January 2013 Issue of Courier

Page 1

THE COURIER

January 2013

Roman Catholic Diocese of Winona

Volume 104, No. 1

A Powerful Voice for the Silenced

Rebecca Kiessling, an internationally renowned Pro-Life speaker, agreed to an interview for our Courier with associate editor, Theresa Martin. The following is the story she shared so graciously with us. If you saw her on the street or with a ‘product of rape’, I am a child of God. her precious children, Rebecca Kiessling Though my mother and father forsake looks like any other happy, beautiful me, the Lord will receive me.” She said, mother. Yet, her story will rock you to “I look to the Cross … He must have your core. Can you remember what your thought I was pretty valuable.” She is now a lawyer and married to a parents told you about your birth? My parents spoke about it with such love, and most of you probably have similar experiences. How would you feel if you found out that your life started a different way? In a very sad way? That is Rebecca's story. Adopted from birth, when she was 18, she wanted to find out who her birth parents were. However, on the birth certificate it had her mother’s name, but only “Caucasian, large build” for her father. Rebecca needed more answers. “I had to know,” she said. When she finally met her birth mother, Joann, “she told me that I had been conceived in brutal rape at knife point by a serial rapist.” Her mother told her she had tried to abort her. But because abortion was illegal at the time, her mother could not find a trustworthy place that would perform the abortion. And after two different abortion attempts, she decided to give the baby up for adoption. Rebecca Kiessling works to be a hero for the The news devastated her. “I felt like unborn, since pro-life activists saved her life. garbage, worthless, because of people wonderful man (for fourteen years) and who tell me I am disposable. If abor- homeschools their five beautiful children tion was legal, she would have aborted (3 theirs by birth, 2 through adoption me.” She recalls, “(I) felt targeted and and she has 3 other children in heaven, de-valued, and I felt I needed to prove two through miscarriage and their secmy worth to the world.” Whenever she ond adopted baby Cassie who died in our heard the words: “except in cases of rape, arms at 33 days old, born with a seriincest or life of the mother,” it cut her to ous genetic disorder). She is very active in the Pro-Life movement and speaks the heart. Then something wonderful happened. on behalf of the unborn. “I wasn’t just She grew in her faith and got to know lucky, I was protected,” she said, “My our Lord Jesus. She realized, “I am not mother chose abortion for me, but pro-

life activists who didn’t even know me, recognized that mine was a life worth saving. Abortion was illegal in Michigan - no exceptions, no compromises.” She explained that her birthmother has since changed her views on abortion and is thankful for the laws that were in place that saved her and Rebecca from the horrors of abortion. Rebecca knows it was the pro-life activists who saved her life. They valued her, she said, “they got it, and said, ‘you matter; yours was a life worth saving.’ They are my heroes.” So, be bolstered in your ministry to save the unborn! Rebecca reminds us that we must not condemn anyone, but gently and resolutely challenge them. Challenge them to remember that abortion hurts women and kills children. Children who could grow up and be as beautiful a person as Rebecca. As we work to protect all life from conception to natural death, let us all remember Rebecca. She is a voice for those who are silenced without even a chance to learn to speak, without being valued enough to deem worthy of life at all. Conceived in rape, she was one of those children especially targeted for abortion. Her voice is a real reminder that a child is a child no matter the circumstances of his or her life’s beginnings. Christ came to save those children too! God’s love and life lives in every one of them. Let us be fortified in our Pro-life mission as Rebecca is in hers; determined to be heroes to the next child; telling them, “Your life is worth it! Your life is worth saving! Your life is precious! You have immense, immeasurable value!”

INSIDE Vocation Awareness Week

More on page 6

40th Anniversary of Roe v Wade

More on page 4

Immigration Sunday Minnesota

More on page 10

Self-Righteousness, A Luxury We Can No Longer Afford Comparing Abortion and Slavery as Issues Dividing our Society By Rev. James F. Buryska, S.T.L.

There are two issues that are deeply divisive for our nation. It seems we could learn from a comparison of the societal and political dynamics of two issues as well as an examination of the quality of our discourse about them. Parallels between slavery (prior to and during the Civil War) and abortion (in the last quarter of the Twentieth Century and up to the present) are striking. Both are issues over which the minds and hearts of people are deeply divided, seen as fundamental moral issues. The rhetoric of debate is surprisingly similar in tone. Civil War historian Bruce Catton observes, “Slavery was the one issue that could not be compromised,

that made men so angry that they didn’t want to compromise.” The view that black slaves are not human persons in the sense of having rights, seemed self-evident to its adherents and self-evidently wrong to its opponents in the 19th century; the same applies to abortion today. Each issue is framed by a landmark Supreme Court decision (Dred Scott and Roe v. Wade, respectively), which had the effect of withholding the legal status and protection accorded the human person from an entire class of beings. From Chief Justice Roger Taney’s Dred Scott Decision: “On the contrary, they (negroes) were at that time (when the U.S. Constitution was adopted) consid-

ered as a subordinate and inferior class of beings, who had been subjugated by the dominant race, and, whether emancipated or not, yet remained subject to their authority, and had no rights or privileges but such as those who held the power and the Government might choose to grant them.” Justice Blackmun in Roe v. Wade: “The Constitution does not define ‘person’ in so many words. But in nearly all … instances, the use of the word is such that it has application only postnatally … All this … persuades us that the word ‘person’ as used in the Fourteenth Amendment does not include the unborn.” Divisive Issues, cont. on pg. 4


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.