Segment 2 Portfolio by Darian Mason

DARIAN MASON MASTERS OF ARCHITECTURE II January 3, 2012

design portfolio: DARIAN G. MASON

name: program: segment: date:

RESUME

education: Boston Architectural College, Boston, MA Sept. 2007 - Present M. Arch Candidate

Darian Mason Intern Architectural Designer

Cincinnati Christian University, Cincinnati, OH 2006 B.A. Biblical Studies/ Urban & Intercultural Studies

EXPERIENCE SUMMARY Mr. Mason is an intern architect with more than 3 years of experience in architectural design and drafting. As a staff architect at Watermark Environmental, he has served as technical drafting support for the architectural projects of the firm. As such, he is currently engaged design/build projects for both private and government clients that include restoration and design.

experience: Watermark Environmental Inc., Lowell, MA December 2010 - Present Staff Architectural Designer

PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS Boston Society of Architects (BSA), American Institute of Architecture Students (AIAS)

Evolo Skyscraper Competition, Boston, MA November 2010 – January 2011 Special project with Boston Architectural College

REGISTRATIONS/CERTIFICATIONS Currently registered in the Intern Development Program (IDP)

EMPLOYMENT HISTORY Watermark Environmental, Inc.; December 2010 to Present Intern Architectural Designer

Hale Reservation, Westwood, MA October 2009 – July 2010 Special project with Boston Architectural College

Safdie Architects, (Moshe Safdie and Associates, Inc.); Sept. 2008 to Jan. 2009 Senior Staff Assistant, Document Controller

Cambridge Seven Associates, Cambridge, MA March 2009 – Dec 2009 Internship

REPRESENTATIVE EXPERIENCE Building P-481- New London Shipyard, Groton, CT- As part of the Design/ Build team, was architectural draftsman for the design-build (D/B) of a new indoor small arms range facility. US Army Core of Engineers Veteran’s Affairs Medical Center, Providence, RI – As part of the Design/Build team, was project draftsman for the renovation and conversion of the steam heating units for a multistory hospital.

Moshe Safdie and Associates, Inc., Somerville, MA September 2008- January 2009 Senior Staff Assistant, Document Controller The YouthBuild Boston: Summer 2008 Designery Fellow

ACTIVITIES Boston Architectural College Special Projects: Evolo Skyscraper Competition (Winter 2010) Fields Corner Library redesign, Boston, MA (Fall 2010) Hale Reservation Redesign of the Cucchiara Learning Center, Westwood, MA (2009)

Post College Trip: London; Edinburgh, United Kingdom Summer 2006 College Internship: Haikou, People’s Republic of China July 2005- January 2006 English Teacher: Tokyo; Nagano, Japan Summer 2004

travel:

resume: RESUME

Field’s Corner Library, Boston, MA September 2010 - January 2011 Special project with Boston Architectural College

EDUCATION/TRAINING Masters of Architecture Candidate / Boston Architectural College

INTENT

As a designer, I am guided by context of place and program but also inspired by a designâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s ability to mold perception and experience. This portfolio is intended to demonstrate my past design experience and skill through both practice and academic work. I have concluded four C-level studios and my past design work includes Special Projects undertaken with the Practice Department of Boston Architectural College as well as my recent work with Watermark Environmental Inc. of Lowell Massachusetts. I have approached each project with curiosity and rigor. I intend to present both the challenges and opportunities these projects have provided for design, creativity, and technical detailing.

CONTENTS Introduction Resume 2-3 Intent 4 Content 5 Section 1: C-2 Studio Work

Space of Vision 8 Reinventing the Inner City 20 Generating the Spectacle 38 Concrete Thinking 54 Section 2: Special Projects

Field’s Corner Library: Dorchester, MA

Evolo Skyscraper Competition: Chicago, IL

100

Section 3: Practice

111

Watermark Environmental, Inc. - Building P-481: Groton, CT 112

- 40 Church Street: Lowell, MA

124

- Milton CAT Facility: North Reading, MA

132

- St. John’s High School; Brother’s Residence

140

- Lowell Housing Authority 150

intent: CONTENTS

Hale Reservation: Westwood, MA 74

Studio Work

The pages that follow present my work through four studios.

Summer 2009:

Space of Vision

Fall 2009:

Reinventing the Inner City

Spring 2010:

Generating the Spectacle

Fall 2010:

Concrete Thinking

SECTION 1

academics: C-2 STUDIO

Presented in chronological order:

In this process, the concept was derived from a photograph that was chosen for its spatial qualities. This photograph became a foil and the key to generating the project’s themes. This project began with a study of aperture; the photography based concept of opening, view, and perception. The introduction and study of the site provided opportunities to “read into” the presented site and to develop a site concept that could be applied to the program. The program for this site was related to the surrounding buildings and provided a new perspective on both the generative photograph and the site concept. Finally, the generative photo, site, and program, coalesced into the final design. The success of this project was based in large part on a reading of sensory experience in a place.

term: SUMMER 2009 (8 weeks) instructor: CHERYL WOLFE

The project followed a set trajectory of concept, site, program, and design.

c-2 studio: SPACE OF VISION

SPACE OF VISION

C-1 Studio: Space of Vision INSPIRATION Prompted by the photograph, this project entailed extracting spatial Preliminary

Site Study

relationships from the two dimensional image. This process was explored through model making.

movement / non movement zones

The alleyway that splits Boston Architectural College (BAC), between 951 Boylston Street and 320 Newbury Street, would become the site. Though we were familiar with the general area through attending classes at the school this study required us to gather information that was both tangible and experiential to create a site concept to pair with the spatial understandings derived from the photograph. Original photograph by Judith Turner

Lightbox created using board and trace

Three dimensional model of implied connections

Three dimensional model of implied space

Site Study

SITE STUDY

movement / non movement zones

The initial site study fixated on the contrast of program space and circulation. This approach in site concept would become a central theme in the design concept.

PROGRAM EDGE CONDITION

CIRCULATION

PROGRAM AND CIRCULATION ABSTRACT

CIRCULATION

PROGRAM

Study of the circulation and program around site

The shape of the alley brought to focus

LESS DENSE

DENSE

Framing the existing space of the site in section

Framing the existing space of the site in plan

Study of circulation and program within the two buildings abutting the site

SITE STUDY

Site Study

Phenom

Site Study

Phenom

The initial site study highlighted the contrasting textures of the two buildings that are adjacent to the alley. These areas are created through the need for both program and circulation.

PROGRAM

Though the program is contained, and the circulation produces boundary conditions, the combination of program space and circulation resulted in a stark contrast between flat and vertical.

EDGE CONDITION

CIRCULATION

This edge condition is a key design concept

Image of the building exterior’s impact on circulation and program PROGRAM AND CIRCULATION ABSTRACT

Image of the building’s public face and texture

CIRCULATION

PROGRAM

PROGRAM EDGE CONDITION

PROGRAM

EDGE CONDITION

Example of the edge conditions existing on the site

CIRCULATION CIRCULATION PROGRAM AND CIRCULATION ABSTRACT

CIRCULATION PROGRAM AND CIRCULATION ABSTRACT

Model of a framed path on the site

Model of a covered path on the site

PROGRAM CIRCULATION

PROGRAM

Example of the texture existing on the site

Site sun study: Morning

Site sun study: Evening

Site Study

Phen

SITE CONCEPT C-1 Studio: Space of Vision

Further site study revealed the separation of the student body. Program C-1 Space ThePhenomenology BAC Studio: includes day studentsof andVision night students, pedestrians Phenomenology Programat an adjacent passing by one side of the building but loitering Media Lab side. Media Lab 951 Boylston

951 Boylston The effect of the buildingâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s edge conditions on circulation and Gallery program created a possible solution to the disconnection Gallery of the student body.

320 Newbury 320 Newbury

Offices

Offices Offices Media Lab

As the campus expands to include multiple buildings, a bridge could connect the students to the buildings and to one Offices another.

Media Booth Media Booth

Media Lab

Media Booth Media Booth

Media Lab

Gallery Media Lab

Media Booth

Gallery

Media Booth

PROGRAM EDGE CONDITION

Circulation

CIRCULATION Site concept image

Circulation Program Program PROGRAM AND CIRCULATION ABSTRACT

CIRCULATION

The separation of student types and familiarity with the building

Collage superimposing the different types of students into one space connecting the campus

PROGRAM

Plan of circulations relationship with program

C-1 Studio: Space of Vision

henomenology

INITIAL DESIGN The design would attempt to bridge the two buildings in the alley. This bridge needed to be spatial. The depth of the alley was currently only being used for the ground floor. The three floors of a new media lab would multiply the density of the alley and highlight the seam that connects the two buildings. Though the building could connect people though the use of space, it could also separate people due to the lack of sunlight.

Program

Media Lab 951 Boylston Gallery 320 Newbury

Offices

Final Design

Media Booth

Media Lab

Gallery

Circulation

Program

Model of program in alley filling into the space

Media Booth

Media Lab

C-1 Studio: Space of Vision

The design quickly included a study on lightâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s ability to enter into the space.

Offices

A model to study the contrast between opaque and translucent with the connection of the two buildings with a third

Media Booth

STUDY DESIGN Filling the negative space between the buildings was a straightforward step that gave consistency to the density of the campus. The three floors and the corners of the design created zones of shadow and compression. Study models were used to examine the result of these design moves.

Circulation

Study model of plane and object Program

Model of program in bridge

A model to study the effects of translucent planes on walls and ceilings

Model of program in alley

l Design

FINAL DESIGN The final design changes the planes of the bridge to produce more edge conditions to provide moments of connection and meeting with the student body. The concept is to provide the overlapping of space from the initial image that creates moments of pause and connection.

Perspective section through the bridge

Long section

Cross section

FINAL DESIGN: DRAWINGS

Plans

Cross Sections

6th floor of 320 Newbury Street

5th floor of 320 Newbury Street

4th floor of 320 Newbury Street

3th floor of 320 Newbury Street

e old Filene's department re chain was absorbed into acy's in 2005. site

The proposed design is prompted from the current use of the city block where the project is based. As a commercial area, the Downtown Crossing district attracts people from the region to a historic shopping site that is currently being revitalized. The design is intended to open up the pedestrian access to the district as well as provide a landmark that anchors the area within the city. The design reinvents the notion that a historic place can be rebuilt with a posture of respect to the past a firm footing in the present and an eye towards the future of the inner city.

term: FALL 2009 (16 weeks) instructors: STEFAN AHLBLAD, SHAUN FRANCIS LYNCH

This urban design studio began with a site investigation. Over an eight week period, the class took up the investigation of Downtown Crossing in Boston Massachusetts as a joint study. Individual design studies followed from these observations.

c-2 studio: REINVENTING THE INNER CITY

REINVENTING THE INNER CITY

SITE STUDY This project began as a joint study of the site of Boston and itâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s downtown. The following pages show my study and compilation of the group work into my own understanding of the site both socially and spatially.

1872

3KRWR 0DS

Analysis

UHTXLUHPHQWV VWRFN QHJRWLDWLRQV DQG UDWLÂ¿FDWLRQV E\ YDULRXV SDUWLHV WKH %RVWRQ (OHYDWHG 5DLOZD\ GLG QRW Â¿QDOO\ WDNH SRVVHVVLRQ XQWLO 'HFHPEHU 7KLV VRRQ SURYHG WR EH DGYDQWDJHRXV WR WKH IXWXUH RI WKH PDVV WUDQVSRUWDWLRQ V\VWHP KHUH LQ %RVWRQ 6XEZD\ HOHYDWHG UDSLG WUDQVLW OLQHV ZHUH LQWHJUDWHG ZLWK VXUIDFH URXWHV XQGHU RQH FRRUGLQDWHG PDQDJHPHQW %XW EHIRUH WKLV FRXOG EHFRPH D IDLW DFFRPSOL D ELWWHU SUR[\ EDWWOH WRRN SODFH - 3 0RUJDQ KDG SXUFKDVHG WKH %RVWRQ (OHYDWHG 5DLOZD\Â¶V IUDQFKLVH DVVLJQLQJ LQWHUHVW WR .LGGHU 3HDERG\ DQG &RPSDQ\ ,I WKH %RVWRQ (OHYDWHG 5DLOZD\ ZDV WR EH SURÂ¿WDEOH DOO VXUIDFH DQG UDSLG WUDQVLW OLQHV KDG WR EH XQLÂ¿HG %XW WKH :HVW (QG PDQDJHPHQW XVH WR KLJK SURÂ¿WV DQG GLYLGHQGV ZDV QRW DERXW WR EH DEVRUEHG E\ DQ\RQH 1RQHWKHOHVV DW D 1RYHPEHU :HVW (QG DQQXDO PHHWLQJ D SUR[\ EDWWOH WRRN SODFH DQG WKH %RVWRQ (OHYDWHG 5DLOZD\ FDPH RXW WKH ZLQQHU

Streets: roads and alleyways were widened and more main streets were provided for evacuation and emergency vehicles.

Blocks:

many parks and green spaces that were set aside, downtown city blocks w

revamped and bought by businesses and developers to create large buil Bostonâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s formation in up 1630

buildings, set one or two to a block increased density by increasing the nu This increase in number of stories and building materials allowed for the d would provide the shadowlines of the downtown districts.

1897

$QDO\VLV

6WUHHWV

7KH FUHDWLRQ RI SXEOLF WUDQVSRUWDWLRQ LQ WKH FLW\ RI %RVWRQ ZRXOG JUHDWO\ DIIHFW WKH VWDWH RI VWUHHWV DQG DYHQXHV RI GRZQWRZQ 7KH HOHYDWHG UDLOZD\ ZRXOG EHFRPH WKH FRQQHFWRU IURP 5R[EXU\ WR WKH FHQWHU RI %RVWRQ 7KH *UHHQ OLQH ZRXOG EHFRPH WKH FRQQHFWRU IURP $OVWRQ WR GRZQWRZQ 7KHVH UDLOZD\V DOORZHG WKH GRZQWRZQ VWUHHWV WR FDUU\ PRUH SHRSOH GHQVHO\ SDFNHG WKURXJK WKH VWUHHWV RI %RVWRQ 7KH XQGHUJURXQG VXEZD\ FUHDWHG D GHSWK WR WUDQVSRUWDWLRQ DQG DQ HDVH RI WUDYHO

%ORFNV

7KH FUHDWLRQ RI SXEOLF WUDQVSRUWDWLRQ ZRXOG DIIHFW WKH FLW\ EORFNV Bostonâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s rebuilding in 1872

WKURXJK WKH SODFHPHQW RI VWDWLRQV DQG WDNLQJ DZD\ WKH QHHG WR ZLGHQ VWUHHWV 7KHVH VWDWLRQV EHFDPH D QHHGHG DGGLWLRQ WR DQ\ FLW\ QRGH ,I D EXVLQHVV QHHGHG PDQ\ FXVWRPHUV LW ZRXOG EHQLÂ¿W WKDW EXVLQHVV WR EH FHQWHUHG QHDU WKH UDLOZD\ VWDWLRQV ,I QRW IRU WKH VXEZD\ UXQQLQJ EHQHDWK WKH GRZQWRZQ FHQWHU WKH FLW\ EORFNV ZRXOG ORVH WKHLU SUHVHQFH IRU WKH QHHG RI PRUH FLUFXODWLRQ

Bostonâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s public transportation

Reinventing the In Stefan Ahlblad, Sh

QHHG IRU RSHQ SHGHVWULDQ FLUFXODWLRQV :KLOH WKH LQIUDVWUXFWXUH RI VWUHHWV GLG QRW FKDQJH WKH XSNHHS DQG LPSURYHPHQW RI VLGHZDONV DQG VWUHHW FRUQHUV ZRXOG EHFRPH D GHVLUHG FKDUDFWHULVWLF RI WKH FLW\ ,Q DGGLWLRQ WKH SODFHPHQW RI GHSDUWPHQW VWRUHV EURXJKW DQ LQÃ&#x20AC;X[ RI SHRSOH IRUP WKH JURZLQJ DUHD RI %RVWRQ WR WKH FHQWHU RI %RVWRQ 7KH PDLQ DYHQXH IRU WKLV ZDV :DVKLQJWRQ VWUHHW DQG WKH 2UDQJH /LQH RI WKH HOHYDWHG UDLOZD\

QV EHFDPH D QHHGHG DGGLWLRQ WR DQ\ FLW\ QRGH ,I PDQ\ FXVWRPHUV LW ZRXOG EHQLÂ¿W WKDW EXVLQHVV WR UDLOZD\ VWDWLRQV ,I QRW IRU WKH VXEZD\ UXQQLQJ ZQ FHQWHU WKH FLW\ EORFNV ZRXOG ORVH WKHLU G RI PRUH FLUFXODWLRQ

$QDO\VLV

6WUHHWV

,Q PRVW FDVHV ZKLOH WKH SODQ ZDV WR LQFUHDVH FLUFXODWLRQ WKH LQFUHDVH FDPH LQ SDUNLQJ ORWV DQG ZLWK D GHFUHDVH LQ VWUHHWV DQG RYHUDOO FLUFXODWLRQ $OOH\ ZD\V ZHUH GRQH DZD\ ZLWK LQ IDYRU RI SDUNV IRU KRXVLQJ SURMHFWV DQG GHYHORSPHQW SDUNV

DQG PDQXIDFWXULQJ GLVWULFW WKH GRZQWRZQ FRPPHUFLDO GLVWULFW JDLQHG LWV Ã&#x20AC;DJVKLS VWRUHV LQ WKH GHSDUWPHQW VWRUHV 7KHVH DUHDV DQFKRUHG WKH GLVWULFW ZLWK WZR IXOO EORFNV GHGLFDWHG WR FRPPHUFH

%ORFNV Bostonâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s department stores

7KH FLW\ EORFNV ZHUH GHVWUR\HG LQ WKLV VFKHPH LQ IDYRU RI GHYHORSPHQW SDUNV 7KURXJKZD\V WKDW SURYLGHG IRU SHGHVWLDQV DQG FDUV ZHUH UHPRYHG LQ IDYRU RI SDUNLQJ ORWV DQG VLGHZDONV 7KH EORFNV ORVW GHQVLW\ LQ IDYRU RI EXLOGLQJ GHQVLW\

Bostonâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s Urban Renewal in the 1960â&#x20AC;&#x2122;s

Bostonâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s business improvement districts 23

5HLQYHQWLQJ WKH ,QQHU &LW\ & 6WXGLR 6WHIDQ $KOEODG 6KDXQ )UDQFLV /\QFK

SITE STUDY

Time Period: Event

Description

Bostonâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s Founding

Time Period: Event

Description

neighboring municipalities.

Great Fire of 1872

the evening of Saturday, Nov. 9-ten minutes after an undue illumination had been discovered in the basement of the granite store on the comer of Kensington and Summer street. It was not brought under control until late afternoon the following day, and was by far the most disastrous of several great a district bounded by Summer, Washington, Milk, and Broad Streets. The total number of buildings that fell victim to the

The most intense reclamation efforts were in the 1800s. Beginning in 1807, the crown of Beacon Triangle Gust south of today's North Station area). The present-day State House sits atop this shortened

Before permits were gained for the erections of prominent buildings, the city authorities had the insight to straighten and Boston to be widened, seventeen streets have been widened with four extended. Particularly Congress Street, Federal

areas now known as the South End, West End, Financial District, and Chinatown.

Atlantic Avenue. After The most dramatic Almost six hundred acres (240 hectares) of Needham Heights. Boston also grew by annexing the adjacent communities of East Boston, Roxbury, Dorchester, West Roxbury (including Jamaica Plain and Roslindale), South Boston, Brighton, Allston, Hyde Park, and Charlestown, some of which were also

Photo/ Map

Analysis

Photo/ Map

1872 Streets:

With the exception of the main thoroughfair, Washington Street, most streets and avenues were based upon the historic placements of cart paths. These areas were widened through piecemeal efforts of the city. The result is an improvisational network of streets and alleyways

Blocks:

The city blocks of Boston evolved from the founding of a rural harbor town. Plots of land with a house and surrounding farmland became a block of row houses of displacement of the hills to provide for more land, Boston city blocks were over crowded and under planned.

Analysis

Streets: roads and alleyways were widened and more main streets were provided for evacuation and emergency vehicles.

Blocks: many parks and green spaces that were set aside, downtown city blocks were completely revamped and bought up by businesses and developers to create large buildings. These buildings, set one or two to a block increased density by increasing the number of stories. This increase in number of stories and building materials allowed for the development that would provide the shadowlines of the downtown districts.

1630 Reinventing the Inner City: C-2 Studio Stefan Ahlblad, Shaun Francis Lynch

7LPH 3HULRG (YHQW

7KH 5LVH RI 3XEOLF 7UDQVSRUWDWLRQ

7LPH 3HULRG (YHQW

7KH 5LVH RI 'HSDUWPHQW 6WRUHV

'HVFULSWLRQ

7KH GHFLVLRQ ZDV PDGH WR HOHFWULI\ DOO RI WKH :HVW (QG 6WUHHW 5DLOZD\ URXWHV 7KXV WKH %RVWRQ V\VWHP ZDV RQH RI WKH SLRQHHUV LQ VWUHHW UDLOZD\ WRWDO V\VWHP HOHFWULÂ¿FDWLRQ RQ D ODUJH VFDOH PHWURSROLWDQ EDVLV %DVHG RQ WKH VXFFHVV KHUH LQ %RVWRQ PDQ\ RI $PHULFDÂ¶V ODUJHU VWUHHW UDLOZD\ V\VWHPV FRQYHUWHG WR HOHFWULÂ¿FDWLRQ %RVWRQ KDG OHG WKH ZD\ IRU RWKHU FLWLHV WR IROORZ 7KH Â¿UVW HOHFWULF VWUHHWFDU OLQH KHUH LQ WKH Â³+XEÂ´ EHJDQ RSHUDWLRQ RQ -DQXDU\ VWDUWLQJ IURP WKH $OOVWRQ 5DLOURDG 'HSRW XS +DUYDUG $YHQXH OHIW DW &RROLGJH &RUQHU WR %RVWRQÂ¶V 3DUN 6TXDUH 7KH SUHVHQW 0%7$Â¶V *UHHQ /LQH %HDFRQ 6WUHHW ZDV SDUW RI WKLV Â¿UVW LQVWDOODWLRQ 2Q 'HFHPEHU XQGHU WKH VXSHUYLVLRQ RI WKH 7UDQVLW &RPPLVVLRQ D OHDVH ZDV HQWHUHG LQWR ZLWK WKH :HVW (QG 6WUHHW 5DLOZD\ E\ ZKLFK WKH SURSHUW\ RI WKDW FRPSDQ\ ZDV OHDVHG WR WKH %RVWRQ (OHYDWHG 5DLOZD\ &RPSDQ\ IRU D WHUP RI WZHQW\ IRXU \HDUV HLJKW PRQWKV DQG QLQH GD\V IURP 2FWREHU %HFDXVH RI OHJDOLWLHV OHDVH UHTXLUHPHQWV VWRFN QHJRWLDWLRQV DQG UDWLÂ¿FDWLRQV E\ YDULRXV SDUWLHV WKH %RVWRQ (OHYDWHG 5DLOZD\ GLG QRW Â¿QDOO\ WDNH SRVVHVVLRQ XQWLO 'HFHPEHU 7KLV VRRQ SURYHG WR EH DGYDQWDJHRXV WR WKH IXWXUH RI WKH PDVV WUDQVSRUWDWLRQ V\VWHP KHUH LQ %RVWRQ 6XEZD\ HOHYDWHG UDSLG WUDQVLW OLQHV ZHUH LQWHJUDWHG ZLWK VXUIDFH URXWHV XQGHU RQH FRRUGLQDWHG PDQDJHPHQW %XW EHIRUH WKLV FRXOG EHFRPH D IDLW DFFRPSOL D ELWWHU SUR[\ EDWWOH WRRN SODFH - 3 0RUJDQ KDG SXUFKDVHG WKH %RVWRQ (OHYDWHG 5DLOZD\Â¶V IUDQFKLVH DVVLJQLQJ LQWHUHVW WR .LGGHU 3HDERG\ DQG &RPSDQ\ ,I WKH %RVWRQ (OHYDWHG 5DLOZD\ ZDV WR EH SURÂ¿WDEOH DOO VXUIDFH DQG UDSLG WUDQVLW OLQHV KDG WR EH XQLÂ¿HG %XW WKH :HVW (QG PDQDJHPHQW XVH WR KLJK SURÂ¿WV DQG GLYLGHQGV ZDV QRW DERXW WR EH DEVRUEHG E\ DQ\RQH 1RQHWKHOHVV DW D 1RYHPEHU :HVW (QG DQQXDO PHHWLQJ D SUR[\ EDWWOH WRRN SODFH DQG WKH %RVWRQ (OHYDWHG 5DLOZD\ FDPH RXW WKH ZLQQHU

