Corporate Carbon Footprint 2020 by ejotsverige

Sustainability connects

Corporate Carbon Footprint Report 2020 EJOT Holding GmbH & Co. KG Bad Berleburg, 01.05.2021

EJOT Corporate Carbon Footprint Report 2020

Table of contents 1.

PREFACE

STANDARDS

SCOPE OF APPLICATION

SYSTEM BOUNDARIES

4.1. 4.2. 4.3.

SYSTEM BOUNDARIES OF THE COMPANY OPERATIONAL SYSTEM BOUNDARIES OF THE SCOPE CATEGORIES OPERATIONAL BOUNDARIES OF SCOPE 1, 2 AND 3 SUB-CATEGORIES

8 9 10

REPORTING PERIOD

MATERIALITY ANALYSIS

6.1. 6.2. 7.

CRITERIA RESULTS OF THE MATERIALITY ANALYSIS

13 14

RESULTS OF THE CORPORATE CARBON FOOTPRINT 7.1. DQS CERTIFICATION AUDIT SEPTEMBER 2020 7.1.1. Total CO2e emissions Germany 7.1.2. Significant emission sources 7.1.2.1. Emissions from natural gas 7.1.2.2. Scope 2.1 Emissions from purchased electricity 7.1.3. What have we achieved? 7.1.4. Further significant emission sources 7.1.5. Less significant emission sources 7.2. EMISSIONS PLANT IN DER AUE 7.2.1. Total CO2e plant In der Aue 7.2.2. Significant emission sources plant In der Aue 7.2.3. What have we achieved? 7.2.4. The following projects are in the implementation phase or in planning 7.3. EMISSIONS PLANT UNTERE BIENHECKE 7.3.1. Total CO2e plant Untere Bienhecke 7.3.2. Significant emission sources plant Untere Bienhecke 7.3.3. What have we achieved? 7.3.4. The following projects are in the implementation phase or in planning 7.4. EMISSIONS PLANT HERRENWIESE 7.4.1. Total CO2e Herrenwiese plant 7.4.2. Significant emission sources plant Herrenwiese 7.4.3. What have we achieved? 7.4.4. The following projects are in the implementation phase or in planning 7.5. EMISSIONS PLANT TAMBACH 7.5.1. Total CO2e plant Tambach 7.5.2. Significant emission sources plant Tambach 7.5.3. What have we achieved? 7.5.4. The following projects are in the implementation phase or in planning 7.6. EMISSIONS BERGHAUSEN PLANT 7.6.1. Total CO2e Berghausen plant 7.6.2. Significant emission sources Berghausen plant 7.6.3. What have we achieved? 7.7. EMISSIONS STOCKWIESE AND LAHNUFERSTRAßE PLANTS 7.7.1. Total CO2e plant Stockwiese and Lahnuferstraße 7.7.2. Significant emission sources plant Stockwiese and Lahnuferstraße 7.7.3. What have we achieved? 7.7.4. The following projects are in the implementation phase or in planning 7.8. EMISSIONS EJOT HOLDING 7.8.1. Total CO2e EJOT Holding 1

16 16 17 18 18 19 20 20 22 23 23 24 25 25 26 26 27 28 28 29 29 30 30 30 31 31 32 33 33 34 34 35 35 36 36 37 37 37 38 38

EJOT Corporate Carbon Footprint Report 2020

7.9. TOTAL EMISSIONS INTERNATIONAL LOCATIONS 7.9.1. Joint Venture location EJOT ATF Mexico 7.9.2. Total CO2e EJOT ATF Mexico 7.9.2.1. Significant emission sources EJOT ATF Mexico 7.9.2.2. What have we achieved? 7.9.3. EJOT Turkey 7.9.4. Total CO2e EJOT Turkey 7.9.4.1. Significant emission sources EJOT Tezmak 7.9.4.2. What have we achieved? 7.9.4.3. What have we achieved? 7.9.5. EJOT Poland 7.9.6. Total CO2e EJOT Poland 7.9.6.1. Significant emission sources EJOT Poland 7.9.6.2. What have we achieved? 7.9.7. EJOT Switzerland 7.9.8. Total CO2e EJOT Switzerland 7.9.8.1. Significant emission sources EJOT Switzerland 7.9.8.2. What have we achieved? 7.9.9. EJOT Sweden 7.9.10. Total CO2e EJOT Sweden 7.9.10.1. What have we achieved? 7.9.11. EJOT China 7.9.11.1. Significant emission sources EJOT China 7.9.11.2. What have we achieved? 7.9.11.3. The following projects are in the implementation phase or in planning 8.

ASSUMPTIONS AND UNCERTAINTIES 8.1. 8.2.

39 39 39 40 40 41 41 41 42 42 43 43 43 44 45 45 46 46 47 47 47 48 48 48 48 49

EJOT GERMANY INTERNATIONAL EJOT LOCATIONS

49 50

SIGNATURES EJOT HOLDING MANAGEMENT

10. CONTACT

11. LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS

12. APPENDIX TO THE CCF REPORT 2020

EJOT Corporate Carbon Footprint Report 2020

1. Preface Dear readers, Germany is pursuing the ambitious goal of becoming CO2 neutral by 2050. As a successful industrial company, EJOT supports this demanding project of the federal government. Basically, this means we transfer our previous efforts to save energy and CO2 into a sustainability project. Climate change is on everyone's lips and we want to achieve real reductions in consumption by means of the previous goal of a disproportionately low increase in our CO2 consumption. A challenging task, especially since CO2-neutral steel or plastic granulate can not be expected for a long time. Last year, the greenhouse gas balance of the German EJOT sites was checked for the first time by an external company, the German Society for the Certification of Management Systems (DQS), using the international standard DIN EN ISO 14064. This was particularly important in order to identify sources of error and potential for improvement. But also to ensure a credible and transparent position towards our internal and external stakeholders when it comes to reducing greenhouse gases. Under the guiding principle "Quality connects – Sustainability joins", EJOT is committed to three core statements and is thus further developing the strategy towards a CO2-neutral company until the year 2030: • • •

Thinking sustainably More efficient Green energy

Of course, we also look at our international production facilities in our process of reducing our CO2 emissions. Sites such as EJOT Poland, EJOT China, EJOT ATF Mexico and EJOT Tezmak (Turkey) have grown strongly in recent years and will continue to expand their production in the future. Even during the planning phases for renovations and new buildings, the idea of sustainability is kept in mind in order to reduce CO2 emissions. Modern technology such as building management systems and energy measurement systems are used for this purpose. With our activities to save energy and increase energy efficiency, we effectively promote and shape the transformation to a sustainable and climate-neutral company. Bad Berleburg, 01.05.2021

A. Wetzstein General Manager HR / Legal

EJOT Corporate Carbon Footprint Report 2020

Summary In order to achieve the ambitious goal "EJOT will be climate-neutral by 2030”, even more will be invested in solar and heat recovery systems in the future. With the entry into electromobility, we want to reduce another source of emissions to zero. By purchasing “green electricity certificates”, we have been offsetting CO2 emissions from electricity consumption since the beginning of 2021. This certificate confirms that the electricity is obtained exclusively from hydropower plants. In the past few years, the EJOT environmental/energy management system has continuously improved the collection and evaluation of the required data. It is encouraging that the greenhouse gas emissions in the categories Scope 1 – 3 at the German EJOT sites have been continuously reduced since 2016. In the area of indirect emissions (Scope 3), downstream transport emissions, for example, which also make up a significant share of greenhouse gases at EJOT, must also be listed since 2019, in accordance with the principle of materiality. This area is difficult to influence directly by EJOT, but is among other things the responsibility of transport companies. For the responsible department Supply Chain Management (SCM) at EJOT, it is a strategic goal to work with transport companies that position themselves sustainably and reduce transport emissions. Our projects are - amongst others: • • • • •

Replacement of old space heating systems for energy-efficient systems Conversion of old lighting systems to LED Energy-efficient compressors and monitoring of compressed air consumption Energy-efficient ventilation systems with heat recovery. Expansion of renewable energies, e.g. construction of photovoltaic systems for renovations and new buildings

EJOT Corporate Carbon Footprint Report 2020

2. Standards •

GHG Protocol Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard for scope 1 and 2 categories.

•

GHG Corporate Value Chain Accounting and Reporting Standard for scope 3 categories of the corporate upstream and downstream value chain. DIN EN ISO 14064-1 Greenhouse gases Part 1: Specification with guidelines at the organization level for quantification and reporting of greenhouse gas emissions and removals (ISO 14064-1:2006);

German and English version EN ISO 14064-1:2018 •

DIN EN ISO 14001 Environmental management systems - Requirements with guidance for use (ISO 14001:2015); Germand and English version EN ISO 14001:2015

•

DIN EN ISO 50001 Energy management systems - Requirements with guidance for use (ISO 50001:2018); German version EN ISO 50001:2018

EJOT Corporate Carbon Footprint Report 2020

3. Scope of application The scope of application of the CCF report conforms to ISO 14001:2015: Development, production, testing and distribution of screws, cold-formed parts, thermoplastic injection-moulded parts, assemblies for the automotive industry and elements / systems for the construction industry. A verification according to ISO 14064 was completed for the German locations. Further international locations are currently in the process of data acquisition and analysis. National locations including Holding

Scope of application

EJOT GmbH & Co. KG Plant Berghausen / Business Unit Insert Molding / Headlamp Adjuster

Development, production, testing and distribution of thermoplastic injection-moulded parts, assemblies for the automotive industry and elements for metal / plastic components and systems as well as elements for external thermal insulation composite systems

Adolf-Böhl-Straße 7 57319 Bad Berleburg-Berghausen Germany

EJOT GmbH & Co. KG Plant Berleburg / Business Unit Cold Forming Astenbergstraße 21 57319 Bad Berleburg Germany EJOT Holding GmbH & Co. KG Im Herrengarten 1 57319 Bad Berleburg Germany

Development, production, testing and distribution of screws, cold-formed parts and assemblies for the automotive industry

Central functions, human resources management, environmental protection and occupational health and safety, facility management

EJOT GmbH & Co. KG Plant In der Aue / Business Unit Screws for Building Fasteners Business Unit Building Screws In der Aue 38 57334 Bad Laasphe Germany

Development, production, testing and distribution of screws and cold-formed parts for the construction industry

EJOT Baubefestigungen GmbH In der Stockwiese 35 57334 Bad Laasphe Germany

Development, production, testing and distribution of screws, anchors and fasteners

EJOT GmbH & Co. KG Plant Eberhard Jäger / Business Unit Cold Forming Forming Untere Bienhecke 16 57334 Bad Laasphe Germany EJOT GmbH & Co. KG Business Unit Thread Forming, EJOSYST, EJOWELD Im Grund 4 99897 Tambach-Dietharz Germany

Development, production, testing and distribution of screws, anchors, cold-formed parts and assemblies for the automotive industry and construction industry

Development and production of screws, coldformed parts, thermoplastic injection-moulded parts and assemblies for the automotive industry

EJOT Corporate Carbon Footprint Report 2020

International locations

Scope of application

EJOT Schweiz AG Uttwilerstraße 3 8582 Dozwil Switzerland

Development, production and distribution of challenging engineered plastic components, complex assemblies and fastening elements for the automotive supplier, construction, consumer goods, telecommunication and electronic industry

EJOTATF FASTENERS DE MÉXICO Y COMPAŇIA, S. EN C. Avenida del Siglo 180 Parque Industrial Millennium, CP 78395 San Luis Potosí, S.L.P. Mexico

Production of screws / cold-formed parts and distribution of special fastening elements, assemblies, thermoplastic injection-moulded parts and elements / systems for various markets

EJOT Polska Sp. z o.o. ul. Jeżowska 9 42-793 Ciasna Poland

EJOT Polska Spółka z ograniczoną odpowiedzialnością Sp.k. ul. Niemiecka 2 47-143 Olszowa Poland

Storage and shipping

EJOT Sverige AB Sandtagsvägen 9 702 36 Örebro Sweden

Supply of mechanical fasteners and technical advice

EJOT TEZMAK Bağlantı Elemanları Teknolojileri San. ve Tic. A.Ş. Cebeci Cad. No. 84 Küçükköy-Istanbul Turkey

Development and production of screws, coldformed parts and assemblies

EJOT Fastening systems (Taicang China) Co., Ltd. No. 165 Fada Road Loudong Taicang Development Zone Taicang, Jiangsu Province P.R. China 215413

Development and production of fastening elements and injection-moulded parts

EJOT Corporate Carbon Footprint Report 2020

4. System boundaries By specifying system boundaries, EJOT defines the subjects relevant to the company. 4.1.

System boundaries of the company

System boundaries according to the Greenhouse Gas Protocol (GHG) Fixed base year The emissions calculated for the base year will serve as a benchmark for the development of emissions in the future. Reduction targets are defined with reference to the base year.

Reporting year Control approach

For the first survey, the reporting year is the same as the base year Emissions that are subject to the system boundaries must be 100% determined.

System boundaries according to the Greenhouse Gas Protocol (GHG) Greenhouse According to the Kyoto Protocol, all 7 gases greenhouse gases (GHGs) must be considered in the survey: • • • • • • •

Carbon dioxide - CO2 Methane Nitrous oxide (laughing gas) Hydrofluorocarbons Perfluorocarbons Sulphur hexafluoride Nitrogen trifluoride

Organisational boundaries EJOT Germany: 2016 Analysis: EJOT ATF Mexico (Mexico EAFM) EJOT Poland: EJOT Turkey EJOT Switzerland EJOT Sweden EJOT China EJOT UK SORMAT 2020 Operational control for the sites which are subject to "2nd scope of application". This means: The organisation has full authority to initiate and conduct its business policy at the locations Organisational boundaries The CO2e emissions are determined using the following emissions databases: • • • •

Current EF electricity network provider DEFRA (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs) German Environment Agency Forschungsstelle für Energiewirtschaft e.V

EJOT Corporate Carbon Footprint Report 2020

4.2. Scope 1

Operational system boundaries of the scope categories CCF survey according to GHG Protocol Must be surveyed in full

Operational boundaries EJOT Germany A survey takes place for the categories: 1, 2, 3 and 4

Must be surveyed in full

A survey takes place for the category: 1

Scope 3 categories are voluntary and will be surveyed according to the principle of essentiality and possibility. According to the GHG Protocol, a statement must be made for each scope 3 category. If a category is not evaluated, this must be justified.

A survey takes place for the categories: 1, 3, 5, 6, 7, 9 and 12

Operational boundaries International A survey is carried out for the following subcategories: EJOT ATF Mexico: 1, 2 EJOT Poland: 1, 2 EJOT Turkey: 1, 2 EJOT Switzerland 1, 2 EJOT Sweden: 2 EJOT China: none EJOT UK: 1,2 SORMAT:1,2 A survey is carried out for the following subcategories: EJOT ATF Mexico: 1 EJOT Poland: 1 EJOT Turkey: 1 EJOT Switzerland: 1 EJOT Sweden: 1, 2 EJOT China: 1 EJOT UK: 1 SORMAT: 1 A survey is carried out for the following subcategories: EJOT ATF Mexico: 1 EJOT Poland: 1 EJOT Turkey: 1 EJOT Switzerland: 1 EJOT Sweden: EJOT China: 1 EJOT UK: 1 SORMAT: 1

EJOT Corporate Carbon Footprint Report 2020

4.3.

Operational boundaries of scope 1, 2 and 3 sub-categories

Scope category

Description according to GHG Protocol

Description of the system boundaries at EJOT

Scope 1 – Direct emissions 1.1

Direct emissions from stationary combustion sources

The natural gas/heating oil consumption from the stationary heating systems are considered. The data basis for Germany is provided by invoices.

1.2

Direct emissions from mobile combustion sources

The fuel consumption of diesel and petrol of the EJOT vehicle fleet is examined. In addition, diesel and liquid petrol gas consumption of forklift trucks is determined.

1.3

Direct fugitive emissions

Climate-relevant gases are considered which could escape due to leaks in airconditioning and refrigeration systems. A leakage loss of 2% of the filling volume of the system is considered. For systems that require monitoring, the entry is made in accordance with the maintenance log of the specialist company.

1.4

Direct emissions from processes

The use of process gases is considered.

Scope 2 - Electricity indirect emissions 2.1

Indirect emissions from purchased electricity

Electricity consumption of the location is examined. The network operator's invoices form the base data for German locations.

2.2

Indirect emissions from district heating / cooling

This scope category only refers to the location in Sweden. The indirect emissions from district heating are accounted for.

2.3

Indirect emissions from purchased steam

Does not apply to EJOT

Data quality

EJOT Corporate Carbon Footprint Report 2020

Scope category

Description according to GHG Protocol

Description of the system boundaries at EJOT

Scope 3 - Other indirect emissions upstream value chain (only Germany) 3.1

Purchased goods and services

Sourced wire, sourced granulate, cleaning agents, oils and greases, chemicals, packaging and purchased products are examined. Only weight quantities are considered. Litres are converted into kilograms.

3.2

Capital goods

This category is not considered because transparency cannot be guaranteed.

3.3

Fuel- and energy-related activities

The basis is the natural gas / heating oil and electricity consumption from scope 1 and 2, as well as the consumption of diesel, petrol and liquefied petroleum gas.

3.4

Upstream transportation and distribution

The scope category was excluded because the emissions incurred can be assigned to the suppliers.

Scope 3 - Other indirect emissions upstream value chain (only Germany) 3.5

Waste generated in operations

The basis is the annual waste balance.

3.6

Business travel

Only flights are considered. For air travel emission factors, 9% are added to the distance in order to account for additionally covered distances (e.g. rerouting, holding patterns). Furthermore, this value is multiplied by a "Radiative Forcing Index (RFI) of 1.9, which accounts for the increased impact of air travel emissions.

3.7

Employee commuting

The distance from the employee's hometown to his workplace is considered. The basis are 220 working days.

3.8

Upstream leased assets

Is not surveyed

3.9

Downstream transportation and distribution

The transports at the Tambach, Herrenwiese and Stockwiese locations were examined.

3.10

Processing of sold products

Is not surveyed

Data quality

EJOT Corporate Carbon Footprint Report 2020

Scope category

Description according to GHG Protocol

Description of the system boundaries at EJOT

3.11

Use of sold products

Is not surveyed

3.12

End-of-life treatment of sold products

Emissions from the disposal of sold products are only related to the material, i.e. waste from plastic and metal.

Data quality

Accordingly, the quantities from the scope 3.9 category are regarded as the disposal quantity. 3.13

Is not surveyed

3.14

Downstream leased assets Franchises

3.15

Investments

Is not surveyed

5. Reporting period The greenhouse gas emissions for the period from 01.01.2020 to 31.12.2020 are reported.

EJOT Corporate Carbon Footprint Report 2020

6. Materiality analysis 6.1.

Criteria

By defining 4 criteria, the scope categories 1 to 3 have to be considered for their importance / materiality for the company. This applies in particular to the Scope 3 category (emission sources of the upstream and downstream value chain). The criteria already defined in the specification sheet and in this CCF report were merged. The following equally weighted criteria were determined: 1. 2. 3. 4.

Difficulties in obtaining the data Data quality Relevance for the company (amount of emissions in tons) Controllability of the emission source

Depending on the subdivision of the criterion, points are awarded when assessing the scope category (see table: "Criteria for assessing materiality"). The following applies: The more points a scope category achieves, the more important it is and should therefore also be reported. In the mean of the 4 criteria, a maximum of 100 points can be achieved (100 points for each criterion). The categories Scope 1 and Scope 2 are classified as essential for EJOT, regardless of the points achieved. Scope 3 categories with an average of <50 points are removed from the assessment. The reasons are recorded in the materiality analysis. The following criteria were specified:

EJOT Corporate Carbon Footprint Report 2020

6.2.

Results of the materiality analysis

The scope categories “means of production / capital goods” and “upstream transport” were removed from the survey due to high uncertainties in the data quality and in the procurement of the data Both categories are below 50 points and are marked in BLACK. All other scope categories listed in the graphics are> 50 points and marked RED. These categories are considered in the survey because they are essential.

Illustration 1: Materiality analysis 2020

EJOT Corporate Carbon Footprint Report 2020

Sources of emissions inside the

Sources of emissions outside of the company

Illustration 2: Materiality analysis 2020

EJOT Corporate Carbon Footprint Report 2020

7. Results of the Corporate Carbon Footprint 7.1.

DQS Certification audit September 2020

Determining the downstream transport emissions posed a major challenge in improving the greenhouse gas balance. This scope category 3.9 had to be collected retrospectively due to the new standard requirement of ISO 14064 as of 2018. After we spoke with our most important logistics companies about the survey of emissions, it emerged that the transports from the Herrenwiese and Stockwiese locations are roughly in balance and only about 5% of the transports are handled via the Tambach location. The following transport emissions could be determined from the 4 most important logistics companies. It was confirmed to us that the emissions were recorded on the basis of the ISO 16258 standard. Herrenwiese Stockwiese Tambach

Tons CO2e Tons CO2e Tons CO2e

EJOT Corporate Carbon Footprint Report 2020

7.1.1. Total CO2e emissions Germany Compared to the base year 2016, the total emissions scope 1,2 and 3 at the German locations could be reduced by 15%. In 2019, in addition to Scope 3 categories 3.1, 3.3, 3.5, 3.6, 3.7, 3.12 for the first time the downstream transport emissions, Scope 3.9, were also taken into account.

Chart 1 and 2

- 15% Less total emissions Scope 1, 2 and 3 compared to base year 2016

Chart 1

Share of total emissions:

12% Scope 1 20% Scope 2 68% Scope 3 Chart 2

The internal survey of the downstream transport emissions Scope 3.9 proved to be very difficult and had to be corrected retrospectively for 2019. In close cooperation with our largest logistics companies, it was possible to determine the emissions for our delivery locations for 2020. In addition to land transport, transport by sea and air was also taken into account. Chart 3

EJOT Corporate Carbon Footprint Report 2020

Emissions Scope 1, 2 and 3 including downstream transport emissions in 2019 and 2020

Chart 3

7.1.2. Significant emission sources The most significant and directly influenceable emission sources include direct emissions from stationary combustion sources, scope 1.1 and indirect emissions from purchased electricity, scope 2.1. Chart 4 and 5

Other significant sources of emissions are purchased goods, Scope 3.1, employee commuting, Scope 3.7 and downstream transport emissions, Scope 3.9. 7.1.2.1.

Emissions from natural gas

+ 14% more emissions from natural gas consumption Scope 1.1 compared to base year 2016

Chart 4

The 5 largest natural gas consumers in total natural gas consumption EU* are. EJOT Tambach

54.8 % share of total EU

EJOT Herrenwiese

17.3 % share of total EU

EJOT Untere Bienhecke

9.1 % share of total EU

EJOT Adolf-Böhl-Straße

4.1 % share of total EU

SORMAT OY (Heating energy from wood 3.7 % share of total EU pellets) The natural gas consumption per location is divided into the consumption of natural gas from stationary combustion sources (heating systems) and the consumption for production, e.g. for washing units, CHP, hardening furnaces´and electro-plating. 18

EJOT Corporate Carbon Footprint Report 2020

7.1.2.2.

Scope 2.1 Emissions from purchased electricity

The 5 largest electricity consumers in total EU electricity consumption are: EJOT Tambach

29.9 % share of total EU

EJOT Herrenwiese

23.4 % share of total EU

EJOT Polska

12.1 % share of total EU

EJOT Untere Bienhecke

10.7 % share of total EU

EJOT In der Aue

10.4 % share of total EU

The EU*, European Union, locations which have been certified according to ISO 50001, are considered. The electricity consumption for total EJOT Germany changed only slightly despite economic growth, especially in 2017 and 2018. The lower CO2e emissions in 2020 are due, among other things, to the effects of the corona pandemic.

- 13% Less emissions from electricity consumption scope 2.1 compared to base year 2016

Chart 5

EJOT Corporate Carbon Footprint Report 2020

7.1.3. What have we achieved? •

Efficiency analyses and the continuous setup of energy measurement systems make energy hotspots visible at the various locations. Selected locations are linked to reporting software.

•

The replacement of old technology and the use of new energy-efficient machines is continuously monitored by our strategic purchasing department.

•

Continuous replacement of old lamps with energy-efficient lighting systems.

•

In order to influence emissions from electricity consumption, compressed air optimisation measures are being pursued at all production sites.

•

More video and telephone conferences instead of air travel have reduced emissions from air traffic.

7.1.4. Further significant emission sources Another significant emission source of the scope 1 category are emissions from the EJOT motor pool. To reduce these emissions EJOT has set the goal of converting the entire vehicle fleet to 100% electric mobility by 2030. Gradually, the infrastructure is being expanded at the different sites with the construction of additional charging stations. Chart 6

- 11% less Emissions from the EJOT vehicle fleet scope 1.2 compared to base year 2016

Chart 6

EJOT Corporate Carbon Footprint Report 2020

In the scope 3 category, which describes the upstream and downstream value-added chain, further important emission sources have to be stated. Emissions from purchased granulate and wire can hardly be influenced and depend on the customers' demand for our products. In 2020, the corona pandemic had a direct impact on this scope category. Chart 7

- 24% less Emissions from the purchased goods Scope 3.1 compared to base year 2016

Chart 7

Significant but not influenceable emission sources are the upstream chain for fuel and energy-related emissions as well as the commuting of employees. Chart 8 and 9

- 4% less emissions from upstream chain electricity, natural gas, vehicle fleet scope 3.3 compared to base year 2016

Chart 8

+ 13% more emissions from the commuting of employees Scope 3.7 compared to base year 2016 The number of employees increased by approx. 15% compared to 2016.

Chart 9

EJOT Corporate Carbon Footprint Report 2020

7.1.5. Less significant emission sources Emissions from the disposal of waste, air travel and the disposal of products sold by the end consumer are less than 1000 t per year and less significant. Nevertheless, it is very important to EJOT to avoid, reduce or recycle waste wherever possible. Business trips are reduced by using modern cross-border communication options. At the end of their life cycle, most of our metal and plastic products are recyclable and can be returned to the material cycle. Chart 10, 11 and 12

+ 5% more emissions from waste scope 3.5 compared to base year 2016

Chart 10

- 64% less Emissions from business travel Scope 3.6 compared to base year 2016

Chart 11

+ 115% more Emissions from the disposal of sold products Scope 3.12 compared to base year 2016

Chart 12

EJOT Corporate Carbon Footprint Report 2020

7.2.

Emissions plant In der Aue

Number of employees as of 31.12.2020: 127 Units i.a.: Welding machines, annealing and hardening units, heading, thread rolling, pinch pointing, washing units 7.2.1. Total CO2e plant In der Aue The total emissions Scope 1, 2 and 3 increased by 5% compared to 2016.

Chart 13 and 14

+ 5% more total emissions Scope 1, 2 and 3 compared to base year 2016

Chart 13

Share of total emissions:

4% Scope 1 26% Scope 2 70% Scope 3

Chart 14

EJOT Corporate Carbon Footprint Report 2020

7.2.2. Significant emission sources plant In der Aue Most significant and directly influenceable emission source at the location In der Aue are emissions from purchased electricity. Another significant emission source are purchased goods such as wire, scope 3.1. Both Scope categories flow into the strategic EJOgreen group key figure. The aim is to influence this key figure through operational programs. Chart 15

Relatively constant Emissions from electricity consumption compared to base year 2016

Chart 15

A photovoltaic system is used to generate electricity. However, the share of the total electricity consumption of the location is relatively low at approx. 2% A less significant emission source are the emissions from stationary combustion sources. In 2020, the emissions from natural gas consumption were approx.12% lower than in 2019, but 8% above the base year 2016. Natural gas is only needed for heating systems at the location. Since the heating systems have been modernized in recent years, consumption depends solely on the outside temperature. Chart 17

Emissions from natural gas consumption Scope 1.1 Weather-dependent consumption

Chart 17

EJOT Corporate Carbon Footprint Report 2020

7.2.3. What have we achieved? •

• •

•

A new energy-efficient air compressor was installed and equipped with a heat exchanger, which will support the heating system. This was subsidized with over € 23,000 by the federal subsidy for energy efficiency in the economy. The savings potential is 5%. All pipes have been insulated so that heating energy is saved. All units are measured and recorded. Legal basis is the German Electricity Tax Act (Stromsteuergesetz, StromStG) § 9a waiver, reimbursement or remuneration of the tax for certain processes and procedures. 55% of the energy consumed can now be allocated fairly. New systems are equipped with measuring instruments.

7.2.4. The following projects are in the implementation phase or in planning •

• •

The construction and commissioning of a new washing unit is planned for 2021/2022. This will have a regenerative power supply and a completely insulated container and pipeline system. An “intelligent” compressed air shutdown for every machine is also in the planning stage. For 2022 investments in a new refrigeration system are planned.

EJOT Corporate Carbon Footprint Report 2020

7.3.

Emissions plant Untere Bienhecke

Number of employees as of 31.12.2020: 215 Units i.a.: Hardening shop, electroplating shop 7.3.1. Total CO2e plant Untere Bienhecke A comparison of the total emissions in 2020 to previous years is no longer possible since the relocation of production (headers, rollers, washing systems, toolmaking) to the Herrenwiese location in September 2019. The location is currently in the process of realigning or optimizing the areas of electroplating, hardening, maintenance, incoming goods and EJOMAT.

Chart 18 and 19

Total emissions Scope 1, 2 and 3 Relocation of micro screws from the location Untere Bienhecke to Herrenwiese in 09/2019

Chart 18

Share of total emissions:

24% Scope 1 58% Scope 2 18% Scope 3

Chart 19

EJOT Corporate Carbon Footprint Report 2020

7.3.2. Significant emission sources plant Untere Bienhecke Most significant and directly influenceable emission source at the location Untere Bienhecke are emissions from purchased electricity. Chart 20

Emissions from electricity consumption scope 2.1

Chart 20

Another significant emissions source are emissions from natural gas consumption. At the location Untere Bienhecke, various major systems have been equipped with energy meters in recent years, which, for example, record the heat flows at the hardening furnaces and electroplating equipment. Natural gas is needed for the stationary heating systems and also for production. Chart 21

Emissions from natural gas consumption Scope 1.1

Chart 21

EJOT Corporate Carbon Footprint Report 2020

7.3.3. What have we achieved? The site is in the middle of a restructuring phase • • • • •

Aqueous and alkaline waste from electroplating and the associated minimization of disposal quantities were reduced by around 150 tons compared to 2019. The compressed air consumption in the electroplating area could be reduced by approx. 2%. Implementation of a highly efficient cooling concept for the hardening shop. Hardening lines have been equipped with new efficient technology Installation of a new energy-efficient heating system for process heat electroplating.

7.3.4. The following projects are in the implementation phase or in planning •

Planning of two photovoltaic systems in 2021 and 2022 with approx. 60 kWp.

EJOT Corporate Carbon Footprint Report 2020

7.4.

Emissions plant Herrenwiese

Number of employees as of 31.12.2020: 538 Units i.a.: Special-purpose machines, sorting machines, heading, Thread rolling, washing units, logistics site 7.4.1. Total CO2e Herrenwiese plant The Herrenwiese location is one of the largest production and logistics locations of the EJOT Group worldwide and has a share of 24% of total electricity consumption in Germany. Natural gas consumption is around 19% of the total natural gas consumption in Germany.

Chart 22 and 23

A comparison of the total emissions in 2020 to previous years is no longer possible since the relocation of the micro screw production (headers, rollers, washing systems, toolmaking) in September 2019. Also see plant Untere Bienhecke. Total emissions Scope 1, 2 and 3 Relocation of micro screws from the location Untere Bienhecke to Herrenwiese in 09/2019

Chart 22

Share of total emissions:

8% Scope 1 20% Scope 2 72% Scope 3

Chart 23

EJOT Corporate Carbon Footprint Report 2020

7.4.2. Significant emission sources plant Herrenwiese Most significant and directly influenceable emission sources at the location Herrenwiese are emissions from natural gas consumption and emissions from purchased electricity. Another considerable emission source are purchased goods, for example wire. In addition to weatherrelated heating, natural gas is also required at this location for the combined heat and power plant and the washing units. All mentioned units are metrologically recorded. Chart 23 and 24

+ 4% Average annual change since base year 2016

Chart 23

+ 2% Average annual change since base year 2016 Relocation of micro screws to the location Herrenwiese in 09/2019

Chart 24

7.4.3. What have we achieved? • •

In order to reduce emissions from electricity consumption, the energy efficiency of the heating and ventilation systems has been improved. By using two new energy-efficient compressors, it was possible to optimize compressed air consumption.

7.4.4. The following projects are in the implementation phase or in planning • •

The replacement of old light sources with LED lighting is progressing further. A photovoltaic system with an output of approx. 346 kWp and an annual yield of approx. 281,000 kWh is planned for 2021.

EJOT Corporate Carbon Footprint Report 2020

7.5.

Emissions plant Tambach

Number of employees as of 31.12.2020: 549 Units i.a.: Hardening shop, electroplating shop, heading, interlinking, thread rolling, washing units, sorting machines, injection moulding machines, friction welding plants 7.5.1. Total CO2e plant Tambach The total emissions from Scope 1, 2 and 3 increased by 1% compared to 2016. The location has continuously been expanded in recent years. Units, such as the new media centre for the storage of flammable gases, which require approval under the 4th BImSchV (Bundes-Immissionsschutzgesetz - Federal Immission Control Act), were put into operation in early 2018.

Chart 25 and 26

+ 1% total emissions from scope 1, 2 and 3 compared to base year 2016

Chart 25

Share of total emissions:

16% Scope 1 19% Scope 2 65% Scope 3

Chart 26

EJOT Corporate Carbon Footprint Report 2020

7.5.2. Significant emission sources plant Tambach Most significant and directly influenceable emission sources at the location Tambach are emissions from stationary combustion sources and emissions from purchased electricity. Natural gas is needed for the stationary heating systems and infrared radiant heaters as well as for the electroplating unit, hardening furnaces and the combined heat and power plant. Another significant and directly influenceable emission source are purchased goods, such as wire and granulate. Natural gas consumption has increased by an average of 6% over the past 5 years. In contrast, emissions from electricity consumption fell by an average of 2%.

Chart 27 and 28

+ 6% Average annual change in emissions from natural gas consumption

Chart 27

- 2% Average annual change in emissions from electricity consumption

Chart 28

EJOT Corporate Carbon Footprint Report 2020

7.5.3. What have we achieved? • •

The existing energy measurement system was divided into the 3 business areas Thread Forming, EJOSYST and EJOWELD. The combined heat and power plant was optimized by a new circuit of the storage tanks. In addition, an absorption system was installed to generate cold for the ceiling cooling and the zinc flake system.

7.5.4. The following projects are in the implementation phase or in planning • •

•

Installation of a biofilter for the zinc flake exhaust gases. This saves energy. The existing refrigeration system was combined with a new cooling concept, thus optimising the existing refrigeration system. As a result, the absorption system supplies cold not only for the new hardening ovens but also for the existing hardening ovens. A profitability calculation by the specialist company showed potential savings of 204 tons of CO2e per year. This is achieved through lower consumption of electricity and natural gas. The construction of a photovoltaic system is planned for 2022. A system output of at least 400 kWp is planned. Our own electricity generation is then around 330,000 kWh per year.

EJOT Corporate Carbon Footprint Report 2020

7.6.

Emissions Berghausen plant

Number of employees as of 31.12.2020: 162

Units i.a.: Injection moulding machines and other plastic-processing units

7.6.1. Total CO2e Berghausen plant The total emissions Scope 1, 2 and 3 fell by an average of 15% over the past 5 years. Due to production stoppages during the corona pandemic, significantly fewer emissions were emitted in 2020 than in previous years. Chart 29 and 30

- 15% Average annual change in total Scope 1, 2 and 3 emissions

Chart 29

Share of total emissions:

8% Scope 1 22% Scope 2 70% Scope 3

Chart 30

EJOT Corporate Carbon Footprint Report 2020

7.6.2. Significant emission sources Berghausen plant Most significant and directly influenceable emission source at the location Adolf-Böhl-Straße are emissions from purchased electricity and purchased goods, mainly granulate. Emissions from natural gas consumption have increased by an average of 10% over the past 5 years. At the site, natural gas is only required for stationary heating systems. The consumption depends on both the age of the system and the outside temperatures. Chart 31 and 32

+ 10% Average annual change in emissions from natural gas consumption

Chart 31

Emissions from purchased electricity fell by an average of 7% over the past 5 years. Due to production stoppages during the corona pandemic in 2020, significantly fewer emissions were emitted from electricity consumption.

- 7% Average annual change in emissions from electricity consumption

Chart 32

7.6.3. What have we achieved? • •

A new air conditioning concept in the production halls has reduced the number of rejects. The project will also be pursued in 2021. The installation of a new heating system has a positive effect on natural gas consumption at the site.

EJOT Corporate Carbon Footprint Report 2020

7.7.

Emissions Stockwiese and Lahnuferstraße plants

Number of employees in 2020: 293 Plant Stockwiese: Sales company Units i.a.: Powder coating plant, assembly Logistic location Plant Lahnuferstraße Units: Calotte production 7.7.1. Total CO2e plant Stockwiese and Lahnuferstraße The total emissions Scope 1, 2 and 3 increased by an average of 5% over the past 5 years. The downstream transport emissions have also been recorded by our logistics companies since 2019 and are included in the evaluation. Some of the transports do not take place via the Stockwiese location, but are carried out by a logistics company from Gießen.

Chart 33 and 34

+ 5% Average annual change in total Scope 1, 2 and 3 emissions

Chart 33

Share of total emissions:

12% Scope 1 4% Scope 2 84% Scope 3

Chart 34

EJOT Corporate Carbon Footprint Report 2020

7.7.2. Significant emission sources plant Stockwiese and Lahnuferstraße The most important source of emissions at the Lahnuferstraße location are emissions from the purchase of aluminum slit strip for the manufacture of storm washers for the construction industry. There are no other significant sources of emissions at the sites. Emissions from electricity consumption have been reduced by an average of 9% over the past 5 years. Chart 35

- 9% Average annual change in emissions from electricity consumption

Chart 35

7.7.3. What have we achieved? • • • • • • • •

100% change to LED: Logistics, conference rooms. Exterior lighting: Replacement of defective lamps with LED. All hallways lamps in the old building were 100% replaced by LED. In all staff and locker rooms, motion detectors were installed All E14 and E27 lamps were replaced by LED The cross section of air nozzles was reduced At the location Stockwiese, a speed-controlled compressor for generating compressed air was put into operation. A measuring system was firmly installed in various systems at the location Stockwiese. Electricity consumption is thus immediately visualisable using a software. Malfunctions can be reacted to immediately.

7.7.4. The following projects are in the implementation phase or in planning •

The entire conversion of the exterior lighting to LED is planned by the end of 2021.

EJOT Corporate Carbon Footprint Report 2020

7.8.

Emissions EJOT Holding

Number of employees in 2020: EJOT Holding and Herrengarten 239 Central functions

7.8.1. Total CO2e EJOT Holding The system limits of the CCF also include the EJOT Holding. The EJOT vehicle fleet of the Holding employees, domestic and foreign business travels (only air travel) as well as commuting by the Holding employees are accounted for. Total emissions from the mentioned scope categories decreased by approx. 7% compared to the base year 2016. The emissions from air travel could be reduced through the consistent use of modern telecommunication systems.

Chart 36 and 37

- 7% Lower total emissions Scope 1, 2 and 3 compared to the base year 2016

Chart 36

- 68% Lower emissions from air travel compared to the base year 2016

Chart 37

EJOT Corporate Carbon Footprint Report 2020

7.9.

Total emissions international locations

Only emissions from scope 1, direct emissions and scope 2, indirect emissions are considered. Scope 3 emissions from the upstream and downstream value-added chain are currently not accounted for at the international locations. Only the data concerning the significant emissions at the locations are analysed.

7.9.1. Joint Venture location EJOT ATF Mexico Number of employees March 2021: 109 Units i.a.: Hardening shop, heading, thread rolling, washing units, powder coating plant, sorting machines 7.9.2. Total CO2e EJOT ATF Mexico Scope 1 and 2 emissions are considered. In 2018 there was an increased consumption of natural gas in the heat treatment, which is visually reflected in the graphic. Corrective measures were able to correct the error, so that in the following year natural gas consumption leveled off again at a normal level. Significantly fewer emissions were emitted in 2020 than in previous years. Reasons can be attributed to the corona pandemic and the associated production stoppages.

Chart 38

+ 2% Average annual change in Scope 1 and 2 emissions

Chart 38

EJOT Corporate Carbon Footprint Report 2020

7.9.2.1.

Significant emission sources EJOT ATF Mexico

The most significant emission source at the location in Mexico are emissions from purchased electricity. Chart 39

+ 6% Average annual change in emissions from electricity consumption Scope2.1

Chart 39

7.9.2.2.

What have we achieved?

In 2020, no significant environmental and energy goals could be pursued due to production stoppages cause by the corona pandemic.

EJOT Corporate Carbon Footprint Report 2020

7.9.3. EJOT Turkey Number of employees March 2021: 186

Units i.a.: Hardening shop, electroplating shop, heading, thread rolling, washing units, sorting machines 7.9.4. Total CO2e EJOT Turkey The site is one of the largest and best-selling production sites in the EJOT Group. In autumn 2020 it was decided to build a new factory to secure and expand production capacities in Turkey. The work is scheduled to be completed in 2022.

Chart 40

+ 6% Average annual change in emissions from electricity consumption Scope2.1

Chart 40

7.9.4.1.

Significant emission sources EJOT Tezmak

Most significant emission sources are emissions from natural gas and electricity consumption. While natural gas consumption, which is largely attributable to production, has fallen by an average of 6% in recent years, emissions from electricity consumption have increased by an average of 30%. Chart 41 and 42

EJOT Corporate Carbon Footprint Report 2020

- 6% Average annual change in emissions from natural gas consumption Scope 1

Chart 41

+ 30% Average annual change in emissions from electricity consumption Scope2.1

Chart 42

7.9.4.2. •

What have we achieved?

In 2020, a new energy-efficient ventilation system was installed in the heading department

7.9.4.3.

What have we achieved?

For the new building project, energy efficiency analyzes and own electricity use are planned for the years 2021 and 2022. A photovoltaic system with an output of up to 430 kWp will possibly be installed. A combined heat and power plant will be built at the new location for further self-generated electricity. This will generate around 1,500 MWh of electrical energy and thus cover around 15% of the total electricity required.

EJOT Corporate Carbon Footprint Report 2020

7.9.5. EJOT Poland Number of employees March 2021: 286

Units i.a.: Injection moulding machines and other plastic-processing units

7.9.6. Total CO2e EJOT Poland The site in Poland is also one of the largest and top-selling production sites in the EJOT Group. The main plant in Ciasna with its plastics processing plants has been expanded to include additional production areas in recent years. There are also distribution centers in Olszowa. Since 2020, emissions from the electricity purchased have been offset by green electricity certificates. This way the emissions could be reduced significantly.

Chart 43

0 Tons CO2e Scope 2.1

Complete compensation for the electricity purchased through buying of green electricity certificates.

Chart 43

7.9.6.1.

Significant emission sources EJOT Poland

Due to the green electricity certificates, there are no longer any significant emission sources in Scope 1 and 2. The EJOT fleet is also rated as an insignificant source with approx. 150 t CO2e emissions.

EJOT Corporate Carbon Footprint Report 2020

7.9.6.2.

What have we achieved?

•

The optimization measures in the compressed air supply resulted in savings of 12% in relation to electricity consumption.

•

The energy efficiency of the cooling unit in the cooling system could be increased through shading measures. The energy consumption of the system was reduced by 26% compared to 2019.

•

Use of innovative drive systems in injection molding machines can further reduce power consumption.

•

Plastic waste has been reduced through internal training and organizational measures. The aim is to reduce plastic waste and increase the recycling rate.

EJOT Corporate Carbon Footprint Report 2020

7.9.7. EJOT Switzerland Number of employees as of March 2019: 75

Units i.a.: Injection moulding machines and other plastic-processing units

7.9.8. Total CO2e EJOT Switzerland The total emissions Scope 1, and 2 increased by an average of 1% over the past 5 years. However, it was possible to reduce electricity consumption by an average of 2%. Chart 44 and 45

+ 1% Average annual change in total Scope 1 and 2 emissions

Chart 44

- 2% Average annual change in emissions from electricity Scope 2

Chart 45

EJOT Corporate Carbon Footprint Report 2020

7.9.8.1.

Significant emission sources EJOT Switzerland

The location in Switzerland has no significant emission source which is above 500 t CO2e per year. This is amongst others due to the low emission factor. The electricity mix in Switzerland is mainly made up of climate-friendly nuclear energy and a high proportion of hydropower. 7.9.8.2. • •

What have we achieved?

Optimization of compressed air efficiency; the compressed air consumption could be reduced by more than 5% Measures to reduce HDPE production rejects have resulted in plastics production rejects being reduced by over 5%.

EJOT Corporate Carbon Footprint Report 2020

7.9.9. EJOT Sweden Number of employees as of March 2021: 51 Sales company 7.9.10. Total CO2e EJOT Sweden The location in Sweden is a sales company and responsible for the supply of mechanical fasteners. In addition to the commercial business, technical advice is another core task of the location. The total emissions from Scope 1 and 2 have been reduced by an average of 6% in the past few years.

Chart 45

- 6% Average annual change in total Scope 1 and 2 emissions

Chart 45

7.9.10.1.

What have we achieved?

Fluorescent lamps have been replaced with energy-efficient LED lighting systems. This measure

saved around 14,500 kWh of electricity consumption.

EJOT Corporate Carbon Footprint Report 2020

7.9.11. EJOT China Number of employees March 2021: 231

Production of fasteners and injection-moulded parts

7.9.11.1.

Significant emission sources EJOT China

The metal and plastic processing site is one of the top-selling production sites and has a total area of approx. 18,550 m². The main business is with over 90% in the metal products. Total emissions at the location EJOT China in are 4,203 CO2e [t] There are no emissions from natural gas or district heating. Most significant emission source at the location in China are emissions from electricity consumption, 4,165 CO2e [t].

+ 3% More total Scope 1 and 2 missions

7.9.11.2. •

The project “planned time controls on the air conditioning systems” had to be stopped after a one-month test in production, because in summer the outside temperatures did not drop sufficiently during the night and this made the inside temperature of the hall too uncomfortable for the employees.

7.9.11.3. •

What have we achieved?

The following projects are in the implementation phase or in planning

By installing sensor lighting systems, 10% energy can be saved. A cost saving of around 30,000 RMB is expected. The project will start this year.

EJOT Corporate Carbon Footprint Report 2020

8. Assumptions and uncertainties 8.1.

EJOT Germany

Scope 1.1 Direct emissions from stationary combustion processes [natural gas consumption]: There are uncertainties in data transmission. A central monitoring of the natural gas consumption by the UAG department is not yet possible. Scope 1.3 Direct fugitive emissions [leakage loss at cooling systems]: Due to the large number of cooling and air conditioning systems, a general loss of 2% per year and system volume was assumed. All cooling and air conditioning systems that are listed in the documentation for compliance with legal requirements are taken into account. The age of the system is no longer taken into account, as older systems are gradually being replaced by new technology. Large systems which require monitoring, such as cooling systems at the locations Tambach, Berghausen and In der Aue are checked for leakage losses using the existing operation logs. Scope 3.1 Purchased goods and services Considered are wire, granulates, gases, cleaning agents, oils and greases, chemicals, aluminium slit strip, packaging material and purchased goods for the Construction Division in Bad Laasphe. Goods supplied and used by cleaning companies, such as toilet paper, paper towels, cleaning agents, bin liners were assessed for the first time in 2018. However, these emissions are negligible. Only weight quantities are considered. Litres are converted into kilograms. Quantities which were listed in pieces or bottles in the data transmission will not be considered. There are uncertainties in the emission factors. For granulate and wire, an averaged value is used. Scope 3.6 Business travel: The distance calculator luftlinie.org is used for flights. Destination airports for intermediate stops could not be considered. No train trips, taxi trips or rental vehicles were considered. Scope 3.7 Employee commuting: For employee commuting, the distance calculator google maps is used. No carpools have been taken into account. Commuting by foot or bicycle could not be taken into account. As a calculation basis, it was assumed that 1 employee works an average of 220 days. Possible inactive periods due to sick leave, for example, could not be considered. Scope 3.9 Downstream transport emissions An evaluation is carried out by the largest logistics companies for the Herrenwiese, Tambach and Stockwiese locations. The emissions are determined in accordance with ISO 16258. The Scope 3.9 emissions for Germany from 2019 were incorrect and were subsequently estimated and corrected according to the figures from 2020. Scope 3.12 End-of-life treatment of sold products: The basis is the respective sales volume at the locations Herrenwiese, Stockwiese and Berghausen.

EJOT Corporate Carbon Footprint Report 2020

8.2.

International EJOT locations

Only the categories concerning scope 1 direct emissions and 2 indirect emissions from electricity consumption / district heating which are applicable for the locations in Mexico, Poland, Turkey, Switzerland, Sweden and China were surveyed. The responsible environmental management officer sends the data to the central UAG department in Germany. Further information, for example on the economic situation, is also transmitted by the managers of the locations and included in the report. There could be possible uncertainties when collecting the data and entering the data in the default lists. Furthermore, the respective country-specific emission factor could be a possible source of error.

EJOT Corporate Carbon Footprint Report 2020

9. Signatures EJOT Holding management

Christian F. Kocherscheidt Management / President

Wolfgang Bach Management CFO

Angelika Wetzstein Management HR / Legal

Dr. Frank Dratschmidt General management

Ralf Birkelbach Management

Dr. Rolf Künkel Management

Bad Berleburg, 01.05.2021

EJOT Corporate Carbon Footprint Report 2020

10. Contact EJOT Holding GmbH & Co. KG Im Herrengarten 1 D-57319 Bad Berleburg Heiko Stötzel Coordinator environment and occupational health and safety Head of environment department Phone: e-mail:

+49 2751 529 243 HStoetzel@ejot.com

Claudia Schröder Environmental management system DIN EN ISO 14001 Author CCF report Phone: e-mail:

+49 2751 529 6900 CSchroeder@ejot.com

Internet:

www.ejot.de

11. List of abbreviations Abbreviation

Descriptions

CCF CO2e KUA

Corporate Carbon Footprint Carbon dioxide equivalent Coordinator for environment

GHG Protocol GWP

Greenhouse Gas Protocol Global Warming Potential

KPI LED SAP

Key Process Indicator Light-emitting diode lighting system Software für business processes

UAG RFI

Environment department of the EJOT Holding Germany Radiative Forcing Index (increased greenhouse effect from aircraft emissions)

EJOT Corporate Carbon Footprint Report 2020

12. Appendix to the CCF Report 2020 Organisation

Scope acc. GHG

Germany gesamt

1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 2.1 3.1 3.3 3.5 3.6 3.7 3.9 3.12

Description acc. GHG-Protocol

CO2e [t] Base year 2016

CO2e [t] 2017

CO2e [t] 2018

CO2e [t] 2019

CO2e [t] 2020

5.066

5.219

5.514

5.215

5.765

1.063 35 0 12.738 41.635 1.184 120 545 1.688 nicht erhoben

1.003 14 0 11.964 38.013 1.193 113 1.725 2.251 nicht erhoben

1.136 23 0 11.826 38.719 1.214 121 316 2.019 nicht erhoben

989 36 0 12.816 34.972 1.146 151 468 1.861 1.378 765

943 32 0 11.137 31.581 1.142 126 197 1.907 1.475 450

Direct emissions from stationary combustion sources Direct emissions from mobile combustion sources Direct fugitive emissions Direct emissions: Physical or chemical processing Indirect emissions from the use of purchased electricity Purchased goods and services Indirect emissons: Fuel- and energy-related activities Indirect emissions: Waste generated in operations Indirect emissions: Business travel Indirect emissions: Employee commuting Downstream transport and distribution Indirect emissions: End-of-life treatment of sold products

Sum Germany Organisation In der Aue

Scope acc. GHG

Description acc. GHG-Protocol

1.1 1.2 1.3 2.1 3.1 3.3 3.5 3.6 3.7

Direct emissions from stationary combustion sources Direct emissions from mobile combustion sources Direct fugitive emissions Indirect emissions from the use of purchased electricity Purchased goods and services Indirect emissons: Fuel- and energy-related activities Indirect emissions: Waste generated in operations Indirect emissions: Business travel Indirect emissions: Employee commuting

64.074

61.495

60.888

59.798

54.754

CO2e [t] Base year 2016

CO2e [t] 2017

CO2e [t] 2018

CO2e [t] 2019

CO2e [t] 2020

159 26 1 1.445 3.416 91 13 4 149

175 47 0 1.347 2.927 91 13 1 135

258 67 1 1.282 3.133 96 13 6 123

194 43 4 1.484 3.218 95 14 9 118

172 30 1 1.448 3.626 94 15 4 134

5.303

4.737

4.979

5.178

5.522

CO2e [t] 2017

CO2e [t] 2018

CO2e [t] 2019

CO2e [t] 2020

831 95 2,0 0,1 2.059 659 198 21 51 286

817 117 5,9 0,1 1.971 37 192 22 56 279

780 43 6,5 0,1 1.912 777 171 23 39 273

561 30 6 0 1.448 26 123 19 20 272

4.201

3.497

4.025

2.506

CO2e [t] 2017

CO2e [t] 2018

CO2e [t] 2019

CO2e [t] 2020

1.029 286 4

945 316 7

2.883 14.676 247 36 94 509

2.737 10.899 255 47 97 768

2.872 12.046 254 54 47 641

1.200 295 7 0 3.243 10.468 249 47 69 603 632 123

1.084 209 7 0 3.101 9.532 256 48 37 576 622 109

Sum In der Aue Organisation Untere Bienhecke

Scope acc. GHG

Description acc. GHG-Protocol

1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 2.1 3.1 3.3 3.5 3.6 3.7

CO2e [t] Base year 2016 766 138 6,9 0,1 2.353 972 201 23 76 205

Sum Untere Bienhecke Organisation Herrenwiese

4.740 Scope acc. GHG

Description acc. GHG-Protocol

1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 2.1 3.1 3.3 3.5 3.6 3.7 3.9 3.12

CO2e [t] Base year 2016 948 304 8

Sum Herrenwiese Organisation Tambach

Scope acc. GHG

Description acc. GHG-Protocol

1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 2.1 3.1 3.3 3.5 3.6 3.7 3.9 3.12

19.705

16.122

17.182

16.935

15.580

CO2e [t] Base year 2016

CO2e [t] 2017

CO2e [t] 2018

CO2e [t] 2019

CO2e [t] 2020

2.694 88 3,6 0,0 4.564 13.142 517 41 48 300

2.706 115 3,0 0,0 4.427 15.269 255 25 43 370

3.004 150 3,3 0,1 4.288 14.436 254 25 35 332

3.000 112 7 0 4.760 12.518 508 60 73 315 151 148

3.435 79 7 0 4.094 12.989 486 46 30 317 151 161

21.397

23.214

22.526

21.354

21.633

Sum Tambach

EJOT Corporate Carbon Footprint Report 2020

Organisation Adolf-Böhl-Straße

Scope acc. GHG

Description acc. GHG-Protocol

1.1 1.2 1.3 2.1 3.1 3.3 3.5 3.6 3.7 3.12

CO2e [t] Base year 2016 180 67 10 1.152 6.111 78 4 57 113

Sum Adolf-Böhl-Straße Organisation

Scope acc. GHG

Description acc. GHG-Protocol

Stockwiese / Lahnuferstraße

1.1

Direct emissions from stationary combustion sources

1.2 1.3 2.1 3.1 3.3 3.5 3.6 3.7 3.9 3.12

Direct emissions from mobile combustion sources Direct fugitive emissions Indirect emissions from the use of purchased electricity Purchased goods and services Indirect emissons: Fuel- and energy-related activities Indirect emissions: Waste generated in operations Indirect emissions: Business travel Indirect emissions: Employee commuting Downstream transport and distribution Indirect emissions: End-of-life treatment of sold products

Organisation

Scope acc. GHG

Description acc. GHG-Protocol

Herrengarten / Kurhaus

1.1 1.3 2.1 3.3 3.5

EJOT ATF Mexico

EJOT Poland

5.897

3.688

CO2e [t] 2017

CO2e [t] 2018

CO2e [t] 2019

CO2e [t] 2020

206

199

162

213

212

323 5 281 3.316 36 4 82 211

293 2 252 3.318 40 3 725 281

320 3 248 3.681 30 3 30 275

342 3 221 3.764 31 3 79 243 523

411 2 192 2.779 28 4 43 249 744 215

4.464

5.113

4.751

5.422

4.878

CO2e [t] Base year 2016

CO2e [t] 2017

CO2e [t] 2018

CO2e [t] 2019

CO2e [t] 2020

Direct emissions from stationary combustion sources

113

101

105

103

104

Direct fugitive emissions Indirect emissions from the use of purchased electricity Indirect emissons: Fuel- and energy-related activities Indirect emissions: Waste generated in operations

61 14 0,2

53 12 0,1

53 13 0,2

53 12 0,2

0 50 11 0

188

167

171

168

164

CO2e [t] 2017

CO2e [t] 2018

CO2e [t] 2019

CO2e [t] 2020

123

125

120

183 202

755 266

120 245

132 193

162 2 57 252

502

1.144

489

445

472

CO2e [t] 2016

CO2e [t] 2017

CO2e [t] 2018

CO2e [t] 2019

CO2e [t] 2020

394 53 818

513 58 819

970 75 1.002

388 141 982

81 132 1.015

Scope acc. GHG

Description acc. GHG-Protocol

1.2 3.3 3.6 3.7

Direct emissions from mobile combustion sources Indirect emissons: Fuel- and energy-related activities Indirect emissions: Business travel Indirect emissions: Employee commuting

CO2e [t] Base year 2016 117

Scope acc. GHG

Description acc. GHG-Protocol

1.1 1.2 2.1

Direct emissions from stationary combustion sources Direct emissions from mobile combustion sources Indirect emissions from the use of purchased electricity

Scope acc. GHG

Description acc. GHG-Protocol

1.1 1.2 1.3 2.1

Direct emissions from stationary combustion sources Direct emissions from mobile combustion sources Direct fugitive emissions Indirect emissions from the use of purchased electricity

Sum Poland Organisation EJOT Turkey

Scope acc. GHG

Description acc. GHG-Protocol

1.1 1.2 1.3 2.1

Direct emissions from stationary combustion sources Direct emissions from mobile combustion sources Direct fugitive emissions Indirect emissions from the use of purchased electricity

Sum Turkey Organisation EJOT Switzerland

Scope acc. GHG

Description acc. GHG-Protocol

1.1 1.2 1.3 2.1

Direct emissions from stationary combustion sources Direct emissions from mobile combustion sources Direct fugitive emissions Indirect emissions from the use of purchased electricity

Sum Switzerland Organisation EJOT Sweden

Scope acc. GHG

Description acc. GHG-Protocol

1.2 2.1 2.2

Direct emissions from mobile combustion sources Indirect emissions from the use of purchased electricity Indirect emissions from long distance heating

Sum Sweden Organisation EJOT China

Scope acc. GHG 1.2 1.3 2.1

255 24 2 811 2.397 65 3 5 111 15

7.000

Sum EJOT ATF Mexico Organisation

CO2e [t] 2020

223 34 2 1.143 4.227 80 4 68 116

6.529

Sum Holding

Organisation

CO2e [t] 2019

223 41 2 1.113 5.388 83 3 22 124

7.773

Sum Herrengarten / Kurhaus

Holding

CO2e [t] 2018

178 44 2 1.089 4.938 77 4 53 144

CO2e [t] Base year 2016

Sum Stockwiese / Lahnuferstraße

Organisation

CO2e [t] 2017

Description acc. GHG-Protocol Direct emissions from mobile combustion sources Direct fugitive emissions Indirect emissions from the use of purchased electricity

Sum China

1.264

1.389

2.047

1.511

1.228

CO2e [t] 2016

CO2e [t] 2017

CO2e [t] 2018

CO2e [t] 2019

CO2e [t] 2020

98 180

94 183

96 189

83 170

2.030

2.673

2.871

3.503

91 157 15 0

2.308

2.951

3.156

3.757

263

CO2e [t] 2016

CO2e [t] 2017

CO2e [t] 2018

CO2e [t] 2019

CO2e [t] 2020

1.448 133

1.383 116

1.422 278

1.422 166 1.019

1.076 124 1 1.925

773

935

1.033

2.353

2.434

2.733

2.607

3.126

CO2e [t] 2016

CO2e [t] 2017

CO2e [t] 2018

CO2e [t] 2019

CO2e [t] 2020

49 52

71 68

53 81

67 81

50 59 6 75

185

231

221

232

190

CO2e [t] 2016

CO2e [t] 2017

CO2e [t] 2018

CO2e [t] 2019

CO2e [t] 2020

105 10 113

124 10 91

110 10 91

84 5 97

228

225

211

186

CO2e [t] 2016

CO2e [t] 2017

CO2e [t] 2018

CO2e [t] 2019

CO2e [t] 2020

76 1 3.995

37 0 4.165

4.072

4.203