Green ATM Welcoming remarks Alain Siebert, Chief Environment & Economist Amsterdam – 9 March 2011
Agenda 9:30
Welcoming remarks Alain Siebert, Chief Economist & Environment, SESAR Joint Undertaking
9:35
SESAR’s environmental approach Célia Alves Rodrigues, Environment Officer, SESAR Joint Undertaking
9:45
Strategic fit Pierre Caussade, Senior Vice President Environment & Sustainable Development, Air France
10:00
Quick wins: Examples from the field Oceanic/En-Route: Rudy y Kellar,, Vice President Operations, p , NAV Canada Terminal: Evert Westerveld, AIRE Project Manager, LVNL Surface: Robin Onghena, DSNA
Page 2
1
Agenda 10:45
What comes thereafter: moving towards the perfect flight with SESAR Captain Peter Larsson, Airspace User Lead Expert for Project B4.2, S Scandinavian di i Ai Airlines li
11:00
Final word and end of technical workshop Alain Siebert, Chief Economist & Environment, SESAR Joint Undertaking END
Page 3
SESAR Environmental Approach ATC Global 2011 Green ATM workshop – 9 March 2011 Célia Alves Rodrigues – Environment Officer
2
Build a new ATM system that is able to meet future mobility needs while protecting the environment
Page 5
Main Opportunities • One programme: collaboration and inclusiveness • Building a compelling Environmental Case, driver to secure industry buy-in • Support the development of adequate standards and ▪ Sustainable development p and g global regulation to support emissions on top of the political deployment agenda • Practical/fact oriented ▪ ATM enhancements are the main approach opportunity to reduce aviation's footprint before 2020 – confirmed by • Innovative thinking a recent study
Page 6
3
Environment is a priority for SESAR Three Layer Environmental Approach 1. Implement greener practices in p g p the workplace and reduce SJU’s environmental footprint (not presented) 2. Principles to be applied to the SESAR R&D programme
3. Incremental SESAR deployment and monitoring
High Level Environment Objectives SESAR should be recognised as the most environmentally - conscious ATM development programme in the world Enable 10% fuel savings per flight as a result of ATM improvements alone Improve the role of ATM in developing environmental rules
Be the driver of change! Page 8
4
R&D
Ensure that Environment is treated as a priority inside the Programme Page 9
SJU management response •
•
• • • •
Ensure progress & facilitate collaborative decisions M i h effectiveness ff i Monitor the of the R&D activities to define environmental rules Gate to gate environmental considerations Develop the SESAR label Validation close to operations Monitor other research projects Page 10
5
SESAR programme level – Projects (1/2) •
80% of SESAR projects address environmental issues directly or indirectly
•
Establish & monitor environmental performance targets and indicators
•
Develop compelling environment cases
•
Support decision making
Page 11
SESAR programme level – Projects (2/2) •
Advanced validation methodology ensuring endto-end to e d co consideration s de at o o of environmental aspects in all R&D activities
•
Focus on data collection in the field versus use of models/simulations
•
Consideration of environmental trade-offs – noise / CO2 in parallel Page 12
6
AIRE - Atlantic Interoperability Initiative to Reduce Emissions •
Capitalize on present aircraft capabilities
•
P id best b t practices ti Provide and success stories
•
Demonstrate benefits by performing flight trials
•
Accelerate transition to implementation
•
Mapping of AIRE projects with SESAR projects
•
A pragmatic transatlantic partnership Page 13
AIRE Expansion • Expand – more regions & partners • More focused taking into account previous AIRE results and SESAR developments • Full integration in overall SESAR validation roadmap lid ti d • Disseminate AIRE best practices Page 14
7
Incremental SESAR deployment and monitoring
Ensure the deployment and effective use of new and greener ATM technologies Page 15