'HVFULSWLRQ

)LOHQHÂ¶V ZDV D IDPRXV GHSDUWPHQW VWRUH FKDLQ WKDW ZDV HVWDEOLVKHG DW %RVWRQ LQ )LOHQHÂ¶V FRQVWUXFWHG D YHU\ DWWUDFWLYH EXLOGLQJ DW :DVKLQJWRQ 6WUHHW ZKLFK EHFDPH WKHLU Ã&#x20AC;DJVKLS VWRUH 7KH VWRUH RSHQHG LWV GRRUV WR WKH SXEOLF IRU WKH Â¿UVW WLPH LQ WKLV QHZ KRPH RQ 6HSWHPEHU 'HPROLVKPHQW RI VHYHUDO EXLOGLQJV RQ :DVKLQJWRQ 6XPPHU DQG +DZOH\ 6WUHHWV EHJDQ RQ 2FWREHU DQG WKH QHZ )LOHQHÂ¶V EXLOGLQJ ZDV FRQVWUXFWHG LQ MXVW PRQWKV RU PRQWKV IURP VWDUW WR Â¿QLVK 7KLV PRGHUQ GHSDUWPHQW VWRUH EXLOGLQJ FRQWDLQHG PDQ\ VSHFLDOW\ VKRSV ZLWK VHUYLFHV VXFK DV KDLUGUHVVLQJ PDQLFXULQJ DQG SHGLFXULQJ IRU ZRPHQ D IXOO VHUYLFH EDUEHU VKRS IRU PHQ D UHVWDXUDQW WHD URRP DQG FDIH RQ WKH WRS Ã&#x20AC;RRU D VRGD IRXQWDLQ DQG OXQFK URRP LQ WKH EDVHPHQW EDWKV IRU RXW RI WRZQ YLVLWRUV DQG WKH IDPRXV VXEZD\ HQWUDQFH LQWR WKH $XWRPDWLF %DUJDLQ %DVHPHQW

1912

3KRWR 0DS

1897

$QDO\VLV

6WUHHWV

$QDO\VLV

%ORFNV

7KH FUHDWLRQ RI SXEOLF WUDQVSRUWDWLRQ ZRXOG DIIHFW WKH FLW\ EORFNV WKURXJK WKH SODFHPHQW RI VWDWLRQV DQG WDNLQJ DZD\ WKH QHHG WR ZLGHQ VWUHHWV 7KHVH VWDWLRQV EHFDPH D QHHGHG DGGLWLRQ WR DQ\ FLW\ QRGH ,I D EXVLQHVV QHHGHG PDQ\ FXVWRPHUV LW ZRXOG EHQLÂ¿W WKDW EXVLQHVV WR EH FHQWHUHG QHDU WKH UDLOZD\ VWDWLRQV ,I QRW IRU WKH VXEZD\ UXQQLQJ EHQHDWK WKH GRZQWRZQ FHQWHU WKH FLW\ EORFNV ZRXOG ORVH WKHLU SUHVHQFH IRU WKH QHHG RI PRUH FLUFXODWLRQ

6WUHHWV

7KH ERRP RI GHSDUWPHQW VWRUHV SURYLGHG WKH QHHG IRU SHGHVWULDQ ZDONZD\V 7KH VWRUH IURQW GHVLJQ RI VKRSV DQG WKH GHSDUWPHQW VWRUHV QHHG IRU RSHQ SHGHVWULDQ FLUFXODWLRQV :KLOH WKH LQIUDVWUXFWXUH RI VWUHHWV GLG QRW FKDQJH WKH XSNHHS DQG LPSURYHPHQW RI VLGHZDONV DQG VWUHHW FRUQHUV ZRXOG EHFRPH D GHVLUHG FKDUDFWHULVWLF RI WKH FLW\ ,Q DGGLWLRQ WKH SODFHPHQW RI GHSDUWPHQW VWRUHV EURXJKW DQ LQÃ&#x20AC;X[ RI SHRSOH IRUP WKH JURZLQJ DUHD RI %RVWRQ WR WKH FHQWHU RI %RVWRQ 7KH PDLQ DYHQXH IRU WKLV ZDV :DVKLQJWRQ VWUHHW DQG WKH 2UDQJH /LQH RI WKH HOHYDWHG UDLOZD\

%ORFNV

7KH GHSDUWPHQW VWRUHV QHHGHG PDVVLYH VSDFH WR FUHDWH WKHVH FHQWUDO VKRSSLQJ GLVWULFWV 3ODFHG RQ WKH LQWHUVHFWLRQ RI WKH Â¿QDQFLDO JRYHUQPHQW DQG PDQXIDFWXULQJ GLVWULFW WKH GRZQWRZQ FRPPHUFLDO GLVWULFW JDLQHG LWV Ã&#x20AC;DJVKLS VWRUHV LQ WKH GHSDUWPHQW VWRUHV 7KHVH DUHDV DQFKRUHG WKH GLVWULFW ZLWK WZR IXOO EORFNV GHGLFDWHG WR FRPPHUFH

5HLQYHQWLQJ WKH ,QQHU &LW\ & 6WXGLR 6WHIDQ $KOEODG 6KDXQ )UDQFLV /\QFK

7LPH 3HULRG (YHQW

Â¶V 8UEDQ 5HQHZDO

7LPH 3HULRG (YHQW

%XVLQHVV ,PSURYHPHQW 'LVWULFWV %,'

'HVFULSWLRQ

7KH &LW\ RI %RVWRQ XQGHUZHQW 8UEDQ 5HQHZDO LQ WKH Â¶V DQG Â¶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

'HVFULSWLRQ

%RVWRQ 5HGHYHORSPHQW $XWKRULW\ XQGHUWRRN D QHZ VFKHPH UHFHQWO\ WR LPSURYH FLW\ GLVWULFWV HQGDQJHU RI HFRQRPLF GHFOLQH $ EXVLQHVV LPSURYHPHQW GLVWULFW %,' LV D SXEOLF SULYDWH SDUWQHUVKLS LQ ZKLFK EXVLQHVVHV LQ D GHÂ¿QHG DUHD SD\ DQ DGGLWLRQDO WD[ RU IHH LQ RUGHU WR IXQG LPSURYHPHQWV ZLWKLQ WKH GLVWULFWÂ¶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

1960

3KRWR 0DS

2005 $QDO\VLV

6WUHHWV

%ORFNV

$QDO\VLV

6WUHHWV

7KLV SODQ PLJKW GHFUHDVH WKH QXPEHU DQG H[WHQW RI SHGHVWULDQ RQO\ ZDONZD\V +RZHYHU WKH XSNHHS IRU WKH SHGHVWULDQ DQG YHKLFXODU WUDIÂ¿F ZD\V ZRXOG KDYH UHJXODU XSNHHS IURP WKH SULYDWH RZQHUV RI WKH VXUURXQGLQJ DUHD

%ORFNV

7KH FLW\ EORFNV XQGHU WKH %,' FUHDWH KLJK GHQVLW\ IRU SURÂ¿W ZKLFK UHPRYHV WKH ]RQLQJ UHVWUDLQWV IRU FHUWDLQ H[FKDQJHV 7KH )$5 OLPLWV DUH UHPRYHG FDXVLQJ OHVV OLJKW EXW SXEOLF VSDFHV DUH SURYLGHG ZLWKLQ WKH VSDFH DQG QHDUE\ GHYHORSPHQW SDUNV

5HLQYHQWLQJ WKH ,QQHU &LW\ & 6WXGLR 6WHIDQ $KOEODG 6KDXQ )UDQFLV /\QFK

My concept of the site included an understanding of how the downtown needed a design that was design for the larger scale of the urban fabric but that also connected all points of interest and circulation into one hub of activity. I believe Downtown Crossing could be that center of activity.

U Urban Renewal

Bostonâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s Founding

Urban Renewal Public Transportation

Public Transportation Business Improvement District Department Store

B F

P T

B Im D

G 1

Great Fire of 1872

Department Store

Business Improvement District

Great Fire of SITE CONCEPT 1872

8AM

Sadly, with the failure of the current project, the heart of this downtown is empty. Availability This failure provides an opportunityLight to bring together the ideas of scale, pedestrian use, and 8AM commerce into one building that can connect the Boston’s district. 4PM

12PM

8AM

Founding

4PM

Traffic Patterns Commercial District

Financial District

Green Space

Restaraunt

Grocery/ Convienience

Urban Renewal Public Transportation

Department Store

Station Presence

Business Improvement District

ANALYSIS Above Ground Vehicular Traﬃc

Pedestrian Zone

Urban Renewal T Routes Red Line

Orange Line

Silver Line

Boston’s Founding

Public Transportation MBTA Presence

Business Improvement District Department Store The goals and restraints of the design Great Fire of

Building shadow

Pedestiran Walkway Greenspace

DESIGN CONCEPT The initial design idea was to create both a transportation hub; including a metro station, an urban mall; similar to the covered glass atria of 19th Century France, and a commercial tower; that builds upon the areas past history and future goals.

Ground Floor plan

Initial Sketch of new building connecting with old

Existing Building

Initial Sketch

Metro Stationâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s footprint

29 Initial Sketch of pedestrians and shoppers

DESIGN MODELS The scheme for how a design could accomplish these goals would attempt to carry both options; to make visible volumes that were dominant to the skyline, while making the central space open and dominant to the pedestrian and visitor. The design process included many iterations and trails of form.

DESIGN FORM The metro center is a protective bunker that acknowledges the dangers of urban centers, but it also creates an openness to allow daylight into the center of the station.

FINAL DESIGN The final design scheme unifies two volumes into one form that creates an arch to symbolize both an entry and the endurance of the cityâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s center.

Schematic Model: Northern View

Schematic Model: City context

commercial office space

hotel and high end restaurants

restaurants and retail stores

Illustrations of program and scale

Physical model in site model

Plans and sections of the final design

The start of the design was to analyze the animals that would stay at the zoo. Beginning with one animal, the zoo design fit the requirements of housing for that specific case. The design was then expanded to include multiple species that vary in scale resulting in a design that would need to apply to each. This resulted in a form that would fit all of the animals.

term: SPRING 2010 (16 weeks) instructor: KELLY JEAN ARD

This studio was based on the premise of an urban zoo situated on the Rose Kennedy Greenway. The goal was to focus on the small, medium, and large, scale in both program elements and designing the large form and the detail. The end result would be a design that can define a spectacle.

c-2 studio: GENERATING THE SPECTACLE

GENERATING THE SPECTACLE

ZOO ANIMAL(S)

SITE The beginning of this project examined the whole of the Greenway and isolated three potential sites for the zoo. The bobcat was the inspiration for this project and so the physical requirements for space pushed the design to take up three blocks of the park.

.02 mi.

Ways to shape space and control circulation

Darker areas represent noise and congestion

SITE

The site then developed from a series of sketches and iterations of form, space, texture, program, and moments of intersections applied onto canvas. This development was then distilled out into possible solutions for building floors.

Initial site plan

Ground Floor Template

3-6 Floor Template

2nd Floor Template

Site study

PROGRAM The understanding of the program changed with the addition of new animals to be house at the zoo. The idea of housing a bobcat developed into creating a place for the bobcat to prowl and roam. With the addition of competition and of prey, the zoo could turn into habitat for the animals with opportunities for life and death.

RABBIT

BOBCAT

The space requirements, the need to animal dens where the prey was protected as well as hunting areas where the prey was exposed became an issue of design. The zoo would need to be built up vertically to house all of this space for animals to live and die in a natural process.

BOBCAT

WOLF

DEER

WOLF

VULTURE

DEER

Animals and their habitat space

Site study condensed into three dimensions Animals and their habitat space within the design

Exploring the movement of space through section

SITE STUDY The design then developed from a series of sketches and iterations of form, space, texture, program, and moments of intersections applied into a model. This development was then built upon with iterations of paper forms that would relate to the site.

Final sketch site model

Generative form model

BUILDING IN PLAN After generating the design in rough terms, the opportunity to design in plan was drastically different and allowed for more detail to be added and thought concerning circulation systems and how the animals would meet or avoid each other.

3-6 Floor: Den, and hunting areas for wolves and bobcats

2nd Floor: Grazing area for deer and rabbits, start of stalking area for bobcats

45 Ground Floor: Den area for deer and rabbits

The entrance lobby was studied at 1/4â&#x20AC;? scale to develop the space design as it included structure, stark concrete walls, and screens

Callout of Level 1 1/8" = 1'-0"

Callout (2) of Level 1 1/2" = 1'-0"

Copy of Level 5 1" = 60'-0"

After working at such a large scale, the floor plates were developed in plan to the same level of detail.

Copy of Level 4 1" = 60'-0"

Office 1 8

Ele vatio n4

DN DN

-a -

1Ele vatio n2

A117

Copy of Level 3 1" = 60'-0"

- Ele vatio n3

-a

Copy of Level 6 1" = 60'-0"

DN DN UP UP

Copy of Level 2 1" = 60'-0"

Copy of Level 5 1" = 60'-0"

Copy of Level 4 1" = 60'-0"

UP UP DN

Roof 144' - 0"

Copy of Level 1 1" = 60'-0"

Level 6 120' - 0"

Level 5 96' - 0"

UP UP

Level 4 72' - 0"

Office 1

Tickets UP

Level 3 48' - 0"

Level 2 24' - 0"

DN DN

Copy of Lower Level 1" = 60'-0"

Level 1 0' - 0" Lower Level -10' - 0" 1

Elevation 2 - a 1" = 20'-0"

Structural system of the zoo Copy of Level 3 4 1" = 60'-0"

BUILDING IN SECTION From plan, the design developed further in section. I attempted to make this a large airy space that wouldnâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;t seem to confine the animals but rather give them enough space the live naturally. This desire resulted in 20â&#x20AC;&#x2122; high plate and triple high spaces that could expand the space. Space also create opportunities for changing roles of hunter and hunted. Is the visitor to the zoo spying on the bobcat? Or is it the bobcat that is spying on the visitor? Does the doe see the wolf before the wolf can see it? I wanted these moments of drama to play out within the space of the zoo.

BUILDING INTERIOR PERSPECTIVES GALLERY INTERIOR

ZOO EXHIBIT INTERIOR

BUILDING EXTERIOR PERSPECTIVES

ATIONS

The studio began with the interpretation of â&#x20AC;&#x153;Sonnets to Orpheusâ&#x20AC;? by Rainer Maria Rilke. The study of the poem injected a depth of meaning into the design and initiated the design process. The next step was to investigate precedents for chapels, crematoria, and buildings using concrete. These influences were then brought along as the studio investigate the site of Mt. Auburn Cemetery. Finally a design of a crematorium and chapel was developed to meet the program requirements, site opportunities, and the poetic interpretations of the poem.

term: FALL 2010 (16 weeks) instructor: KEVIN LASSO

What is the impetus for a design? Is it the site? Is it the program? Is it the building material? In this study, the program, site, and material were all predetermined.

c-2 studio: CONCRETE THINKING

CONCRETE THINKING

ONS

“Only when a pure destination outweighs childish pride in what an engine can do, will someonenear the culmination of victory- lay distance asside and be what solitarily flew.” par -Sonnets to Orphe

INSPIRATION “Sonnets to Orpheus” by Rainer Maria Rilke provided the initial inspiration to begin thinking in the abstract and developing thoughts to images. As part of the exercise, lines from the poem were interpreted visually.

C-2 Concrete Thinking VISUAL INTERPRETATIONS Instructor: Kevin Losso Spaces Between 2 Sweet Meander Critique out Final our paths for sweet meander but draw them straight.” part one, number 24

Lines Straight

an and a man when she avoids him. She loves him yet keeps him our of range” part two, number 20 “We don’t lay out our paths for sweet meander but draw them straight.” part one, number 24 “How many spansthe between a woman and a of manvictorywhen she avoids She loves him yet keeps himbe our of range”solitarily part two, number 20” part one, number 23 engine can do, will someonenear culmination lay him. distance asside and what flew. “Only when a pure destination outweighs childish pride in what an engine can do, will someonenear the culmination of victory- lay distance asside and be what solitarily flew.” part one, number 23 -Sonnets to-Sonnets Orpheus bybyRainer Maria to Orpheus Rainer Maria Rilke Ril

VISUAL INTERPRETATIONS

Solitarily Flew

Spaces Between 1

PRECEDENTS An initial precedent study included gathering images of famous buildings or noted works by others. Images of morning or funeral processions were also included to influence the final design.

PRECEDENTS PRECEDENTS After collecting the images, they were superimposed on one another to create a screening effect that would blur the distinct works and rather impose ideas of spaces. Themes of ruins, holy spaces, processions, and gateways stood out in the final blurring of lines. The method of working created a continuity of process between visual interpretations and the precedent study.

The second week of precedent study was used to capture images of buildings and chapels around Boston as an attempt to glean regional context to be applied to the site in Mt. Auburn.

SITE STUDY The original narrative of the site provided inspiration for this project. The site is located where there is an existing chapel and crematorium on a hill in the cemetery. As the given narrative explains, the chapel is destroyed as a result of a fire and a new chapel is being designed in its place. Elements of the existing chapel can be reused and redesigned. The wear of the stone and the infusion of the natural vegetation upon the stone and concrete were elements that I wanted to retain in the new design of the chapel.

Elements of the existing chapel:

The stone columns and towers

The column base

The concrete path on the North side of the chapel

The grading will be maintained for the majority of the site.

Site study collage 61

DESIGN DEVELOPMENT The site interpretation: The site of the Bigelow Chapel and Crematory was destroyed by a fire leaving only the stone and concrete elements that were free standing including the columns and the access way to the north. These elements will be incorporated into the new chapel design.

The stone columns and towers standing out in the new design

Floor plan development

The design process began with using the remaining pillars and anchors to arrange the site. After the site plan was established the design continued underground to house the program while above ground would be a walking garden where the remains of the chapel would act as a memorial or headstone of the new chapel.

Initial entry sketch

Initial site sketch

Developed site plan

Initial design modeling

PROGRAMMING As the design developed, it was necessary to have different levels for the main chapel space and for the crematorium. The â&#x20AC;&#x153;space betweenâ&#x20AC;? became a distinct feature of the design that was represented in the roof top garden above the chapel as well as surrounding the main chapel space and separating the crematorium program from the chapel.

Floor plan development

DESIGN DEVELOPMENT: SECTIONS By designing through section, the design ideas of providing space between spaces for reflection and perspective becomes more clear.

Floor plan sketch with the development of levels

Progressive cross sections through building 65

Progressive long sections through building

FINAL DESIGN The final design clarified the accessibility route and the distinct characteristics of the program spaces. The new chapel is a memorial to the process of cremation and is set within the site to not overpower the emotions of the visitors.

The utility entrance and ramp down

The visitors entrance on both ends of the chapel

The visitors entrance to the remembrance garden

The structure of the chapel and crematorium

The hallway beside the chapel

INTERIOR RENDERINGS

Public entrance into the chapel

Office and support space in side hall

Interior view of chapel: looking North

Main door to chapel

Crematorium retort space

Accessible route into the chapel

Utility entrance for crematorium

Interior view of chapel: looking South

Accessible route into the chapel

The roof garden above the chapel with skylights and green space

The pages that follow present work through three special projects organized through the BAC Practice department. Presented in chronological order: Fall 2009 - Spring 2010: Hale Reservation: Westwood, MA Fall 2010: Fieldâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s Corner Library: Dorchester, MA Fall 2010 - Spring 2011: Evolo Skyscraper Competition: Chicago, IL

SECTION 2

practice: SPECIAL PROJECTS

Special Projects Work

term: FALL 2009 - SPRING 2010 (32 weeks) instructor: GABE BERGERON

The Special Project of Hale Reservation is a rural project located in Westwood, MA. The client was Hale reservation and they wanted the design team to rethink and redesign their current Cucchiera Learning Center. This Center included a butterfly garden, apple orchard, learning barn, and maintenance facility.

special projects: HALE RESERVATION

HALE RESERVATION

HALE RESERVATION: a site in conflict USER GROUPS

NEEDS

Hale Reservation: Executive Director: Eric Arnold Project Manager: Bob Fallen Facilities Director: Robert Parr Board of Directors Education Department: Education Director: Adrienne Farfalla Director of Programs: Steve Larsen Educator: Jay Walsh

A cohesive site that accommodates all of the user groups as the design conforms to budget and Hale Reservation’s character.

Cucchiara Family: Vin Cucchiara Michael Cucchiara Fox Hill Garden Club: Beth Benjamin Janet Reynolds North Cunningham DESIGN TEAM Director of Special Projects: Gabriel Bergeron Designer: John Futey II (M. Arch program, B.S Environmental Planning and Design) Designer: Joshua Swasey (M. Arch program) Designer: Darian Mason (M. Arch program)

INITIAL CLIENT MEETING AND INTERVIEW

A maintenance complex that holds the workshops and vehicles needed to run the facilities. Also including offices and storage space. A site that is well drained with available water and electricity.

Orchard group’s input

A center of operations that allows students to be dropped off, stow their personal belongings , and learn and interact with the site. Paths and vistas through which students can explore and learn about the site without disrupting natural habitats. Removing the dumping area as a distraction. An orchard that has a defined perimeter; with invasive species and boulders removed. A connection to the butterfly garden and a viewing rock. A site that retains its tranquil character. A site that can be easily maintained. Removing the dumping area as a distraction and pollutant. A garden in the woods. A site that can be easily maintained. A habitat for the butterflies. Removing of the distraction and eyesore of the dumping site. A wind shield of shrubs and choke cherries.

Site’s orchard history

Education group’s input

SITE STUDY AND ANALYSIS

Regional

Site space plan

Town

From Meadow

From Maintenance

From Parking Area

Site

Hale Reservation Conceptual Design

With information from initial site analysis and a meeting with the board, the team was able to move forward into the design phase, which started with concepts sketches that portrayed the relationships between the programs. With four distinct programs, Education, Butterfly, Orchard, and Maintenance, their overlap and edges were important to understand. Each group had their individual concerns; however they all shared a concern for harmony among the programs within the site. Concepts for design included edges, grafting, and Man versus Nature. By Joshua Swasey

Each group member worked through several schemes and used workshops together to flush out the best ideas.

Edge Analysis By Joshua Swasey

Design Team brainstorming

By Joshua Swasey

Design Team brainstorming

These design schemes show the different approaches of the team members as to how to connect or separate the programmatic elements of the site.

Butterfly

Orchard

Maintenance

Maintenance SK-1

Separation SK2

Maintenance SK-2

Partial Inclusion

By Joshua Swasey

Maintenance SK-3 By Darian Mason

79 Total Inclusion

By John Futey II

DESIGN DEVELOPMENT The following drawings are my own: Each member of the design team was responsible for creating initial schemes to present to the clients. After they gave us their preferences, we then developed two variations of what they wanted to give them the most choices and to clarify how they wanted the project to develop. The debate centered around how connected they wanted the maintenance facility to the learning center. By Terrance Duffy

CADD rendering of site with new maintenance facility

Oblique renderings of maintenance facility

By Darian Mason

DROP OFF PARKING

MATERIALS STORAGE

HEATED GARAGE WORKSHOP BATH

TURN AROUND

UNHEATED GARAGE FUEL STORAGE

BATH STORAGE DRIVE-UP PARKING OFFICE GOLF CART

81 By Darian Mason

SUSTAINABLE DESIGN In addition to architectural elements, program, and site design, the clients were very concerned with sustainable design and saving energy to keep the project as cost effective as possible. Joshua Swasey presented the sustainable design techniques while Terrance Duffy sketched the site design techniques and sections.

