DAVID BURNS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE PORTFOLIO
CONTENTS BEYOND BOUNDARIES
CONCEPTUAL DEVELOPMENT
FIRST YEAR STUDIO - RIVERDALE PARK
REGENERATIVE LANDSCAPES FIRST YEAR STUDIO - HIGH PARK
PERMEATING LANDSCAPES SECOND YEAR STUDIO - DUFFERIN GROVE
HYDRAULIC INTERFACES SECOND YEAR STUDIO - NEW ORLEANS
NISSOLOGICAL CODES
THIRD YEAR STUDIO - KEY WEST, FLORIDA
SITE OF CONVEYANCE
MASTER’S THESIS - WINNIPEG, MANITOBA
WATERFRONT ACCESSWAY SITE TECHNOLOGIES
KING STREET WEST CONTEMPORARY URBAN ISSUES
ECOLOGICAL TRANSECTS FIELD ECOLOGY
RIPARIAN RESTORATION CONTEMPORARY
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
RIVERDALE PARK BEYOND
TORONTO, ONTARIO
WINTER 2012
BOUNDARIES
High Park is unlike any other habitat in the City of Toronto. Its 400 acres contain the most significant areas of original prairie and oak savannah communities in the Toronto region. Today only 1% of these original pre-settlement communities remain in all of Ontario, and therefore High Park is designated an Area of Natural and Scientific Interest. Due to its size and proximity to the Lake Ontario waterfront, High Park not only contains and attracts a diverse range of flora and fauna, it is also considered a destination park for the 1 million human visitors it recevies each year. The balance between the conflicting forces of ecological restoration and protection and human use is in dire need of attention. By losing half of its rare plant species over the past 90 years, one third of its nesting bird species over the last 50, and over half of its iconic Black Oaks in decline, High Park and the western waterfront must create a symbiotic relationship between human use and regeneration.
Allotment Gardens
Ramp and Terrace Mulching Facility
Water Filtration Channel
Tree Fields
Community + Shipping Hub Retention Ponds
Production Facility Greenhouses
Propagation Fields
HIGH PARK REGENERATIVE TORONTO, ONTARIO
WINTER 2012
LANDSCAPES
High Park is unlike any other habitat in the City of Toronto. Its 400 acres contain the most significant areas of original prairie and oak savannah communities in the Toronto region. Today only 1% of these original pre-settlement communities remain in all of Ontario, and therefore High Park is designated an Area of Natural and Scientific Interest. Due to its size and proximity to the Lake Ontario waterfront, High Park not only contains and attracts a diverse range of flora and fauna, it is also considered a destination park for the 1 million human visitors it recevies each year. The balance between the conflicting forces of ecological restoration and protection and human use is in dire need of attention. By losing half of its rare plant species over the past 90 years, one third of its nesting bird species over the last 50, and over half of its iconic Black Oaks in decline, High Park and the western waterfront must create a symbiotic relationship between human use and regeneration.
1851 Ecosystems Oak Savannah Oak Savannah (Present)
2012 Niagara Escarpment
Road Network Carolinian Forest Extent
Emerging Prairie (former Norway Maple Grove)
Ecological Learning Centre Streetcar Loop Emerging Oak Savannah (former recreation fields)
low
high
Emerging Hemlock Forest
high
(former dogpark and allotment gardens)
Allotment Gardens high
low
SLOPE
Performance Space
low
DISTURBANCE
EXPOSURE
Emerging Maple-Beech Forest (former hillside gardens)
DRY MEADOW
High Park Citizen’s Advisory
DRY MEADOW High Park Nature Centre
Sponge Garden DRY SAVANNAH
Volunteer Stewardship Program
HARDWOOD MIXED FOREST
Constructed Wetlands
City of Toronto Urban Forestry
MIXED DECIDUOUS FOREST City of Toronto Urban Forestry
MOIST LOWLAND FOREST
High Park Citizen’s Advisory Committee
Land Bridges MEADOW MARSH
High Park Nature Centre
Recreation Fields Consructed Marshlands SHALLOW MARSH
Toronto and Region Conservation Authority
Urban Beaches 1:4000 0m
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
tree removal and thinning
PREPARATION
soil regeneration
meadow planting
IMPLEMENTATION
sedge planting
reforestation marsh construction
SUCCESSION
DUFFERIN MALL PERMEATING TORONTO, ONTARIO
FALL 2012
LANDSCAPES
A simple glance of an aerial photograph of the Dufferin Mall site reveals a stark contrast between open space (green) and structure (grey). This spatial and programmatic segregation obstructs further or potential urban experiences whether it be at work, home, or at play. Dufferin Mall is often referred to as an informal community centre while Dufferin Grove proudly states it is a community centre without walls. By breaking the structural and formal barriers of these two disperate sites, a much richer and integrated entity transpires.
FORMAL CODES / OPERATIONS
1
CURRENT
mall typology simply defined in terms of large retail anchors connected by an enclosed armature of small stores.
6
BUNDLE
a community centre and library anchors the site to the north; bundling the armature. the armature transforms into a loop borrowing from the site’s history of a former race-track facility.
2
SPLIT
enclosed armature is split open or ‘day-lighted’ to allow exterior events to accumulate thus maximizing space functions.
7
EXTRUDE
3
PUSH
retail removed from the public street realm is pushed to dufferin street to animate and define the urban edge.
8
ANNEX
4
STITCH
existing street grid and context stitches the site together and defines blocks; establishing neighbourhood connections and cohesiveness.
9
DEPRESS
interior open spaces give way to further retail and offices creating a double corridor within.
the current running track to the northwest is annexed to provide a residential community.
semi-private permeable courtyards weave throughout the site connecting public and private spaces as well.
underground parking located under these buildings.
to compensate for lost greenspace, greenroofs are created instead.
light penetrating into courtyards naturally light units and provide interior views.
5
ANCHOR
a new broad retail armature is created that is anchored to the south by a new community recreation and fitness centre.
10
BRIDGE
lastly, further community anchors within dufferin grove bridge the two sites together and provide safe and accessable connections to form a cohesive site. the connections are primarily established through an elevated pedestrian and cycling network.
DESIGN SCHEMATICS ORGANIZATION
ZONES
anchor
residential
retail
residential
armature
commercial
park
community
BLOCKS
0
100
200
CIRCULATION
400 m
vehicular pedestrian
BUILDING TYPOLOGIES BLOCK
A
PERMEABLE PERIMETER
BLOCK
B
OPEN SPACES
HYDROLOGY
CONNECTED TERRACE
commercial/residential residential 75 units 105 m² unit size 11 m high (3 floors) 2200 m² courtyard single-loaded
42 residential units 8 commercial units 100 m² unit size R 240 m² unit size C 11 m high (3 floors) private terraces
park paths
circuit
drainage flow
PROGRAMMATIC LAYERS
PROGRAM METRICS COMMERCIAL
LEVEL 4
53,033 m²
OFFICE
19,434 m²
30%
11%
[35,000 m² > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 70,000 m²]
[15,000 m² > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 30,000 m²]
LEVEL 3
LEVEL 2
RESIDENTIAL
65,220 m²
COMMUNITY
11,530 m²
37%
7%
[50,000 m² > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >150,000 m²]
[10,000 m²> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >80,000 m²]
RECREATION
PARKING
LEVEL 1
GROUND LEVEL
14,470 m²
1280 spaces
9%
6%
[10,000 m² > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 40,000 m²]
[800 spaces > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1600 spaces]
UNDERGROUND
FAR
1.2
POPULATION
920
DENSITY
14 units/acre
commercial / office
gathering space
community centre / office
OPEN SPACE LAYERS
GREENROOFS + TERRACES [PRIVATE]
ELEVATED PEDESTRIAN NETWORK
PUBLIC PARKS SEMI-PUBLIC COURTYARDS
residential / retail
commercial / office
commercial / office
CITY PARK HYDRAULIC
NEW ORLEANS, LOUISIANNA
WINTER 2013
INTERFACES
Although waterbodies and waterways are prevelant in and around New Orleans, the relationship between the city and these features is extremely disconnected. The heavily engineered and controlled system of pumps, canals, and levees gives little breathing room for the natural function of these waterways. In the northwestern corner of Drainage Basin 1 where the 17th, Orleans, and London avenue canals drain into Lake Pontchartrain lies the most unique instance of this fragmented relationship. The canals traverse land that is amongst the most lowest and steadily subsiding in all of New Orleans as they rise above their surroundings encased in concrete for nobody to hardly notice. Moving forward, this study of
site and
type begins to scratch the surface between the interface of these outfall canals and their adjacencies.
FUNCTIONAL LAYERS Hydrology
Circulation
city park / orleans canal
roadways
bayou st. john
pathways
Program
Habitat
sports fields
marsh
dog park + equestrian
bottomland forest
golf course + trails
upland forest
1:5000 0
150
350 m
Lake Vista Neighbourhood
SPILLWAY 1
TYPICAL CONIDTION Three spillways radiating from a the truncated Orleans Avenue Canal begin the journey of water as it leaves Pump Station 7. There is a heirarchy of spillway function that corresponds to weather conditions where Spillway 1 circulates continously with water, Spillway 2 is utilized during frequent storms, and Spillway 3 is reserved for major, more destructive events. Each weaves amongst program and habitat restoration while allowing users to engage and become close to them, something ironically uncommon for a city surrounded by water. A spectacle is created when water emerges into the spillways through flood gates and water levels rise and fall. A new understanding of the role water has within this city is intended to be strengthened and celebrated. The journey ends at the northwest
corner of the park
where a proposed pump station then lifts the water back into the canal where it carries on to Lake Pontchartrain.
FLOOD CONDITION
SPILLWAY 2
TYPICAL CONIDTION
SPILLWAY 3
FLOOD CONDITION
TYPICAL CONIDTION
FLOOD CONDITION
CITY PARK RIPARIAN
NEW ORLEANS, LOUISIANNA
SPILLWAY ONE
WINTER 2013
PLANTING PLAN
0’ - 2’
2’ - 4’
4’ - 6’
6’ - 8’
RIPARIAN ZONE
CYPRESS + TUPLEO SWAMP
BOTTOMLAND FOREST
LIVE OAK + PALMETTO FOREST
9 lbs
11
10
7 lbs
40
6
7
11
6
9
4
Ai
Qp
Nb
Ig
Ll
Cl
Cl
Sr
Pt
Sm
Qv
Kv
Ll
Mr
Pc
5
63
13
50
4
30
16
27
25
5
7
34
Se
Sc
Qn
Fa
Nb
Mc
Td
Ll
Ca
Ga
Qh
Ll
7 lbs Co
9
23
7
6
8
16 lbs
6
Fp
Sr
Ls
Qh
Sm
Gv
Pt
Ps
Pv
Pf
Rh
PLANTING SCHEDULE RIPARIAN QUANTITY
CODE
BOTANICAL NAME
COMMON NAME
SIZE
SPACING
NOTES
13
Qn
Quercus nigra
Water Oak
15 gal. 1 1/2” -2” cal.
