DECEMBER ‘14
Interview with
Dave Ryder
CEO of Prototron
Beating the Odds: How
PROTOTRON Endured the
Offshoring Movement
Recycling PCBs Advantages of Leadless Packaging
Join Today
eeweb.com/register
c a P c LogiModern Printed Circuits em NXP S ted by
ctors icondu
CONTENTS
u Contrib
, dured ng nt.
B
y 1987, Dave Ryder had worked with a number of board shops in his native Seattle area. During
that time, he had risen from the plating department to general management— but he still wasn’t satisfied. He was not happy with the way things were run or with the way the customers were treated. He effectively saw how not to run a board shop, so he decided to do something about it: he started Prototron Circuits. Prototron is one of those rare companies
es -growing ican ase,
a customer-driven focus. Their credo is “service the customer and the business will grow.” Over the past twenty-eight
years they have become one of the industry leaders when it comes to quick-
ing ay. ous Metals Part 2
rol Hook
le,
Switching to Leadless Logic Big Advantages Over Surface-mount Packages
TECH REPORT New Liquid Crystal Polymer Enables High-speed Circuit Fabrication
INDUSTRY INTERVIEW Why “America’s Board Shop” is Here to Stay Interview with Prototron’s Dave Ryder
Washington and the other in Tucson, Arizona—are made up of individuals with
from Ashes ”
ging Circuits
TECH REPORT
CONTENTS
4 12 14
that pride itself on always doing what is right for the customer. The company’s two divisions—one in Redmond,
turn prototype printed circuit boards. They pride themselves on having the best quality and delivery performance in
the business. EEWeb recently spoke with Prototron’s co-founder and President,
der nt of Prototron ontributing Writer
.” W ite “yes to a defin is r kages e c sw gic pa , lo The an ll a m mance perfor ultra-s l s a u ic io n r va e mecha re som te their there a t evalua a h h using t it t ted w nd tha ia u c o o f s s d a an tages t advan ages. distinc ic pack s plast s le d a le
Dave Ryder, about what led him to start Prototron, where they are today, and what he thinks is the single most
TECH SERIES PCBs Rise from the Ashes: Part 2 Salvaging Precious Metals
24
important factor to insure the successful
In the previous article,future “PCBs Rise from Ashes,” in North America. of the industry methods and processes behind the recycling
of PCBs and components were explored. This installment takes a look at the recovered
materials themselves—the rare earth elements, along with precious metals.
Pg. 14
3
Modern Printed Circuits
The Advantages of Switching to
LEADLESS Logic Packages Contributed by NXP Semiconductors
4
TECH REPORT
I
n the mobile, portable, and wearable markets, board space is always at a premium. Designers are constantly being asked to add functionality while using less PCB area and lowering overall cost. Surface-mount packages, with their small footprints and low profiles, can seem like a good choice for tight spaces—but how durable are they? Can something that small really hold up? The answer is a definite “yes.� We tested various ultra-small logic packages to evaluate their mechanical performance, and found that that there are some distinct advantages associated with using leadless plastic packages.
5
board and have a higher solderability rating.
Modern Printed Circuits
The first step in calculating solderability is to determine the package footprint, which is the area within the combined perimeter of the leads and the plastic body. Typically the width times the length. Table 3 gives these numbers for each sample. Table 3. Comparative footprints Sample
Package
No. of contacts
Sample G
A
5-pin leaded Leadless MicroPak
B
2 Pad area = 0.040 mm6 Leadless MicroPak
C
Leaded
(0.5 mm pitch)
6
Dimensions (W x L x H mm)
Sample A
Pitch (mm)
Total area (mm2)
leadless 1.456-pin x 1.0 x 0.5MicroPak 0.5 (0.5 mm pitch)
Total contact area = 0.20 mm
2
5
= 0.065 mm2 0.35 1.0 xPad 1.0area x 0.5 2 Total contact area = 0.39 mm
1.6 x 1.6 x 0.6
Sample E 5-pin 1.45leadless WCSP (0.5 mm pitch) Pad area = 0.040 mm2 1.00 Total contact area = 0.20 mm2
0.5
Figure 3. Solderable area of leaded, leadless MicroPak, and leadless WCSP packages
2.56
