XL
LM S
XS
David Mauricio Columbia University GSAPP MS.AUD 2019 Portfolio
DAVID MAURICIO dm3395@columbia.edu
05.2018—Present
EDUCATION Columbia University in the City of New York
Master of Science in Architecture and Urban Design, MS.AUD 19’ Graduate School of Architecture, Planning and Preservation (GSAPP) 08.2013—05.2018
Woodbury University Bachelor of Architecture
06.2012—08.2012
Southern California Institute of Architecture
DID Certificate(Design Immersion Days Summer Program)
07.2017—05.2018
WORK EXPERIENCE Architectural Designer, EMEF Arquitectura, Culver City
06.2015—05.2017
Architectural Intern, Steinberg Hart, Los Angeles
Responsibilities: Prepared project document sets for bidding and construction, renderings, 3D modeling in Revit Met with city departments for Plan Check to obtain permits
Full Time during summers and Part Time during school. Responsibilities: Revit construction detail drawings model making, design competition drawings, 2D & 3D drawings, 3D modelings, renderings. Research Project: Urban Campground; Modular housing for the homeless of Skid Row. Advisor: Simon Ha, Partner
08.2018—Present
ACADEMIC EXPERIENCE Civic Design Assistant, Center for Court Innovation, New York
Work with St. Nicolas Housing (NYCHA) to develop comprehensive design strategies to reducue crime and strengthen community engagement. 08.2018—Present
Urban Design Teaching Assistant, Columbia GSAPP ARCH 6850: Urban Design Studio II Faculty Coordinator: Lee Altman & Justin Moore A6830-1: The City and What it is Not Instructor: Dilip da Cunha
SKILLS Software Modeling: AutoCad, Grasshopper, GIS, Rhino 3D, Revit, SketchUp, Vray, 3Ds Max Adobe: After Effects, Illustrator, Photoshop, InDesign,Premiere Fabrication 3D Printing, Casting, Model Making, Welding, Woodworking,
Languages English, Spanish
Table of Contents
XL:
Region
Amplify Hudson
P. 4
L: City Archipelago P. 14 M:
Quarry
The Battle of San Rafael
P. 20
S:
Warehouse
Relay Interchange
P. 26
XS:
Museum
Eagle Rock Lantern
P. 32
Titan Student Union
P. 36
Student Center
MS.AUD
3
XL Region Urban Design Studio II: The Spaces Between Cities, Hudson Valley Partners: Mariam Hattab, Berke Kalemoglu, Ashley Louie, Ryan Pryandana Crits: Lee Altman, Jerome Haferd, Justin Moore, Michael Murphy, David Smiley Year: Fall 2018 Region is defined neither by a political boundary nor a physical area but, in the tradition of Patrick Geddes, the region is understood to be composed of non-contiguous territories defined by shared parameters, from soil types to income levels, from topography to zoning, from habitat to political or financial incentives, among many others. In this sense, a city is always part of a region, as a concentration and particularization of densities, ecologies, and economies of the larger territory. This studio focus on the complex relationships between and within cities in the urbanized area of the Hudson Valley. From drinking water, through fresh agricultural produce, to stone, cement, and other construction materials, the Hudson Valley provides much of the resources feeding the dense metropolitan areas of New York City and Albany.
4
Columbia University GSAPP | Architecture & Urban Design | 2019
MS.AUD
5
6
Columbia University GSAPP | Architecture & Urban Design | 2019
In order to encourage inclusive ownership of place, Amplify Hudson partners with local news sources and community
Engagement in the collective input and the amplified output of local voices will connect the City of Hudson to
organizations to mobilize citizens as advocating authors, editors, and producers of their own media.
the waterfront and allow residents to equitably reclaim the main street of Hudson as an inclusive place
MS.AUD
7
Amplify Hudson celebrates the diverse voices of the city and the valley and envisions a democratic space which empowers individuals and encourages inclusive community
8
Everyday media production is integrated with educational opportunities to empower resident advocacy and skill set improvement.
Columbia University GSAPP | Architecture & Urban Design | 2019
MS.AUD
9
In response to what many residents see as poor communication, Amplify Hudson uses media as a platform to catalyze and create spaces for community engagement that unite people with each other and to the waterfront. Amplify Hudson partners with consists of a Media Workshop, a Civic Platform, and a waterfront reflection overlook.
10
Columbia University GSAPP | Architecture & Urban Design | 2019
MS.AUD
11
Amplify Hudson provides an equitable strategy to communicate with and represent its people. Residents deserve the right to greater transparency in decision-making and improved access to community resources. Participatory journalism provides a vehicle for citizens to democratically voice their opinions and to exercise their first amendment rights to the freedom of speech, press, assembly, and petition.