3 feet O.C.
container grown
11
Qp
Quercus phellos
Willow Oak
15 gal. 1 1/2” -2” cal.
3 feet O.C.
container grown
5
Se
Salix exigua
Sandbar Willow
6’ -8’ cuttings 1/2” cal.
12 feet O.C.
3 dozen stakes / bundle
50
Fa
Forestiera acuminata
Swamp Privet
3’ -4’ cuttings 1/4” cal.
3 feet O.C.
live stakes
63
Sc
Sambucus canadensis
American Elderberry
3’ -4’ cuttings 1/4” cal.
3 feet O.C.
live stakes
3 lbs seed
Ai
Asclepias incarnata
Swamp Milkweed
-
1 lb / 30 m²
sown in coconut fibre
3 lbs seed
Kv
Kosteletzkya virginica
Seashore Mallow
-
1 lb / 30 m²
sown in coconut fibre
3 lbs seed
Mr
Mimulus ringens
Monkey Flower
-
1 lb / 30 m²
sown in coconut fibre
CYPRESS + TUPELO SWAMP
5
BALLED AND BURLAPPED DETAIL
Ga
SLOPE PLANTING - WATER LOCUST
stake and wire support
QUANTITY
CODE
BOTANICAL NAME
COMMON NAME
SIZE
SPACING
NOTES
5
Ga
Gledistia aquatica
Water Locust
7’ -8’ x 3’ -4’ 2” cal.
6 feet O.C.
B + B
new top soil
14
Nb
Nyssa biflora
Swamp Tupelo
30 gal. 2” -2 1/2” cal.
6 feet O.C.
container grown
former grade
16
Td
Taxodium distichum
Bald Cypress
15 gal. 1 1/2” - 2” cal.
6 feet O.C.
container grown
root ball
25
Ca
Callicarpa americana
American Beauty Bush
5 gal. 2 feet
3 feet O.C.
container grown
27
Ll
Lyonia lucida
Fetterbush
5 gal. 2 feet
3 feet O.C.
container grown
30
Mc
Morella cerifera
Wax Myrtle
5 gal. 2 feet
1 lb / 30 m²
container grown
2 lbs seed
Ig
Iris giganticaerulea
Giant Blue Iris
-
1 lb / 30 m²
hydroseeding
2 lbs seed
Ll
Leersia lenticularis
Catchfly Cutgrass
-
1 lb / 30 m²
hydroseeding
2 lbs seed
Pc
Pluchea camphorata
Marsh Fleabane
-
1 lb / 30 m²
hydroseeding
exisiting soil
SCALE 1:50 0
150
350cm
BOTTOMLAND FOREST QUANTITY
CODE
BOTANICAL NAME
COMMON NAME
SIZE
SPACING
NOTES
13
Cl
Celtis laevigata
Hackberry
15 gal. 1 1/2” -2” cal.
6 feet O.C.
container grown
9
Fp
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Green Ash
15 gal. 1 1/2” -2” cal.
6 feet O.C.
container grown
7
Ls
Liquidambar styraciflua
Sweetgum
30 gal. 2” -2 1/2” cal.
6 feet O.C.
container grown
74
Ll
Ligustrum lucidum
Glossy Privet
5 gal. 2 feet
3 feet O.C.
container grown
11
Qh
Quercus hemisphearica
Laurel Oak
30 gal. 2” -2 1/2” cal.
6 feet O.C.
container grown
34
Sr
Serenoa repens
Saw Palmetto
10 gal. 3 feet
3 feet O.C.
container grown
3 lbs seed
Co
Cephalanthus occidentalis Buttonbush
-
1 lb / 30 m²
hydroseeding
2 lbs seed
Ps
Panicum strigosum
Rough hair Witchgrass
-
1 lb / 30 m²
hydroseeding
2 lbs seed
Pf
Paspalum fluitans
Horsetail Paspalum
-
1 lb / 30 m²
hydroseeding
LIVE OAK + PALMETTO FOREST
BRUSH FASCINE DETAIL
5 Se
RIPARIAN PLANTING - SANDBAR WILLOW
live willow bundles
live willow stake
QUANTITY
CODE
BOTANICAL NAME
COMMON NAME
SIZE
SPACING
NOTES
12
Pt
Pinus taeda
Loblolly Pine
15 gal. 1 1/2” -2” cal.
6 feet O.C.
container grown
10
Qv
Quercus virginiana
Live Oak
45 gal. 3 1/4” cal.
6 feet O.C.
17
Sm
Sabal minor
Dwarf Palmetto
10 gal. 3 feet
3 feet O.C.
container grown container grown
5 lbs seed
Gv
Galium verum
Bed Straw
-
1 lb / 30 m²
hydroseeding
5 lbs seed
Pv
Panicum virgatum
Switchgrass
-
1 lb / 30 m²
hydroseeding
3 lbs seed
Rh
Rudbeckia hirta
Black-eyed Susan
-
1 lb / 30 m²
hydroseeding
3 lbs seed
Sp
Spartina patens
Wire Grass
-
1 lb / 30 m²
hydroseeding
dead stout stake
SCALE 1:50 0
150
350cm
High Park is unlike any other habitat in the City of Toronto. Its 400 acres contain the most significant areas of original prairie and oak savannah communities in the Toronto region. Today only 1% of these original pre-settlement communities remain in all of Ontario, and therefore High Park is designated an Area of Natural and Scientific Interest. Due to its size and proximity to the Lake Ontario waterfront, High Park not only contains and attracts a diverse range of flora and fauna, it is also considered a destination park for the 1 million human visitors it recevies each year.
