Chapter 6 The Theory and Estimation of Production
The Theory and Estimation of Production The Production Function Short-Run Analysis of Total, Average, and Marginal Product Long-Run Production Function Estimation of Production Functions Importance of Production Functions in Managerial Decision Making
Learning Objectives Define production function and explain difference between short-run and long-run production function Explain “law of diminishing returns” and how it relates to the Three Stages of Production Define the Three Stages of Production and explain why a rational firm always tries to operate in Stage II
Learning Objectives Provide examples of types of inputs that might go into a production function for a manufacturing or service company Describe various forms of a production function that are used in statistical estimation of these functions Briefly describe the Cobb-Douglas function and cite a few statistical studies that used this particular functional form in their analysis
The Production Function Production function: defines the relationship between inputs and the maximum amount that can be produced within a given period of time with a given level of technology. Mathematically, the production function can be expressed as Q=f(X1, X2, ..., Xk) Q: level of output X1, X2, ..., Xk: inputs used in the production process
The Production Function Key assumptions Some given “state of the art” in the production technology. Whatever input or input combinations are included in a particular function, the output resulting from their utilization is at the maximum level.
The Production Function For simplicity we will often consider a production function of two inputs: Q=f(X, Y) Q: output X: Labor Y: Capital
The Production Function The short-run production function shows the maximum quantity of good or service that can be produced by a set of inputs, assuming the amount of at least one of the inputs used remains unchanged. The long-run production function shows the maximum quantity of good or service that can be produced by a set of inputs, assuming the firm is free to vary the amount of all the inputs being used.
Short-Run and Long-Run Production In the short run some inputs are fixed and some variable e.g. the firm may be able to vary the amount of labor, but cannot change the amount of capital in the short run we can talk about factor productivity
Short-Run and Long-Run Production In the long run all inputs become variable e.g. the long run is the period in which a firm can adjust all inputs to changed conditions in the long run we can talk about returns to scale (compare latter with economies of scale, which is a cost related concept)
Short-Run Changes in Production (Factor Productivity) Units of K Employed 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
37 42 37 31 24 17 8 4 1
60 64 52 47 39 29 18 8 2
Output Quantity (Q) 83 96 107 117 127 78 90 101 110 119 64 73 82 90 97 58 67 75 82 89 52 60 67 73 79 41 52 58 64 69 29 39 47 52 56 14 20 27 24 21 3 4 5 6 7 Units of L Employed
How much does the quantity of Q change, when the quantity of L is increased?
128 120 104 95 85 73 52 17 8
Short-Run Analysis of Total, Average, and Marginal Product Alternative terms in reference to inputs Inputs Factors Factors of production Resources
Alternative terms in reference to outputs Output Quantity (Q) Total product (TP) Product
Short-Run Analysis of Total, Average, and Marginal Product Marginal product (MP): change in output (or Total Product) resulting from a unit change in a variable input. ∆Q MPX = ∆X
Average Product (AP): Total Product per unit of input used. Q APX = X
Short-Run Analysis of Total, Average, and Marginal Product If MP > AP then AP is rising. If MP < AP then AP is falling. MP=AP when AP is maximized.
Short-Run Analysis of Total, Average, and Marginal Product Units of Output 196 184 161
Total Product ∆Q from hiring fourth worker
130
∆Q from hiring third worker 90 ∆Q from hiring second worker 30
∆Q from hiring first worker 1
increasing marginal returns
2
3
4
5
diminishing marginal returns
6
Number of Workers
Short-Run Analysis of Total, Average, and Marginal Product Law of Diminishing Returns: As additional units of a variable input are combined with a fixed input, at some point the additional output (i.e., marginal product) starts to diminish. Nothing says when diminishing returns will start to take effect, only that it will happen at some point. All inputs added to the production process are exactly the same in individual productivity
Short-Run Analysis of Total, Average, and Marginal Product The Three Stages of Production in the Short Run Stage I: From zero units of the variable input to where AP is maximized (where MP=AP) Stage II: From the maximum AP to where MP=0 Stage III: From where MP=0 on
Short-Run Analysis of Total, Average, and Marginal Product AP,MP
Stage I
Stage II
Stage III
APX Fixed input grossly underutilized; specialization and teamwork cause AP to increase when additional X is used
Specialization and teamwork continue to result in greater output when additional X is used; fixed input being properly utilized
MPX Fixed input capacity is reached; additional X causes output to fall
X
Short-Run Analysis of Total, Average, and Marginal Product In the short run, rational firms should only be operating in Stage II. Why not Stage III? Firm uses more variable inputs to produce less output
Why not Stage I? Underutilizing fixed capacity Can increase output per unit by increasing the amount of the variable input
Short-Run Analysis of Total, Average, and Marginal Product What level of input usage within Stage II is best for the firm? The answer depends upon how many units of output the firm can sell, the price of the product, and the monetary costs of employing the variable input.
Short-Run Analysis of Total, Average, and Marginal Product Total Revenue Product (TRP): market value of the firm’s output, computed by multiplying the total product by the market price. TRP = Q · P
Marginal Revenue Product (MRP): change in the firm’s TRP resulting from a unit change in the number of inputs used. TRP MRP = =∆MP ·P ∆X
Short-Run Analysis of Total, Average, and Marginal Product Total Labor Cost (TLC): total cost of using the variable input, labor, computed by multiplying the wage rate by the number of variable inputs employed. TLC = w · X
Marginal Labor Cost (MLC): change in total labor cost resulting from a unit change in the number of variable inputs used. Because the wage rate is assumed to be constant regardless of the number of inputs used, MLC is the same as the wage rate (w).
Short-Run Analysis of Total, Average, and Marginal Product Summary of relationship between demand for output and demand for input A profit-maximizing firm operating in perfectly competitive output and input markets will be using the optimal amount of an input at the point at which the monetary value of the input’s marginal product is equal to the additional cost of using that input. MRP = MLC
Example 1
Note: P = Product Price = $2 W = Cost per unit of labor = $10000 TRP = TP x P, MRP = MP x P TLC = X x W MLC = ∆TLC / ∆X
Table 7.6 Combining Marginal Revenue Product (MRP) with Marginal Labor Cost (MLC) Total Marginal Total Marginal Labor Total Average Marginal Revenue Revenue Labor Labor Unit Product Product Product Product Product Cost Cost (X) (Q or TP) (AP) (MP) (TRP) (MRP) (TLC) (MLC) TRP-TLC MRP-MLC 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 10000 10000 10000 20000 20000 10000 10000 10000 10000 2 25000 12500 15000 50000 30000 20000 10000 30000 20000 3 45000 15000 20000 90000 40000 30000 10000 60000 30000 4 60000 15000 15000 120000 30000 40000 10000 80000 20000 5 70000 14000 10000 140000 20000 50000 10000 90000 10000 6 75000 12500 5000 150000 10000 60000 10000 90000 0 7 78000 11143 3000 156000 6000 70000 10000 86000 -4000 8 80000 10000 2000 160000 4000 80000 10000 80000 -6000
Short-Run Analysis of Total, Average, and Marginal Product Multiple variable inputs Consider the relationship between the ratio of the marginal product of one input and its cost to the ratio of the marginal product of the other input(s) and their cost.
MP1 MP2 MPk = = w1 w2 wk e.g., country 1 w=$2 MP(L)=2 country 2 w=$4 MP(L)=6 Then, where to produce a product? Other factors may outweigh this relationship Political/Economic risk factors`
The Long-Run Production Function In the long run, a firm has enough time to change the amount of all its inputs. Effectively, all inputs are variable.
The long run production process is described by the concept of returns to scale.
The Long-Run Production Function If all inputs into the production process are doubled, three things can happen: output can more than double increasing returns to scale (IRTS)
output can exactly double constant returns to scale (CRTS)
output can less than double decreasing returns to scale (DRTS)
The Long-Run Production Function One way to measure returns to scale is to use a coefficient of output elasticity:
Percentage change in Q EQ = Percentage change in all inputs If EQ > 1 then IRTS If EQ = 1 then CRTS If EQ < 1 then DRTS
The Long-Run Production Function Returns to scale can also be described using the following equation hQ = f(kX, kY) If h > k then IRTS If h = k then CRTS If h < k then DRTS
Long-Run Changes in Production (Returns to Scale) Units of K Employed 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
37 42 37 31 24 17 8 4 1
60 64 52 47 39 29 18 8 2
Output Quantity (Q) 83 96 107 117 127 78 90 101 110 119 64 73 82 90 97 58 67 75 82 89 52 60 67 73 79 41 52 58 64 69 29 39 47 52 56 14 20 27 24 21 3 4 5 6 7 Units of L Employed
128 120 104 95 85 73 52 17 8
How much does the quantity of Q change, when the quantity of both L and K is increased?
The Long-Run Production Function Graphically, the returns to scale concept can be illustrated using the following graphs.
Q
IRTS
Q
X,Y
DRTS
CRTS
Q
X,Y
X,Y
Estimation of Production Functions Forms of Production Functions Short run: existence of a fixed factor to which is added a variable factor One variable, one fixed factor Q = f(L)K Increasing marginal returns followed by decreasing marginal returns Cubic function Q = a + bL + cL2 – dL3 Diminishing marginal returns, but no Stage I Quadratic function Q = a + bL - cL2
Estimation of Production Functions Forms of Production Functions Power function Q = aLb If b > 1, MP increasing If b = 1, MP constant If b < 1, MP decreasing Can be transformed into a linear equation when expressed in logarithmic terms logQ = loga + bLogL
Estimation of Production Functions Forms of Production Functions Cobb-Douglas Production Function: Q = aLbKc Both capital and labor inputs must exist for Q to be a positive number Can be increasing, decreasing, or constant returns to scale b + c > 1, IRTS b + c = 1, CRTS b + c < 1, DRTS
Permits us to investigate MP for any factor while holding all others constant Elasticities of factors are equal to their exponents
Estimation of Production Functions Forms of Production Functions Cobb-Douglas Production Function Can be estimated by linear regression analysis Can accommodate any number of independent variables Does not require that technology be held constant Shortcomings: Cannot show MP going through all three stages in one specification Cannot show a firm or industry passing through increasing, constant, and decreasing returns to scale Specification of data to be used in empirical estimates`
Estimation of Production Functions Statistical Estimation of Production Functions Inputs should be measured as “flow” rather than “stock” variables, which is not always possible. Usually, the most important input is labor. Most difficult input variable is capital. Must choose between time series and crosssectional analysis.
Estimation of Production Functions Aggregate Production Functions Many studies using Cobb-Douglas did not deal with individual firms, rather with aggregations of industries or an economy. Gathering data for aggregate functions can be difficult. For an economy: GDP could be used For an industry: data from Census of Manufactures or production index from Federal Reserve Board For labor: data from Bureau of Labor Statistics
Importance of Production Functions in Managerial Decision Making Production levels do not depend on how much a company wants to produce, but on how much its customers want to buy. Capacity Planning: planning the amount of fixed inputs that will be used along with the variable inputs. Good capacity planning requires: Accurate forecasts of demand Effective communication between the production and marketing functions
How to determine optimal combination of inputs in the long-run • To illustrate this case, use “production isoquants” An isoquant is a curve showing all possible combinations of inputs physically capable of producing a given fixed level of output
Example 2 Production Table Units K Units of of K Employed Employed 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
37 42 37 31 24 17 8 4 1
60 64 52 47 39 29 18 8 2
Output Quantity (Q) Isoquant 83 96 107 117 127 128 78 90 101 110 119 120 64 73 82 90 97 104 58 67 75 82 89 95 52 60 67 73 79 85 41 52 58 64 69 73 29 39 47 52 56 52 14 20 27 24 21 17 3 4 5 6 7 8 Units of of K L Employed
An Isoquant Curve Graph of Isoquant Y
7 6
Q=52
5 4 3 2 1 0 1
2
3
4
6
X
Substituting Inputs There exists some degree of substitutability between inputs. Different degrees of substitution: Natural flavoring
Capital
Q
Sugar a) Perfect substitution
All other ingredients b) Perfect complementarity
K1 K2 K3 K4
Corn syrup
Q
L 1 L2
L3
L4
Labor
c) Imperfect substitution
Substituting Inputs (continued) In case the two inputs are imperfectly substitutable, the optimal combination of inputs depends on the degree of substitutability and on the relative prices of the inputs
Substituting Inputs (continued) • The degree of imperfection in substitutability is measured with marginal rate of technical substitution (MRTS): MRTS = ∆Y/∆X (in this MRTS some of L is removed from the production and substituted by K to maintain the same level of output)
Law of Diminishing Marginal Rate of Technical Substitution: Table Input Combinations for Isoquant Q = 52 Combination Y X A 6 2 B 4 3 C 3 4 D 2 6 E 2 8
∆ Y ∆ X MRTS 2 1 2 1 1 1 1 2 1/2 0 2
Law of Diminishing Marginal Rate of Technical Substitution (continued) Y 7
A
6 5
B
∆Y =- 2
4
C
∆X = 1 ∆Y = -1
3
D
∆X = 1
2
∆Y = -1
E
∆X = 2
1 0 2
3
4
6
8
X
MRTS = ∆Y/∆X = MPX /MPY Units of Y Employed 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
37 42 37 31 24 17 8 4 1
60 64 52 47 39 29 18 8 2
Output Quantity (Q) 83 96 107 117 127 78 90 101 110 119 64 73 82 90 97 58 67 75 82 89 52 60 67 73 79 41 52 58 64 69 29 39 47 52 56 14 20 27 24 21 3 4 5 6 7 Units of of K X Employed
128 120 104 95 85 73 52 17 8
MRTS = ∆Y/∆X = MPX /MPY MPX / MPY in Relation to MRTS (X for Y) Combination Q A 52 B 52 C 52 D 52
Y MPx X Mpy MRTS (L for K) MPL / MPK 6 2 4 13 3 6.5 2 2 3 11 4 11 1 1 2 6.5 6 13 1/2 1/2
Importance of production functions in managerial decision making • Example: cell phones • Asian consumers want new phone every 6 months • demand for 3G products • Nokia, Samsung, SonyEricsson must be speedy and flexible (lean manufacturing)
Importance of production functions in managerial decision making • Example: Zara • Spanish fashion retailer • factories located close to stores • quick response time to suggestion in 2-4 weeks (competitors’ responding time in 4 to 12 months)
Importance of production functions in managerial decision making • Application: call centers • service activity • production function is Q = f(X,Y) where Q = number of calls X = variable inputs Y = fixed input
Importance of production functions in managerial decision making • Application: China’s workers • is China running out of workers? • industrial boom • e.g., bicycle factory in Guangdong Province
Chapter 7 The Theory and Estimation Of Cost
The Theory and Estimation of Cost The Importance of Cost in Managerial Decisions The Definition and Use of Cost in Economic Analysis The Relationship Between Production and Cost The Short Run Cost Function The Long Run Cost Function The Learning Curve Economies of Scope Economies of Scale: the Short Run Versus the Long Run Supply Chain Management Ways Companies Have Cut Costs to Remain Competitive
Learning Objectives Define the cost function and explain the difference between a short-run and a long-run cost function. Explain the linkages between the production function and the cost function. Distinguish between economic cost and accounting cost. Explain how the concept of relevant cost is used in the economic analysis of cost. Define short-run total cost, short-run variable cost, and total fixed cost and explain their relationship to each other.
Learning Objectives Define average cost, average variable cost, and average fixed cost and explain their relationship to each other in the short run. Do the same for average cost and average variable cost in the long run. Compare and contrast the short-run cost function and the long-run cost function and explain why economies of scale is considered to be a long-run phenomenon. Provide at least four reasons for the existence of economies of scale.
The Importance of Cost in Managerial Decisions Ways to contain or cut costs over the past decade Most common: reduce number of people on the payroll Outsourcing components of the business Merge, consolidate, then reduce headcount
The Definition and Use of Cost in Economic Analysis Relevant cost: a cost that is affected by a management decision. Historical cost: cost incurred at the time of procurement. vs. Replacement cost Opportunity cost: amount or subjective value that is forgone in choosing one activity over the next best alternative. vs. Out-of-pocket cost Incremental cost: varies with the range of options available in the decision. Sunk cost: does not vary in accordance with decision alternatives.
Cost as an Opportunity Cost • A firm’s cost of production includes all the opportunity costs of making its output of goods and services. • Explicit and Implicit Costs – A firm’s cost of production include explicit costs and implicit costs. • Explicit costs are input costs that require a direct outlay of money by the firm. • Implicit costs are input costs that do not require an outlay of money by the firm.
Cost as an Opportunity Cost • Example: • Helen uses $300 000 of her savings to buy her cookie factory from the previous owner. • If she had left her money in a savings account that pays an interest at a rate of 5 percent, she would have earned $15 000 a year. • Helen by buying a cookie factory has foregone $15 000 a year in interest income. • This foregone $15 000 is an implicit opportunity cost of Helen’s business. • The accountant will not show this cost.
Economic Profit versus Accounting Profit • Economists measure a firm’s economic profit as total revenue minus total cost, including both explicit and implicit costs. • Accountants measure the accounting profit as the firm’s total revenue minus only the firm’s explicit costs.
Economic Profit Versus Accounting Profit • When total revenue exceeds both explicit and implicit costs, the firm earns economic profit. – Economic profit is smaller than accounting profit.
Economists versus Accountants
How an Economist Views a Firm
Economic profit
How an Accountant Views a Firm Accounting profit
Revenue
Implicit costs
Revenue Total Opportunity Costs
Explicit costs
Explicit costs
The Relationship Between Production and Cost Cost function is simply the production function expressed in monetary rather than physical units. All assumptions used in the short-run production function applied to the short-run cost function Costs are determined by the production technology and input prices. Assume the firm is a “price taker” in the input market (only additional assumption needed to the cost function.
The Relationship Between Production and Cost Total Variable Cost (TVC): the cost associated with the variable input, determined by multiplying the number of units by the unit price. Marginal Cost (MC): the rate of change in total variable cost. ∆TVC W MC = = ∆Q that MP MC will The law of diminishing returns implies eventually increase
Relationship Between Production and Cost • Total variable cost (TVC) is associated with the variable input
Total Input TVC (L) Q (TP) MP (wL) 0 0 0 – Assume w=$500 per unit 1 1,000 1,000 500 (price-taker) 2 3,000 2,000 1,000 3 6,000 3,000 1,500 4 8,000 2,000 2,000 5 9,000 1,000 2,500 6 9,500 500 3,000 7 9,850 350 3,500 8 10,000 150 4,000 9 9,850 -150 4,500
The Relationship Between Production and Cost Plotting TP and TVC illustrates that they are mirror images of each other. When TP increases at an increasing rate, TVC increases at a decreasing rate.
Relationship Between Production and Cost Total cost (TC) is the cost associated with all of the inputs. It is the sum of TVC and TFC. TC=TFC+TVC Marginal Costs Average Costs
Relationship Between Production and Cost Marginal cost (MC) is the change in total cost associated a change in output. ∆TC MC = ∆Q ∆TC ∆(TFC + TVC ) ∆TFC ∆TVC ∆TVC MC = = = + = 0+ ∆Q ∆Q ∆Q ∆Q ∆Q
Relationship Between Production and Cost • Observe that:
Total TVC – When MP is increasing, Input (L) Q MP (wL) MC is decreasing. 0 0 0 – When MP is decreasing, 1 1,000 1,000 500 MC is increasing. 2 3,000 2,000 1,000 3 6,000 3,000 1,500 4 8,000 2,000 2,000 5 9,000 1,000 2,500 6 9,500 500 3,000 7 9,850 350 3,500 8 10,000 150 4,000 9 9,850 -150 4,500
MC 0.50 0.25 0.17 0.25 0.50 1.00 1.43 3.33
Relationship Between Production and Cost The relationship between MP and MC is ∆TVC w • ∆L ∆L 1 w MC = = = w• = w• = ∆Q ∆Q ∆Q MP MP
Law of diminishing returns implies that MC will eventually increase!