Leaded 6 1.6 x 1.6 x 0.6 Harder 0.5to Dislodge 2.56 Stronger Bonds To begin with, leadless bond with the The DQFN package, which5packages is a leadless the TSSOP, has a 1.26 similar advantage in board that E Leadless WCSP 1.4 perform xalternative 0.9 x 0.5 toCreating 0.5 a stronger in terms of mechanical adherence in better mechanical performance, isbetter uses pads, and not leads, to create a larger contactresults area. The DQFN goes a step further, by F Leaded 5 1.6 x 1.6 x 0.6 0.5 2.56 to theaPCB. This is because leadlesseven more contact too. That’s because, adding center bond pad that provides with the PCB. despite their tiny G Leaded 5 not 1.6 x 1.6 0.5 leadless 2.56packages are harder to packages use metal pads, leads, as x 0.55 footprints, theIncreased external connection device dislodge the PCB using an external III. bonding resistance dislocation forces H Leaded 5 for 1.0 x pins. 1.0to x 0.48 0.35from 1.00 Creating a stronger bondpackages with the board results in better mechanical performance. Thiscombined means The pads on leadless present force. A stronger solder bond, that, despite their tiny footprints, leadless packages are harder to dislodge from the PCB a larger contact area to the PCB. Solder with a smaller footprint, also helps leadless using andoes external Having a strong connection can the also help improve electrical Figure 1 charts these footprints. Samples C, D, F, solder and G, which are 5- and 6-pin paste notforce. adhere to the package packages perform better in leaded four-point 2 performance. itself, butpitch only to of the pad tests. The packages enable a greater packages with a standard ofthe 0.5surface mm, have the biggestbend footprints, measuring 2.56 mm so having a larger area degree of curvature in theof board each. Next in line or arelead, Sample A, the 6-pinsurface leadless MicroPak package with a pitch 0.5 before mm, the Two test methodologies commonly used to evaluate the effectiveness of a mechanical bond are for the solder paste to bond with creates package connection fails. Having a stronger 2 with a footprint ofreferred 1.45 mm ,“Pull” and and Sample E,tests. the 5-pin leadless WCSP package, with performance a footprint to as “Shear” The results included below indicate superior a stronger attachment to the board. solder connection can also help improve leadless packages of 1.26 mm2 also of with a pad pitch in ofboth 0.5 these mm.tests. Samples B and H, the two packagessince withbetter a pitch electrical performance, “ground 2 of 0.35 mm, have a footprint of just 1.00 mm . Using a narrow pitchratings of 0.35 mminshrinks the bounce” result lower noise. D
The leadless advantage in pull tests The pull test measures how much force is required to dislodge the package from the board. The packages were tested with a Zwick 1464 tensile machine. Figure 4 shows the direction of the
footprint whether the packages uses leads or pads.
stress, away from the board. Tablefootprint 5 lists the(total test results, Comparative area inwhile mm2)Figure 5 charts the data. Pull force is given in Newtons.
3.00 2.50
D
C
F
G
2.00
Pull
1.50
A 1.00
E H
B
Package
0.50 0 Sample A 6-pin leadless MicroPak (0.5 mm pitch)
Sample B 6-pin leadless MicroPak (0.35 mm pitch)
Sample C 5-pin leaded (0.5 mm pitch)
Sample D PCB
6-pin leaded (0.5 mm pitch)
Sample E 5-pin leadless WCSP (0.5 mm pitch)
Sample F 5-pin leaded (0.5 mm pitch)
Sample G 5-pin leaded (0.5 mm pitch)
Sample H 5-pin leaded (0.35 mm pitch)
Figure 4. Pull test
Figure 1. Comparative footprint (total area in mm2)
6
The next step in calculating solderability is to compare the footprint to the total contact area. The total contact area is the number of contacts multiplied by the area of each contact. For
package types: a 6-pin leadless MicroPak package with a footprint of 1.0 x 1.0 mm and a pad pitch of 0.35 mm, and a 28-pin HVQFN with a footprint of 4.0 x 4.0 mm and a pad pitch of 0.5 mm.
TECH REPORT
Figure 8 shows the test setup. The boards, populated with nine packages each, were tested facing down. The test involved four points of cyclic at 1 solder cycle perpaste second, “Having a larger surface areabend for the towith a support span of 110 mm andwith a loadcreates span of 75 mm. The JEDEC standard to J-STD requires a bond a stronger attachment the22B113 board.� minimum of 200k cycles with less than 60 percent failures. area versus total area (solderability) for each sample, and Figure 2 graphs the solderability ratings. Load span
Table 4. Comparison of total area with total contact area, yielding solderability Sample
Package
No. of contacts
A
Leadless MicroPak
6
B
Leadless MicroPak
6
C
Leaded
5
Leaded
Moveable 6 anvil
5
D
Printed wiring board Dimensions Pitch (W x L x H mm) (mm)
IC packages