pop: 8,155
pop: 8,005
STOCK ISLAND pop: 6,923
15%
pop: 3,811
20%
MIDTOWN
BOCA CHICA KEY
PROJECTED SEA LEVEL RISE 1 FOOT SEA LEVEL RISE (2040) 2 FOOT SEA LEVEL RISE (2070) 3 FOOT SEA LEVEL RISE (2100)
PERCENTAGE OF LAND COVER FLOODED 100%
70.2%
75%
50%
25%
SITE
2.5%
SEA LEVEL RISE
barren
7.3% water
7.5%
12.5%
scrub/grass wetlands
developed
5%
NEW TOWN
25%
pop: 8,511
70%
OLDTOWN
1
EXISTING CONDITION
LAND USE SHUFFLE RESIDENTIAL TO CONVSERVATION
OLD TOWN OLDTOWN
MIDTOWN
NEW TOWN
MIDTOWN
STOCK ISLAND
NEW TOWN
STOCK ISLAND
BOCA CHICA KEY
BOCA CHICA KEY
recreation recreation
2
2’ SEA LEVEL RISE
3
MOBILE HOMES
4
EXPORT HOMES
5
IMPORT ECOLOGY
public institutions institutions
industrialindustrial commercial commercial
residential residential
vacant vacant lots
LAND USE INVENTORY LAND USE
ZONES UNDER THREAT FROM 2 AND 3 FOOT SEA LEVEL RISE
IMMEDIATE fixed mobile
commercial
TRANSITION
DECONSTRUCT RELOCATE
contaminated clean/stable
ATTENUATE RESTORE
habitat RETAIN
conservation educational
materials
institutional program
military
EXPORT
utilities
vacant lots
EVENTUAL vital function
EXPORT INFILL common function habitat TRANSPLANT
PLANNING MATRIX
resource generation logistics manufacturing recycling centre urban cores habitat fostering
6
program
public
residential
seagrass salt marsh mangrove surge barriers
ARMATURE
industrial
recreation
HABITAT elevation
SEA LEVEL THREAT
TEMPORARY USE food growing social services recreation disaster relief commodity storage
DECONSTRUCTION
7
LAND USE SHUFFLE
1
CENTRAL RECEIVEING PIERS
2
COMMUNITY MARINAS
3
DISTRIBUTION NETWORK
4
ECOLOGICAL LINKS
MODULAR FRAMEWORK The basis of the Armature structure
relys
on
a
modular
steel
framework. The framework is manufactured in Trumbo Point, Key West where it is packaged and delivered to the desired site. The structure is
expandable
and
vertically
both
horizontally
allowing
for
the
communities changing needs.
STANDARDIZED UNITS Once
the
framework
is
assembled
land use is inserted through the application of standardized units. Each unit is measured 5m x 15m and can accomodate any land use type. Units
can
be
consolidated
both
horizontally and vertically within the framework to serve the programmmatic function within.
THESIS
WINNIPEG, MANITOBA
WINTER 2014
SITES OF CONVEYANCE
In 2013, the Global Nature Fund designated Lake Winnipeg as the World’s most threatened lake of that year. Situated in the heart of North America, Lake Winnipeg reflects a growing issue across the continent, and the world - Eutrophication.
Eutrophic waters are evident of an ailing watershed; to develop a solution we must look upstream along the paths of conveyance. These waterways are conduits of excessive contamination from overburdened landscapes and urban centres.
This thesis proposes to utilize these waterways as infrastructures that heal instead of degrade ecosystems, while conveying a broader understanding of resource management and natural processes.
LEVEE TRANSFORMATION STRATEGIES
EXPAND
GRADE
SLICE
COMPRESS
TAP
FLOOD
RESTORE
CONVEY
RETAIN
CLEANSE
INFRASTRUCTURE PROCESS
LANDSCAPE COMPONENTS wind powered water pump cattail cleansing cells
excess water storage
nutrient rich water
rising floodwater
groundwater recharge
cattail biomass export
CATTAIL FARM
CATTAIL FARM
FLOOD CONDITION
TYPICAL CONDITION
AGRICULTURE
GROVE
Wheat Triticum aestivum Oats Avena sativa Soybeans Glycine max Corn Maize everta Canola Brassica napus Flax Linum usitatissimum
Bur Oak Quercus macrocarpa Trembling Aspen Populus trembuloides Red Osier Dogwood Cornus sericea Wild Black Currant Ribes americanum Little Bluestem Schizachyrium scoparium Switchgrass Panicum virgatum
DRY PRAIRIE Big Bluestem Andropogon gerardii Black Eyed Susan Rudbeckia hirta Canada Wild Rye Elymus canadensis Giant Hysop Agastache parvifolia Little Bluestem Schizachyrium scoparium Smooth Aster Symphyotrichum laeve
RIPARIAN TRANSECT AGRICULTURAL BUFFER
UPLAND FOREST
MOIST PRAIRIE
Basswood Tilia americana Bur Oak Quercus macrocarpa Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvatica Trembling Aspen Populus trembuloides White Spruce Picea glauca Wood’s Rose Rosa woodsii
Indigo Bush Psorothamnus fremonti Narrow Sunflower Helianthus angustifolius Swamp Milkweed Asclepias incarnata Wild Iris Iris pallida Yellow Primrose Oenothera biennis Yarrow Achillea millefolium
RIVERBOTTOM
DRY PRAIRIE
WETLAND
American Elm Ulmus americana Manitoba Maple Acer negundo Beaked Hazelnut Corylus cornuta Nannyberry Viburnum lentago Saskatoon Amelanchier alnifolia Chokecherry Prunus vigriniana River Birch Betula nigra Cottonwood Populus deltoides Highbush Cranberry Viburnum trilobum Tufted Hairgrass Deschampsia cespitosa Canada Brome Bromus purgans
Big Bluestem Andropogon gerardii Black Eyed Susan Rudbeckia hirta Canada Wild Rye Elymus canadensis Giant Hysop Agastache parvifolia Little Bluestem Schizachyrium scoparium
Water Plantain Alisma plantago Bur-reed Sparganium eurycarpum Awned Sedge Carex atheudes Toad Rush Juncus bufonius Summer-Cypress Kochia scoparia Pussy Willow Salix discolor Common Cattail Typha latifolia Arrow Grass Triglochin palustris Blue Grama Bouteloua gracillis Slough Grass Beckmannia syzigachne Canada Brome Bromus purgans Marsh Reedgrass Calamagrostis canadensis
WETLAND TRANSECT NATURAL RUNOFF FILTER
FLOATING WETLAND PODS: APRIL
PROCESSING TERMINAL: JULY
CATTAIL FARM: MAY
NETWORK FLOW St. Mary’s Road to Winnipeg public boat launch public parking
water monitoring wetland pod processing
private resouce distribution
wind powered pumps red river control structure habitat regeneration
riparian settlements
constructed wetlands
floodway control structure
communal greenhouses primary circulation
riparian restoration
cattail farms
floating wetland pods
agricultural fields cattail plots
rail to Duluth, MN
Seine St. Mary’s Road to Winnipeg
e River
HABITAT TRACT: SEPTEMBER
Trans Canada Highway #1 to BC
resource storage
wind powered water pumps
barge wharf
biomass processing
filtering wetlands
cattail farms
filtering wetlands
water monitoring
biofuel station
soccer fields cattail plots communal greenhouses
baseball diamonds
water retention cells
habitat regeneration
rail to Toronto, ON
Trans Canada Highway #1 to ON
DRAWING PACKAGE
S1
NORTH EDGE BOULEVARD
L-5
SMALL SCALE DESIGN
FAll 2013
+76.27
+76.27
+76.42
+76.42
680 mm 6800 mm
+76.46
3750 mm
+76.46
0
400
76.25
76.25
00
160
76.00
2500 mm
2000 mm
76.00
9000 mm
75.75
3000 mm
75.50 75.25
75.75
80 m² north terrace 03
tree planting
north rain garden
3000
L-5
75.50
6000 mm
75.00
75.25
2000 mm
74.75
74.50
04 L-5
350
74.25
75.00
750 mm
0
armourstone wall
9000 mm
m
00 m
105
stair detail
2500 mm
74.75
01 L-5
74.50
74.00
74.25 74.00
7500
40 000
73.75
73.75
5000
73.50
73.50 73.25
22000 mm
The objective of this assignment was to design an accessway upon a speculative waterfront site while all
run-off
on
site.
The
design
was
73.00
12000
to
comprise of two seating terraces, a continuous ramp of
13000
managing
73.25
4000 mm
5000
90 m² south terrace
73.00
south rain garden 7000 mm 72.75
no more than 8 percent slope, landings, and planted
2500 mm
72.75
02
rain garden
L-5
areas.
00
130
72.50
0
400
2000 mm 72.50
The deliverables were to include a labeled drawing
6000 3000
72.25
5000
+72.08
+72.08
6000
accomodate the drawing package.
WATERFRONT PROMENADE
S1
model roughly 8.5”x11” of the proposed design was to
72.25
15000
plan and associated details. Additionally, a lazer-cut
+71.28
L-5
package of the design layout, grading plan, planting
+71.28
layout plan 1:150
0
1.5
6
10m
NORTH EDGE BOULEVARD
+76.27
+76.27
+76.42
+76.42
+76.46
+76.46 +76.46
76.46+
76.25 76.25 76.2
+
TOW + +76.41
.50
e
7%
lop
5
.50
75.75
e
slop
+75.06
+76.35
75.50
+75.03
BOW 74.85
75.67+ 75.50
+75.65
7% slo
pe
74.75
TOW + +76.37
%
BOW
75.00
BOS
pe
slo
5 steps @ 25 cm
+75.19
74.75
0
75.0
10
+75.18
+76.25
75.22+
+75.20
74.25
76.25+
TOS
+76.40
74.50
75.25
TOW
75.23+
75.25
75.00
76.00
ss-s
75.55
.25
75
+75.69
75.25
BOW
75 75
75.7
75.50
e
slop
6%
cro
0
76.0
slo
7%
75.75
2%
pe
18% slope
75.57
5
76.00
74.7
6%
5
74.00
74.50
e
slop
74.25
74.53+
slope
74.52+
73.75
74.00
12%
+73.52
subgrade drainage pipe outlet +74.70
74.50
5% slope
73.75 73.50
73.50 73.25
74.25
74.00+
6% slope
73.00
72
73.25
73.50
73.75
73.25 73.20+
+
cro
ss-s lop e
.7
72
2%
72
72.95
5
0
.2
73.17+
5 0
8% slope
73.0
72.75
73.00
+73.22
pe
7% slo
.5
74.75 +
BOW
5 72.7
TOW
72.21 +
72.75 pe
6% slo
0 72.5
+72.47
7% slope
TOS
+73.75
72.50
73.81+
72.50
BOS
+72.33
72.30+
+ 73.75 72.25+
BOW
7 steps @ 25 cm
72.25
72.30+
1% slo
pe
72.25
TOW
72.25 72.19+
CB
subgrade drainage pipe outlet 72.16+
CB
+72.08
+72.16
72.16+
+72.08
72.08+
+72.08
WATERFRONT PROMENADE +71.28
+71.28
grading + drainage plan 1:150
0
1.5
6
10m
NORTH EDGE BOULEVARD
PLANT LIST ID TREES Bp
quantity
190
botanical name
betula papyrifera
common name
white birch
size
2.5” cal. B+B
+76.27
+76.27
+76.42
+76.42
+76.46
+76.46
76.25 76.25 76.00
PERENNIALS
76.00
Ac
130
asarum canadense
wild ginger
2 gal.