The Short Run Cost Function Average total cost (ATC) is the average per-unit cost of using all of the firm’s inputs (TC/Q)
Average variable cost (AVC) is the average per-unit cost of using the firm’s variable inputs (TVC/Q)
Average fixed cost (AFC) is the average perunit cost of using the firm’s fixed inputs (TFC/Q)
The Short Run Cost Function ATC = AFC + AVC
The Short Run Cost Function Production cost graph or map is
The Short Run Cost Function Important Map Observations AFC declines steadily over the range of production. Why? In general, AC is u-shaped. Why? MC intersects the minimum point on AC. Why?
The Short-Run Cost Function Important Observations AFC declines steadily over the range of production. When MC = AVC, AVC is at a minimum. When MC < AVC, AVC is falling. When MC > AVC, AVC is rising. The same three rules apply for average cost (AC) as for AVC.
The Short-Run Cost Function A reduction in the firm’s fixed cost would cause the average cost line to shift downward. A reduction in the firm’s variable cost would cause all three cost lines (AC, AVC, MC) to shift.
The Short-Run Cost Function For simplicity the following assumptions are made: The firm employs two inputs, labor and capital. The firm operates in a short-run production period where labor is variable, capital is fixed. The firm uses the inputs to produce a single product. The firm operates with a fixed level of technology. The firm operates at every level of output in the most efficient way. The firm operates in perfectly competitive input markets and must pay for its inputs at a given market rate. It is a “price taker” in the input markets. The short-run production function is affected by the law of diminishing returns.
The Short-Run Cost Function Standard variables in the short-run cost function: Quantity (Q): the amount of output that a firm can produce in the short run. Total fixed cost (TFC): the total cost of using the fixed input, capital (K) Total variable cost (TVC): the total cost of using the variable input, labor (L) Total cost (TC): the total cost of using all the firm’s inputs, L and K. TC = TFC + TVC
The Short-Run Cost Function Standard variables in the short-run cost function: Quantity (Q): the amount of output that a firm can produce in the short run. Total fixed cost (TFC): the total cost of using the fixed input, capital (K) Total variable cost (TVC): the total cost of using the variable input, labor (L) Total cost (TC): the total cost of using all the firm’s inputs, L and K. TC = TFC + TVC
The Short-Run Cost Function Alternative specifications of the Total Cost function Most commonly: specified as a cubic relationship between total cost and output As output increases, total cost first increases at a decreasing rate, then increases at an increasing rate. Quadratic relationship As output increases, total cost increases at an increasing rate. Linear relationship As output increases, total cost increases at a constant rate.
The Short-Run Cost Function • Example – TC=100+60Q-5Q2+0.7Q3 • TFC=? 100 • AFC=? TFC/Q=100/Q • AC=? TC/Q=100/Q+60-5Q+0.7Q2 • AVC=? TVC/Q=60-5Q+0.7Q2 • MC=? dTC/dQ=60-10Q+2.1Q2
The Long-Run Cost Function In the long run, all inputs to a firm’s production function may be changed. Because there are no fixed inputs, there are no fixed costs. The firm’s long run marginal cost pertains to returns to scale. First, increasing returns to scale. As firms mature, they achieve constant returns, then ultimately decreasing returns to scale.
The LR Relationship Between Production and Cost In the long run, all inputs are variable. What makes up LRAC?
The Long-Run Cost Function When a firm experiences increasing returns to scale: A proportional increase in all inputs increases output by a greater proportion. As output increases by some percentage, total cost of production increases by some lesser percentage.
The Long-Run Cost Function Economies of Scale: situation where a firm’s long-run average cost (LRAC) declines as output increases. Diseconomies of Scale: situation where a firm’s LRAC increases as output increases. In general, the LRAC curve is u-shaped.
The Long-Run Cost Function Reasons for long-run economies Specialization in the use of labor and capital. Prices of inputs may fall as the firm realizes volume discounts in its purchasing. Use of capital equipment with better price-performance ratios. Larger firms may be able to raise funds in capital markets at a lower cost than smaller firms. Larger firms may be able to spread out promotional costs.
The Long-Run Cost Function Reasons for Diseconomies of Scale Scale of production becomes so large that it affects the total market demand for inputs, so input prices rise. Transportation costs tend to rise as production grows. Handling expenses, insurance, security, and inventory costs affect transportation costs.
The Long-Run Cost Function In long run, the firm can choose any level of capacity. Once it commits to a level of capacity, at least one of the inputs must be fixed. This then becomes a short-run problem. The LRAC curve is an envelope of SRAC curves, and outlines the lowest per-unit costs the firm will incur over a range of output.
The Long-Run Cost Function Dollars ATC1
$4.00
ATC0
LRATC
ATC3
ATC2
3.00
C
2.00
B A
D E
1.00
0
30 Use 0 automated lines
90
130
161 184 175 196
Use 1 automated lines 90
250
Use 2 automated lines
300
Use 3 automated lines
Units of Output
The Learning Curve Learning Curve: line showing the relationship between labor cost and additional units of output. Downward slope indicates additional cost per unit declines as the level of output increases because workers improve with practice. Measured in terms of percentage decrease in additional labor cost as output doubles. The Learning Curve effect shifts the SRAC curve down Yx = Kxn
Yx = Units of factor or cost to produce the xth unit K = Factor units or cost to produce the Kth (usually first) unit x = Product unit (the xth unit) n = log S/log 2 S = Slope parameter
Sources of Learning • The experience of the workforce tends to increase with cumulative output—thus workers are more familiar with the production process and have their movements/activities become routinized or a matter of habit. • There are usually several ways to do a task, and it takes time and experimentation to find the best way. • Quality control for inputs and outputs needs time to identify potential problem areas. • Input suppliers have their owning learning process
The Learning Curve • Measures the percentage decrease in additional labor cost each time output doubles. – An “80 percent” learning curve implies that the labor costs associated with the incremental output will decrease to 80% of their previous level.
Economies of Scope If a single firm can jointly produce goods X and Y more cheaply that any combination of firms could produce them separately, then the production of X and Y is characterized by economies of scope Closely related to economies of scale.
Real world examples • Economies of scope between cable TV and high speed internet service. • Production of timber and particle board. • Corn and ethanol production • Production of beef and hides. • Power generation and distribution • Joint cargo and passenger transportation in airlines reduces excess capacity. • Global wholesale distribution of cheese, salad dressing, and cigarettes (example: Phillip-Morris-Kraft). • Computer aided design of (CAD) of aircraft components.
Supply chain management • Ways to develop better supplier relationships – strategic alliance: firm and outside supplier join together in some sharing of resources – competitive tension: firm uses two or more suppliers, thereby helping the firm keep its purchase prices under control
Supply Chain Management Supply Chain Management (SCM): efforts by a firm to improve efficiencies through each link of a firm’s supply chain from supplier to customer. The main goal: to increase its profit by cost reduction Includes all internal and external activities required to fulfill a customer’s demand. Transaction costs are incurred by using resources outside the firm. Coordination costs arise because of uncertainty and complexity of tasks. Information costs arise because information is essential to the proper coordination of activities between the firm and its suppliers.
Supply Chain Management
Raw Materials purchases from Supplier (procurement)
Manufacturing /Production Efficiencies
Transportation efficiencies
Distribution And Warehouse efficiencies
Retail Distribution Efficiencies And need forecasting
Customer order fulfillment and satisfaction
Ways Companies Have Cut Costs to Remain Competitive The Strategic Use of Cost – cost leadership as the core of its strategy e.g., Wal-Mart and Southwest Airlines (low cost provider);Southwest Airlines cost reduction by (1)payroll (hiring nonunion personnel), (2) food service, and (3) depreciation (old model airplanes) Reduction in Cost of Materials – material substitution or modification (e.g., deer park bottled water container saving material and protecting the environment ) Using Information Technology to Reduce Costs – e.g., using IT to reduce costs with ERP (enterprise resource planning) ERP: software that enables companies to integrate their planning, scheduling, synchronization, and tacking of the entire chain of production process SAP, a German company is an this industry leader
Ways Companies Have Cut Costs to Remain Competitive • Reduction of Process Costs – e.g., employees using software packages to file traveling and expense reports electronically • Relocation to Lower-Wage Countries or Regions • Mergers, Consolidation, and Subsequent Downsizing • Layoffs and Plant Closings (downsizing or restructuring) • Reduction in Fixed Assets – e.g., property, plant, equipment, intellectual property, and etc.
Global application • Example: manufacturing chemicals in China • labor content relatively low (capital intensive industry) • high use of equipment and raw materials • noncost reasons for outsourcing (production over company’s capacity, lack of necessary expertise, regulatory permits required, and etc.,)
Chapter 8 Pricing and Output Decisions: Perfect Competition and Monopoly
Pricing and Output Decisions: Perfect Competition and Monopoly Competition and Market Types in Economic Analysis Pricing and Output Decisions in Perfect Competition Pricing and Output Decisions in Monopoly Markets The Implications of Perfect Competition and Monopoly for Managerial Decision Making
Learning Objectives Describe the key characteristics of the four basic market types used in economic analysis. Compare and contrast the degree of price competition among the four market types. Provide specific actual examples of the four types of markets. Explain why the P=MC rule leads firms to the optimal level of production.
Learning Objectives Describe what happens in the long run in markets where firms that are either incurring economic losses or are making economic profits. Explain why this happens with particular attention to the key assumptions used in this analysis. Explain how and why the MR=MC rule helps a monopoly to determine the optimal level of price and output. Explain the relationship between the MR=MC rule and the P=MC rule.
Socially Optimal Resource Allocation
To say that the scheme of resource allocation is “socially optimal” means that a re-allocation of resources could not make any one person better off without making at least one other person worse off.
Socially Optimal Resource Allocation We can trust market forces to allocate resources in a socially optimal way—that is, if markets are “competitive” in structure. If markets are “imperfectly” competitive in structure, then all bets are off.
