Can treatment as prevention work for hepatitis C? The advent of better drugs has helped increase interest in treatment as prevention for hepatitis C (HCV). With tomorrow’s #WorldHepatitisDay drawing global attention to the condition, David Rowlands examines the issues and the responses to his latest online poll, which asked whether rates of HCV reinfection would increase in London over the next decade.
Encouraged by the results of using Treatment as Prevention (TasP) in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), researchers are considering this as an approach to deal with widespread hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. Part of the reason for the interest in TasP for HCV is that combinations of new, simpler, better-tolerated and interferonfree regimens have become available in many high-income countries in 2015. The past decade has seen epidemics of HCV among men who have sex with men (MSM) with HIV infection in Europe, North America and Australia. These infections appear to be due to a combination of sexual risk factors. To what extent can TasP impact this rising trend?
HIV treatment path informs HCV It was not until 30 years into the AIDS epidemic that the HPTN 052 study showed that early antiretroviral therapy reduced HIV transmission in serodiscordant heterosexual couples by 96 per cent. More recently, researchers with the PARTNERS
study reported that no transmissions occurred among mixed-status heterosexual couples that did not use condoms if the positive partner was on HIV treatment with suppressed viral load. Lessons learned from HIV have enabled faster progression of advances in the HCV arena. Next-generation direct-acting antiviral agents (DAAs) combined in interferon-free regimens are now routinely curing 90-100 per cent of clinical trial participants, including traditionally difficult-to-treat groups such as people with liver cirrhosis or HIV/ HCV coinfection. Given these promising results, researchers are asking whether prompt and widespread treatment could reduce HCV transmission, especially among groups with high incidence (new infections) and prevalence (total existing infections) rates, such as people who inject drugs (PWID). The success of TasP for HCV would depend on a number of parameters, including chronic HCV prevalence and rate of treatment uptake in a local PWID population. These numbers can
David Rowlands
vary widely. Chronic HCV prevalence, for example, ranges from 25 per cent in Edinburgh to 50 per cent in Melbourne to 65 per cent in Vancouver. Individual-level benefit favours treating the sickest patients first, but on a population level, treating someone earlier may not immediately benefit them, but could prevent many new infections.