Vol.1 ● No.2 ● 2012
1
Scientific Research Journal of India
Index
Editorial Growth in Cerebral Palsy Children between 3-13 years in Urban Dharwad, India Correlation of Balance Tests Scores With Modified Physical Performance Test In Indian Community-Dwelling Older Adults Safety Positions for Healthy Sex Following Back Pain
3
Dr. Parismita Bordoloi Parmar Sanjay T,
5
Nayana A. Khobre
Sunita Yadav,
Physiotherapy
Deepti Dhar
31
B.Arun
Reduced Instruction Set Computer (RISC)
Thanigaivel.V,
32bit Processor on Field Programmable
V. Subramanian,
Gate Arrays (FPGAs) Implementation
K. Priyadharsan
12
Computer Science
36
http://www.srji.co.cc
Vol.1 ● No.2 ● 2012
Scientific Research Journal of India
2
This page is intentionally left blank
http://www.srji.co.cc
Vol.1 ● No.2 ● 2012
3
Scientific Research Journal of India
Editorial Dear Readers, I am very pleased to present the second issue of the Scientific Research Journal of India (SRJI). This multidisciplinary and open access Journal of science is the official organ of Dr. L. Sharma Medical Care and Educational Development Society. The previous issue had covered three disciplines of science Agriculture, Anthropology and Physiotherapy. In this current issue we are covering two branches of science- Physiotherapy and Computer Science with total 4 papers. I would like to mention that this journal is intended to publish selected original research articles, reviews, short communications and book reviews etc. in the various fields of science like Botany, Zoology, Medical Sciences, Agricultural Sciences, Environmental Sciences, Natural Sciences, Anthropology and any other branch of related sciences and we’ll be more than happy to recognize any of your works in these field too. Wish you a happy reading.
Regards, Dr. Popiha Pordoloi. Ph.D. Email: popiha@gmail.com
http://www.srji.co.cc
Vol.1 ● No.2 ● 2012
Scientific Research Journal of India
4
This page is intentionally left blank
http://www.srji.co.cc
Vol.1 ● No.2 ● 2012
5
Scientific Research Journal of India
Growth in Cerebral Palsy Children between 3-13 years in Urban Dharwad, India Parmar Sanjay T.*. MPT (Paediatrics). Nayana A. Khobre**. MPT (Paediatrics).
Abstract: Background & Objective- Cerebral palsy is defined as a group of non-progressive disorders of movement or posture due to a defect or lesion of the immature brain. The incidence of cerebral palsy is 2-2.5 cases in every 1000 live births. Cerebral palsy is frequently associated with poor growth and children with cerebral palsy tend to be shorter and lighter than their normal counterparts. Our objective of the study is to find out growth in cerebral palsy children. Method - A sample size of 100 children with cerebral palsy of either gender from 3-13 years were assessed for body mass index, growth of children with cerebral palsy was found out. The outcome measures Child Developmental Care/National Health Center Statistics growth charts (CDC/NHCS). Results - Statistical analysis was done with statistical software (n Master 1.0). Data analysis and results showed no statistical significance growth found in children with cerebral palsy. The study showed that clinically all the children with cerebral palsy had low growth when assessed on CDC/NHCS growth charts. Interpretation and conclusion - The children with cerebral palsy had low growth compared with the other counterparts of same age group.
Key words- Growth, Cerebral Palsy.
INTRODUCTION Cerebral palsy (CP) is defined as
retardation, speech and language and oral-
“umbrella term covering a group of non-
motor problems. The etiology of CP is
progressive, but often changing, motor
very diverse and multi-factorial. The
impairment
causes
syndromes
secondary
to
are
congenital,
genetic,
lesions or anomalies of the brain arising in
inflammatory, infectious, anoxic, traumatic
the early stages of its development”.
and
Cerebral palsy is in variably associated
developing brain may be prenatal, natal or
with many
postnatal1. The incidence of cerebral palsy http://www.srji.co.cc
deficits such
as mental
metabolic.
The
injury
to
the
Vol.1 â—? No.2 â—? 2012
6
Scientific Research Journal of India
is 2-2.5 cases in every 1000 live births.
the incidence of malnutrition in children
There are an estimated 4-5 million children
with cerebral palsy6.
and people in India with cerebral palsy2.
A study done on incidence of
The incidence of malnutrition in
malnutrition in children with cerebral
individuals with cerebral palsy is a
palsy tells about feeding problem are
combination of factors, which directly or
usually complicated by the lack of
indirectly result in reduced food and
awareness of parents of incidence of
nutrient intake3. Feeding problems are not
malnutrition in cerebral palsy children.
easily recognizable in children and in order
The main reasons for lack of awareness in
to optimally utilize the impaired feeding
parents were illiteracy, misconception
potential
about
in
these
identification
of
children, incidence
the
disease
and
associated
of
complications in cerebral palsy. The
malnutrition in individuals with cerebral
psychological impact of having child with
palsy is necessary. It also requires regular
severe chronic neurological disease is so
assessment of feeding and nutritional
deep that parents do not appreciate the
status
feeding problems to the extent they should.
and
the
early
appropriate
nutritional
4
rehabilitation .
The study done on Growth and
While the prevalence of growth disorders
among
these
children
nutrition disorders is common secondary
is
health conditions in children with cerebral
unknown, certain observations have been
palsy (CP). Poor growth and malnutrition
made. Growth failure has been related to
in CP merit study because of their impact
the type of cp-spastic or athetoid and to
on health, including psychological and
topographical distribution, and oral-motor
physiological
dysfunction also has been associated with
utilization, societal participation, motor
5
poorer growth
A study done on percent body fat,
function,
healthcare
function, and survival. Understanding the etiology of poor growth has led to a variety
muscle area and oral motor functions are
of
important factors for weight gain and
Increased recognition and understanding of
linear growth of children with cerebral
neurological,
palsy. The identification of the nutritional
environmental factors have begun to shape
problem has a great potential to help
care for children with CP, as well. The
improve weight, muscle mass, decrease
investigation of these factors relies on
irritability and circulation in order to halt
advances made in the assessment methods
interventions
available
to
to
improve
endocrinal,
address
the
growth. and
challenges
http://www.srji.co.cc
Vol.1 â—? No.2 â—? 2012
7
Scientific Research Journal of India
inherent in measuring growth in children
Children diagnosed with cerebral
with CP. Descriptive growth charts and
palsy were assessed for BMI by taking the
norms of
height and weight of the children. The
body composition
provide
information that may help clinicians to
child
interpret growth and intervene to improve
Stediometer with the consideration of
growth and nutrition in children with CP.
physical disabilities to measure the height
Linking growth to measures of health will
and Weight was measured by making the
be necessary to develop growth standards
children stand on weighing machine.
for children with CP in order to optimize health and well-being.
was
made
The
to
outcome
stand
on
measures
the
was
CDC/NHCS growth charts. The growth was assessed by height in meters and weight in kilograms and BMI (Body Mass
METHOD A sample size of 100 children with
Index) is calculated in weight (in kgs) by
cerebral palsy with either gender from 3-
height square (in meters). And BMI
13 years of age was assessed for body
percentiles were calculated on CDC/NHCS
mass index. The study was conducted for 1
growth charts.
year in Physiotherapy OPD of SDM medical
hospital
Dharwad
Karnataka
DATA ANALYSIS Statistical analysis was done with
India. Ethical clearance is obtained from the Institutional Ethical Committee, Shri
statistical
software
(n
Master
1.0).
Dharmasthala Manjunatheshwara College
descriptive analysis was carried out using
of Medical Sciences and Hospital, prior to
mean and standard deviation of mean age,
the commencement of the study. The
height, weight, BMI, BMI percentile.
children included in the study were
Comparison between variables is done
diagnosed cerebral palsy cases, who were
using unpaired t-test. The p-value is
able to stand on stadiometer and weighing
0.5693 which shows that there is no
machine. Children who were un-conscious,
significant difference between boys and
unco-operative, who were not able to stand
girls.
and unstable Patients were excluded. Parents of the subjects willing to
RESULTS
participate were briefed about the study
The table1 depicts the distribution
and how the study would help their
of study subjects according to gender and
children.A written consent was obtained
different types of cerebral palsy children.
from the parents of the children.
It shows mainly spastic cerebral palsy http://www.srji.co.cc
Vol.1 â—? No.2 â—? 2012
8
Scientific Research Journal of India
cases more in the present study which
than girls which was not significant. The
includes 3-13years of age group. The table
table 5 depicts the children in our study are
2 depicts the mean and standard deviation
underweight with 86%.
age of both boys and girls.
The table 6 shows that comparison
The table 3, 4, 5 depicts that the
of boys and girl children with respect to
mean and standard deviation (SD) values
BMI scores by t-test with mean and
of height, weight, BMI and BMI percentile
standard deviation where there was no
for different diagnosis of cerebral palsy in
significant difference between boys and
which dystonic and diplegic type have less
girls.
mean values. And by different age groups of 3-5years, 6-8 years, 9-11 years, and 12+ years have increasing mean values as per the age increases. The mean values of height, weight and BMI is less in boys
ILLUSTRATIONS FOR DIFFERENT POSITIONS Table 1: Distribution of study subjects according to gender by different diagnosis Diagnosis Boys % Girls % Total Ataxic CP 5 71.43 2 28.57 7 Dystonic CP 5 83.33 1 16.67 6 Hemiplegic CP 11 64.71 6 35.29 17 Hypotonic CP 6 100.00 0 0.00 6 Diplegic CP 17 60.71 11 39.29 28 Quadri CP 21 80.77 5 19.23 26 Triplegic CP 8 80.00 2 20.00 10 Total 73 73.00 27 27.00 100 The above table depicts Distribution of study subjects according to gender by different diagnosis Table2: Mean and SD total oral motor scores and its dimensions by diagnosis BMI BMI% Means Std.Dev. Means Diagnosis Ataxic CP 18.1857 4.9878 63.8571 Dystonic CP 14.3333 3.2629 35.1667 Hemiplegic CP 15.5706 2.0784 41.0000 Hypotonic CP 16.0500 4.2646 42.1667 Diplegic CP 15.5429 3.0375 30.5357 Quadri CP 16.7615 4.2477 48.6154 Triplegic CP 17.3800 2.8197 65.5000 All Grps 16.1910 3.5160 43.8200
Std.Dev. 36.0159 47.2035 34.6717 46.2100 35.6282 39.3732 32.2154 38.2515
http://www.srji.co.cc
Vol.1 â—? No.2 â—? 2012
9
Scientific Research Journal of India
Table 3: Mean and SD total oral motor scores and its dimensions by diagnosis BMI BMI% Diagnosis Means Std.Dev. Means Ataxic CP 18.1857 4.9878 63.8571 Dystonic CP 14.3333 3.2629 35.1667 Hemiplegic CP 15.5706 2.0784 41.0000 Hypotonic CP 16.0500 4.2646 42.1667 Diplegic CP 15.5429 3.0375 30.5357 Quadri CP 16.7615 4.2477 48.6154 Triplegic CP 17.3800 2.8197 65.5000 All Grps 16.1910 3.5160 43.8200
Std.Dev. 36.0159 47.2035 34.6717 46.2100 35.6282 39.3732 32.2154 38.2515
Table 4: Mean and SD of Wt, Ht and BMI by age groups Variables Summary 3-5yrs 6-8yrs 9-11yrs 12+yrs Height Means 97.0000 115.7500 130.1481 145.1250 Std.Dev. 10.1612 7.6031 10.5492 7.0887 Weight Means 13.2120 21.5031 28.5185 41.5563 Std.Dev. 3.2447 5.2859 8.3176 12.2666 BMI Means 13.7760 16.1719 16.5222 19.4438 Std.Dev. 2.0765 3.0619 2.6963 4.6381 The above table depicts Mean and SD of Wt, Ht and BMI by age groups
Total 119.6500 18.6917 24.5330 11.7800 16.1910 3.5160
Table 5: Distribution of samples by BMI category and gender BMI Male % Female % Total Under weight 61 70.93 25 29.07 86 Normal 9 90.00 1 10.00 10 Over weight 3 75.00 1 25.00 4 Total 73 73.00 27 27.00 100 The above depicts that Distribution of samples by BMI category and gender
% 86.00 10.00 4.00 100.00
DISCUSSION In our study the mean age group of boys population is 7.794 and of girls
children more in 9-11yrs group mean value was more as comparative to other groups.
population is 8.266 out of the total score
The mean values in the different
which showed the mean value more in age
variable of our study show different mean
group of 9-11years in total score which
values of each type of cerebral palsy
depicts there is no significant difference in
relatively
BMI in both male and female population.
having lower mean as compared to others
As in 9-11yrs age group 30 children were
due to smaller sample size in them for
there and in 12+yrs age group were 15
which no statistical analysis was been
children may be because of number of
carried out.
quadriplegic
and
hypotonic
http://www.srji.co.cc
Vol.1 â—? No.2 â—? 2012 Studies
10
Scientific Research Journal of India
have
documented
that
hemiplegic, support the hypothesis that
growth patterns for patients with cerebral
non-nutritional factors play a significant
palsy (CP) are different from those in the
role in reducing growth in children with
general population. Patients with CP have
CP.
below average weight, linear growth, and
A study done on Identification of
muscle mass and fat stores compared with
malnutrition in children with cerebral
their peers in the general population. Bone
palsy: poor performance of weight-for-
mass density is also reduced, especially
height
among patients who are non-ambulatory
undernourished children with CP have
Poor growth in children with CP
percentiles
changes
in
where
body
explained,
composition
and
may be related to nutritional factors,
proportion
compared
physical factors or factors related to the
developing
peers.
brain lesion itself. Nutritional factors
increased
include
intake,
depleted fat stores, minimally depleted
secondary to impaired oral motor and
muscle stores, severe short stature, and
swallowing
decreased bone density.
inadequate
dietary
competence
and
poor
with
Alterations
normally include
total body water, severely
nutritional status and may impact directly on growth. Physical factors result in decreased mechanical stress on bones due to immobility or lack of weight bearing.
CONCLUSION All the children with cerebral palsy had lower growth than other peer groups,
have
when they were assessed on CDC/NHCS
suggested that immobilization decreases
growth charts, which may be due to oral
bone formation and longitudinal bone
motor dysfunction and other factors such
growth and increases bone resorption,
as neurological factors and the further
which
growth-
studies can be carried out by considering
stimulating hormones. Factors related to
different types of cerebral palsy with
the brain lesion itself may impact on
various other scales and their growth
growth either directly (via a negative
pattern to find out what oral motor
neurotrophic effect on linear growth) or
dysfunction has effect on growth.
Bone
growth
suppresses
studies
certain
indirectly (via the endocrine system). Growth differences between impaired and unimpaired
limbs
in
children
with
References http://www.srji.co.cc
Vol.1 â—? No.2 â—? 2012 1. Bax
11
Scientific Research Journal of India
MCO.
Terminology
and
5. Kuczmarski R J, Ogdan C L et al.
classification of cerebral palsy.
Advance Data CDC Growth Chart:
Dev Med Child Neurol. 1964; 39;
United
295-297.
December4, 2000 (Revised). U.S
2. Chitra Sankar, Nandini Mundkar. Cerebral
Palsy-
Definition,
State,
Number
314
Department of Health and Human Services,
Centers
for
Disease
Classification, Etiology, and Early
Control and Prevention/ National
Diagnosis. Indian J Pediatr .2005;
Center for Health Statistics.
72 (10) : 865-868. 3. Bell
et
al.
longitudinal
6. Incidence A
study
of
malnutrition
in
prospective,
individuals with cerebral palsy.
of
Available
growth,
from:
http.//
nutrition and sedentary behavior in
www.cerebralpalsysource.com/mal
young children with cerebral palsy.
nutrition/index.html
BMC Public Health 2010, 10:176. 4. Bruce K. Shapiro, Pauline Green, Jackie
Krick,
Darlene
Allen,
7. Okeke
IB,
Ojinnaka
Nutritional status of children with cerebral palsy in enugu Nigeria.
Arnold J. Capute. Growth of
European
severely
research 2010; 39: 505-513.
impaired
children:
verse
nutritional
neurological factors.
Dev
Med
NC.
journal
of
scientific
Child
Neurol.1986, 28, 729-733.
CORRESPONDENCE *Assistant Prof, SDM College of Physiotherapy Dharwad India. **Post graduate student, SDM College of Physiotherapy, Dharwad India.
http://www.srji.co.cc
Vol.1 ● No.2 ● 2012
12
Scientific Research Journal of India
Correlation of Balance Tests Scores with Modified Physical Performance Test in Indian Community-Dwelling Older Adults Sunita Yadav* MPT (Neuro), Deepti Dhar** MPT (Paediatrics)
Abstract: Background and Objective: There is sufficient evidence which shows significant relationship between balance tests and other functional tests but there is lack of literature regarding the relationship between balance tests (BBS, MDRT, BPOMA) and Modified Physical Performance Test in different age groups of older adults. Design: An Observational Study Subjects: 58 subjects were divided into three different age groups, having the mean age of 65.3±3.0 (Group-A), 73.7±2.4 (Group-B), 82.6±1.4 (Group-C), mean height of 161.4±5.6 (Group-A), 164.9±10.2 (Group-B), 160.3±5.9 (Group-C) & mean weight of 68.4±4.8 (GroupA), 72.7±6.9 (Group-B), 63.6±7.7 (Group-C) were recruited in this study from old age home and local community. Methods: Subjects in each group performed the tests in the following sequence: BBS (Berg Balance Scale), MDRT (Multi-Directional Reach Test), Modified-PPT (Physical Performance Test) & BPOMA (Balance Performance-Oriented Mobility Assessment of Tinetti) with rest period of 5-10 minutes between each scale. Result: The results suggested that there was a significant positive correlation between balance tests and Modified Physical Performance Test in different age groups of older adults. Conclusion: The current study concluded that Modified physical performance test is a efficient tool to assess static and dynamic balance and also physical function and ambulation in different age groups of older adults. It was also observed that out of these balance tests used in the study, MDRT was the most difficult to understand and perform by subjects above 70 years and the subjects above 80 years found it really hard to understand the procedure. Keywords: BBS, MDRT, BPOMA, Modified PPT, Balance, Physical Function.
INTRODUCTION The number of persons above the
people at or over the age of 60,
age of 60 years is fast growing, especially
constituting
above
7.7%
in India. India is the second most populous
population.
country in the world has 76.6 million
important cause of morbidity and mortality
Recurrent
falls
of are
total an
http://www.srji.co.cc
Vol.1 â—? No.2 â—? 2012
13
Scientific Research Journal of India
in the elderly and are a marker of poor 2
physical and cognitive status.
their likelihood of falls and to enhance physical function.
Impaired balance and physical
The Berg Balance Scale was
function are the main causes of fall among
developed by Kathy Berg (a Canadian
the older adults. Stability and orientation
physical therapist) in1993, as a means of
are to distinct goals of the postural control
measuring balance in the elderly.
system. Postural control for stability and
Multi-directional
Reach
Test
orientation requires both perception and
(MDRT) is developed by Roberta A.
action. Thus, postural control requires the
Newton in 2001. It allows for analysis of
complex
the patient voluntary postural control.
interaction
of
neural
and
4
musculoskeletal systems.
The
Performance
Oriented
Several researchers show that as
Mobility Assessment (POMA) scale was
the age increases, the changes in the neural
originally developed by Dr. Mary E.
and musculoskeletal systems disturb the
Tinetti and first published in 1986, is a
balance and physical activities.6 As age
widely used tool for assessing mobility
increases
and
and fall risk in older people. In this study
physical function also decreases due to
balance subscale of Tinetti assessment is
11
used to assess the balance of older adults.15
the
physical activities
decreased muscular power and strength.
Both balance problems and physical
Brown,
Sinacore,
developed
adults. Therefore the assessment of both
performance test in 2005 to provide more
balance and physical function is necessary
focus
for older adults in order to help establish
substituting a chair rise task and a balance
appropriate
increase
task for the writing and stimulated eating
assign
tasks described in the original PPT. The
awareness appropriate
treatment of
fall
goals, risk
assistive
and
function
by
tool was more useful in identifying deficits
decrease the disability. Several such
in physical function than the self- report
instrument
satisfactory
comparison measure, the functional status
reliability and validity in identifying older
questionnaire. The authors concluded that
people
physical
the performance based measure could
functional problems, discriminating older
assist in early identification of minor
adults by their needs for different assistive
problems in physical functioning, and
device to maintain balance or predicting
allow for opportunity for early intervention
with
shown
balance
and
and
motor
physical
to
have
device
gross
modified
D.R.
inactivity affect the quality of life of older
on
the
M,
for the patients.16 http://www.srji.co.cc
Vol.1 â—? No.2 â—? 2012 Several
14
Scientific Research Journal of India
researchers
found that
Ability to walk at least 50 feet before
physical
sitting to rest; Minimal use of rail or cane
function and previous studies also found
while climbing. Exclusion Criteria: Use
significant correlation between balance
of any assistive prosthetic device; History
scales and other functional tests.17,18,13,19
of any cardiac problem confirmed by
Therefore it is clear that there is a
physician; Any history of fainting spells or
relationship between balance and physical
extended
function.
reasons History of neurological; vestibular
balancing
exercises
improve
dizziness
due
to
unknown
Yet there is no study to show
or auditory deficit confirmed by physician;
relationship between these scales or tests
History of any visual disorder which will
in different age groups. Therefore the main
not be corrected by optical glasses as
purpose of my study is to find out the
confirmed by physician; MMSE score
relationship between balance tests and
below 23; History of postural hypotension;
Modified
test.
History of recent fractures and severe
Second purpose is, the Modified physical
arthritic conditions; History of any major
performance test assesses both balance and
surgeries during last 6 month; History of
physical function in older adults no other
any previous balance training; Moderate to
tool is required because it measure the
severe hypertensions
physical
performance
both static and dynamic balance and also physical function. It tells about fall risk,
Measurement Tools
need of assistance device and functional
Berg Balance Scale (BBS)
limitations; additionally it takes less time
The BBS was developed to measure
to administer as compared to other scale.
balance
among
impairment
in
older balance
people
with
function
by
assessing the performance of 14 functional
METHODOLOGY This observational study recruited
tasks. The results are based on how long it
58 subjects from old age homes and local
takes to complete specific tasks and how
community
Dehradun
well the tasks are performed. Each task is
meeting the inclusion criteria. Inclusion
measured on a five point ordinal scale
Criteria: Age - 60 to 89 year old healthy
ranging from 0 to 4 (0 = unable to
subjects; Gender- Both male and female;
perform, 4 = independent) so that the
Ability to abduct and flex the shoulder up
aggregate score ranges from 0 to 56.
to 90 degrees; Ability to stand for
Multidirectional Reach Test (MDRT)
of
Delhi
and
minimum 10 min. without any assistance; http://www.srji.co.cc
Vol.1 â—? No.2 â—? 2012
15
Scientific Research Journal of India
The MDRT is an inexpensive, reliable and
Procedure
valid screening tool to measure the limits
The subjects were recruited based on
of postural stability in four directions
inclusion
(forward, backward, right & left) during
subjects of different age groups 60 to 69
standing. The distance of each reach is
years of age (Group- A), 70 to 79 years of
measured in centimetres or inches.
age (Group- B), and 80 to 89 years of age
Balance Performance Oriented Mobility
(Group- C). Subjects in each group
Assessment (BPOMA)
performed the tests in a sequence i.e. BBS,
The Tinetti assessment is a physical task-
MDRT, Modified-PPT, POMA. The whole
oriented scale which measures the gait and
procedure was explained to each subject
balance activities of older adults. In this
and the subject signed a consent form
study BPOMA was used to assess the
before performing the study. Description
balance of the community dwelling older
data was collected which included age,
adults; it consists 9 tasks. 6 tasks are
gender, height, weight and number of falls
measured on a three point ordinal scale
in the past 6 months. MMSE score was
ranging from 0 to 2 and remaining three
also assessed. All subjects were assessed
tasks are measured on a two point ordinal
by all four scales or tests in the following
scale ranging from 0 to 1 ( 0 = unable to
order BBS, MDRT, Modified-PPT and
perform, 1 & 2 = independent). The
BPOMA. All components of each scale
maximum score is 16.
were demonstrated to all the subjects and
Physical Performance Test (Modified-
one practice session was done for all the
PPT)
components of four scales by all the
An objective evaluation of overall physical
subjects, after that reading was taken. Each
function was obtained by using modified
test or scale was administered by myself.
PPT. The severity of physical frailty in
All subjects were offered rest breaks and
physical functioning was assessed using a
water during the session and completed the
modified PPT. It consists of 9 tasks; each
approximately 60 minute testing protocol
task is measured on a five point ordinal
without
scale ranging from 0 to 4 ( 0 = unable to
discomfort. The resting period of 5 to 10
perform, 4 = independent) except 7th task
minute was given after performing each
(turning 360 degrees) which ranges from 0
scale. As a precautionary measure, blood
to 1 (0 = unsteady, 1 = steady). The
pressure was checked prior to beginning of
maximum score is 36.
the test session and it was again taken at
and
exclusion
complaint
of
criteria
fatigue
the
or
the end of the last test performed. One http://www.srji.co.cc
Vol.1 ● No.2 ● 2012
16
Scientific Research Journal of India
person was always nearby vicinity of the
1] was calculated. The mean and standard
subject.
deviation of balance tests and physical Data Analysis
performance test (modified) of Group – A
The data analysis was done on SPSS 11.5
[Table 2], Group – B [Table 3], & Group –
software. The arithmetical mean and
C
standard deviation of age, height and
correlation values of balance tests with
weight
were
modified physical performance test of
evaluated. Karl pearson’s correlation test
Group – A [Table 5], Group – B [Table 6],
was done to analyse the correlation
& Group – C [Table 7], were calculated.
between balance tests (BBS, MDRT &
Karl pearson’s correlation test was used to
POMA) with physical performance test
find out the correlation between BBS,
(modified)
people.
MDRT & BPOMA with PPT (modified) in
Statistical significance level was set at <
different age groups of older adults, Group
0.05. The data analysis was done on SPSS
– A (60 – 69 years of age), Group – B (70
11.5 software. The arithmetical mean and
– 79 years of age), and Group – C (80 - 89
standard deviation of age, height and
years of age); these three groups showed
weight
were
significant positive correlation between
evaluated. Karl pearson’s correlation test
balance tests (BBS, MDRT & BPOMA)
was done to analyse the correlation
with physical performance test (modified).
in
in
demographic
among
data
elderly
demographic
data
[Table
4],
was
calculated.
The
between balance tests (BBS, MDRT & POMA) with physical performance test (modified)
among
elderly
people.
Table 1: Mean and standard deviation of demographic data
Statistical significance level was set at < 0.05.
RESULT AND INTERPRETATION
Group – A Age Height Weight
N 20 20 20
Age Height Weight
N 20 20 20
Group – B
A sample of 58 subjects were selected on the basis of inclusion and exclusion criteria. Each group of older adults had 20 subjects except Group – C (81-89 years of age) which has only 18 subjects due to unavailability of the subjects. The mean and standard deviation of age weight and height of three Groups A, B and C [Table
Mean 65.3±3.0 161.4±5.6 68.4±4.8
Mean 73.7±2.4 164.9±10.2 72.7±6.9
Group – C N Mean Age 20 82.6±1.4 Height 20 160.3±5.9 Weight 20 63.6±7.7 Table 1 shows mean and standard deviation of demographic data of different age groups. Group –
http://www.srji.co.cc
Vol.1 ● No.2 ● 2012
(60 – 69 years of age), Group –B (70 – 79 years of age) & Group – C ( 80 – 89 years of age).
Table 2: (Group – A) Mean and standard deviation (SD) of balance tests (BBS, MDRT & BPOMA) and Physical Performance Test (Modified). Tests BBS FR (MDRT) BR (MDRT) RR (MDRT) LR (MDRT) BPOMA PPT (modified)
N 20 20 20 20 20 20 20
Table 3: (Group – B) Mean and standard deviation (SD) of balance tests (BBS, MDRT & BPOMA) and Physical Performance Test (Modified). N 20 20 20 20 20 20 20
Mean and SD 27.7±5.3 12.0±3.4 9.9±3.9 11.2±3.3 11.4±4.3 12.9±2.2 27.7±5.3
Table 3 shows mean and standard deviation of balance tests and physical performance test (modified) of Group-A (70-79 Years of age).
Table 4: (Group – C) Mean and standard deviation (SD) of balance tests (BBS, MDRT & BPOMA) and Physical Performance Test (Modified). Tests BBS FR (MDRT) BR (MDRT) RR (MDRT) LR (MDRT) BPOMA PPT (modified)
N 20 20 20 20 20 20 20
Figure 1: Mean and standard deviation of balance tests (BBS, MDRT, & BPOMA) with modified physical performance test (modified) of Group A, B and C.
Mean and SD 54±2.4 13.6±2.6 11.8±2.6 12.5±2.5 12.2±3.0 14.9±1.9 31.1±2.5
Table 2 shows mean and standard deviation of balance tests and modified physical performance test of Group-A (60-69 Years of age).
Tests BBS FR (MDRT) BR (MDRT) RR (MDRT) LR (MDRT) BPOMA PPT (Modified)
17
Scientific Research Journal of India
Mean and SD 42.6±3.6 5.5±2.2 3.2±1.9 4.9±2.3 4.4±2.2 10.5±1.4 18.0±3.5
Table 4 shows mean and standard deviation of balance tests and Modified physical performance test of Group A (80-89 Years of age).
Table 5: (Group A) Correlations of balance tests (BBS, MDRT, & POMA) with Physical Performance Test (Modified) Balance Tests BBS Vs PPT (modified) FR( MDRT) Vs PPT (modified) BR (MDRT) Vs PPT (modified) RR (MDRT) Vs PPT (modified) LR (MDRT) Vs PPT (modified) BPOMA Vs PPT (modified)
r value .759 .592 .671 .541 .518 .826
P value .000 .006 .001 .014 .019 .000
Table 5 shows correlation of balance tests with physical performance test (modified), all the balance tests show significant correlation except right and left reaches which show moderately significant correlations with physical performance test (modified) of Group – A (60 – 69 years of age).
Figure 2: Correlation Graph of Berg Balance Scale (BBS) and Physical Performance Test (Modified) of Group – A.
Figure 2 depicts correlation between BBS and modified PPT. It shows positive significant correlation in 60-69 years of age group i.e. Group – A.
http://www.srji.co.cc
Vol.1 ● No.2 ● 2012
18
Scientific Research Journal of India
Figure 3: Correlation Graph Of Forward Reach (FR) of MDRT and Physical Performance Test (Modified) Of Group – A.
Figure 3 depicts correlation between FR of MDRT and PPT (modified). It shows positive significant correlation in 60-69 years of age group i.e. Group – A.
Figure 4: Correlation Graph of Backward Reach (BR) of MDRT and Physical Performance Test (Modified) Of Group – A.
Figure 4 depicts correlation between BR of MDRT and PPT (modified). It shows positive significant correlation in 60-69 years of age group i.e. Group – A.
Figure 5: Correlation Graph of Right Reach (RR) of MDRT and Physical Performance Test (Modified) of Group A.
Figure 6: Correlation Graph Of Lateral Reach (LR) of MDRT and Physical Performance Test (Modified) of Group – A.
Figure 6 depicts correlation between LR of MDRT and PPT (modified). It shows positive significant correlation in 60-69 years of age group i.e. Group – A.
Figure 7: Correlation Graph of Balance Performance Oriented Mobility Assessment (BPOMA) with Physical Performance Test (Modified) of Group – A.
Figure 7 depicts correlation between BPOMA and Modified PPT (modified). It shows positive significant correlation in 60-69 years of age group i.e. Group – A.
Table 6: Correlations of balance tests (BBS, MDRT, & BPOMA) with Physical Performance Test (modified) of Group - B. Balance Tests
Figure 5 depicts correlation between RR of MDRT and PPT (modified). It shows positive significant correlation in 60-69 years of age group i.e. Group – A.
BBS Vs PPT (modified) FR( MDRT) Vs PPT (modified) BR (MDRT) Vs PPT (modified) RR (MDRT) Vs PPT (modified) LR (MDRT) Vs PPT (modified) BPOMA Vs PPT (modified)
r value .944 .874 .893 .826 .710 .856
P value < .01 < .01 < .01 < .01 < .01 < .01
Table 6 shows significant correlation between balance tests (BBS, MDRT & BPOMA) and
http://www.srji.co.cc
Vol.1 ● No.2 ● 2012
Scientific Research Journal of India
modified physical performance test in older adults [Group – B (70 – 79 years of age)].
Figure 8: Correlation graph of Berg Balance Test (BBS) with Physical Performance Test (Modified) Of Group – B.
Figure 8 depicts correlation between BBS and PPT (modified). It shows positive significant correlation in 70-79 years of age group i.e. Group – B.
Figure 9: Correlation graph of Forward Reach of MDRT with Physical Performance Test (Modified) of Group B.
Figure 9 depicts correlation between FR of MDRT and PPT (modified). It shows positive significant correlation in 70-79 years of age group i.e. Group – B.
Figure 10: Correlation graph of Backward Reach (BR) of MDRT with Physical Performance Test (Modified) Of Group – B.
19
Figure 10 depicts correlation between BR of MDRT and PPT (modified). It shows positive significant correlation in 70-79 years of age group i.e. Group – B.
Figure 11: Correlation graph of Right Reach (RR) of MDRT with Physical Performance Test (Modified) of Group B.
Figure 11 depicts correlation between RR of MDRT and PPT (modified). It shows positive significant correlation in 70-79 years of age group i.e. Group – B.
Figure 12: Correlation graph of Left Reach (LR) of MDRT with Physical Performance Test (Modified) Of Group B.
Figure 12 depicts correlation between LR of MDRT and PPT (modified). It shows positive significant correlation in 70-79 years of age group i.e. Group – B.
Figure 13: Correlation graph of Balance Performance Oriented Mobility Assessment (BPOMA) with Physical Performance Test (Modified) Of Group B.
http://www.srji.co.cc
Vol.1 ● No.2 ● 2012
Scientific Research Journal of India
20
Figure 13 depicts correlation between POMA and PPT (modified). It shows positive significant correlation in 71-79 years of age group i.e. Group – B
Figure 15 depicts correlation between FR of MDRT and PPT (modified). It shows positive significant correlation in 81-89 years of age group i.e. Group – C.
Table 7: Correlations of balance tests (BBS, MDRT, & BPOMA) with Physical Performance Test (Modified) – Group-C.
Figure 16: Correlation graph of Backward Reach (BR) of MDRT with Physical Performance Test (Modified) of Group C.
Balance Tests
r P value value BBS Vs PPT (modified) .789 < .01 FR( MDRT) Vs PPT (modified) .822 < .01 BR (MDRT) Vs PPT (modified) .852 < .01 RR (MDRT) Vs PPT (modified) .770 < .01 LR (MDRT) Vs PPT (modified) .752 < .01 B POMA Vs PPT (modified) .651 < .01 Table 7: also shows significant correlation between balance tests ( BBS, MDRT & BPOMA) and physical performance test (modified) in older adults [Group – C ( 80 – 89 years of age)].
Figure 14: Correlation graph of Berg Balance Scale (BBS) with Physical Performance Test (Modified ) Of Group C.
Figure 14 depicts correlation between BBS and PPT (modified). It shows positive significant correlation in 81-89 years of age group i.e. Group – C.
Figure 15: Correlation graph Of Forward Reach (FR) of MDRT with Physical Performance Test (Modified) Of Group C.
Figure 16 depicts correlation between BR of MDRT and PPT. It shows positive significant correlation in 81-89 years of age group i.e. Group – C.
Figure 17: Correlation graph of Right Reach (RR) of MDRT with Physical Performance Test (Modified) of Group C.
Figure 17 depicts correlation between RR of MDRT and PPT (modified). It shows positive significant correlation in 81-89 years of age group i.e. Group – C.
Figure 18: Correlation graph of Left Reach (LR) of MDRT with Physical Performance Test (Modified) of Group – C.
http://www.srji.co.cc
Vol.1 ● No.2 ● 2012
21
Scientific Research Journal of India
Figure 18 depicts correlation between LR of MDRT and PPT (modified). It shows positive significant correlation in 81-89 years of age group i.e. Group – C.
the functional decline. Balance instability
Figure 19: Correlation graph of Balance Performance Oriented Mobility Assessment (BPOMA) with Physical Performance Test (Modified) of Group – C.
(activities of daily living). Therefore,
and physical inactivity in older adults contribute to this decline in ADLs effective
balance
and
functional
assessments are needed to document balance and functional abilities and in this segment of the older adult population. This information is critical to the design of all prevention/reduction
programs
and
to
maintain or improve the quality of life for these individuals.25 The BBS, MDRT, & BPOMA have Figure 19 depicts correlation between BPOMA and PPT (modified). It shows positive significant correlation in 81-89 years of age group i.e. Group – C.
documented validity and reliability to
DISCUSSION
also documented validity and reliability to
assess balance abilities. As well as physical performance test (modified) has
Assessing balance and physical
assess functional abilities in community
abilities as they relate to falls in older
dwelling older adults. Previous researchers
adults is complex due to many social and
found significant relationship between
health related issues that may be involved.
balance scales (BBS, MDRT & BPOMA)
The geriatric population above 80 years
with other functional performance tests;
adults
complicated
Barthel mobility subscale, Time up and go
situation due to a sedentary life style, a
Test and Physical Performance Test
lower level of function, and the dynamics
respectively 13, 25, 26. But there is little to no
of
emotional
documentation of relationship between
environments. Any one or combination of
three balance scales with PPT (modified).
these factors may lead to a falls at any time
Thus this study was done to find out the
because the level of the older adult’s
relationship of these three balance scales
performance may not meet the demands of
with physical performance test (modified).
the environment or task at hand. The need
The clinical trial studied the correlation
to reduce this functional decline is an
between balance tests (BBS, MDRT, &
important health care issue. It is important
BPOMA) and physical performance test
presents
their
a
physical
more
and
to identify those factors that contribute to http://www.srji.co.cc
Vol.1 ● No.2 ● 2012
22
Scientific Research Journal of India
(modified) among elderly people who
number of female subjects are more than
were divided into three age categories.
males so it could be the reason for lowest
Berg Balance Scale (BBS)
values. Another study found mean values
The last two items of the Berg Balance
of BBS in fallers (36.5) and nonfallers
Test are considered the most difficult to
(35.7) older adults;25 these values are very
perform. These tasks are: item no. 13 & 14
low as compared to the current study. The
(stand with feet in tandem for 30 seconds,
reasons could be one that the mean age of
stand on one leg respectively), One study
this study population is 83±8.8 years
found that item numbers 12, 13, & 14 are
which shows very older subjects. Secondly
25
the most difficult tasks to perform, but in
they examined community dwelling older
the current study only 6 subjects (Group B
adults who were home bound and have a
& C) found difficulty to perform the 12th
neurological or musculoskeletal diagnosis
task. All the subjects got grade 4 for the
that may disturb the balance and contribute
1st, 2nd, 3rd, & 4th components of the
to falls . In another study the mean value
BBS. Not one subject reached up to 25cm
of BBS is 48.6 and the mean age of this
for the 8th component (Reaching forward
study is 74.1± 7.9 years which is
with outstretched arm while standing) of
approximately similar to Group-B of the
the BBS.
current study. The mean value of BBS of
In the current study the mean values (54,
the current study is 49.65 which is slightly
49 & 42, as shown in tables 2, 3 & 4) of
more, the reason could be the age
BBS in different age groups are lower
difference because the mean age of the
from the findings (55,55; 53,52; & 52,48
Group-B is 73.70 ± 2.4 which shows that
for male and female respectively) of one
the subjects were mostly between 71 to 75
study in 3 age groups (60-69, 70-79, &
years and the subjects of the above said
34
This difference may be due
study were mostly between 68 to 81 years,
to age difference. They have given the
so this could be the reason for the lowest
average mean of age (69); they did not
value of BBS among 254 community-
mention the mean value of age for
dwelling older adults.13
individual groups so the subjects of the
A study done by Patricia S. Smith found
this study may be slightly younger than my
significant relationship between BBS and
study; in this study the mean values for
forward reach in post acute stroke patients
females in each age group have lower than
(r = 0.78).27 The BBS has also been
males and in the current study the scores of
shown to correlate with both the Tinetti
the tests for the females also lower and the
mobility index (r = 0.91) and the “get up &
80+ years).
http://www.srji.co.cc
Vol.1 ● No.2 ● 2012
23
Scientific Research Journal of India
go test” (r = - 0.76).28 A correlation greater
groups. It also indicates that there is a
than 0.70 between total BBS and total
relationship between age and height with
Fugl-Mayer-Scale (FMS) scores have been
performance on the lateral reach test.
reported in older adults.
18
The above
These results similar to the study who
studies shows correlations between BBS
reported that, similar to functional reach
and other functional tests. This current
performance is positively correlated with
study also shows significant correlation
height and negatively correlated with
between BBS and physical performance
age.22 The four heighted persons were
test (modified), [r = 0.759, P = <0.01
present in the current study, the values of
(Group - A); r = 0.944, P = <0.01 (Group -
all the components of MDRT were greater
B); ); r = 0.789, P = <0.01 (Group - C); as
to these heighted persons as compared to
shown in tables 5, 6, 7 & figures 2, 8, and
other
14 respectively]. The reason of significant
performance of the functional and lateral
correlation between BBS and physical
reach tests in the present study are lower
performance test (modified) could be one
than mean scores reported elsewhere.13,29,
that the five components are similar
30
between BBS and PPT (modified) and
elderly females (age, 70-87 years), a study
secondly both BBS and PPT (modified)
reported a mean functional reach of
assess static and dynamic balance and also
26.7±8.9cm.30 In another research, with a
physical activity.
larger sample of 254 elderly community-
Multi-directional Reach Test (MDRT)
dwelling adults (mean age = 74.1±7.9
In MDRT backward reach is the most
years), It was reported a mean forward,
difficult task to perform because most of
backward, right and left reach tests scores
the subjects of the Group-C used to take a
of 22.6±8.6cm, 11.5±7.8cm,17.5±7.6 &
step behind while performing this reach.
16.8±7.4cm respectively.13 Yet another
MDRT is considered the more time taking
study reported mean left and right lateral
test and most difficult to understand by the
reach test scores of 21.0±2.5cm and
subjects because the mostly older adults
20.0±0.5cm respectively, from 60 healthy
use the spine not the ankle for the reaches.
females over the age of 65 (mean age =
This current study shows there is a
72.5±5.0 years).29 In each of the above
significant
between
mentioned studies scores were defined as
components (FR, BR, RR & LR) of
the mean multiple trials which may reflect
MDRT and physical performance test
score inflation due to learning over
(modified) in older adults of different age
multiple trials. In contrast, scores in
relationship
subjects.
Mean
scores
on
In a sample of 14 community dwelling
http://www.srji.co.cc
Vol.1 ● No.2 ● 2012
24
Scientific Research Journal of India
present study were recorded from a single
as shown in table- 1). Another study found
trial. Additionally, subjects used the ankle
mean value of 13±2.9 among females
movements rather than spine movements
(mean age = 83.8±7.7 years),33 which is
which reflects the negative correlation
more
between age and ankle muscle strength,
(10.5±1.4, as shown in table- 4 ) of Group-
sensation and ability to generate large
C of the current study, in fact mean age
amounts of force at the ankle joint.31
was similar (82.6±1.3 years, as shown in
One of studies in past have revealed that
table- 1 ). The subjects for Group-C were
MDRT demonstrated significant inverse
all
relationships with scores on the time up &
component was more among the subjects
go test (TUG): [FR (r = -0.442) BR (r = -
of the current study while in the above said
0.333), RR (r = - 0.260), LR (r = - 0.310)
study where mean value was 83.8±7.7
which is a functional performance test.13
years, many subjects less than may 80
Similarly current study showed significant
years. Hence the balance scores were
correlation between MDRT and modified
better for them.
physical performance test which is again a
Physical Performance Test (Modified-
functional performance test with high
PPT)
validity and reliability. Hence it can be
In modified physical performance test, the
said
good
Ist & 2nd tasks were considered the most
functional
difficult task to perform by the subjects
that
correlation
MDRT with
also
shows
different
as
above
compared
80
and
to
mean
physical
value
frailty
performance tests.
mainly for the Groups B & C. Seven
Tinetti Balance Subscale
subjects were using the assistive devices
During the performance of this test, the
for the 8th & 9th components (climb one
subjects did not find any difficulty with
flight of stairs and climb stairs) of the
any of the tasks in the balance of
physical performance test (modified) and
performance-oriented mobility assessment
four subjects climbed the stairs by holding
(BPOMA) of Tinetti.
the one sided railing.
One study found a mean among the
In one study it was found that the mean
community dwelling older women with no
value of the PPT (modified) score among
health problems on the balance subset of
27 frail obese older volunteers after
32
12.6±1.7 (mean age = 74.7±6.0 years),
treatment was 29.4±2.2 and for control
which is similar to mean value (12.9±2.1,
group it was 29.8±2.0.34 Mean age was
as shown in table- 3) of Group-B of the
71.1±5.1for
current study (mean age = 73.7±2.4 years,
matched the current age of Group – B but
treatment
group
which
http://www.srji.co.cc
Vol.1 ● No.2 ● 2012
25
Scientific Research Journal of India
the mean value is lower i.e. 27.6±5.2 as
subjects 16 were female. It has been well
shown in table- 3, this difference is may be
established
due to age because in my study the mean
component is affected due to larger body
age for the Group - B is 73.7±2.4, which
mass in the upper segment the of body.
shows that the subjects were slightly older
The age is an important factor that affects
which reflects the negative correlation
both balance and physical function of older
between age and physical function.35 The
adults. Declines in standing balance have
mean age of group-A of current study is
been attributed to sensory, musculoskeletal
65.2±3.0 which is slightly younger than
and cognitive changes, typically in some
the control group (69±4.6) of the above
combination as multiple systems fall
study, therefore the mean value for this
below minimal functional thresholds.36
group of my study is more and second
The results of the balance tests and
reason could be that the subjects were
physical performance test (modified) are
obese which also reflects the negative
different in different age groups of older
correlation between obesity and physical
adults, which proved that the disturbance
function.
35
that
in
females
balance
in balance and physical function also differ
Another study found the mean values of
in severity (mild, moderate and severe for
physical performance test (modified) in
group A, B & C respectively) among
community dwelling older adults. The
different age groups of older adults. Thus
mean values of three groups [obese
assessment and treatment also differ to
elderly, nonobese frail, and nonobese
provide effective evaluation and treatment
nonfrail] were 34.4±0.5, 29.3±0.7 and
in different age groups. Additionally safety
15
27.8±0.8 respectively. The second group
measures are necessary for the Group – C
of above study matched with Group - B of
(80-89 years of age) in the assessment and
the current study in respect similar age,
treatment also to prevent fall.
weight and condition but the mean value of physical performance test (modified) is
CONCLUSION There is a significant relationship between
more than the current study, the reason
balance tests and physical performance test
could be that the subjects of my study may
(modified) and physical performance test
be more frail and reason could be the
(modified) is an efficient tool to assess
larger number of female subject in the
static and dynamic balance and also
current study compared to this study, there
physical function and ambulation in
both genders were in equal proportion
different age groups of older adults. It was
while in the current study out of 20
also observed that out of the these balance http://www.srji.co.cc
Vol.1 â&#x2014;? No.2 â&#x2014;? 2012
26
Scientific Research Journal of India
tests used in the study, MDRT was the
functional level as well as the balance
most difficult to understand and perform
issues in an elderly person rather than
for people above 70 years and subjects
giving other tests which are time taking,
above 80 years found it really hard to
separately for balance and functional
understand the procedure. According to
performance.
this test the subject was supposed to perform movement at the ankle joint but more of trunkal mobility was seen in people above 80 years while performing this test. Hence it can be said that MDRT is not a very feasible test for cheeking balance in subjects above 80 years.
60 years continues to grow, there will be rise in the level of functional disability and health.
imperative methods
that are
It
is
therefore
appropriate
screening
developed
to
identify
community dwelling elderly individuals with functional impairment who should be referred for a detailed physical therapy evaluation. As we have seen that PPT (modified)
incorporates
all
small. The sample size of age Group â&#x20AC;&#x201C; C (81-89 years of age) was relatively smaller as compared to other groups. Gait subscale of
performance
oriented
mobility
assessment is not included in this study.
Clinical significance As the Indian population over the age of
prolonging
Limitations In the present study, the sample size was
important
entities of balance and function hence,
Future Research Future study can be done with larger sample size to see the results. Future research is needed to find out the reliability
and
validity
of
modified
physical performance test with balance scales (PPT, MDRT & BPOMA) in elderly. In my study the value of the left lateral reach is more than right lateral reach for the heighted person. Future study can be done to identify that why this difference has come and this difference is significant or not.
simply administering modified physical performance testing can well define the References 1. Alexander
Kalache,
Bruno
older people: National/Regional
Lunenfold. Health and men ageing.
review of India. Available from:
2001.
http://
Available
from:
www.
Who_nmh_nph_01.2.pdf. 2. Dr.
B.
Krishnaswamy,
www.who.int/ageing/projects/SEA Dr.
RO
Gnanasambandam Usha. Falls in http://www.srji.co.cc
Vol.1 â&#x2014;? No.2 â&#x2014;? 2012
27
Scientific Research Journal of India
3. Christopher
M.
Pathophysiology
of
Fredericks.
limited older adults. J Gerontology.
the
2010;495-502.
motor
systems: principles and clinical
8. Keith smith. Sensory changes:
presentations. F.A. Davis company.
Senior
Philadelphia: Jean-Francois Vilain;
http:// www. Goldenbuckeye.com,
1996. p. 284.
http://senior series.osu.edu.
4. Ann
Shumway-cookjorie
Morjorie control
H.woollacott. theory
and
H., Motor
practical
series.
9. Marjorie
H.
Shumway.
Available
from:
Woolacott,
Cook,
Lewis
Ann M.,
Nashner.
Ageing
and
posture
applications. 2nd ed. Lippincott
control:
changes
in
sensory
Williams and Wilkins: 2001. p.
organization
164-165, 181-182, 222-238.
coordination. The international J of
5. Kathryn H. Schmitz, Ann R. Cappola. The interaction of cancer and aging: Estallishing the need for breast
cancer
rehabilitation.
and
muscular
ageing and human development. 1986;23(2):97-114. 10. H.J.J.(cojanne) kars, B. Eng., Juha
J
M., Hijmans, Jann H.B. Geertzen,
Cancer epidemiol biomarkers prev.
Wiebren Zijlsta. The effect of
2007;16(5):866-72.
reduced
somatosensation
on
6. Jan Janseen, sleven B. Heymsfield,
standing balance: A systematic
Robert Ross. Low relative skeletal
review. J Diabetes Sci Technal.
muscle mass (sarcopenia) in older
2009 July; 3(4): 931-943.
persons
is
associated
with
11. Siobhan M White, Thomas R
functional impairment and physical
Wojcicki,
disability. J American geriatrics
Physical activity and quality of life
society. 2002;50(5):889-896.
in
7. David Kieran
clark, F.
carolynnpattern,
Reid,
Robert
J,
Carobello, Edward M. Phillips, Roger
A.
Feilding.
Edward
community
adults.
J
mcauley.
dwelling
Biomed
central
older ltd.
2009;7:10. 12. Lusardi,
M.M.
Functional
Impaired
performance in community living
voluntary neuromuscular activation
older adults. J Geriatric Phys Ther.
limits muscle power in mobility
2004;26(3):14-22.
http://www.srji.co.cc
Vol.1 ● No.2 ● 2012
28
Scientific Research Journal of India
13. Roberta A. Newton. Validity of multidirectional
a
based exercise program on physical
practical measure for limits of
function in frail older adults. J of
stability
geriatric Phys Ther. 2010 April-
in
reach older
Gerontology
test:
Moseia A. The effects of a home-
adults.
medical
J
sciences.
56A(4);M248-M252. 14. Clinimetric
19. Homjet Tal-Hatu Kolapo, Fashoyin
properties
performance
june;33(2): 78-84.
oriented
of
the
Oyinlola
Funmilayo.
Balance
mobility
retraining in post stroke patients
assessment. J Phys Ther 2006 July
using a simple, effective and
1.
affordable technique reduction De
15. Kathryn D. Mitchell, Roberta A. Newton. mobility
Performance-oriented assessment
(POMA)
L’ equilibre après un accident vasculaire cerebral grace a une technique
simple,
efficace
et
balance scale indicates need for
accessible.
assistive
neurological sciences. 2007; 26(2).
device. 2006;1(3):183-
189.
20. Ganvir
16. Dennis T. Villareal, Marian banks,
J
SD.
functional
American
Assessment
capacity
in
of
elderly
Catheraian Siener, David R. Sina
population by elderly mobility
Core,
scale in wardha. Indian academy of
Samuel
Klein.
Physical
frailty and body composition in obese elderly men and women. J Obesity
A
Research
J.
2004;12:913-920. 17. Angela
Conrad
21. Tm steffen, LA Mollinger. Agegender related test performance in community-dwelling adults. J of
Wooton.
An
integrative review of Tai Chi research: An alternative form of physical
geriatrics. 2008;4:89-97.
to
Phys
Ther.
2005;29(4):181-188. 22. Patricia
S
Smith,
Judith
A
improve
Hombree, Mary E Thompson. Berg
balance and prevent falls in older
balance scale and functional reach:
adults. J Orthopaedic Nursing.
determining the best clinical tool
2010 April; 29(2): 108-116.
for individuals post acute stroke. J
18. Matsuda,
activity
neurological
Patricia
Shumway-Cook,Anne,
Noritake, Ciol,
Clinical
rehablilitation.
2004;18(7):811-818.
http://www.srji.co.cc
Vol.1 ● No.2 ● 2012 23. Berg
K,
29
Scientific Research Journal of India Wood-Dauphinu
S,
Williams J, Gayton D. Measuring balance in the elderly: preliminary
patients.
J
American
Heart
Association. 2002;33:1022. 28. Sabrina E., Trader, Roberta A.
development of an instrument. J
Newton,
Phys Ther association. 2001 sept
Balance abilities of homebound
10.
older adults classified as fallers and
24. Jennifer
S
Brach,
Jessie
M
Vanswearingen, Anne B Newman,
RonitaL.,
Cromwell.
nonfallers. J of geriatric Phys Ther. 26(3):03.
Andrea M Kriska. Identifying early
29. Duncan PW, Weiner DK, Chandler
decline of physical function in
J, Studenskis S. Functional reach: a
community-dwelling older womem
new clinical measure of balance. J
: performance-based and self report
Gerontol Med Sd. 1990;45:M192-
measures. J American Phys Ther
M197.
Association. 2001 Sept 10. 25. Teresa
Steffen,
30. DeWaard B, Bentrup B, Hollman J,
Megan Seney.
Brasseur J. Relationship of the
Test-retest reliability and minimal
functional reach and lateral reach
detectable change on balance and
tests in elderly females. J Geriatr
ambulation tests, the 36-item short
Phys Ther. 2002; 25:4-9
form health survey and the unified
31. Sadashiv Ram Aggarwal, Deepak
Parkinson disease rating scale in
kumar. Lower extremity muscle
people with parkinsonism. J Phys
strength and balance performance
Ther. 2008 june;88(16):733-746.
in
26. Mary Thompson, Ann Medley. Forward functional
and
lateral
reach
in
sitting younger,
middle-aged and older adults. J of geriatric Phys Ther. 30(2):07. Tang,
Ching-Fan
community-dwelling
elderly men aged 50 years and above. Indian J of Phys Ther and occupational therapy. 2007;1(2). 32. Chiara
Mecagni,
Janet
Pullin
Smith, Kay E Roberts, Susan B O’
27. Hui-Fen Mao, Fing Hsueh, FeiFang
Indian
Sheu.
Sullivan. Balance and ankle range of motion in community-dwelling
Analysis and comparison of the
aged
psychometric properties of three
correlational study. J of American
balance
measures
for
64
to
87
years
:
A
stroke
http://www.srji.co.cc
Vol.1 â&#x2014;? No.2 â&#x2014;? 2012
30
Scientific Research Journal of India
Phys Ther Association. 2000 May
Physical
activity
and
30;
dehydroepiandrosterone
sulphate,
insulin-like
growth
1
testosterone
in
33. Dennist , Villareal, Marian Banks, David
R,
Sinacare,
Catherine
healthy
Siener, Sarmuel Klein. Effect of
elderly people. J
weight loss and exercise on frailty
journals. 1998;27:745-751.
in obese older adults. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166:860-866.
and active
Ageing oxford
36. Dr. Sandra Brauer, Y Voner Burns, Prudence Galley. Lateral reach: a
34. Karen W, Hayes, Marjorie E.
clinical measure of medio-lateral
Johnson. Measures of adult general
postural stability. J Phys Ther Res
performance tests. Arthritis care
Int. 1990;4:81-88.
and
research.
2003
Oct
15;49(55):S28-S42. 35. Marc Bonnefoy, Tomasz Kostka, Marie
C. Patricol,
Sophic E,
Bethouze, Brono Mathian et al.
CORRESPONDENCE *Student, Dolphin Institute, Dehradun affiliated to H.N.B Garhwal University, Uttarakhand, India Mob: 08882590557. **Lecturer, Dolphin Institute, Uttarakhand. India
http://www.srji.co.cc
Vol.1 ● No.2 ● 2012
31
Scientific Research Journal of India
Safety Positions for Healthy Sex Following Back Pain B.Arun.* MPT, CMPT
Abstract: Sexual rehabilitation is never a part of low back rehabilitation in India. Sex is enjoyment, which should be liked by both the partners, around the world about eight out of every 10 people has experiencing back pain at some time in their lives, Back pain could cause difficulty in day-to-day activities. Crisis on partner’s relationship may occur due to unsatisfactory sex. India a Cultural Rich & Religious country will posse’s mysterious side on sex and people live in India have closed mouth attitude on sex. Fear about pain during sex is the first thing which produces fear on sex. The partners should understand the facts on pain and accommodate the new positions for happy and healthy sex. Variety of recommended positions is there which help to alleviate pain and gives good support and satisfaction to both partners.
Key words: Sexual Rehabilitation, Sex, Low Back Pain, Physiotherapy
INTRODUCTION Sex is pleasure, it is a wonderful feeling experienced by both partners. The
activity for both the partners. Pain in the back is one of the major causes of it.1
interpersonal relationship between the
Sexuality is an integral part of
partners brings a firm emotional bond.
normal and healthy relationships. It need
Sexual activity has not only produced by
not be the first thing abandoned when you
physical,
emotional aspects but also
are bothered by a flare-up of Back pain.2
biological aspects in human. The strong
Though it is chronic it should not prevent
union between the partners may be
one from enjoying this part of the
wrecked due to a variety of causes. One of
relationship.
the major causes for the breakage is
Low back pain is the most common
unhappiness or dissatisfaction. Pain may
musculoskeletal problem encountered by
produce disappointments during sexual
most adult population around the world. Four out of five adults will experience http://www.srji.co.cc
Vol.1 â&#x2014;? No.2 â&#x2014;? 2012
32
Scientific Research Journal of India
significant back pain sometime during
Literatures supports that the physical
their
cold,
activity during sex produce similar stress
problems caused by the back are the most
to back same like lifting, pulling ect.. On
frequent cause of lost work days in adults
while performing a vigorous movement in
under the age of forty-five. 3, 7
the pelvic region there is an increased
life.
After
the
common
scenario,
stress at the back. During anterior tilting of
rehabilitation of back pain concludes when
pelvis, the back muscles get compressed
a patient has significant reduction of pain
with ligaments and other soft tissues. The
or he has got ability to do all ADL
repetitive activity produces more stress to
activities, like day to day activities or
the muscles, fascia and bones around the
handling
back result in pain.
In
the
job
Indian
task
ect..
Very
few
rehabilitation protocols followed in India
People with back pain are usually
focuses on the other parts of rehabilitation.
aware which positions could cause pain
Mostly sexual rehabilitation is not the
and they are able to find out which
choice of treatment for patient living in
positions tend to increase or provoke pain.
India.
During vigorous sexual activity there is Sexual
inhibited
by
activity acute
is
frequently
pain.
Sexual
more stress in the lumbar region which can prevent
active
participation
of
the
dysfunctions following back pain is the
individual and most of the time back pain
common
infrequently
ruins their intercourse. A good scheme to
discussed with the therapist. The reasons
keep enjoying sex is to choose sensuality
for this closed mouth attitude are multiple.
over sexuality.
complaint
but
People who are suffering with it feel that
Back pain may ruin sexual life and
they may be the only ones having the
may wreck the relationship between the
problem and therefore embarrassed to talk
partners. So finding the positions which
about it, even with the doctor or to the
help to reduce or minimize pain is
therapist. Some doctors do not feel
important for a successful sexual life.
comfortable with the subject, or may not
Modified positions are there to reduce
even recognize it as a problem.4
stress in the back and help in safe sex. Conditions like herniated disk, spinal
WHY PAIN OCCURS DURING SEX? During the sexual activity between the
partners
musculoskeletal
there
are
activity
arthritis, & Sacroiliac joint dysfunctions need modification of the positions. 7
of
Fear of pain may ruin the sexual
happens.
life between the partners. Back pain
number
http://www.srji.co.cc
Vol.1 ● No.2 ● 2012 doesn’t
stop
the
33
Scientific Research Journal of India sexual
relationship
between the partners. In fact it tells to
Apart from it the modified positions will also help to ease pain.
accommodate the position to get rid of
Physical fitness doesn’t mean that
pain. Back pain is more of psychological
the partner is able to handle the pain.
than physical. The most part of pain
Mental fitness is as important as physical
depends on mental status of the person.
fitness.
Understanding
the
problem
between the partners is very important for managing for the problem. Having a good
HOW TO ASSESS IT? Various Back disability scale has an
inclusion
of
sexual
communication and developing a positive
relationship
attitude can reduce the anxiety and
questionnaire. Like, Oswestry has one part
apprehension between the partners. Sexual
which focuses on sexual relationship. The
intercourse provides a natural pelvic tilt
scale by Laumann et al., 2005, has come
movement which is to be encouraged to
up with a scale to find out sexual
relieve lower back pain. Partners must
dysfunction in males. The scale will be
create and use of other sexual techniques
helpful in evaluating the dysfunction.
that can spare the back, like touching, atmosphere creation and oral sex. Create an atmosphere that is very romantic and
HOW TO MANAGE IT? Learning up a new posture or pain
not be rushed, relaxed and peaceful. Begin
relieving methods like massage or ice prior
with oral method and followed with
to the sex helps in reducing pain and
recommended potions.
stress. Usually people with back pain are aware of which positions those cause pain and they usually avoid such positions or movements.
1
RECOMMENDED POSITIONS No single position is good for all. Positions depend on the type and cause of
People with Back pain should take
back pain and are best consulted with the
a proper rehabilitation measures so that to
rehabilitation
cure pain, there are variety of treatment
recommendations include positions like
measures in physiotherapy, no single
the Missionary position for both men and
treatment
women. 1
is
best
for
all
patients.
staff.
Generally
treatment
If a male partner complains of back
approaches help in regaining the function
pain, he can be at the top of women will
as well as reducing the pain in patients.
help to reduce stress at back, or man can
Combination
of
various
lie at the side of woman either on the front http://www.srji.co.cc
Vol.1 â&#x2014;? No.2 â&#x2014;? 2012
34
Scientific Research Journal of India
or at the back. If a female partner
General advice given to partners are
complains, she can be at the top with
placing a towel at the back reduce the
variety of positions like in bed or sitting in
lumbar curvature which helps to prevent
a chair.
5
pain. People with back pain can be advised
Depending on the type of back
on good sex through illustration described
pain, the position alters. For example,
by Fahrni in 1976. These illustrations give
patients with annular bulge will have an
guidelines to people with back pain.
increase in pain during flexion whereas for a patient with facet problem pain will increase with extension movements. There are no hard and fast rules in dealing pain.
ILLUSTRATIONS FOR DIFFERENT POSITIONS
http://www.srji.co.cc
Vol.1 ● No.2 ● 2012
35
Scientific Research Journal of India
References 1. Danielle Kloeck, “Sex and Back pain” Webb Physiotherapists Inc, http://www.physionline.co.za., 2010, www.spine-dr.com
and
treatments”.
healthynewage.com, 2011. 6. Kamiah A Walkier, “Tips for Better sex....even with back pain”
2. Anthony delitto et al., “exercise based therapy for Low back pain” Sep 2010, uptodate.com.
www.spineuniverse.com, 2008. 7. Grieves.P,
“Common
vertebral
joint problems, Elsevier, 2003.
3. Jerry corners, MD. “ Sex and Back pain”
Healthy
back
institute,
www.losethebackpain.com. 2010 4. Dr.Kraus. Back and neck pain, www. Lowback - pain .com 2008. 5. Louise F. Lynch “Sex and back pain information-causes, Diagnosis
CORRESPONDENCE *Vice principal, K.G.College of Physiotherapy, Coimbatore 35. Email: barunmpt@gmail.com, Mob: 09994576111.
http://www.srji.co.cc
Vol.1 â&#x2014;? No.2 â&#x2014;? 2012
36
Scientific Research Journal of India
Reduced Instruction Set Computer (RISC) 32bit Processor on Field Programmable Gate Arrays (FPGAs) Implementation Thanigaivel.V*, V. Subramanian**, K. Priyadharsan***
Abstract: This paper concerned with the Reduced Instruction Set Computer (RISC) processor on a Field Programmable Gate Arrays (FPGAs). The processor has been designed with VHDL, synthesized using Xilinx ISE 9.1i Web pack, with ModelSim simulator, and then implement on Xilinx Spartan 2E FPGA that has 143 presented Input/ Output pins and 50MHz clock oscillator. The test bench waveforms for the different parts of the processor are obtainable and the system architecture is established.
Key words- Processor, HDL,FPGA, RISC, CPU.
INTRODUCTION The Computer Engineering is very
development board, DIO1, and DIO2
much concerned with the cost and
extension boards from Digilent have been
performance
the
used for the hardware implementation. The
Reduced
Web pack from Xilinx and ModelSim has
of
implementation
components domain.
in
Instruction Set Computer (RISC) focuses
been used for synthesis and simulation.
on reducing the number and complexity of instructions in the machine.1,
2
Field
System Construction
Programmable Gate Arrays (FPGAs) are
The RISC processor presented in
growing fast with cost reduction compared
this paper consists of three components as
3
to ASIC design. In this paper a low cost
shown in Figure .1, these Components are
32bit RISC Processor has been designed
the Control Unit (CU), the Data Path, and
and synthesized, the design has been
the ROM. The Central Processing Unit
described
some
(CPU) has 17 instructions. In the following
components have been implemented and
sections we will describe the design of the
using
VHDL, 4, 5, 6, 7
tested on Xilinx FPGA.
and
Spartan 2E
three main components of the processor. http://www.srji.co.cc
Vol.1 â&#x2014;? No.2 â&#x2014;? 2012
37
Scientific Research Journal of India
ROM then decoding the parts of the order. The decoding state will also select the next state depending on the order; the control unit will jump to the correct state based on the order given. After all states of a running order are finished, the last one will return to the fetch state which will allow us to process the next order in the program. Figure .2 shows the state diagram for the
Figure .1 System constructions
Plan of the ROM The central processing unit has a
control unit.
built in ROM which enables us to program simple code and execute it. It is a basic 16x32 ROM and it is 32bit allied. The List of signals in the ROM list. Address: address sent by the control unit Data out : data that is contained the given address Read
: signal to enable reading from the ROM
Ready
: signal to indicate when the ROM is
Design of the Data Path
Ready for reading CLK
: clock signal
Reset
: Initial reset signal
Figure 2: control unit Design
The Data Path consists of subunits that are necessary for performing all of arithmetic and logic operations. A Data
Plan of the Control Unit
path is a hardware that performs data
The control unit plan is based on
processing operations.8, 9, 10, and 11 It is one
allows each state to run at one clock cycle,
of two types of modules used to represent
the first state is the reset which is
a digital system, the other being a control
initializes the central processing unit
unit. The Data path model we designed
internal
The
consists of the units necessary to perform
machine goes to the reset state by enabling
all the operations on the data selected by
the reset signal for a certain number of
the control unit. The components include a
clocks. Following the reset state would be
Register
the instruction fetching and decoding
Memory Interface and Branching Unit as
states which will enable the suitable
shown in Figure 3.The Register File holds
registers and
variables.
File,
Arithmetic/Logic
Unit,
signals for reading order data from the http://www.srji.co.cc
Vol.1 ● No.2 ● 2012
38
Scientific Research Journal of India
the table of the 32 general purpose registers available to the CPU, it has two output ports (output1, outpu2) and one input port, also it has a 16 bit bus connected directly to the Control Unit to pass immediate data. The ALU design consists of two input ports and one output port which mainly performs operations on two operands. It has a design similar to the control unit which selects an operation based on a code given by the ALUCL. The Memory
Interface
was
designed
accommodate simple load/store operations with the 16x32 memory. The effective address is calculated by adding the content of the address register and the immediate data. The Branch Unit calculates a given condition by the control unit and raises a branch flag whether the condition is met or not, and if the flag is raised, it sends the branch address back to the control unit in order to replace the program counter. The control lines coming from the control unit operate all the units in the data path. The path starts from the register file that has two output ports which are connected to all the other units, after that the processing is done by one of the other units then finally returned back to the register files input port using the multiplexer. The signals used in the data path are forwarded from the control unit to each subcomponent as needed.
Figure 3: Data Path
to RESULTS
There are 5 main signals that are viewed in throughout the simulation. The sim_clock signal is the clock generated for the simulation and runs at 50Mhz, instruction fetch signal shows when the control unit requests data from the ROM, the instruction address 32bit bus is the address of the instruction being fetched, the instruction data 32bit bus is the data sent out from the ROM, and the reset state is enabled for 3.5 cycle to give enough time for all units to reset and initialize, after that we can see the first instruction beginning at address 0 is executed followed by all the proceeding instructions until the instruction at address 40 Which is the shift half word “SHW”. CONCLUSION 32bit RISC Process has been design and implemented in hardware on Xilinx Spartan 2E FPGA. The design has http://www.srji.co.cc
Vol.1 ● No.2 ● 2012
39
Scientific Research Journal of India
been achieved using VHDL and simulated
gate in Spartan 2E is 200K Logic Gate,
with ModelSim. Digilent Spartan 2E
which was not enough for implementing
progress board has been used for the
the whole processor, but parts of the
hardware part. Most of the goals were
processor have been implemented and test
achieve and simulation shows that the
in a real hardware. Future work will be
processor is working perfectly, but the
added by increasing the number of
Spartan 2E FPGA was not sufficient for
instructions and make a pipelined plan
implementing the whole design into a real
with fewer clocks cycles per instruction.
hardware, since the total accessible logic
References 1. John L. Hennessy, and David A.
of a coarsegrain reconfigurable
Patterson, “Computer Architecture
coprocessor for a RISC core”, 2nd
A Quantitative Approach”, 4th
Conference on Ph.D. Research in
Edition; 2006.
Micro Electronics and Electronics
2. Vincent P. Heuring, and Harry F. Jordan, “Computer Systems Design and Architecture”, 2nd Edition, 2003.
Proceedings,
Design, Prentice Hall, 2005. 4. Dal Poz, Marco Antonio Simon,
2006,
p
229232. 6. Rainer Ohlendorf, Thomas Wild, Michael
3. Wayne Wolf, FPGA Based System
PRIME,
Meitinger,
Holm
Rauchfuss, Andreas Herkersdorf, “Simulated
and
performance
measured
evaluation
of
Cobo, Jose Edinson Aedo, Van
RISCbased
Noije, Wilhelmus Adrianus Maria,
network processing applications”,
Zuffo, Marcelo Knorich, “Simple
Journal of Systems Architecture 53
Risc microprocessor core designed
(2007) 703–718.
SoC
platforms
in
for digital settopbox applications”,
7. Luker, Jarrod D., Prasad, Vinod B.,
Proceedings of the International
“RISC system design in an FPGA”,
Conference
MWSCAS
Specific
on
Application
Systems,
Architectures
and Processors, 2000, p 3544. 5. Brunelli Claudio, Cinelli Federico,
2001,
v2,
2001,
p532536. 8. Jiang,
Hongtu;
“FPGA
implementation of controller data
Rossi Davide, Nurmi Jari, “A
path
pair
VHDL model and implementation
processor
in
custom
design”;
image IEEE
http://www.srji.co.cc
Vol.1 ● No.2 ● 2012
40
Scientific Research Journal of India
International
Symposium
on
10. Lou Dongjun, Yuan Jingkun, Li
Circuits and Systems Proceedings;
Daguang, Jacobs Chris, “Data path
2004, p V141V144.
verification
with
System
C
9. K.Vlachos, T. Orphanoudakis, Y.
reference model”, ASICON 2005,
Papaeftathiou, N. Nikolaou, D.
6th International Conference on
Pnevmatikatos,
ASIC, 2005, Proceedings, v 2, p
G.
Konstantoulakis, J.A. SanchezP., “Design evaluation
and
performance
of a Programmable
906909. 11. Jiang “FPGA
Hongtu,
Owall
Viktor,
implementation
of
Packet Processing Engine (PPE)
controller data path Pair in custom
suitable for high speed network
image processor design”, IEEE
processors units”, Microprocessors
International
and Microsystems 31, 2007, p
Circuits and Systems, Proceedings
188–199.
v 5, p V141V144.
Symposium
on
CORRESPONDENCE *Centre for Research and Development, PRIST University, Vallam, Thanjavur–613403, Tamilnadu, India. EMail: svthanigaivel@gmail.com. **Centre for Research and Development, PRIST University, Vallam, Thanjavur–613403, Tamilnadu, India. E-Mail: subramaniancrd.prist@gmail.com. ***Centre for Research and Development,
PRIST
University,
Vallam,
Thanjavur–613403,
Tamilnadu,
India.
E-Mail:
kvpriyadharshan@gmail.com
http://www.srji.co.cc
Vol.1 â&#x2014;? No.2 â&#x2014;? 2012
Scientific Research Journal of India
41
Call for Papers Scientific Research Journal of India (SRJI) globally welcomes research scholars & scientists from different fields of science like Botany, Zoology, Medical Sciences, Agricultural Sciences, Environmental Sciences, Natural Sciences, Anthropology etc to contribute their researches in this Open Access Publication. ::For full detail kindly visit:: http://www.srji.co.cc
http://www.srji.co.cc