6th EMES conference report 2017. Interactive by EMES International Research Network

03- 0

JULY 201

CONFERENCE REPORT

Social enterprise for sustainable societies

Conference report

6th EMES International Research Conference on Social Enterprise | LLN, 3-6 July, 2017

Table of contents 3 Introduction 5

Thematic lines, scientific committee and thematic line conveners

38 Best paper award & Best PhD presentation 39 6th EMES Selected Conference Papers

About organizers and

40 Event promotion

supporters

43 Participantsâ&#x20AC;&#x2122; evaluation

12 Transdisciplinary Forum

46 The team & Next appointment

17 Conference plenary sessions 25 Semi-Plenary sessions 28 Paper and panel parallel sessions 30 Schedule at a glance 32 Poster sessions 35 Book signing event 37 General ICSEM Meeting

Organized by

Supported by

Hosted by

CONFERENCE REPORT

Conference report A word of appreciation from the Co-chairs and the Director We all did it once again: we pulled together an

Once more, early-stage researchers and PhDs

incredible event that gathered an impressive energy

proved their energy and commitment to articulating

around SE. The first thing that we would like to do

themselves to get the most out of their initial

is to thank all the authors whose comittment to

research stages. In the course of four days they

made it possible, research and to being a part of

organized themselves in an autonomous way so as

the EMES community. A total of 345 papers were

to get many things done: they discussed issues they

presented divided into 88 parallel sessions and seven

have at heart, elected their new representative to

panels. In addition, there was a very well-attended

the EMES Board and had fun.

poster session with 21 posters presented. Regarding plenary sessions, four were organized plus two semi-plenaries devoted to specific research projects, ICSEM and TSI.

The scientific discussion continues to improve as the level of the quality of the research under progress also grows. We felt that the field is thriving and steadily walking toward a consolidation phase,

Our host was EMES institutional member CIRTES,

so our main goal was achieved. However, there is

an innovative organization that gathers researchers

always room for improvement and we have taken

interested in non-egalitarian social relations in the

good note of the formal and informal feedback that

world of labour, the effects of these relations on

participants have shared with us in order to improve

society, and public policies or social practices likely to

for the next edition.

counter these effects.

We would like to close by inviting you to our next

Particularly, the Transdisciplinary Forum that took

edition: Sheffield 2019. Mark your calendars as

place the first day attracted over 150 participants,

planning has already began with our newest

most of them local practitioners, supporters and

member, Sheffield Hallam University, which

policy-makers interested in exchanging with SE

will be hosting the 7th EMES International

researchers. These are individuals commited to

Research Conference on Social Enterprise. In

advancing SE practice and policy based on research

the meantime, plenty of events and projects will

and the interaction resulted in fruitful debates and

provide opportunities for fruitful Exchange and

conclusions.

collaboration. Thank you very much for reading!

Marthe Nyssens Co-chair | EMES President

Carlo Borzaga Co-chair | EURICSE president

RocĂo Nogales EMES Managing Director 3

6th EMES International Research Conference on Social Enterprise | LLN, 3-6 July, 2017

380 PARTICIPANTS 345 PAPERS PRESENTED 88 PARALLEL SESSIONS 7 PANEL SESSIONS 21 POSTER PRESENTED

CONFERENCE REPORT

THEMATIC LINES, SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE AND THEMATIC LINE CONVENERS The Conference was structured around the following 10 Thematic lines: 1.

Concepts and models of social enterprise worldwide

Social innovation and social entrepreneurship

Governance, employment and human resource management

Financing issues of social enterprises, philanthropy and social finance

Social impact, value creation and performance

Institutionalization, scaling up and public policies

Informal sector, popular economy, microfinance and development

Social enterprises, sustainable transition and common good

Social and solidarity economy, civil society and social movements

10. Gender and diversity issues The Conference had two co-chairs, Marthe Nyssens (UniversitĂŠ catholique de Louvain, Belgium) and Carlo Borzaga (University of Trento/ EURICSE, Italy). The members of the scientific committee stem from the EMES Network and the IAP-SOCENT project as the two main organisers of the event, although in some instances researchers are associated both to EMES and IAPSOCENT. They are listed below according to their main affiliation. Some of them played a crucial role in the paper selection process acting as thematic line conveners, in which case the line number is indicated next to their name and institutional affiliation.

6th EMES International Research Conference on Social Enterprise | LLN, 3-6 July, 2017

EMES Network: \\ Jo Barraket, Swinburne University of

Technology (Australia) \\ Tom Dedeurwaerdere, Université catholique

de Louvain (Belgium) TL8 \\ Jacques Defourny, HEC-University of Liege

(Belgium) TL1 \\ Janelle A. Kerlin, Georgia State University

(United States) TL1 \\ Andrea Bassi, AICCON & University of Bologna

(Italy) TL5 \\ Avner Ben-Ner, University of Minnesota

(United States) \\ Marie Bouchard, UQAM (Canada) \\ Taco Brandsen, Radboud University Nijmegen

(The Netherlands) TL2 \\ Anna Ciepielewska-Kowalik, Polish Academy of

Sciences (Poland) TL6 \\ Kate Cooney, Yale University (United States) \\ Bernard Enjolras, Institute for Social Research

(Norway) \\ Sílvia Ferreira, University of Coimbra

(Portugal) TL9 \\ Luiz Inacio Gaiger, UNISINOS (Brazil) TL7 \\ Giulia Galera, EURICSE (Italy) TL6 \\ Nicole Göler von Ravensburg, Frankfurt

University of Applied Sciences (Germany) TL5 \\ Georgina Gómez, Erasmus University

Rotterdam (The Netherlands) \\ Isabelle Guérin, Institut de Recherche pour le

Développement (France) TL10 \\ Keith Hart, University of Pretoria (South

Africa) \\ Lars Hulgård, Roskilde University (Denmark)

TL2 \\ Lesley Hustinx, Ghent University (Belgium) \\ Yu-Yuan Kuan, National Chung Cheng

University (Taiwan) TL1 \\ Marc Labie, Université de Mons (Belgium) TL7

\\ Jean-Louis Laville, CNAM/LISE (France) TL9 \\ Matsuyo Makino, Kansai Gaidai University

(Japan) \\ Alex Nicholls, Oxford University (United

Kingdom) \\ Mary O’Shaugnessy, University College Cork

(Ireland) TL4 \\ Geoffrey Pleyers, Université catholique de

Louvain (Belgium) TL9 \\ Francesca Petrella, Aix-Marseille University

(France) TL3 \\ P.K. Shajahan, Tata Institute of Social Sciences

(India) \\ Simon Teasdale, Glasgow Caledonian

University (United Kingdom) TL6 \\ Dennis Young, Cleveland State University

(United States) \\ Annette Zimmer, Münster University

(Germany)

IAP-SOCENT project: \\ Florence Degavre, Université catholique de

Louvain (Belgium) TL10 \\ Donatienne Desmette, Université catholique

de Louvain (Belgium) TL3 \\ Marek Hudon, Université Libre de Bruxelles

(Belgium) TL8 \\ Benjamin Huybrechts, HEC-University of Liege

(Belgium) TL2 \\ Marc Jegers, Vrije Universiteit Brussel

(Belgium) TL4 \\ Andreia Lemaître, Université catholique de

Louvain (Belgium) TL7 \\ Sybille Mertens, HEC-University of Liege

(Belgium) TL5 \\ Roland Pepermans, Vrije Universiteit Brussel

(Belgium) TL3 \\ Anaïs Perilleux, Université catholique de

Louvain (Belgium) TL4 \\ Ariane Szafarz, Université Libre de Bruxelles

(Belgium) TL10

CONFERENCE REPORT

About the organizers and supporters 7

6th EMES International Research Conference on Social Enterprise | LLN, 3-6 July, 2017

The EMES network

CIRTES | UCL

Région Wallonne

EMES is a research network of

The CIRTES is an interdisciplinary

Wallonne is the regional government of

established university research centres

research centre which aims to analyse

Wallonia, the French-speaking part of

and individual researchers whose goal

non-egalitarian social relations in the

Belgium.