2012 objectives • Initial 4D trajectory is validated in an operational environment supported by satellite-based t h l technology • 5,000 flights, including 500 military, are SESAR labelled • SESAR benefits are demonstrated on city pairs connecting 8 European airports • Airspace users have signed up to the SESAR business case (including the environment case) for time-based operations Page 16
8
Proposed Approach •
Compelling Environment case is developed for first SESAR deployment Packages (applicable from 2013)
•
Deliver early R&D results enabled fuel burn reductions of approximately 2% in 2012 (baseline 2010)
•
Reduce taxi out by 1 minute per departure in major airports
•
Assess CO2 footprint of current noise abatement procedures Page 17
Conclusions • Environment is a priority for SESAR • Ambitious environmental targets • ATM Master Plan is our common roadmap to success • PPP works and is a unique opportunity to introduce change • Validation as close as possible to the operational environment • Capitalizing on present aircraft capabilities p matter to us: concrete and local p partnerships demonstration of results now with AIRE
Lets make it happen together! Page 18
9
Thank you …
www.sesarju.eu EUROPEAN COMMISSION
Strategic fit Pierre Caussade – Air France
10
KEY ISSUES FOR A SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT Pierre Caussade Senior VP Environment and Sustainable Development Air France
ATC Global 2011 Amsterdam – 09 March 2011
Some key figures for Air France-KLM
1 Group, 2 companies Revenues (2009-10) = 21 billion € Workforce (31.12.09) Ground Staff : 73 000 Flight Attendant : 26 000 Cockpit Crew : 9 200 Fleet : 594 aircraft Network : 236 destinations within 107 countries
3 businesses 71 millions passengers 1.5 millions tons of cargo Engineering and Maintenance customers : 150 airlines worldwide
Founding member of the SkyTeam alliance ATC Global 2011 Amsterdam – 09 March 2011
11
Addressing five key issues for a sustainable development
Combating climate change
Minimizing our environmental impacts
Building a sustainable relationship with our customers
Promoting a responsible human resources policy
Driving local development
ATC Global 2011 Amsterdam – 09 March 2011
Combating climate change
Our Climate Action Plan : We modernize our fleet We optimize our daily operations We promote research programs (aircraft, engines, alternative fuels, ATM…) We activelyy contribute to international negotiations g in order to reach a global agreement under the umbrella of ICAO We support environmental programs led by NGO’s ATC Global 2011 Amsterdam – 09 March 2011
12
Combating climate change
Some key figures :
1 ton fuel burnt
2 to 3 % of global man-made CO2 emissions
=
3 15 tons 3.15 of CO2 emitted
3.8 95
liters/passenger/100 km gCO2/passenger/km
AF KLM fuel efficiency
ATC Global 2011 Amsterdam – 09 March 2011
Combating climate change
Manufacturers, airlines, airports and ANSPs bodies have jointly and globally committed to specific goals to cut aviation-related CO2 emissions : by 2020, to improve energy efficiency by 1.5% a year from 2020, to ensure the stabilization of CO2 emissions and further
neutral carbon growth
by 2050, 50% reduction of CO2 emissions compared to 2005 levels
ATC Global 2011 Amsterdam – 09 March 2011
13
Key factors for CO2 emissions reduction (source : IATA)
KEY
ATC Global 2011 Amsterdam – 09 March 2011
An other key issue : to minimize noise pollution
We promote ICAO “balanced approach” : Cutting noise at source Operating noise abatement procedures Regulating land-use around airports Restricting operations ATC Global 2011 Amsterdam – 09 March 2011
14
Focus on ATM issues
We fully support SESAR and NextGen research Programs We are proud to have been fully committed to SESAR since day 1 AF operates first “green flight” from Europe to USA
(part of AIRE program) – 6 april 2010 But we need to go FURTHER Quick wins Pragmatic developments : low investment but significant results
ATC Global 2011 Amsterdam – 09 March 2011
Conclusion
Finally, what is at stake ? Our licence to grow !
“We strive to achieve sustainable development through financial social and environmental excellence” financial, excellence Jean-Cyril Spinetta Chairman of Air France-KLM
ATC Global 2011 Amsterdam – 09 March 2011
15
Quick wins: examples from the field Rudy Kellar – NAV Canada Evert Westerveld – LVNL Robin Onghena - DSNA
16
Background • SESAR Joint Undertaking (SJU) 2007 Modernization
of European ATM system Coordinates relevant research
• AIRE (Atlantic Interoperability Initiative to Reduce Emissions) Managed
by SJU and FAA Accelerate pace of Performance-Based Performance Based Operation Implement fuel efficient procedures - all flight phases Capitalize on current aircraft capabilities and best practices
Opportunity Lead: NAV CANADA Partners: Air France, NATS
• Assess and trial flights over North Atlantic • Identify and prioritize ATM procedures and systems for potential to reduce GHG emissions • Participating airlines: Air
Canada United Airlines British Airways Delta
17
ENGAGE Corridor Solution EUROPE – NORTH AMERICA Go ADS-B for a GREENER ENVIRONMENT
Current Operations
18
ENGAGE: Opportunity on the NAT • Promote: Collaboration Technology Best
Practices
• More efficient operations • Improve performance • Opportunity to re-think and modify North Atlantic traffic
Track Structure: without expanded surveillance
Altitude
19
Š AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document.
Š AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document.
East Coast ADS-B
Track Structure: with expanded surveillance
Surveillance Airspace
*
Altitude
*
*Targets of opportunity to vary altitude & Mach
20
How Do We Achieve This? ADVANCED OCEANIC ATC SYSTEMS
© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document.
NATS = SAATS
NAV CANADA = GAATS+
A Collaborative Approach …to keeping an eye on aviation and the environment ANSP: NAV CANADA
© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document.
ANSP: NATS
CUSTOMERS: AIR FRANCE
ADVANCED TECHNOLOGIES
21
ENGAGE Trial Dates • Demonstration Flights g - 2010 June:
World Environment Day November: AIRE A380
• Phase 1 – Approved December 2010 Pre-ops
validation & proof of concept NAT flight trials
© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document.
• Phase 2 – Spring 2011 Operational
flight trials (possible multiple flights) Multiple flight simulation trials Flight data analysis Fuel burn and GHG results - Summer 2011
Next Steps • Review flight trial results • Compile p and analyze y data • Proactive communications: GHG emissions Efficiency benefits
© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document.
Achievable
• An invitation to Montréal, Montréal Canada Trial results to date and findings May 2011
22
© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document.
© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document.
A Powerful Thought…. “Collaboration Collaboration equals innovation.” Michael Dell
CIFER
23
© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document.
© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document.
CIFER - Looking Ahead
For more information:
www navcanada ca www.navcanada.ca
24
SESAR Technical Sessions
Green ATM Quicks wins, examples from the field
Schiphol AIRE trial Trajectory Based Night Time CDA’s Evert Westerveld LVNL, ATC the Netherlands Sheet 49
The Challenge • Night “Transitions” (CDA from FL70) in place since mid 90’s • Inbound “long haul wave” between 04:00 am and 05:30 am LT • Bunching effects (with subsequent vectoring and holding) during “bad nights” Sheet 50
25
The Challenge Current night time procedures
Sheet 51
The Challenge Example of current night time ops 03:55 LT
Sheet 52
26
The Challenge Example of current night time ops 04:00 LT
Sheet 53
The Challenge Example of current night time ops 04:05 LT
Sheet 54
27
The Challenge Example of current night time ops 04:10 LT
Sheet 55
The Challenge Example of current night time ops 04:15 LT
Sheet 56
28
The Challenge Example of current night time ops 04:20 LT
Sheet 57
The Challenge Example of current night time ops 04:25 LT
Sheet 58
29
The Challenge Example of current night time ops 04:30 LT
Sheet 59
The Challenge Example of current night time ops 04:35 LT
Sheet 60
30
The Challenge Example of current night time ops 04:40 LT
Sheet 61
The Challenge Example of current night time ops 04:45 LT
Sheet 62
31
The Project • Optimization of existing night time OPS • Pre-planning and sequencing of flights • Taking benefits from trajectory information exchange • Cutting excess trackmiles and level segments • Increasing percentage of top-of-descent type CDA’s Sheet 63
The Concept 1. Automatic Connected Aircraft (= 80 %)
ACARS DL
SITA / ARINC MQ message set KLM OCC
ACC exec
Pre-Planner Operator
32
The Concept 2. Web Connected Aircraft (= 10 plus %)
ACARS DL
SITA / ARINC Delta OCC
ACC exec
Pre-Planner Operator Web Interface
The Concept 3. Non Connected Aircraft (= 10 minus %)
Radio Telephony
Coordination by telephone
ACC exec
Pre-Planner Operator
MUAC / NATS
33
The Pre-Planner
Sheet 67
Status early March 2011 • • • • •
Receiving live KLM trajectory data Technical testing completed Traffic analysis phase starting up Procedures documentation @ 80% Planning of first OPS tests in progress
Sheet 68
34
Trial Planning Phase 3: Tuning pre-planner in operations April 8 – Sept 30, 2011
Phase 4: Full functional test (alt/spd restricted) October 2011
Phase 5: Emission Reduction Trial November 2011
Sheet 69
Work to be done‌ Definition of Nominal Agreed Routes
Sheet 70
35
Organizations to acknowledge‌
Atlantic Initiative to Reduce Emissions
ATC GLOBAL 2011 SESAR TECHNICAL SESSIONS MARCH 9, 2011
36
AIRE 2009/ 2010/2011 – CDG Surface Trials Performance of flight trials validating solutions for the reduction of CO2 emissions
Olivier DELAIN
Robin ONGHENA
Laurent RENOU
CDG Surface Trials initiatives • Three initiatives have been addressed in 2009: • “Departure taxiing with one or two engines off” Minimising arrival taxi time time” • “Minimising • “Reduction of departure taxi time” Identification Evaluation Title Dates Evaluation 1 Departure taxiing with one or two engines off March 22 to April 10, 2009 Evaluation 2 Minimising arrival taxi time April 14 to April 24, 2009 Evaluation 3a Reduction of departure taxi time (Phase A) June 02 to June 09, 2009 Evaluation 3b Reduction of departure taxi time (Phase B) October 19 to October 22, 2009
Flights 16 28 6 309
37
Reduction of departure taxi time Context and Objectives 1
2
Minimise the RWY pressure while guaranteeing a sufficient number of aircraft at RWY entries so RWY entries so that the the RWY controller can optimise the management of RWY
Ensure consistency with CFMU slot if any Manage the taxi time to 3 sequence pushback times and ensure that the aircraft arrives at runway threshold at calculated times
4
Avoid too many aircraft in taxiways to increase safety, reduce stop and go, lower waiting times at RWY threshold, thus reducing fuel consumption and CO2 emissions 5
Benefits Analysis of GLD process (Arthur D.Little, 2007):
Anticipate capacity increase by having a buffer of aircraft ready For departure
Reduction of waiting time at RWY: 1700T of fuel/ year (Air France) Reduction of taxi time from stand to holding point: 2300 T of fuel /year (Air France)
DMAN
RWY capacity, RWY pressure, RWY configuration
STPV (Flight Data Processing System)
TOBT, TSAT DPI
GLD algorithm
SARIA
DPI Generator CTOT
TOBT
TSAT
Alerts
CDM@CDG website
p y Airport and Airlines Systems CTOT: Calculated Take Off Time DPI: Departure Planning Information message GLD: Gestion Locale des Départs (Implementing Pre-Departure Sequence Concept) SARIA: Système d’Allocation de Ressources et Informations Aéroportuaires (ADP airport database) STPV: Système Traitement Plans de Vols (French FDPS) TOBT: Target Off Block Time (time at which an AO or GH estimates will be ready -all doors closed, boarding bridges removed and pushback vehicle available - and ready to start up/pushback immediately upon reception of clearance from the TWR (CDM implementation. Manual) TSAT: Target Start Up Approval Time (The time provided by ATC taking into account TOBT, CTOT and/or the traffic situation that an aircraft can expect start up / push back approval)
38
AIRE and PDS Three main AIRE steps in parallel of PDS full implementation: 1. The green flight: several tests during 2009 and 2010 (AIRE 1) 2 The GLD evaluation from oct, 2. oct 19th to Oct 22th 2009 (AIRE 1) 3. Greener airports under adverse conditions (AIRE 2)
CDM@CDG project status: The commissioning of DMANHMI , linked with PDS system, is in operation (live) from November 9, 2010 at Paris Charles de Gaulle airport. After Munich and Brussels,, CDG is a labelled CDM airport p ((IP1)) since November 16, 2010 (00:00 utc).