STRATsGIsS Shed Roof s sfsssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss s s ssssssssss s ssssssssssssssssssssssssss

s Saltbox Roof s sfssssssssssssssssssssssssssss s sfssssssssssssss

s Structural Insulated Panels s ssssssssssssssssssssssss s sssssssssssssssssssssssss s s sssssssssss s ssssssssssssss

Ssss SfsAR UTIsIZssfsfTfffsTAICsfANssSsTfsFUssYs s ffWsRsMAINTsNANCssWfRKSsffs s sTfTAsssfAss=s7s5KWsssxs=s8sfANssS s sTfTAssCfSTs(bssssssssbssssss)s=s$50,000 s sfAYBACKsfsRIfss=s10s15sYsARSs(ssssssssss s s ssssssss)

SfsARssfMsSTICssfTsWATsRsSYSTsMs s TfsfRffIsssFUssssfTsWATsR s ssMANss s s50sGAssfNsSTfRAGssTANK s sTfTAssCfSTs(bssssssssbssssss)s=s$5,500 s fAYBACKsfsRIfss=s7s9sYsARSs

STRATsGIsS

fTfffsTAICsfANssSsTfsFUssYs sMAINTsNANCssWfRKSsffs sfAss=s7s5KWsssxs=s8sfANssS CfSTs(bssssssssbssssss)s=s$50,000 CKsfsRIfss=s10s15sYsARSs(ssssssssss sssss)

ssATING

CffsING

SfsARsCfsssCTIfN SUNsSsAsING NATURAsssIGsTING

SfsARsCfsssCTIfN SUNsSsAsING fASSIfssSfsAR

$5,500

sGIsS

TssRMAssMASSsFsffRsSfAKSsUfsTsssssATsfFsTssssAYsANs s SsfWsYsRsssASsSsITsffsRsNIGsTs s ssRssUCsSssNsRGYsCfNSUMfTIfN s sTssRMAssMASSsISssASIsYsUTIsIZsss(ss:sssssssss,ssssss,sss) SUNsSsAsINGsBsfCKSsSUNssURINGsSUMMsRsWssNsTsssANGsss s ISsSTssf,sBUTsAssfWSsWINTsRsSUNsTfssNTsRs SUNsSsssFsAsSfsUTIsIZsss SUNsSsssFsAsSfsUTIsIZsssTfssNCfURAGssINFIsTRATIfNsfF s NATURAsssIGsTs

ffsRABssssfUfsRSsAssfWsFRsSssAIRsTfsFsfWsINTfsBUIssING s fRfMfTINGsNATURAssCIRCUsATIfNs ffSITIfNsssfNsSfUTssFACINGsFACAsssTfsfRsfsNTs s ffsRssATINGsINsTsssSUMMsRs WfRKsINsCfNJUNCTIfNsWITssCssRsSTfRYsWINsfWSs

d Roof sfsssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssss

tbox Roof sfssssssssssssssssssssssssssss sfssssssssssssss

ructural Insulated Panels ssssssssssssssssssssssss sssssssssssssssssssssssss s sssssssssss ssssssssssssss

STRUCTURAssINSUsATsssfANssSsARssMfsUsARsUNITSsTsATsAssfWs s FfRssASYsANssCfSTssFFICIsNTsCfSNTRUCTIfNs sIGssTssRMAsssANssINFIsTRATIfNsRsSISTANCss sfWssIFs-TIMsssNfIRfNMsNTAssIMfACTsfSssSTICKsFRAMss s CfNSTRUCTIfNs sssssQUAsIFIsss

TAKssAsfANTAGssfFsSTACKssFFsCTsTfsNATURAssYsfsNTIsATss s STRUCTURss NfsAssITIfNAsssNsRGYsINfUTsNsCsSSARYs sNSURsSsFRsSssAIRssssIfsRYsTfsfCCUfIsssSfACss

FINAL DESIGN The final design was drawn by John Futey, the final model was completed by the design team. The program and site design brought the disparate program elements together in close proximity but with design features that allowed them to coexist.

By John Futey II

By Design Team

By John Futey II

My concept is based on the idea of a That favorite ledge next to the windo in. It is a small space, a welcoming pl light and a view outside.

Through this process we researched the building limitations and code requirements of Dorchester as well as the site context. The design team met with My Lam present the design progress and then to show the final design based on his feedback. From meeting and speaking with the developer, the design team learned that the development would need many more units than we were expecting. As a result the design changed as we attempted to balance the need for multiple units and the desire to provide spacious living areas on a small lot. Design Team: Darian Mason Nway Oo Christopher McIntosh Christopher Gosnell

LIBRARY term: FALL 2010 - SPRING 2011 (20weeks) instructor: JOHN MALNATI, BERTON BREMER

The Special Project of Fields Corner Library is an urban project located in Dorchester, MA. The client was My Lam of Vietnamese American Initiative for Development, Inc.. They wanted the design team to re-imagine the library as a mixed use building that could include apartments.

special projects: FIELDS CORNER

FIELDS CORNER LIBRARY

146.24’

Preliminary Site Study Existing Site Conditions

arc length 25.95’

Development zone in Dorchester

48 .94’

library site limits current parking area

60.00’

FIELD'S CORNER LIBRARY Dorchester, MA

151.57’

Existing site context

Existing parcel documents By Chris McIntosh

Panorama along Dorchester Avenue

A2 BOSTON ARCHITECTURAL COLLEGE

SPECIAL PROJECTS

FIELDS CORNER LIBRARY

FIELD'S CORNER LIBRARY Dorchester, MA Preliminary Site Study Existing Building Documentation

Existing Fields Corner Library drafted from original drawings

Existing Fields Corner Library plans

Existing Site

91 BOSTON ARCHITECTURAL COLLEGE

SPECIAL PROJECTS

A1 BOSTON ARCHITECTURAL COLLEGE FIELDS CORNER LIBRARY

SPECIAL PROJECTS

By Darian FIELDS CORNER LIBRARYMason

FIELD'S CORNER LIBRARY Dorchester, MA Space Planning Options Site and Program Relationship

Space plan with two bedroom units

Space plan with two and three bedroom units

By Darian Mason BOSTON ARCHITECTURAL COLLEGE

SPECIAL PROJECTS

FIELDS CORNER LIBRARY

FIELD'S CORNER LIBRARY Dorchester, MA Space Planning Options Program Options and Details Resident Hall Egress Stair

Egress Stair Elevator

Open Space

2 Bedroom Unit

3 Bedroom Unit Utility Space Library Program

Condo Program

Rental Unit Option1 Program

Resident and Visitor Hallway

Egress Stair

Rental Unit Option 2 Program

Egress Stair

Library Program

By Darian Mason 93

BOSTON ARCHITECTURAL COLLEGE

SPECIAL PROJECTS

FIELDS CORNER LIBRARY

FIELD'S CORNER LIBRARY Dorchester, MA

After the first attempt of arranging the design base on space planning and meeting the program requirements, the design team created numerous iterations of schematic schemes and concepts. Each team member presented a board of designs to the clients.

Schematic Concepts Design Options

BOSTON ARCHITECTURAL COLLEGE

SPECIAL PROJECTS

By Darian Mason

FIELDS CORNER LIBRARY

DESIGN CONCEPT The final design was based on my design concept of a reading nook. I wanted to design each unit as its own cozy space that would provide light and a place to sit for each occupant of the apartments. Since the design was constrained by site and program, the solution needed to embrace the constraints and create a small, but welcoming place with plenty of light and views to the outside.

By Darian Mason By Darian Mason My concept is based on the idea of a cozy reading place. That favorite ledge next to the window that draws you in. It is a small space, a welcoming place, with plenty of light and a view outside.

By Darian Mason

FINAL DESIGN The team then developed this design in renderings and floor plans to give to the developer. In developing these plans, we researched graphic standards and relied on the teams work experience to plan out the library space and the units to meet accessibility requirements.

Rendering by Nway Oo

Library Plan by Jason Hayes

Units plans by Chris Gosnell

Rendering by Aaron Anderson

I entered this competition with a team that had already been formed and progressed in the design stage. My part in the design process was to help in the design development and creating enticing renderings for the final product. Waterbridge Tower Chicago Project Team: Aaron Anderson, Student, the Boston Architectural College Ryan Hunter, Student, the Boston Architectural College Darian Mason, Student, the Boston Architectural College Mark Allison, Architect, Adjunct Faculty Member, Boston Architectural College

101

COMPETITION term: FALL 2010 - SPRING 2011 (6 weeks) instructor: MARK ALLISON

Evolo has sponsored an annual skyscraper competition for many years. The challenge of this project was to design a theoretical skyscraper that is creative and presents an original idea. Besides having the creative idea, the presentation must be clean and interesting.

special projects: EVOLO SKYSCRAPER

EVOLO SKYSCRAPER COMPETITION

CONCEPTUAL DESIGN Walking in on the design a month into the process, the plan and program and form, was mostly decided upon. The manner in which the final form and program would be resolved was still to be determined. The plan of the skyscraper was to take up ten square block in Chicago. The form was decidedly mountainous with smooth curvilinear features. The program was to be a mix of futuristic mountainside agriculture and wind farming with offices and residences on the interior.

Plan by Mark Allison

Plan by Aaron Anderson

The excitement of designing in the Evolo competition comes from experimenting with program and form to create a synergy that is easily recognizable and compelling. In this process, the team spent hours molding and changing the form to house the intended program. Many ideas were thrown out but would give rise to other ideas. I was responsible to designing the agricultural area of the skyscraper and the result was a circular ramp that would house 50 acres of land to be used seasonally.

103

FINAL BOARDS The team worked to compose the final boards to describe the form and features of the skyscraper.

105

FINAL BOARDS

107

109

The pages that follow present my work experience at my current place of employment, Watermark Environmental, Inc. Presented in no particular order: Watermark Environmental, Inc. - Building P-481: Groton, CT - 40 Church Street: Lowell, MA - Milton CAT Facility: North Reading, MA - St Johnâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s High School; Brotherâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s Residence - Lowell Housing Authority

Practice has provided me with many useful experiences to aid in my architectural education. The following pages will show the experience I gained through work on a LEED Gold design that fed into my studies of sustainable design. My practice experience has also taught me the value of thoughtful coordination between consultants and owners. There are many practical values that I have found in my work experience not the least of which include field measuring, site design, space planning, and an introduction to detailing.

SECTION 3

practice: WATERMARK ENV. INC.

Practice Work

The building is 18,787 sf. with two arms ranges, office space, a classroom, a training room, and an armory. The building will be powered though photovoltaics and it attempting to achieve LEED Silver accreditation. This project is currently in construction.

113

term: SPRING 2011- PRESENT location: GROTON, CT

Building P-481 is a small arms range for the navy in Groton, CT. It is designed to train service men and women as well as the greater community of Groton and New London.

practice: WATERMARK ENV. INC.

SMALL ARMS RANGE; BUILDING P-481

CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS 3

20'-7"

1 A-301

3/4" CRUSHED STONE BED

03 RL

7'-4"

41'-2"

A1 A-201 171'-5"

7'-4"

GUARD RAIL

ISMAT STORAGE 113

ISMAT TRAINER 112

EDGE OF RAISED FLOOR

23'-6"

24'-0"

OPEN TO DEPRESSED SLAB 5'-1/4"

VESTIBULE 110

1 3/4"

C.G.

ALIGN

4'-7" 19

10'-2"

10'-4"

SIPRNET/COMM 111

16'-0" M.O.

2'-8" RL

ISSUE 114

TABLE

4 A-302 C

DUST COLLECTOR: SEE RE DRAWINGS.

BULLET COLLECTOR: SEE RE DRAWINGS.

3/4" x 4 " DEEP CRUSHED STONE BED: SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS.

PLATFORM: FOR HOLDING WASTE CONTAINERS, NIC.

RECESSED ENTRY MATS: AT VESTIBULE 110: SEE DETAIL A3/A501 & SCHEDULE I-601. AT VESTIBULE 101: SEE DETAIL A1/A501 & SCHEDULE I-601.

SAFE: 2 AMMUNITION SAFES PURCHASED UNDER FF&E PROCUREMENT. WEAPONS RACKS: "SECURE-IT" BRAND RACKS WITH MESH STEEL DOORS, OR EQUAL PERMANENTLY MOUNTED TO WALL. RACKS TO STORE THE FOLLOWING WEAPONS: (75) 9MM PISTOLS (75) M16 RIFLES (3) 12 GAUGE SHOT GUNS (20) MK 43/M240B LIGHT MACHINE GUNS

CONCRETE SIDEWALK: PROVIDE CONTROL JOINTS AS SHOWN & @ 5' OC TYP.; SEAL ALL JOINTS BETWEEN WALK & BUILDING. PIN WALKS TO FOUNDATION WITH DOWELS AT DOORS 01 & 12. SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS.

BITUMINOUS CONCRETE DRIVEWAY: SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS

GUARD RAIL: SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS

FULL BARRICADE: BALLISTIC BARRICADE ATTACHED TO WALL WITH HINGES. FEC: FIRE EXTINGUISHER & CABINET. SEE 10 00 00 SPECIALTIES ON A-001. SAFETY AREA: PROVIDE FIRST AID KIT; DEFIBRILLATOR; FIRE EXTINGUISHER & CABINET. KNOX BOX: BUILD INTO MASONRY WALL; LOCATION TO BE APPROVED BY FIRE PREVENTION OFFICER

FLAG POLE: SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS.

TABLE: GUNSMITH WORK TABLE PROVIDED UNDER FF&E PROCUREMENT.

MOTOR ACCESS: 2'x2' ACCESS HOLE FOR MOTOR SERVICE, SEE RE DRAWINGS.

VENTILATION CONTROL

VFD FOR MAU

VFD FOR EXHAUST

3'-10"

5'-1"

M.O.

20'-0" 30

C.G.

FIRING LINE

TARGET LINE

28 VESTIBULE 124

FEC

B1 A-402

FIRING LINE STALLS

TRAP MAINTENANCE AREA 129

ACOUSTIC MATERIAL

RUBBER TRAP

23'-4" E C.G.

3'-0" C.G.

VESTIBULE 123

3'-4"

MAT

FLOOR PLAN SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"

OFFICE 118

2'-10"

8'-0"

1'-4"

FEC ACOUSTIC MATERIAL

3'-4"

TARGET LINE

17'-4"

44'-0"

8'-4"

FEC.

CORRIDOR 102 C.G.

3'-4"

3'-8"

3'-0" C.G.

ACOUSTIC MATERIAL

STEEL TRAP

TRAP MAINTENANCE AREA

STRUCTURAL FOOTING

VESTIBULE 119

STORAGE 128

FIRING LINE

STRUCTURAL FOOTING

21'-11" TO FRONT OF TROUGH

25 METERS

19'-0"

20'-0" 35

MECH / ELEC 132

6'-8 1/2"

6'-2" M.O.

1 A-301

B1 A-201 136'-4"

37 RL

FIRING LINE STALLS

19'-6"

131

F.D.

STRUCTURAL FOOTING VFD FOR EXHAUST

RSO 117 8'-8 3/4"

FEC.

DUST COLLECTOR A1 306

3'-3"

16'-0" M.O.

3'-4"

CONCRETE SIDEWALK

09 02

7'-0"

02 1'-4"

FLAG POLE

VESTIBULE 120

1'-11"

VESTIBULE 101

BULLET COLLECTOR

FIXED POINT RANGE 127

2'-6"

COMMAND BOARD C.G.

2'-4"

40'-8"

C.G.

FEC.

KNOX BOX

17 16

2 A-301

A1 A-402

13'-0"

4'-8"

BREAK AREA E 103

BUNK 104 03

7'-0"

CONCRETE SIDEWALK

A A

C.G.

13'-8"

2'-8" M.O.

MOTOR ACCESS

20'-0"

3'-3"

PLANTING

B 23

MALE HEAD 105

6'-4"

STORAGE 121

C 28'-6"

TRAP MAINTENANCE AREA 130

20'-0"

5'-4"

7'-0"

F.D. LAUNDRY 106

RUBBER TRAP

ACOUSTIC MATERIAL

3 A-301

11'-4"

5'-10" MIN.

W/D

F.D.

15'-0"

2 A-301

STORAGE 122

JANITOR 107

29'-0"

1'-0" 3'-4" 3'-4"

F.D.

FIRING LINE STALLS

FIRING LINE

C.G. 07

FEMALE HEAD 108

C1 A-201

TARGET LINE

C.G. 3'-0"

3'-4"

3'-0"

135'-9"

25 YARDS

3'-6"

20'-0"

TROUGH

7 A-401

A1 A-401

FEC. 3'-4"

09 12

20'-0"

VENTILATION CONTROL PANEL VFD FOR MAU

23 24

1'-0"

FEC SAFETY AREA

FULL BARRICADE

9'-2"

149'-2"

66'-8"

3 A-301

3'-3"

D1 A-201

ACOUSTIC MATERIAL

02 35'-4"

RSO 116

149'-2"

8 A-401

CLASSROOM 109

CONCRETE SIDEWALK

17'-0"

32'-0" M.O.

C3 A-302 DYNAMIC RANGE 126

98'-6"

C.G.

3'-3"

3'-4"

PLANTINGS: SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS

STORAGE 125

AMMO / WEAPONS VAULT 115

ALIGN

FIRING LINE STALLS: SEE ACTION TARGET DRAWINGS. ACOUSTIC MATERIAL: TROY BOARD AND TROY WOOL MANUFACTURED BY TROY ACOUSTICS CORPORATION. INSTALL AS SHOWN PER MANUFACTURER'S INSTRUCTIONS. PAINT FLAT BLACK PER MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATION.

SAFE

01 02

09 WEAPONS RACKS

1'-10"

5'-10" MIN. CORRIDOR 102

19'-3"

FEC.

8'-8"

09 15

8'-8"

18'-4"

MAT

4 A-402

C1 A-402

20'-10"

04 8"

11 CONCRETE SIDEWALK

ALIGN

C.G.

6'-4" M.O.

4 A-302

1'-8"

BITUMINOUS CONCRETE DRIVEWAY

7'-0"

KEYED NOTES

41'-7"

3'-10"

1'-10" M.O.

M.O.

16'

SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"

SUSTAINABLE DESIGN I was brought into this project to see it through construction documents. I was the only draftsperson for this projectThis included coordinating the drawings with the consultants drawing as they presented more information and also to alter the design based on the Navyâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s comments.

Trees

This project proved to be very helpful while attending the BAC as I was able to analyze the building design for a class on sustainable design. This would tie back into practice as the information I learned from a sustainable design class would later be used to accredit this project for LEED.

Green Practice TM7428 Assignment 7 Ventilation Section

Adjacent Building

HIGHLIGHTED SPACE: CLASSROOM 49 STUDENTS To be used as a work room for assembling and disassembling weapons as well as presentations on safety and use of small arms.

Darian Mason 3-19-2011

RETURN

16'

AHU 1

AHU 2

12 17'-9" T.O.S. 17'-0" T.O. CONC. PANEL 15'-7" T.O.S.

VENTILATION

SECTION FOR GREEN PRACTICE SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 0

Air is delivered through mechanical ventilation and through natural ventilation from the windows. The space has yet to be constructed but I believe most places will seem comfortable if you are not directly under the vents. Heating sources of the space will include lighting fixtures, people, and solar gain. There is little equipment in the area to add to this. During the warm or hot months, the windows and the surfaces in the space will be sources of cooling; walls, floor, table tops. As the building is a fire arms training facility, the most significant sources of pollution include the fire arm debris, people, and the mechanical units. The mechanical units are mostly on the roof, while those in the building will be ventilated by mechanical ventilation. The fire arm debris has a separate air handling unit to collect, purify, and release the old air and to pump now fresh air into the range. This is the large system that can be seen in the long section. The mechanical and natural ventilation will be able to ventilate the spaces from the pollutants coming from people.

1/2

22'-0" T.O. CONC. PANEL

ERV. 12" ROOF CURB

12" ROOF CURB

10'-0" T.O. WALL

0'-0" T.O. SLAB

-1'-4" T.O. DEPRESSED SLAB

XX-YYY

FIRING LINE

FIRING LINE STALLS

XX-YYY

115

KEYED NOTES

RIDGE CAP (TYP.)

RANGE HVAC

12'-5 1/2"

22'-5 1/2" T.O. ROOF

SNOW GUARDS

RIDGE CAP (TYP.)

RAIN LEADER

GUTTER

STANDING SEAM ROOF

GUTTER

LIGHT FIXTURE

FLASHING

10'-0"

THIN BRICK

C. J.

STANDING SEAM ROOF GUTTER

LIGHT FIXTURE

C. J.

FLASHING

STANDING SEAM ROOF

BRICK

PV PANELS LIGHT FIXTURE

GUTTER

C. J.

BRICK

DUPLEX RECEPTICAL

ROWLOCK COURSING

C.I. BOOT

WEST ELEVATION SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"

ROWLOCK COURSING

C.J. (TYP.)

C.I. BOOT

PRECAST CONCRETE SILL

RANGE HVAC

WATER HYDRANT

DUPLEX RECEPTICAL

C.I. BOOT

BIKE RACK

FINISH GRADE @ 3" BELOW T.O. SLAB

BRICK

PRECAST CONCRETE SILL

0'-0" T.O. SLAB

PRECAST CONCRETE SILL

RANGE HVAC

LIGHT FIXTURE

STAIR

C. J.

EIFS

03 02

DUCT

GAS METER

4'-0" TYP.

4'-0" T.O. WATERTABLE

8'-0"

GUTTER RAIN LEADER

SOLAR COLLECTORS

STANDING SEAM ROOF

LIGHT FIXTURE

BOILER VENT

BRICK

C.I. BOOT

10'-0" T.O. CMU WALL

0'-0" T.O. SLAB

GRADE TO BE 8" BELOW T.O. SLAB

LIGHT FIXTURE

CAP

C. J.

LIGHT FIXTURE

RANGE HRU 2

C. J.

EIFS

C. J. 7'-0"

C. J. 05

CONDUCTER C. J.

C. J.

LIGHT FIXTURE

C. J.

PV PANELS

LIGHT FIXTURE

C. J.

RAIN LEADER

PRECAST CONCRETE WATER TABLE

BRICK

PRECAST CONCRETE SILL FIRE SUPPRESSION INSPECTION DRAIN

C.I. BOOT

GAS METER

1'-4" TYP.

4'-6"

CAP

17'-9" T.O.S

BRICK

C.I. BOOT

36 37

RAIN LEADER

C. J.

C. J. 14

C.I. BOOT

LIGHT FIXTURE

C.J.

LIGHT FIXTURE

C. J.

C. J. EIFS

TYP. 04 12'-0" TYP.

8'-5" T.O. WALL

24'-0" TYP.

CONDUCTER

C.I. BOOT

C. J.

PRECAST WATER TABLE

C. J.

C. J. 04

CONDUCTER

RAIN LEADER

LIGHT FIXTURE

RAIN LEADER

BRICK

ROWLOCK COURSING: DOUBLE ROWLOCK STRING COURSE RECESSED 1/2" WITH MORTAR WASH. DARK RANGE TO MATCH TYPE & QUALITY OF FIELD BRICK.

FLASHING: PROVIDE METAL STEP FLASHING & COUNTERFLASHING TO MATCH METAL ROOFING COLOR AT INTERSECTION OF METAL ROOF & VERTICAL WALLS. SEE ROOF DETAILS A1 A-506.

THIN BRICK: MATCH FULL SIZE BRICK IN QUALITY, TYPE, COLOR, TEXTURE, & RANGE. SEE SPEC ON DRAWING A-304.

T.O. DEPRESSED SLAB

EIFS: DRAINABLE SYSTEM. SEE SPECIFICATION 07 24 00 EXTERIOR INSULATION & FINISH SYSTEMS.

PRECAST CONCRETE SILL: PROVIDE CONTOURED WASH AT BOTH ENDS.

PRECAST CONCRETE WATER TABLE: MATERIAL & FINISH TO MATCH SILLS.

PRECAST CONCRETE CAP: MATERIAL & FINISH TO MATCH SILLS.

WATER HYDRANT: FROSTPROOF, SEE PLUMBING DRAWINGS.

PV PANELS: MOUNTED ON FRAME ATTACHED TO ROOF STRUCTURE. SEE ROOF DRAWING A-103.

SOLAR COLLECTORS: HOT WATER COLLECTORS MOUNTED ABOVE METAL ROOF TO ALLOW DRAINAGE; ALL PIPING TO BE CONCEALED. SEE ROOF DRAWING A-103 & MECH. DRAWINGS.

BIKE RACK: PREFABRICATED GALVANIZED STEEL PIPE CONSTRUCTION.

CAP: ALUMINUM PARAPET COPING CAP, COLOR TO MATCH METAL ROOFING.

FIRE SUPPRESSION INSPECTION DRAIN: PROVIDE CRUSHED STONE BELOW DRAIN TO PREVENT EROSION.

BOILER VENT: PROVIDE GALVANIZED STEEL THIMBLE FLASHED & SEALED INTO MASONRY FOR BOILER FLUE. SEAL ANNULAR SPACE BETWEEN THIMBLE AND FLUE. SEE MECH. DRAWINGS.

GAS METER

DUCT: PROVIDE GALVANIZED STEEL DUCT SLEEVE FLASHED & SEALED INTO MASONRY FOR ALL DUCT/VENT PENETRATIONS.

SNOW GUARDS: PROVIDE AMOUNT & SPACING PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS FOR ROOF TYPE. PROVIDE AT ALL LOCATIONS WITH GUTTERS.

C.J.: CONTROL JOINTS SHOWN SCHEMATICALLY; ADJUST LOCATION OF JOINTS IN ALIGNMENT WITH STRUCTURAL JOINTS IN PRECAST CONCRETE. SEE DRAWINGS A-502 AND A-505

STAIR: SEE DRAWING A-306.

GATE: SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS C-506.

DUST COLLECTOR: PROVIDE GALVANIZED STEEL SLEEVE FLASHED & SEALED INTO MASONRY FOR ALL DUCT/VENT PENETRATIONS. SEE RANGE EQUIPMENT DRAWINGS.

WINDOW CALL: SEE WINDOW SCHEDULE ON A-602 29

CAP

STAIR

GATE

22'-3" T.O. PARAPET 19'-3" T.O. STAIR 15'-5" T.O.S @ LOW POINT

C. J.

GRADE TO BE 8" BELOW T.O. SLAB

BRICK

4'-4" T.O. PRECAST WATER TABLE 0'-0" T.O. SLAB

BRICK

C.I. BOOT

25'-0"

BRICK

ROWLOCK COURSING FIRE SUPPRESSION INSPECTION DRAIN

CAP

C. J. THIN BRICK STANDING SEAM ROOF

24'-3" T.O. PARAPET 22'-9 1/2" T.O. ROOF

C. J. 10

C. J.

16'-2"

LIGHT FIXTURE

C. J.

GUTTER BRICK

10'-0" T.O. CMU WALL

RAIN LEADER ROWLOCK 10'-0" 11 COURSING 01 C.I. BOOT GRADE TO BE 3" BELOW T.O. SLAB 0'-0" T.O. SLAB 02

BRICK

PRECAST CONCRETE SILL

30 1'-0"

NORTH ELEVATION SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"

LIGHT FIXTURE: SEE ELECT. DRAWINGS.