Four Basic Market Types • How do firms establish their prices and output levels in order to achieve their business objective of profit maximizing? – The pricing and output decisions normally made within the frame work of four basic types of markets
Four Basic Market Types Perfect Competition (no market power) Large number of relatively small buyers and sellers Standardized product (no differentiation of products) Very easy market entry and exit Nonprice competition not possible (e.g., marketing)
Monopoly (absolute market power subject to government regulation) One firm, firm is the industry Unique product or no close substitutes Market entry and exit difficult or legally impossible Nonprice competition not necessary
Four Basic Market Types Monopolistic Competition (market power based on product differentiation) Large number of relatively small firms acting independently Differentiated product Market entry and exit relatively easy Nonprice competition very important
Oligopoly (market power based on product differentiation and/or the firm’s dominance of the market) Small number of relatively large firms that are mutually interdependent Differentiated or standardized product Market entry and exit difficult Nonprice competition very important among firms selling differentiated products
Four market types • Examples: perfect competition – agricultural products (e.g., corn, wheat , coffee, pork bellies) – financial instruments (e.g., stock, bonds, foreign exchange) – precious metals (e.g., gold, silver, platinum) – Petroleum (exception, OPEC (cartel))
Four market types • Examples: monopoly – Pharmaceuticals (temporary monopoly protected by patent) – Microsoft (pc operating system) – gas station on edge of desert (particular surrounding) – only one in the region
Four market types • Examples: monopolistic competition – boutiques – restaurants – repair shops
Four market types • Examples: oligopoly – oil refining – tobacco – airlines – internet access
Four Basic Market Types by Characteristics Affecting the Degree of Competition
Competition And Market Types of Economic Analysis •
•
•
In economic analysis, the most important indicator of the degree of competition: the ability of firms to control the price and use it as a competitive weapon A second key measure of competition: the ability of firms to earn an above normal or economic profit in the long run – Market entry and exit most directly affecting the ability of firms to earn economic profit A secondary role in determining the degree of competition – Nonprice competition – product differentiation through advertisement, promotion, new product development, introduction of new features in the current products, and customer service – The extend to which buyer and seller have information about the price of the product and the product itself (quality, reliability, and integrity)
Pricing and Output Decisions in Perfect Competition The Basic Business Decision: firms considering to enter into a perfectly competitive market on the basis of the following questions: How much should we produce? If we produce such an amount, how much profit will we earn? If a loss rather than a profit is incurred, will it be worthwhile to continue in this market in the long run (in hopes that we will eventually earn a profit) or should we exit?
Pricing and Output Decisions in Perfect Competition • Although the market price does not vary with an individual firm’s level of output, the unit cost (AC) of production most certainly does in a perfectly competitive market. – why? • Once a law of diminishing returns sets in, then an extra cost per unit will exceed the selling price of the product
Pricing and Output Decisions in Perfect Competition Key assumptions of the perfectly competitive market The firm operates in a perfectly competitive market and therefore is a price taker. The firm makes the distinction between the short run and the long run. The firm’s objective is to maximize its profit in the short run. If it cannot earn a profit, then it seeks to minimize its loss. The firm includes its opportunity cost of operating in a particular market as part of its total cost of production.
Pricing and Output Decisions in Perfect Competition • Suppose the manager of a “stop and shop” convenience store manager wants to own and operate a store of her own. She will have to leave a job and use her savings to own and operate her own shop. – Her current salary: $45,000 – Her savings (yielding 10% return): $50,000
A statement of the projected cost of
operating in the first year Cost of goods sold $300,000 General and administrative expenses $150,000 Total accounting costs $450,000 Forgone Salary $45,000 Forgone returns (10% yield) $5,000 Total opportunity costs $50,000 Total economic cost $500,000
Normal Profit, Economic Profit, and Economic Profit Normal Profit
Economic Profit
Economic Loss
Revenue
$500,000
$550,000
$480,000
Accounting Cost
-$450,000
-$450,000
-$450,000
Opportunity Cost
-$50,000
-$50,000
-$50,000
$0
$50,000
-$20,000
Note: Accounting Profit
Accounting profit of
Accounting profit of
for $50,000 equals the
$100,000 exceeds the
$30,000 is less than
opportunity cost of
opportunity cost
the opportunity cost
$50,000
of $50,000.
of $50,000
Profit
Pricing and Output Decisions in Perfect Competition • •
•
•
As a price taker, the firm facing a perfectly elastic demand curve Perfectly Elastic demand curve: consumers are willing to buy as much as the firm is willing to sell at the going market price. Firm receives the same marginal revenue from the sale of each additional unit of product; equal to the price of the product. No limit to the total revenue that the firm can gain in a perfectly competitive market.
Pricing and Output Decisions in Perfect Competition 1. The intersection of the market supply and the market demand curve…
Price per Ounce
Market
3. The typical firm can sell all it wants at the market price…
Price per Ounce
Firm
S
$400
$400
Demand Curve Facing the Firm
D
Ounces of Gold per Day 2. determine the equilibrium market price
Ounces of Gold per Day 4. so it faces a horizontal demand curve
Pricing and Output Decisions in Perfect Competition Total Revenue-Total Cost approach: Compare the total revenue and total cost schedules and find the level of output that either maximizes the firm’s profits or minimizes its loss. Marginal Revenue – Marginal Cost Approach A firm that wants to maximize its profit (or minimize its loss) should produce a level of output at which the additional revenue received from the last unit is equal to the additional cost of producing that unit. In short, MR=MC. For the perfectly competitive firm, the MR=MC rule may be restated as P=MC. This is because P=MR in perfectly competitive markets.
Selecting the Optimal Output Level 1. TR – TC Approach
Selecting the Optimal Output Level 1. TR – TC Approach Graphically, find the output level that maximizes the distance between the total revenue curve and the total cost curve.
Selecting the Optimal Output Level 2. MR – MC Approach
Selecting the Optimal Output Level 2. MR – MC Approach • The optimal level of output level determined at MR=MC – A firm that wants to maximize it profit (or minimize its loss) should produce a level of output at which the additional revenue received from the last unit is equal to the additional cost of producing the unit.
Pricing and Output Decisions in Perfect Competition • The point where P=MR=MC is the optimal output (Q*) • Profit = TR – TC =(P - AC) · Q* • The firm: one of many price taking sellers in the market, so the market can be beneficial, neutral, and malignant
Pricing and Output Decisions in Perfect Competition • The firm incurs a loss. At the optimum output level price is below average cost. • However, since price is greater than average variable cost, the firm is better off producing in the short run, because it will still incur fixed costs greater than the loss.
Pricing and Output Decisions in Perfect Competition • Contribution Margin (CM): the amount by which total revenue exceeds total variable cost. • CM = TR – TVC • If the contribution margin is positive, the firm should continue to produce in the short run in order to defray some of the fixed cost.
Economic Profit, Normal Profit, Loss, and Shutdown What are the firm’s profits in the graph at the right? Normal Profits TR = TC
Economic Profit, Normal Profit, Loss, and Shutdown Should the firm always operate at a loss in the short run? If the price falls to $50 then how much output should the firm produce? Why?
Pricing and Output Decisions in Perfect Competition Shutdown Point: the lowest price at which the firm would still produce At the shutdown point, the price is equal to the minimum point on the AVC. This is where selling at the price results in zero contribution margin. If the price falls below the shutdown point, revenues fail to cover the fixed costs and the variable costs. The firm would be better off if it shut down and just paid its fixed costs.
Perfect Competition Individual Demand Curve
Quantity Demanded at Different Prices
Quantity Supplied at Different Prices
Added together Market Demand Curve
Individual Supply Curve
Added together
Quantity Demanded by All Consumers at Different Prices
Quantity Supplied by All Firms at Different Prices
Market Supply Curve
Market Equilibrium P
Quantity Demanded by Each Consumer
S D Q
Quantity Supplied by Each Firm
Short-Run Equilibrium in Perfect Competition 2. the typical firm operates here, earning economic profit in the short run.
1. When the demand curve is D1 and market equilibrium is here . . .
Price per Bushel
Market Dollars
Firm
S
MC AC
$3.50
2.00
D1
d1
$3.50 Loss per Bushel at p = $2 2.00
d2 Profit per Bushel at p = $3.50
D2 Bushels 400,000 700,000 per Year 3.If the demand curve shifts to D2 and the market equilibrium moves here . . .
4,000
7,000
Bushels per Year
4. the typical firm operates here and suffers a short-run loss.
Pricing and Output Decisions in Perfect Competition In the long run, the price in the competitive market will settle at the point where firms earn a normal profit. economic profit invites entry of new firms shifts the supply curve to the right puts downward pressure on price and reduces profits economic loss causes exit of firms shifts the supply curve to the left puts upward pressure on price and increases profits
Pricing and Output Decisions in Perfect Competition Observations in perfectly competitive markets: The earlier the firm enters a market, the better its chances of earning above-normal profit (assuming a strong demand in the market). As new firms enter the market, firms that want to survive and perhaps thrive must find ways to produce at the lowest possible cost, or at least at cost levels below those of their competitors. Firms that find themselves unable to compete on the basis of cost might want to try competing on the basis of product differentiation instead.
The Competitive Market in the Long Run
Pricing and Output Decisions in Monopoly Markets A monopoly market consists of one firm. The firm is the market. Has the power to establish any price it wants. However, the firm’s ability to set price is limited by the demand curve for its product, and in particular, the price elasticity of demand.
Pricing and Output Decisions in Monopoly Markets • Assume demand is linear. It is downward sloping because the firm is a price setter. • Assume MC is constant. • Choose output where MR=MC, set price at P*.
Pricing and Output Decisions in Monopoly Markets
Pricing and Output Decisions in Monopoly Markets • Demand is the same as before, as is MR. • MC is upward sloping, which shows diminishing returns. • Set output where MR=MC
Implications of Perfect Competition and Monopoly for Decision Making Perfectly competitive market Most important lesson is that it is extremely difficult to make money. Must be as cost efficient as possible. It might pay for a firm to move into a market before others start to enter. Monopoly market Most important lesson is not to be complacent or arrogant and assume their ability to earn economic profit can never be diminished. Changes in economics of a business eventually break down a dominating company’s monopolistic power.
Global application • Example: Bluefin tuna • sushi restaurants operate in monopolistic
competition • bluefin tuna price determined by perfect competition • low profit margin
Chapter9 Pricing and Output Decisions: Monopolistic Competition & Oligopoly
Pricing and Output Decisions: Monopolistic Competition and Oligopoly
Introduction Monopolistic Competition Oligopoly Pricing in an Oligopolistic Market: Rivalry and Mutual Interdependence Competing in Imperfectly Competitive Markets Strategy: The Fundamental Challenge for Firms in Imperfect Competition
Learning Objectives Cite the main differences between monopolistic competition and oligopoly Describe the role that mutual interdependence plays in setting prices in oligopolistic markets Illustrate price rigidity in oligopoly markets using the “kinked demand curve” Elaborate on how non-price factors help firms in monopolistic competition and oligopoly to differentiate their products and services Cite and briefly describe the five forces in Porter’s model of competition
Review of Monopoly • A “pure” monopoly is a market structure in which a single seller accounts for 100 percent of market sales. • Pure monopolies are hard to find in the real world. Economists and judges as a rule believe a 90 percent market share is sufficient to constitute an “effective” monopoly.