Ms
110
matteuccia struthiopteris
ostrich fern
2 gal.
Bp 3
75.75 Custome Meadow Mixture CMM
75.50
Custome Meadow Mixture CMM
Ac 50
50
75.50
north rain garden
75.00
CMM
CUSTOM MEADOW MIXTURE (Sow @ 22 kg/ha) Botanical Name Common Name Rudbeckia hirta Black Eyed Susan Andropogon gerardii
Big Bluestem
Asclepias syriaca Sorghastrum nutans Schizachyrium scoparium Panicum virgatum Monarda fistulosa
Common Milkweed Indian Grass Little Bluestem Switchgrass Wild Bergamot
% 9 9 15 30 20 15 2
75.75
Ms
75.25
75.25
75.00
74.75
74.50 sod
74.25
74.75 74.50
74.00
74.25 74.00
73.75
sod
73.75
SEEDING NOTES
73.50
1. LAYOUT OF PLANT MATERIAL TO BE EXECUTED BY THE CONTRACTOR AND APPROVED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSALLATION. 2. ALL PLANTS SHALL BE PLANTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPROPRIATE PLANTING DETAILS ON THE DRAWINGS AND WRITTEN SPECIFICATIONS.
73.50 73.25
3. ALL PLANTS ARE TO BE PLANTED IN APPROVED TOP SOIL FREE FROM WEEDS, SUBSOIL, ROOTS, STONES, LUMPS OF CLAY AND TOXIC MATERIAL. 4. PLANT SO THAT NURSERY SOIL LINE MATCHES FINISHED GRADE AFTER SETTLING.
73.25
73.00
5. GENTLY TRAMP SOIL WHEN BACKFILLING TO REMOVE AIR POCKETS. 6. BUILD SOIL SAUCER AROUND OUTER EDGE OF PLANTING HOLE. SAUCER SHALL BE SOAKED WITH WATER AND COVERED WITH MULCH.
Bp
73.00
3
7. REMOVE ALL NURSERY TAGS, METAL OR PLASTIC BINDINGS, AND VINE SUPPORTS.
Ac
south rain garden
80
72.75 Ms 60
72.75
SEEDING NOTES
72.50
1. SEED ANNUAL RYEGRASS AS A NURSE CROP FOR EROSION CONTROL AND TO SUPPRESS WEED GROWTH DURING THE FIRST SEASON. 2. SEED NURSE CROP MIX SOWING RATE TO BE 22-25 kg/ha or 250G PER SQ. M.
sod
72.50
3. SOWING SHOULD TAKE PLACE IN THE FALL, BETWEEN OCTOBER 15TH TO LATE NOVEMBER. 4. AREA SHOWN FOR SEEDING ARE APPROXIMATE. ACTUAL AREAS TO BE DETERMINED ON SITE IN CONSULTATION WITH LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT.
72.25
72.25
Custome Meadow Mixture CMM
Custome Meadow Mixture CMM
+72.08
+72.08
WATERFRONT PROMENADE +71.28
+71.28
planting plan 1:150
0
1.5
6
10m
150
C.I.P. CONCRETE
600
PRUNING - by 1/3 to remove damaged or objectionable branches following proper horticultural practice. DO NOT PRUNE LEADERS.
900 50x5 mm stainless steel flat
150 150
GUYING - 1 wo 51(2”)x51(2”)x6(1/4”) steel T-bars, minimum 2.438(8’-0”) long, and drilled to receive #10 wire threaded through 13(1/2”) rubber hose to support tree. Point “T” flat black.
100 FINISHED GRADE
1800
500
200
WRAPPING - Approved tree wrap from top of ball to 305(12”) above first branch. Secure with binder twine, wound opposite to wrapping. Secure top, middle and bottom.
TOPSOIL
TREE GUARD - for rodent protection, tree guard to be 150mm diameter PVC tubing.
COMPACTED GRANULAR ‘A’ TO 98% S.P.D.
CUT AND REMOVE - burlap from top 1/3 of ball.
COMPACTED SUBGRADE TO 98% S.P.D.
FERTILIZER - Two 21 gram Agriform tablets for each 25(1”) of trunk diameter.
300x50 timber joist 100x100 timber stud
400
300
1. STONES TO BE BUTTED TIGHTLY TOGETHER, LAID ON COMPACTED SUB GRADE TO 98% S.P.D. OR UNDISTURBED SUBGRADE. 2. TOP OF ARMOURSTONE MUST ALWAYS BE LEVEL TO THE TOP OF THE ADJACENT CONCRETE PLATFORM 3. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE IN MILLIMETRES UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED.
SAUCER - Build up earth saucer on downhill side. Earth saucer to be compacted. REMOVALS - All tree wraps are to be removed after the tree has been planted. All tree ties and stakes are to be removed one year after planting.
400
SCARIFY BOTTOM AND SIDES OF PIT
tree planting on slope detail
L-5
100
hot dip galv. structural bracket
FILTERCLOTH
GRADE - Maintain original grade of tree base after planting or slightly higher to suit site soil conditions.
