The DePaulia 4/29

Page 1

DePaulia

The

Volume #103 | Issue #23 | April 29, 2019 | depauliaonline.com

During a controversial week, we get advice from someone who’s been there By The DePaulia Editorial Board

JEFF CARRION | DEPAUL UNIVERSITY

Executive editor of the New York Times Dean Baquet speaks with Carol Marin on Thursday.

JESUS MONTERO | THE DEPAULIA

Baquet speaks at the awards ceremony at the Union League Club. The event, which also honored WGN anchor and DePaul alumna Lourdes Duarte, honored the two journalists for their careers as fearless reporters.

You might have heard by now about the swirl of controversy that The DePaulia found itself in last week. It was a tidal wave of ethical quandaries, the likes of which we have never dealt with before. We found ourselves accused of exploiting victims of sexual assault. We had hundreds of our newspapers stolen off of newsstands in Lincoln Park. And we got reamed out by the Title IX office for an important story we published on the front page — a story whose facts we stand behind completely. Luckily, we had someone visit DePaul on Thursday who deals with these ethical issues every day. Issues that, if handled incorrectly, could cause markets to tumble, innocent people to be accused and even lead to the loss of human life. Executive editor of the New York Times Dean Baquet was honored with DePaul’s Center for Journalism Excellence and Integrity Distinguished Journalist Award. As the leader of the Times’ newsroom, Baquet and his staff of reporters cover the administration of President Donald Trump, high-stakes national security issues, global war and strife, all “without fear or favor,” as

the paper’s famous motto goes. We asked Baquet what he would do if he were in our position. “The first thing I would do is write an editorial,” he said. Good advice. A student was upset about how we used an image of them taken at a public event. Anytime anybody is in a public place, you are subject to being photographed, even if you don’t expressly give permission, and that photograph is legally and ethically allowed to be published. In other words, by appearing in public, you forego your right to privacy. On top of this, there were multiple photographers at this event, announcements were made that you were subject to photography if you’re in the area and signs were posted. Everyone there knew. But word spread around Twitter and the comments section of The DePaulia’s website, saying that we were exploiting people for our own glory, that we were insensitive and should be ashamed of ourselves. This was neither our intention nor what we did. When we cover sensitive subjects like sexual assault, which we covered extensively in last week’s issue and

See EDITORIAL, page 4

Fallout from professor’s ‘Islamophobic’ article continues By Benjamin Conboy Editor-in-Chief

Aggrieved students were vocal this week about their desire for DePaul to censure Professor Jason Hill over an article he wrote last week in The Federalist, a right-wing online news magazine, in which he wrote that Israel has “the moral right” to annex the West Bank and strip Arabs living in Israel of their right to vote. Students organized a protest in Arts & Letters in the early afternoon of Wednesday, April 24 to express their frustration with the inaction on the part of the DePaul administration. A coalition of student groups last week put out a statement that called on DePaul to censure Hill for the “Islamophobic” and “racist” views espoused in the article. “We call on the administration to stand against hate, to stand against racism,” the protestors chanted as they dropped fliers from the upper floors of the building’s atrium and draped signs over the banisters saying “DePaul Must Dump Hill.” Within 30 minutes of the culmination of the protest, DANAKA KATOVICH | COLLEGE DEMOCRATS President A. Gabriel Esteban emailed a letter to the DePaul Protestors in Arts & Letters Wednesday calling for DePaul to censure against Professor Jason Hill for an article in which he outlines community outlining his position on the controversy the moral argument for allowing Israel to annex the West Bank and stip Arabs living in Israel of their right to vote. surrounding Hill. “DePaul [...] holds academic freedom in the highest respect, always aware of the potential impact of our words the demands and desires of the student body. regard,” Esteban wrote. “When professors speak or write on and actions. Both of these outcomes are achievable.” “We weren’t calling for DePaul to fire him, we just topics that prompt strongly-held, divergent perspectives, Esteban’s letter did little to satisfy the dozens of upset wanted them to say that this was unacceptable,” Afzal the question of academic freedom often arises. students who felt offended and even personally attacked said. “The administration hasn’t really learned how to take “Should faculty be allowed to express a provocative by Hill’s language. Some students like Hadyia Afazal, a students seriously when it comes to these debates, which is position?” Esteban continued. “The short answer is yes. member of the DePaul Democrats, said Esteban’s statement disappointing.” Yet, DePaul aspires to be a community marked by mutual just goes to show that DePaul still isn’t good at listening to

See FALLOUT, page 6


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.