Review of Monopoly • Barriers to entry into a monopoly market – “[A]nything which creates a disadvantage for potential entrants vis à vis established firms. The height of the barriers is measured by the extent to which, in the long run, established firms can elevate their selling prices above minimal average cost . . . without inducing potential entrants to enter” [Joe Bain, Industrial Organization, 2nd ed., p. 252]. – Barriers to entry into a market . . . can be defined to be socially undesirable limitations to entry of resources which are due to protection of resource owners already in the market” [Christian von Weizsäcker, Barriers to Entry, p. 13].
Review of Monopoly • Examples of barriers to entry – Absolute advantages • Examples: Alcoa had access to low cost hydroelectric power in Pacific NW; Weyerhauser procured extraction rights to tracts of Douglas fir in 1901; International petroleum majors (Texaco, SOCAL, BP, et al) formed a pipeline consortium in California.
– Economies of Scale • Dominant firm may enjoy cost advantages due to realization of scale economies in production, distribution, capital raising, or sales promotion.
Examples of barriers to entry – Barriers due to control of wholesale, retail distribution systems (continued) • Examples: Control of wholesale diamond distribution by DeBeers; Control of advantageous retail shelf space by Proctor and Gamble, Kellogs.
– Barriers due to patents, copyrights, trademarks, and other legal barriers • Examples: Xerox’s patent on xerography; Polaroid’s patent on instamatic photography
– Barriers due to product differentiation/brand power • Examples: Cigarettes, pain relievers, designer jeans, athletic wear, batteries, soft drinks
Introduction Imperfect Competition (monopolistic competition and oligopoly) Some market power but not absolute market power Have the ability to set prices within the limits of certain constraints Mutual Interdependence: interaction among competitors when making decisions
Introduction Perfect Competition Market Power?
Mutual interdependence among competing firms? Non-price competition? Easy market entry or exit ?
Monopoly
No
No
No Yes
Monopolistic Competition Oligopoly
Yes, subject to Yes government regulation No
No
Optional No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes, relatively
Yes No, relatively
easy
difficult
Monopolistic Competition Characteristics Many firms Relatively easy entry Product differentiation Can set price at a level higher than the price established by perfect competition
Use MR = MC rule to maximize profit If earning above-normal profits, newcomers will enter the market Market supply curve shifts out and to the right Firm’s demand curve shifts down and to the left
Ultimately, in the long run, firms earn only normal profit E.g., Perdue and Tyson (produced chicken producers)
Monopolistic Competition • Profit Maximization – MR=MC rule – What will happen in the long run? Why?
Monopolistic Competition • In the long run, normal profits invite entry. Why? – Entry of additional firms causes the demand curve for each existing firm to shift. – Monopolistically competitive firms earn normal profits.
Oligopoly • Oligopoly is derived from the Greek work “olig” meaning “few” or “a small number.” • Oligopoly is a market dominated by a relatively small number of large firms • Products are either standardized or differentiated
Oligopoly Measures of Market Concentration Herfindahl-Hirschman index (HH): measure of market concentration (max HH = 10,000) n
HH =∑ S i2 i= 1
n: number of firms in the industry Si: firm’s market share Unconcentrated markets have HH < 1,000
Oligopoly Market Concentration
Pricing in an Oligopolistic Market: Rivalry and Mutual Interdependence Mutual Interdependence: relatively few sellers create a situation where each is carefully watching the others as it sets its price. Kinked Demand Curve Model Basic Assumption: competitor will follow a price decrease but will not make a change in reaction to a price increase.
Pricing in an Oligopolistic Market: Rivalry and Mutual Interdependence • Seller interdependence – If Kroger offers deep discounts on soft drinks, will Wal-Mart follow suit? – Northwest Airlines “perks” miles do not expire— how did United, Delta, et al react? – Verizon carries unused minutes over the to next month—implications for Cingular, et. al.? – Alcoa’s decision to add production capacity is conditioned upon the investment plans of rival aluminum producers.
Pricing in an Oligopolistic Market: Rivalry and Mutual Interdependence •
Original price and quantity at point A. – If reduce price and competitors match the price cut then move along more inelastic demand segment Di. – If increase price and competitors do not follow then move along the more elastic segment Df. – Marginal Revenue curve will be discontinuous where the kink occurs (at point A).
•
Accounting for the behavior of the other firms causes the demand curve to be kinked
Competitors do not match price increases Competitors match price cuts
Pricing in an Oligopolistic Market: Rivalry and Mutual Interdependence • In order to maximize profits, apply MR=MC rule. – The MR curve for the kinked demand curve is discontinuous at the kink.
• This leads the firm to charge the same price even if costs change. – Price rigidities – Little empirical support
Pricing in an Oligopolistic Market: Rivalry and Mutual Interdependence
Price Leader: one firm in the industry takes the lead in changing prices. The price leader assumes that firms will follow a price increase. It assumes that firms may follow a reduction in price, but will not go even lower in order not to trigger a price war.
Non-Price Leader: firm that leads the differentiation of products on other, non-price attributes.
Pricing in an Oligopolistic Market: Rivalry and Mutual Interdependence
• Dominant firm price leadership – This is a system of price-output determination we sometimes see in oligopolistic market structures in which there is one firm that is clearly dominant. – General Motors was once the price leader in the U.S. auto industry. – Other “dominant” firms include Du Pont in chemicals, US Steel (now USX), Phillip Morris, Fedex, Boeing, General Electric, AT&T, and Hewlett Packard.
Competing in Imperfectly Competitive Markets Non-Price Competition: any effort made by firms other than a change in the price of the product in question in order to change the demand for their product. Efforts intended to influence the non-price determinants of demand Tastes and preferences Income Prices of substitutes and complements Number of buyers Future expectations of buyers about the product price
Competing in Imperfectly Competitive Markets Non-price variables: any factor that managers can control, influence, or explicitly consider in making decisions affecting the demand for their goods and services. Advertising (tastes and preferences) Promotion (tastes and preferences) Location and distribution channels Market segmentation (income, and tastes and preferences) Loyalty programs Product extensions and new product development Special customer services Product “lock-in” or “tie-in” (price of sub and comp) Pre-emptive new product announcements
Competing in Imperfectly Competitive Markets Equalizing at the margin: general economic concept which managers can use to help make an optimal decision. Can be used to decide the optimal expenditure level of a nonprice factor that influences a firm’s demand. MR = MC is an example of equalizing at the margin.
Revenue and costs may be realized over a long period of time. Firm must adjust MR, MC for the time value of money.
Competing in imperfectly competitive markets • Examples: the reality of ‘imperfect competition’ •
auto industry
•
small retailers
•
global credit card issuers
Oligopoly Game Theory and Pricing Behavior Game theory can be used to explain and predict behavior when there is mutual interdependence. Game theory is concerned with “how individuals make decisions when they are aware that their actions affect each other and when each individual takes this into account.” (Bierman and Fernandez, 1998) Prisoner’s Dilemma Two-person Non-zero-sum Non-cooperative Has a dominant strategy
Oligopoly Game Theory and Pricing Behavior Prisoner’s dilemma Two individuals commit a serious crime together and are apprehended by police They know there is insufficient evidence to convict them of the serious crime. There is enough evidence to convict them of loitering which carries a lesser prison sentence. Each prisoner is interrogated separately with no communication between them.
Oligopoly Game Theory and Pricing Behavior Prisoner’s dilemma, continued: Police tell them that if one of them confesses he will receive a suspended sentence while the other will receive the maximum sentence. If both talk then they will each receive a moderate sentence. What will each suspect do?
Oligopoly Game Theory and Pricing Behavior Prisoner’s dilemma, continued: Payoff Matrix
Oligopoly Game Theory and Pricing Behavior Confessing is a dominant strategy for each player. This is the best strategy no matter what the other player chooses Each player have no incentive to unilaterally change their strategy.
Oligopoly Game Theory and Pricing Behavior
Consider the game between two firms, A and B, described below.
What is the equilibrium?
Oligopoly Game Theory and Pricing Behavior (Low/Low) is a stable equilibrium. No incentive for either firm to deviate. Better off at (High/High) but it is not stable. Each firm has an incentive to deviate.
Oligopoly Game Theory and Pricing Behavior Efficiency implies that there is no other strategy pair that would make one player better off and no player worse off. (High/High) would be an equilibrium if the firms were allowed to cooperate.
Strategy: The Fundamental Challenge for Firms in Imperfect Competition
Strategy is important when firms are price makers and are faced with price and non-price competition as well as threats from new entrants into the market. More important for firms in imperfectly competitive markets than those in perfectly competitive markets or monopoly markets.
Strategy: The Fundamental Challenge for Firms in Imperfect Competition
Economics and strategy can be said to be linked almost by definition Managerial Economics: the use of economic analysis to make business decisions involving the best use of an organization’s scarce resources. Strategy: the means by which an organization uses its scarce resources to relate to the competitive environment in a manner that is expected to achieve superior business performance over the long run.
Strategy: The Fundamental Challenge for Firms in Imperfect Competition
Industrial Organization: studies the way that firms and markets are organized and how this organization affects the economy from the viewpoint of social welfare. How does industry concentration affect the behavior of firms competing in the industry?
Strategy: The Fundamental Challenge for Firms in Imperfect Competition
Structure-Conduct-Performance (S-C-P) Paradigm Structure affects conduct which affects performance Structure: number of firms in industry, conditions of entry, product differentiation Conduct: pricing strategies and other activities such as advertising, product development, legal tactics, choice of product, and potential for collusion Performance: maximization of society’s welfare
Strategy: The Fundamental Challenge for Firms in Imperfect Competition
The S-C-P paradigm says that industry structure determines industry conduct, which in turn determines industry performance. Structure is determined by the prevailing supply and demand conditions. This influences the industry’s conduct—its pricing strategies, advertising, product development, etc. The industry’s performance is measured in terms of how close it comes to achieving the goal of maximizing society’s welfare. A concentrated industry will be less likely to arrive at this norm than an industry where competition rules.