has been so far to gradually build up

world of labour, the effects of these

an international corpus of theoretical

relations on society, and public policies

and empirical knowledge, pluralistic in

or social practices likely to counter

disciplines and methodologies, around

these effects.

our “SE” concepts: social enterprise, social entrepreneurship, social economy, solidarity economy and social innovation. EMES has conducted over 15 international comparative research projects and organized international bi-annual conferences and PhD summer schools (the next one will take place in June 2018 in Aix-Marseille). In addition, it collaborates with international organizations and governments at all levels to advance the understanding of social enterprise and support evidencebased policy-making in this field around the world. EMES exists since 1996 and

Scientific research is a driving force for economic development. The production of knowledge is of crucial importance. In close connection with

The Interdisciplinary Research Centre

higher education, scientific research

on Work State and Society (Centre

is the meeting point of scientific

Interdisciplinaire de Recherche Travail,

knowledge’s implementation and

État et Société or CIRTES) was born

the technological achievements of

from the association of three entities:

tomorrow’s society. Fundamental

the Research centre for solidarity and

research is a promising sector, which

social innovation (Centre de recherche

offers opportunities to our young

pour la solidarity et l’innovation sociale

graduates and develops the products

or CERISIS), the School of labour

of the future. This is why the Région

sciences (Ecole des sciences du travail

Wallonne government makes a point of

or TRAV GRH) and the Open faculty

advocating for the funding of research

of economic and social policy (Faculté

projects, their practical implementation

ouverte de politique économique et

and their valorization.

sociale or FOPES).

in 2013 its membership opened to researchers and PhD students from around the world: there are currently over 240 individual members and 13 institutional members from over 50 countries.

The Louvain Foundation

FWO

EMES publishes regularly the results of

The Louvain Foundation is a

Research Foundation - Flanders

its research projects in various formats,

department of UCLouvain. It brings

(FWO) supports fundamental and

including the EMES Working Papers

together alumni and corporate

strategic scientific research, stimulates

series and the EMES Selected Conference

contributions in the form of grants,

international cooperation and

Papers series. In collaboration with the

sponsorship, and in kind or legacy

promotes equal opportunity. The FWO

EMES PhD Students’ Network, EMES

donations, to support the strategic

is a member of the European Research

maintains the EMES Junior Experts’

axes of development of the University.

Council (ERC) and involved in various

Blog (EJEB) as a way to encourage PhD

The funds raised allow to engage

European research initiatives.

students to publish texts about their

and retain well-known academics (via

dissertation in connection with current

teaching chairs) and high potential

issues in society.

Belgian and foreign researchers (via research chairs), awards and international mobility grants for highly motivated students. The specific funding for this conference was the Michel Woitrin funds.

CONFERENCE REPORT

FNRS

The Caisse des Dépôts

Fondation Credit Cooperatif

The mission of the Scientific Research

The Caisse des Dépôts supports the

For some 30 years, the Fondation Crédit

Fund – Wallonie (FNRS) is to develop

networking and development of the

Coopératif has been supporting a social

non-oriented scientific research on

social and solidarity economy. It backs

economy open to the world and to

the basis of initiatives presented by

up public policies and local communities

innovations. The Fondation implements

researchers. The organisation promotes

through the support it provides to the

partnerships with social economy

the production and development

106 Local Support Agencies (“Dispositifs

movements in many fields of activity:

of knowledge through support to

Locaux d’Accompagnement”) and

social cohesion, access to citizenship for

individual researchers as well as

it provides advice to associations. It

handicapped people through sport and

through research programmes carried

also supports the sector’s financial

culture, sustainable development, etc.

out within laboratories and units of the

organization by increasing the equity

universities of the French Community

capital of social and solidarity economy

of Belgium. The action of the FNRS is

organizations and by setting up specific

therefore mainly focused on researcher

bank guarantees. Finally, it manages,

training and research development.

on behalf of the French state, a

Financial support from the FNRS is

100-million-euro fund dedicated to the

based on the sole criteria of scientific

social and solidarity economy within

excellence.

the Programme of Investments for the Future (“Programme d’Investissements d’Avenir”). The Caisse des Dépôts and its affiliates constitute a public group;

The Fondation also actively supports research in the social economy. Through new significant partnerships with university research poles, the actions of the Fondation aim to establish links between the results of works carried out by renowned research laboratories, on the one hand, and practices of social economy actors and leaders, on the other hand.

it is a long-term investor serving the general interest and local economic development.

Fédération Wallonie-Bruxelles

The Institut CDC pour la Recherche

EMES PhD Student Network

The Wallonia-Brussels Federation (Fédération Wallonie-Bruxelles) gathers

The Institut CDC pour la Recherche is a

was created after the 1st EMES PhD

the French-speaking Community of

programme of the Caisse des Dépôts,

Summer School held in Corsica in

Belgium. Education being one of its

within the Strategy Department, which

July 2008. All students who have

core competencies and it exercises it

aims to support research works in the

participated in the EMES PhD Summer

in the French language region and in

strategic fields of activity of the Groupe

School as well as individual Graduate

regard to the institutions that fall under

Caisse des Dépôts. The Institut thus

Members are members of the EMES

its purview in the bilingual Brussels-

supports new works, in connection

PhD Student Network. The EMES PhD

Capital Region.

with the Group’s operational issues,

Student Network has a Facebook

whether they are missions of the Group

group to exchange information and

itself or activities of its affiliates. Its

news and it publishes the EMES Junior

action, which is based on cross-sector

Experts’ Blog (EJEB). PhD students

research, is transversal. It organizes

are represented in the EMES Board

the valorization of results through

of Directors by a PhD representative,

contributions to the public debate.

namely Eduardo Pereira (Lille Catholic

Finally, it feeds strategic reflection on

University, France).

The EMES PhD Student Network

an internal level on the basis of the new trends identified in the field of research.

6th EMES International Research Conference on Social Enterprise | LLN, 3-6 July, 2017

Particularly, the Bernheim Foundation supported the development of the

France De Kinder sheds a light

next generation of scholars. The Bernheim Foundation, based in Belgium,

on their principal motivations to

was created in 1974 by Emile Bernheim, who established L’Innovation

support the EMES conference:

department store in Brussels. He believed that the money earned during one’s professional life should go back to society, as society is where money had originated in the first place. Since the beginning, Bernheim has funded actions that contribute, according to Bernheim’s own will, to “building a society that is human-like, in which the individual keeps its share both in terms of the benefits it can derive from the life of society and the responsibilities it bears, and that he/she must be helped to assume“.

“The Bernheim foundation sees in the EMES network and its 6th Conference a unique opportunity to bring together experts and enable them to share not only best practices but think together about new methods to improve

France De Kinder, director of Bernheim Foundation, explains the mission

human well-being. By giving our

of the organisation and its programme areas:

financial support, we allow young

“The Bernheim Foundation focuses on the Brussels Region and its youth (1225) by supporting financially performing projects that work on stimulating entrepreneurship, acquiring empowering skills, developing citizenship to enable young people from all cultural and social backgrounds to create their own project and be an actor of their lives. Most of the funded programmes have been initiated by social entrepreneurs that have addressed these major issues in many innovative ways. We are convinced that there are new economical approaches to target social and societal aims.”

researchers from all over the world to come together in Belgium, be part of a community and debate on the role social enterprises can play in creating sustainable societies. More concretely, the Foundation is the sponsor of the PhD Best Paper Award, and has also provided funds to subsidize accommodation for

In line with the vision of its humanist and visionary founder, the support

PhD students on the University

of the Foundation to the 6th EMES conference aligns well with the

campus. That enabled us to support

organization’s interests and objectives.

many PhD students with their costs related to the participation at the conference.” In addition, the Foundation has helped with the creation of the video material produced for the conference, including a video devoted to PhDs.

CONFERENCE REPORT

Samuel Bossart from Triodos

Triodos Bank, one of the pioneers in ethical banking, now also committed

confirms that the support

to social finance also supported the conference. As Samuel Bossart,

provided by the Bank is more than

Business Marketing Manager from the Bank explains:

financial:

“Triodos Bank finances companies, institutions and projects that add cultural

“It is about participation in the first

value and benefit people and the environment, with the support of depositors

place: we aim to seize important

and investors who want to encourage socially responsible business and a

social trends, to dialogue with

sustainable society.”

academic stakeholders, and to contribute to put these issues on the agenda. This participation will help us continue to make our role in that visible.” Samuel Bossart underlines the

Thanks to financial assistance provided by Triodos Bank and the work of a core team of Belgian researchers working in the area of “social finance“, two workshops were organized around this important topic. Social finance presents a new form of providing finance where creation of economic value can be integrated into one with sustainable social and environmental development.

important lessons which can

The workshop will include the representatives of Triodos Bank as speakers

be learned from the success of

who will directly contribute to the panel discussions with their experience

Triodos Bank:

on responsible banking.

“Our DNA is matching with the theme of this conference because, as a sustainable actor and frontrunner, we continuously stimulate the debate on issues such as quality of life, corporate social responsibility, social finance and sustainable banking and how economic players integrate this in their activities.”

6th EMES International Research Conference on Social Enterprise | Liege, 4 LLN, 3-6 July July, 1 - 2017 4, 2013

SOCIAL ENTERPRISES FOR SUSTAINABLE SOCIETIES From research to practice, and back

LLN

2017

Transdisciplinary

Forum

This is the third edition of this Forum, which was launched in Liege in 2013 and held again in Helsinki in 2015. This yearâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s The aim of the Forum is to facilitate dialogue and

Transdisciplinary Forum included several sessions addressing

exchange between academic community and

important themes related to the social and solidarity

practitioners although we recognize the increasing

economy and social enterprises. It included an impressive

weight of this event, whish has been growing in

list of speakers and participants coming from non-profit

the three editions until reaching a considerable

organisations, cooperatives, umbrella organisations, public

size and complexity. For instance, for the first time,

and private sectors, and training and education centers.

two versions of the program were produced, one

Organized around twelve well-designed and self-organized

in English and one if French, in order to attract

sessions, the +125 participants shared their reflective

different audiences.

experiences and discussed challenges on multi-sectoral collaboration. There were two main types of sessions, those aimed at local actors and those aimed at the international audience

participating in the Conference although all sessions were open to everyone participating. The first type of sessions featured local social and solidarity economy initiatives so as to bring the SE debate closer to Belgium and its social enterprise community. Representatives of Belgian social enterprises, universities and other stakeholders will present experiences of their work and projects linking research and practice. Out of the 9 sessions held, two were conducted in English and seven in French, although translation into English was be offered in two of them. 12

CONFERENCE REPORT

The summaries below do not include the speakers involved in each of the sessions. Fort he detailed list of chairs and speakers, please go to the Forum program (also available in French).

1. SECOIA: Acknowledging social economy enterprises in the Walloon region FR This workshop was based on the presentation of the main results of the SECOIA project (Social Economy Impact Assessment) together with a discussion with social economy actors about a recognition system for social economy enterprises in the Walloon Region. The SECOIA project, commissioned by the Walloon Region, identified the specific practices of social economy enterprises as well as the recognized

in the empirical fields provided by the NGO’s various development projects in the South. This session discussed the lessons learned by two stakeholders of the Chair (PhD students and NGO staff) in this specific form of partnered research. Discussion revolved around the opportunities but also the methodological and ethical challenges specific to thisform of research as well as ways to improve future partnered research. Organized by CIRTES UCL and Louvain Coopération

of using indicators of these practices to build a

3. Cooperative energy: toward consumer engagement in the energy transition? EN

recognition system for social economy enterprises.

This session addressed the issue of renewable

International experts who have had similar

energy cooperatives having been perceived as ideal

experiences in their countries were invited to enrich

institutional models to foster consumer engagement

the debate.

in sustainable energy generation and consumption.

effects of these practices. Researchers have studied (through three consultation phases) the possibility

Organized by Centre d’Économie Sociale, HECUniversity of Liege; Spiral, Département de Sciences Politiques; Ciriec; SAW-B; and MOSAL Law Firm.

2. Chair in Social and Solidarity Economy in the South: A dialogue between researchers and field actors FR Since 2012, the UCLouvain Chair in Social and Solidarity Economy in the South (CESSS), a unique

The session gathered the European Federation of Renewable Energy Sources Cooperatives (REScoop. eu) and researchers working in the field of renewable energy cooperatives and community energy who discussed how energy cooperatives can promote households’ engagement in renewable energy production, energy efficiency and demand-side response, and discuss the possibilities of establishing further synergy between research and practice.

partnership between the university’s NGO Louvain

Organized by: EPFL, Lausanne; Centre d’Économie

Coopération and CIRTES, facilitates academic

Sociale, HEC, ULg; Leuphana University of Lüneburg;

research in social and solidarity economy grounded

REScoop.eu)

6th EMES International Research Conference on Social Enterprise | LLN, 3-6 July, 2017

4. WISDOM (Wallonia Social Innovation Domicile): The elderly’s domicile: A space for social innovation? FR At-home ageing is a crucial issue in the longterm care debate and its related reforms all across Europe. This first WISDOM project1 roundtable presented a set of social innovations supported by not-for-profit providers in the domiciliary eldercare in Wallonia. Researchers and field actors discussed the kind of social approaches to health these initiatives refer to and, more fundamentally, what makes them social and innovative and to whom. Organized by CIRTES UCL

5. When is social finance social? FR (English translation provided)

6. How to mobilize actors and researchers to foster social economy? The case of digitalization in the services sector FR If collaboration between the world of research and the actors of the social enterprises world is often desired by both sides, the setting up of such collaboration is often complex: both the temporality and the objectives of researchers differ from those in the field. Hence, it requires developing a mutual and realistic understanding of the expectations and contributions of each other’s. This workshop approached this issue through the development of a concrete case: the impact of new technologies on work and society structuration. Indeed, the use of digital technologies in the field of services

Social finance has drawn a lot of attention in the

highlight different questions: form and framework

aftermath of the financial sector turbulence in

of employment; relations between enterprises/

2007-2008. An array of initiatives—e.g. social banks,

providers, users and workers; accessibility to services

crowdfunding, financial cooperatives, socially

... All these issues affect social protection systems,

responsable investment funds, etc.—have thrived.

the world of work, and the equity and equality in

Our workshop aimed to identify the structuring

the access of certain services. Social enterprises

features of the field of social finance and to

will face these issues and a partnership with the

discuss its boundaries; it discussed questions like:

world of research could enable them to anticipate

Can social finance be defined through the public

this phenomenon and position themselves as best

it targets at? Through its practices? Through its

as possible in this digital economy and to foster a

governance structure? Through its social mission?

positive development for all.

The theorization of social finance appearing to be at its early stages, this workshop aimed to bring a

Organized by Concertes and CIRTES

contribution towards this end. Organized by CIRTES UCL, Université de Rennes 1 and CERMi ULB

1.- Wallonia Social Innovation Domicile (WISDOM) is an interdisciplinary, interuniversity and partnership research coordinated by CIRTES (UCL) and interested on how social enterprises innovate in the field of elderly home care. WISDOM benefits from funding from the Walloon Region. The survey, which was conducted during more than two years, studied in depth 14 cases of social innovation in Wallonia and Brussels. The analysis articulates socio-economic approaches to those of public health.