0
150x50 timber bearer 200
NOTES:
150
03
timber facing
400
1000mm
275 01
04
stair detail
L-5
armourstone wall
L-5
0 0
40
120
400 cm
40
120
400 cm
KING STREET TORONTO, ONTARIO
FALL 2012
URBAN EDGE ANALYSIS The following urban design strategies are guidelines to ‘thicken’ the street edge of King Street West allowing for an enhanced street life. As of now the condition between private built form and public street life is rather stark and un-engaging.
Simple landscape design strategies can be implemented to soften urban transitions and negate unwelcoming exeriences. The areas between built form and the public sphere most heavily influences the creation of social activity and is optimal for design intervention.
The ‘thickening’ strategy is based on 4 areas of focus including pedestrian safety, ecology, permeability, and public life.
HISTORICAL SINGLE UNITS
15% BUILT FABRIC
DIVERSE ARRAY OF FACADE AND LANDSCAPE DETAILS. DENSITY OF ENTRANCES AND PORCHES FOSTER SOCIAL INTERACTION.
CONTEMPORARY ROWHOUSE
45%
BUILT FABRIC
MONOTONOUS FACADES AND LITTLE LANDSCAPE PERSONALIZATION. BLAND SEMI-PUBLIC LANDSCAPE DOES NOT ENGAGE WITH THE PUBLIC OR ALLOW NEIGHBOURLY INTERACTIONS.
MULTI-STOREY MIXED USE
40% BUILT FABRIC
LARGE-SCALE ARCHITECTURE DISREGARDS HUMAN SCALE. EXTREMELY LITTLE ENGAGEMENT WITH THE PUBLIC REALM.
SCREENING
DESIGN GUIDELINES
4 Blank facades facing the public realm install landscape buffers to soften hard edges.
KING STREET WEST
Landscape buffers reduce unsightly utilities and can also provide public seating and bicycle parking.
PROMOTE ECOLOGY
PUBLIC SEATING
1
5
Stormwater retention trenches create a landscape buffer between King Street and the public realm.
Public seating outside of businesses that do not need social spaces to operate.
Pedestrian movement separated between commuting (within the allee) and strolling (adjacent to shops) to allow differing speeds of public life.
EXISTING STREET CONDITIONS
Public seating animates exterior spaces and allows social and optional activities to occur.
RECLAIM PUBLIC REALM
ENABLE PUBLIC LIFE
‘THICKENING’ THE STREET EDGE
2
6
3 At intersections, building design creates niche spaces where public life can accumulate. These spaces suit such as public sculpture, paving and seating that sense of place.
features art and details, create a
TRANSIT ISLAND
2 5 1
Such spaces double as social nodes where people meet, are informed, or relax.
Public tranist mixed with artisitc seating and features liven street corners and attract customers.
CURB BULB-OUTS
3 Where applicable, transit islands protruding from curbs free the sidewalk of obstructions and provide safety.
Ideally, architecture along busy streets should articulate its facade toward pedestrian movement and gathering.
4
6
7
7 Curb bulb-outs at low volume street corners slow traffic and provide pedstrian safety. These bulb-outs can be pared with stormwater filtration areas and other aspects engaging public activity.
SECTIONAL ANALYSIS LONG POINT, ONTARIO
SPRING 2012
FIELD ECOLOGY COLLABORATION
SPECIES INVENTORY CANOPY
MIDSTORY
UNDERSTORY
Eastern Cottonwood
Populus deltoides
Red Osier Dogwood
Cornus sericea
Horsetail
Equisetum spp.
Balsam Poplar
Populus balsamifera
Prickly Wild Rose
Rosa acicularis
Marram Grass
Ammophila breveligulata
Wild Red Raspberry
Rubus idaeus
Beach Wormwood
Artemisia caudata
Common Yarrow
Achillea millefolium
American Dune Grass
Leymus mollis
SAND SHOAL FORMATION
PLANT COLONIZATION
AVIAN CORRIDOR
RECREATIONAL USE
wave action at a 30 degree angle gradually deposits sand and debris into a 40km long shoal, forming Long Point.
pioneer plant species adapted to sandy conditions, such as marram grass and little bluestem, begin to stabilize the dunes; a vast wetland beings to form on the leeward side of the shoal.
Long Point’s geographic situation and wetland network provides the ideal stopover conditions for migratory brids; the shoal becomes a significant migration corridor.
a seasonal tourism industry develops around Long Point’s beaches; sensitive ecologies are somewhat destablized due to heavy use, and the introduction of invasive species such as phragmites and dog strangling vice.
INTENSIVE MAINTENANCE Long Point is a shifting landscape; the future viability of constantly armouring the shore and transporting sand may pose a significant ecological threat.
SECTIONAL ANALYSIS TOMMY THOMPSON PARK, TORONTO
SPRING 2012
FIELD ECOLOGY COLLABORATION
SPECIES INVENTORY CANOPY
MIDSTORY
UNDERSTORY
European White Birch
Betula pendula
Red Osier Dogwood
Cornus sericea
Horsetail
Equisetum spp.