The scope of operational situations covered by this project includes Planned RWY closure, Low Visibility Operations, Situations where all aircraft have to de‐ice, Snow conditions
Greener Airports under Adverse Conditions
39
DMAN general interface for the Clearance Delivery Position
DMAN specific interface for TWR supervisor
40
What comes thereafter: moving towards the perfect flight with SESAR Captain Peter Larsson – Scandanavian Airlines
41
A successful flight with SESAR - from an airline perspective
2011-03-09 Peter Larsson Flight Captain, Scandinavian Airlines AU lead B4.2
BDT, Business Development Trajectory • Months or years before flight • Not shared outside the airline • Gradual iterations and refinement (within the airline)
ARN 08.10
05MAY2025
CPH 07.00
42
SBT, Shared Business Trajectory • User preferred and PBO, Performance Based Operation with minimum cost and environmental load. Both CPH and ARN will likely be ”managed” airspace with separation service. • Shared with ATM system • Gradual iterations and refinements between airline and ATM system ARN 08.10 08.15
CPH 07.00 07.05
SBT, Shared Business Trajectory 07.36
07.48 08.04:30 08.02 07.28
ARN 08.09 08.15
07.21
CPH 07.05 07.17
43
SBT, Shared Business Trajectory
07.37 07.36 07.50 07.48
08.04:30 08.02
07.28
ARN 08.09 08.15 08.17 08.11
07.21
Gradual iterations and refinements into :
CPH
N50074E009303.0,R,2032,N54370E011559,4000,132814.0,,,N55134E012293,4000,133349.0,,,N55224E0 12377,4000,133512.0,,,N55332E012479,4000,133651.0,R,2034,N55484E013024,4000,133912.0,,,N560 76E013272,4000,134225.0,,,N56203E013440,4000,134434.0,,,N56339E014020,4000,134651.0,,,N5645 9E014185,4000,134853.0,,,N57216E015078,4000,135458.0,,,N57544E015553,4000,140038.9,,,N58064 E016132,4000,140243.0,,,N58167E016287,3539,140433.B,,,N58184E016312,3449,140451.0,R,1192,N5 8563E017301,1900,141232.A,,,N59091E017539,1900,141541.1,L,355,N59172E018092,1530,141744.0,R ,972,N59319E018122,1042,142035.C,,,N59481E018181,550,142403.0,L,238,N59538E018202,483,14244 7.0,L,102,N59471E017580,247,142744.0,,,N59438E017568,138,142856.1,,,N59400E017554,17,143031 .1,,,
07.05 07.17
RBT, Reference Business Trajectory Minimised air distance; saving emissions
Continous descent operations; saving emissions and noise 07.37 07.50 08.04:30
ARN 07.28 07.28
Continous climb operations; saving emissions and noise
07.21 07.21
CPH 07.05 07.05 07.17 07.17
08.11
08.17
• Agreement – not a clearance • Airlines agree to fly – ANSPs agree to facilitate • Times are estimates, but can also be targets and/or constraints • Automatic updates outside predefined thresholds • Revised if constraints change or RBT cannot be achieved
44
Baseline 330NM Green Flight Post flight monitoring 100%
2500
90% 2000
70% 60%
1500
50% 40%
1000
30% 20%
Ackumulated fuel used (kg)
% of Max Fuel Flow/Height
80%
Fuel Flow (% of Max) TKOF thrust excluded Height (% of Max) Ackumulated fuel used (kg)
500
10% 0%
0 0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
Distance (NM)
Questions?
45
Final word
Alain Siebert – SESAR JU
Thank you for your attention! Visit us at the SESAR JU booth in hall 9 and meet the SESAR experts!
46
47