Thomas%20maes ospar

www.ospar.org

Latest Marine Litter developments in the OSPAR RSC

Thomas Maes Mediterranean Conference, Athens, 12-13 May 2014

Pre-History •

In the early 1990s, Sweden expressed serious concerns about the increasing amounts of solid waste (marine litter) found in the coastal and marine environment, and presented a background document on marine litter in the OSPAR Maritime Area to the OSPAR Assessment and Monitoring Working Group (ASMO).

•

In 1995, the OSPAR IMPACT Working Group adopted a Working Strategy on Marine Litter.

Sweden agreed to be Lead Party for the work. The OSPAR ASMO decided in 1999 on a pilot project. This decision was based on additional overview documents, and the work and recommendations of a Correspondence Group. The pilot project mandate was to develop a common methodology for the monitoring of beach litter, and to elaborate a draft monitoring programme for marine litter based on beach surveys.

•

Marine litter was included as one issue in the OSPAR Quality Status Report 2000 (QSR).

“There seems to have been no subsequent improvement in the situation with regard to litter.“ It was, furthermore, concluded in the OSPAR QSR that "improved and more standardized methodologies, including the establishment of reference areas, will be needed to properly assess the scale and impact of litter both on coasts and offshore. These in turn will provide a basis for assessing trends in the quantities and significance of litter throughout the OSPAR area".

•

ICG Marine Litter (co leads Germany/Netherlands) – since 2008

www.ospar.org

OSPAR Pilot Project on Monitoring Marine Beach Litter •

A total of 614 beach surveys on 51 reference beaches in 8 countries during the pilot project period, 2001–2006. The total number of marine litter items found per stretch of beach varied considerably among pilot project reference beaches and surveys. On average, 542 items of marine litter of varying size were found per 100-metre survey on the reference beaches throughout the OSPAR region.

•

Small plastic/polystyrene pieces (28%), pieces of ropes, cords and nets (14%)

•

The reliability of data strongly depends on the quality of the surveys

•

Number of items fluctuates heavily from year to year and from period to period

•

Challenges:

•

–

not due to lack of awareness of the issues surrounding marine litter or lack of data from various regions

–

the lack of standardisation and compatibility between methods used and results obtained made it difficult to compare data from different regions and to make an overall assessment of the marine litter pollution situation for the entire OSPAR region.

–

Non normal distribution of marine litter data!

Solutions: –

Standardisation of beach monitoring and data reporting (guidelines, photo book, ...)

–

Intercorrespondence Group on Marine Litter

–

Ongoing assessments, 3 different statistical methods proposed, continuous improvements

www.ospar.org

History • 2010 • 2013

• 2014

www.ospar.org

2010 • Quality Status Report • Ministerial Declaration (Bergen, Norway): “we note that quantities of litter of marine litter in many areas of the North East Atlantic are unacceptable and therefore we will continue to develop reduction measures and targets taking into consideration an ambitious target resulting in a reduction in 2020” • North East Atlantic Strategy (2010 – 2020): “to substantially reduce marine litter in the OSPAR maritime area to levels where properties and quantities do not cause harm to marine environment”

• Start of coordination of actions to deliver Good Environmental Status (for EU MS) and implementation of NEA Strategy

www.ospar.org

2013 • Agreement to develop Regional Action Plan Marine Litter at Commission Meeting • Agreement on Common and Candidate Indicators to be used by as many Contracting Parties (and EU MS in their MSFD Monitoring plans) as possible (no obligation) • Candidates: potential to become Common Indicator within few years (before next MSFD cycle)

• Prioritized Candidates: potential to become Common Indicator within 1-2 years

www.ospar.org

2013 continued • Common Indicators: – Beach litter (all CP’s)

– Plastic Particles in Stomachs Fulmars (North Sea) Floating indicator (and impact on biota) • Prioritized Candidate Indicator: seabed litter using International Bottom Trawl Surveys (IBTS) • Candidate: other target species/impact on biota indicators (outside North Sea) - in development • Candidate: microplastics (currently not defined, R&D will continue to close knowledge gaps) www.ospar.org

2014 Regional Action Plan Marine Litter • OSPAR Breakout Group at Berlin 2013 ML Conference • Agreement at OSPAR Cie 2013 to develop RAP ML Follow up through questionnaire and workshops: – Hamburg, Germany: November 2013 – The Hague, Netherlands: February 2014 • First policy Discussion at EIHA Committee meeting, Gothenburg, Sweden, April 2014

• Final Drafting Group 15-16 May, Bonn • Adoption at OSPAR Commission Meeting June 2014 www.ospar.org

2014 RAP ML Cont.

• Three levels of measures – Regional: large scale, wide spread and transboundary  OSPAR measure – National: information exchange and coordination of measures by OSPAR

– Measures in the competence of the EU or other international bodies (such as IMO): OSPAR develops joint proposal and agreements for concerted action • (Proposals for) operational targets www.ospar.org

2014 cont.

• Sea-based measures: Further harmonization of feesystems PWRF, stricter enforcement, best practice for fishing industry, …

• Land-based measures: Improved waste management, reduction of sewage-related waste, smarter production (eco design; packaging guidelines), zero pellet loss, …

• Removal measures: increased and more effective F4L • Education and outreach

www.ospar.org

Focus on operational targets • Linked to measures, do the measures work?

• Drafting group will consider:

– Implementation targets related to measures – Targets for development of measures

www.ospar.org

Coming months • Further coordination/integration on monitoring • IBTS indicator “promotion” to Common Indicator level

• Further work on RAP • Drafting Group15/16 May (further work on measures) • Adoption of RAP at OSPAR Cie (June)!

www.ospar.org