PORTFOLIO DEBOLINA
RAY
AA EMTECH GRADUATE - 2019-21
CV DEBOLINA RAY
debolina.ray@aaschool.ac.uk +44 7471 66 9603 Current Location: London linkedin.com/in/debolina-ray-550722b8
SKILLS SOFTWARES: AUTOCAD ADOBE PHOTOSHOP ADOBE ILLUSTRATOR ADOBE INDESIGN RHINOCEROS GRASSHOPPER KARAMBA (STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS) KEYSHOT VRAY ARCHICAD REVIT SKETCHUP MICROSOFT OFFICE SUITE AUTODESK CFD LADYBUG (RADIATION ANALYSIS) PYTHON/ C SHARP (BEGINNER)
FABRICATION TECHNIQUES:LASERCUTTING 3D PRINTING ROBOTIC CLAY PRINTING METAL FABRICATION CNC ROUTING
SOFT SKILLS :GRAPHIC PRESENTATION SKILLS PHOTOGRAPHY WRITING SKILLS
EDUCATION
COMPETITIONS
2019 - 2021
Volume Zero; 'Re - School', 2018 Team of 3 2nd Runner Up!
Emtech (Emergent Technologies and Design) M.Arch graduate program Architectural Association, School of Architecture, London, WC1B 3ES
Archdais' - Sculpting The Pioneers; Tadao Ando, 2018 Team of 3 2nd Runner Up!
2011 - 2016 B.Arch (Bachelor in Architecture), M.M. College of Architecture, SavitriBai Phule Pune University, (previously known as University of Pune) Pune, Maharashtra, India. PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE
EXHIBITION
2016 - 2019
AA Emtech - Design And Build, 2019
April 2018 - May 2019 Junior Architect at STaND Design, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India. Part of design team: Concept initiation + design development + site supervising + vendor coordination + boq making + working drawings - for spatial design projects such as aparments, offices, kids therapy clinic, restaurant. Headed the volume Zero Re-school competion - 2019.
Worked in a team to model assembly layout of kerfed metal roof pergola to be assembled on Buro Happolds' office rooftop.
Feb 2017 - Mar 2018 Junior Architect at Interlink Invent, Pune, Maharashtra, India. Assisted Senior Architect with presentation drawings realated to architectural drawings of small to mid-scale projects in hospitatlity sector such as wellness spa resort, museum and bungalow projects. May 2015 - Oct 2015 Intern at Spaceform Architects, Pune, Maharashtra, India. Made sanction drawings for bungalow + 3 storey apartment building project.
AA Project Review, 2020 3 graduate program course projects displayed online.
LANGUAGE SKILLS ENGLISH Proficient speaker/ writer BENGALI Native speaker HINDI Proficient speaker
INTRODUCTION I am a recent M.Arch graduate from the Architectural Association, School of Architecture, London, in 'Emergent Technologies and Design', specialising in the advanced computational design and logic building paradigm. A keen believer of design that has a narrative around human interaction with its built space and sustainability through application of technology and scientific thinking. Worked in multi-disciplinary design studios in India; where I have had to engage in all aspects of design and scales starting from conceptualisation of a design, to presentation drawings, working drawings and handling boqs. I was also a part of the site supervision team, having to discuss the designs with the respective contractors to ensure proper execution. Acquired work ethics necessary to work in teams, to formulate designs developing out of material and structural system testing, form finding principles, iterative design and multiobjective optimisation processes, that takes inspiration from natural processes and phenomenons. Eager to explore these skillsets further and applicability at various scales within the urban and architectural design paradigm.
CONTENTS ACADEMIC PROJECTS
0 1 Stigmergic - Termite Pavillion 0 2 Intertidal Intervention 0 3 Emergence Seminar
PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE
0 4 Catalogue of Objects (Office Design) 0 5 Residential cum commercial complex
EXTRAS
- Volume Zero Competition (Re-school) - Presentation Drawings - Articulated surfaces - Digital Artwork
01
Conceptual sketch for human space guide
0 2 STIGMERGIC - TERMITE PAVILLION TYPE: Academic [Architectural Association] YEAR: 2020 TEAM: With Steven Zy BUILD TYPE: Pavillion Design, agent- based system application SOFTWARES: Rhino, Grasshopper, Python coding, FEA (karamba in gh), Robotic toolpath generation, robotic clay printing with Kuka The idea was to investigate the mathematical, geometric, material and hierarchical logics to develop a critical view on the relationships between systems design and performance based on stigmergic behaviour of termites that could lead to an experiential pavilion design within a box of 2m x 3m x 4m. We started by comprehending the system logic by breaking down into elements & studying the individual behaviour of the attractor points (as structural element generator) & repellor points (as space generators) which was proven after several tests. Further on, the form is rationionalised in terms of structural stability and material required for the global geometry using F.E.A. analysis, light penetrability and volume generation for material requirements. The
algorithm for the final form was re structured in order to generate a better outcome based on the observations derived from the previously done analysis.
