by doomwyte
#1 Oct. 8, 2015
Mad and Unruly
radical literature for radical readers
Thoughts on Green Anarchy
There are conflicting definitions and views of green anarchy out there. Some confuse it with primitivism, the belief that science and technology should be abolished. Below, I give a brief introduction to what I have found that green anarchy means to me. As written in “What is Green Anarchy?” by anonymous, “We understand and celebrate the need to keep our visions and strategies open, and always welcome discussion. We feel that every aspect of what we think and who we are constantly needs to be challenged and remain flexible if we are to grow. We are not interested in developing a new ideology, nor perpetuating a singular world-view.” There is no one right answer. Question everything, and keep learning! So what exactly is “green anarchy” anyway? To start with, it stems from the concept of social anarchy, or a more general anarchy. Corin Bruce defines this as, “the view that all
social hierarchy should be abolished.” Bruce further defines green anarchy as, “the view that all hierarchy should be abolished.” The key word that is missing in the second definition is “social.” Green anarchy reaches beyond dismantling hierarchical human relations and seeks to include members of other species in our quest for equality. I believe that it should be clarified early on that no one here is suggesting we intrude on hierarchies outside of our sphere of influence. Instead, we should seek to unravel hierarchies that are a consequence of human activity. This form of anarchy easily fits in to the concept of “total liberation.” This is the belief that the struggle for all types of liberation should be united. Consequently, in addition to the fights against sexism, racism, homophobia, and so on, there are two new additions named by Bruce. These are speciesism and environmental domination.
Speciesism? Some roll their eyes and laugh at this term. Even activists have compared this term to such things as “inbuilt racism.” To each their own, I say, but in my own opinion, there is nothing inertly racist about believing that there is a bias against other