CONFERENCE REPORT

7. The future of renewable energy cooperatives in the European energy governance EN

9. Labels in social finance: opportunity or threat? FR

In this second session dedicated to cooperative

actors in the field of social finance, labels may help

energy, researchers and practitioners working in

consumers to make sure that financial institutions

this field discussed what roles renewable energy

comply with ethical, social and environmental

cooperatives can play in the current and future

charters. However, the proliferation of labels entails

energy policy governance regime, in Europe and

the risk of a confusion. This session gathered social

elsewhere. Questions addressed include: to which

finance actors to tackle issues around teh following

extent is European policy supportive of

questions: What should be the foundations of

energy cooperatives and communities? What are the main divergences between European nations in this respect? How is the 4th package of proposals for the reform of EU energy legislation going to change the current situation? How to build stronger partnerships between energy cooperatives and governmental authorities at the European, national and local levels?

In view of the development of financial products and

these labels? What should they be governed and controlled? Are they effective in the sense that they deliver enhanced information for consumers? What risks do they entail (negative reputational chain effects)? The ultimate goal was to outline new perspectives on the development of labels. Organized by CIRTES UCL, CERMi ULB

Organized by EPFL, Lausanne; Centre d’Économie Sociale, HEC, ULg ; Leuphana University of Lüneburg; REScoop.eu

8. WISDOM: Innovating care services: the challenges of socioeconomic viability and well-being at work FR (English translation provided) The second round table of the WISDOM project entitled “What organizational models for social innovation…?” discussed how the new forms of support for a healthy ageing in place address sustainability issues in relation to financing, diffusion and well being at work. Organized by CIRTES

6th EMES International Research Conference on Social Enterprise | LLN, 3-6 July, 2017

Other three sessions held during the Forum include: 10. Exchanges on researching and practising social enterprise: A dialogue about possible common horizons This session constituted the first time gathering of the main EU-level representatives of social enterprise umbrella organizations to discuss the value of research within their organizations and exchange their ideas on how the impact of research can be enhanced. The format of the session followed a fish bowl presentation of all the organizations, followed by a plenary discussion with participation of the audience.

11. Forum on Education and Training on Social Enterprise (FETSE) Since July 2011 EMES has spearheaded this interesting initiative intended to foster the development of high-quality and accessible (inter-) university educational programmes in the field of social enterprise / social entrepreneurship. Two

and Lars Hulgård, as well as representatives from external experts, policy makers, students, and practitioners participated in the session and reviewed the progress of this initiative over the five years of its existence and shared their ideas on how to move forward.

12. EMES PhD network meeting It is not surprising that the PhD students and researchers are close to EMES’ heart. We are convinced that besides interacting with their peers from other universities, they will benefit by being exposed to a broader group of stakeholders. Therefore this space at the Forum was specifically organized, designed and led by PhDs. It offered the perfect arena for PhD students on social and solidarity economy and social enterprises to share and learn from each other about their experiences in conducting research, and explore together how their research can be useful for “practice”.

members of FETSE Advisory Board, Sílvia Ferreira

In all, the evaluation of the Forum by participants was high with 78% of the respondents evaluating it between 7 and 10 in a scale of 1 (poor) to 10 (excellent).

Conference plenary sessions

6th EMES International Research Conference on Social Enterprise | LLN, 3-6 July, 2017

The conference had the right combination of reduced parallel sessions and panels and plenary sessions. Instead of having a unique keynote speaker, the organizers preferred to follow a panel or round table discussion for this plenary sessions. There were three full plenary sessions and two parallel sessions particularly focused on two ongoing EMES projects, ICSEM and TSI.

Plenary session 1

Which Social Enterprises models for sustainable societies? Dialogue between research and practice Issues such as growing social inequalities, massive unemployment, lack of economic democracy and environmental unsustainability have increased the global expectations from social enterprises. Each in its own way, governments, civil society actors, non-profit leaders and the business sector are seeking to discover, or rediscover, new possibilities for promoting economic approaches while targeting social aims. Particularly, the speakers discussed four models of social enterprises (social cooperative, entrepreneurial non

 Which are the three most pressing challenges faced by your social enterprise when contributing to that transition?  How can research support your social enterprise in addressing those challenges? The ICSEM working paper “Fundamentals for an International Typology of Social Enterprise Models” summarizes the social enterprise models commented in this , we recommend that you read (Defourny, J. and Nyssens, M., 2016, ICSEM Working Papers, No. 33, Liege: The International Comparative Social Enterprise Models (ICSEM) Project). The paper is available here.

profit, public sector social enterprise and social business) stemming from the ICSEM project. Each of these four models is characterized by a specific institutional trajectory and presents unique characteristics. In addition, every type of social enterprise will be illustrated by an example (video) from several countries around of the world including Belgium, Bolivia, Italy, Korea and The Netherlands. In each of them, the manager of the social enterprise that illustrates the model answered the following questions:  What does your social enterprise do and what are its objectives?  How does your social enterprise contribute to the transition toward a sustainable society?

Chair: Marthe Nyssens is full professor at the School of Economics of the Catholic University of Louvain, Belgium and member of ‘Centre de Recherches Interdisciplinaires Travail, Etat, Société (CIRTES). She has been president of EMES since December 2015. She holds a Master in economics (University of California at San Diego),) and a Ph.D. in economics (University of Louvain). Her research work has

CONFERENCE REPORT

focused on conceptual approaches

including: Social Procurement and

research interests also include

to the third sector (associations,

New Public Governance (Routledge,

public policy issues in microfinance,

cooperatives, social enterprises…),

2016) and Strategic Issues for the

social entrepreneurship and

both in developed and developing

Not for Profit Sector (UNSW Press,

complementary currencies.

countries, as well as on the links

2008). In addition to her role as

between third sector organizations

Director of Centre for Social Impact

and public policies. Her research

Swinburne at Swinburne University

deals with socioeconomic logics

of Technology, she is National

of “not-for-profit organizations”.

Research Director of the CSI

She analyses the articulations of

network, which is a collaboration

these organizations with public

between three Australian

policies, the market and the civil

universities. She is also chairperson

society. She investigates the role

of the International Social

of these kinds of organizations

Innovation Research Conference

in comparison with business and

2017 organizing committee.

Akira Yonezawa is an associate

public bodies in several fields

professor in the department of

such as work integration, care or

sociology at Meiji Gakuin University

the commons. Her recent work

in Japan. He received a Ph.D. in

focuses on the emergence of

sociology from the University

different social enterprise models

of Tokyo. He has published two

in an international comparative

monographs in Japanese on social

perspective. Her presentation is

enterprises related to the social

available to download here.

policies. The first book is Work Integration Social Enterprise in

Three researchers from three different continents developed some challenges faced by research in their understanding of how social enterprises can participate to a more sustainable society.

Contemporary Japan (2011), in Marek Hudon holds a Ph.D. in

which he argues the fruitfulness of

Economics and Management

the tripolar model to analyze WISEs

Sciences and a Master in

through case studies. The second

Philosophy. He is currently

book is titled as A New Perspective

Professor at the Solvay Brussels

on Social Enterprises (2017) whose

School of Economics and

theme is institutionalization of

Management (ULB). He has

Japanese WISEs after 2000 and a

initiated the European Microfinance

variety of institutional logics around

Programme (EMP), a one-year

WISEs. He has also published articles

Master’s Degree in microfinance

on issues of social enterprises,

co-organised by four European

third sector and social policies in

universities, and is still scientific

Japanese journals. His article for

coordinator of this Master. He is

English readers is titled as “Potential

also co-director of the Centre for

and Challenges of Mutually-

European Research in Microfinance

Oriented Social Enterprise where

Jo Barraket is a leading researcher

(CERMi) and the Centre d’Etudes

People with and without Disabilities

of social enterprise and the social

Economiques et Sociales de

Work on an Equal Basis” (Japan

economy in Australia. She is a

l’Environnement (CEESE). He has

Labor Review, 2015) in which he

political sociologist, with particular

conducted research in India, Kenya,

examined the working conditions

interests in relationships between

Mali, Morocco, Vietnam and the

of workers in the WISE emphasizing

state and civil society in public

Democratic Republic of Congo. In

the democratic governance. Now

policy development. Her research

2006, Prof. Hudon was a visiting

he is working on a study relating

on social enterprise considers their

fellow at Harvard University where

people’s cognition and social

social impacts and their roles as

he worked on ethical issues in

categories of NP/FP organizations. A

policy actors. She is the author

microfinance under the supervision

summary of the major points of his

of more than 60 publications,

of Professor Amartya Sen. Current

presentation is available to here. 19

6th EMES International Research Conference on Social Enterprise | LLN, 3-6 July, 2017

The five videos produced featured the following social enterprises and are available on the EMES YouTube channel:

Les Petits Riens, Belgium. Reciclying social enterprise for homeless work and social integration.

