![](https://assets.isu.pub/document-structure/230518074931-140be0cd911ea816df7d6ee14af4151e/v1/c4629917203e4cc3123ed1e576d707cc.jpeg?width=720&quality=85%2C50)
1 minute read
REFLECTION
Due to not obtaining enough information regarding his brand, I believe that Velasquez is no longer a feasible fit currently for my FMP. Despite not going forward with this avenue, unearthing a more obscure and youthful designer proved beneficial as the emerging possess fresh perspectives and visions for the industry, which I can source influence from. It was interesting to evaluate his ‘protesting’ approach to fashion and how he adapts it to a younger market, especially when reflecting on societal happenings of today too. This, alongside his styling, will definitely be acknowledged for future reference if my concept is to remain of similar categorisation.
I felt Velasquez’s work was too similar to my other suggested collaborator, Charles Jeffrey, and in merging them both it wouldn’t furnish a robust outcome which catered to a viable gap in the market. Taking Charles Jeffrey forward appears to be an appropriate way of preserving aspects of Velasquez’ style, whilst integrating his additional inspirations and methods of working.
Advertisement
![](https://assets.isu.pub/document-structure/230518074931-140be0cd911ea816df7d6ee14af4151e/v1/f68888a84325e9a523f0943a91742b19.jpeg?width=720&quality=85%2C50)