On and Onanism By Neil Mulholland Fields: Onanalysis, Onanology. Aim: To investigate wanking as a post-Gramscian critique of hegemony and anomie through the development and implementation of onanology. Objectives: 8S HI½RI ERH GVMXMGEPP] ETTVEMWI XLI ½IPH HI½RIH XLVSYKL XLI TVEGXMGI SJ [EROMRK [MXLMR GSRXIQTSVEV] EREP]WMW SJ XLI QYPXMJEGIXIH ½IPH SJ GSRXIQTSVEV] WYFGYPXYVI HIZMERGI and retreatism. To identify and critically appraise historical precedents for wanking as an exemplar of the decentred-self deterritorialising the normative while Cornwalising social control and deviance via the narcissistic and performative QSHIW SJ WMQYPEXMSR RS[ GSQQSRP] I\IQTPM½IH MR VEHMGEP SRERMWQ To investigate and critically appraise the work of contemporary onanalists by whom wanking is made an explicit practice within their onanalysis. 8S MRZIWXMKEXI [LIXLIV XLI HI½RMXMSR SJ WYGL E ½IPH MW GSLIVIRX ERH meaningful to onanalists and wankers. To identify wanking outside of the frame which contributes to wanking inside the frame. To develop, implement and evaluate an onanology through which new wanking is produced as part of the research process. -HIRXMJ] STTSVXYRMXMIW JSV JYVXLIV VIWIEVGL )YVSW [MXLMR XLI ½IPH Assumptions: The project, therefore, is based on the following assumptions: 8LEX [EROMRK MW E XIGLRMGEP HI½RMXMSR XLEX MW MX HIWGVMFIW E KIRIVMG XIGLRMGEP TVSGIWW 8LEX XLIVI MW E ½IPH XLEX GER FI HI½RIH XIGLRMGEPP] ERH XLEX SREREPMWXW [MXLMR XLMW ½IPH GER FI GEPPIH ³[EROMRK onanalists’. 8LEX [EROMRK MW SV LEW FIIR E QIXLSH ERH E ½IPH SJ WXYH] XEOIW MXW TPEGI MR XLI GERSR SJ GVMXMGEP XLISV] ERH LEW E TEVXMGYPEV WXEXYW GSRJIVVIH YTSR MX XLEX XLMW WXEXYW MW EP[E]W HI½RIH EW ERXM LMIVEVGLMGEP IQFIHHIH TVSHYGXMZI oppositional and so on. That wanking, theorised in these ways, has had an impact on wanking in contemporary onanalysis. 8LEX XLIVI EVI STTSVXYRMXMIW JSV JYVXLIV VIWIEVGL )YVSW [MXLMR XLI ½IPH Subsequent questions and considerations *VSQ XLIWI EWWYQTXMSRW MX MW TSWWMFPI XS FIKMR XS QEOI ER IRUYMV] SJ XLI ½IPH ERH XS MHIRXMJ] XLI JSPPS[MRK PSRK term objectives:
the drouth
77
Long-term objectives: In what way is the term ‘wanking onanalist’ a useful description of a form of onanographic practice, and in which [E]W HSIW MX VIPEXI XS SXLIV JSVQW SJ GSRXIQTSVEV] SRERSKVETL]# -W XLIVI EPVIEH] E GSQQYRMX] SJ ³[EROMRK SREREPMWXW´ XLEX MHIRXMJ] XLIQWIPZIW EW WYGL# ,S[ HS ³SREREPMWXW XLEX [ERO´ HI½RI XLIQWIPZIW MR VIPEXMSR XS SXLIV SRERSKVETLMG TVEGXMGIW# -W XLI XIGLRMGEP HI½RMXMSR SJ ³[EROMRK SREREPMWX´ E YWIJYP HI½RMXMSR SV GEXIKSV]# -R [LEX [E]W GER XLI XIGLRMGEP HI½RMXMSR SJ [EROMRK FI TVSFPIQEXMWIH IK HS GEXIKSVMIW SJ ³RSVQEPG]´ EHSTXIH by onanist interest groups disallow hybrid subjects like pro-onanist, non-wanking onanalists and anti-onanalysis SRERMWXW # ;LEX EVI XLI TSMRXW SJ VIJIVIRGI SYXWMHI SJ XLI ½IPH SJ SRERSKVETL] QEHI F] ³[EROMRK SREREPMWXW´# Some thoughts on so-called ‘onanological’ practices and their relation to wanking onanographic practices. ,S[ QER] JYVXLIV VIWIEVGL )YVSW EVI XLIVI [MXLMR XLI ½IPH XLEX LEZI RSX EPVIEH] FIIR GSQQMXXIH XS XLI GSRZIRXMSREP ½IPH SJ SRERSPSK]#
78
the drouth