1.45 x 1.0 x 0.5
Total area (mm2)
Total contact area (mm2)
Total contact vs. total area
0.5
1.45
0.39
26.9%
1.0 x 1.0 x 0.5
0.35
1.00
0.30
29.8%
1.6 x 1.6 x 0.6
0.5
2.56
0.22
8.6%
1.6 x 1.6 x 0.6
0.5
Moveable 2.56 anvil
0.26
10.3%
1.4 x 0.9 x 0.5
0.5
1.26
0.20
Support span
Leadless WCSP Fixed anvil
E
15.8% Fixed anvil
F
Leaded
5
1.6 x 1.6 x 0.6
0.5
2.56
0.30
11.7%
G
Leaded
5
1.6 x 1.6 x 0.55
0.5
2.56
0.20
7.8%
H
Leaded
5
1.0 x 1.0 x 0.48
0.35
1.00
0.19
18.7%
Figure 8. Board-level bend test
A 2.0 mm deflection was applied to boards assembled with the leadless MicroPak. There were Solderability = total contact area versus total area no failures found after 1,000k cycles of testing. And analysis of the test samples and PCB traces 30% B showed that Athe thinner solder lines of the 0.35 mm pitch held up, with no visible joint fatigue 25% 20%
H 15%
E
NXP White Paper
9 F
10%
C
D
G
5% 0 Sample A 6-pin leadless MicroPak (0.5 mm pitch)
Sample B 6-pin leadless MicroPak (0.35 mm pitch)
Sample C 5-pin leaded (0.5 mm pitch)
Sample D 6-pin leaded (0.5 mm pitch)
Sample E 5-pin leadless WCSP (0.5 mm pitch)
Sample F 5-pin leaded (0.5 mm pitch)
Sample G 5-pin leaded (0.5 mm pitch)
Sample H 5-pin leaded (0.35 mm pitch)
Figure 2. Comparative solderability
Samples B and H, the two packages with a narrow pitch of 0.35 mm, have the same footprint, but Sample B, the leadless MicroPak, has a much greater contact area, making the solderability
7
Modern Printed Circuits
The Widest Selection
Recommended Replacements for Leaded Packages
NXP is the world’s number-one volume supplier of logic and offers the industry’s largest portfolio of logic functions in the smallest packages. That includes more than 50 leadless packages, all qualified for use in automotive-grade environments. NXP’s leadless DQFN,ofMicroPak, Table 5. Results pull testand Diamond packages offer smallest-inSample Package No. of class footprints and can successfully contacts replace bigger, leaded packages like Leadless TSSOP A and PicoGate while delivering 6 the MicroPak added benefits of improved mechanical Leadless performance, simpler assembly, and B 6 MicroPak lower overall cost. Leadless plastic packages the extra advantage C offer Leaded 5 of lowering risk, too, since pin-compatible D Leaded 6 versions can be used to secondLeadless source larger leaded packages. E 5 WCSP
Leaded package
Leadless equivalent
Space savings
Best for functions of
TSSOP
DQFN
Up to 76% smaller
10+ pins
PicoGate
MicroPak
Up to 62% smaller
6 to 10 pins
Diamond
25% smaller than smallest MicroPak (XSON6)
5 pins
Dimensions (W x L x H mm)
Pitch (mm)
Pull force (N)
the Details 0.5 1.45Get x 1.0 x 0.5 23.0 Our white paper, titled “Save space and improve mechanical performance by moving your logic solutions 1.0 x 1.0 x 0.5 0.35 15.0 from leaded to leadless packages,” summarizes the results ourxcomparison tests the three leadless 1.6 of x 1.6 0.6 0.5 and introduces 14.0 formats we recommend for logic – DQFN, MicroPak, 1.6 x 1.6 x 0.6 0.5 15.0 and Diamond. To download the white paper please visit: 1.4 http://www.nxp.com/campaigns/logic-packaging/ x 0.9 x 0.5 0.5 4.7
Sample G 5-pin leaded (0.5 mm pitch) Pad area = 0.040 mm2 Total contact area = 0.20 mm2
Sample A 6-pin leadless MicroPak (0.5 mm pitch) Pad area = 0.065 mm2 Total contact area = 0.39 mm2
Tota
Figure 3. Solderable area of leaded, leadless MicroPak, and leadless WCSP packages
The DQFN package, which is a leadless alternative to the TSSOP, has a is uses pads, and not leads, to create a larger contact area. The DQFN adding a center bond pad that provides even more contact with the P
III. Increased bonding resistance to dislocation force
F
Leaded
5
1.6 x 1.6 x 0.6
0.5
16.0
G
Leaded
5
1.6 x 1.6 x 0.55
0.5
13.0
H
Leaded
5
1.0 x 1.0 x 0.48
0.35
6.6
Creating a stronger bond with the board results in better mechanical p that, despite their tiny footprints, leadless packages are harder to dislo using an external force. Having a strong solder connection can also he performance.
Two test methodologies commonly used to evaluate the effectiveness referred to as “Pull” and “Shear” tests. The results included below ind of leadless packages in both these tests.
The leadless advantage in pull tests The pull test measures how much force is required to dislodge the pac packages were tested with a Zwick 1464 tensile machine. Figure 4 sho stress, away from the board. Table 5 lists the test results, while Figure 5 is given in Newtons.