El Ceibo, Bolivia. Transforming workers’ families through the production of fairtrade cocoa in Bolivia.

Fairphone, The Netherlands. Transforming a entire industry by making ethical and sustainable smartphones.

Association of Appropriate Technology Coops (AATC), South Korea. Supporting communities’ resilience by supporting the energy transition.

È nostra, Italy. A RES-coop rooted in its community for a fair and sustainable energy transition.

Plenary session 2

innovation for community economies: how action

Decentering the enterprise, recentering the social

research creates ‘other worlds’” on which the speech was partly based, is available here.

Katherine Gibson from the Institute for Culture and Society, (Western Sidney University, Australia) offered a keynote address that was followed by the comments and feedback of Fernanda Wanderley (Instituto de Investigaciones socio económicas, Universidad Católica Boliviana, La Paz, Bolivia). They revolved around the topic of greater economic diversity as an important contributor to building economic resilience. Diverse economies theory draws on anti-essentialist marxian and feminist

economics as well as economic anthropology,

Chairs: Florence Degavre is a socio-economist. She’s

informal sector and development studies. Within a

interested in understanding the socio-economic

diverse economy framing, the radical heterogeneity

logics of care provision in European societies. On

of economic practices is brought to the fore and

the basis of an abundant empirical fieldwork carried

the task of building ethical economies becomes

out in elderly home care services, she has examined

an empirical, experimental and political possibility.

care from three main angles: 1 / social innovation

From this perspective, the social economy reshapes

in social enterprises (SE) providing elderly care,

the economic terrain by highlighting the viability

in particular the role of resource-hybridisation as

of diverse enterprise forms and reinvigorates the

a major factor of innovation 2/ the potential for

cooperative model of business, displacing the

women’s empowerment of SE in the care sector and

normalized capitalist firm from the centre stage of

3 / the transformation of European care regimes

economic thinking. Katherine Gibson’s paper “Social

through the logics of quasi-commodification and

CONFERENCE REPORT

re-familialisation since the 1990s,

economy in the South, mainly in

in 2009 Professor Gibson held

with a particular attention on

Latin America, and on substantive

positions as Professor and Head

migrant care workers. One of the

approaches to the economy

of the Department of Human

theoretical contribution aimed

according to Polanyi’s intellectual

Geography in the Research School

at by her work is to contribute

legacy. She teaches, notably,

of Pacific and Asian Studies at

to the frame of analysis of the

“Development Theories”, “History

the Australian National University

gendered logics underpinning

and Streams of the Economic

(1999-2008) and Director of

social enterprises and to add to the

Thought” and project management

Women’s Studies at Monash

understanding of SE’s interactions

and analysis.

University (1992-1995). She has

with public policies and the market

directed action research projects

in the elderly care field. The strong

with communities interested in

empirical anchorage of Florence’s

alternative economic development

research is made possible through

pathways in Australia, Papua New

an important commitment with

Guinea, the Solomon Islands and

meaningful partnership research.

the Philippines. The Community

FD is member of EMES since 2006

Economies Collective Opens in

and of several research groups or

a new window, which Gibson-

networks on gender at the national

Graham established, is an ongoing

or international level.

Speakers: Katherine Gibson is internationally known for her research on rethinking economies as sites of ethical action. She trained as a human geographer with expertise in political economy and, with her collaborator for over

collaboration between academic and community researchers and activists in Australia, North America, Europe and South East Asia. The goal of the Collective is to theorise, discuss, represent and ultimately enact new visions of economy.

30 years, the late Professor Julie Graham, developed a distinctive approach to economic geography Andreia Lemaître is a socioeconomist, associate professor at the Université catholique de Louvain (Belgium). She is a member of the Centre for Development Studies (DVLP) and

drawing on feminism, poststructuralism and action research. The diverse economies research program they initiated has become a vibrant sub-field of study within the social sciences. In the late 1990s the collective authorial voice

Fernanda Wanderley holds a

of J.K. Gibson-Graham led the

doctorate in sociology from

critique of capitalocentric thinking

Columbia University, New York

that was blocking the emergence

City and is the director of the

Her research and publications focus

of economic possibility. Prior to

Instituto de Investigaciones Socio-

on popular and solidarity-based

joining Western Sydney University

Económicas de la Universidad

of the Interdisciplinary Research Centre on Work, State and Society (CIRTES).

6th EMES International Research Conference on Social Enterprise | LLN, 3-6 July, 2017

Católica Boliviana, She has been carrying extensive research on Bolivian economy and society. She has written many books and articles, including La economía social y solidaria: desafíos teóricos y políticos, Lecturas desde América Latina. La Paz, CIDES-UMSA y HEGOA, Plural Editores 2015; Hacia una política municipal de cuidado – integrando los derechos de las mujeres y la infancia (Toward a municipal policy of care: Integrating women’s and children’s rights), La Paz, CIDES-UMSA, 2012 (Co-author with Cecilia Salazar, Fernanda Sostres and Ivonne Farah); El cuidado como derecho social: situación y desafíos del bienestar social en Bolivia (Care as a social right: The welfare situation and challenges in Bolivia), Lima, OIT, 2011; “Between Reform and Inertia: Bolivia’s Employment and Social Protection Policies over the Past 20 Years” in International Labor Review, vol. 148, 3, 2009 and Trabajo no mercantil e inserción laboral – una mirada de género desde los hogares (No paid work

Chair: Anaïs Perillleux holds the Petits Riens, set up around the issue of social impact of enterprises, at UCLouvain. She holds a Ph.D. in Economics and Management Sciences as a FNRS Research Fellow at the Warocqué School of Business and Economics (UMONS) in the Centre for European Research in Microfinance (CERMi). Her Ph.D. focuses on two main issues for cooperatives in microfinance: their governance and their growing process. From November 2011 to January 2013, she was a postdoctoral visiting fellow at Yale University in the

and employment – a gender perspective from

Economic Growth Center. She pursued her work

households) La Paz, Plural Editores, 2003. For more

on cooperatives in microfinance using a database

information, visit her blog.

from a network of local co-ops located in Senegal.

Plenary session 3

Social enterprises as hybrid organizations: A research program This session explored what the concept of hybrid

In March 2013, Anaïs Périlleux has obtained an AXA Postdoctoral Fellowship. Her project was to investigate the role of cooperatives banks on three major risks in the banking sector: the systemic risks, the risks of credit contraction and the intergenerational risks.

organizations brings to the field of social enterprises if considered as institutional arrangements combining social and entrepreneurial logics. AnneClaire Pache discussed the various responses given to competing social and commercial logics at the organizational and individual level observed in her career as researcher. She discussed the outcomes of hybrid organizing and analyze under what conditions can those organizations achieve high levels of social performance. HEr presentation brought to light how this concept is especially relevant to identify and study tensions inherent to those organizations. In particular, it helps to better understand how hybrid organizations can survive and flourish while embedded in pluralistic institutional environments. As a second step, Marie Bouchard from the University of Quebec at Montréal discussed the previous presentation complementing Pache’s approach with the experience of the social economy. Bouchard reviewed critically the relevance of hybridity as a concept, highlighting possible combinations with other analytical grids such as social innovation. 22

Speakers: Anne-Claire Pache is Dean of Academic Programs at ESSEC and a Professor within the ESSEC Public and Private Policy Department. She holds the ESSEC Philanthropy Chair. She co-founded the ESSEC chair in Social Entrepreneurship in 2002 together with Professor Thierry Sibieude. She graduated from ESSEC Business School in 1994, holds a Master in Public Administration (2001) from Harvard University John F. Kennedy School of Government and a Ph.D. in Organisational Behavior from INSEAD (2010). Her research focuses on social enterprises, on their growth process and their relations with their institutional