EIFS

08 STANDING SEAM ROOF

2'-8" TYP.

4'-0" TYP.

RIDGE CAP (TYP.) SEE ROOF DETAILS.

06 GRADE TO BE 8" BELOW T.O. SLAB

ERV

STANDING SEAM ROOF: ARCHITECTURAL ALUMINUM; COOL ROOF PATINA GREEN COLOR. SEE SPECIFICATION O7 61 15.00 20 ALUMINUM STANDING SEAM ROOFING.

RANGE MAU 1

PV PANELS

EIFS

DUPLEX RECEPTICAL: SEE ELECT. DRAWINGS.

8'-5" T.O. WALL

DUPLEX RECEPTICAL

RANGE HRU 1

C. J. C. J.

24'-0" TYP.

FLASHING C. J.

C. J.

C.J. TYP.

SCUPPER: PROVIDE OPENING THRU BRICK WALL, SLOPE TO DRAIN STORAGE AREA. BRICK: SOLID CLAY FULL RANGE RED BRICK, WATERSTRUCK SYLE, IN RUNNING BOND, TYPICAL U.O.N., USE CONCRETE BRICK BELOW GRADE. SEE SPECIFICATION 04 20 00 MASONRY.

12'-0" TYP.

GATE

CONDUCTER C. J.

DUPLEX RECEPTICAL

RANGE FAU 1

STAIR

DUST COLLECTOR

EIFS

GRADE TO BE 3" BELOW T.O. SLAB

SOUTH ELEVATION SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"

9'-4"

RAIN LEADER ROWLOCK COURSING

C. J.

CONDUCTER: ALUMINUM TO MATCH COLOR OF METAL ROOF, SEE ROOF DETAILS.

7'-0"

22'-3" T.O. PARAPET

4'-1"

DUCT

TYP.

GUTTER: 5" X 5" RECTANGULAR GUTTER. ALUMINUM TO MATCH COLOR OF METAL ROOF.

4'-1"

4'-4"

RAIN LEADER: ALUMINUM TO MATCH COLOR OF METAL ROOF. FOR METAL ROOF ASSEMBLY: 2" X 3"RECTANGULAR, FOR LOW PITCHED ROOF ASSEMBLY: 3 3/4" X 4 3/4" RECTAGULAR

1'-9 1/2"

RAIN LEADER ROWLOCK COURSE C.I. BOOT

C.I. BOOT

BRICK

06 C.J.

-1'-4"

9'-4" TYP.

BRICK 10'-0" T.O. CMU WALL

10'-0"

2'-8" TYP.

1'-9 1/2" 12'-5 1/2"

PV PANELS

C. J. GUTTER

0'-0" T.O. SLAB

BRICK

GUTTER

DUPLEX RECEPTICAL

STANDING SEAM ROOF

RANGE FAU 2 13

THIN BRICK

24'-3" T.O. PARAPET 22'-5 1/2" T.O. ROOF

4'-4" T.O. PRECAST WATER TABLE

02 10

C.I. BOOT

FLASHING

BRICK

RAIN LEADER

EAST ELEVATION SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"

0'-0" T.O. SLAB

PRECAST CONCRETE CAP

LIGHT FIXTURE PRECAST CONCRETE WATER TABLE

LIGHT FIXTURE

22'-3" T.O. PARAPET

C. J.

1'-4"

C.I. BOOT

CONDUCTER

C. J.

11"

0'-0" T.O. SLAB

C. J.

12'-0" TYP. 24'-0" TYP. 14 EFIS

C. J.

1'-8" TYP.

4'-0"

8'-0" T.O. WALL

C. J.

C.J.

02 03

12'-5 1/2"

4'-6"

C. J.

12'-3"

C. J.

10'-0"

RAIN LEADER

C. J.

9'-9"

17'-9" T.O.S

C. J.

1'-10"

26 04

9'-4" TYP.

PV PANELS CONDUCTER

C.I. BOOT: 8" DIAMETER. PROVIDE FITTING FOR RECTANGULAR RAIN LEADER. CONNECT TO UNDERGROUND DRAINAGE SYSTEM, SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS.

ERV

22'-3" T.O. PARAPET

10'-0" T.O. WALL

ROWLOCK COURSING C.I. BOOT

03 06

SOLAR COLLECTORS

01 06

24'-3" T.O. PARAPET 22'-5 1/2" T.O. ROOF

SNOW GUARDS

C. J.

2'-8" TYP.

0'-0" T.O. SLAB

26 10

C. J.

02 06

C. J.

STANDING SEAM ROOF

BRICK

TYP.

C. J.

12'-0" O.C. TYP.

C. J.

C.J. C. J.

1'-9 1/2"

C. J. THIN BRICK

10'-0" T.O. WALL

CAP

12'-5 1/2"

24'-3" T.O. PARAPET

10'-0"

1'-9 1/2"

ERV

3'-8"

RANGE HVAC

4'-4"

CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS

C.I. BOOT

16'

SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"

SUSTAINABLE DESIGN Case Study of the Small Arms Range in Groton Connecticut Day lighting Analysis: Sources: Lechner, Norbert, Heating, Cooling, Lighting: Sustainable Design Methods for Architects, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Third Edition/2009 MIT Design Advisor

Location of analysis:

Groton and New London, Connecticut 72 Lon., 41.35 Lat. Section taken from section 1 on page 6 of this report. The sun conditions for the southern window are taken at 12 noon on the selected days. These are all products of the sun diagram turned in on Week three. The sun diagram information was taken from the appendix in Lechner at 40 degree Lat.. The conditions for the western wall are all considered for the early morning of 7 or 8 in the morning on July 21. At this time the sun angle would be around 27 degrees or equivalent to the angle during the winter solstice on December. The second drawing is of the additions. The most notable change would be the light shelf at 1â&#x20AC;&#x2122;-6â&#x20AC;? from the head of the window to bring more light into the room and reflect it off of the ceiling. This would disperse the light through the room. For the western windows, an added tint or using low-e windows will keep the harmful glare out of the office and classroom. The added light shelves will bring the sunlight in.

Green Practice: TM 7428 Spring 2011 Week 4 Assignment Feb 21-2011 July 21: Summer Solstice Light coming in at 7 AM in July

Light coming in at 7 AM in July

Areas to be changed

Equinox

This is actually another problem with the design of the building. The first drawing that the sun angle at noon in July would be shaded by the eve. This will also be the case for the western windows. December 21: Winter Solstice Equinox

July 21: Summer Solstice

Tinted and added light shelves to shield space from morning glare and bring more light into space

Equinox

December 21: Winter Solstice

Added light shelf to bring equinox light into the space, because of this angle the window should not be tinted

24 Darian Mason Green Practice Final Project

117

25 Darian Mason Green Practice Final Project

SUSTAINABLE DESIGN

1.1)

Case Study of the Small Arms Range in Groton Connecticut

Comfort: Thermal Comfort in a Representative Room The following figures represent the thermal comfort level within a room as a function of the occupant's distance from the window.

Insulation Analysis: Sources: Lechner, Norbert, Heating, Cooling, Lighting: Sustainable Design Methods for Architects, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Third Edition/2009 www.allwallsystems.com 1

Time of Day:

33 PM PM

1 SECTION

ISMAT STORAGE 113

XX-YYY

LOCATION: NEW LONDON, CONNECTICUT

ISMAT TRAINER 112

B VESTIBULE 110 ISSUE 114

Location of analysis:

Scenario One: January

AMMO / WEAPONS VAULT 115

SIPRNET/COMM 111

D STORAGE 125

Groton and New London, Connecticut 72 Lon., 41.35 Lat.

EDGE OF TRAP

TRAP MAINTENANCE AREA 129

VESTIBULE 124

25 YARD TARGET LINE

CLASSROOM 109

RSO 116

DYNAMIC RANGE 126

TYP. EXTERIOR WALL CONSTRUCTION @ SLOPED ROOF 25 YARD TARGET LINE

TRAP MAINTENANCE AREA 130

TYP. EXTERIOR WALL CONSTRUCTION @ LOW SLOPED ROOF

Scenario One: June

VESTIBULE 123

FEMALE HEAD 108

STORAGE 122 JANITOR 107 STORAGE 121

W/D

LAUNDRY 106

TYP. @ EXTERIOR WALL @ SLOPED

EDGE OF TRAP

FOLDING

VESTIBULE 120

MALE HEAD 105

E REF. UNDERCOUNTER

BUNK 104

RECYCLE UNDERCOUNTER

TRAP MAINTENANCE AREA 131

FIXED POINT RANGE 127

CORRIDOR 102

BREAK AREA 103 RSO 117

COMMAND BOARD

25 YARD TARGET LINE

VESTIBULE 101

22'-3" T.O. PRECAST CONC.

Scenario Two: January XX-YYY XX-YYY

Scenario Two: June

SHEET METAL COPING

4" RIGID INSUL. NAILBASE

XX-YYY

ROOF MEMBRANE

XX-YYY

VAPOR BARRIER

XX-YYY

4" POLYISO. RIGID INSUL.

WASTE STORAGE 133

F MECH / ELEC 132

1 SECTION

16'

Vapor Barrier location: Assuming winter conditions of 20 °F on the exterior and 60°F on the interior of this more industrial part of the building (shooting range) ∆T = 40 °F; Total R-value = 10.49

17'-9" T.O. STEEL.

T(Interior of Layer) = T(Exterior of layer) + (R(Layer) /R(Total)) * ∆T T1 = 20 + (0.17/10.49 * 40) = 20.65°F T2 = 20.65 + (0.8/10.49 * 40) = 23.70°F T3 = 23.70+ (1/10.49 * 40) = 27.51 °F T4 = 27.51 + (7.2/10.49 * 40) = 54.96 °F T5 = 54.96 + (0.64/10.49 * 40) = 57.40 °F T6 = 57.40 + (0.68/10.49 * 40) = 59.99 °F

TYPICAL PITCHED ROOF AS

The placement of the A/V barrier is supported though these calculations. The temperature change between the air barrier and the rigid insulation will be the greatest and thus provide the condition of condensation. If the vapor barier is to be put on the warm side of the insulation that it should be placed between the rigid insulation and the concrete panel. I was also surprized by the thermal resistance provided by the concrete panel. I thought a solid concrete panel would have more of a thermal mass. Also, I am concerned about the vapor barrier on the roof. Should this be under the insulation as well? or would the construction of that be dificult as the insulation is screwed to the roof deck?

16'

ROOF DECK AND STRUCTURE

XX-YYY

VESTIBULE 119

STORAGE 128 OFFICE 118

Winter condition Wall R-value Total: 0.17 + 0.8 + 1.0 + 7.2 + 0.64 + 0.68= 10.49

P.T. WOOD BLOCKING

XX-YYY

The R-value of the indoor air film on a vertical with horizontal heat transfer≈ 0.68. The R-value of the outdoor air film on a vertical surface is ≈ 0.25 (summer, 7.5 mph wind) ≈ 0.17 (winter, 15 mph wind)

XX-YYY

STANDING SEAM METAL R

XX-YYY

ROSIN PAPER

XX-YYY

ICE AND WATER SHIELD (

XX-YYY

4" RIGID INSUL. NAILBASE

XX-YYY

METAL ANCHOR (SEE STR

XX-YYY

METAL DECKING

XX-YYY

COLD ROLLED STEEL JOI

XX-YYY

LT. GA. METAL TRACK

XX-YYY

METAL STUD AND TRACK

XX-YYY

3/4" PLYWOOD

XX-YYY

SHEET METAL FASCIA

XX-YYY

SHEET METAL SOFFIT

T.O

CEILING

1'-6"

D-20

FINISHED CEILING (SE XX-YYY D-74

TYPICAL PRECAST PANEL WALL ASSEMBLY DUST COLLECTOR DUCT (SEE ACTION TARGET DWG)

clear

cool roof 1 floor

MA - Boston Classrooms 0.50 pp/m 2 - 200 lux - 10.00 W/m 2 Room (WxDxH): 6m x 3.3m x 2.7m

esign/[2/25/2011 3:08:58 PM]

XX-YYY

RIGID INSULATION A/V BARRIER

XX-YYY

4" E.I.F.S

XX-YYY

CONT. THRU WALL FLASHING

XX-YYY

BRICK WATER TABLE

Scenario Two low-e

XX-YYY

MA - Boston

75ºF

Classrooms 0.50 pp/m 2 - 200 lux - 10.00 W/m 2 Room (WxDxH): 6m x 3.3m x 2.7m

20ºF

1 3/4" 3 5/8"

3" 7 5/8"

SEE STRUCT. DWG

50ºF 45ºF

1 3/8" 3 5/8"

XX-YYY

BRICK VENEER

R-value of 4” common brick is 0.8: R-value of 0.8

VENEER ANCHOR

R-value of air space of 1/2”- 4” is 1.0: R-value of 1.0

XX-YYY

AIR SPACE

XX-YYY

RIGID INSULATION

XX-YYY

A/V BARRIER

XX-YYY

PRECAST CONC. PANEL WALL

XX-YYY

WEEP HOLES

XX-YYY

CONT. THRU WALL FLASHING

TYPICAL CMU WALL ASS XX-YYY

4'-0" T.O. WATER-TABLE

cool roof 1 floor

WOOD BLOCKING CONTROL JOINT FILLER

R-value of polystyrene board is 3.6 - 4 per inch: 4”x 3.6= R-value of 14.4

10'-11 3/4"

Scenario One

METAL FASCIA TRIM

XX-YYY XX-YYY

R-value of polystyrene board is 3.6 - 4 per inch: 2”x 3.6= R-value of 7.2

R-value of poured concrete is .08 per inch: 8”x 0.08= R-value of .64

AIR SPACE

RIGID INSULATION

XX-YYY

A/V BARRIER

XX-YYY

CMU BACKUP WALL VENEER ANCHOR

XX-YYY

WEEP HOLES

XX-YYY

CONTINOUS THRU WALL FLASHING

XX-YYY

GROUT

XX-YYY

VAPOR BARRIER

SEE STRUCT. DWG

XX-YYY

GROUT

XX-YYY

VAPOR BARRIER

0'-0" T.O. SLAB

T.O

T.O. G

-2'-0" T.O. FOUNDATION

WALL SECTION SCALE: 3/4" = 1'-0"

R-v

XX-YYY

-0'-9" T.O. GRADE

27 Darian Mason Green Practice Final Project

R-valu R-value o R-va

BRICK VENEER

XX-YYY XX-YYY

T.O. FOUND

WALL SECTION SCALE: 3/4" = 1'-0"

28 Darian Mason Green Practice Final Project

While I drafted the wall sections of the building I also analyzed the wall sections for their R-value and insulation ability.

TYP. EXTERIOR WALL CONSTRUCTION @ SLOPED ROOF TYP. @ EXTERIOR WALL @ SLOPED ROOF

th horizontal heat The R-value of the indoor air film on a vertical with horizontal heat transfer≈ 0.68. The R-value of the outdoor air film on a vertical surface is ≈ 0.25 (summer, 7.5 mph wind) ≈ 0.17 (winter, 15 mph wind)

urface is

Winter condition Wall R-value Total: 0.17 + 0.8 + 1.0 + 10.8 + 1.11 + 0.68= 14.56

ior and 60°F on the g (shooting range)

Vapor Barrier location: Assuming winter conditions of 20 °F on the exterior and 70 °F on the interior ∆T = 50 °F; Total R-value = 14.56

er) /R(Total)) * ∆T TYPICAL PITCHED ROOF ASSEMBLY

ough these he air barrier and the vide the condition of he warm side of the igid insulation and ermal resistance concrete panel oncerned about the he insulation as well? he insulation is

CEILING

XX-YYY

STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF

XX-YYY

ROSIN PAPER

XX-YYY

ICE AND WATER SHIELD (WHOLE ROOF)

XX-YYY

4" RIGID INSUL. NAILBASE

XX-YYY

METAL ANCHOR (SEE STRUC.)

XX-YYY

METAL DECKING

XX-YYY

COLD ROLLED STEEL JOIST

XX-YYY

LT. GA. METAL TRACK

XX-YYY

METAL STUD AND TRACK

XX-YYY

3/4" PLYWOOD

XX-YYY

SHEET METAL FASCIA

XX-YYY

SHEET METAL SOFFIT

R-value of polystyrene board is 3.6 - 4 per inch: 4”x 3.6= R-value of 14.4: This allows for a continuos themal protection in for the building envelope.

T(Interior of Layer) = T(Exterior of layer) + (R(Layer) /R(Total)) * ∆T T1 = 20 + (0.17/14.56 * 50) = 20.58 °F T2 = 20.58 + (0.8/14.56 * 50) = 23.32 °F T3 = 23.32 + (1/14.56 * 50) = 26.75 °F T4 = 26.75 + (10.8/14.56 * 50) = 61.90 °F T5 = 61.90 + (1.11/14.56 * 50) = 65.71 °F T6 = 65.71 + (0.68/14.56 * 50) = 68.05 °F I am not sure why this final temperature does not equal 70 °F. However, the placement of the A/V barrier is supported though these calculations. The temperature change between the air barrier and the rigid insulation will be the greatest and thus provide the condition of condensation. If the vapor barier is to be put on the warm side of the insulation that it should be placed between the rigid insulation and the concrete block.

10'-0" T.O. WALL

1'-6"

FINISHED CEILING (SEE RCP) XX-YYY D-74

1 3/4" 3 5/8"

3" 7 5/8"

WOOD BLOCKING

XX-YYY

CONTROL JOINT FILLER

TYPICAL CMU WALL ASSEMBLY XX-YYY

10'-11 3/4"

METAL FASCIA TRIM

XX-YYY

R-value of 4” common brick is 0.8: R-value of 0.8 R-value of air space of 1/2”- 4” is 1.0: R-value of 1.0 R-value of polystyrene board is 3.6 - 4 per inch: 3”x 3.6= R-value of 10.8

BRICK VENEER

XX-YYY

AIR SPACE

XX-YYY

RIGID INSULATION

XX-YYY

A/V BARRIER

XX-YYY

CMU BACKUP WALL

R-value of 8” concrete block is 1.11: R-value of 1.11

XX-YYY

VENEER ANCHOR

XX-YYY

WEEP HOLES

XX-YYY

CONTINOUS THRU WALL FLASHING

XX-YYY

GROUT

XX-YYY

VAPOR BARRIER

Green Practice TM7428 Week 6 Assignment # 1 Darian Mason 3/12/2011

SEE STRUCT. DWG

0'-0" T.O. SLAB

For this assignment, I am basing the R-values off of the lecture notes for composite wall components and the website http://www.allwallsystem.com/design/RValueTable.html. accessed on March 12/2011. These are wall sections that I have drafted for the project and include the information that wil be included in the construction set.

-0'-9" T.O. GRADE -2'-0" T.O. FOUNDATION

WALL SECTION SCALE: 3/4" = 1'-0"

0’

1’

2’

3’

29 Darian Mason Green Practice Final Project

119

The arms range had many special design components. The construction documents required that we coordinated the drawings to the firing range consultant’s drawings. The building’s construction required that we design a ballistic envelope around the range. Also, the air handling unit for the range needed to be placed and coordinated into the range space to push air down the range and completely filter all air. For these drawings I consulted the consultant drawings and was directed by the lead architect. The stair at the rear of the building needed to be designed including the structure, layout, and flashing where the stair penetrated the parapet. For these drawings I was directed by the structural engineer and the lead architect.

CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS

12 D3 A-505

7 OPP A-305

7 9 A-305 10'-0" T.O. CMU WALL

10' T.O. CMU WALL

VEST. 110

CORRIDOR 102

ISSUE 114

0'-0" T.O. SLAB

COUNTER

2'-0" EIFS C. J.

ROOF MEMBRANE FLASHING

22'-3" T.O. PRECAST CONC.

TYP. LOW PITCHED ROOF ASSEMBLY ROOF MEMBRANE

4" RIGID INSUL.

ROOF DECK AND STRUCTURE

1'-1 1/2"

17'-9" T.O. STEEL.

FULL BARRICADE

2'-0" THIN BRICK

HINGE ATTACH HINGE TO INTERIOR WALL

C. J.

1'-0"

4'-0"

10'-0"

TEMP. BRACING

D2 A-503

B2 A-505

SEALANT

1/2" PLYWOOD

METAL STUDS 16" O.C.

B3 A-505

TYPICAL PRECAST PANEL WALL ASSEMBLY

LIGHT FIXTURE

SHIM

3 5/8" METAL TRACK

SEALANT

METAL TRACK

4" EIFS

BALLISTIC CEILING

EIFS RECEPTOR

TARGET TRACK

CONTINUOUS FLASHING

PRECAST CONCRETE WATER TABLE

BRICK VENEER

6" LT. GAUGE METAL FRAMING

ACT SUPPORT

ACT

BULLET COLLECTOR AUGER

DETAIL SCALE: 3/4" = 1'-0"

1'-3" 8"

1 3/8" 3 5/8"

AIR AND VAPOR BARRIER

VENEER ANCHOR

AIR SPACE

A2 A-505

4'-0"

3'-4" T.O. BRICK

1'-3" 8"

2" RIGID INSULATION

PRECAST CONCRETE WALL

TERMINATION BAR

1 3/8" 3 5/8"

DETAIL SCALE: 3/4" = 1'-0"

SEALANT

DIFFUSER

SEALANT

GWB SOFFIT

SEALANT

METAL COPING: ALUMINUM, COLOR TO MATCH STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF. SEE SPECIFICATION 07 54 19 POLYVINYL-CHLORIDE (PVC) ROOFING.

P.T. WOOD BLOCKING: ATTACH SECURELY TO TOP OF WALL, CHAMFER TO PITCH AS SHOWN.

1 1/2" NAILBASE INSULATION: ATTACH SECURELY TO PRECAST CONCRETE WALL.

PRECAST CONCRETE WALL: TYPICAL AT RANGE WALLS.

ROOF MEMBRANE FLASHING: SEE ROOF PLAN A-103.

ROOF MEMBRANE: FULLY ADHERED PVC COOL ROOF SYSTEM, SEE SPECIFICATION 07 54 19 POLYVINYL-CHLORIDE (PVC) ROOFING.

4" RIGID INSULATION: MECHANICALLY ATTACHED POLYISOCYANURATE PER SPECIFICATION.

ROOF DECK AND STRUCTURE: STEEL DECK ON OPEN WEB STEEL JOISTS. JOIST DESIGN BY JOIST MANUFACTURER. SEE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS.

AIR & VAPOR BARRIER: SPRAY APPLIED SYSTEM WITH SELF ADHERING MEMBRANE USED TO BRIDGE GAPS AND SEAL ALL JOINTS TO PROVIDE A CONTINUOUS SEAL. SEE SPECIFICATION 07 27 00 AIR/VAPOR BARRIERS ON DRAWING A-001.

4" EIFS: EXTERIOR INSULATION & FINISH SYSTEM ON 4" OF EXTRUDED POLYSTYRENE INSULATION. SEE SPECIFICATION 07 24 00 EXTERIOR INSULATION & FINISH SYSTEMS.

EIFS RECEPTOR: PREFABRICATED RECEPTOR BY EIFS MANUFACTURER DESIGNED TO WEEP ANY MOISTURE FROM WITHIN EIFS SYSTEM.

CONTINUOUS FLASHING: ASPHALT LAMINATED COPPER FLASHING SEALED TO CONCRETE WALL AND AIR & VAPOR BARRIER WITH TERMINATION BAR & SEALANT COMPATIBLE WITH EIFS SYSTEM.

PRECAST CONCRETE WATER TABLE: TO MATCH SILLS, SEE SPECIFICATION 04 20 00 MASONRY.

BRICK VENEER: SUBSTITUTE SOLID CONCRETE BRICK BELOW GRADE. SEE ELEVATIONS A-201 & 04 20 00 MASONRY.

VENEER ANCHOR: ADJUSTABLE 2 PART ANCHORS, 16" OC VERTICALLY, 24" HORIZONTALLY, TYPICAL. ATTACH ANCHORS TO CONCRETE WITH IMPACT OR SELF-TAPPING FASTENERS APPROVED BY DESIGNER OF RECORD (DOR). SEE SPECIFICATION.

AIR SPACE: MAINTAIN AIR SPACE CLEAR OF MORTAR FOR PROPER DRAINAGE.

2 " RIGID INSULATION: EXTRUDED POLYSTYRENE ADHERED TO WALL.

TERMINATION BAR: CONTINUOUS METAL BAR FASTENED TO CONCRETE WALL WITH IMPACT OR SELF-TAPPING FASTENERS APPROVED BY DOR. SEAL TO FLASHING AND AIR/VAPOR BARRIER.