Strategy: The Fundamental Challenge for Firms in Imperfect Competition
The “New” Theory of Industrial Organization There is no necessary connection between industry structure and performance that uniquely leads to maximum social welfare. Weak evidence of relationship between concentration and profit levels. Theory of Contestable Markets Performance by firms is ultimately influenced, not by the presence of competition, but by the threat of potential competition.
Strategy: The Fundamental Challenge for Firms in Imperfect Competition Porter’s Five Forces Model: illustrates the various factors that affect the ability of any firm in the industry to earn a profit.
Strategy: The Fundamental Challenge for Firms in Imperfect Competition Porter’s generic strategies for earning above-average return on investment Differentiation approach: related to the case of a monopoly or monopolistically competitive market Following MR = MC rule, firm sets a price on the demand line that is above AC Cost Leadership approach: based on perfect competition Maintain cost structure low enough so when P = MC, there is a positive difference between P and AC
Case • McDonald’s – hamburgers – Oligopoly in the national (or worldwide) fast food market, but monopolistic competition in local or perhaps regional markets.
• Exxon-Mobile – gasoline – Oligopoly in the national (or worldwide) oil refinery market; monopolistic competition at the local retail market (i.e., neighborhood gas stations).
• Dell – personal computers – Monopolistic competition. The top five computer manufacturers (Dell, Compaq, IBM, Hewlett-Packard, and Gateway 2000) have less than 50% of the PC market in the United States, as well as in the world market.
• Heinz – Ketchup – Oligopoly (almost a duopoly if you think about Heinz and Del Monte essentially dominating the ketchup market).
Case • Starbucks – gourmet coffee – Monopolistic competition. Starbucks may be alone as a national chain, but in local markets there are numerous gourmet coffee establishments.
• Domino’s – pizza – Oligopoly in national pizza chains. Monopolistic competition at the local level.
• Intel – computer chip for the PC – Oligopoly, but because of Intel’s dominance in this market, it could be called “near monopoly.”
Global application • Example: world beer market • neither pure monopoly nor pure competition • US market leader Anheuser Busch (Budweiser, Michelob, and etc.) controls 50% of market in the US • More like monopolistic competition based on pricing power • mature market, with merger activity
Chapter 10 Special Pricing Practices
Special Pricing Policies Cartel Arrangements Price Leadership Revenue Maximization Price Discrimination Nonmarginal Pricing Multiproduct Pricing Transfer Pricing Other Pricing Practices
Learning Objectives Analyze cartel pricing Illustrate price leadership Understand price discrimination, and explain how it affects production and prices Distinguish between marginal pricing and “cost-plus” pricing Discuss the various types of multiproduct pricing Explain the meaning of “transfer pricing,” and explain how a company should price products that pass from one operating division to another
Cartel Arrangements Monopoly profits are the largest profits available in an industry. A cartel arrangement occurs when the firms in an industry cooperate and act together as if they were a monopoly. Cartel arrangements may be tacit or formal Illegal in the U.S. Sherman Antitrust Act, 1890, Clayton Act,1914, and Fair Trade Act, 1931 In 1961, GE, Westinghouse, and other large firms fixing price and market share, pleaded guilty
Examples Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) International Air Transport Association (IATA) Most official cartels found in countries other than the US
Cartel Arrangements Conditions that influence the formation of cartels Small number of large firms in the industry facilitating the policing of a collusive agreement Geographical proximity of the firms favorable Homogeneous products that do not allow differentiation – less incentive to cheat Stage of the business cycle – mixed e.g. during the economic downturn, firms collude to forestall the further price drop or higher incentive for firms to move out from the cartel Difficult entry into industry Uniform cost conditions, usually defined by product homogeneity
Cartel Arrangements Conditions that influence the formation of cartels Small number of large firms in the industry Geographical proximity of the firms Homogeneous products that do not allow differentiation Stage of the business cycle Difficult entry into industry Uniform cost conditions, usually defined by product homogeneity
Cartel Arrangements
• • • •
MCT is the horizontal sum of MCI and MCII QT is found at the intersection of MRT and MCT Price is found from the demand curve at QT This is the price that maximizes total industry profits.
Cartel Arrangements
• • •
In order to determine how much each firm should produce, draw a horizontal line back from the MRT/MCT intersection. Where this line intersects each individual firm’s MC determines that firm’s output, QI and QII. Note that the firms may produce different outputs. The key point is that the marginal cost of the last unit produced is equated across both firms.
Cartel Arrangements
• • •
Profits for each firm are shown as rectangles in blue. Assume that each firm earns profits only from its own sales. Firms may earn different levels of profit, though combined profits are maximized. There is incentive for firms to cheat on agreement, thus cartels are unstable.
Cartel Arrangements Additional costs facing the cartel Formation Costs Monitoring Costs Enforcement Costs Cost of punishment by authorities
Weigh the benefits of collusion (increased profits) against these additional costs.
Cartel arrangements • Examples: price fixing by cartels – GE, Westinghouse – Archer Daniels Midland Company – Sotheby’s, Christie’s – Roche Holding AG, BASF AG
Price Leadership Barometric Price Leadership One firm in an industry will initiate a price change in response to economic conditions. The other firms may or may not follow this leader. Leader may change.
Price Leadership Dominant Price Leadership One firm is recognized as the industry leader. Dominant firm sets price with the realization that the smaller firms will follow and charge the same price. Can force competitors out of business or buy them out under favorable terms. Could result in investigation and prosecution under Sherman Anti-Trust Act.
Price Leadership • • • •
DT is the demand curve facing the entire industry. MCD is the marginal cost curve of the dominant firm. MCR is the summation of the marginal cost curves of all of the follower firms. In choosing its price, the dominant firm has to consider the amount supplied by the follower firms.
Price Leadership •
•
•
The demand curve facing the dominant firm is found by subtracting MCR from DT. This “residual demand curve” is labeled DD. To determine price, the dominant firm equates its marginal cost with the marginal revenue from its residual demand curve. The dominant firm sells A units and the rest of the demand (QT – A) is supplied by the follower firms.
Revenue Maximization Baumol Model Firms may maximize revenue subject to maintaining a specific level of profits. Reasons A firm will become more competitive when it achieves a large size (in terms of revenue). Management remuneration may be more closely related to revenue than profits.
Revenue Maximization Subject to the constraint that acceptable profit level exists. Change in fixed costs will raise the cost curve and lower the profit line. Fixed costs have no effect in profit maximization model.
Price Discrimination Price Discrimination Products with identical costs are sold in different markets at different prices. The ratio of price to marginal cost differs for similar products.
Conditions for Price Discrimination The markets in which the product is sold must by separated. i.e., no resale between markets. The demand curves in the market must have different elasticities.
Price Discrimination First Degree Price Discrimination Seller can identify where each consumer lies on the demand curve and charges each consumer the highest price the consumer is willing to pay. Allows the seller to extract the greatest amount of profits. Requires a considerable amount of information.
Examples of First Degree Price Discrimination • The manager of Suez Canal charges different prices to different ships depending on their cargo, alternative routes, and other characteristics. • Car dealers. • Amazon tried to use cookies to charge different prices
Price Discrimination Second Degree Price Discrimination Differential prices charged by blocks of services. Requires metering of services consumed by buyers. E.g., airlines, fast food drinks, coupons
Third Degree Price Discrimination Customers are segregated into different markets and charged different prices in each. Segmentation can be based on any characteristic such as age, geographic location, gender, income, etc. E.g., student, senior discounts, airlines, US versus UK textbook pricing
Third Degree Price Discrimination
• • •
Assume the firm operates in two markets, A and B. The demand in market A is less elastic than the demand in market B. The entire market faced by the firm is described by the horizontal sum of the demand and marginal revenue curves.
Third Degree Price Discrimination
• • •
The firm finds the total amount to produce by equating the marginal revenue and marginal cost in the market as a whole: QT. If the firm were forced to charge a uniform price, it would find the price by examining the aggregate demand DT at the output level QT. The firm can increase its profits by charging a different price in each market.
Third Degree Price Discrimination
• • •
In order to find the optimum price to charge in each market, draw a horizontal line back from the MRT/MCT intersection. Where this horizontal line intersects each submarket’s MR curve determines the amount that should be sold in each market; QA and QB. These quantities are then used to determine the price in each market using the demand curves DA and DB.
Examples of Price Discrimination • In the past, physicians setting their fees in accordance with patience income • Japanese electronics and French Wines (chare more in a domestic market than in the international market) • Pubs charging less for ladies • Public transportation system (charging less for senior citizens) • Theaters charging lower prices for children • State university charging lower tuition fees for state residents • Public utility companies charging less rate for their business customers
Example of Price Discrimination: Pricing in the Hotel Industry • Differential room rates • A large portion of the cost of running a hotel is fixed (the variable cost of running an empty room is relatively small) • Each additional rented room representing incremental revenue • More typical way of discrimination is to segment the market • Simplest method: separation between leisure travelers and business travelers (more elastic demand for leisure travelers)
Price Discrimination Tying Arrangement: a buyer of one product is obligated to also buy a related product (usually complementary) from the same supplier. Illegal in some cases (creating higher monopoly power) One explanation: a device to “meter” demand for tied product. Other explanations of tying Quality control Efficiencies in distribution: lowered delivery cost Evasion of price controls: charge more on a product with no price ceiling to avoid the price ceiling on the other product
Examples of Tying • Xerox copier leases required lessee to purchase all copying paper from Xerox. • IBM once had a policy to give price quotes for “full line” systems only —i.e., CPUs and plug-compatible peripherals. • Microsoft licensing agreements with Dell, Compaq, Gateway, and other PC makers stipulated that the Internet Explorer icon appear on the desktop after the initial boot up sequence. These licensing agreements created a barrier to entry into the browser segment (or so claimed the DOJ). • International Salt tied industrial rock salt to the lease of salt dispensing machines.
Nonmarginal Pricing Cost-Plus Pricing Price is set by first calculating the variable cost, adding an allocation for fixed costs, and then adding a profit percentage or markup: e.g., variable cost $8, overhead cost $6, the desired markup 25% - price = 1.25 x ($8+$6) =$17.5 Problems with Cost-Plus Pricing Calculation of Average Variable Cost Allocation of Fixed Cost Size of the Markup
Nonmarginal Pricing Incremental Pricing and Costing Analysis Similar to marginal analysis. Incremental analysis deals with changes in total revenue and total cost resulting from a decision to change prices, introduce a new product, discontinue an existing product, improve a product, or acquire additional capital equipment. Only the revenues and costs that will change due to the decision are considered (sunk costs not considered).
Multiproduct pricing
• When the firm produces two or more products Case 1: products are complements in terms of demand an increase in the quantity sold of one will bring about an increase in the quantity sold of the other e.g., personal computer and software Case 2: products are substitutes in terms of demand an increase in the quantity sold of one will bring about a decrease in the quantity sold of the other e.g., cola and lemon lime soda
Multiproduct pricing
• When the firm produces two or more products Case 3: products are joined in production products produced from one set of inputs Case 4: products compete for resources using resources to produce one product takes those resources away from producing other products e.g., Production of different of different models of computer
Transfer Pricing Modern companies are subdivided into several groups or divisions, each of which may be charged with a profit objective. As the product moves through these divisions on the way to the consumer it is “sold” or transferred from one division to another at a “transfer price.” If each division is allowed to choose its own transfer price without any coordination, the final price of the product to consumers may not maximize profits for the firm as a whole.
Transfer Pricing Firms must pay special attention to designing a transfer pricing mechanism that is geared toward maximizing total company profit. Design of the optimal transfer pricing mechanism is complicated by the fact that each division may be able to sell its product in external markets as well as internally. each division may be able to procure inputs from external markets as well as internally.
Transfer Pricing No External Markets No division can buy from or sell to an external market. The divisions must deal with equal quantities. The selling division will produce exactly the number of components that will be used by the purchasing division. One demand curve and two marginal cost curves. Marginal cost curves are summed vertically. Set production where MR = Total MC.
Transfer Pricing External Markets Divisions have the opportunity to buy or sell its inputs/products in a competitive market. If selling division prices above the external market price, the buying division will buy from the external market. If selling division cannot produce enough to satisfy buying division demand, the buying division will buy additional units from the external market.
Other Pricing Practices Price Skimming The first firm to introduce a product may have a temporary monopoly and may be able to charge high prices and obtain high profits until competition enters
Penetration Pricing Selling at a low price in order to obtain market share
Other Pricing Practices Prestige Pricing Demand for a product may be higher at a higher price because of the prestige that ownership bestows on the owner.
Psychological Pricing Demand for a product may be quite inelastic over a certain range but will become rather elastic at one specific higher or lower price.
Global application • Example: decline of European cartels • carton-board • vitamin • copper pipe • elevator operators
Chapter 11 Game Theory and Asymmetric Information
Game Theory and Asymmetric Information Game Theory Games of Particular Relevance in Economics Game Theory and Auctions Strategy and Game Theory
Asymmetric Information Markets with Asymmetric Information Market Responses to Asymmetric Information Reputation Standardization Market Signaling
Learning Objectives Define game theory, and explain how it helps to better understand mutually interdependent management decisions Explain the essential dilemma faced by participants in the game called Prisoners’ Dilemma Explain the concept of a dominant strategy and its role in understanding how auctions can help improve the price for sellers, while still benefiting buyers
Learning Objectives Explain the key problems that arise in a market where buyers and sellers do not have the same information about a product Briefly explain the concepts of “adverse selection” and “moral hazard” and why they exist in the type of market described in the previous objective Explain how “market signaling” can help market participants make better economic decisions when asymmetric information exists between buyers and sellers
Game Theory Optimization has two shortcomings when applied to actual business situations Assumes factors such as reaction of competitors or tastes and preferences of consumers remain constant. Managers sometimes make decisions when other parties have more information about market conditions. Game theory is concerned with “how individuals make decisions when they are aware that their actions affect each other and when each individual takes this into account.” Types of games Zero-Sum or Non-Zero-Sum Cooperative or Non-Cooperative Two-Person or N-Person All solutions involve an equilibrium condition.
Taxonomy of Games
Games of Particular Relevance in Economics •
Prisoners’ Dilemma – Two-Person, Non-Zero-Sum, Non-cooperative – Always has a dominant strategy – Equilibrium is stable
•
Confessing is a dominant strategy for each player. – Best strategy no matter what other player chooses
•
Each player has no incentive to unilaterally change his strategy.
Games of Particular Relevance in Economics • Another Example of Prisoners’ Dilemma – (Low/Low) is a stable equilibrium. No incentive for either firm to deviate. – Better off at (High/High) but it is not stable. Each firm has an incentive to deviate.
• (High/High) would be an equilibrium if the firms were allowed to cooperate.
Games of Particular Relevance in Economics Beach Kiosk Game Two-Person, Zero-Sum, Non-cooperative Example: two companies provide snacks and sunscreen on a beach. Beach is 200 yards long from south to North Beachgoers spread themselves out evenly along the beach. Beachgoers do not have preferences for one vendor over the other. Both companies ultimately locate at the midpoint of the beach, otherwise the other company has an advantage (closer to more beachgoers) Real life example: location of gas stations (located closely)
Games of Particular Relevance in Economics Repeated Game: game is played repeatedly over a period of time. In a repeated game, equilibria that are not stable may become stable due to the threat of retaliation.
Games of Particular Relevance in Economics Repeated Game: game is played many times, and equilibria that are not stable may become stable due to the threat of retaliation. Assume (High, High) equilibrium reached and both firms start off charging the high price. In the next period, if one firm cheats (charges low price), it receives 600 in that period. Other firm will change to low prices in the next period to “retaliate” and both will end up at (Low, Low) equilibrium. Thus, incentive exists not to “cheat” in a repeated game and (High, High) is a viable equilibrium, though it is not in a single-period game. If number of periods are fixed, both firms will have incentive to cheat (charge low price) in the last period due to lack of threat of retaliation, which will then allow them to cheat in all periods.
Games of Particular Relevance in Economics Simultaneous games are games in which players make their strategy choices at the same time. Sequential games are games in which players make their decisions sequentially. In sequential games, the first mover may have an advantage.
Games of Particular Relevance in Economics • Consider the following payoff matrix in which firms choose their capacity, either high or low. • Suppose firm C has the ability to move first. – C would choose Low, then D would choose High.
Game Theory and Auctions Non-cooperative, non-zero-sum game Seller wants to sell at highest price, buyer wants to buy at lowest price. Dutch Auction (Google IPO case in 2004) All product sold at the highest price that clears the market Each buyer describes the quantity demanded and price to pay Starting at highest price, sum quantity demanded up to the quantity available. The associated price for the last quantity added is the price for all products. In an auction with a time limit, every player has a dominant strategy to bid as late as possible.
Game Theory and Auctions • • • •
Google wants to sell ten shares to four bidders Google can not set different prices for same shares Google will set the price at the level required to sell all the shares The actual auction resulted in a price of $85, far less than Google’s originally publicized expectations of between $108 and $135
Bidder
Price
Shares
A
$5
4
B
$6
5
C
$8
2
D
$10
3
Strategy and Game Theory In Prisoners’ Dilemma, players have a dominant strategy that leads to suboptimal results. Commitment, explicit or implicit, can be used to achieve preferred outcomes. Commitment must be credible to have effect. To make a commitment credible: Burn bridges behind you. (making going back impossible) Establish and use a reputation. Write contracts. Incentives also can be used to change the game to achieve preferred outcomes.
Strategy and Game Theory Fundamental aspects of game theory Players are interdependent Uncertainty: other players’ actions are not entirely predictable PARTS: paradigm for studying a situation, predicting players’ actions, making strategic decisions Players: Who are players and what are their goals? Added Value: What do the different players contribute to the pie? Rules: What is the form of competition? Time structure of the game? Tactics: What options are open to the players? Commitments? Incentives? Scope: What are the boundaries of the game?
Asymmetric Information Asymmetric Information: market situation in which one party in a transaction has more information than the other party. Leads to many problems in markets. Too much or too little production Difficult contracting Possible fraud Market may dissappear
Markets with Asymmetric Information •
Adverse Selection: prior to transaction, one party may know more about the value of a good than the other. – E.g., used cars – only lemons left in the used car market Only sellers know their true car values High quality = $4,000 Low quality = $1,000 Buyers paying EV= $,2500 (o.5x4,000+0.5x1000)
•
Moral Hazard: transaction changes the incentives of a party because it cannot be monitored after the transaction. – E.g., insurance company Warehouse = $100,000 Probability of fire Premium=expected loss 1% with no fire prevention program $1,000 0.5% with $50 fire prevention program $500 – To mitigate this problem, co-payments and deductible used by insurance companies
Market Responses to Asymmetric Information Obtaining information from third parties Relying on reputation of the seller Standardization of products Market Signaling: demonstrated success in one activity provides information about success/quality in another.
Asymmetric Information • Example: education as a signal – attending college demonstrates certain traits – employers see this a screening device
Asymmetric Information • Example: warranties – more costly on low quality goods than high quality goods – consumers see them as a screening device
Asymmetric Information • Example: banking systems – banks know less about the borrower’s ability to repay than the customer – arms length banking: US – relationship banking: Japan
Chapter 12 Capital Budgeting and Risk
Capital Budgeting and Risk • The Capital Budgeting Decision • Time Value of Money • Methods of Capital Project Evaluation • Cash Flows • Cost of Capital • The Capital Budgeting Model • Capital Rationing • Risk Versus Uncertainty
• Sources of Business Risk • The Measures of Risk • Capital Budgeting Under Conditions of Risk • Two Other Methods for Incorporating Risk • Sensitivity and Scenario Analysis • Simulation • Decision Trees • Real Options in Capital Budgeting
Learning Objectives • Identify the types of capital budgeting decisions. • Show how to calculate the net present value and the internal rate of return, and understand the difference between the two. • Identify different types of cash flows, and explain how they fit into the capital budgeting calculation. • Define the cost of capital, and demonstrate how it is calculated. • Explain the meaning of the capital budgeting model. • Define capital rationing.
Learning Objectives • Define risk and uncertainty. • Describe and calculate various measures of risk, such as the expected value, standard deviation, and coefficient of variation. • Explain the meaning of the risk-adjusted discount rate and certainty equivalents. • Distinguish between sensitivity analysis and scenario analysis. • Describe how to calculate simulations and decision trees. • Explain how real options can improve capital budgeting calculations.
The Capital Budgeting Decision • Capital Budgeting: describes decisions where expenditures and receipts for a particular undertaking will continue over a period of time. • These decisions usually involve outflows of funds in the early periods while the inflows start somewhat later and continue for a significant number of periods.
The Capital Budgeting Decision • Types of capital budgeting decisions – Expansion of facilities – New or improved products – Replacement – Lease or buy – Make or buy – Safety or environmental protection equipment
Time Value of Money • Time Value of Money: a dollar today is worth more than a dollar tomorrow. • To put cash flows originating at different times on an equal basis, we must apply an interest rate to each of the flows so that they are expressed in terms of the same point in time.
Methods of Capital Project Evaluation • Payback: time period (years) necessary to recover the original investment. • Accounting rate of return: percentage resulting from dividing average annual profits by average investment. • Methods that discount cash flows to a present value – Internal rate of return (IRR) – Net present value (NPV)
Methods of Capital Project Evaluation • Net Present Value Formula n
n Rt Ot NPV = ∑ −∑ t t t =1 (1 + k ) t = 0 (1 + k ) • t = time period • n = last period of project • Rt = Cash inflow in period t
• Ot = Cash outflow in period t • k = discount rate (cost of capital)
Methods of Capital Project Evaluation • Discount rate: the interest rate used to evaluate the project. – Also called the cost of capital, hurdle rate, cutoff rate, minimum required rate of return.
• If NPV evaluates to a positive number, the project is financially acceptable. If it is negative, rejection is indicated.
Methods of Capital Project Evaluation • The internal rate of return of a project is the discount rate that causes NPV to equal zero. n n Rt Ot =∑ ∑ t t ( 1 + r ) ( 1 + r ) t =1 t =0 • IRR can be obtained by: – Trial and error with interpolation – Calculation using a business calculator – Calculation using a spreadsheet program
• If the IRR is larger than the cost of capital it signals acceptance. If the IRR is less than the cost of capital the proposed project should be rejected.
Methods of Capital Project Evaluation • For single projects IRR and NPV will give the same results. – NPV > 0, IRR > k – NPV = 0, IRR = k – NPV < 0, IRR < k
• If multiple projects are being considered, IRR and NPV will give the same results if the projects are independent.
– Projects can be implemented simultaneously. – Available funds are not limited. – One project will not affect the cash flow of another.
Methods of Capital Project Evaluation • IRR and NPV methods may yield different results if mutually exclusive projects are analyzed. • This disparity may occur if: – The initial costs of the proposals differ. – The shapes of the cash inflow streams differ.
• Another problem with IRR is nonconventional cash flows.
– Cash outflow, then inflows, then outflows.
• NPV is most recommended measure of a project.
Cash Flows • The analyst’s most difficult task is to enter the best estimates of cash flows into the analysis. • Future timing and amount of cash flows are uncertain. • Data from organizational entities have to be examined for potential bias. – Market forecasts may be biased upward. – Costs are often underestimated.
Cash Flows • All revenue and costs must be stated in terms of cash flows. • All cash flows should be incremental. • Sunk costs do not count. • Any effect on other parts of the operation must be taken into account. • Interest paid on debt is not considered.
Cash Flows • Types of cash flows
– Initial cash outflows: payments that occur at the inception of the project. – Operating cash flows: revenues, costs, and expenses generated by the project. – Additional working capital: inventories, accounts receivable, cash needed for growth that are recovered at the end of the project. – Salvage or resale values: Expected sales value of project machinery at end of project. – Noncash Investment: e.g. use of an existing machine that is not used.
Cost of Capital • To invest in capital projects a company must obtain financing. • Debt – Short-term – Long-term
• Equity – New equity – Retained earnings
Cost of Capital • Cost of debt = r · (1 – t) • r = present interest rate charged for the kind of debt the company would issue • t = tax rate (interest expense is tax deductible)
Cost of Capital • Equity: Retained Earnings
D1 ke = +g P0 • ke = cost of equity capital • D1 = dividend, next period • P0 = current stock price • g = rate at which dividend is expected to grow
Cost of Capital • New Equity
D1 ke = +g P0 (1 − f ) • ke = cost of equity capital • D1 = dividend, next period • P0 = current stock price • g = rate at which dividend is expected to grow • f = flotation costs (as % of P0)
Cost of Capital • Equity: Capital Asset Pricing Model kj = Rf + β(km – Rf) • kj = required rate of return on stock j • Rf = Risk-free rate • km = Rate of return on the market portfolio • β = volatility of a stock’s returns relative to the return on a total stock market portfolio
Cost of Capital • Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC): the average of the cost of debt financing and the cost of equity financing weighted by their proportions in the total capital structure at market values. • There is a point where the combination of components (debt, equity) is optimal and WACC is at a minimum.
The Capital Budgeting Model • Marginal Investment Opportunity curve: a curve representing the internal rate of return on successive doses of investment. • Marginal Cost of Capital: cost of capital required for each additional project, typically rising after the capital budget of a certain size is reached. • Optimal investment budget is where the marginal investment opportunity curve intersects the marginal cost of capital curve.
Capital Rationing • Capital rationing: the practice of restricting capital expenditures to a certain amount, perhaps due to limits on external financing. – Reluctance to incur increasing levels of debt. – Management may not want to add to equity in fear of diluting control.
• Capital rationing does not permit a company to achieve its maximum value.
Risk Versus Uncertainty • Risk refers to a situation in which possible future events can be defined and probabilities assigned. • Probabilities can be: – a priori – obtained by repetition or based on general mathematical principles – statistical – empirical, based on past events
• Uncertainty refers to situations in which there is no viable method of assigning probabilities to future random events.
Sources of Business Risk • Economic conditions • Fluctuations in specific industries • Competition and technological change • Changes in consumer preferences • Costs and expenses – Materials – Services – Labor
The Measures of Risk • Probability: An expression of the chance that a particular event will occur • Probability distribution: describes, in percentage terms, the chances of all possible occurrences • The probabilities of all possible events sum to 1.
The Measures of Risk • Expected value: The average of all possible outcomes weighted by their respective probabilities n
R = ∑ Ri pi i =1
• R = Expected value • pi = probability in case i • n = number of possible outcomes • Ri = value in case i
The Measures of Risk • Standard deviation reflects the variation of possible outcomes from the average. • Calculated as the square root of the weighted average of the squared deviations of all possible outcomes from the expected value. σ=
∑(R − R ) p n
i =1
2
i
i
The Measures of Risk • Based on statistical theory describing the normal curve: – 34% of possible occurrences will be within 1 standard deviation of the mean. – 47.4% will be within 2 standard deviations. – 49.9% will be within 3 standard deviations.
The Measures of Risk • To determine the probability of an event given an normal distribution, find the Z value. • Look up the Z-value in a table to find the appropriate probability. X −R Z= σ
• Z = number of standard deviations from the mean • X = variable (value) in which we are interested
The Measures of Risk • Coefficient of Variation: A measure of risk relative to expected value. • CV is used to compare standard deviations or projects with unequal expected values. R
CV = σ R • σ = standard deviation • R = expected value
Capital Budgeting under Conditions of Risk To incorporate risk into a capital budgeting problem: 1. Calculate expected NPV 2. Calculate the standard deviation of NPV
Capital Budgeting under Conditions of Risk • Net Present Value of expected values n
Rt NP V = ∑ − O0 t t =1 (1 + r f ) • NPV = Expected net present value • O0 = initial investment • rf = risk-free interest rate • Rt = expected value of annual cash flows
Capital Budgeting under Conditions of Risk • Standard Deviation of the present value
σ t2 σ= ∑ 2t i =1 (1 + r f ) n
• σ = standard deviation of NPV • σt = standard deviation of cash flow in period t
Two Other Methods for Incorporating Risk • Risk-Adjusted Discount Rate (RADR): the risk adjustment is made in the denominator of the present-value calculation. K = rf + RP • K = risk adjusted discount rate • rf = risk-free rate (short-term U.S. Treasury securities) • RP = risk premium •
Two Other Methods for Incorporating Risk • Certainty Equivalent: a certain (risk-free) cash flow that would be acceptable as opposed to the expected value of a risky cash flow. • With the Certainty Equivalent method, the risk adjustment is made in the numerator of the present-value calculation.
Sensitivity and Scenario Analysis • Sensitivity Analysis: A method for estimating project risk that involves changing a key variable to evaluate the impact the change will have on the results. • Scenario Analysis: similar to sensitivity analysis, but takes into consideration the changes of several important variables simultaneously.
Simulation • Simulation Analysis: A method for estimating project risk that assigns a probability distribution to each of the key variables. • Uses random numbers to simulate a set of possible outcomes to arrive at an expected value and dispersion.
Simulation • Assign probability distributions to each of the key variables. • Generate a random number for each of the key variables. • Calculate NPV based on the assigned probability distribution and the random numbers generated. • Repeat a large number of times (1000 or more). • Use the trials to form a frequency distribution of NPVx. • Calculate a standard deviation and Z-statistic.
Decision Trees • Decision tree: a method for evaluating project risk used with sequential decision making in which a diagram points out graphically the order in which decisions must be made and compares the value of the various actions that can be undertaken. • Decision points are designated with squares on a decision tree. • Chance events are designated with circles and are assigned certain probabilities.
Decision Trees • Set up all the branches of the decision tree. • Move back from right to left, calculating the expected value of each branch. Where appropriate, combine or eliminate branches. • Eliminate branches corresponding to poor decisions. • Compare the net expected value of the final remaining alternatives to arrive at a solution.
Real Options in Capital Budgeting • Real Option: An opportunity to make changes in some aspects of the project while it is in progress or to make adjustments even before the project is started. • Value of the project = NPV + option value
Real Options in Capital Budgeting • Forms of real options: – Option to vary output – Option to vary inputs – flexibility – Option to abandon – Option to postpone – Option to introduce future products