Python in grasshopper code
Behaviour of stigmergic algorithm post introduction to Repulsion fields
Feasibility tests on parts to be tested by 3d printing, toolpath generation, and inner vs outer shell strength analysis
Design iteration top down
Design iteration bottom to top
Final iteration post FEA Analysis
In the end, all these tests and analysis informed the final strategy for the fabrication system which discarded the separate construction, assembly and jointing system. Instead, it focussed on hypothyising a continuous clay printing done with the help of a dynamic 3d printing technique, guided on a metal framed structure, starting from base to top.
Regardless, a global strategy for fabrication and assembly was hypothised prior to tests using clay and robotic 3d printing. 3d clay printing was done in parts to understand the feasibility of production using human interaction v.s full robotic automation. The relationship between the geometry and the structural stability/ strength of the clay (3d printed) module’s was analysed using karamba tests. In the end, all these tests and a nalys is informed the final strategy for the structuralstructural stability/strength of the clay (3d printed) module’s was analysed using karamba tests.
02
A. OPEN COAST MARSH
B. ESTUARINE BACKWATER BARRIER
C. OPEN EMBAYMENT MARSH
0 4 INTERTIDAL INTERVENTION TYPE: Academic [Architectural Association] YEAR: 2020 TEAM: With Maria Louisa Torres and Maximo Tettamanzi BUILT TYPE: Housing, Tower Cluster, IMTA Engineering solutions SOFTWARES: Rhino, Grasshopper, CFD- Autodesk flow design, FEA (karamba in gh), Wallacei (Multi-objective optimisation using genetic algorithm)
The aim of this work was to develop a cluster housing project in the Hoo Peninsula, which would be able to fit 50,000 people; responding to the challenges this intertidal area presents in adapting to climate change. Over the next century climate change will cause sea level rise, and an increase in the storm surge frequency, changing the current conditions of the peninsula. The design proposes a network system able to adapt to environmental changes and population growth, consisting of tower coastal defenses, tidal terracing, and clutch dikes that recreate proper conditions for Integrated Multi trophic aquaculture. Through research of the site, strategising of egineering solutions and genetic algorithm multi objective optimisation- key elements like tidal levels, predominant water directions, and fluid dynamics on site were understood in order to develop experiments that led to the proposed design.
G.A. FOR TRANSPORTATION NETWORK OPTIMISATION
INSTANCE DURING HIGH TIDE
15
people / floor 300 sqm
600
people / tower
3000
people / cluster
Ground Podium Area = 300 sqm + 50% of 300 (open space areas) = 450 sqm = 20 x 25 m
[1] [a + b]
[3 + 4] [a + b]
[2] [c] Body Part- A Ponds
Body Part- B Urban Hub
INSTANCE DURING RISING TIDE Body Part- C Residential Tower Cluster OYSTERS
Naturally growing sea weed/ sea grass
SEA CUCUMBER
Deck Area Around Pond
SEA GRASS
SEA GRASS
Ramp connecting podium and pond deck
MUSSELS ON THE COLUMN
Body Part- D Platforms
BODY PLAN FOR CONNECTIVITY OPTIMISATION
Podium of the tower building/ refugee level
Ponds cum sand beds with sea cucumbers
Future Railway station
Mussel posts
Floating Sea weed agriculture Pods
BEST AVERAGE SOLUTION ISOMETRIC VIEW - GEN 91 IND 14 INSTANCE DURING LOW TIDE
Clutch Dykes
Tidal Terraces
Sea weed lines
Mussel posts
IMTA ( INTEGRATED MULTI TROPHIC AQUACULTURE) [1] Primary Fed Agent that produce primary waste stream [a] Clutch Dikes - to achieve a system of ponds for Oyster cultivation [b] Tidal Terracing - Improve Water Quality and help in natural growth of marshes, while contributing to reduce water velocity. FLOOD MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES [c] Coastal Defence Towers - Reduce Water Velocity [2] Molluscs to consume suspended organic materials [3] Sea Weeds to assimilate dissolved nutrients [4] Deposit Feeders to ingest settleable solids
By selecting the best average ranked individual for all fitness criterion, we could observe that network connections as per shortest required pathways and linkage with the higher grounds, are equally distributed amongst all body parts.