WEEP HOLES: 24" OC TYPICAL PER SPECIFICATION. KEEP CLEAR OF MORTAR.

MORTAR MESH: POLYESTER OR HIGH DENSITY POLYETHYLENE AT ALL LOCATIONS WITH WEEP HOLES PER SPECIFICATION.

GROUT: GROUT CAVITY SOLID BELOW GRADE AS SHOWN.

VAPOR BARRIER: CONTINUOUS POLYETHYLENE SHEET VAPOR BARRIER UNDER ENTIRE SLAB. SEAL ALL JOINTS, REPAIR ANY RIPS OR HOLES.

SEALANT: SEE A-001

PLYWOOD: SEAL ALL SEAMS

METAL STUD: LIGHT GAUGE METAL STUDS 16" O.C.

LIGHT FIXTURE: SEE ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS

SHIM

AIR AND VAPOR BARRIER

METAL TRACK: LIGHT GAUGE METAL

4" EIFS

EIFS RECEPTOR

METAL TRACK: SIZE TRACK TO BE FASTENED INTO TARGET TRACK FASTENER AND RECEIVED METAL STUDS

CONTINUOUS FLASHING

BALLISTIC CEILING: SEE RE DRAWINGS

PRECAST CONCRETE WATER TABLE

TARGET TRACK: SEE RE DRAWINGS

ACT SUPPORT: TIE WIRE

BRICK VENEER

VENEER ANCHOR

AIR SPACE

4'-0" T.O. BRICK

2" RIGID INSULATION

PRECAST CONCRETE WALL

TERMINATION BAR

ACT: SEE REFLECTED CEILING PLAN

ACT CLIP: PROVIDE CLIPS TO HOLD DOWN ACT PANELS IN PLACE WHILE RANGE HVAC IS ON.

ACT GRID: PROVIDE MANUFACTURERS STANDARD GRID THAT WORKS WITH HOLD DOWN CLIPS

ACT CLOSURE PANEL: SHEET METAL PANEL PAINT TO MATCH GRID SYSTEM

DIFFUSER: SEE RM DRAWINGS

GWB SOFFIT: 1/2" GYPSUM WALL BOARD ON LIGHT GAUGE METAL FRAMING

WEEP HOLES

CONTINUOUS FLASHING

ROLLER DOOR: SECURITY ROLLER DOOR

COUNTER: SOLID SURFACE COUNTER

ACT SUPPORT

MORTAR MESH

ACT

GROUT

ACT CLIP

ACT GRID

VAPOR BARRIER

0'-0" T.O. SLAB T.O. GRADE

T.O. FOUNDATION

1'-1"

TYPICAL PRECAST PANEL WALL ASSEMBLY

T.O. FOUNDATION

1 BLOCK + 3 BRICK COURSES

1/2" PLYWOOD

1'-8 1/2"

SEALANT

4'-0"

DUST COLLECTOR DUCT

DETAIL SCALE: 3/4" = 1'-0"

13'-9"

DETAIL SCALE: 3/4" = 1'-0"

4'-0" 18 BRICK COURSES

3'-8 1/2"

1/2" PLYWOOD

BARRICADE DETAIL SCALE: 1 1/2"= 1'-0"

4'-0 1/2"

6'-7 3/4"

ACOUSTIC MATERIAL

18 BRICK COURSES

MOCK UP PANEL SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"

0'-11"

THIN BRICK

1 BLOCK + 3 BRICK COURSES

EIFS

B2 A-503 A2 A-503

1'-8 1/2"

8'-0" BRICK

BUILDING SECTION SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" BRICK

1 1/2" NAILBASE INSULATION

4'-0"

PRECAST CONCRETE WALL

T.O. GRADE

3'-8 1/2"

AMMO/ WEAPONS VAULT 115

0'-0" T.O. SLAB ROLLER DOOR

METAL COPING P.T. WOOD BLOCKING

4'-6"

KEYED NOTES

TYP. PARAPET ASSEMBLY

8 A-305

3''

BALLISTIC CEILING

ACT CLOSURE PANEL

ACT AND BAFFLE SCALE: 3" = 1'-0"

9''

= 1'-0"

6''

12''

18''

SCALE: 1 1/2"= 1'-0" 0

6''

SCALE: 3"

SCALE: 3/4" = 1'-0" 0

WALL SECTION AT AUGER SCALE: 3/4" = 1'-0"

WALL SECTION (TYP. AT REAR OF RANGE) SCALE: 3/4" = 1'-0"

16'

SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 0

SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"

8" PRECAST CONCRETE

TAPCON SCREWS

FLASHING MEMBRANE

FASTENERS

CONTINOUS CLEATS

1'-11"

CHANNEL STRINGER

36"

(2) 1/2" P.T. PLYWOOD BLOCKING

METAL FLASHING

J CHANNEL

METAL CLIP

CAULKING

GRATE TREAD (TYP.)

1'-11"

LANDING PAD

JAMB DETAIL SCALE: 3" = 1'-0"

CLIP ANGLE

STRUCTURAL FOOTING

STAIR SECTION AT BOTTOM LANDING SCALE: 3/4" = 1'-0"

1'-6"

19'-3"

1 1/4" DIA. GUARD RAIL

17'-9"

BULLET COLLECTOR

A1, C1 A-508

DUST COLLECTOR

3'-6" 1'-3"

1'-3"

FACE OF LANDING

STEEL BAR

3'-10" FACE OF WATERTABLE FACE OF STAIR

A-306

GUARD RAIL

HAND RAIL

A-306

GUARD RAIL

HAND RAIL

FENCE

1/2" P.T. PLYWOOD BLOCKING

METAL FLASHING

J CHANNEL

ROOF MEMBRANE

TAPCON SCREWS

FLASHING MEMBRANE

FASTENERS

CONTINUOUS CLEATS

METAL CLIP

CAULKING

4" E.I.F.S.

AIR AND VAPOR BARRIER

8" PRECAST CONCRETE

1 1/2" NAILBASE

STRUCTURAL COLUMN

STRUCTURAL BEAM

NEWAL POST

DUST COLLECTOR

BULLET COLLECTOR

LANDING PAD

CLIP ANGLE: FIXED TO CONCRETE FOOTING WITH ANCHOR BOLTS

CHANNEL STRINGER

GRATE TREAD (TYP.): GALVANIZED STEEL

STEEL BAR

1" NOSING OVERLAP

CARRIER PLATE

PLATFORM

CHECKER PLATE NOSING, BAR END PLATES

RAIL SECTION (TYP.) SCALE: 3/4" = 1'-0"

CHANNEL STRINGER

CARRIER PLATE

C2 A-306 GRATE TREAD (TYP.)

CHECKER PLATE NOSING, BAR END PLATES PLATFORM

HAND RAIL

SIM.

FENCE

STRUCTURAL BEAM

STRUCTURAL COLUMN

33 EQ. RISERS @ 7" = 19'-3"

19 T @ 11" = 17'-5"

D4 A-306

METAL FLASHING

FENCE

DUST COLLECTOR

BULLET COLLECTOR

STEEL CHANNEL

2 1/2" X 3/16"

D1 A-306

GUARD RAIL

B4 A-306

1" NOSING OVERLAP

1 3/4" 7/16" Ø HOLES IN STRINGER

B4 RMAX = 5K

STAIR SECTION (TYP.) SCALE: 3/4" = 1'-0"

DRILL AND GROUT ANCHOR BOLTS BY STAIR INSTALLER

(6) # 6 EQ. SP. @ 12" O.C.

A4 A-306

42" MIN.

4'-0"

TYP.

STRUCTURAL FOOTING

0'-0" T.O. SLAB

3''

3'-10"

9''

= 1'-0"

1'-2" 01

STRUCTURAL FOOTING

SCALE: 3/4" = 1'-0"

STRUCTURAL FOOTING 18" DIA.

6''

SCALE: 3"

3'-0"

UP 20 R

STRUCTURAL FOOTING

CHANNEL STRINGER

STRUCTURAL FOOTING:

11"

3'-0" LANDING

4'-0"

NEWAL POST

UP 13 R

GRATE TREAD (TYP.)

12 T @ 11" = 11'-0"

STAIR SECTION SCALE: 3/4" = 1'-0"

6" MIN.

UP 3R

3'-0" LANDING

STRUCTURAL FOOTING

# 3 TIES

A-306 01

28 42"

1 1/2"

1 1/4" DIA. HAND RAIL

ROOF AT STAIR LANDING

2 T @ 11"= 1'-10"

KEYED NOTES

4" TYP. O.C

4" E.I.F.S

ROOF MEMBRANE

36"

AIR AND VAPOR BARRIER

HAND RAIL

42"

1 1/2" NAILBASE

GUARD RAIL

ENLARGED PLAN- STAIR SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"

STAIR SECTION SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"

121

FOOTING DETAIL SCALE: 3/4" = 1'-0"

SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"

123

The owner then submitted these drawings to the potential renter who reviewed them and presented their changes. We then balanced the potential renter’s requirements with the owner’s preferences for the space. The goal was to accommodate the renter’s requirements while keeping the majority of the space unchanged.

125

term: SPRING 2011- PRESENT location: LOWELL, MA

The 40 Church Street Building is in Lowell, Ma. This building is an older office building in the downtown area of Lowell. The fifth floor tenants are moving out and the District Attorney’s Office is moving into the floor. The move requires the owner of the property to gather as built drawings to record the work that the past tenants have done and to record the available area of the floor.

practice: WATERMARK ENV. INC.

40 CHURCH STREET BUILDING

FIELD MEASUREMENTS

PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS

5/18/2011

SQUARE FOOTAGES FOR PROGRAM

150 100 42 42

Subtotal Staff Areas SUPPORT AREAS Records Supply Closet Main Distribution (MDF/Phone) Staff Support Room Coat Closet

1 2 1 1 2

250 75 50 100 18

Subtotal Meeting Areas

250 150 50 100 36

150 497 42 42

1943

1 2 1 1 2

586

Subtotal Equipment Areas MEETING AREAS Library/Conference Room Interview Room

1 5 1 1

1902

Subtotal Support Areas EQUIPMENT IN OPEN AREAS Copy/Fax/Printer

150 500 42 42

200 125 325

100 sq ft D.A MGR

9 sq ft RECORDS

CIRCULATION 864 sq ft

111 sq ft CAFL MGR

18 sq ft COAT

STAIR #1

MEN'S ROOM NEW SINK

18 sq ft COAT

1 1

99 sq ft D.A. MGR

100 sq ft D.A. MGR

150 sq ft D.A. SUP.

B PROJECT TITLE

70 sq ft RECORDS

246 150 50 100 36

276 sq ft LIB. CONF. 200 125

100 sq ft CAFL MGR

582

1 1

100 sq ft CAFL MGR

98 sq ft D.A. MGR

1 5 1 1

176 sq ft CAFL SUP.

276 142 418

40 sq ft QUEUING

STAFF AREAS District Court Senior Manager Manager Administrative Assistant Intern

100 sq ft D.A. MGR

176 311 42 42

MECH.

WOMEN'S ROOM

ELEVATOR

25 sf - copy

1 3 1 1

42 sq ft D.A. ITRN.

150 300 42 42

25 sf - copy

150 100 42 42

40 CHURCH STREET

35 sq ft Records

40 CHURCH STREET LOWELL, MA

25 sq ft Records

05/18/11 PROGRAM ANALYSIS MARK DATE DESCRIPTION

50 sq ft MDF 17 sq ft RECORDS 17 sq ft RECORDS

51 sq ft Recep. 82 sq ft SEATING

142 sq ft INTERVIEW

107 sq ft J.V. MRG

100 sq ft J.V. MGR

75 sq ft SUPPLY CL.

1 3 1 1

NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION SQUARE FOOTAGES ARE NOT CALUCULATED FOR LEASE PURPOSES.

75 sq ft SUPPLY CL.

STAFF AREAS CAFL Senior Manager Manager Administrative Assistant Intern

PROPOSED

42 sq ft D.A. ADM

150 407 42 42

42 sq ft JV ITRN

1 4 1 1

42 sq ft JV ADM

150 400 42 42

PROPOSED LAYOUT SF Subtotal

50 sq ft RECORDS

150 100 42 42

Subtotal

42 sq ft CAFL ADM 42 sq ft CAFL ITRN

1 4 1 1

23 sq ft RECORDS

(Square footages are not calculated for lease purposes) DCAM PROGRAM TYPE OF ROOM AREA Staff STAFF AREAS Juvenile Senior Manager Manager Administrative Assistant Intern

100 sq ft STAFF SUPPORT

40 Church Street - 5th Floor Program Analysis

PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE:11018

100 sq ft J.V. MGR

150 sq ft J.V. SUP

LEGEND

16'

EXISTING WALL TO REMAIN NEW CONSTRUCTION TO BE DEMOLISHED

FIFTH FLOOR PROGRAM ANALYSIS SCALE: 1/8" =

1'-0"

2 127

CHURCH.pln

DRAWN BY: DGM

CHK'D BY: JAM COPYRIGHT WATERMARK 2009

SHEET TITLE

FIFTH FLOOR PROGRAM ANALYSIS

SHEET _

OF _

ITERATIONS The new plan was drafted through multiple iterations. Through this process I became acquainted with space planning in offices and how to draft an office so that the usability is clear.

PROPOSED ROOM AREA 5TH FLOOR A: 4,932 sq ft

MANAGER

5TH FLOOR A: 104 sq ft

5TH FLOOR A: 126 sq ft

5TH FLOOR A: 136 sq ft

MANAGER

5TH FLOOR A: 101 sq ft

5TH FLOOR A: 110 sq ft

5TH FLOOR A: 103 sq ft

5TH FLOOR A: 247 sq ft

PROJECT

5TH FLOOR A: 199 sq ft

RELOCATED WINDOW

CORE

5TH FLOOR A: 180 sq ft

5TH FLOOR A: 316 sq ft

MEN'S ROOM ROOM AREA 5TH FLOOR A: 115 sq ft

SHELVES

STAIR #1 SEATING

RECYCLING

SHELVES

STAFF SUPPORT 5TH FLOOR A: 121 sq ft

STORAGE

MECH. ELEVATOR

40 C ST

SCAN AREA 5TH FLOOR A: 96 sq ft

COPY

5TH FLOOR A: 102 sq ft

40 CH L

SHELVES

Stair

5TH FLOOR A: 124 sq ft

COATS 26 CABINETS RECORDS

WOMEN'S ROOM

12/14/1

10/24/1

5TH FLOOR A: 183 sq ft

ROOM AREA

05/18/1

5TH FLOOR A: 113 sq ft

COPY

J:\01 Projects\11018 - Trainor-40 Church Street-5th Floor\5 - Working Files\Model\11018

CONFERENCE

SENIOR MANAGER

CHURCH.pln

Wednesday, December 14, 2011 2:12 PM

FINAL PLAN

MARK DATE

MANAGER

RECEPTION

5TH FLOOR A: 131 sq ft

5TH FLOOR A: 54 sq ft

RELOCATE WINDOW

ADMIN

PARALEGAL

5TH FLOOR A: 66 sq ft

PROJECT N

INTERN

5TH FLOOR A: 75 sq ft

MODEL FILE

MANAGER

5TH FLOOR A: 44 sq ft

INTERVIEW

Manager 5TH FLOOR A: 102 sq ft

5TH FLOOR A: 142 sq ft

Manager 5TH FLOOR A: 104 sq ft

DRAWN BY:

5TH FLOOR A: 140 sq ft

MANAGER

CHK'D BY: P

5TH FLOOR A: 139 sq ft

SHEET T

LEGEND

16'

EXISTING WALL TO REMAIN

FIFTH FLOOR PROGRAM SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"

NEW CONSTRUCTION: FULL HEIGHT TO BE DEMOLISHED NEW PARTITION: 6' HIGH

SCHEM

VOICE AND DATA OUTLET

2 129

SHEE

131

1 VIEW TO WEST

2 VIEW TO EAST

The process for this project took an unexpected turn as another company saw the project through schematic design and then Watermark has taken over for the design development and construction documentation. This project includes sending out multiple bid packages as well as a full set of drawings. The drawings were produced from the schematic documentation Watermark received from the previous design firm. This required that the design changed from the original as it developed for construction.

133

term: SPRING 2011- PRESENT location: NORTH READING, MA

The Milton CAT facility is 29,600 sf and will house a warehouse, offices, marketing, sales, and a shop to fix construction equipment.

practice: WATERMARK ENV. INC.

MILTON CAT FACILITY

INITIAL DRAWINGS Watermark was given the AMEC civil and site drawings as well as the floor plans and renderings that were designed through the design development phase. Watermark still needed to make multiple changes and adjustments to bring the design through all the bid packages and construction phase.

SOUTH ELEVATION

NORTH ELEVATION

EAST ELEVATION

WEST ELEVATION

K:\11016- MILTON CAT.rvt

1 2

REV

4 3 4 5 6 7

F A-1.3 3

A-301 3

10 11

Level 1 0' - 0"

A-301 2

12 13

3.5

A-301 4

3.5

C A-1.3 2

B A-301 1

15 16 17

135 18

Section 1 1/8" = 1'-0" A-301

Level 4 32' - 0"

Level 3 22' - 0"

Level 2 14' - 0"

Level 0 -4' - 0"

Section 2 1/8" = 1'-0"

4 Level 4 32' - 0" H

Level 2 14' - 0" Level 3 22' - 0" G

Level 1 0' - 0"

Level 0 -4' - 0"

Level 2 14' - 0"

Level 1 0' - 0"

Level 0 -4' - 0"

Section 4 1/8" = 1'-0" 19 F

A-1.4 1

A Level 4 32' - 0" D

Level 3 22' - 0"

DRAWN BY:

GRAPHIC SCALE:

1/8" = 1'-0"

TITLE:

DRAWING NO:

SHEET:

A-301

OF X 1

WASH BAY BELOW

4 M

2 3 4 5 6 7

1.5

OPEN TO BELOW

PROJECT NUMBER: 109.017.001

8 9

REVISION ISSUE DESCRIPTION

2 3

TO ROOF

5 TON CRANE

K K

A-301

2.8

42 43 44

2.8 25' - 0" 1' - 6"

A-301

5' - 11 5/8"

5 TON CRANE

JAN. 5' - 10"

DUCT CHASE

MEN'S LOCKER ROOM

STORAGE CLOSET

TANK STORAGE BELOW

10' - 6"

35' - 3"

BREAK ROOM

12' - 11"

OFF.

I.T.

OPEN OFFICE

WOMEN'S LOCKER ROOM

3.3

7 5

4' - 0"

3.3

23' - 6"

3.5

VENDING

24' - 7"

20' - 5"

12' - 3"

3.5 25

RAMP

1' - 6"

FIRST FLOOR PLAN 1" = 10'-0"

4 0"

19 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

CHAIR STOR.

OFF.

OPEN TO BELOW

Level 1 0' - 0" 5 TON CRANE

BUILDING SECTIONS

14 15 16

10' 17

20' 18

10'

40' 19

SHEET:

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19

TRAINING ROOM

OPEN TO BELOW

OUTDOOR STORAGE ROOF

PROJECT MANAGER:

A/E OF RECORD:

SCALE:

CAD FILE: B

SECOND FLOOR PLAN 1" = 10'-0"

20'

18 19

SHEET:

1' - 1"

A-1.4 1

GRAPHIC SCALE:

PROJECT MANAGER:

DRAWN BY:

A/E OF RECORD:

TITLE:

SCALE:

CAD FILE:

40'

SECOND FLOOR PLAN

1" = 10'-0"

DRAWING NO:

A-102 OF

PLEASE NOTE: THIS DOCUMENT MAY NOT ACCURATELY REPRESENT THE FINAL DOCUMENT. ONLY AN ENGINEER, ARCHITECT OR SURVEYOR SIGNED, SEALED AND DATED PAPER COPY, PROVIDED BY THIS OFFICE, MAY BE UTILIZED FOR BIDDING OR CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES.

Structural Engineering Mechanical Engineering Electrical Engineering Civil Engineering

47A York Street, Portland, Maine 04101 207.553.7753 www.colbycoengineering.com

Colby Company

9' - 7 11/16"

1' - 6"

Milton CAT PROPOSED FACILITY

6 16' - 0"

51' - 0"

84 Concord Street - North Reading, MA

DATE

ISSUED FOR CLIENT REVIEW 05-02-11

REV

16' - 0"

PROJECT:

12 17

CURRENT ISSUE STATUS:

9 15

11' - 0"

52' - 8"

F 16

Structural Engineering Mechanical Engineering Electrical Engineering Civil Engineering

UP 15

47A York Street, Portland, Maine 04101 207.553.7753 www.colbycoengineering.com

37 19

Colby Company

79' - 0"

16' - 0"

20 23' - 6"

20' - 2"

63 36' - 0"

1' - 6"

30' - 0"

4' - 0"

9' - 0"

3.5 14

84 Concord Street - North Reading, MA

Level 0 -4' - 0"

1 34

DATE

30 12

30' - 0"

Level 2 14' - 0"

REVISION ISSUE DESCRIPTION

3 4 Q

27' - 6"

30' - 0"

Level 3 22' - 0"

12' - 0"

30' - 0"

13' - 0"

9' - 0"

30' - 0"

8' - 5"

30' - 0"

60' - 0"

9' - 0 5/8"

1.5 10

23' - 5"

30' - 0"

15' - 3 1/8"

35' - 0"

30' - 0"

1 9

12' - 0"

30' - 0"

40 29 8

Milton CAT PROPOSED FACILITY

2 A-301

Level 4 32' - 0"

1 39 7

ISSUED FOR CLIENT REVIEW 06-07-11

1.5 3 4 18

92' - 5"

2 3.5 17

20' - 0"

5/20/2011 4:59:53 PM K

10' - 0"

A-301

CANOPY

1.5 3 16

J:\01 Projects\11016 - Colby-Milton Cat-North Reading\DESIGN\6 - Deliverables\Model\11016- MILTON CAT.rvt

A 5

8' - 10"

Q 15

Structural Engineering Mechanical Engineering Electrical Engineering Civil Engineering

PROJECT:

1 2 14

10' - 0"

1 13

31' - 6"

1.5 12

47A York Street, Portland, Maine 04101 207.553.7753 www.colbycoengineering.com

1 11

Colby Company

CURRENT ISSUE STATUS:

H 10

12' - 0"

M 9

Milton CAT PROPOSED FACILITY

REV

3 7

84 Concord Street - North Reading, MA

2 6

ISSUED FOR CLIENT REVIEW 06-07-11

J 5

PROJECT:

1 4

DATE

I drafted the base drawings of this project from the existing images of AMEC drawings. The base drawings were then used for the multiple bid packages as required.

REVISION ISSUE DESCRIPTION

CURRENT ISSUE STATUS:

7/18/2011 6:28:24 PM

K:\11016- MILTON CAT.rvt

7/18/2011 6:28:30 PM

BASE DRAWINGS Q 19

38 10

3 33 15' - 0"

22 4

LOADING DOCK

1' - 6" 33

32 13' - 2"

GRAPHIC SCALE:

A/E OF RECORD:

PROJECT MANAGER:

PROJECT NUMBER: 109.017.001

TITLE:

DRAWN BY:

CAD FILE:

SCALE:

DRAWING NO:

FIRST FLOOR PLAN

A-101 X

11' - 3"

HOSE ROOM

MEZZ. @ 10'

A-301

Section 3 1/8" = 1'-0"

PROJECT NUMBER: 109.017.001

BID PACKAGE PROCESS Through this project, I learned about the bid process for fast tracked projects. The bid packages are sent out to contractors for specific elements of the building. As this building is a pre-engineered metal building (PEMB), there was a separate bid package for the PEMB information of the building and separate bid packages for the masonry that would be constructed later as well as the membrane roofing.

08 11

BUILDING SIGNAGE WALL N.I.C.

MASONRY PARTITION 6 MEZZANINE (ABOVE)

30' - 0" N

LOADING DOCK

10' X 16' INSULATED OVERHEAD DOORS

22' X 16' INSULATED OVERHEAD DOORS

22' X 16' INSULATED OVERHEAD DOORS; ALTERNATE: 16' X 16' DOORS

8' X 8' INSULATED OVERHEAD DOOR

3' X 7' MOISTURE RESISTANT DOOR

3' X 7' INSULATED DOOR (STEEL WALL)

ALUMINUM STOREFRONT DOOR. (SEE ELEVATIONS FOR HEIGHT)- 7'x 6' DOUBLE DOOR

8' X 7'-6" AUTOMATIC SLIDING DOOR

8' X 8' INSULATED GLASS VISION, OVERHEAD DOOR

3' X 7' FIRE RATED METAL DOOR

6' X 7' DOUBLE DOOR, FIRE-RATED WITH VISION GLASS

STEEL FRAMING, STEEL DECK AND 4" CONCRETE TOPPING W/ FFE 14'-0" ABOVE WAREHOUSE/SERVICE BAY FOR OFFICE AREA. FRAMING TO BE ISOLATED FROM CMU PARTITION WALLS AND STAIRWAY STRUCTURE. FRAMING TO SUPPORT 50 PSF LIVE LOAD AND 15 PSF LIVE PARTITION LOADS, AS WELL AS 10 PSF SUPERIMPOSED DEAD LOAD.

