Writing in and across Disciplines
OPERATIONALIZING EPISTEMIC PRACTICES: NEGOTIATING THE TEXTUAL FORMATION OF ISSUES OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT
AnnMarie Eriksson
Division for Language and Communication, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden and The Linneus Centre for Research on Learning, Interaction and Mediated Communication in Contemporary Society, University of Gothenburg, Sweden
The special position academic writing assignments hold as a means for introducing university students to disciplinary discourses foregrounds text production as a form of knowledge development. For instance, while writing a report on issues of sustainable development exemplifies a demanding textual process, it also implies participating in epistemic practices grounded in disciplinary traditions. Such practices are challenging for student writers and therefore need to be made concrete and operational. What types of concerns emerge and require attention as students begin operating in disciplinary fields? How can access points to epistemic practices be provided by means of producing text? This presentation aims at synthesizing and reporting results from three interactionanalytical studies where these questions were investigated empirically in the setting of engineering education. The results from analyses of 33 video recorded supervision sessions around emerging report documents, produced by 14 Master degree students, show a series of challenges at different points in the text production process: at the initial stages of formulating an outline for the reports; as previous knowledge was transformed and situated for the students’ own writing assignments; and, whilst grounding and crafting conclusions in alignment with traditions of the particular field. It was found that access points often consisted in negotiating alternative ways of formulating text and in testing alternative solutions to specific, textual problems. This presentation will show how dealing with concrete textual formulations together with someone more experienced provided valuable points of entry to epistemic practices.
References
Eriksson, AnnMarie. (2014). Formulating knowledge: engaging with issues of sustainable development through academic writing in engineering education. (PhD), University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg Studies in Educational Sciences 357. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/2077/36885
Mäkitalo, Åsa. (2012). Professional learning and the materiality of social practice. Journal of Education and Work, 25 (1), 5978. doi: 10.1080/13639080.2012.644905
Mäkitalo, Åsa, Jakobsson, Anders, & Säljö, Roger. (2009). Learning to reason in the context of socioscientific problems. exploring the demands on students in'new'classroom activites. In K Kumpalainen, C HmeloSilver & M Cesar (Eds.), Investigating classroom interaction: Methodologies in action (pp. 726). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Prior, Paul. (1998). Writing/Disciplinarity: a sociohistoric account of literate activity in the academy . New York, NY: Routledge.
Prior, Paul. (2006). A sociocultural theory of writing. In C.A. MacArthur, S. Graham & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp. 5466). New York, NY: Guilford Press.