5 minute read

Holy Hour for Vocations fills hearts of the faithful

By Deacon Patrick Cline Correspondent

On our own, we are not worthy, stated Father Thomas W. Lanza to those seated in the Cathedral of St. Francis of Assisi June 23, “but Jesus makes us worthy. You will be made worthy.”

The Diocese of Metuchen celebrates a Holy Hour for Vocations and the Sanctification of Priests each year on the Friday evening before priesthood ordinations. This year Bishop James F. Checchio was principal celebrant of the prayer service which began with Exposition of the Blessed Sacrament. The congregation included the Rev. Mr. Jose Lim, due to be ordained the following day, priests and seminarians, consecrated religious women and men and faithful from throughout the diocese.

The sung service was Evening Prayer I of the Nativity of St John the Baptist, recalling the observation of Bishop Checchio that, along with Our Blessed Mother and St. Joseph, he is the only saint to have two feast days, “which points to the exceptional man he was.”

In his homily, Father Lanza, who serves as director of the diocesan Office of Vocations, quoted the Acts of the Apostles where St. John the Baptist stated, “I am not worthy to unfasten the sandals on his feet.” He reminded the congregation of the prayer that all Catholics say before receiving the Eucharist – “Lord, I am not worthy that you should enter under my roof but only say the word and my soul shall be healed.” – then proclaimed, “I am not worthy, we are not worthy” be- fore pointing to the Blessed Sacrament enthroned in the Monstrance on the altar, and adding, “But you are worthy.”

Father Lanza related an encounter with a very ill patient he visited in a hospital who upon recovering assured him, “You are where you are meant to be.” Recalling his own ordination three years ago lying prostrate in the Cathedral sanctuary he said to Deacon Lim, “As a priest you will lay down your life for God, but Jesus will raise you up, and you will do powerful things with Jesus working through you. You will be made an ambassador of God’s love and an agent of reconciliation.”

Father Lanza ended his homily by praying, “May God bless Jose, all our seminarians and all those discerning a vocation to the priesthood. It is a great life”

Following the homily there was a period of silence for personal prayer and reflection before the Blessed Sacrament. The evening ended with solemn Benediction.

Rev. Mr. Ai Van (Peter) Phan, who will serve at the parish of St. Bernard of Clairvaux in Bridgewater during his diaconate year, said, “The prayer service reminded me of all the people whose prayers and support have contributed to my vocation. I would not be where I am today without them.” witness that with an openness to the will of the Father, every piece of a story can be transformed for the greater Glory of God.

James Prumos, who will begin his second theology year at Immaculate Conception Seminary in August, believes the evening showed the prayers and support of the people of the diocese for all the men called to the priesthood.

Compiled from Our Sunday Visitor HEADLINES

Supreme Court rejects Biden student loan forgiveness for millions of Americans

WASHINGTON (OSV News) – The U.S. Supreme Court June 30 rejected President Joe Biden’s $400 billion plan to cancel or significantly reduce federal student loan debts for millions of Americans. The Biden administration’s student debt forgiveness program would have canceled $10,000 in such debts for individuals making less than $125,000 or households making less than $250,000. Pell Grant recipients would have been granted an additional $10,000 in debt forgiven. The Biden administration had argued the plan was lawful under a 2003 law called the Higher Education Relief Opportunities for Students Act, or HEROES Act, which permits the government to provide some relief to recipients of student loans in a “national emergency,” to ensure borrow ers are not left in financial difficulty as a result of such an emergency. But Chief Justice John Roberts, writing for a 6-3 majority, rejected that argument, arguing that the court’s precedent “requires that Congress speak clearly before a depart ment secretary can unilaterally alter large sections of the American economy,”

Supreme Court expands protections for workers seeking to observe holy days, Sunday rest

arguing the Biden administration overstepped its authority. After a more than three-year, COVID-era pause, borrowers will have to resume payments on their federal student loan bills this fall.

A sign calling for student loan debt relief is seen in front of the U.S. Supreme Court in Washington Feb. 28, 2023. The Supreme Court June 30 rejected President Joe Biden’s $400 billion plan to cancel or significantly reduce federal student loan debts for millions of Americans. —OSV News photo/Nathan Howard, Reuters

High court strikes down affirmative action admission policies backed by Catholic universities

WASHINGTON (OSV News) – The U.S. Supreme Court ruled June 29 that institutions of higher education can no longer take race into consideration for admission, a landmark decision overturning previous precedent supported by many Catholic universities and colleges. As it has been used in higher education, affirmative action includes admissions practices that purport to increase the number of students admitted from his torically marginalized groups, such as Black and Hispanic students. Colleges and universities that take race into con sideration have argued that doing so is only one factor in a broader admissions process, which also includes a student’s grades, test scores and extracurricular ac tivities. Supporters of affirmative action policies argue that it is one method of helping to address the lasting impact of racism in American society. Opponents say race-based admission policies harm students who should be judged on their merits as students alone, with some arguing that Asian American students were disproportionality rejected in favor of White, Black and Hispanic applicants. Chief Justice John Roberts wrote the 6-3 majority opinion, arguing admissions programs at Harvard University and the University of North Carolina violated the Constitution’s equal protection clause. The Association of Catholic Colleges and Universities, which describes itself as the collective voice of U.S. Catholic higher education, said in a statement the high court’s ruling is “more than disappointing as it ignores the more-than-apparent effects of continued racism in our society.” It said the association’s members would “continue to create paths by which those in society who do not have opportunity find it at our institutions.”

WASHINGTON (OSV News) – The U.S. Supreme Court issued a unanimous decision June 29 in favor of a former postal worker who said he was denied a religious accommodation to observe Christian precepts on keeping holy the Lord’s Day by his former employer. The case Groff v. DeJoy concerned Gerald Groff, an evangelical Christian and former U.S. Postal Service worker, who was denied an accommodation to observe his Sunday Sabbath by not taking Sunday shifts resulting in the loss of his job. The Supreme Court found that federal law requires workplaces to make appropriate accommodations for their employees religious practices unless those practices cannot be “reasonably” accommodated without “undue hardship.” The court’s 1977 precedent in Trans World Airlines v. Hardison found that the “undue hardship” standard is met even at a minimal cost. But in Groff v. DeJoy, the court threw out that standard and ruled that an employer denying religious accommodations must show the burden of granting an accommodation would result in substantial increased costs. “Faced with an accommodation request like Groff’s, an employer must do more than conclude that forcing other employees to work overtime would constitute an undue hardship. Consideration of other options would also be necessary,” Justice Samuel Alito wrote in his majority opinion. The Supreme Court’s ruling sends Groff’s case back to the lower court for reconsideration. photo/CNS

—OSV

U.S. postal workers load their trucks as they begin their day in Carlsbad, Calif., Aug.17, 2020. The U.S. Supreme Court ruled unanimously June 29, 2023, in favor of a former postal worker who said that he was denied a religious accommodation to observe his Sunday Sabbath by not taking Sunday shifts that resulted in the loss of his job. —OSV News photo/Mike Blake, Reuters

This article is from: