D
E V E L O P M E N T
ISS ues Volume 4, number 1, April 2002
What Good is Globalization for Developing Countries?
CONTENTS
Inside this issue:
3
Page
Terrorism and International Law Nico Schrijver
On 28 February, Rector Hans Opschoor opened the 50th Anniversary Programme of the ISS by introducing the first in a series of public debates at the Institute. The debate, entitled ‘What Good is Globalization for Developing
4
Page
An Unfinished Journey Interview with Christine Sylvester
Countries?’, provided a lively start to the Anniversary Year. The two main protagonists, Professor Immanuel Wallerstein, renowned for his work on the history of the world system, and Professor Jan Willem Gunning of the Free University of Amsterdam, proved worthy adversaries and the comments from
5
Page
the floor gave them plenty of fuel for discussion and food for thought.
Alumni News
Professor Immanuel Wallerstein
6
Page
50 Years of the ISS
7
Page
SCHOLAS ORPAS Project News
8
Page
Sustainable development and the ISS Mohamed Salih Page
10
Staff News
The debate, facilitated by Dr Wil Hout
in the global economy influenced
it is new at all. The capitalist world
the claim that development had been
of the ISS, was divided into two
people in the South?
market has been integrated since at
bypassed by globalization. There is
rounds, the first on the history of glo-
Professor Wallerstein opened by
least the middle of the 19th century
no point, he said, in looking at statis-
balization and the developing world,
noting that the ISS itself is a historical
and production was already transna-
tics that focus on relative levels. You
and the second on globalization and
marker, set up in the post-war period
tional in the 17th and 18th centuries.
have to look at changes, in growth
worldwide inequality. Setting the
as an expression of the new concern
Globalization is basically a return to
rates. And to look at those properly,
scene for the first round, Wil Hout
with development. He immediately
laissez-faire policies. The real issue
you should begin by abandoning
said that there tends to be a focus on
threw down the gauntlet by claiming
under debate is whether frontiers
aggregates like the industrialised and
the unprecedented nature of globali-
that globalization came along in the
should be open to allow the free flow
the developing world. The differences
zation and its positive effects. But it
latter decades of the 20th century to
of factors of production. No nation
between developing countries are
also appears to be a highly uneven
end what had become a ‘dubious
wants to open its frontiers entirely,
growing, and that is the big story, not
process. The bulk of international
discourse’ on development.
even the US, which is the most ardent
the gap between industrial and deve-
trade and financial transactions take
Development implied that states and
advocate of free flows today. So the
loping countries.
place in the industrialized world -
governments should actively assist
industrialized nations preach one poli-
mostly in the ‘triad’ of North America,
other states and governments to
cy abroad and another at home. And
Professor Gunning then addressed
Western Europe and East Asia, espe-
move forward; globalization implies
they reprimand other countries that
the first question: what does history
cially Japan.
that states and governments should
do the same. There is nothing new in
tell us about globalization? Firstly, he
stop doing this, open their frontiers
this, it is one of the cyclical features of
said, in the past 400 years or so, there
and let the market do its work.
a capitalist world economy in which
have been periods of phenomenal
the constant issue is: what will enable
divergence and convergence, both
us to accumulate capital?
with and without globalization. So his-
The first round addressed three questions: How should globalization be understood from a historical per-
Plus ça change…
spective? What impact does globali-
Globalization, he said, is not a useful
zation have on developing countries?
term. It suggests that there is some-
At this point Professor Gunning took
How has the integration of the deve-
thing new in the history of the modern
over and immediately set the tone for
loping countries
world system and he does not believe
the ensuing discussion by denying
tory does not suggest that globalization necessarily increases inequality. continued on page 11
50 Years of the ISS As an institute for advanced international education and research, the ISS generates,
The ISS 50th Anniversary celebrations are now well underway. The first two public debates in the special series have already taken place. The first, on ‘What good is globalization for developing countries?’, with worldrenowned sociologist Immanuel Wallerstein, drew a full house. You can read the report on that debate above
accumulates and transfers
and continued on page 11. Reports on the other debates will follow in later issues of Development ISSues. We knowledge and know-how on
also have the next in our series of articles on the history of the ISS by key figures in the Institute’s past. On page
human aspects of economic
6, Dirk J. Wolfson describes the ups and downs of his time as Rector (1986-1990). Also on page 6, Martin Blok
and social change, with a focus
outlines some of the cultural events that will be marking the 50th Anniversary year. On the back page, there are
on development and transition.
details of the programme for the rest of the year.
The ISS is a leading centre in this field.
Development ISSues is also available online on the ISS website at www.iss.nl
1