ALTERNATE 3:

PROVICE STEEL JOIST AND COLLATERAL GALVANIZED STEEL ROOF DECKING OVER TANK ROOM AND WASH BAY. TO BE SUPPORTED ON CMU BEARING WALLS. DESIGN FOR MASSACHUSETTS BUILDING CODE LOADS.

OUTDOOR STORAGE

DATE

9' - 4"

FACE OF BUILDING

26' - 4" REV

25' - 0" 84' - 10"

PROJECT NUMBER: 109.017.001

2.8

PROJECT MANAGER:

3.3

A/E OF RECORD: DRAWN BY: CAD FILE: SCALE:

GRAPHIC SCALE:

1" = 10'-0" PEMB FIRST FLOOR 1" = 10'-0"

TITLE:

PEMB FIRST FLOOR PLAN A

DRAWING NO:

10'

ROOF DRAIN: 5" DIAMETER METAL ROOF DRAIN

PARAPET: BUILT UP PRESSURE TREATED WOOD. MAINTAIN A CONSISTENT ELEVATION AROUND BUILDING.

ROOF HATCH: 30" X 60" ABOVE STAIR

ELEVATOR VENT

ALTERNATE 1:

STEEL FRAMING, STEEL DECK AND 4" CONCRETE TOPPING FOR MEZZANINE WITH FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION (FFE) = 10'-0" ABOVE WAREHOUSE/ SERVICE BAY FFE. TO SUPPORT LIGHT STORAGE (125PSF) LIVE LOAD. WITH 10 PSF COLLATERAL DEAD LOAD.

ALTERNATE 2:

ALTERNATE 3:

PROVICE STEEL JOIST AND COLLATERAL GALVANIZED STEEL ROOF DECKING OVER TANK ROOM AND WASH BAY. TO BE SUPPORTED ON CMU BEARING WALLS. DESIGN FOR MASSACHUSETTS BUILDING CODE LOADS.

ALTERNATE 4:

PROVIDE A 30 YEAR WARRANTY FOR MEMBRANE ROOF (SEE SPECIFICATION)

ROOF AREA 1

15' - 6"

ROOF DRAIN (TYP.)

3" / 1'-0" 6

- 1'-2"

R.D.

20'

40'

SHEET:

A-1.1 OF

5 ROOF AREA 5

- 9"

TAPERED INSULATION

3" / 1'-0"

1/4" PITCH

1/4" / 1'-0"

CANOPY

- 10 1/4"

R.D.

- 1'-2"

R.D.

0'-0"

E PARAPET 8

A-1.3

3" / 1'-0"

HANGING STRUTS 12' O.C. TYP.

TAPERED INSULATION ROOF LADDER

PARAPET

1/4" PITCH

ROOF AREA 3

ROOF AREA 4

R.D.

PARAPET 3

1/4" PITCH 40' - 1"

0'-0"

-10'-0"

R.D.

-10'-5"

-10'-0"

1/4" PITCH

PARAPET

-10'-5"

14' T.O.S.

-10'-0"

ALTERNATE 3

23' - 4"

24' - 3"

37' - 2"

PROJECT NUMBER: 109.017.001 PROJECT MANAGER:

A/E OF RECORD:

ROOF PLAN 1" = 10'-0"

DRAWN BY: CAD FILE: SCALE:

2.8

3.3

GRAPHIC SCALE:

3.5

1" = 10'-0"

52' - 8" 30' - 0"

26' - 4"

1'-0"

1/4"

TITLE:

TOP OF PARAPET 32' - 0"

PEMB ROOF PLAN

T.O.S 31' - 6" H.P

T.O.S 30' - 4" L.P

DRAWING NO:

DIAGRAM 2 1" = 10'-0"

10'

20'

40' SHEET:

C 26' - 0"

EXTERIOR WALL NIC

ALTERNATE 2

D MEZZ. @ 10'

16' X 16' INSULATED OVERHEAD DOORS

10' X 16' INSULATED OVERHEAD DOORS

22' X 16' INSULATED OVERHEAD DOORS

3' X 7' MOISTURE RESISTANT DOOR

3' X 7' INSULATED DOOR (STEEL WALL)

ALUMINUM STOREFRONT DOOR. (SEE ELEVATIONS FOR HEIGHT)- 7'x 6' DOUBLE DOOR

8' X 7'-6" AUTOMATIC SLIDING DOOR

8' X 8' INSULATED GLASS VISION, OVERHEAD DOOR

3' X 7' FIRE RATED METAL DOOR

METAL PANEL ABOVE MASONRY WALL

ALTERNATE 3:

PROVICE STEEL JOIST AND COLLATERAL GALVANIZED STEEL ROOF DECKING OVER TANK ROOM AND WASH BAY. TO BE SUPPORTED ON CMU BEARING WALLS. DESIGN FOR MASSACHUSETTS BUILDING CODE LOADS.

ALTERNATE 4:

PROVIDE A 30 YEAR WARRANTY FOR MEMBRANE ROOF (SEE SPECIFICATION)

REVISION ISSUE DESCRIPTION

REV A/E OF RECORD:

DRAWN BY: CAD FILE: GRAPHIC SCALE:

1" = 10'-0" TITLE:

PEMB SECOND FLOOR 1 1" = 10'-0"

PEMB SECOND FLOOR PLAN

DRAWING NO:

10'

20'

40' SHEET:

Structural Engineering Mechanical Engineering Electrical Engineering Civil Engineering

WINDOW, 3' X 4', ALUMINUM WINDOW UNIT, N.I.C.

WINDOW, 3' X 3', ALUMINUM WINDOW UNIT, N.I.C.

A-1.3

5' - 11"

2' - 7"

PRE-ENGINEERED METAL BUILDING- SEE SPECIFICATION

METAL BAND: ATTACHED 3' BLACK METAL PANEL

INSULATED METAL PANEL: IPP IIINSULATED WALL PANELS OR EQUAL, TYP. 3" THICKNESS WITH R-VALUE OF 23 MIN.

MASONRY BUILDING: COORDINATE OPENING IN METAL BUILDING WITH MASONRY BUILDING

BUILDING SIGNAGE WALL: N.I.C.

GLASS CANOPY: N.I.C. PROVIDE FRAMING TO SUPPORT CANOPY AND STRUTS

STRUTS: N.I.C.

OUTDOOR STORAGE SCREEN: N.I.C.

RAMP RAILS: N.I.C.

OUTDOOR STORAGE MASONRY SCREEN: N.I.C.

Colby Company

AUTO DOOR

Level 1 0' - 0"

OUTDOOR STORAGE 10 MASONRY SCREEN RAMP RAILS

A-1.3

P.E.M.B

A-1.3

Level 4 32' - 0" MASONRY BUILDING Level 3 22' - 0"

SCALE:

BUILDING SIGNAGE WALL

PROJECT MANAGER:

7 6

PEMB NORTH ELEVATION 1" = 10'-0"

MASONRY BUILDING

PROJECT NUMBER: 109.017.001

STRUTS GLASS CANOPY

A-1.3

Level 3 22' - 0"

Level 2 14' - 0"

Level 4 32' - 0"

Level 0 -4' - 0"

OUTDOOR STORAGE ROOF

3.3

METAL BAND

DATE

6/15/2011 3:16:40 PM

ALTERNATE 2:

2.8

MASONRY BUILDING

OUTDOOR STORAGE SCREEN

C.L. LOWER CANOPY STEEL 19' - 0"

6' X 7' DOUBLE DOOR, FIRE-RATED WITH VISION GLASS

PEMB EAST ELEVATION 1" = 10'-0"

ALTERNATES

OPEN TO BELOW

MASONRY STRUCTURE ROOF BELOW NIC

Level 1 0' - 0"

Level 0 -4' - 0"

ALTERNATE 3

KEYED NOTES

C.L. UPPER CANOPY STEEL 29' - 0"

8' X 8' INSULATED OVERHEAD DOOR

1. SEE FLOOR PLANS FOR DOOR NOTES

WINDOW NOTES

Level 2 14' - 0"

GENERAL NOTES

Level 3 22' - 0"

10' - 0" O.C. TYP.

22' X 16' INSULATED OVERHEAD DOORS; ALTERNATE: 16' X 16' DOORS

ALTERNATE 1:

GLASS CANOPY

CANOPY SUPPORT STRUTS GLASS CANOPY

ALTERNATE 1

92' - 5"

MASONRY PARTITION

BUILDING SIGNAGE WALL: N.I.C.

BUILDING SIGN WALL

A-1.2

137

Level 2 14' - 0"

Level 1 0' - 0"

Level 0 -4' - 0"

PEMB SOUTH ELEVATION 1" = 10'-0"

DATE

53' - 9"

OUTDOOR STORAGE: STRUCTURE AND ROOF BY P.E.M.B CONTRACTOR

5 6

BUILDING SIGNAGE WALL D

STRUTS

GLASS CANOPY

3.5

3.3

2.8

1.5

1 Level 4 32' - 0" 4

MASONRY BUILDING Level 3 22' - 0"

Level 2 14' - 0"

REV

OPEN TO BELOW

CRANE K

4' - 0"

9' - 0"

MASONRY PARTITION

01 MASONRY STRUCTURE NIC

LOADING DOCK: N.I.C.

3.5

14' - 0"

3.3

4' - 0"

30' - 0"

CRANE

8' - 5"

14' - 0"

ALTERNATE 3

MEZZANINE- SEE STRUCTURAL DWGS FOR LOADING: SEE ALTERNATES

MASONRY BUILDING

DOOR NOTES (DOORS N.I.C.)

SECOND FLOOR FINISHED ELEVATION

13' - 0"

MASONRY PARTITIONS: SUPPORTED BY PRE-ENGINEERED METAL BUILDING, N.I.C.

Level 4 32' - 0"

84 Concord Street - North Reading, MA

OPEN TO BELOW

13' - 0"

01 MASONRY STRUCTURE NIC

11' - 0"

FIRE PROTECTION EQUIPMENT: FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION TO BELOCATED 5 ON FRONT FACE OF BUILDING.

30' - 0"

ELEVATOR: H.C. ACCESSIBLE, N.I.C.

METAL BAND

2.8

REVISION ISSUE DESCRIPTION

CRANE

MASONRY STRUCTURE: SELF SUPPORTING, N.I.C.

CURRENT ISSUE STATUS:

Milton CAT PROPOSED FACILITY

12' - 0"

30' - 0"

01 MASONRY STRUCTURE ROOF BELOW NIC

30' - 0"

METAL PANEL ABOVE MASONRY WALL

9' - 0"

Colby Company

KEYED NOTES

10' - 0"

ISSUED FOR P.E.M.B. BID 06-13-11

9' - 8"

MASONRY BUILDING

10' - 0"

1' - 1"

11' - 1 3/16"

PROJECT:

52' - 8"

CURRENT ISSUE STATUS:

91' - 1"

47A York Street, Portland, Maine 04101 207.553.7753 www.colbycoengineering.com

8' - 0"

1.5

4' - 0"

3.5

METAL BAND INSUL. METAL PANELS

A-1.3

4' - 0"

PRE-ENGINEERED METAL BUILDING

4' - 0"

PROJECT NUMBER: 109.017.001 PROJECT MANAGER: A/E OF RECORD:

4' - 0"

1.5

FACE OF METAL BUILDING TO FACE OF STEEL DIMENSION IS BASED ON 10" PURLINS AND 3" PANELS. PRE-ENGINEERED METAL BUILDING (P.E.M.B.) MANUFACTURER TO ADJUST DIMENSIONS BASED ON ACTUAL DIMENSIONS REQUIRED. THE BUILDING FOOTPRINT IS A CONTROLLING FACTOR AND IS TO REMAIN UNCHANGED.

6/15/2011 3:17:02 PM

Structural Engineering Mechanical Engineering Electrical Engineering Civil Engineering

GENERAL NOTES

Structural Engineering Mechanical Engineering Electrical Engineering Civil Engineering

ELEVATOR VENT: SHAFT TO END BELOW ROOF

ALTERNATES

J:\01 Projects\11016 - Colby-Milton Cat-North Reading\DESIGN\6 - Deliverables\Model\11016- MILTON CAT.rvt

BUILDING SIGNAGE AND WALL: N.I.C

J:\01 Projects\11016 - Colby-Milton Cat-North Reading\DESIGN\6 - Deliverables\Model\11016- MILTON CAT.rvt

TAPERED INSULATION

J:\01 Projects\11016 - Colby-Milton Cat-North Reading\DESIGN\6 - Deliverables\Model\11016- MILTON CAT.rvt

1' - 1"

FACE OF COLUMN

22' - 0"

ROOF HATCH

- 1'-2"

R.D.

- 10 1/4"

R.D.

REVISION ISSUE DESCRIPTION

FACE OF COLUMN

ROOF AREA 5: CANOPY- GLASS AND METAL FRAMED, N.I.C., PROVIDE STRUCTURAL SUPPORTS FOR CANOPY ATTACHMENTS TO P.E.M.B.

TAPERED INSULATION

- 1'-2"

PARAPET (TYP.)

23' - 4"

OUT TO OUT MASONRY FACE 1' - 1"

- 9"

1/4" / 1'-0"

RAMP

FACE OF BUILDING

ROOF AREA 4: MEMBRANE ROOFING AND FLASHING SYSTEM. SEE SPECIFICATION "MEMBRANE ROOFING AND FLASHING" FOR REQUIREMENTS.

TAPERED INSULATION

13'UP - 2"

- 10 1/4"

R.D.

-10'-0"

PARAPET

PROVIDE A 30 YEAR WARRANTY FOR MEMBRANE ROOF (SEE SPECIFICATION)

20' - 2"

- 1'-2"

A-1.3

6/15/2011 3:16:50 PM

ALTERNATE 4:

7 05

MASONRY STRUCTURE N.I.C.

ROOF AREA 3: MEMBRANE ROOFING AND FLASHING SYSTEM. SEE SPECIFICATION "MEMBRANE ROOFING AND FLASHING" FOR REQUIREMENTS.

ROOF LADDER

- 1'-2"

Milton CAT PROPOSED FACILITY

FIRE PROTECTION EQUIPMENT

R.D.

84 Concord Street - North Reading, MA

1/4" / 1'-0"

- 10'-6"

193' - 2"

ALTERNATE 2:

ISSUED FOR P.E.M.B. BID 06-13-11

30' - 0"

FACE OF COLUMN

FACE OF BUILDING

6/15/2011 3:16:32 PM

1' - 1"

0'-0"

PARAPET

PROJECT:

FACE OF COLUMN

20' - 0"

1' - 1"

J:\01 Projects\11016 - Colby-Milton Cat-North Reading\DESIGN\6 - Deliverables\Model\11016- MILTON CAT.rvt

74' - 0"

36' - 0" 04

FACE OF BUILDING

40' - 0"

CURRENT ISSUE STATUS:

30' - 0"

FACE OF COLUMN 1' - 1"

FACE OF BUILDING

52' - 8"

0'-0"

ALTERNATE 3

3.5

30' - 0"

TAPERED INSULATION

-10'-0" ROOF AREA 2

ALTERNATES ALTERNATE 1:

R.D.

16' X 16' INSULATED OVERHEAD DOORS

- 10'-6"

144' - 10"

Milton CAT PROPOSED FACILITY

11' - 0"

13' - 0"

30' - 0"

-10'-0"

84 Concord Street - North Reading, MA

CRANE

-10'-0"

ROOF AREA 2: MEMBRANE ROOFING AND FLASHING SYSTEM. SEE SPECIFICATION "MEMBRANE ROOFING AND FLASHING" FOR REQUIREMENTS.

DATE

15' - 0"

T.O.S 31' - 6" H.P

1.5

ROOF AREA 1: MEMBRANE ROOFING AND FLASHING SYSTEM. SEE SPECIFICATION "MEMBRANE ROOFING AND FLASHING" FOR REQUIREMENTS.

REVISION ISSUE DESCRIPTION

26' - 0"

BUILDING SIGNAGE WALL: N.I.C.

KEYED NOTES

1/4"

1/4" PITCH

123' - 2"

MASONRY STRUCTURE

REV

MASONRY PARTITION

CRANE

OUTDOOR STORAGE: STRUCTURE AND ROOF BY P.E.M.B CONTRACTOR

TOP OF PARAPET 32' - 0"

26' - 4"

84 Concord Street - North Reading, MA

16' - 0"

30' - 0"

DOOR NOTES (DOORS N.I.C.)

06 01

LOADING DOCK: N.I.C.

26' - 4"

ISSUED FOR P.E.M.B. BID 06-13-11

ELEVATOR

3.5 52' - 8"

60' - 0"

FIRE PROTECTION EQUIPMENT: FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION TO BELOCATED 5 ON FRONT FACE OF BUILDING.

MASONRY STRUCTURE

MEZZANINE- SEE STRUCTURAL DWGS FOR LOADING: SEE ALTERNATES

30' - 0"

1/4" PITCH

142' - 8"

DIAGRAM 1 1" = 10'-0"

46' - 0"

46' - 8"

11' - 0 1/4"

MASONRY PARTITIONS: SUPPORTED BY PRE-ENGINEERED METAL BUILDING, N.I.C.

T.O.S 30' - 4" L.P

2 P

30' - 0"

CRANE

ELEVATOR: H.C. ACCESSIBLE, N.I.C.

30' - 0"

MASONRY STRUCTURE N.I.C

1'-0"

PROJECT:

16' - 0"

MASONRY STRUCTURE: SELF SUPPORTING, N.I.C.

1.5 60' - 0" 30' - 0"

CURRENT ISSUE STATUS:

FACE OF COLUMN

47A York Street, Portland, Maine 04101 207.553.7753 www.colbycoengineering.com

FACE OF COLUMN

11 1' - 1"

KEYED NOTES

Milton CAT PROPOSED FACILITY

FACE OF BUILDING

30' - 0"

1' - 1"

30' - 0"

INSIDE FACE OF BUILDING

ISSUED FOR P.E.M.B. BID 06-13-11

1' - 1"

PROJECT:

26' - 4"

FACE OF COLUMN 04 07

26' - 4"

Structural Engineering Mechanical Engineering Electrical Engineering Civil Engineering

3.5 52' - 8"

30' - 0"

Colby Company

30' - 0"

04 06

46' - 8"

2 190' - 10"

FACE OF COLUMN

1.5 60' - 0" 30' - 0"

1' - 1"

FACE OF BUILDING

46' - 0"

FACE OF BUILDING

47A York Street, Portland, Maine 04101 207.553.7753 www.colbycoengineering.com

Colby Company

92' - 5"

GENERAL NOTES

19' - 0"

1' - 2"

R.D.

1/4" PITCH

PARAPET

123' - 2"

47A York Street, Portland, Maine 04101 207.553.7753 www.colbycoengineering.com

Level 1 0' - 0"

Level 0 -4' - 0"

DRAWN BY: CAD FILE: SCALE: GRAPHIC SCALE:

1" = 10'-0"

PEMB WEST ELEVATION 1" = 10'-0"

TITLE:

PEMB ELEVATIONS A

10'

20'

DRAWING NO:

40'

SHEET: 1

A-1.4 OF

139

2'-10 1/2"

WOOD TRIM EXISTING STEEL BEAM

WOOD COLUMN WRAP

6'-8" MIN.

GWB, PTD

WOOD CAP, TYP) STONE TILE BASE

ST. JOHN’S HIGH SCHOOL: BROTHER’S RESIDENCE

141

term: SPRING 2011- PRESENT location: SHREWSBURY, MA

This project is currently in the construction phase.

practice: WATERMARK ENV. INC.

St. John’s High School has been in operation for generations. Part of the campus included a residence for clergy. As the school has expanded and the Brothers have retired, the school is renovating what use to be their residence hall into administrative offices.

CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS I began working on this project just as construction was set to begin. The construction drawings were about to be issued and required minor changes to the door schedule and to the elevator details.

ROOFING

ELEVATOR NOTES

013

SLOPED CEILING

2x10 WOOD RAFTERS, 16" O.C.

1'-6"

METAL FASCIA

012

SIDING

011

SHEATHING

010

FRAMING

009

000

A.C.D

000

HOIST BEAM

ONE SIDED

008

RAFTER HEADER

013

ROOFING

The structural design changed for the elevator and changes need to be drafted. I was given the mark ups for the elevator penthouse and then drafted the changes.

FIRE RATED GWB

3'-0"

3 SQ.FT. ALUM. ELEVATOR VENT

014

001

SUMP PIT

002

WATERPROOFING - INTEGRAL PIT WATERPROOFING, SEE SPECIFICATIONS.

003

ELEVATOR RAILS

004

FLOOR SLAB PATCH

005

PIT REINFORCEMENT - SEE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS.

006

FLOOR EXTENSION - EXTEND EXISTING CONCRETE FLOOR SLAB AS SHOWN.

007

SHAFTWALL - CONTINUOUS 2HR ENCLOSURE

008

RAFTER HEADER

009

FLAT ROOF FRAMING - 2x8 WOOD JOISTS @ 16" O.C.

010

FLAT ROOF SHEATHING - 5/8" PLYWOOD

011

RUBBER ROOF SYSTEM - SINGLE PLY MEMBRANE

012

ELEVATOR VENT - SEE MECHANICAL DRAWINGS. PROVIDE WEATHERTIGHT MEMBRANE FLASHINGS AS REQUIRED.

013

FLASHING

014

FIRE RATED GWB - 2HR RATING

CLEAR HOISTWAY

ELEVATOR

015

CEILING JOIST HEADER

REMOVE SECTIONS OF EXISTING ROOF RAFTERS AND CEILING JOISTS AS REQUIRED TO PROVIDE CLEAR SHAFTWAY FOR NEW ELEVATOR. PROVIDE BUILT-UP HEADERS AND GALV. JOIST HANGERS TO MAINTAIN STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY.

8'-0"

CLEAR HOISTWAY

CONCEALED SPACE ON SECOND FLOOR 12'-8" MIN

SEAL WINDOW OPENING WITH MTL STUDS AND GWB, GLAZING FACE TO BE FINISHED WITH OBSCURING FILM

NEW FLOOR AND CARPET ON FIRST FLOOR

CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE STRUCTURAL STEEL EXTENSIONS FROM FLOOR SLAB THROUGH ELEVATOR SHAFT TO SUPPORT ELEVATOR RAILS AT EACH FLOOR AND AT THE ROOF. 1 HR FIRE RATED NEW CEILING AND UNISTRUT SUPPORT

EXISTING CONCRETE FLOOR SLAB

COMPONENTS PROVIDED BY ELEVATOR MANUFACTURER

DEMO LANDING EDGE: ALIGN W/ SECOND FLOOR LANDING

A FIRST LEVEL/ SECOND LEVEL SIMILAR

NEW LANDING BEAM

DEMO BEAM

STEEL BRACKET PROVIDED BY GENERAL CONTRACTOR NEW CONC. FLOOR WITH METAL DECKING

TYP. ELEVATOR THRESHOLD DETAIL SCALE: 1 1/2"=

1'-0"

G SHAFTWALL

ELEV. MACHINE RM 2 HR FIRE RATED

CLEAR CAB 5'-7 1/4"

11'-6"

CLEAR CAB 4'-1 1/2"

007

CLEAR HOISTWAY 5'-9"

014

ELEVATOR

CLEAR HOISTWAY 003 ELEVATOR RAILS

DESCRIPTION

004

FLOOR SLAB PATCH 8'-0"

FLOOR SLAB PATCH

004

ELEV MACH

MARK

5'-9" 002

5'-6"

4'-0"

5'-9"

DATE

ELEVATOR MACHINE ROOM 2 HOUR RATED ROOM 021

WATERPROOFING & WATERSTOP

NEW ELEVATOR IN EXISTING STAIRWELL

1'-9"

BROTHERS BUILDING RENOVATIONS, J:\01 Projects\11003 - St Johns HS-Brothers Building\6 - Deliverables\Model\St Johns - Brothers Redesign030311.pln; Wednesday, March 09, 2011; 12:48 PM

NEW STEEL BEAM

B 3'-0"

ONE SIDED

PREPARED FOR: ST. JOHNS HIGH SCHOOL

A B A6

005

1'-2"

001

PIT REINFORCEMENT

SUMP PIT

A GROUND LEVEL

ELEVATOR SECTION A-A

ENLARGED ELEVATOR PLANS

SCALE: 1/2" = 1'-0"

ELEVATOR KEY PLAN SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0"

PROJEC

ELEV DET

IT DIRECTOR 014

2 A3 005

ALUMNI DIRECTOR 003

COMMON 010

EQ.

ANNUAL FUND DIR. 002

JANITOR 016

UP X1 X

010

X1 VESTIBULE 001

002

X WC 006

DIR. OF ADVANCEMENT. 004

WORK ROOM 005

008

TYP.

STORAGE RM. 019

015

EXIST. CABINETS

FACULTY WORK RM 023

FRAMES

SIZE

WIDTH

HEIGHT

THICK.

