Monday, March 7, 2022
The Student Voice of California State University, Fullerton
Volume 111 Issue 8
ASI candidates prepare for elections Presidential candidates debated in the Becker Amphitheater ahead of this week’s vote. ZIMRY HERNANDEZ Staff Writer
Presidential candidates for Cal State Fullerton’s Associated Students held a debate on March 2 at the Becker Amphitheater to share their platforms with students. In total, three pairs of candidates are running to become the next president and vice president of ASI next year: David Velazquez‐Zamarripa and Marcus Arnwine, Lydia Kelley and Christapor Mikaelian, and Marcos Zelada‐Rodas and Gabriella Antos. Zelada‐Rodas and Antos did not attend the debate. The debate lasted one hour as both pairs of candidates were able to share their platforms and give rebuttals to counter points raised by the other team. The candidates were also able to respond directly to attendees’ questions. One common theme that both pairs of candidates presented emphasized increasing student involvement on campus. Kelley said that “many students do not know what ASI is,” and announced that her and Mikaelian plan
David Velazquez-Zamarripa (left) Marcus Arnwine (left) Lydia Kelley (right) and Christapor Mikaelian (right). (Spencer Otte / Daily Titan) on promoting tailgates before athletic events to get students “acclimated to the campus environment and get them excited about the events that we have here on campus.” Velazquez‐Zamarripa said he and Arnwine will look to make events like Discoverfest and All Day ASI
more accessible to students, placing an emphasis on making those events fit student’s schedules. Another major topic of discussion was how both pairs of candidates would promote student safety on campus with both pairs offering different solutions. Velazquez‐Zamarripa
Titans split final home games Men’s basketball ended their season second in the Big West with an 11-4 conference record. NAVTEJ HUNDAL Deputy Editor
ANTHONY BAUTISTA Managing Editor
After a close loss against UC Riverside on March 3 in Titan Gym, Cal State Fullerton men’s basketball responded with a 62-59 comeback victory over the UC Davis Aggies in the team’s final regular-season contest. For CSUF head coach Dedrique Taylor, this marks the best regular and conference record in his tenure at CSUF. The victory earned Fullerton the second seed at the upcoming Big West Conference Tournament in Henderson, Nevada, next week. Fullerton will have five days of rest before the opening game of the tournament, but Taylor has his sights set on the postseason. “Obviously, the historical value is awesome, but I’m more so excited about what this group was able to get done tonight to hopefully propel us into the tournament,” Taylor said. Senior forward E.J. Anosike led Fullerton in scoring and rebounding with 20 points and eight rebounds. VISIT US AT: DAILYTITAN.COM
Junior guard Tray Maddox Jr. finished with 12 points off the bench against UC Davis. Senior guard Jalen Harris also added 14 points off the bench in his final home game. With three minutes left in regulation, UC Davis called a timeout prior to sending Anosike to the free-throw line leading 55-46. Following this timeout, Anosike went on a 7-0 run and made the score 55-53 with just over two minutes left to play. Anosike then fouled UC Davis’
Caleb Fuller, who converted both free throws to put the Aggies ahead 57-53 before a 3-point play by Maddox Jr., 57-56. Harris checked into the game for the final time with 93 seconds left to play, but it was all the time he needed to make his presence felt and secure Fullerton’s victory. Harris grabbed a rebound on the defensive end, which led to an Anosike putback layup to give the Titans the lead, 58-57, with 54 seconds left. SEE REBOUND
8
Vincent Lee (left) helps defend a UC Riverside guard on March 3 inside Titan Gym. (Navtej Hundal / Daily Titan)
mentioned that the two of them would focus on building more emergency blue phones around campus, where a police officer responds to whoever pressed the button within five minutes. Kelley and Mikaelian mentioned they would create a survey to see how
students feel about campus policing and would work off those results to see how they can improve their relations with campus police officers.
SEE VOTE
2
CSU allows faculty to address bias in student surveys TIM PETERSEN Staff Writer
MATTHEW KEYSER Editor
The ratification of a new Cal State University faculty contract now gives professors on campus the explicit right to rebut sexist, racist and prejudiced bias in student evaluations. While this seems like a win for faculty across the CSU, the recent negotiations have shown an unrefuted bias in evaluations towards women, Black, Indigenous and people of color and LGBTQ faculty. Student Opinion Questionnaires, known as SOQs play an important role in the review of faculty for raises, reappointment, tenure and promotions. In the past, faculty have always had the right to rebut certain biases but only to an extent. Michele Barr, a full-time lecturer at Cal State Fullerton in the Department of Kinesiology and vice president of Fullerton’s California Faculty Association, said that faculty members never had the opportunity to address specific language related to discriminatory bias in evaluations. “Initially, when we brought that up,
management’s response was, “No, we don’t want that language in there,’” Barr said. “Obviously we came a long way, but again, why the no stance on there initially, I don’t really know.” Under the new agreement, reviews must consider the rebuttals when reviewing the underlying student opinions. “It’s a difficult situation because student evaluations are important,” Barr said. “But I mean there is just unrefuted evidence that women, folks of color, LGBTQ are rated lower, not based on content, not based on you know, the actual teaching.” Toni Molle, the director for strategic communication and public affairs of the Chancellor’s Office said the faculty negotiating team brought up student bias in evaluation forms so they incorporated detailed language in the collective bargaining agreement regarding bias. “If they feel that a faculty evaluation is still damaging another course of action that they could also request is to meet with a campus administrator to discuss it and to provide additional insight onto it,” Molle said. SEE CRITICISM
3
FOLLOW US: @THEDAILYTITAN