CFD TESTS FOR BASE GEOMETRY OF TOWER
BODY PARTS OF THE TOWER
FEA ON EXTERNAL STRUCTURE ACTING AS COLUMNS AND BEAMS
G.A. SELECTION OF TOWERS
03
0 2 EMERGENCE SEMINAR TYPE: Academic [Architectural Association] YEAR: 2020 TEAM: With Felipe Oeyen BUILD TYPE: Urban Re-design and multi-objective optimisation of built scape as per criterion SOFTWARES: Rhino, Grasshopper, Ladybug for radiation analysis, Wallacei (Multiobjective optimisation using genetic algorithm) The following seminar project depicts the development and analysis of several genetic algorithm experiments running in Grasshopper for Rhino, using the multi-objective optimizing tool called Wallacei, as part of the Architectural Association Emtech Emergence Seminar. The aim of the experiments conducted was to generate genetic algorithms that could be applied to the optimization of towers, working with simple geometries at first and with a case study in the end. For the Sequence 2 of the seminar we worked with the digital construction of a case study tower, using Grasshopper for Rhino and Wallacei X, an Evolutionary Multi-Objective Optimization and Analytic Engine. For our case study we chose the Bank of America Tower designed by Cook + Fox Architects and situated in the city of New York. One of the particular aspects of this tower is its location in a very dense part of the island of Manhattan, opposite Bryant Park, with a subway station on one corner of the site and a historic theatre on the other corner. This tool is emerging to help design taking into consideration multiple objectives that affect the built space and the space surrounding it that could be utilised as a pre design development tool for space syntax selection.
The tower is built taking into consideration the new set of intervention added to the urban fabric such as introduction of pathways connecting buildings to the other 3 crucial centers around the Bryant park The tower is divided into body parts comprising mainly of floor plates, skin, terraces, lobby and auditorium. The parameters that are changeable are the skin edges, floor plate areas, core heights and lobby volume. All these are made changeable in accordance with the other changeable parameters such as network plates connecting the different towers and green spaces being generated in the process. A Genetic algorithm is run post the basic setup of the entire urban scape which are optimised w.r.t. different conflicting criterias. E.g. trying to maximise the north side tower plate area so that it gains maximum indirect sunlight but at the same time minimise the tower volume so that it can look slender. Such conflicting criterias when run together and separately for urban and tower fitnesses, we gain multiple phenotypes (modules) which can be further selected using post analysis methods such as radiation analysis using ladybug
SUBWAY STATION BRYANT PARK BANK OF AMERICA
Urban fitness objectives
Average Rankings Comparison
Pareto Front Results
Minimum shadow
Minimum bridge path length
Worst Average Ranking
Best Average Ranking
Gen 15 Ind 5
Gen 6 Ind 7
Gen 8 Ind 9
Gen 22 Ind 6
Machine Learning Hierarchical Clusters
Gen 99 Ind 1
Gen 99 Ind 4
Tower fitness objectives
Representative of cluster 1
Representative of cluster 5
Gen 62 Ind 5
Gen 95 Ind 9
Shadow on North Tower
Maximise Public space
In each experiment we applied different ways of evaluating the performance of the individuals throughout the process, by changing the number and types of fitness objectives applied. After that, we evaluated the results between the three simulations and tried to compare them by extracting 2 individuals out of each.