TYPE

MAT'L. FINISH

TYPE

45 MIN. FIRE RATING

X4 X5 001 002

SEE NOTE #1

SEE NOTE #2

X4 X5 001 002

NEW DOOR IN EXISTING FRAME EXISTING DOOR IN EXISTING FRAME SPRINKLER RM MECH. RM. CORRIDOR MECH. RM.

WDSC

OFFICE

3'-0"

6'-8"

1 3/4"

WDSC

FAC. WORK RM.

3'-0"

6'-8"

1 3/4"

WDSC

FAC. WORK RM.

3'-0"

6'-8"

1 3/4"

WDSC T

OPEN OFFICE

DIR. OF ADVANCEMENT

009

3'-0"

6'-8"

1 3/4"

WDSC

REFECTORY

OPEN OFFICE

(2) 2'-0"

6'-8"

1 3/4"

WDSC

010 011

VESTIBULE

EXTERIOR

3'-0"

6'-8"

1 3/4"

STEEL T

CORRIDOR

STORAGE

012

3'-0"

6'-8"

1 3/4"

WDSC

CORRIDOR

JANITOR

3'-0"

6'-8"

1 3/4"

WDSC

013 014

CORRIDOR

EXTERIOR

3'-0"

6'-8"

1 3/4"

STEEL PT

013

VESTIBULE

EXTERIOR

3'-0"

6'-8"

1 3/4"

WDSC

014

015

CORRIDOR

OPEN OFFICE

3'-0"

6'-8"

1 3/4"

WDSC

101 102

NOT USED

LOBBY

RECEPTION

3'-0"

6'-8"

1 3/4"

WDSC

103 104

LOBBY

DIR. OF ADMISSIONS

3'-0"

6'-8"

1 3/4"

WDSC

BUSINESS MANAGER

CLOSET

(2) 3'-0"

6'-8"

1 3/4"

WDSC

105

BUSINESS MANAGER

CLOSET

(2) 3'-0"

6'-8"

1 3/4"

WDSC

106

BUSINESS MANAGER

CLOSET

(2) 3'-0"

6'-8"

1 3/4"

WDSC

107

ADMIN. STOR.

CLOSET

3'-0"

6'-8"

1 3/4"

WDSC

108

DIR. OF COMM.

CLOSET

3'-0"

6'-8"

1 3/4"

WDSC

201 202

CORRIDOR

SECRETARY

3'-0"

6'-8"

1 3/4"

WDSC

SECRETARY

COLLEGE REFERENCE

3'-0"

6'-8"

1 3/4"

203 204

CORRIDOR

DIR. OF GUIDANCE

3'-0"

6'-8"

1 3/4"

CORRIDOR

JANITOR

3'-0"

6'-8"

205

WOMEN

CORRIDOR

3'-0"

6'-8"

DOOR AND FRAME SCHEDULE

206

MEN

CORRIDOR

3'-0"

6'-8"

207

DIR. OF GUIDANCE

MECH. ROOM

2'-8"

SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"

208

FACULTY WORKROOM

MECH. ROOM

209

MECH.

CORRIDOR

210

CORRIDOR

TECH OFFICE

2'-6" 10"

3'-0"

4" 6'-8"

2" 6'-8"

FRAME TYPES

CPT X

VCT

016

JANITOR

PT X

VCT X

VC X

SA SA

017

UNISEX HCWC

* CT CT

PT X CT

018

FACULTY LUNCH

019

STORAGE RM.

VCT VCT

VC VC

SA / GWB SA

020

KITCHEN

021

ELEV. MACHINE ROOM

VC X

003 004

UNISEX HCWC

CORRIDOR

ELEV. MACHINE RM.

CORRIDOR

005

CORRIDOR

006

CORRIDOR

007 008

CLOSET

7 4

003 004

005

4 4

006 007

008

009

010

011

012

90 MIN. FIRE RATING

VESTIBULE

FACULTY WORK RM.

X PT

VCT X

CPT

X X

VCT / *

024

KITCHEN CLOSET

025

REFECTORY

026

STAIR

027

ELECTRIC PANEL AREA

PATCH EXISTING QUARY TILE

SA SA

SPRINKLER RM.

MECH RM.

VESTIBULE

PT*

TILE**

102

**RECESSED ENTRY MAT SYSTEM; *CHAIR RAIL @ 36"

LOBBY

PT*

TILE

PT/SA

*WAINSCOT - SEE DETAIL ON SHEET A4 *WAINSCOT - SEE DETAIL ON SHEET A4

WAITING

PT*

TILE

PT/SA

RECEPTION

CPT

CONFERENCE ROOM

CPT

CHAIR RAIL - SEE DETAIL SHEET A4

DIR. OF ADMISSIONS

ACADEMIC DEAN

CPT X

SA X

CHAIR RAIL - SEE DETAIL SHEET A4

107 108

DIRECTOR OF COMM.

109

COPY ROOM

PT X

JANITOR

PT X

110

PT X

X SA X

PT PT

111

STORAGE

117

BUSINESS MANAGER

118

FILES

CORRIDOR

PT PT PT

120

PT PT PT

CPT

STAIR

PT PT PT

CPT

119

PT PT

BUSINESS OFFICE

PAINT ALL METAL SURFACES OF STAIR STRUCTURE

STAIR

CPT

FULL HEIGHT STILE AND RAIL WOOD PANELING - SEE SHEET A5

202

WAITING SECRETARY

204

DIR. OF GUIDANCE

PT PT PT

CPT CPT CPT

SA SA SA

FULL HEIGHT STILE AND RAIL WOOD PANELING - SEE SHEET A5

203 205

COLLEGE REFERENCE ROOM

CPT

CORRIDOR

PT PT

TECH. OFFICE

PT PT

CPT

207

PT PT

CPT

CHAIR RAIL - SEE DETAIL SHEET A4

206

CPT

208

COUNSELOR

CPT

209

COUNSELOR

JANITOR

CPT VCT

CPT VC

SA SA

210

PT PT

WOMEN'S ROOM

MEN'S ROOM

212

STORAGE

CPT

OFFICE

CPT

STORAGE

CPT

215

COUNSELOR

CPT

216

FACULTY WORK ROOM

PT PT

CPT

COUNSELOR

PT PT

CPT

217

PT PT

CPT

218

CPT

219

STORAGE STAIR

CPT

CPT X

SA SA

220

MECH ROOM

VCT

221

MECH ROOM

VCT

222

MECH ROOM

VCT

PAINT ALL METAL SURFACES OF STAIR STRUCTURE -

SET #6 3 PAIR BALL B EARING BUTT HINGES ONE INCH DIAMETER ROUND PULL BAR/ PUSH HANDLE, RADIUS STYLE 2 HEAVY DUTY PARALLEL ARM CLOSERS 2 RUBBER PLUG SILENCERS SET #7 3 PAIR BALL BEARING BUTT HINGES FOR EACH LEAF HEAVY DUTY LEVER HANDLE CYLINDER LOCKSET, STORAGE FUNCTION, ACTIVE LEAF FLUSH BOLT INACTIVE LEAF 2 RUBBER PLUG SILENCERS FOR EACH DOOR LEAF FLOOR STOPS FOR EACH LEAF SET #8 SAME AS SET #7 EXCEPT WITH OFFICE FUNCTION LOCKSET SET #9 1 1/2 PAIR BALL BEARING BUTT HINGES HEAVY DUTY LEVER HANDLE MORTISE LOCKSET, PASSAGE FUNCTION DOOR STOP 3 RUBBER PLUG SILENCERS SET #10 3 HEAVY DUTY TAMPER PROOF HINGES FIRE EXIT HARDWARE, CYLINDER LOCK SET DOOR CLOSER ELECTRIC STRIKE AND PROXIMITY READER ELECTRONIC SWITCH FOR SECURITY MONITOR 3 RUBBER PLUG SILENCERS ADA COMPLIENT THRESHOLD WEATHER STRIPPING

015

SEE DETAILS A4

-102

103 104

105

106

108

WDSC

201 202

WDSC

1 3/4"

WDSC

203 204

1 3/4"

WDSC

205

1 3/4"

WDSC

206

6'-8"

1 3/4"

WDSC

207

2'-8"

6'-8"

1 3/4"

WDSC

208

2'-8"

6'-8"

1 3/4"

WDSC

209

KEY PLAN-BROTHERS

3'-0"

6'-8"

1 3/4"

WDSC

210

SCALE: 1/64" = 1'-0"

143

NEW CONCRETE ACCESSWAY - CAST-IN-PLACE CONCRETE LANDINGS AND STAIRS. RISE 6", TREAD 12". 6" CHEEK WALL PARALLEL DIRECTION OF STAIRS. PROVIDE ADA COMPLIANT GALVANIZED HANDRAILS.

007

NEW 12"x 12" DRAIN WITH SUMP- TIE INTO EXISTING PERIMETER DRAIN SYSTEM

008

NEW WORK STATION COUNTER @ 30" AFF. AWI CUSTOM GRADE LAMINATED COUNTERTOP. LENGTH AS INDICATED ON DRAWINGS. PROVIDE 3" BACKSPLASH. PROVIDE PLASTIC GROMMETS.

009

RELOCATE EXISTING COUNTER ON WOOD STUD WALLFROM ROOM 117. LOCATE IN FIELD PER OWNER.

010

RELOCATE EXISTING REFRIDGERATOR TO PROVIDE 32" CLEARANCE TO COUNTER. REMOVE ADJACENT COUNTER. NEW 48"x48" WOOD FRAME TEMPERED GLASS WINDOWS IN EXISTING WOOD FRAMED WALL. SEE DETAILS ON SHEET A4. PROVIDE 5 ADJUSTABLE SHELVES ON 72" STANDARDS

013

REMOVE ALUMINUM JAMB EXTENSIONS FROM EXISTING WINDOW AND PROVIDE NEW VP RETURN. REMOVE EXISTING STOOL. PROVIDE NEW SOLID SURFACE STOOL WITH 4" APRON. COLOR: WILSONART GIBRALTAR MIDNIGHT MELANGE. SEE DETAIL 1 ON SHEET A2.

014

NEW HVAC CLOSET. COORDINATE SIZE WITH SPECIFIED EQUIPMENT.

015

ALL EXISTING UTILITY CONDUITS ALONG WALL TO RECEIVE STRUCTURAL UPGRADE ARE TO BE RELOCATED TO PLANE OF NEW WALL PANELS MAY BE FRAMED IN PLACE WITH STRUCTURAL HEADERS AT CONTRACTORS OPTION.

016

WHERE EXISTING VINYL FABRIC WALL COVERINGS HAVE BEEN REMOVED, PROVIDE SKIM COAT OF VENEER PLASTER OVER AFFECTED WALL SURFACE, BLEND INTO EXISTING.

017

PROVIDE NEW WALL TO WALL CARPET.

018

EXISTING WOOD KNEE WALL TO BE REFURBISHED. REPAIR DEFECTS, SAND, PRIME, AND PAINT. EXISTING WINDOW BLINDS TO REMAIN.

019

NEW ADA COMPLIANT CONCRETE LANDING AND SIDEWALK.

020

3'-6" x 2' CLERESTORY WINDOWS, 6'-8' A.F.F INSTALL STAINED GLASS WINDOWS FURNISHED BY OWNER. PROVIDE BACK LIGHTING AND ACCESS TO LIGHT FIXTURES.

021

MODIFY EXISTING BASE CABINENT AS SHOWN; ADD END PANEL. PROVIDE NEW SOLID COUNTERTOP. UPPER CABINET TO REMAIN. EXISTING SINK TO REMAIN.

022

023

NEW RANGE HOOD, RECONNECT TO EXISTING EXHAUST DUCT

024

NEW COUNTER CABINETS AND SINK. MICROWAVE AND COFFEE MACHINE N.I.C.

025

PROVIDE 30 AMP ELECTRICAL CIRCUIT FOR COPIER & NEW LOCATION FOR MAIL BOXES BY OWNER AT ROOM 023

026

4" CMU CMU WALL OFFSET TO AVOID PUMP PAD

LEGEND BRK

EXPOSED BRICK TO REMAIN UNFINISHED

CPT

CARPET

M PT

12"x12" SIMULATED MARBLE PAINT

SUSPENDED ACOUSTIC CEILING

TRANSPARENT STAIN AND FINISH

TILE

12"x12" PORCELAIN CERAMIC TILE

VINYL COVE BASE

VCT

VINYL COMPOSITION TILE WOOD

WDSC

WOOD SOLID CORE

CURTAIN WALL

EXISTING TO REMAIN

PROJECT NO: 707

- OMIT T' HAD

107

PROVIDE NEW ADA COMPLIANT STEEL HANDRAILS, PTD.

006

HARDWARE SETS GENERAL: PROVIDE REMOVABLE CORE LOCK CYLINDERS; PROVIDE MASTER AND GRANDMASTER KEYING; COORDINATE KEYING WITH OWNER. LOCKSETS TO BE SARGENT 8200 SERIES. CYLINDERS TO BE BY SARGENT 10 LINE. RE-KEY ALL EXISTING LOCKSETS TO REMAIN TO NEW KEYING SYSTEM. HARDWARE FINISHES: SATIN CHROMIUM OR SATIN STAINLESS. SET #1 REUSE EXISTING HARDWARE, EXCEPT LOCKSET. PROVIDE NEW LOCKSET WITH LEVER HANDLE TO COMPLY WITH 780 CMR 11 - ACCESSIBILITY. PROVIDE OFFICE FUNCTION. SET #2 3 PAIR BALL BEARING HINGLES LEVER HANDLE LOCKSET W/ OFFICE FUNCTION ACTIVE LEAF THROUGH BOLT INACTIVE LEAF SET #3 SAME AS SET #1 EXCEPT WITH PASSAGE FUNCTION LOCKSET SET #4 1 1/2 PAIR BALL BEARING BUTT HINGES HEAVY DUTY LEVER HANDLE MORTISE LOCKSET, OFFICE FUNCTION FLOOR DOOR STOP 3 RUBBER PLUG SILENCERS SET #5 1 1/2 PAIR BALL BEARING BUTT HINGES HEAVY DUTY LEVER HANDLE MORTISE LOCKSET HEAVY DUTY PARALLEL ARM CLOSER FULL PERIMETER NEOPRENE WEATHERSTRIPPING, REPLACEABLE THRESHOLD: EXTRUDED ALUMINUM, THERMALLY BROKEN 3 RUBBER PLUG TYPE SILENCERS

005

CPT CPT

PROVIDE NEW 60"UNIT KITCHEN. INCLUDE SINK, UNDERCOUNTER REFRIDGERATOR, AND MICROWAVE. FINISH MATERIAL TO BE SELECTED BY OWNER FROM MANUFACTURER'S PREMIUM OPTIONS. DWYER KITCHENS MODEL # SW060NFR OR EQUAL.

CHAIR RAIL - SEE DETAIL SHEET A4

211a 211b

NEW SOLID WOOD CASED STEEL PAN STAIR WITH SOLID STONE TREADS. TILE RISERS AND LANDINGS. SEE DETAILS ON SHEET A5.

004

012

106

PREFABRICATED WOOD COLUMN COVER. DIAMETER 10". PROVIDE BASE AND CAPITAL. PAINTED.

003

011

028

104

002

PAINT ALL METAL SURFACES OF STAIR STRUCTURE/ * NEW ENTRY MAT

101 103

NEW COUNTERTOP @ 42" & COMPUTER CABINETS BELOW. AWI CUSTOM GRADE WOOD CABINETS WITH LAMINATED COUNTERTOP. WOOD SPECIES TO BE CHERRY WITH STAINED FINISH. LENGTH AS INDICATED ON DRAWINGS.

* PROVIDE TILE WAINSCOT 48" HIGH BEHIND MOP SINK

029

214

WDSC

TYPE 3 SINGLE LEAF -M.O.

PT X

213

NO.

WDSC

TYPE 2 DOUBLE LEAF

PT X

WDSC

TYPE 1 SINGLE LEAF

PT X

STORAGE

SERVER ROOM

SEE SCHED.

PT X

IT DIRECTOR

015

115

OFFICE

014

SEE SCHEDULE

SA X

1 3/4"

SEE SCHED.

CPT

1 3/4"

CPT

1 3/4"

SITE GLASS

1 3/4"

6'-8"

G GLASS

6'-8"

HG HALF GLASS

TECH WORKROOM

6'-8"

FLUSH

COMMON

011

6'-8"

010

3'-0"

DOOR TYPES

PT X

3'-0"

5 1/2"

VCT

3'-0"

PT PT

3'-0"

PT PT

PT X

1 1 4

SEE NOTE #1

NEW GLASS DOOR (G) IN EXISTING FRAME FILL IN PANELS, CHERRY VENEER 1 SIDE

CPT

PT X

NEW DOOR IN EXISTING FRAME

PT X

3 2

EXISTING DOOR TO BE REFURBISHED

OPEN OFFICE

SA SA

EXISTING DOOR TO REMAIN EXISTING DOOR TO BE REFURBISHED

REMARKS

VC X

MENS ROOM

MAT'L. FINISH

STORAGE

HARDWARE SET NO.

FROM

6'-8"

BROTHERS BUILDING RENOVATIONS, J:\01 Projects\11003 - St Johns HS-Brothers Building\6 - Deliverables\Model\St Johns - Brothers Redesign030311.pln; Wednesday, March 09, 2011; 12:07 PM

DOOR SCHEDULE

DOORS LOCATION

VCT

WOMEN'S ROOM

019

NO.

PT PT

BUSINESS OFFICE

SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"

PT PT

114

018

GROUND LEVEL FLOOR PLAN

PT PT

201

PT PT

113

EXIST. WALKWAY

REFECTORY 025

009

CPT

PT PT

116

OPEN OFFICE 007

PT PT

112

017

CPT X

PT PT

ALUMNI DIRECTOR

VESTIBULE 022

004

EXIST. CABINET

KITCHEN 020

ELEV MACH 021

NEW COPIER NIC

012

025

PT PT

WORK ROOM WC

DIR. OF ADVANCEMENT

105

006 007

NEW REFRIG. & STOVE, NIC.

ELEVATOR

013

023

KITCHEN CLOSET 024

022

EXISTING CABINETS

X1 3'-0"

016 5' MIN VIF

005 016

MENS 008

10'-6 1/2"

CORRIDOR 009

STAIR 026

024 012

A A4

FACULTY LUNCH 018

003

023

REFRIGERATORS FROM ROOM 010

6'-2" C UNISEX HCWC 017

STORAGE 015

011

CPT

MENS WC

022

9'-10"

EQ.

020

CPT

CORRIDOR

013

OFFICE 012

009

012

016

SHREWSBURY, MA

FLOOR PLAN NOTES 001

RENOVATIONS TO BROTHERS BUILDING

X1 CORRIDOR 012

NOTES *NEW ENTRY MAT

GMP SET

SERVER RM. 013

TECH. WORKROOM 011

ANNUAL FUND

CPT X

008

FOR BID - REVISED

007

002

CEILING

3/6/ 11

015

BASE

6/ 18 / 09

006

FLOOR

PREPARED FOR: ST. JOHNS HIGH SCHOOL

005

FOR BID

004

REVISIONS - ALT 1

003

DESCRIPTION

BLOCK IN WINDOW W/ 6" CMU AND FACE BRICK

002

VESTIBULE

NEW PARTITION OR STRUCTURAL WALL

DATE

F ELEC PANEL AREA 027

001

WALLS

ROOM NAME

# 4 EXISTING 6" ELECTRICAL CONDUITS

EXISTING PARTITION TO REMAIN

2/ 2 / 09

ROOM

SPRINKLER RM. 028

001

LEGEND

SAW CUT SLAB AS REQUIRED FOR WALL FOOTING REMOVE GAS LINE TO DRYER. REROUTE GAS LINE TIGHT TO CEILING AND RELOCATE WALL PENETRATION.

10/ 20 / 08

SIM. PLYWOOD FINISH

EXISTING 6" FIRE SUPPRESSION SERVICE

10'-0"

12'-6"

ROOM FINISH SCHEDULE

EXISTING 8" SEWER MAIN ALONG FLOOR

026

EXISTING COLUMNS

MARK

F MECH. ROOM 029

GROUND LEVEL FLOOR PLAN AND SCHEDULES

NOTE #1 - EXISTING DOOR, FRAME, AND HINGES TO REMAIN. WOOD DOOR TO BE STRIPPED, SANDED, AND STAINED. REPAIR IMPERFECTIONS IN WOOD AND GLAZING. REMOVE EXISTING DOOR HARDWARE AND REPLACE WITH NEW LEVER HANDLE LOCKSET. NOTE #2 - NEW PAIR OF SOLID CORE FLUSH WOOD DOORS IN EXISTING FRAME.

A1 SHEET _3_ of 11

CONSTRUCTION FIELD REPORTS I attended site visit and construction meeting every other week as the high school’s Brother’s Building was being renovated. These visit included documenting the state of construction and advising the owner or contractor concerning questions that arose during the process. After the meetings I wrote up field reports to address the issues that were covered in the meeting or on site.

FIELD REPORT #02

WM PROJECT: 11003 - St Johns HS-Brothers Building 378 Main Street Shrewsbury, MA DATE: 23 June 2011

FIELD REPORT #03 BUILDING PERMIT NO.: 11-197 WM PROJECT: 11003 - St Johns HS-Brothers Building 378 Main St. Shrewsbury, MA DATE: 7 July 2011

TIME: 10:45 - 11:45PM WEATHER: Overcast and misting rain TEMP. RANGE: 65° - 70° EST. % OF COMPLETION: 30% CONFORMANCE WITH SCHEDULE: (+, -) PRESENT AT SITE: Superintendent, Demolition, Plumber, Pipe Fitters, Framers, Electrician, Insulation Installers WORK IN PROGRESS: Mechanical, Electrical, Plumbing, Carpentry, Demolition, Insulation ITEMS TO VERIFY: N/A INFORMATION OR ACTION REQUIRED: N/A ATTACHMENTS: see photos

Soffit Framing at 1st Floor Lobby

Exterior rail and canopy to detail

TIME: 9:00AM-11:00AM WEATHER: Clear skies TEMP. RANGE: 75° - 84° EST. % OF COMPLETION: 50% CONFORMANCE WITH SCHEDULE: (+, -) PRESENT AT SITE: Superintendent, Electricians, HVAC Installer, Tile Installer WORK IN PROGRESS: HVAC Installation, Electrical, tile installation, elevator shaft wall installation, interior stair under construction ITEMS TO VERIFY: detailing at canopy and exterior railing INFORMATION OR ACTION REQUIRED: N/A ATTACHMENTS: see photos

REPORTED BY: Darian Mason – Watermark, Inc.

OBSERVATIONS:

REPORTED BY: Darian Mason – Watermark, Inc.

The installation of partition framing for all floors of the building was in progress.

I.T. work for cables through the building was in progress.

Insulation installation on First Floor was in progress.

Framing interior partitions was in progress.

Asbestos removal at Ground Floor, Room 007 has been completed.

Installation of interior ornamental stair was in progress.

Demolition of bathroom fixtures at Ground Floor, Rooms 006 and 007 is underway.

Installation of HVAC ducts was under way.

Sprinkler pipe fitters working at Ground Floor and First Floor.

Framing of partitions for Rooms 006 and 007 is in progress.

Verified restroom width met accessibility per plans.

Electricians are currently working at ground floor to install conduit.

CMU Wall at New Stair Opening in Lobby OBSERVATIONS:

Ornamental stair at First Level

CONSTRUCTION SKETCHES

C 1'-6" TYP.

CEILING @ 8'-4" (TYP.) G

CEILING @ 8'-4" (TYP.)

SOFFIT @ 8'-0" (TYP.)

SUPPLY DIFFUSER

SUPPLY DIFFUSER IN WALL C

PREPARED FOR:St. John's High School

CEILING @ 8'-4" (TYP.)

G C

SOFFIT AT SUSP. CEILING

378 MAIN STREET SHREWSBURY, MA #Post

SOFFIT @ 7'-8" (TYP.)

WAITING 103

BROTHERS BUILDING RENOVATIONS

1'-6"

5'-0"

13'-10"

LOBBY 102

SOFFIT @ 8'-0" (TYP.) G

6'-0" 9'-0"

PROJECT NO: 11003

CONFERENCE ROOM 105

SCREEN

FIRST LEVEL FLOOR PLAN

FIRST LEVEL RCP

SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"

DATE:

10 JUN 2011

DRAWN BY:

DGM

CHK'D BY:

POB

FIRST FLOOR DETAIL

LEGEND 4" FLUORESCENT DOWNLIGHT G 0

SK-01

REV. 1 SHEET 1 of 1

ADD HEATER

1'-6" TYP. C

CEILING @ 8'-4" (TYP.)

LOBBY 102

9'-0"

CEILING @ 8'-4" (TYP.)

SOFFIT @ 8'-0" (TYP.) G

MOUNTED DISPLAY MONITOR

6'-0"

1'-6"

WALL MOUNTED EXIT SIGN OVER DOOR

1'-6"

CEILING @ 8'-4" (TYP.)