CONFERENCE REPORT

environment. She authored several books and articles, including in the Academy of Management Review, the Academy of Management Journal and Leadership Quarterly. Before embarking on an academic career, Dr. Pache was part of the co-founding team of Unis-Cité, a French nonprofit organisation which advocated the idea of voluntary civil service in France.

the various actors present in the social enterprise eco-system; they address areas such as market development, capacity building, access to finance and research and development. Given the essential role of policy-making in boosting the potential of social enterprises the 6th EMES Conference closes four days of inquiry and exchange with a call for action for public administrations at all levels. While twenty years ago the request from the emerging social enterprise community was to have specific policies developed for them, nowadays an additional request has come to the front: “how” and “with whom” these policies are being built. How can policy-making better address the challenges facing social enterprises in collaboration with stakeholders ensuring processes that are inclusive toward invisibilized actors and rooted in the genuine needs

Marie J. Bouchard is a professor at the Université du Québec à Montréal and a member of the Center for

of these organizations? How can a fluid multi-level governance that crosses policy areas be ensured

Research on Social Innovations (CRISES), where she

for policy measures and tools in order to help social

runs the Team on Collectives Entreprises. She was the

enterprises become sustainable?

university director of the Community Habitat group of the CURA in Social Economy, and the Canada Research Chair in Social Economy. She published a statistical portrait of Montréal’s social economy (2008). She developed a conceptual framework for determining the statistical population of the social economy for the Quebec Institute of Statistics (2011), and a conceptual framework for the production of statistics on cooperative for the International Labor Office (2017). She was scientific editor of The Worth of the Social Economy and The Weight of the Social Economy, an International Perspective, (Peter Lang 2009 and 2015).

Chair: Lars Hulgård is full Professor of Social

In 2011, she also edited, L’économie sociale au Québec,

Entrepreneurship at Roskilde University (RUC,

vecteur d’innovation with the University of Quebec

Denmark) and Visiting Professor at the Tata Institute

Press, also published by the University of Toronto

(India). He was the president of EMES from 2010

Press in 2013 under the title Innovations and the Social

to 2015. In 2006, he founded the Centre for Social

Economy. The Quebec Experience. Since 2015, she has

Entrepreneurship at RUC and he chairs the Social

chaired the CIRIEC International Committee on Social

Innovation and Organizational Learning research group

and Cooperative Economics.

at that university. Lars was appointed in 2013 member

Plenary session 4

of a committee created by the Minister of Business

Social enterprises for sustainable societies: Policy perspectives

and Growth of the Danish government that will work

In the last years a number of innovative policy

In 2004-05 he was the first international coordinator

initiatives have been developed place in Europe and

of CINEFOGO-Network of Excellence, an international

around the world to support the development of

cross-disciplinary network funded by the EU, Sixth

social enterprises. These policies range from large

Framework Programme. He has been a visiting scholar

European strategies like the Social Business Initiative

at Harvard University (2004), University of California

to plans and programs focused on a given territory

(1998) and University of Mannheim (1992).

on a new legal framework and other institutional support structures for social enterprise in Denmark.

and its actors. These policies aim to strengthen

civil society interests. In this capacity

2017. Previously, she worked at the

she represents the Swedish civil

Commission’s Joint Research Centre

society umbrella, Forum – idéburna

for 24 years, starting in Ispra (Italy) in

organisationer med social inriktning,

1993 during the first years of fusion

gathering civil society umbrellas in the

research, and moving on to manage

social sector, social economy and non-

various units in Ispra and Brussels. Dr.

profit welfare stakeholders. She is also

Engelmann holds a PhD in analytical

Senior Policy Adviser at the Secretariat

and radiochemistry completed at the

of the Archbishop and General Secretary

National Research Centre in Karlsruhe.

for the Church of Sweden. Ariane’s Speakers: Bruno Roelants has been Secretary General of CICOPA since 2002 and of the regional organization CECOP CICOPA-Europe since 2006. He has worked on development projects in China, India, and Eastern Europe, and coordinated the 2002 cooperative movement negotiating group on the ILO Recommendation on the Promotion of Cooperatives (no. 193). He holds a master’s degree in labour studies, has taught courses on cooperatives in Italy, and is the co-author of Cooperatives, Territories and Jobs (2011), as well as Capital and the Debt Trap – Learning from Cooperatives in the Global Crisis (2013). He also coordinated the report Cooperative Growth for the 21st Century (2013).

key area of expertise in the EESC and at European level is social economy enterprises, social innovation and social investment. She has drafted several key opinions on the subject, most recently on the financial eco-system for social economy enterprises on request by the Luxembourg EU Presidency and is currently drafting an EESC opinion for the Netherlands EU Presidency on innovation and business models. She is Vice President of the EESC internal market section, the EESC representative in the European Commission high level expert group GECES and a member of the EESC Permanent Study Group for Social Economy Enterprise and the EESC Social Economy Category Group. Ariane holds a Master of Science degree in Business and Economics from the University of Stockholm.

Jean-Louis Laville is a professor in Paris, at the National Conservatory of Arts and Crafts (cnam), where he holds a Chair in Solidarity Economy, he is researcher at Lise (Interdisciplinary laboratory for economic sociology, CNRS-cnam) and IFRIS (Society Innovation Research Institute of Paris). Involved in many international research networks, he is the European coordinator for Karl Polanyi Institute of Political Economy, founding member of EMES and of the Latin-American network RILESS (Network of Latin-American Researchers in Social and Solidarity Economy). He is related to foreign research laboratories such as CRIDIS (Interdisciplinary Research Center, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium) and CRISES (Interdisciplinary Research Center in Humanities and Social Sciences, Montreal, Canada).

Ariane Rodert is Vice-President for Group III of the European Economic and Social Committee (EESC) and appointed as a EESC member by the Swedish government representing

Ulla Engelmann is Head of Unit for Clusters, Social Economy and Entrepreneurship within DG GROW at the European Commission since March

CONFERENCE REPORT

Semi-Plenary sessions

In addition to the plenary sessions, two semi-plenary sessions focusing on ongoing or recently completed research projects were organized.

The International Comparative Social Enterprise Models (ICSEM) Project Many observers are still looking for a definition of social enterprise that would be broadly accepted. Policy makers would like to have clear criteria to identify the social enterprises that they want to support. Even scholars Full name:

and researchers sometimes suffer from the apparent confusion generated

International Comparative Social

by endless conceptual debates. The ICSEM Project, launched in 2013

Enterprise Models Project (ICSEM)

and now in its final phase, has developed a research strategy that goes much deeper than the conceptual debate and thereby lays theoretical

Scientific Coordinators:

and empirical foundations for a new analytical framework, highlighting a

Jacques Defourny (ULg-

diversity of social enterprise models.

Belgium) and Marthe Nyssens (UCL-Belgium), EMES Belgian institutional members

Involving some 250 researchers from 50 countries across all world regions, the ICSEM Project relied first on country-specific analyses of SE landscapes. In a second stage, it included a survey, based on a detailed questionnaire,

Participating EMES members:

common to all research partners and involved countries, and which

250 researchers from 55 countries

resulted in an international dataset covering 730 social enterprises. Two

(+50 are EMES members)

major ICSEM outputs were presented in this session: the very first results achieved through cluster analysis applied to a list of major variables in the

Date:

dataset, on the one hand, and comparative analysis of some transversal

July 2013 - April 2017

issues which are key to understanding the diversity and the potential of social enterprises in various contexts, on the other hand. The four

emes.net/research-projects/socialenterprise/icsem-project/

presentations included in this semi-plenary were: 1.