Machine Learning Hierarchical Cluster Representative of Cluster 4
Tower fitness objectives (without running them with urban fitnesses) Minimise shadow on north tower
Minimise terrace on tower
Pareto front results for only tower fitness Gen 99 Ind 8
Gen 99 Ind 7
The second selected individual standing for cluster 4 and emerging in generation 74, shows an evenly distributed graph for fitnesses 1(maximum slenderness), 2 (North tower floor area), 4 (South tower height), 5 (maximum terrace area), with a very bad performance for fitness objective 3 (Minimise shadow on north tower). Thus, we could find this representative fit to be taken forward for further architectural development for detailing. Yet, radiation analysis shows that it casts a much heavier shadow on the Bryant park next to it which may not be the best option.
Representative of Cluster 2 Average Rankings for towers only Worst Average Ranking
Best Average Ranking
The first individual, representative of cluster 2, emerges in generation 86 out of 100, this indicates it is a result of the evolutionary process. Its diamond chart shows us a pretty equally distributed graph for fitness 2 (North tower floor area), 3 (Minimise shadow on north tower) and 5 (maximum terrace area), with very bad performance in fitness 1 (maximum slenderness) and 4 (South tower height). Due to this we selected this for a radiation analysis and analysed that this representative let a lot more light penetrate on to the bryant park adjacent to it.
04
0 5 CATALOGUE OF OBJECTS TYPE: Professional, [STaND Design, Mumbai, India] YEAR: 2018 TEAM: Assisted lead architect (initiation to completion) BUILT TYPE: Office Design, Furniture Design SOFTWARES: Rhino, Sketchup, Keyshot, Autocad 2d, Photoshop. This office design was proposed for an american based company - Grace. It was based on the concept of 'Catalogue of objects', where each space was designed to feel a separate entity, giving equal emphasis on all areas in an open plan office space. The inspiration was taken from the company's policy of zero hierarchy and that each employee has a unique function and holds the same value as the rest. The space was designed to feel like objects kept in a museum space, which had its uniqueness and characteristics, yet served the purpose; making them all equally important.
Modelling on sketchup
5
4
Renders on Keyshot
Renders on sketchup + keyshot
Materials used: Plywood, M.S. Sections, Plate, pipes, cement sheet, foam, fabrics, wood veneer, laminates, fluted glass, toughened glass, Ips flooring, and water based paints. Technology: CNC cutting, laser cutting for wood and metal works, 3d Modelling on Rhino 5, render on keyshot 6. Role: Second incharge of the project, conceptualisation to presentation building, site supervising, making respective boq and good for construction drawings.
05
0 6 RESIDENTIAL COMPLEX TYPE: Professional [STaND Design, Mumbai, India] YEAR: 2018 TEAM: Assisted lead architect (presentation + wd) BUILT TYPE: Residential, Township Design, front end commercial.
SOFTWARES: Rhino, Sketchup, Keyshot, Autocad 2d, Photoshop.
This township proposal is for a residential community space, situated at Mira Road, which lies in the North western suburbs of Mumbai Metropolitan Region. The area is a preferred destination for potential low to mid income earning home buyers. The complex was desiged to have a central space that has landscape designed to cater to all age groups by creating individuality to every space separately. The areas were divided through the use of splines emerging from nodes at each entry point of respective apartment building. Materiality, texture and curve defined whether the spline was for a child, adult or senior citizen. Spaces got defined further according to the functions and activities that each age group enjoyed such as accupressure zone for the old, playful mounds for the children and forest space for comforting youthful couples.
FOREST SPACE
Senior Citizen Social
Texture Hard Mobility: Minimum
Adults Leisure
Texture: Hard and Soft Mobility: Medium
ACCUPRESSURE PARK
Children Playful
Texture: Varying Mobility: Maximum
Defining Users based on characteristics
Generating Circulation splines based on accessnodes SENIOR CITIZEN
ADULTS
CHILDREN
Assigning splines based on user characteristics SENIOR CITIZEN
ADULTS
CHILDREN
AMPHITHEATRE SPACE
Notes 1. 2. 3.
do not scale this drawing - follow only written dimensions notify architect in case of any discrepancy or if additional information is requiered all written material herein constitutes original and unpublished work and may not be duplicated, used or disclosed without the written consent of the architect
+0.85m
+0.85m
+1.05m
WING F WING G
+1.05m
B
C D
+1.05m
+0.0m
COMMERCIAL BUILDING
F
1. 2. 3.
do not scale this drawing - follow only written dimensions notify architect in case of any discrepancy or if additional information is requiered all written material herein constitutes original and unpublished work and may not be duplicated, used or disclosed without the written consent of the architect
+0.30m
+0.45m
TREE
TREE
TREE
TREE
TREE
+1.05m
+0.6m
+2.05m
15m m .05 +2
+1.
D' +1.05m
+1.45m
Amphitheatre
+1.8m
Walkway
C'
Accupressure Park
+1.05m
Walkway
+2.35m
+1.75m
+1.15m
+1.2m
B'
Forest Garden
+1.05m
+1.2m rethink triangular zone with cabana
+1.2m
TREE
Section AA'
WING H
E
Notes
TREE
TREE
TREE
+1.8m
TREE
RAMP 3 A
+1.15m
5m
TREE
+1.2m
TREE
.0
15m +1. 6m +1.
TREE
+1.2m
m
05 TREE +2.
TREE
+2 +1. .05 6m m +1. 15 m
15 +1.6 m m
+1.2m
TREE
+1.2m
+2
+1.
+1.2m +1.05m
F' RAMP 2
RAMP 1
CLUB HOUSE
+0.6m
E'
WING E
+0.85m
A'
WING D WING B
Forest
top soil @ 1.8m Walkway Raised Forest +1.85m Shaded crest walkway @ +1.45m
crest @ +2.65
N
top soil @ +1.15m
+1.25m
+1.25m
top soil @ 1.15m
+1.45m
+1.75m
+2.05m
WING A
Walkway
+3.25m
+2.35m
+0.6m top soil @ 1.4m top soil @ 1.7m top soil @ 2.0m top soil @ 2.3m
5
10
25
1.
50
SECTION AA
2. 3.
iris || j.k. developers || nts || for info only || 13-06-18
landscape plan || D023_001 || R1
ALL LEVELS INDICATE FFL.
crest @ +2.05m +1.25m
+1.1m
crest @ +2.05m +1.85m +1.25m
+1.25m
+1.25m
ALL LEVELS INDICATE FFL.
ALL LEVELS INDICATE FFL.
top soil @ 1.8m +1.1m
do not scale this drawing - follow only written dimensions notify architect in case of any discrepancy or if additional information is requiered all written material herein constitutes original and unpublished work and may not be duplicated, used or disclosed without the written consent of the architect
+1.095m
pebbles @ +1.15m +1.245m
crest @ +1.45m
SECTION BB
pebbles @ +1.15m +1.6m
slope top @ 1.4m +1.25m
top soil @ 1.65m +1.7m +1.1m
+1.1m
+2.4m
slope top @ 1.4m +1.25m
SECTION CC
+1.7m
+1.7m +1.1m
SECTION DD
ALL LEVELS INDICATE FFL.
crest @ +2.65
+1.1m
PUMP ROOM AND CABANA TO BE DESIGNED
top soil @ 1.65m +1.7m
+1.25m
+1.25m
SECTION EE
+1.1m
top soil @ 1.8m
+1.85m
top soil @ 1.15m
+1.25m
crest @ +2.65 top soil @ +1.15m
+1.1m
+0.6m
ALL LEVELS INDICATE FFL.
crest @ +1.45m
+1.2m
top soil @ 0.55m
+1.25m
top soil @ 1.15m
+1.45m
+1.75m
SECTION FF
+2.05m
+3.25m
+2.35m
+0.6m
top soil @ 1.4m top soil @ 1.7m top soil @ 2.0m top soil @ 2.3m
-0.6m
SECTION AA
ALL
ur, Mumbai - 400071, India || info@standdesign.in || (+91)9920035691, (+91)9920475565
ALL LEVELS INDICATE FFL.
STaND
Notes
0
architecture+design
-0.6m
Siddhant Tikkoo and Nikita D'Silva || 478 Pierreville, 13th road, Chembur, Mumbai - 400071, India || info@standdesign.in || (+91)9920035691, (+91)9920475565
WING C
Section BB'
ALL LEVELS INDICATE FFL.
3
9
1
6
9
3
1
1. 2. 3.
+22.2m
+22.2m 0.70
0.70
+22.2m
0.30 4.20
2.10
OVER HEAD TANK 5.32m x 3.05m x 1.7m
4.20
1.70
0.30
3.05
2.10
3.20 2.10
3.20
+20.1m
500mm cantilever from beam line
500mm cantilever from beam line
terrace lvl ffl @ +18.0m
0.30
AHU LOFT
secondary beam to be offset from window line
1550mm FB cantilever from beam line
1.95
0.70
terrace lvl ffl @ +18.0m
0.70
+18.0m
0.30
4.20
2.45
2.55
3.50
3.50
4.20
secondary beam to be offset from window line
1550mm FB cantilever from beam line +16.05m
500mm cantilever from beam line
500mm cantilever from beam line
0.30 secondary beam to be offset from window line
1550mm FB cantilever from beam line
AHU LOFT
0.70
0.30
1.75
0.70
+13.6m
third lvl ffl @ +13.8m
1.50
1.50
AHU LOFT
secon lvl ffl @ +9.6m
1.75
0.70
+9.4m
0.70
secon lvl ffl @ +9.6m
lift shaft
2.45
2.40
3.50
3.50
21.00
+11.85m
4.20
secondary beam to be offset from window line
1550mm FB cantilever from beam line
4.20
third lvl ffl @ +13.8m
21.00
do not scale this drawing - fol written dimensions notify architect in case discrepancy or if additional infor requiered all written material herein co original and unpublished work and be duplicated, used or disclosed the written consent of the archite
2.40
4.20
1.05
2.45
4.20
+7.65m
first lvl ffl @ +5.4m
secondary beam to be offset from window line
AHU LOFT
300mm cantilever from beam line
6.20
0.30
first lvl ffl @ +5.4m
1.75
300mm cantilever from beam line
0.30
2.45
2.40
4.20
+3.45m
4.20 ground lvl ffl @ +1.2m
basment ffl @ -1.8m
revision 1: 1. revision of slab-beam section detail on level 3 and terrace floor 2. revision of service duct width
3.00
ground lvl ffl @ +1.2m
2.40
2.80
3.00
+1.0m
basment ffl @ -1.8m
basment ffl @ -1.8m
-3.0m
section dd
section cc
section c & d || TD_G023_302 || R1
irisA commercial plaza || j.k. developers ||E a3 - nts || for info.F only || 03-10-18 B C D
1. 2. 3.
1.45
4.08
1.46
4.07
do wri not disc req all orig be the
D
0.15
C
PROJECTION ABOVE
11.55
1 1.25
SERVICE DUCT 26r @ 161.5mm
LIFT 1.45m x 1.4m
2 TOILET 2.4m x 1.2m
-0.3m
up
TOILET 1.4m x 1.2m
A SERVICE ENTRY
+1.2m
20r @ 150mm SUNK
PASSAGE 2.7m x 1.05m
4.24
10.65
0.10
3 4
STORE ROOM 1.5m x 1.35m
A down
1.95
PROJECTION ABOVE
B
B HALL 10.9m x 6.7m
+1.2m
beam line
1.01
6
VOID CUT-OUT ABOVE
7
1.60
beam line
MAIN ENTRY
C
9
0.15
8
revision 1: 1. revision in orientation and size of column D9 2. revision in position and size of column A6 3. revision of service duct width
ground floor plan || TD_G023_101 || R1
D
6.20
+5.2m
ground floor plan iris commercial plaza || j.k. developers || a3 - nts || for info. only ||
SECTION AA & BB || B023_506_R0||
6'-3" 3'-6" DETAIL A lustre paint finish l144 love song asian paints
BRASS FEATURE LIGHTING
7'-4"
3" SKIRTING IN MICRO-CONCRETE
3"
1'-10"
7'-2"
WOODEN TEAK LOUVERS MIRROR WITH BRASS LIPPING
SECTION AA
6'-2" DETAIL B ART WORK
lustre paint finish l144 love song asian paints
1" THK 9" WIDE WOODEN FRAME IN TEAK
EQ
BRASS FINISH STANDING LIGHT
7'-3"
EQ
3" SKIRTING IN MICRO-CONCRETE
EQ
8"
EQ
1"
1 " 4
1 " 4
1"
3"
1 " 4
DETAIL A
teak wood patti
brass patti
9"
1 " 4
3 " 4
PAINTED WALL 1 4" GROOVE IN TEAK WOOD FRAME
WALL
TEAK WOOD FRAME
9" X 1" TEAK WOOD FRAME
1" 3 " 4
DETAIL B
1 " 4
FRAME DETAIL FOR B 2.
1.
3.
do not scale this drawing - follow written dimensions notify architect in case of discrepancy or if additional informat requiered all written material herein consti original and unpublished work and ma be duplicated, used or disclosed wi the written consent of the architect
iris - 1 bhk || d & k developers || nts || for execution || 11.05.2018
SECTION BB
SECTION CC || B023_505_R0||
EQ
EQ
1" THK GYPSUM BOARD FALSE CEILING
EQ
marble clad
1" THK 9" WIDE WOODEN FRAME IN TEAK DETAIL A 1 21 " THK MARBLE SLAB WITH EDGE DETAIL
10'-2"
2'-10"
1" THK STONE SUPPORT (TRY TO USE EXISTING) existing white tiles 2" PLINT/SKIRTING FOR UNDER-COUNTER SHELVING
SECTION CC - CIVIL
DETAIL B
1 2"
BRASS ROD SUPPORT
1'-1"
2'
1'-1"
3'
1" THK SHELF IN PLYWOOD AND LAMINATE
marble clad
6" 4"
COUNTER LEG IN WHOLE WOOD
111 2"
EQ
DRAWERS FINISHED IN LAMINATE WITH TOP HANDLE DETAIL C
9"
6'-10"
EQ
EQ
CABINETS FINISHED IN LAMINATE WITH TOP HANDLE DETAIL
EQ
Notes 1.
e
024_510_R0
d
024_510_R0
c
024_510_R0
b
024_510_R0
SECTION CC - CARPENTRY
024_510_R0
a
024_510_R0
2. 3.
f
do not scale this drawing - follow only written dimensions notify architect in case of any discrepancy or if additional information is requiered all written material herein constitutes original and unpublished work and may not be duplicated, used or disclosed without the written consent of the architect
iris - 1 bhk || d & k developers || nts || for execution || 11.05.2018
g
g
024_510_R0
STORAGE ABOVE
1 " 2
1 " R4
h
1"
h
STORAGE ABOVE
d
e
f
1BHK_FURNITURE PLAN || B023_502_R0||
b
architecture+design
a
iris - 1 bhk || d & k developers || nts || for execution || 11.05.2018
Siddhant Tikkoo and Nikita D'Silva || 478 Pierreville, 13th road, Chembur, Mumbai - 400071, India || info@standdesign.in || (+91)9920035691, (+91)9920475565
DRAWER HANDLE SECTION (DETAIL C)
2.
Notes
architecture+design
Siddhant Tikkoo and Nikita D'Silva || 478 Pierreville, 13th road, Chembur, Mumbai - 400071, India || info@standdesign.in || (+91)9920035691, (+91)9920475565
DETAIL C
c
1.
STaND
brass base plate 1 2" brass rod support
drawer facia drawer base
do not scale this drawing - follow only written dimensions notify architect in case of any discrepancy or if additional information is requiered all written material herein constitutes original and unpublished work and may not be duplicated, used or disclosed without the written consent of the architect
DETAIL B
screw shelf line
3 4" 1 2"
024_510_R0
3.
1 " 2 3"
1"
1 " 2
1"
laminate finish drawer
3 3 4" x 1 4" wooden section handle
STaND
DETAIL A
3 " 4
i
handle detail
13 4"
i
1"
3 " 4
024_510_R0
marble counter
EXTRAS
a - Volume Zero's 'Re - School' competition b - Render from undergrad thesis - 'Gurukul' - International school design in Lavasa, India c - Graphics/ Presentation of elevations and plan of a restaurant design for Kohler competition entry 2018 d - Bootcamp (part of emtech course) e - Design and Technology (part of emtech course) f - Digital artwork for Cadavre Excuis 2020 2.0, by Tinge_of_Frame
a5 0
RE-SCHOOL COMPETITION TYPE: Competition [Volume Zero's 'Re-school' project] YEAR: 2018 TEAM: With Siddhant Tikkoo and Nikita D'Silva BUILT TYPE: School Design, Re-invented Community space SCHOOL
Entry points to the valley
Nagpur
INDIA
Aurangabad
Vantage 1
Etapalli Tehsil
Nashik
Madhya Pradesh
Mumbai
Approach
BREAKING THE MASS
Gadchiroli District Etapalli Tehsil
Telangana
Vantage 2
Entry Points to the valley
Major Cities
Bhamragarh Tehsil Approach Wind Direction
Primary Schools in Etapalli
VALLEY WITH A RIVER FLOWING AT THE CENTER
Puskoti 2Kms 50 hamlets
REKABHATAL 2Kms 50 hamlets
BACKGROUND STUDY
COMMUNITY
Pune
Chattisgarh Maharashtra
REKHABHATAL
PUSKOTI
Deopali 0.5 Kms 70 Hamlets
I N C O R P O R AT I N G GREEN SPACES
DEOPALI Settlements
Site Selected
SITE ANALYSIS
L AY E R I N G W I T H SCREENS AND ENCLOSURES
The vision of the school a space that unites native skill sets that are dying, integrated with learning. The school was looked at as a key feature of the community which integrated all aspects of the tribe's culture and traditions such as a space for holding dance and music festivities and gathering spaces for small businesses related to weaving and pottery. On the other hand it also integrated spaces like tunnel coves and labs for children to combine learning of ancient and new such as their cultivation practices and bamboo cutting techniques within an informal environment alongside the modern learning practices.