Pull force (Newtons) 25
Pull
A
Package
20
PCB
Figure 4. Pull test
15
B
C
F
D
G NXP White Paper
10 E
5
H
0 Sample A 6-pin leadless MicroPak (0.5 mm pitch)
Sample B 6-pin leadless MicroPak (0.35 mm pitch)
Sample C 5-pin leaded (0.5 mm pitch)
Sample D 6-pin leaded (0.5 mm pitch)
Sample E 5-pin leadless WCSP (0.5 mm pitch)
Sample F 5-pin leaded (0.5 mm pitch)
Sample G 5-pin leaded (0.5 mm pitch)
Sample H 5-pin leaded (0.35 mm pitch)
Figure 5. Results of pull test
Samples A and B, the two leadless MicroPak packages, withstood the greatest pull force. The
8
larger pads and contact area of the MicroPak package increases its resistance to being dislodged
Sample E 5-pin leadless WCSP (0.5 mm pitch) Pad area = 0.040 mm2 al contact area = 0.20 mm2
TECH REPORT PCB printing profile using a 125 µm stencil
Shear
PCB
“Leadless plastic packages offer the extra Figure 6. Shear test advantage of Table 6. Results of shear test lowering risk, Solder paste applied to both Solder paste applied to the Solder paste applied to the package landing padsPackage on the leadless package pads leaded package landing Sample No. of landing Dimensions Pitch padsShear force too, since dual-footprint layout. on the dual-footprint layout. dual-footprint layout. contacts (W x L xon H the mm) (mm) (N) pin-compatible Leadless A 6 1.45 x 1.0 x 0.5 0.5 18.0 MicroPak versions can Leadless be used to B 6 1.0 x 1.0 x 0.5 0.35 19.0 MicroPak second-source C Leaded 5 1.6 x 1.6 x 0.6 0.5 13.0 larger leaded D Leaded 6 1.6 x 1.6 x 0.6 0.5 15.0 packages.” Leadless Solder under component No solder under component E 5 1.4 x 0.9 x 0.5 0.5 5.5
a similar advantage in that N goes a step further, by PCB.
es
Package
WCSP
Leaded package after re-flow with solder paste applied to both landing pads, leaded F Leaded and leadless.
performance. This means odge from the PCB elp improve electrical
of a mechanical bond are dicate superior performance
ckage from the board. The ows the direction of the 5 charts the data. Pull force
5
Leaded package without solder paste applied under the leaded package, no solder bleeding.
1.6 x 1.6 x 0.6
0.5
17.0
G
Leaded
5
1.6 x 1.6 x 0.55
0.5
12.0
H
Leaded
5
1.0 x 1.0 x 0.48
0.35
6.6
Shear force (Newtons) 20 A
B
Shear
Package
F
15
PCB
D Figure 6. Shear test
C
G
10
Table 6. Results of shear test Sample
6
5
E
0 Sample A 6-pin leadless MicroPak (0.5 mm pitch)
Sample B 6-pin leadless MicroPak (0.35 mm pitch)
Sample C 5-pin leaded (0.5 mm pitch)
Sample D 6-pin leaded (0.5 mm pitch)
Sample E 5-pin leadless WCSP (0.5 mm pitch)
Sample F 5-pin leaded (0.5 mm pitch)
Sample G 20 5-pin leaded 15 (0.5 mm pitch)
Package
No. of contacts
Dimensions (W x L x H mm)
A
Leadless MicroPak
B
Leadless MicroPak
6
1.0 x 1.0 x 0.5
C
Leaded
5
1.6 x 1.6 x 0.6
H
6
1.45 x 1.0 x 0.5
D
Leaded
6
1.6 x 1.6 x 0.6
E
Leadless WCSP
5
1.4 x 0.9 x 0.5
F
Leaded
5
1.6 x 1.6 x 0.6
G
Leaded
5
1.6 x 1.6 x 0.55
H
Leaded
5
1.0 x 1.0 x 0.48
Sample H 5-pin B A leaded (0.35 mm pitch)
Shear force (Ne
D
C
10
Figure 7. Results of shear test
5
0 Sample A 6-pin leadless MicroPak (0.5 mm pitch)
Sample B 6-pin leadless MicroPak (0.35 mm pitch)
Sample C 5-pin leaded (0.5 mm pitch)
Samples A and B, the two leadless MicroPak packages, showed the best performance. The superior solder bond, enabled by the larger pad size and larger contact area, gives the MicroPak9
Sample D 6-pin leaded (0.5 mm pitch)
5-
(0.
Figure 7. Results of shear test
Samples A and B, the two leadless MicroPak package
Your Circuit Starts Here. Sign up to design, share, and collaborate on your next project—big or small.
Click Here to Sign Up
Modern Printed Circuits
New Liquid Crystal Polymer Enables
HIGH-SPEED CIRCUIT Fabrication
By James Rathburn, HSIO Technologies Limitations of Conventional Existing Technology In many ways, the printed circuit industry has been driven by the mobile and handset market to achieve finer lines and spaces with higher density. The domestic circuit market has adopted laser direct imaging systems and laser drilled microvias over the last several years as advancements in fabrication techniques. In general, domestic suppliers can supply 75-micron lines and spaces with multi-layer construction, with the availability of 50-micron lines and spaces in some cases. The supplier pool is dramatically reduced below 50-micron lines and spaces, with blind and buried vias likely required. Material sets available to traditional fabrication combined with the line and space capabilities drive the overall stack up for impedance control.
12
For high speed applications, loss associated with glass weave and solder mask are an issue, and conventional via technology has become a major source of impedance mismatch and signal parasitic effects. In general, signal integrity, high aspect ratio vias and line and space requirements limit the relationship between semiconductor packaging and the printed circuit board the chips are mounted to. Whether the application is a multi-layer rigid PCB, a flex circuit, or rigid flex there is a need for a high-speed, high-density alternative. The domestic printed circuit industry is reluctant to invest significant capital to advance capabilities in many cases due to relatively low margins and off shore competition for commodity production.