12
Columbia University GSAPP | Architecture & Urban Design | 2019
MS.AUD
13
L City Urban Design Studio I: New York; 5 Boroughs Partners: Carolina Godinho, Junyu Cao Crits: Hayley Eber, Kaja Kuhl, Sagi Golan, Austin Sakong Year: Summer 2018 New York City, the most populous and the most urban of America’s cities is the testing grounds of this studio as a laboratory to explore and experiment with tools, techniques, and strategies to develop a design methodology, where research and spatial investigation inform an argument As a post-industrial city it offers a multitude of areas for transforming the urban environment in order to support the city to face the challenges of the 21st century. Thinking about the city as a series of systems of hard and soft infrastructure and the people that live, work and benefit from these systems in New York City requires a multi-scalar approach to urban design in which we recognize global and regional forces on human-scale. Working in multiple scales and across different time frames became an integral part of this process to design an intervention that follows a speculative argument for the future of the City
14
Columbia University GSAPP | Architecture & Urban Design | 2019
Investigating existing urban thresholds in Staten Island
MS.AUD
15
EXISTING LANDMARK
INBETWEEN SEA
EXISTING TRAVEL TRIAL
PARKING LOT
PROPOSAL SITE
UNUTILIZED GREEN SPACE
CONNECTION
Ever since the Cromwell Center in Staten Island closed in 2010 the community witness a decrease in recreational space and activities. The new developments along the North Shore have been a boost to Staten Island, but don’t address the residents need. Community members have been advocating to bring back a community center that would give children and families a place to play. Rather than creating another recreational building, could we rediscover existing spaces in Staten Island?
16
Columbia University GSAPP | Architecture & Urban Design | 2019
MS.AUD
17
18
Columbia University GSAPP | Architecture & Urban Design | 2019
MS.AUD
19
M Quarry Degree Project: The Battle of San Rafael Rock Quarry Crits: Berenika Boberska, Scrap Marshall Year: Spring 2018 Woodbury University
We are constantly redeveloping and rewriting the constructed environment around us. The evidence and remains of what came before us, as inscribed in the roots of the landscape, are often forgotten. The memories and historical layers of the place which connect us to the landscape vanish and are often replaced by new development. One concept that reveals the trace of time is that of the Palimpsest - the layering of past moments in space and physical fabric to create an architecture of memory. This thesis will enact a fictional battle between a historian and a developer as they question the rules of a new mixed-use development in a disused rock quarry - to find new relationships to traces and uses within the landscape. The battlefield is a testing ground for a radical conservation of disturbed landscapes such as quarries.
20
Columbia University GSAPP | Architecture & Urban Design | 2019
MS.AUD
21
Site Strategy drawing definding the political boundries that landuse regulations restrcicts.
22
Columbia University GSAPP | Architecture & Urban Design | 2019
MS.AUD
23
24
Columbia University GSAPP | Architecture & Urban Design | 2019
MS.AUD
25
S Warehouse 3B Structure: Relay Interchange Partner: Jason Bravo Crit: Eric Olsen Year: Spring 2016
The infrastructural heart of Los Angeles are its freeways. Congested or not they facilitate the mobility of vehicles and its hosts. The primary function of this system is movement and any minor change in flow causes long spanning effect of congestion. Therefore, it is important to have each vehicle consistently moving at equal rate. The simple notion of how a freeway works serves as a precedent for mobility, infrastructure, and program towards the development of a drone delivery tower. To maximize mobility, a drone must move to its designated destination, with no interruptions, from point A to B. Working in different scales, the truck, package and drones must all synchronize in motion to keep the flow of traffic ongoing. Any slight delay from any of the three scales would be detrimental to the entire system.
26
Columbia University GSAPP | Architecture & Urban Design | 2019
MS.AUD
27
28
Columbia University GSAPP | Architecture & Urban Design | 2019
MS.AUD
29
Interior interconnected systems that function in a warehouse are seen in various levels of the atrium. The warehouse no longer is a linear space, rather an interwoven set of elements that synchronize in motion.
30
Columbia University GSAPP | Architecture & Urban Design | 2019
MS.AUD
31
XS Museum 4A Systems : Eagle Rock Lantern Crit: Robert Kerr Year: Fall 2016
Eagle rock is a neighborhood perceived as a quiet and safe place but in reality it’s dark and dangerous. The site is situated between a commercial area that is well illuminated, but as one gets closer to the site, it becomes darker . The street lights begin to fade away closer to the site, the site becomes a dark empty hole and one can raise the question, how safe is a neighborhood ? The building seeks to create an experience that reflects the environment that is Eagle Rock by addressing the site conditions and creating mirrored environments at unexpected moments in space.
32
Columbia University GSAPP | Architecture & Urban Design | 2019
MS.AUD
33
Circulation is pushed into the inside of the building, activating the courtyard and bringing people together. The courtyard no longer becomes an intermediate waiting space, but becomes the unifying element that connects visitors and residents.
34
Columbia University GSAPP | Architecture & Urban Design | 2019
MS.AUD
35
XS Student Center Titan Student Union, Steinberg Hart Critical Roles: Revit Construction Details, Interior Renders, Material Finishes, Presentation Drawings
Originally built in 1976, the Titan Student Union (TSU) is a mainstay of the Cal State Fullerton campus. Most students—commuter or residential—pass by or through the building each day. In 2012, a student governing board led the charge to improve the aging campus hub, revealing that they had saved years of student body fees and could fund and oversee an expansion. Student representatives expressed two primary objectives: To connect students to each other, while connecting the building to the campus. The new 27,000 SF addition creates a front door experience for the campus community. The triple-height atrium, which includes a below-grade expansion, integrates the variety of activities within one dynamic space.
36
Columbia University GSAPP | Architecture & Urban Design | 2019
Drawings done with Revit.
MS.AUD
37
38
Columbia University GSAPP | Architecture & Urban Design | 2019
MS.AUD
39
XL
LM S
XS