Manitoba Maple
Acer negundo
Yellow Twig Dogwood
Cornus sericea ‘Flaviramea’
Golden Rod
Solidago canadensis
Speckled Alder
Alnus rugosa
Common Reed
Phragmites australis
Cow Vetch
Vicia cracca
Big-Toothed Aspen
Populus grandidentata
Wild Amaranth
Amaranthus retroflexus
Paper Birch
Betula papyrifera
White Clover
Trifolium repens
SHORE INFILL
PIONEER ESTABLISHMENT
PRIMARY SUCCESSION
INCREASED BIODIVERSITY
construction debris is piled into Lake Ontario to create a breakwater in order to protect Toronto’s Inner Harbour
pioneer species travelling along wind vectors from Centre Island and Ashbridges Bay establish themselves on the spit’s marginal soil profile.
more species of flora and fauna begin to settle on the island; the debris and rubble begins to naturalize and attract avian species.
more complex species begin to inhabit the spit and increase local biodiversity; invasive species, such as carp, infiltrate the park.
HUMAN INTERVENTION the TRCA begins to intervene to protect the park from invasive species, as Toronto continues to urbanize, the fate of the park’s ecology will be tied to management practises that acknowledge its novel status.
RIPARIAN RESTORATION RESEARCH PROJECT
WINTER 2012
CONTEMPORARY PLANT TECHNOLOGIES Comparison Matrix
TREE ROOT WAD direction of river flow
rip rap
logs parallel to bank for stabilization
root wad
rip rap
Root wads are an excellent reuse of fallen trees within the restoration zone or from construction sites nearby. Although they require heavy machinery and labour most likely conducted by a contractor, they are the most successful in stablizing toes of riparian slopes. Installation of root wads is a relatively quick way to provide bank stability.
Over
time, sediment accumulates within the root fans and helps create bank structure to eroding slopes as well as provide aquatic habitat.
Ideal root wads should be at
least 10 feet long (with tree canopy removed) with optimal root fans of 5 to 6 feet in diameter. The roots are usually planted in a linear series of multiple trees in a manner that undulates with the natural curvature of the watercourse. By doing so this increases the chances of capturing higher amounts of sediment. Combining this simple technique with others such as vegetative matting and brush layering duals as a riparian
yes
vegetative tool as well.
no somewhat
FASCINES
live stakes
live fascine
vegetative matting
Fascines are bundles of dormant branches bound together to create a log-like structure that roots itself into the slope. The bundle is primarily used to revegetate although it has some stabilization characteristics. These linear structures that follow a slopes contour are commonly used as a transition between other riparian revegetative techniques like brush matting and live siltation. Another revegetative use is that the coarse structure captures wind blown seeds providing habitat for their growth. Bundles of dormant willow branches 3 to 4 feet long and 8 inches in diameter are easily created, requiring little skill and/or heavy equipment. Once a sizable amount of bundles have been constructed they are dug into trenches perpendicular to the slope and only burried approximately 3 to 4 inches into the ground. Fascine rows are secured by wooden stakes although these may be substituted for dormant willows or cottonwood speices. Multiple rows can be installed giving the slope a terraced quality.
root wad
TREE REVETMENT
BRUSH LAYERING
VEGETATED CRIBBING
native herbaceous planting dormant cuttings
dormant cuttings
tree revetments
grass roll
native herbaceous planting
live brush (vegetation included)
rip rap base
soil/gravel mixture
timber crib (untreated)
tree revetments
gravel base
This relatively cost effective technique is where downed trees are cabled to an eroding bank to help restore it to a vegetated environment and provide increased bank protection. The reinforced – typically spruce or other evergreen - brush traps sediment, slows water flow, provides immediate aquatic habitat, and creates a protected environment in which plant growth can be reestablished.
Cribbing as a form of revegation is usually reserved for conditions of increased erosion caused by high water velocities and/or flooding. The structural nature of this technique enables it to replace more passive strategies such as fascines or brush matting. Consequently, the installation is expensive, technically challenging, and requires heavy machinery.
Brush Layering is an appropriate system to use for revegetation of fill or a
The main function of tree revetments is to capture sediment and debris along outside stream-channel bends creating an environment conducive to revegetation. This technique can, but doesn’t always need, to be paired with revegetative strategies such as installing grass rolls - like what occured along the Kenai river - or inserting live cuttings into the revetments. Grass rolls are recommended where herbaceous plant material once thrived, usually along low velocity streams and lake shores. Their composition is made up of live sod wrapped in biodegradable fabric - usually coconut fibre - and twine. This technique is inexpensive and requires little training for fabrication and installation. The benefit is that the additional plant material takes hold within the debris as the tree revetment naturally degrades over time. The symbiotic relationship created ensures a successful outcome for riparian restoration.
Prior to installation the riparian area must be excavated and removed of any existing vegetation or large boulders. Non-treated timbers are then notched together to create a crib-like structure overtop of a large stone base along the banks. Cross-timbers may also be installed perpendicular to the bank for reinforcement. After construction, the structure is then back-filled with a soil-gravel mixture. The addition of gravel to the growing medium is essential for increased stability and less chance of erosion. Afterwards, live cuttings of fast-growing riparian vegetation are inserted into the growing medium. The vegetation is planted because as it grows the roots stabilize the banks and intertwine with the wooden crib.
compounded with ability to plant within the structure as well.
newly constructed slope.
It is typically used where water fluctuation is large
since it is required to gain access to the toe of the riparian slope for proper installation. The technique does not require as much heavy equipment as others but its complex layers and intricate construction provide great stability
Cuttings are layered on terraces perpendicular to the slope so that they will root into the bank or hillside. The live brush is then covered with soil so that only the growing tips protrude from the slope, helping to reduce the velocity and stress of flows against stream banks. An advantage of the system is that it allows the combination of the typical fast-rooting species like willow, cottonwood, and dogwood with site specific plant selections that may need a bit more protection and rearing to establish.
thank you. DAVID BURNS davidgjburns@gmail.com