STEP Skills Development and Competitions CONTEST AREA: Industrial Arts CONTEST PACKAGE
YEAR LEVEL: Third and Fourth Year
ASSESSMENT
Number of Participants: 1
PROCEDURE/SPECIFICATIONS
RESOURCES T
Hat Weaving
CRITERIA
PERCENTAGE
PRELIMINARY ACTIVITIES a. Contest registration of trainers and contestants.
TIME ALLOTMENT
b. Su S bmission i i off required i dd t document s f or th e conttest.
Craftsmanship
50% c. Briefing/orientation of trainers with the contest administrator a
day before the actual competition.
4 hours DESCRIPTION
Woven hat from indigenous raw materials, minimum of 8 inches brim, accessorized with dried flowers, leaves, or other indigenous materials, sinamay ribbons/ribonnets
ILLUSTRATION
d. Inspection and distribution of contest materials.
Creativity
10%
administrator (10 minutes).
10% AFTER
Communication Skills
5%
c All endorsed outputs shall be displayed until the duration of c.
the skills competition.
EMPLOYABILITY OR BUSINESS OPPORTUNITY
Hat Weaver/Entrepreneur
NOTES TOTAL
ATTACHMENT(S) Serves as an accessory to a lady's outfit as well as protection from the heat of the sun specially during hot/summer days.
Analytic Scoring Rubrics/ Percentage Table
FORM OF JUDGING Compatriot Judging
T O O L S
100%
T M A T E R I A L S
b. pull-push rule c. hat mold
a. With regard to the provision of resources, the division and
regional organizers may opt to deviate. b. Coaches are allowed to observe the process within 3 meter
range.
a. Any of the following raw materials, prepared and cut into .5 cm. width strips:
- pandan - buri - karagumoy
a. Design may vary as long as the specified measurement is
followed.
a. Trainers shall serve as judges. b. All outputs shall be endorsed to the Secretariat by the
Contest Administrator.
Working Plan
USE
a. Briefing of trainers and contestants with the contest b. Final instructions of trainers with their contestants. c. Inspection of contest materials, tools and equipments.
Time Management
Organizer/s
25% DURING
Safety
Contestant/s a. knife /cutter/scissors
b. Size of hat mold should be standard (fits the standard size
O T H E R S
of female head)
ANALYTIC PERFORMANCE SCORING RUBRICS FOR HAT WEAVING CRITERIA A. CRAFTSMANSHIP 1. Preparation of raw materials
PERFORMANCE INDICATOR 50%
85 • Raw materials were wellprepared except for 2 which were either tough, rough, soiled/stained. • The strips conformed with given measurement except for 6-10 strips noted with different measurement ; • Uniform and even weave except for 2 portions with either loose or tight weave. • Observed 2 instances where either start or ends of strips were visible • Noted 2 parts which were inaccurately measured • The base of the hat fitted on the hat mold but with a moderate tightness/looseness noted in a certain area • Design was a replica of those designs available in the market
80 • Some of the prepared materials were tough, rough, soiled/stained.
• Observed safety precaution at all times when working
90 • Raw materials were wellprepared except for 1 which was either rough, soiled/stained. • The strips conformed with given measurement except for 4-5 strips noted with different measurement • Uniform and even weave except for a portion with either loose or tight weave. • Observed 1 instance where either start or end of strips was visible • Noted 1 part which was inaccurately measured • The base of the hat fitted on the hat mold but with a slight tightness / looseness noted in a certain area • Design was an artistic innovation of existing designs available in the market • All raw materials used are indigenous and appropriate to the purpose and design except for 1 accessory which is not an indigenous material • Observed safety precautions but was noted to fail once.
• All raw materials used are indigenous and appropriate to the purpose and design but the accessories are not indigenous materials • Observed safety precautions but was noted to fail twice.
• Used raw materials and accessories which are not available in the locality and are inappropriate as to purpose and design. • Observed safety precautions but was noted to fail thrice.
• Finished the output 10 minutes before the allotted time • Able to discuss/explain with confidence all of the following: a. process b. function of tools, materials and equipment c. cost of production d. employability e. business opportunity
• Finished the output 5 minutes before the allotted time • Able to discuss/explain with confidence 4 of the following: a. process b. function of tools, materials and equipment c. cost of production d. employability e. business opportunity
• Finished output within the allotted time • Able to discuss/explain with confidence 3 of the following: a. process b. function of tools, materials and equipment c. cost of production d. employability e. business opportunity
• Was not able to finish output within the allotted time • Able to discuss/explain with confidence 2 of the following: a. process b. function of tools, materials and equipment c. cost of production d. employability e. business opportunity
95 • Raw materials were wellprepared, soft, smooth and clean • All strips conformed with the given measurement
2. Uniformity of strips and weave
• Uniform and even weave throughout the design 3. Neatness
• Start and ends of strips were not visible
4. Accuracy
• All measurements were accurate • The base of the hat fitted perfectly on the hat mold
5. Fitting
B. CREATIVITY 1. Design
25%
• Design was artistic and original
15%
2. Choice of Materials and accessories 10%
C. SAFETY
10%
D. TIME MANAGEMENT
10%
E. COMMUNICATION SKILLS (3-5 minutes only)
5%
• All raw materials and accessories used are indigenous and appropriate to the purpose and design
• Most of the strips used did not conform to the given measurement • Weaves in some portions were uneven (tight or loose weaves). • Observed 3 or more instances where both start or ends of strips were visible • Noted 3 parts which were inaccurately measured • The base of the hat was very tightly fitted / loosely fitted on the hat mold • Design was obsolete.