thecourier courier
Monday 7 May 2018 Issue 1369 Free
thecourieronline.co.uk
Comment Scrutinising the wealth and privilege in British media Page 8
Lifestyle Body positivity: battling societal expectations Page 15
Music Looking back to your first live music encounters Page 22
The independent voice of Newcastle students
Est 1948
Housing policy sparks local election debate City Council aims to create ‘balanced communities’ NUSU President accused of ‘scaremongering’ James Sproston Editor Thousands of students took to the ballot box last week amid debate over housing policy in student residential areas. A Newcastle City Council policy that has been scrutinised by student representatives was the centre of attention going into polling day, with Newcastle University Students’ Union President Ronnie Reid writing an article that claimed that the Council has been “silently trying to put in place policies which will stop students living in sociable and affordable housing.” The article has been considered inherently political by some students, who believe the piece to be critical of the Labour-controlled City Council, after Reid encouraged the student body to vote in the upcoming elections at the end of the piece. However, the process of incentivising the construction of purpose built student accommodation (PBSAs) and the conversion of empty houses in multiple occupation (HMOs) into family dwellings to ‘rebalance communities’ outlined by Reid has been a City Council policy since 2007, when the Council was controlled by the Liberal Democrats. In early April, Ronnie Reid wrote and publicised an article on NUSU’s website with the headline ‘They want you out, we want you in!’, detailing the Union’s stance on a housing policy document produced by Newcastle City Council. Reid’s qualms were with the description of students as a “transient community” that impact on the community through “increased crime” as well as a “fear of crime” and “anti-social behavior, noise and nuisance” in the Maintaining Sustainable Communities policy document, written by the City Council. Reid considered these descriptions to be an unfair image of students. His stance was swiftly followed by an article of similar tone in The Tab, though both articles are no longer available. Though Reid’s view was echoed by a number of students, he faced a backlash from a portion of the student community, with some branding his views as “ill-informed scaremongering” and “complete fabrication.”
Many took issue with the timing of Reid’s article, just weeks before the May 2018 local elections. The article encouraged students to register to vote, prompting comments on the NUSU President’s Facebook post that referred to the article as “blatant anti-Newcastle City Council propaganda.” Reid justified this by telling The Chronicle that the campaign was “about getting students to register and using a student facing policy to engage them,” adding: “The first paragraph of my article does encourage students to read the policy for themselves so they can make their own minds up.” Newcastle University Labour Society refuted this, claiming: “Either Reid does not understand the policy or he’s trying to discredit our Labourled council ahead of the local elections (a clear abuse of his power), or, more likely, both. Either way, students will see through it, Newcastle hasn’t had a Tory councillor in 23 years and that’s not about to change because of some amateurish scaremongering.”
The process has been a City Council policy since 2007, when the Council was controlled by the Liberal Democrats Three weeks prior, Reid was interviewed by Newcastle Student Radio for a news piece that opened saying: “Newcastle City Council wants to move students out of Jesmond and Heaton, and into purpose built student accommodation in the city centre.” Reid shared the video on his Union Facebook page, within which he expressed concern that some students would be priced out of student residential areas. Issue has also been taken with the factual accuracy of Reid’s article, specifically around his interpretation of the development of HMOs. Reid’s assertion that the Council “plans to incentivise landlords to transition properties from student housing to family dwellings” has been considered problematic. According to the document, the grant funding of £2,000 to £10,000 will only be accessible to small landlords whose properties have “remained empty for long periods” to bring the property up to the Newcastle Accreditation Standard. However, there is little doubt that this funding is accessible for the purpose of converting student-orientated HMO
properties “back to family accommodation,” with the document stating that this process will be monitored to “ensure appropriate assistance is made available to realise the potential of the existing housing stock to create sustainable communities.” Whilst this seems to propose that HMOs will be taken out of the housing market, a Newcastle City Council spokesperson said: “The policy does not seek to reduce houses of multiple occupation, but instead control the loss of further family housing to student accommodation in the interests of the wider community.” The City Council have defended the intention of the policy: “The purpose of the Maintaining Sustainable Communities policy is to create balanced communities where there is a good range of housing, access to jobs and services that meet the needs of our communities.” Though blame for the policy has fallen at the feet of the City Council, controlled by Labour before and after the May 2018 local elections, another Council document (the Interim Planning Guidance on Purpose Built Student Housing) introduced the process in November 2007. In the document, the then Liberal Democrat-controlled City Council proposed: “Alongside encouraging the development of purpose built student accommodation, the Council is seeking to discourage the conversion of family houses into flats or houses in multiple occupation.” Whilst it recognises that students bring “prestige and recognition”, “increased spending in the local economy”, and “investment into older properties that would potentially otherwise be in decline”, the framework advises the building of PBSAs to avoid “anti–social behaviour and marginalisation of long standing communities”. It is in this local development framework that the idea of ‘balance’ in communities is first raised, and this is carried through to the current policy. The 2007 document encourages a process of ‘destudentification’, and claims that the higher cost of PBSAs is offset by fewer transportation costs by virtue of living in the city centre, even though many students commute on foot to university. 37 potential sites for PBSAs are identified, with a total estimated capacity of 13,604-16,420 students. On this list there are several sites that now host PBSAs, whilst several others are currently under construction, such as ‘Richardson Road Halls of Residence’ and ‘Newgate Shopping Centre’. continued on page 5
Discover Indonesia Week: Cultural festival hits campus p5 Inside today >>>
Uni poverty premium
Wellbeing and welfare
A new report reveals the hidden costs faced by working class students at university News, page 3
Welfare and Equality Officer Sarah Craggs talks wellbeing fairs, doggy days and inspiring women Voice, page 10
Cruising on canals
Criminally famous
It’s certainly different, but Maddy Bainbridge reckons canal holidays are the next big thing Travel, page 20
Is it time we had a rethink about the way we treat celebrities who break the law? TV, page 25
More than a pretty face
Next stop, Kilimanjaro
The mental and physical health benefits of keeping pets has now been scientifically proven Science, page 32
Cycling the length of Britain was just phase one of Newcastle student’s charity challenge Sport, page 37