmouth goalie’s shin-guard and into the back of the net. Princeton outshot Dart-

mouth 24–4 and came away with a 9–2 advantage on corners, thus sustaining its winning streak, which dates back to 2011, against the Big Green. Popper was honored as one of The Daily Princetonian’s Players of the Weekend for her play in Hanover. Roth also took home her second Ivy League Offensive Player of the Week of the season for her performances against Dartmouth and No. 4 Maryland earlier in the week. She scored twice in the Tigers’ overtime loss to the Terrapins last Tuesday, followed by a goal and two assists against the Big Green. Roth leads the team with 17 points so far this season, including five goals and seven assists. Tuesday evening, Princeton continued its non-conference slate in front of 222 fans at No. 11 Delaware (6–2 overall). The Blue Hens had won four of the previous six meetings coming into this season’s match-up, but the Tigers came away with the victory last year, 4–2. In this year’s matchup, Princeton continued its winning ways, ultimately prevailing 1–0. It was a defensive battle in the first half, as the Tigers held the Blue Hens without a shot during the first 30 minutes of play. Delaware would not even earn its first corner try until the clock was running out on the third quarter.

BEVERLY SCHAEFER / GOPRINCETONTIGERS.COM

Clara Roth won her second Ivy League Offensive Player of the Week award after notching a goal and two assists against Dartmouth.

Princeton, too, was struggling on offense until late in the game. McCarthy picked up a steal with just 2:09 left to play and fired a shot that resulted in a loose ball. Hannah Davey, however, scooped up the ball and sent it into the back of the net, making the only score of

the night. With the win, senior goalie Grace Baylis is now second alltime, with 44 career victories, in the history of the University’s program. Princeton will return home on Friday to take on Yale (2–5, 0–1) at 5 p.m. at Bedford Field.

The Bulldogs are on a two-game losing streak, with losses coming against No. 16 Harvard and Hofstra, both by a score of 1–2. The game is no doubt a mustwin for Princeton, as the Tigers continue to hunt for their second Ivy League regular season title in the last three years.

FOOTBALL

From the archives: After 13 years—a perfect season: Tigers hold back Cornell, 17–12 Editor’s Note: In honor of the 150th season of Princeton Football, The Daily Princetonian will be republishing football articles from our archives. This article was originally published Nov. 23, 1964, the Monday after Princeton defeated Cornell to secure an undefeated season, its last until 2018. The referee’s gun cracked, tailback Don McKay heaved the ball straight up, and when it came down Princeton locked up the first perfect season for Old Nassau since 1951. The Tigers had outslugged Cornell, 17-12, Saturday in a frustrating rushing battle that caused coach Dick Colman to wear a path up and down the sideline. After rolling up an early twotouchdown bulge, the Tigers were outplayed in the second half by a rough Big Red offense that whittled Princeton’s margin to two points with seven minutes left. But when Cornell gambled for the two-point-tying PAT, corner linebacker Don Roth broke into the backfield to slam halfback Pete Larson to the ground and take Princeton off the chopping block. With one eye on the clock and another on Cornell’s rough offensive line, Colman sent in Charlie Gogolak to sidewind a field goal five minutes later. And when Lynn Sutcliffe intercepted a lastminute pass by second-string Big Red quarterback Bill Abel, the undefeated season was on ice. “This was the toughest offensive line we’ve faced,” Colman said. “They made good, hard blocks. But our line may have

been a little tight under the tremendous pressure,” he added. After regular quarterback Marty Sponaugle limped off the field in the second period, fullback Bill Wilson shouldered the Cornell offensive duties. Gaining 119 yards in 26 carries, Wilson overshadowed the 96-yard performance of Cosmo lacavazzi. But to the victors go the spoils, and lacavazzi’s 96 yards established a new Ivy League single season rushing record. The Princeton fullback also wrote new records for Princeton career scoring, single season rushing, and Ivy League career touchdowns and points. A weak Cornell punt gave the Tigers the initial advantage. Taking the ball on the Big Red 34, the Bengals scored seven plays later when lacavazzi plunged over. Running off the box formation, McKay repeatedly swept the Cornell ends, following the blocking of Roy Pizzarello and Stas Maliszewski. Maliszewski also had 19 tackles. After the game, Cornell coach Tom Harp pointed out that he had gambled with a defense which uses a “rover” who plays either on one end or as a safetyman depending upon the situation. “It’s hard to stop the end run without an end,” he commented. The Tigers’ second touchdown was set up when Don Pett jarred a fumble from Cornell halfback Gabe Durishin. Taking his pick of open receivers Doug Tufts and Jack Singer in the end zone, McKay tossed an eight-yard pass to Tufts for the score.

Tweet of the Day “An @IvyLeague weekend at Dillon. What could be better?” princeton volleyball (@ princetonvolley)

Stat of the Day

6 Goals

Check us out on Twitter @princesports for live news and reports, and on Instagram @princetoniansports for photos!

Princeton men’s soccer set a season best with six goals in a win against St. Joe’s Tuesday