C C

SUPPLY DIFFUSER IN WALL C

SOFFIT AT SUSP. CEILING

PREPARED FOR:St. John's High School

5'-0"

SOFFIT @ 8'-0" (TYP.)

378 MAIN STREET SHREWSBURY, MA #Post

SOFFIT @ 7'-8" (TYP.)

WAITING 103

SUPPLY DIFFUSER

ADD HEATER

BROTHERS BUILDING RENOVATIONS

13'-10"

In this example, the layout of the entry lobby needed to be provided since there was a change in the room size and the use of a decorative wall. This required changing the lighting layout as well as providing a diagram to show there was adequate space in the lobby for visitors.

BROTHERS BUILDING RENOVATIONS, J:\01 Projects\11003 - St Johns HS-Brothers Building\6 - Deliverables\Model\St Johns - Brothers Redesign030311.pln; Monday, June 27, 2011; 9:36 AM

Some of the meeting and site visits required follow-up with more information or changes to the design. I was responsible for sketching and drafting up these design changes.

BROTHERS BUILDING RENOVATIONS, J:\01 Projects\11003 - St Johns HS-Brothers Building\6 - Deliverables\Model\St Johns - Brothers Redesign030311.pln; Friday, June 10, 2011; 4:51 PM

C MOUNTED DISPLAY MONITOR

1'-6"

WALL MOUNTED EXIT SIGN OVER DOOR

PROJECT NO: 11003

CONFERENCE ROOM 105

SCREEN

FIRST LEVEL FLOOR PLAN

FIRST LEVEL RCP

SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"

4" FLUORESCENT DOWNLIGHT

145

27 JUN 2011

DRAWN BY:

DGM

CHK'D BY:

POB

FIRST FLOOR DETAIL

LEGEND G

DATE:

SK-01 REV. 2 SHEET 1 of 1

CONSTRUCTION SKETCHES 4"

± 11'-3"

3'-6"

STORAGE 006

6'-1" MIN. CLEAR

4'-0" 4'-0"

4'-1"

1'-0"

WORK ROOM 005

1'-0"

3'-6"

4'-0"

10'-8" SERVICE CLEARANCE

GROUND LEVEL RCP

SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"

DRAWN

CHK'D BY

N 0

6'-1" MIN. CLEAR

7'-8"

3'-6"

6'-1" MIN.

CLEAR

3'-6"

8'-8" 1'-6"

1'-0"

3'-6"

16'-1"

3'-6"

1'-6"

COPIER 80" X 37"

10'-8" 1'-6"

1'-6"

WOMENS 008

4'-8"

8'-8"

COPIER 80" X 37"

9'-0" 6'-5"

15'-8" 8'-5"

WORK ROOM 005

10'-8"

WORK ROOM 005

15'-8"

15'-8" 6'-2"

5'-2"

6'-2"

5'-2"

PREPARED FOR:St. John's High School

6'-5"

10'-8"

GRO FLO DET

3'-0"

WOMENS 008

1'-0"

COPIER 80" X 37" 8'-5"

WORK ROOM 005

3'-0" 6'-8" 6'-5"

10'-9"

3'-6"

PROJEC DATE:

3'-8"

1'-0"

PREPARED FOR:St. John's High School

GROUND FLOOR W.C.

1'-6"

STORAGE CABINETS

REMOVE DOOR

6'-1" MIN. CLEAR

3'-6"

7'-4"

s\11003 - St Johns HS-Brothers Building\6 - Deliverables\Model\St Johns - Brothers Redesign030311.pln; Wednesday, June 08, 2011; 4:00 PM

MENS 008

TIE INTO EXISTING

ADD SPRINKLER HEAD COPIER 80" X 37"

3'-0"

4'-7"

A F

1'-6"

(5) SHELVES ON HEAVY DUTY ADJUSTABLE BRACKETS AND STANDARDS

CEILING MOUNTED 1 X 4 FLORESCENT

RELOCATE PIPE

6'-5"

In this example the copy room layout was affected as a restroom was changed by the owner into an accessible toilet. The changes needed to provide an accessible bathroom as well as a workable copy room. I sketched and drafted multiple options for the owner to chose.

SHELVES

BROTHERS BUILDING RENOVATIONS, J:\01 Projects\11003 - St Johns HS-Brothers Building\6 - Deliverables\Model\St Johns - Brothers Redesign030311.pln; Tuesday, June 21, 2011; 12:50 PM

3'-0" MENS 008

GROUND FLOOR W.C.

W.C. ALTERNATE 1

W.C. ALTERNATE 2

PRO

SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"

DATE

DRA

CHK

CONSTRUCTION SKETCHES In this example, an existing stair railing was found to be not in compliance with accessiblity rules and needed to be redesigned. Again, I sketched and drafted multiple options for the owner to chose from.

NEW GUARD RAIL

FACE OF BUILDING

NEW COLUMN AND COLUMN COVER

EXISTING GUARD RAIL TO REMAIN

GUARD RAIL CUT BACK TO EXISTING VERTICAL POST

GUARD RAIL CUT BACK AND WELDED TO NEW VERTICAL POST

ANCHOR NEW POST

SCHEME A

SCHEME B

SCHEME C

SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"

FACE OF BUILDING NEW GUARD RAIL AND HAND RAIL

BROTHERS BUILDING

ANCHOR NEW POST

NEW GUARD RAIL WELDED TO EXISTING VERTICAL POST EXISTING HAND RAIL TO REMAIN

EXISTING HAND RAIL TO REMAIN

NEW COLUMN AND COLUMN COVER

FACE OF BUILDING

ANCHOR NEW POST

SCHEME D SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"

378 MAIN STREET SHREWSBURY, MA #Post

NEW COLUMN AND COLUMN COVER

EXISTING GUARD RAIL TO REMAIN

PREPARED FOR:St. John's High School

BROTHERS BUILDING RENOVATIONS, J:\01 Projects\11003 - St Johns HS-Brothers Building\6 - Deliverables\Model\St Johns - Brothers Redesign030311.pln; Monday, July 11, 2011; 12:50 PM

FACE OF BUILDING

BROTHERS BUILDING RENOVATIONS, J:\01 Projects\11003 - St Johns HS-Brothers Building\6 RENOVATIONS - Deliverables\Model\St Johns - Brothers Redesign030311.pln; Monday, July 11, 2011; 12:50 PM

NEW COLUMN AND COLUMN COVER EXISTING GUARD RAILTO REMAIN

PROJECT NO: 11003 DATE:

NEW GUARD RAIL IN LINE WITH HAND RAIL

STRUCTURAL COLUMN

COLUMN COVER

REMOVE EXISTING GUARD RAIL

SCHEME A

SCHEME B

SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"

REMOVE EXISTING GUARD RAIL

147

SCHEME C SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"

EXISTING GUARD RAIL TO REMAIN

11 JUL 2011

DRAWN BY:

DGM

CHK'D BY:

POB

EXTERIOR STAIR AND RAILING OPTIONS

SK-05 SHEET 1 of 2

SCHEME D SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"

REMOVE EXISTING HAND RAIL; INSTALL NEW HAND RAIL AND GUARD RAIL STRUCTURAL COLUMN COLUMN COVER

REMOVE EXISTING GUARD RAIL

149

The Hartwell Court Housing Complex is in need of remediation as the exterior siding and roofing has failed in many points around the complex. The Flanagan Complex is to undergo renovation and with seven different model types, the plans need to be a worksheet and record of all unit types with their reverse layout. My responsibility in these projects was to investigate the site with field measurements and photographs. Then, I drafted Hartwell Complex elevations and floor plans for the Flanagan Complex for construction drawings.

151

term: FALL 2011- PRESENT location: LOWELL, MA

The Lowell Housing Authority works to provide safe and affordable housing at low cost to residence of Lowell. They have many units across the city ranging in age from 30 years to units made this year.

practice: LOWELL HOUSING AUTHORITY

LOWELL HOUSING AUTHORITY: TEMPLE STREET AND THE FLANAGAN COMPLEX

HARTWELL COURT RENOVATIONS These elevations and plans were previously drafted in design development and needed to be edited for construction drawings. I aligned the elevations with the plans and added the keynotes to the drawings.

03 08 09

Much of the buildings do not have gutters and heavy rainfall falls right into weak spots on the face of the building. We designed details that would flash these potential weak spots and that would provide gutters for all roof eaves.

01 02 03 08 09

CONTINUOUS ROOF VENT CONTINUOUS ROOF VENT ASPHALT SHINGLE ASPHALT SHINGLE

UNDERLAYMENT UNDERLAYMENT DRIP EDGE DRIP EDGE NEW 4" X 6" GUTTER SYSTEM, REFER TO NEW 4" X 6" GUTTER SYSTEM, REFER TO PLAN FOR DOWNSPOUT LOCATIONS PLAN FOR DOWNSPOUT LOCATIONS NEW 1/2" CDX PLYWOOD LAYER NEW 1/2" CDX PLYWOOD LAYER OVER EXISTING OVER EXISTING EXISTING 1/2" PLYWD. SHEATHING EXISTING 1/2" PLYWD. SHEATHING TO REMAIN TO REMAIN NEW PVC TRIM BOARD NEW PVC TRIM BOARD

BLOCKING AS REQUIRED BLOCKING AS REQUIRED WOOD FRAMING, EXISTING ROOF WOOD FRAMING, EXISTING ROOF RAFTER TO REMAIN RAFTER TO REMAIN NEW POLYMER CEDAR SHINGLE NEW POLYMER CEDAR SHINGLE

1/2" CDX PLYWOOD SHEATHING 1/2" CDX PLYWOOD SHEATHING

2 X 4 FRAMING @ 16" O.C. 2 X 4 FRAMING @ 16" O.C.

REPLACE WITH NEW PVC TRIM REPLACE WITH NEW PVC TRIM BOARD MATCH EXISTING DIMENSIONS. BOARD MATCH EXISTING DIMENSIONS.

ASPHALT SHINGLE ASPHALT SHINGLE

ROOF SHEATHING ROOF SHEATHING

KEYNOTES KEYNOTES 01

02 02

NEW POLYMER CEDAR SHINGLES NEW POLYMER CEDAR SHINGLES (SCALLOP PATTERN) (SCALLOP PATTERN) 12 1/2" CDX PLYWOOD SHEATHING 1/2" CDX PLYWOOD SHEATHING 13

07 10

ASPHALT SHINGLE ASPHALT SHINGLE METAL FLASHING METAL FLASHING NEW PVC TRIM BOARD: MATCH NEW PVC TRIM BOARD: MATCH EXISTING DIMENSIONS EXISTING DIMENSIONS

02 07 10

EXISTING ROOF FRAMING TO EXISTING ROOF FRAMING TO REMAIN REMAIN METAL FLASHING METAL FLASHING

NEW PVC TRIM BOARD. MATCH NEW PVC TRIM BOARD. MATCH EXISTING DIMENSIONS. EXISTING DIMENSIONS.

VINYL SOFFIT VINYL SOFFIT

POLYMER CEDAR SHINGLE POLYMER CEDAR SHINGLE

EXISTING COLUMN TO REMAIN EXISTING COLUMN TO REMAIN

SCALE: 1 1/2"=1'-0" 1 1 SCALE: 1 1/2"=1'-0"

SCALE: 1 1/2"=1'-0" 4 4 SCALE: 1 1/2"=1'-0"

ROOF/SOFFIT DETAIL ROOF/SOFFIT DETAIL

SCALE: 1 1/2"=1'-0" 7 7 SCALE: 1 1/2"=1'-0"

SECTION THROUGH GABLE ARCH SECTION THROUGH GABLE ARCH

RAKE DETAIL RAKE DETAIL

INSULATION INSULATION 02 03

2 X 4 FRAMING @ 16" O.C. 2 X 4 FRAMING @ 16" O.C.

14 13

NEW WINDOW. REFER TO SHEETS NEW WINDOW. REFER TO SHEETS A-201, A-202, A-203 A-201, A-202, A-203 SEALANT, CONTINUOUS PERIMETER SEALANT, CONTINUOUS PERIMETER NEW POLYMER CEDAR SHINGLES NEW POLYMER CEDAR SHINGLES

SECOND FLOOR SECOND FLOOR 12 1/2" CDX PLYWOOD SHEATHING 12 1/2" CDX PLYWOOD SHEATHING 19

16 15 19

REPAIR DAMAGED FRAMING: REPLACE REPAIR DAMAGED FRAMING: REPLACE DAMAGED 2 X 4 WD. BOTTOM PLATE DAMAGED 2 X 4 WD. BOTTOM PLATE INSULATION INSULATION AIR BARRIER AIR BARRIER REPAIR DAMAGED FRAMING: PROVIDE REPAIR DAMAGED FRAMING: PROVIDE SIMPSON LSU JOIST HANGAR OR EQUAL SIMPSON LSU JOIST HANGAR OR EQUAL REPLACE DAMAGED GWB REPLACE DAMAGED GWB

NEW POLYMER CEDAR SHINGLE NEW POLYMER CEDAR SHINGLE

METAL FLASHING METAL FLASHING

CONTINOUS ROOF VENT CONTINOUS ROOF VENT

01 02 08 10

ASPHALT SHINGLE ASPHALT SHINGLE

ROOF SHEATHING ROOF SHEATHING

VINYL SOFFIT VINYL SOFFIT

03 03

REMOVE AND REINSTALL BALUSTRADE REMOVE AND REINSTALL BALUSTRADE

14 18

SEALANT, CONTINUOUS PERIMETER SEALANT, CONTINUOUS PERIMETER

REPLACE DAMAGED GWB REPLACE DAMAGED GWB

1/2" CDX PLYWOOD SHEATHING 1/2" CDX PLYWOOD SHEATHING

2 X 4 FRAMING @ 16" O.C. 2 X 4 FRAMING @ 16" O.C.

NEW POLYMER CEDAR SHINGLES NEW POLYMER CEDAR SHINGLES

FIRST FLOOR FIRST FLOOR 16

15 10

14 21

INSULATION INSULATION

REPAIR DAMAGED FRAMING: REPLACE REPAIR DAMAGED FRAMING: REPLACE DAMAGED 2 X 4 WD. BOTTOM PLATE DAMAGED 2 X 4 WD. BOTTOM PLATE AIR BARRIER AIR BARRIER NEW PVC TRIM BOARD WATER NEW PVC TRIM BOARD WATER TABLE (1 X 4) TABLE (1 X 4) SEALANT SEALANT NEW PVC BOOT AND DOWN NEW PVC BOOT AND DOWN SPOUT SPOUT

15 10

14 21

02 22 08 09 17

TYPICAL WALL REPAIR DETAIL-GROUND LEVEL TYPICAL WALL REPAIR DETAIL-GROUND LEVEL SCALE: 1 1/2"=1'-0" SCALE: 1 1/2"=1'-0"

DRIP EDGE DRIP EDGE

PVC TRIM (1 X 10) PVC TRIM (1 X 10)

BLOCKING AT EACH RAFTER END BLOCKING AT EACH RAFTER END AS REQUIRED AS REQUIRED

NEW 1/2" CDX PLYWOOD OVER NEW 1/2" CDX PLYWOOD OVER EXISTING EXISTING

CONTINUOUS ROOF VENT WITH CONTINUOUS ROOF VENT WITH INSECT SCREEN INSECT SCREEN

ICE DAM PROTECTION FLASHING ICE DAM PROTECTION FLASHING DAM PROTECTION SHEET 03 ICEICE DAM PROTECTION SHEET UNDERLAYMENT UNDERLAYMENT METAL FLASHING SEALED TO 07 METAL FLASHING SEALED TO MEMBRANE MEMBRANE

FASCIA DETAIL FASCIA DETAIL SCALE: 1 1/2"=1'-0" SCALE: 1 1/2"=1'-0"

EPDM ROOFING EPDM ROOFING

CONTINUOUS ROOF VENT CONTINUOUS ROOF VENT ASPHALT SHINGLE ASPHALT SHINGLE UNDERLAYMENT: ICE DAM UNDERLAYMENT: ICE DAM PROTECTION SHEET PROTECTION SHEET NEW 1/2" CDX PLYWOOD LAYER NEW 1/2" CDX PLYWOOD LAYER OVER EXISTING OVER EXISTING EXISTING 1/2" PLYWD. SHEATHING EXISTING 1/2" PLYWD. SHEATHING TO REMAIN TO REMAIN ROOF SHEATHING: REMOVE EXISTING ROOF SHEATHING: REMOVE EXISTING DAMAGED SHEATHING AND PROVIDE DAMAGED SHEATHING AND PROVIDE NEW 5/8" SPAN RATED PLPYWOOD NEW 5/8" SPAN RATED PLPYWOOD SHEATHING. SHEATHING.

METAL FLASHING METAL FLASHING

METAL DRIP EDGE METAL DRIP EDGE

NEW 4" X 6" GUTTER SYSTEM, REFER TO NEW 4" X 6" GUTTER SYSTEM, REFER TO PLAN FOR DOWNSPOUT LOCATIONS PLAN FOR DOWNSPOUT LOCATIONS

NEW PVC TRIM BOARD. MATCH EXISTING NEW PVC TRIM BOARD. MATCH EXISTING DIMENSIONS DIMENSIONS 2 X 4 FRAMING @ 16" O.C. REPLACE 2 X 4 FRAMING @ 16" O.C. REPLACE WHERE DAMAGED WHERE DAMAGED 1/2" CDX PLYWOOD SHEATHING, 1/2" CDX PLYWOOD SHEATHING, REPLACE WHERE DAMAGED REPLACE WHERE DAMAGED NEW POLYMER CEDAR SHINGLES, 5" NEW POLYMER CEDAR SHINGLES, 5" EXPOSURE; PROVIDE UNDERLAYMENT IN EXPOSURE; PROVIDE UNDERLAYMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH MANUFACTURERS' ACCORDANCE WITH MANUFACTURERS' INSTRUCTIONS INSTRUCTIONS SEALANT (SEE SPEC.) SEALANT (SEE SPEC.)

AIR BARRIER (SEE SPEC.) AIR BARRIER (SEE SPEC.)

INSULATION: FIBERGLASS BATT, R-19 INSULATION: FIBERGLASS BATT, R-19 MINUMUM MINUMUM

BLOCKING AS REQUIRED BLOCKING AS REQUIRED REPLACE DAMAGED GWB: INCLUDE AIR REPLACE DAMAGED GWB: INCLUDE AIR BARRIER, REFER TO PLAN FOR EXTENTS (V.I.F.) BARRIER, REFER TO PLAN FOR EXTENTS (V.I.F.) REPAIR DAMAGED FRAMING: REPLACE REPAIR DAMAGED FRAMING: REPLACE 2 X 4 PLATE AND OTHER MEMBERS 2 X 4 PLATE AND OTHER MEMBERS WHERE DAMAGED. WHERE DAMAGED.

COMPOSITE DECKING: REMOVE ALL COMPOSITE DECKING: REMOVE ALL DECKING AND REPLACE WITH COMPOSITE DECKING AND REPLACE WITH COMPOSITE DECKING. DECKING. NEW PVC BOOT AND DOWN NEW PVC BOOT AND DOWN SPOUT. CONNECT TO EXISTING GROUND SPOUT. CONNECT TO EXISTING GROUND DRAINAGE SYSTEM. (V.I.F.) DRAINAGE SYSTEM. (V.I.F.) EPDM ROOFING: SEE SPEC. EPDM ROOFING: SEE SPEC. VINYL SOFFIT: PROVIDE VENTED SOFFIT VINYL SOFFIT: PROVIDE VENTED SOFFIT AT ALL EAVE VENTS. AT ALL EAVE VENTS. REMOVE AND RE-INSTALL BALUSTRADE: REMOVE AND RE-INSTALL BALUSTRADE: PROVIDE NEW PIPE SUPPORT, PROVIDE NEW PIPE SUPPORT, SECURELY ANCHORED TO STRUCTURAL SECURELY ANCHORED TO STRUCTURAL RAFTERS; FLASH WITH PREFABRICATED RAFTERS; FLASH WITH PREFABRICATED PIPE BOOT AND SEAL WATERTIGHT. PIPE BOOT AND SEAL WATERTIGHT.

C C L OF NEW POST NEW SLOPE: L OF NEW POST NEW SLOPE: ATTACHMENT 12 ATTACHMENT 1 12 1

REFER TO WINDOW DETAILS REFER TO WINDOW DETAILS

03 10

23 19

ASPHALT SHINGLE ASPHALT SHINGLE

EPDM ROOFING EPDM ROOFING

DRIP EDGE DRIP EDGE

GUTTER SYSTEM GUTTER SYSTEM

BLOCKING AS REQUIRED TO BLOCKING AS REQUIRED TO SUPPORT DECK SUPPORT DECK UNDERLAYMENT UNDERLAYMENT

03 10

23 19

1/2" GAP 1/2" GAP

Plot Date: 10/17/2011 1:15:47 PM File Path:J:\01 Projects\11028 - LHA-Hartwell Court\5 - Working Files\Drawings\Schematic Design\LHA A-DTL-301.dwg

153

SECTION THROUGH LOWER ROOF SECTION THROUGH LOWER ROOF SCALE: 1 1/2"=1'-0" SCALE: 1 1/2"=1'-0"

WOOD FRAMING, EXISTING ROOF WOOD FRAMING, EXISTING ROOF RAFTER TO REMAIN RAFTER TO REMAIN

TOP PLATE AND JOIST REPAIR DETAIL TOP PLATE AND JOIST REPAIR DETAIL SCALE: 1 1/2"=1'-0" SCALE: 1 1/2"=1'-0"

ASPHALT SHINGLE ASPHALT SHINGLE UNDERLAYMENT UNDERLAYMENT

METAL DRIP EDGE METAL DRIP EDGE NEW PVC TRIM BOARD NEW PVC TRIM BOARD MATCH EXISTING DIMENSIONS MATCH EXISTING DIMENSIONS 09 NEW 4" X 6" GUTTER SYSTEM NEW 4" X 6" GUTTER SYSTEM 08

01 06

NOTE: REMOVE EXISTING ELECTRICAL NOTE: REMOVE EXISTING ELECTRICAL AND FIN-TUBE HEATING TO ALLOW AND FIN-TUBE HEATING TO ALLOW FOR REPAIR. REINSTALL. FOR REPAIR. REINSTALL.

CONSULTANTS

LOWELL HOUSING AUTHORITY LOWELL HOUSING AUTHORITY

While most of the detailing work was not drafted or designed by me, the exposure to these drawings was helpful to understand how the buildings facade could have deteriorated so badly.

NEW PVC TRIM BOARD. MATCH NEW PVC TRIM BOARD. MATCH EXISTING DIMENSIONS EXISTING DIMENSIONS ROOF SHEATHING ROOF SHEATHING WOOD FRAMING, EXISTING ROOF WOOD FRAMING, EXISTING ROOF RAFTER TO REMAIN RAFTER TO REMAIN VINYL SOFFIT VINYL SOFFIT

REPAIR DAMAGED FRAMING: REPLACE WOOD REPAIR DAMAGED FRAMING: REPLACE WOOD BEAM WHERE DAMAGED, MATCH EXISTING. BEAM WHERE DAMAGED, MATCH EXISTING.

EXISTING COLUMN TO REMAIN EXISTING COLUMN TO REMAIN SECTION THROUGH RAILING/FLAT ROOF SECTION THROUGH RAILING/FLAT ROOF SCALE: 1 1/2"=1'-0" SCALE: 1 1/2"=1'-0"

FLASHING DETAIL FLASHING DETAIL N.T.S. N.T.S.

PROJECT PROJECT NO: 1 MODEL FIL MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY DRAWN BY: A CHK'D BY: CHK'D BY: P COPYRIGH COPYRIGHT WA

EXISTING RAILING AND SUPPORT EXISTING RAILING AND SUPPORT TO REMAIN TO REMAIN

REPAIR DAMAGED FRAMING REPAIR DAMAGED FRAMING

NEW PVC TRIM BOARD NEW PVC TRIM BOARD

COMPOSITE DECKING COMPOSITE DECKING

SHEET TIT SHEET TITLE

DE 10

WOOD FRAMING, EXISTING WOOD FRAMING, EXISTING SUPPORT TO REMAIN SUPPORT TO REMAIN SCALE: 1 1/2"=1'-0" 9 9 SCALE: 1 1/2"=1'-0"

DETAIL AT PORCH REPAIR DETAIL AT PORCH REPAIR

12"

SCALE: 1 1/2"=1' SCALE: 1 1/2"=1'

12"

A-A

S SHEE

FLANAGAN COMPLEX RENOVATION This project allowed me to become familiar with unit housing design and space planning and multiple units were all redesigned and updated to include new fixtures and equipment.

155

CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS In this project, we worked off of the existing documents to draft up the walls, windows, and doors of the units and then Watermark was responsible for specifying the millwork and fixtures that would furnish each unit. These drawings are meant to be quickly read and understood by the contractors who go into the units to perform the renovations. I was responsible for drafting 5 types of units and their alternates.

157

This concludes the professional portion of this portfolio.

DARIAN MASON MASTERS OF ARCHITECTURE II January 3, 2012

design portfolio:DARIAN G. MASON

name: program: segment: date: