Online at ELDIABLONEWS.COM
El Diablo Voice of the Students Durango High School
2390 Main Ave.
Durango CO 81301
Issue six
Volume Sixty-Three May 2018
Closed campus debate: Parents disagree with student & staff consensus
Girls’ locker room disparity Page 9
El Diablo Speaks: closed campus
Page 4
College Map: Seniors take the next step DHS sophomores Grace Meyer, Emma Bryant, and Jordan Taylor enjoy lunch at Three Peaks Deli & Grill during their lunch hour.
CALEB SIMONS AND HANNAH WILLS Reporters In the wake of nationally covered shootings such as in Parkland, FL, and the shooting closer to home in Aztec, NM, the Durango 9R school district, students, parents, and community members are evaluating new security measures in order to create the safest and most reasonable atmosphere at DHS. The conflicting opinions on safety have forced all options to be explored. Some groups advocate for drastic reforms, such as Parent for Safer Schools, which has put forward a four-pronged approach that they believe will make schools safer. They’ve explored many options, some proving to be more popular than others. Their top priorities consist of metal detectors, a closed campus at DHS, armed officers, and installing a visitor management security system. Tim Maher, the spokesperson for the group, finds that metal detectors have the most potential to increase the security of DHS. “When you look at the statistics, only one school shooting has occurred at a school with metal detectors,” said Maher. Maher believes that the biggest reason to close DHS’ campus for lunch is that metal detectors would make entry to the school more difficult and time consuming, so it would make sense to not let students out of school for lunch. He acknowledges that it’s unpleasant to give up 50 minutes of personal freedom,
but maintains that it’s an important piece of the puzzle to make DHS safer. “If 90% of schools out there can deal with a closed campus, we can too,” said Maher. Maher cited statistics from the National Center for Education Statistics, but research by multiple El Diablo reporters failed to corroborate these numbers. Some estimates place the number of high schools with closed campuses at 60-70%. Dan Snowberger, 9R superintendent, has a different opinion than Parents For Safer Schools. He finds that metal detectors have little effect on school security, and that the associated logistical problems clearly outweigh the limited benefits that they offer. “When you look at the number of people who are on campus after hours, the idea of metal detectors in operation at all times of the day is really not a feasible option,” said Snowberger. In addition, Snowberger points to other organizations that use metal detectors to show that they are ineffective as security measures. “When you look at the TSA and their metal detector approach,” said Snowberger, “they fail to up to 90% of the time.” Instead, the Superintendent has pursued measures such as ballistic film on windows and increased security staff to make DHS and other schools around the district safer. The statistics that Snowberger cites here originate from an experiment that the
Hannah Wills
Department of Homeland Security conducted, where agents from the department smuggled weapons and contraband past the TSA. They successfully smuggled weapons and explosives past the TSA metal detectors and personnel 95% of the time. Meanwhile, Durango 9R’s Safety and Security Coordinator, Kathy Morris, is exploring all of the possibilities in order to keep DHS a safe area of learning. Instead of having a completely closed campus, Morris proposed that only ninth graders should have a closed campus. “We need to trust our kids, [but] should ninth graders come in and be given something that they haven’t earned? Incoming ninth graders need to earn their right as the rest of the upperclassmen have earned just by being here,” said Morris. “It is about coming in first year into a high school, there are some things that you have to earn: respect. You need a year of getting your feet on the ground and understand the expectations of your academic goals, athletic goals, social goals.” Morris also strongly believes that the students need to have a voice in these decisions because it is their school and they know what is going on everyday. Adults try to understand what is going on, but students are the only ones that are truly aware of the situations and actions at school. “It is your school! What do you guys need? What do you guys want?” Morris exclaimed. “This is your campus, you need to keep it safe...what is keeping you
Page 16 safe is you guys.” The PSS group is experiencing a significant amount of pushback from students revolving around closed campus. So. Emmy Romero expresses concerns deeper than just losing the ability to be able to leave for lunch. “I am against closed campus [because] there wouldn’t be any clubs, because it would be [that] each grade has a different lunch and it’s not possible that our school would be able to have all grades have the same lunch, we don’t have that space. There would be a lot more tension if the whole grade was in one area at one time every single day,” said Romero. Based on a survey done at DHS, less than a third of the staff supported a closed campus. According to students, a closed campus would significantly change the atmosphere at DHS due to rising conflicts, as a result of these unwanted changes and the pent up tension of being in a confined space. “I feel like we would be more divided if we had closed campus because if you have friends in different grades you won’t be able to see them at lunch time, if you have a sibling you’re not going to be able to go out to lunch with them,” Romero said. Definite changes have yet to be enacted- but as new options are explored, students should continue to express their concerns in order to keep DHS safe.
New face of identity theft: teenagers blasé about privacy BRYN VALDEZ Reporter
In the modern age, devices and online services have become the new face of identity theft. The stereotypical masked hacker has been replaced by handy technology. The only difference: no information is being stolen illegally. “When you read the fine print, it absolutely says it will use your data and give it to other companies for surveys and other business,” said Sr. Damien Linscott. Companies such as Facebook, Google, and Amazon have all gained a reputation in recent years for being innovative in their ventures into smart living and advertising. In fact, most companies of the sort have started to harvest data from customers for the purpose of capital gain. “They can target ads, which isn’t always a bad thing because if I was interested in something I would want to know about it through advertisements or the content I watch,” said Linscott. However, in some instances, companies cross the line into uncomfortable territory. For example, most consumers would agree that selling information to political organizations or filing for the right to record them constantly, is overstepping a company’s bounds. “I think the amount of technology that’s progressed is impressive, but it’s gotten to the point where the amount of
information they have on you is creepy,” said Jr. Riley Mata. Currently, Facebook is under fire for exposing data to a political consulting firm working with the 2016 Trump campaign called Cambridge Analytica. This left over 80 million Americans’ personal information compromised to an external organization. “I think for being such big and successful companies, they’re abusing the power they have over Americans,” said Mata. In addition, Consumer Watchdog recently exposed the fact that home assistants such as Alexa or Google have filed patents in order to record your home activity around the clock. This would mean Alexa would have data regarding your daily habits and conversations among other things. “I know that having access to information at your fingertips is really awesome, but it’s also extremely distracting. I think it goes back to the ‘Big Brother’ concept which has terrifyingly enough, kind of come true,” said science teacher Sarah Nashleanas. Despite disagreeing with their handling of private information, many consumers return to use the service repeatedly. This may be partly due to the fact that this technology has become ingrained into our way of life, making it difficult to become less dependant on it. “It’s an addiction. It’s this instant gratification for information that from a scientific perspective, makes dopamine
Bryn Valdez Large tech companies such as Facebook have access to an immense amount of consumer
levels rise, so they have us on a chemical level,” said Nashleanas. Younger generations, it seems, are especially susceptible to a breach in their privacy. Too often do they excuse privacy agreements and terms of service, and in turn, put themselves in harm’s way. “We have to be taught these social norms about how to deal with social media, and it’s not being explicitly taught. That might be the responsibility of parents, teachers, community members or maybe a combination of all of them, but there are no rules to follow,” said Nashleanas. With that said, the future of the
May 2018
public’s privacy remains unknown. Many factors contribute to deciding how private information will be handled, but it will ultimately be the consumer’s responsibility to protect themselves in the digital age. “In the future, the laws may be more clear because people are getting fed up, which means either the ads are more specifically targeted or more heavily warranted,” said Linscott. After all, research shows that only 22% of Americans fully believe that large corporations handle their data in a trustworthy manner, meaning it is only a matter of time before the companies are forced to stop avoiding confrontation.