Christopher Caldwell on a Failure of Direct Democracy by James DeLong

Christopher Caldwell on a Failure of Direct Democracy

7/26/09 3:18 PM

Grasping Reality with Both Hands The Semi-Daily Journal of Economist Brad DeLong: A Fair, Balanced, Reality-Based, and More than Two-Handed Look at the World J. Bradford DeLong, Department of Economics, U.C. Berkeley #3880, Berkeley, CA 94720-3880; 925 708 0467; delong@econ.berkeley.edu.

Economics Homework Help Micro / Macro Economics Homework Help by Economics Professors

MoneyMorning.com/economic_recovery

www.ASAPTutor.com

Weblog Home Page Weblog Archives Econ 115: 20th Century Economic History Econ 211: Economic History Seminar Economics Should-Reads Political Economy Should-Reads Politics and Elections Should-Reads Hot on Google Blogsearch Hot on Google Brad DeLong's Egregious Moderation July 24, 2009

Christopher Caldwell on a Failure of Direct Democracy This is his take on what has gone wrong with California's government: California’s fiscal charade: California’s problems are those of “direct democracy”.... In voting on “propositions”, which sometimes touch on detailed budgetary matters, citizens of the Golden State have stood up consistently for two principles: the state should provide vastly more services to its citizens, and citizens should pay vastly less to the state. In 1978, Proposition 13 halved government’s take from property taxes; a decade later, Proposition 98 required the state to http://delong.typepad.com/sdj/2009/07/christopher-caldwell-on-a-failure-of-direct-democracy.html

Page 1 of 5

Christopher Caldwell on a Failure of Direct Democracy

7/26/09 3:18 PM

1978, Proposition 13 halved government’s take from property taxes; a decade later, Proposition 98 required the state to spend 40 per cent of its “general fund” on schools. Adding to the problem is the requirement of supermajorities for raising taxes. The present impasse reflects a problem of long standing, even if its severity is unprecedented. Ronald Reagan won the state’s governorship in 1966 by promising to do something about the budget deficit, which had by then risen to a calamitous $194m. Today, the state not only has a $26.3bn (£16bn, €19bn) budget gap but is constrained by all sorts of powerful institutions and laws from closing it.... [M]uch of the budget plan hammered out on Monday consists of accounting tricks. Unable to go to the banks to borrow, the state is borrowing billions from local counties and communities by simply not disbursing the money it is supposed to. If cities really want their programmes funded, they can try the credit markets themselves. A payday that was supposed to come next June has been pushed back into July, so that it will fall in the following fiscal year. Another trick is the accelerated withholding of state income tax. Instead of deducting 25 per cent of taxes per quarter, the state will deduct 70 per cent in the first six months of 2010, so that 20 per cent of revenues from the next fiscal year will be brought forward into this one. This is not a solution. This is changing your phone number so you can get some rest from the bill collectors who are dunning you.... It is an enduring mystery why US pundits should see a difference between the philosophy of Democrats (who stand for spending more than you raise) and the Republicans (who stand for raising less than you spend). Typical was a Chronicle editorial blasting Republicans for their insistence that the budget crisis be resolved in a way that did not involve tax hikes.... A stronger case can be made that tax revenues are too unpredictable. Here Proposition 13 is blamed for moving the burden from property to income taxes, which are more sensitive to economic fluctuations. In a boom economy, there is plenty of money to pay for the unemployment benefits that no one needs. When you have 12 per cent unemployment, as California does now, the state is too strapped to do anything. This accusation is true enough.... California’s fiscal difficulties are like a lot of things in life. Everyone warns you that there are certain hard and fast rules – like not confusing wishes with entitlements – that you break at your peril. You begin to break them and what happens? Nothing! Nothing at all, and for the longest time. You are like a ship that has lost its anchor. You can drift very pleasantly, day after day, believing you do not need an anchor at all, before one day you realise, quite suddenly, that you do. There are three things wrong with Caldwell's piece: His denunciation of the media for seeing a difference between California's Democrats--who want to solve the fiscal crisis by a combination of spending cuts, tax hikes, and accounting gimmicks--and California's Republicans--who want to solve the fiscal crisis by a combination of spending cuts and accounting gimmicks. A pointless nd unfair slam at Venezuela. A strange claim that Iceland "levied too much of its taxes on property" when actually it levied taxes on transactions: transactions taxes are not property taxes--they are turnover taxes. But all in all, he says some smart things. Alexander Hamilton thought that by the 1780s "the science of politics... has received great improvement" since the age of classical Athens and Rome. Alexnder Hamilton would weep at California today: Federalist No. 9: It is impossible to read the history of the petty republics of Greece and Italy without feeling sensations of horror and disgust at the distractions with which they were continually agitated... perpetual vibration between the extremes of tyranny and anarchy. If they exhibit occasional calms, these only serve as short-lived contrast to the furious storms that are to succeed. If now and then intervals of felicity open to view, we behold them with a mixture of regret, arising from the reflection that the pleasing scenes before us are soon to be overwhelmed by the tempestuous waves of sedition and party rage. If momentary rays of glory break forth from the gloom, while they dazzle us with a transient and fleeting brilliancy, they at the same time admonish us to lament that the vices of government should pervert the http://delong.typepad.com/sdj/2009/07/christopher-caldwell-on-a-failure-of-direct-democracy.html

Page 2 of 5

Christopher Caldwell on a Failure of Direct Democracy

7/26/09 3:18 PM

and fleeting brilliancy, they at the same time admonish us to lament that the vices of government should pervert the direction and tarnish the lustre of those bright talents and exalted endowments for which the favored soils that produced them have been so justly celebrated.... [I]t not to be denied that the portraits they have sketched of republican government were too just copies of the originals from which they were taken. If it had been found impracticable to have devised models of a more perfect structure, the enlightened friends to liberty would have been obliged to abandon the cause of that species of government as indefensible. The science of politics, however, like most other sciences, has received great improvement. The efficacy of various principles is now well understood, which were either not known at all, or imperfectly known to the ancients... rated 3.68 by you and 6 others [? ] You loved this post (

), you might also like:

Some Unlucky Numbers for Opponents of Proposition 13 (by Don Boudreaux) (@Cafe Hayek) How long will Californiaâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s budget fix last? (@MNpublius.com) 2 more recommended posts Âť Brad DeLong on July 24, 2009 at 04:52 PM in Economics, Economics: Fiscal Policy, History, Political Economy, Politics | Permalink TrackBack TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00e551f08003883401157231d5cc970b Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Christopher Caldwell on a Failure of Direct Democracy:

Comments You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post. Direct democracy isn't the problem here, lack of pay-go or similar budgeting rules is. There's no problem with a proposition for a spending increase or a tax decrease so long as it is required to be accompanied by an offsetting revenue increase, or a detailed plan for how loans will be paid off in a timely manner and with a high degree of certainty. Posted by: anonymous | July 24, 2009 at 05:47 PM @anonymous Yes, but essentially real tax increases (as opposed to hidden ones) are nearly impossible these days. They are a "3rd rail". To simply declare, as one might if you were sane, "We're increasing the income tax by 1% (or something thereof)," is the kiss of political death. Thus "Pay as you go" means only cutting services or accounting gimmicks. Since most state governments these days have required balanced budgets and cannot print money, the "Pay as you go" is actually effectively in place and highly problematic. Posted by: Matt Fahrner | July 24, 2009 at 06:38 PM As the Philosopher King, what would you do? That's what we all want to know. Posted by: Nancy Kirsch | July 24, 2009 at 06:57 PM "the philosophy of Democrats (who stand for spending more than you raise)" Who cares what yet another Tory commenter thinks about California, especially if he thinks something so idiotic and otherwise says nothing new? Posted by: anon of the moment | July 24, 2009 at 07:06 PM

http://delong.typepad.com/sdj/2009/07/christopher-caldwell-on-a-failure-of-direct-democracy.html

Page 3 of 5

Christopher Caldwell on a Failure of Direct Democracy

7/26/09 3:18 PM

Jeebus, I thought the failure was the Guvanator never fulfilled his responsibilities as chief executive and delivered a budget that made long term fiscal sense. It was his job to start putting restraints on spending, and he didn't do it. This decade for spending in Cali has been a mistake based as it was based on Greenspamism, and I'd be damned if I'm expected to help out. Guv Arnie doesn't fit into the Christianist Republican Party; he fits naturally into the Reagan Democrats. But he isn't one of them. He didn't want to be there as it does not play in prime-time with our controlled media. A Reagan Democrat pHilosopher-king; I object. Posted by: christofay | July 24, 2009 at 08:22 PM "A strange claim that Iceland "levied too much of its taxes on property" when actually it levied taxes on transactions: transactions taxes are not property taxes--they are turnover taxes." Isn't it Ireland, not Iceland? Posted by: Min | July 24, 2009 at 08:56 PM While Caldwell is casting a pox on both Dems and Reps, he fails to mention the supermajority constraint on raising taxes. Majority rule is hard enough in a democracy. Just getting a majority is tough. When you require 2/3s for anything, you are handing power to the birthers and other assorted wackos. Posted by: Bruce Wilder | July 24, 2009 at 09:41 PM Matt Fahrner: I disagree. People are willing to pay higher taxes for something they think is worthwhile--perhaps not in a recession, but that's to be expected. And even if the majority isn't willing to pay themselves, they're often willing to make someone else pay (sin taxes, rich taxes, windfall profits tax, etc.). So paying for what we want isn't a problem, so long as we have some discipline to ensure that we do so, i.e. pay-go. Posted by: anonymous | July 25, 2009 at 11:42 AM Direct democracy ensures that if the people screw up in their governing decisions, they only have themselves to blame. They can't simply pass off responsibility to an elected official who only does exactly what the people want him to do and then, when the people's preferred actions lead to catastrophe, gets replaced by another elected official again promising to do exactly what the people want. Posted by: anonymous | July 25, 2009 at 11:45 AM

Verify your Comment Previewing your Comment Posted by: | This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted. Post

Edit

Your comment could not be posted. Error type: Your comment has been posted. Post another comment The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again. As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments. Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate. Continue

Me:

Economists:

Juicebox Mafia: Moral Philosophers:

http://delong.typepad.com/sdj/2009/07/christopher-caldwell-on-a-failure-of-direct-democracy.html

Page 4 of 5

Christopher Caldwell on a Failure of Direct Democracy

Paul Krugman Mark Thoma Cowen and Tabarrok Chinn and Hamilton Brad Setser

Ezra Klein Matthew Yglesias Spencer Ackerman Dana Goldstein Dan Froomkin

7/26/09 3:18 PM

Philosophers: Hilzoy and Friends Crooked Timber of Humanity Mark Kleiman and Friends Eric Rauchway and Friends John Holbo and Friends

http://delong.typepad.com/sdj/2009/07/christopher-caldwell-on-a-failure-of-direct-democracy.html

Page 5 of 5