TECH REPORT
HSIO Philosophy and Technology Development HSIO has taken the approach that there is no need for another supplier that replicates the existing capabilities and infrastructure. A list of key customers was interviewed and asked what capabilities are needed for future circuit requirements. The common theme was finer lines and spaces, higher routing densities and signal integrity improvements. HSIO did not have a legacy manufacturing facility with capital invested in infrastructure to produce existing technology, and the focus was to create a new way of creating circuits that leverages existing techniques to make it easy for suppliers to adopt production. Key parameters are: • Lines and spaces below 50-micron multi-layer, high-density interconnect • Signal integrity beyond 40GHz • Material sets that can be processed with conventional means • Via construction with improvements over conventional barrel plated or micro vias
The development focus was directed at starting with an improvement in material used to build the circuit stack. Liquid Crystal Polymer is used widely in the connector industry, which is another area of HSIO expertise, but mostly in an injection molded construction. LCP has been used in the flexible circuit industry as an alternative to Polyimid or Kapton with limited experience. HSIO focused on creating a circuit architecture that uses LCP material in ways that can be processed with the same equipment used to produce conventional circuits, as well as the laser system HSIO uses to produce connector and socket products. LCP has properties that make it ideal for high-speed circuit fabrication. The following article provides an overview of the LCP circuit fabrication process with the philosophy of a technology building block or tool box approach. Visit EEWeb.com to read the full article—by clicking the image below:
• Application capability for rigid, flexible and rigid flex and semiconductor packaging • System level approach to improving the signal channel considering more than just the PCB • Production capability for small, medium, and large volume • Format capability for small, medium, and large size circuit assemblies
13
Modern Printed Circuits
For over twenty years, Prototron has endured the offshoring movement. Now, with two facilities and an ever-growing North American customer base, “America’s Board Shop” is here to stay. Interview with Dave Ryder Co-founder and President of Prototron Prototon photography by Carol Hook
14
INDUSTRY INTERVIEW
B
y 1987, Dave Ryder had worked with a number of board shops in his native Seattle area. During that time, he had risen from the plating department to general management— but he still wasn’t satisfied. He was not happy with the way things were run or with the way the customers were treated. He effectively saw how not to run a board shop, so he decided to do something about it: he started Prototron Circuits. Prototron is one of those rare companies that pride itself on always doing what is right for the customer. The company’s two divisions—one in Redmond, Washington and the other in Tucson, Arizona—are made up of individuals with a customer-driven focus. Their credo is “service the customer and the business will grow.” Over the past twenty-eight years they have become one of the industry leaders when it comes to quickturn prototype printed circuit boards. They pride themselves on having the best quality and delivery performance in the business. EEWeb recently spoke with Prototron’s co-founder and President, Dave Ryder, about what led him to start Prototron, where they are today, and what he thinks is the single most important factor to insure the successful future of the industry in North America.
15
Modern Printed Circuits
Prototron is a quick-turn prototype shop—was that always the case?
“We have always been a prototype shop and we have always built with production quality as our goal— it has never been a trialand-error scenario.”
Yes, absolutely. I knew that this was the way to go from the start. During my ten years of experience, I’d seen time and time again that our customers wanted their boards in days—not weeks—and I also saw how they were willing to pay just about any premium price to get them more quickly. I figured that we have to build them anyway, so why not service the customer and give them exactly what they need? When we started our business, there were around twenty-five shops in the Seattle area. Today, we are one of the only traditional PCB shops left in Washington State, and I attribute that to our decision to go with the prototypes and the smallquantity, quick-turn PCBs. When we first started, our competitors were production-type facilities with lead times averaging between four and six weeks—and sometimes even further out. We were able to turn orders in five working days. The other shop owners laughed at us for being a small-volume, quick-turn facility, but we stuck to our guns and were eventually the only ones to survive.
The hardest part of starting a business is getting customers and sales. What was your experience with Prototron at this beginning stage? I had been in boards for around ten years before we started the company.
16
Of course, over ten years in management spots, I started to accumulate lists of customers and made relationships with people, so we knew some people to call. We also got pretty aggressive with a mailing campaign by using a typewriter and drafting up flyers and getting copies made. This was before the days of e-mail, of course. That was enough to get us started and at about the year mark, we went out to look for our first real salesperson, which really turned the corner for us. At that point we started growing and adding people, equipment, processes, and technology. Basically, it has carried on in that vein since then. We have now grown to the point where we have two facilities: Redmond at 35,000 square feet and Tucson, which has 19,000 square feet.
What makes Prototron the best in your customer’s eyes? We take things like due dates quite seriously. The on-time rate in the industry today is at 80 percent, so we are at quite a distance ahead of most others out there. Giving the customer what they are asking for and making sure the quality and communication and the integrity are all there. We have always been a prototype shop, but we have always built with production quality as our goal—it’s never been a trial-and-error scenario. When you think about why someone pays a premium for a 24-hour turnaround, they are doing so because it is so important that the board gets done in that amount of time. Prototron deals in a world where there is visibility all the way up to the
INDUSTRY INTERVIEW CEO—the customers need the board to make a milestone, deadline, or to go to a trade show. The customer typically deals in an elite world where if we don’t deliver that board on time, then we have let the customer down; but this doesn’t happen at Prototron. Many other board shops promise as high an on-time rate as we do, but do they really do it? There is a reason why the industry average for ontime delivery is 83 percent. Prototron insists on a pure measurement of our on-time delivery performance. By that, I mean that we set the date and that’s it. If we are going to miss a date we miss the date and count it. Every other shop I know calls the customer, gets a new date and then if they make that date, they call it on time. We will deem it late even if the customer gives us a new date. We live and die with on-time delivery.
How do you handle sales and marketing for a quick-turn prototype shop? Prototron’s National Sales Manager, Russ Adams, can tell you what it takes: ≫ Attending over twenty trade shows ≫ A strong marketing budget with clear marketing message ≫ An extensive proprietary lead-generation plan ≫ Most importantly, a national sales force made up of ten experienced and seasoned sales professionals located all around the United States ≫ A sales manager who is on the road three out of every four weeks making sure that all those plates are spinning all the time.
Do work with the customer to not only make sure they have good, functional prototype, but also a manufacturable prototype? That is exactly what we do. In the beginning phases, we have a lot of communication back and forth with our pre-engineering or CAM department about what is buildable and what is not. Frankly, we will see stuff that we know that we can build, and if it is not buildable in production quantities. We will point those things out to the customer—we can give them what they are asking for, but they are not going to like this when they go offshore.
17
Modern Printed Circuits
For a lot of our customers, we function as an additional research and development department. They just place a call to us, speak with someone in our pre-engineering department and if we don’t have an answer for their questions, then we will hook you up with someone who can help you get there. The last thing we want is for the customer to be unhappy with the product that they have purchased from us. We like to say that the design is not complete until that first board is built.
Does each facility do different tasks? Yes. We bought the Tucson facility in 1999 so that we could handle military work. We also work on RF products built from special materials in that facility. Redmond does more commercial and new product development work.
Your slogan is “Prototron: America’s Board Shop.” How important is it to you that you are US-based, and what kind of benefit does it add for your customers? If the customer has a problem with a board from Prototron, we will work hard to make sure we fix it. We speak the same language as the majority of our customers, which are almost all located
in North America. This means we are easily accessible immediately by phone, e-mail, or in person. We have sales people in various locations that can get to the customer quickly to further help them with any issues that may come up. We believe that it is critically important that our customers know exactly where their boards come from. Many of our customers are in the defense and security business, so their boards should not be built offshore. Then again, many of our customers are involved in inventions and in new product development, and we don’t want those ideas going offshore where they can be copied.
Prototron has already come a long way since its inception. Where do you hope to be in the next couple of years? We certainly want to continue steady growth. From a technology standpoint, things are growing at such an amazing pace right now that it is hard to say what things will look like in another 36 or 48 months. However, we expect more of the same and to build smaller holes and smaller traces—the technology will definitely progress to a smaller
“We take things like due dates quite seriously. We have an on-time rate of over 98% year after year. The on-time rate in the industry today is at 80 percent, so we are at quite a distance ahead of most others out there.”
18
INDUSTRY INTERVIEW
19
Modern Printed Circuits
“Things are growing at such an amazing pace right now that it is hard to say what things will look like in another 36 or 48 months.” at pre-9/11 numbers, there were around 1,500 shops in the US, and today, we are somewhere in the 250 to 300 range. It’s definitely very competitive out there.
There is a lot of talk nowadays about “onshoring” and bringing business back to the US. How do you see that playing out?
and tighter fashion. We are in the speed business first and foremost and we follow what our customer’s needs are when it comes to technology. Our customers dictate our technology level both today and in the future.
What is the state of the board shop industry today? If you were to look up IPC’s numbers, you would see a flat line in terms of domestic production. Everyone has been struggling right now due to offshoring. If you look
20
We have seen a bit of this affecting business. Occasionally, we’ll see a few customers trying to place bigger quantity orders with us compared to what we have been seeing for a period of time. In talking with customers directly, you do hear that things are not as easy as people would like you to believe in terms of purchasing offshore—everything is all good until you have a problem and you can’t get anybody to help you. Sometimes the shipping is a problem, so we are seeing a shift in things being manufactured in the US, but price remains a pretty major factor in that.
Is cost parity with offshore shops the biggest issue facing American shops like Prototron? Price is always an issue. We face that challenge on a pretty regular basis. There are a number of small shops out there that will give you whatever your files say; this is usually pretty cheap, which puts us at a disadvantage because the customer thinks we are over-charging
INDUSTRY INTERVIEW How do you build a 12-layer board in one day?
them. However, we believe that by going the extra mile with the customer and by manufacturing here in the US, that we offer a more dependable product. We offer UL, ITAR, and ISO—so we believe we are everything you could ask for in a board shop. We like to say that if you are truly serious about your boards then you should buy from Prototron Circuits.
How important is longevity of employees at Prototron? Longevity of employees is a key factor for us. This is what makes us reliable and in our 28 years in business: we have more than a few employees that have been here for over 20 years, which really says something about the type of organization we are. Our goal has always been to make Prototron a great place to work and I like to think we have accomplished that. In fact, a few years ago when we hired a new Operations Manager who had worked with a number of shops during his career we heard that he went home and told his wife; “You wouldn’t believe how polite everyone is at Prototron.” I took that as a compliment.
For more information, go to: www.prototron.com.
8:00 AM
PO is received and order is released from sales.
8:15 AM
Order has been Previewed and released to CAM.
11:45 AM
Order through the CAM department and files sent to direct imaging and put in planning.
12:00 PM
Planning releases order to production and material is pulled and put in dryfilm.
1:30 PM
Inner layers coated, exposed on the maskless DI, developed and taken to etch.
2:15 PM
Inner layers have been etched, stripped, punched and taken to AOI.
3:15 PM
Inner layers have been AOI’d, inspected, oxided, and taken to layup.
7:30 PM
Layers have been layed up, pressed and taken to drilling.
9:00 PM
Panels have been drilled and taken to plating for cuposit.
11:30 PM
Panels have been cuposited and taken back to dryfilm for final Image.
12:00 AM
Panels coated, imaged on the maskless D. I., inspected, and taken to plating.
2:00 AM
Panels have been plated and taken to strip/etch.
3:00 AM
Panels have been etched and inspected and taken to screening.
6:00 AM
Panels have been LPI’d, ID’d, and taken to surface finish.
6:30 AM
Panels have been through HAL and taken to test (Add 1hr for ENIG).
7:00 AM
Panels have been tested and taken to fab.
7:30 AM
Order has been routed and taken to Q.C. for final inspection.
8:00 AM
Order has been inspected. (Add 1+ hours if F.A./ cross section is required)
This time study is based on a Standard 12x18 12 layer during average production volumes that has been expedited through the facility.
21
Modern Printed Circuits
Rise from Ashes
Salvaging Precious Metals Part 2 By Colin Jeffrey, Contributing Writer
In the previous article, “PCBs Rise from Ashes,” Salvaging Circuits Rise from Ashes By Colin Jeffrey, Contributing Writer
P
CB design and production face tight performance specifications that result in utilizing whatever components are best suited to achieving that goal. Under these
conditions, little thought is generally given to eventual disposal of these components at the end of their useful lifecycle. However, with e-waste (electronic waste) growing at an exponential rate worldwide, populated and bare PCBs alike are problematic
methods and processes behind the recycling of PCBs and components were explored. This installment takes a look at the recovered
components of the ever-growing stockpile of discarded equipment.
materials themselves—the rare earth elements, To read the previous article, click on the inage above.
24
along with precious metals.
TECH SERIES
25
Modern Printed Circuits
Rare Earth Elements
Repurposing LEDs
As advances in electronic components arise from the transformation of scientific research into usable technology, so too do the rare-earth* elements used in much of that research need to be sourced in commercial quantities to make the devices commercially practical. As part of that transformation, these elements must be mined and processed in greater and greater quantities to meet that demand.
On the flip side, extraction of rare earth and other materials from certain devices is not only uneconomic, it is also exceptionally difficult. White LEDs, for example, contain indium, gallium, cerium, europium, gadolinium, and yttrium in miniscule amounts—all of which are exceedingly difficult to extract from such components. Though, given that more than 25 billion white LEDs were produced in 2011 alone (according to the National Academy of Sciences assessment on advanced solid state lighting), these tiny amounts quickly add up to very large amounts of rare elements that are largely unrecovered, and unrecoverable. In other words, many tons of rare earth materials simply end up in landfill every year.
However, despite the fact that many of these elements are, as their title suggests, “rare,” and should be prime candidates for recycling, they are still largely sourced from suppliers of mined product. In fact, almost exclusively: according to the latest figures, less than 1 percent of most rare earths critical to the electronics component industry are recycled at the end of their useful life. Precious metals on the other hand, have recycle rates above 50 percent, indicating that elements with traditional fiscal worth still drive the majority of recovery operations simply based on perceived intrinsic value. Given, for example, that europium is more than USD$1000 per gram more expensive than gold, however, it is clear that electronics market forces do not yet have a clear understanding of the value of rare earth minerals.
26
This is not to say that research isn’t being conducted by forward-thinking organizations. The U.S. Department of Energy via its AMES laboratory, for example, has been awarded $120 million over five years to help develop solutions to foreseen domestic shortages of rare earth materials, of which some will be dedicated to honing national materials recycling strategies. Such research is a doubleedged sword for the likes of the energy department, though—LEDs are intrinsic to a plan for reduction in national energy consumption, but their recycling at the end of their useful life remains problematic.
TECH SERIES
“According to the latest f igures , less than 1 percent of most rare ear ths critical to the electronics component industr y are recycled at the end of their useful life.” Of the few private organizations actively involved in similar approaches, Molycorp, a rare earth mining company headquartered in the U.S., also sees the benefits in having a long-term strategy for recycling such material, particularly as the amount of raw product that they can mine struggles to keep up with world demand. According to Molycorp, the limited number of economically practical sources of rare earths and the decreasing amount of exports from China are actually creating opportunities to recycle and reuse rare earth materials as part of a whole of product lifecycle.
Similarly, the European-based, governmentfunded “Reclaim Sustainable Mining Project” specifically targets the recovery and reprocessing of gallium, indium, and other rare-earth elements from solid-state lighting and other e-waste. Though still in the assessment stage until September 2015, the core function of Reclaim is to also investigate sustainable methods for the efficient and economical retrieval of identified key metals from e-waste, specifically listing their intended recovery processes including the interestingly-titled method of “slug-flow emulsion hybrid membrane pertraction.”
* The rare earths include the elements yttrium, scandium, tantalum, gallium and indium and the lanthanides (lanthanum, cerium, praseodymium, neodymium, promethium, samarium, europium, gadolinium, terbium, dysprosium, holmium, erbium, thulium, ytterbium and lutetium).
27
Modern Printed Circuits
Extracting Precious Metals Platinum, palladium, gold, and silver still hold sway as the major elements recycled from PCBs and their associated components. Though, as previously stated, the actual economic viability of their extraction from discarded electronic equipment may be questionable. Many companies, particularly in the less developed parts of the world, are able to make sufficient profits to justify it. In India, over 10,000 unskilled workers are involved in PCB recycling in Delhi alone. Of this work, some 280 grams of gold and 450 grams of silver are recovered from every 1000 kilograms of e-waste; a staggeringly small amount but, given the starvation wages of those in such informal employment, it is a significant bounty—for their employers, at least.
Similarly, in China, despite the importation of e-waste being officially banned by the Chinese government, the city of Guiya, a town of 150,000 people, employs more than 100,000 people in the illegal recycling business. Again, workers are very poorly paid, but the profits drawn from precious metal recovery is significant for those that run these businesses. Yet, even with the amount of precious metal “mined” in this way, much of it is then simply sold on to gold merchants where it does not go directly back into manufacturing electronics. Instead, it is much more likely to go on to be further processed into ingots destined for the international gold market, where much of it will be removed and hoarded as a hedge against harsh economic times.
“ Platinum , palladium , gold , and silver still hold sway as the major elements recycled from PCBs and their associated components .”
28
TECH SERIES
Conclusion Theoretically, any metal element, whether precious or rare earth, can be recovered by recycling. It is merely a matter of extracting the element from the impurities in which it is found in a way not too dissimilar to the process applied when it was first mined. From a practical standpoint, however, the major impediment is one of cost: if it costs more to extract material than to buy it from a supplier of raw material, then economic realities dictate that a manufacturer will purchase the cheaper product. Unfortunately, the practical application of effort to this end does not meet the perceived need. Indeed, it is the more common elements—such as copper, tin, nickel, gold, and platinum—that are the most recovered in the recycling process. Partly because they are easier to extract with relatively unsophisticated melting and rendering techniques, but mostly because they exist in larger quantities than do the rare-earth elements whose recovery does not (as yet) offer a return on investment to do so.
References
• “Byproduct Metals and Rare-Earth Elements Used in the Production of Light-Emitting Diodes—Overview of Principal Sources of Supply and Material Requirements for Selected Markets” http:// pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2012/5215/ • “Ames Laboratory to Lead New Research Effort to Address Shortages in Rare Earth and Other Critical Materials” http://energy. gov/articles/ames-laboratory-lead-newresearch-effort-address-shortages-rareearth-and-other-critical • “Effective electronic waste management and recycling process involving formal and non-formal sectors.” http://www. scirp.org/journal/PaperInformation. aspx?paperID=42315 • “Assessment of Advanced Solid State Lighting” National Academy of Sciences ISBN: 978-0-309-27011-3 • http://www.chemicool.com/elements/ europium.html • http://www.re-claim.eu/ • http://www.molycorp.com/technology/ rare-earth-recycling/
As a result, countries such as China who are embedded in electronic component manufacturing are also intrinsic in the supply of rare-earth elements where, according to the USGS, they supply more than 97 percent of the world’s cerium, gadolinium, and yttrium. As such, the incentive at the original component level to incorporate recycled elements is low, just as it is at the end-of-lifecycle when the same country is the one who recycles e-waste; where raw product is far cheaper and easier to obtain.
29
M o v i n g To w a r d s a
David Elien VP of Marketing & Business Development, Cree, Inc.
Clean Energy
Let There Be
LIGHT
FUTURE
How Cree reinvented the light bulb
— Hugo van Nispen, COO of DNV KEMA
Cutting Edge
SPICE
Modeling
MCU Wars 32-bit MCU Comparison
+
Cutting Edge Flatscreen Technologies
+
New LED Filament Tower
View more EEWeb magazines— Click Here
Power Developer O ct o b er
201 3
From Concept to
Reality
Sierra Circuits:
Designing for
Durability
A Complete PCB Resource
Wolfgang Heinz-Fischer Head of Marketing & PR, TQ-Group
TQ-Group’s Comprehensive Design Process
Freescale and TI Embedded Modules
+
Ken Bahl CEO of Sierra Circuits
PLUS: The “ Ground ” Myth in Printed Circuits
+
+
PCB Resin Reactor
ARM Cortex Programming
Low-Power Design Techniques