DeLong Smackdown Watch (David Wessel/Marx-Schumpeter-Hoover-Mellon Axis Edition)
8/5/09 10:29 PM
Grasping Reality with Both Hands The Semi-Daily Journal of Economist Brad DeLong: A Fair, Balanced, Reality-Based, and More than Two-Handed Look at the World J. Bradford DeLong, Department of Economics, U.C. Berkeley #3880, Berkeley, CA 94720-3880; 925 708 0467; delong@econ.berkeley.edu.
Support this weblog | About This Website | About Brad DeLong | This Weblog | Weblog RSS feed | Brad DeLong's Egregious Moderation | Order of the Shrill | Office Hours: Evans 601, by appointment, email delong@econ.berkeley.edu | Academic C.V. | John Yoo and the Torture Memo | Audio and Video Read the comment policy: no drive-bys, and if you bring information and humor you will be fine... Make 6% per mo. in ETFs Easier than forex. No hype. Proven System. Trade only 5 min per night.
Smith Economics Group LTD Economics Homework Help CALL - Leader in Forensic Economics Micro / Macro Economics Homework Nationwide Expertise - 312.943.1551 Help by Economics Professors
ETFmentor.com
www.SmithEconomics.com
www.ASAPTutor.com
Weblog Home Page Weblog Archives Econ 115: 20th Century Economic History Econ 211: Economic History Seminar Economics Should-Reads Political Economy Should-Reads Politics and Elections Should-Reads Hot on Google Blogsearch Hot on Google Brad DeLong's Egregious Moderation August 04, 2009
DeLong Smackdown Watch (David Wessel/Marx-Schumpeter-Hoover-Mellon Axis Edition) On page 46 of David Wessel (2009), In Fed We Trust: Ben Bernanke's War on the Great Panic (New York: Crown: 9780307459688), I read:
http://delong.typepad.com/sdj/2009/08/delong-smackdown-watch-david-wesselmarx-schumpeter-hoover-mellon-axis-edition.html
Page 1 of 3
DeLong Smackdown Watch (David Wessel/Marx-Schumpeter-Hoover-Mellon Axis Edition)
8/5/09 10:29 PM
This notion of the government's [macroeconomic stabilization] role was not universal in the 1930s. In his memoirs, Herbert Hoover described tension within his own administration, putting words into Treasury Secretary Andrew Mellon's mouth that are routinely reported as something Mellon actually said: In one camp were the "leave it alone liquidationts" headed by Secretary Mellon, who felt that government must keep its hands off and let the slump liquidate itself. Mr. Mellon had only one formula: "Liquidate labor, liquidate stocks, liquidate the farmers, liquidate real estate." He held that even panic was not altogether a bad thing. He said: "It will purge the rottenness out of the system. High costs of living and high living will come down. People will work harder, live a more moral life. Values will be adjusted, and enterprising people will pick up the wrecks from less competent people"... Who is it "routinely reports" something like this? Moi! This is actually a difficult question, which I hope to write up properly someday: 1. Hoover in his memoirs is definitely an unreliable narrator. He sets himself up as opposing Mellon within the administration, when actually when push came to shove he (reluctantly) supported Mellon. As Wessel notes on page 47, he gave himself in the early 1930s excessive vision as to the size of the problem. And he claimed that he had nothing to do with the MacArthur-Eisenhower-Patton military police action against the Bonus Marchers on the Mall. 2. Hoover's unreliability centers around two issues: (a) Hoover insists--no matter what the evidence--that everything was going fine and the depression was licked until the election of THAT COMMUNIST ROOSEVELT; (b) any mistakes made during his administration were the fault of unworthy subordinates--MacArthur, Mellon--who misled Hoover. I conclude that it is hardly credible to believe that MacArthur pleaded with Hoover to conciliate the Bonus Marchers-instead, Hoover's unreliability is focused on taking decisions that were joint that Hoover is not proud of, and loading them onto others. Similarly, I conclude that it is hardly credible to believe that Mellon pleaded with Hoover to boost demand. Instead, Mellon called to stay the course--no experiments, and either a program of monetary expansion, a banking recapitalization, a banking nationalization, a deficit spending plan, or government employment of the unemployed would definitely have been experiments: Conditions today are neither so critical nor so unprecedented as to justify a lack of faith in our ability to deal with them in our accustomed way.... [The middle of the Great Depression was] no time to undertake drastic experiments... surrendering the management of business and industry to government or to any board or group of men... So Hoover is an unreliable narrator. But odds are that his claims that, internally, Mellon was a liquidationist are sound. rated 3.03 by you and 7 others [? ] You loved this post (
), you might also like:
Patricia Cohen: Tracking News Life Cycles With Systems Like Media Cloud (@this site) I Am Using This Quote in a Manner Highly Derogatory to the Associated Press (@this site) 2 more recommended posts Âť Brad DeLong on August 04, 2009 at 08:55 PM in Economics, Economics: Great Depression, Economics: History, History | Permalink TrackBack TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00e551f0800388340120a4c7fa08970b
http://delong.typepad.com/sdj/2009/08/delong-smackdown-watch-david-wesselmarx-schumpeter-hoover-mellon-axis-edition.html
Page 2 of 3
DeLong Smackdown Watch (David Wessel/Marx-Schumpeter-Hoover-Mellon Axis Edition)
8/5/09 10:29 PM
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference DeLong Smackdown Watch (David Wessel/Marx-Schumpeter-Hoover-Mellon Axis Edition):
Comments You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post. Mellon died in'37, and so wasn't around to defend hismelf when Hoover published his memoirs in'52. Posted by: rea | August 05, 2009 at 05:58 AM It is remarkable that Republicans of that day were so much more eloquent at saying the sames things as Republicans of today: Do nothing. The patient may health himself in time. Posted by: ISLM | August 05, 2009 at 09:54 AM There is a difference between MacArthur and Mellon: in the former case Hoover is blaming something that actually happened on someone else, in the latter he's portraying an opponent of his own actions whose advice was rejected (wisely, we are led to believe). Hoover is proud of his own actions in the latter case. Mellon actually is on record supporting rate cuts, increased spending (even despite the raised taxes Hoover still ran large deficits, arguably more Keynesian than FDR's first term) particularly in construction and the creation of the NCC and later RFC. Posted by: TGGP | August 05, 2009 at 09:55 AM
Verify your Comment Previewing your Comment Posted by: | This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted. Post
Edit
Your comment could not be posted. Error type: Your comment has been posted. Post another comment The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again. As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments. Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate. Continue
Me:
Economists: Paul Krugman Mark Thoma Cowen and Tabarrok Chinn and Hamilton Brad Setser
Juicebox Mafia: Moral Ezra Klein Philosophers: Matthew Yglesias Hilzoy and Spencer Friends Ackerman Crooked Timber Dana Goldstein of Humanity Dan Froomkin Mark Kleiman and Friends Eric Rauchway and Friends John Holbo and Friends
http://delong.typepad.com/sdj/2009/08/delong-smackdown-watch-david-wesselmarx-schumpeter-hoover-mellon-axis-edition.html
Page 3 of 3