The life they are living at present
Rainwater drains onto the library walls washing the Gond art, creating a new canvas each year. VIEW A
View A
TUNNEL (play) WORKSHOP 55 SQM View C CLASSROOM 100 SQM LIBRARY 55 SQM TOILET 35 SQM ADMIN/STORE 30 SQM
ARTS AND CRAFTS 50 SQM
VIEW B View B
0 The life they deserve VIEW C
12
3
5 10
b
TYPE: Academic [University of Pune] YEAR: 2016 TEAM: Individual BUILT TYPE: School Design, Sustainable architecture, local material utility.
Graduate thesis: 'Gurukul' -International School Design in Lavasa India
Modelling on Sketchup Render on photoshop
c
Stepped seating elevation
Open kitchen where diners can view the performance of the kitchen
Open kitchen elevation
North Elevation
Plan TYPE: Professional [STaND Design, Mumbai, India] YEAR: 2018 TEAM: Individual BUILT TYPE: Restaurant Design, joinery design in metal and plywood
d
Fabrication assembly diagram
DESIGN AND TECHNOLOGY TYPE: Academic [Architectural Association] YEAR: 2020 TEAM: With Paravee Pokavathananurak BUILT TYPE: Fabrication techniques, Material behaviour, structural properties, FEA.
The aim of this work was to get an understanding of prototyping and form - finding methods with respect to the material and type of surface assigned. Our case was polypropylene as the material and revolution surface as our surface type. Multiple iterations of module prototypes gave us a feedback on the isotrophic qualities and structural stiffness with relation to geometry and folding techniques used. FEA further gave a feedback digitally the bending and deformation to be considered in real model vs the ideal model.
e
BOOTCAMP TYPE: Academic [Architectural Association] YEAR: 2019 TEAM: With Devaiah Ponnimada BUILT TYPE: Artifact, Curvature Analysis through tests, Structural strength of double layering, kerfing techniques. The aim of this work was to work with articulated surface. Articulated surfaces can be defined as a surface comprising of a number of elements joined together. The articulated surface may or may or may not have a seamless joinery system. We researched on layering of materials to achieve an articulated surface as seen in skin cells/ corn structure. We began by generating our shape from a gridded structure, then extracting hexagons, further joining the circles along the vertices to achieve our triangular prototype. Manual test on veneer(our final material assigned) was done using bending and kerfing techniques that can help keep its structural integrity, at the same time twist/ curve at certain angles. Final global geometry emerged as a dodecahedron with voids (as reconstructed below).
Dodecahedron as base geometry Faces extracted as edges, each edge divided into 3 parts and joined to form hexagon This task is done on all faces A sphere is drawn in the interior of the dodecahedron to cut through the hexagons on each face The final outer skin turns out to be hexagonal faces with circular voids with 2 different diameters. The final outer skin is combined with the inner spherical skin that acts as a tensioning layer which is further tested through material bending capabilities of wood veneer.
ARTWORK FOR CADAVRE EXCUIS 2020 2.0 ORGANISED BY TINGE_OF_ FRAME
THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME! debolina.ray@aaschool.ac.uk +44 7471669603 41 Fitzroy square, Bloomsbury, London