Jacques Defourny: Testing the relevance of major SE models: first results from the worldwide ICSEM database on social enterprises (with M. Nyssens, O. Brolis)

Davorka Vidoviฤ and Julianna Kiss: The influence of historical and institutional legacies of post-socialist regimes on the present-day social enterprises in Central and Eastern Europe (with A. Ciepielewska-Kowalik, L. Hubai, K. Legnerovรก, M. Dohnalovรก)

Danijel Baturina: Role of external funding in development of social entrepreneurship in CEE and SEE countries (with A. Agolli, E. Haska, J. Kiss, M. Mihรกly, M. Bashevska, J. Korunovska Srbijanko, M. Lisetchi, N. Bibu, D. Rakin, V. Radojicic)

Simone Poledrini: The interplay of contextual factors and characteristics of cooperative social enterprises in Europe, North America and Australia (with N. Gรถler von Ravensburg, R. Lang, M. Starnawska)

CONFERENCE REPORT

The Third Sector in Europe—Concept, Measurement and Environmental Changes The Third Sector in Europe lacks a clear identity insofar as there is no clear-shared understanding across Europe and in the EU of what exactly the third sector is and what its role is in the European public space. A main reason for this lack of common identity is that the manifold of self-

Full name:

organized citizen-based initiatives constitutive of the third sector are not

Third Sector Impact (TSI)

sufficiently aware of being part of a common sector. The EU FP7 funded Third Sector Impact Project – mobilized the collaborative efforts of 12 European research institutions in order to advance the measurement of the third sector in Europe. In addition to clarifying the concept of the third sector, gauging the scope and scale of this sector, and assessing the sector’s broader social and political impact, this project sought to determine whether there are barriers that might be impeding the impact that the sector could have and to suggest ways to reduce any barriers that might exist. The following panel speakers presented some of the main results of the

Scientific coordination: Bernard Enjolras (ISF, Norway) Participating EMES members: two institutional (coordinator plus LEST, France) and two individuals (Taco Brandsen, Danijel Baturina) Date: February 2014 - February 2017

project: \\ Bernard Enjolras: The third sector in Europe: concept and

measurement

emes.net/research-projects/thirdsector/tsi-project/

\\ Taco Brandsen: Third sector organizations confronting

environmental changes: The Netherlands \\ Rafael Chaves: Third sector organizations confronting

environmental changes: Spain

6th EMES International Research Conference on Social Enterprise | LLN, 3-6 July, 2017

PAPER AND PANEL PARALLEL SESSIONS As indicated above, a total of 345 papers were presented at Louvain-la-Neuve divided into 88 parallel sessions and seven panels. Capturing such knowledge and energy would be impossible using only words so we have made a selection of these parallel sessions. Therefore, we encourage you to consult the program in the three formats available: \\ Single timetable format \\ Full timetable format \\ Online version (available until July 2019)

We also include the â&#x20AC;&#x153;Schedule at a glanceâ&#x20AC;? to provide a sense of the sessions what were held and you have a chance to see a selection of papers in the section EMES Selected Conference Papers below.

CONFERENCE REPORT

6th EMES International Research Conference on Social Enterprise | LLN, 3-6 July, 2017

Tuesday, July 4

Schedule at a glance

09:00 - 10:30

A01

Assesment of ecosystems social enterprises across countries

09:00 - 10:30

A02

Social enterprise models in Africa

09:00 - 10:30

A03

Factors of emergence of social innovation

09:00 - 10:30

A05

Social innovation in social policy field

09:00 - 10:30

A06

Social enterprise-corporate collaborations

09:00 - 10:30

A07

Social impact of WISEs

09:00 - 10:30

A08

Determinants of social entreprises' performance

09:00 - 10:30

A09

Social movements

09:00 - 10:30

A10

Community energy organisations

09:00 - 10:30

A11

Mission drift and isomorphism I

09:00 - 10:30

Panel 1.1

Welfare regime and social enterprise in East Asia I: Changing Welfare Regime and New Roles of Social Enterprise in East Asia

09:00 - 10:30

Panel 2.1

SERESI 1: Solidarity Economy, Reciprocity and Social Innovation (SERESI)

11:00 - 13:00

B01

Social enterprises and social and solidarity economy across Europe

11:00 - 13:00

B02

Social mission versus economic performanceâ&#x20AC;Ś and beyond

11:00 - 13:00

B03

Social innovation as a contested concept

11:00 - 13:00

B04

New learning environments on social enterprises

11:00 - 13:00

B05

Mission drift and social enterprise

11:00 - 13:00

B06

Social enterprises and ethical issues

11:00 - 13:00

B07

Work, employment and cooperative

11:00 - 13:00

B08

Financing issues of social enterprises

11:00 - 13:00

B09

Assessing social impact: Concrete cases

11:00 - 13:00

B10

Sustainable transition

11:00 - 13:00

B11

Community and ethical banks and microfinance

11:00 - 13:00

Panel 3.1

Social enterprises in Latin America I

11:00 - 13:00

Panel 4

Case studies of social investment and Social Innovation policies (INNOSI)

14:30 - 15:30

POSTER

Poster Session

17:30 - 19:00

C01

Social enterprises across Nordic countries

17:30 - 19:00

C02

WISES in their eco-system

17:30 - 19:00

C03

Defining and analysing social innovations: building a framework

17:30 - 19:00

C04

Embeddedness of social innovations in a multi-layer eco-system 1

17:30 - 19:00

C05

Human Resources Practices and Social Enterprises

17:30 - 19:00

C06

Social enterprises, public services and social services

17:30 - 19:00

C07

Local and complementary currencies and their institutionalisation

17:30 - 19:00

C08

Microfinance, solidarity finance and public policies

17:30 - 19:00

C09

Communities establishing sustainable development

17:30 - 19:00

C10

Social enterprise and local public policies

17:30 - 19:00

C11

Solidarity economy and local development

17:30 - 19:00

Panel 1.2

SERESI 2: Evolving New Roles in the Areas of Employment, Health Care, and Environment (SERESII)

17:30 - 19:00

Panel 2.2

SERESI 2: Solidarity economy and changes in public policy (SERESII)

CONFERENCE REPORT

D01

Social enterprise models in South Asia

09:00 - 10:30

D02

Social enterprises in Latin America

09:00 - 10:30

D03

Social Enterprises over the Channel

09:00 - 10:30

D04

Workplace, cooperation and empowerment

09:00 - 10:30

D05

Governance and social enterprises

09:00 - 10:30

D06

Theories of social finance

09:00 - 10:30

D07

Cooperatives

09:00 - 10:30

D09

Anti-oppression practices and power relationship

09:00 - 10:30

D10

Social enterprise, national public policies and austerity

09:00 - 10:30

D11

Values and culture

09:00 - 10:30

D12

The empowering role of social enterprise

09:00 - 10:30

Panel 6

Les salariés du secteur associatif : des conditions de travail et des relations de service spécifiques ?

16:30 - 18:00

E01

Cooperatives and mutuals in Europe

16:30 - 18:00

E02

Social Enterprises in Eastern and Southeastern Europe

16:30 - 18:00

E03

Social innovation in the local welfare systems

16:30 - 18:00

E04

Embeddedness of social innovations in a multi-layer eco-system 2

16:30 - 18:00

E05

Collaborative economy

16:30 - 18:00

E06

Social enterprise and participation

16:30 - 18:00

E07

Philanthropy and external funding support of social enterprises

16:30 - 18:00

E08

Microfinance and NGOs

16:30 - 18:00

E09

Social enterprise and action research

16:30 - 18:00

E10

Food alternative production

16:30 - 18:00

E11

Informal economy and popular economy

16:30 - 18:00

E12

Scaling-up of social enterprises

16:30 - 18:00

Panel 3.2

Social enterprises in Latin America II

16:30 - 18:00

Panel 5

Employees with psychiatric disabilities working in social enterprises: Job tenure, work productivity and stigma

09:00 - 11:00

F01

Asian social enterprise models

09:00 - 11:00

F02

Social enterprises and post-socialist states

09:00 - 11:00

F03

Social value: creation and diffusion issues

09:00 - 11:00

F04

Motivations to enter social entrepreneurship 1

09:00 - 11:00

F05

Motivations to enter social entrepreneurship 2

09:00 - 11:00

F06

Profiles and trajectories of social enterprise leaders

09:00 - 11:00

F07

Social finance

09:00 - 11:00

F08

Measuring social performance: A discussion of the different approaches

09:00 - 11:00

F09

Environmentaly sustainable social enterprises

09:00 - 11:00

F10

Mission and institutional construction of social enterprise

09:00 - 11:00

F11

Social economy under the gender lens

09:00 - 11:00

Panel 2.3

SERESI 3: Solidarity economy and changes in public policy

09:00 - 11:00

Panel 7

Social Enterprise and Commoning: Exploring Community Economies Perspectives on Sustainable Transition

Thursday, July 6

09:00 - 10:30

Wednesday, July 5

Louvain-la-Neuve. 4-6 July 2017

6th EMES International Research Conference on Social Enterprise | LLN, 3-6 July, 2017

POSTER SESSIONS A total of 21 posters were presented during the conference, they are listed below but you can find the authors and the abstract in the Conference program. Some authors updated the final poster presented during the Conference: in those cases, you can download them directly by clicking on the “Poster presentation” linked provided next to the title.

THE POSTERS PRESENTED ARE LISTED BELOW: 1.

Social Entrepreneurship Education in American MBA Programs and the Potential for Enriching Curricula

Development of an Assessment Tool

A typology of social enterprises in

The Input of the United Nations

13. Hybridity dimensions - explorative study Poland – processes and outcomes

Gender, violence and the entrepreneurial

14. To work within a socially innovative

spirit: An analysis of the Mujer Carioca

organization as a source of job satisfaction

Empreendedora/Brasil project

and well-being at work? Insights from

Beyond 501(c)3s: Social Enterprise

Social innovation for the inclusion of Context, challenges and proposal (PDF)

social enterprises in the elderly home care in Wallonia 15. The Phenomenon of the Valuable Creation in Social Entrepreneurship: A Study in Spain 16. Taking a look at the other side of the story: the failure of social enterprises 17. Scaling up choosing social franchising

The transformation of the non-profit

as a way to maximize social enterprise’s

organisation to a more entrepreneurial

impact: issues raised from a partnership

form within a developing country context

research project

Managerial capabilities development of social enterprises from Charity retailing in China: how do managers enhance leadership through learning? Evaluating the Influence of Effectuation on new Social Enterprise Ventures in Ireland

10. Partnership and Social Entrepreneurship. A longitudinal study on the creation of a hybrid support structure for Brussels 32

behaviour?

of social enterprise organizations in

people with reduced mobility in Brazil:

context – an explanation for coordinating

Integration Social Enterprises

presentation)

12. Reciprocity in inter-firm cooperation

with Disabilities to the Concept of Work

Management Education (INME) (Poster

11. Unpacking the Foundational Dimensions of Work Integration Social Enterprise –

Competencies for International Nonprofit

emergence

Conceptualization of Social Business

Convention on the Rights of Persons

of the processes of organizational

by Incorporating a European

Hungary (Poster presentation) 3.

social entrepreneurs: an exploration

18. The process of building legitimacy for social enterprises in China 19. The transition principles of China green enterprises 20. Social sustainability and civil society organizations (Poster presentation) 21. Impact of Demonetization on Social Entrepreneurial Effectiveness

CONFERENCE REPORT

6th EMES International Research Conference on Social Enterprise | LLN, 3-6 July, 2017

Opportunities for participants 34

CONFERENCE REPORT

BOOK SIGNING EVENT The Weight of the Social Economy,

The Social Enterprise Zoo: A

Social Entrepreneurship and Social

An International Perspective

Guide for Perplexed Scholars,

Enterprises: Nordic Perspectives

2015, Peter Lang, Brussels

Entrepreneurs, Philanthropists,

2016, Routledge

Author present for signing:

Leaders, Investors, and

Author present for signing:

Marie J. Bouchard

Policymakers

Malin Gawell and Roger Spear

2016, Edward Elgar Publishing Summary: What is the weight of the social economy? How should

Author present for signing: Dennis Young

we measure it? Throughout the

Summary: Social enterpreneurship and social enterprises share the potential to make the difference

world, cooperatives, non-profit

Summary: The Social Enterprise

for people and societies. The

and mutual benefit organizations,

Zoo employs the metaphor

Nordic countries represent an

foundations and other social

of the zoo to gain a more

interesting regional case, due to

enterprises play an important role

comprehensive understanding of

their distinctive welfare system,

in job creation, social cohesion,

social enterprise â&#x20AC;&#x201C; especially the

and institutions arising from their

social innovation, regional

diversity of its forms; the various

cultural/social dynamics. In this

development and environmental

ways it is organized in different

book the editors demonstrate

protection. Observations tend to

socio-political environments; how

how the leading narratives and

confirm the ability of the social

different forms of enterprise

discourses that have shaped the

economy to contribute to balancing

behave, interact, and thrive; and

Nordic societies, also shape the

economies, mainly by serving as

what lessons can be drawn for the

narratives and development of

an anti-cyclical force in the face of

future development and study of

social enterpreneurship and social

economic crises. However, many

organizations that seek to balance

enterprises.

countries and regions lack statistical

social or environmental impact with

information about its weight, size

economic success. Recommended

and scope on their territory. This

for students, researchers,

book fills a gap in the literature

policymakers, entrepreneurs

about the social economy. It seeks

and managers of social purpose

to explain why it is important to

organizations.

have statistics on it, to understand how they are produced, and to project how the social economy might be better understood in the future. The book offers researchers and decision-makers an overview of the current state of knowledge on these topics.

A economia solidária e os desafios

Économie sociale et solidaire -

globais

Socioéconomie du 3e secteur

2017, EduFSCar

2017, Deboeck Superieur

Author present for signing:

Author present for signing: Jacques

Isabelle Hillenkamp

Defourny and Marthe Nyssens

différentes et prouver à quel point nos sociétés ont besoin d’une économie plurielle. Confiés aux meilleurs spécialistes du monde francophone, les chapitres de cet ouvrage se présentent tous comme des synthèses des connaissances

Summary (in Portuguese): O

Summary (in French): Économie

actuelles, d’une part sur les

livro é resultado do I Congresso

sociale, économie solidaire,

fondements et les acteurs majeurs

de Pesquisadores de Economia

entreprise sociale… : autant de

de l’ESS, d’autre part sur l’ensemble

Solidária (I Conpes), ocorrido na

concepts et d’approches qui

de ses enjeux contemporains.

Universidade Federal de São Carlos

permettent d’appréhender une

Combinant des éclairages

em junho de 2015. O evento

partie de plus en plus importante,

théoriques multiples, il s’adresse en

foi organizado pela Associação

et pourtant méconnue, de nos

premier lieu aux enseignants, aux

Brasileira de Pesquisadores de

économies. Représentant jusqu’à

étudiants et aux chercheurs, mais

Economia Solidária (ABPES),

15 % de l’emploi salarié et des

aussi aux professionnels qui ont

contando com o apoio da Pró-

millions de volontaires, ce «

besoin de se ressourcer ou d’affiner

Reitoria de Pós-Graduação, da Pró-

troisième secteur » se distingue du

leurs grilles d’analyse.

Reitoria de Extensão e do Núcleo

secteur privé de type capitaliste

Multidisciplinar e Integrado de

comme du secteur public et

Estudos, Formação e Intervenção em

apparaît comme une réponse,

Economia Solidária (NuMI-EcoSol)

partielle mais pertinente, à de

da UFSCar, além dos seguintes

nombreux défis d’aujourd’hui:

programas de pós-graduação

lutte contre le chômage et

em sociologia dessa mesma

l’exclusion sociale, services

universidade: Sociologia (PPGS),

de proximité, développement

Terapia Ocupacional (PPGTO) e

durable, etc. Par ses dynamiques

Ciência, Tecnologia e Sociedade

entrepreneuriales, l’ESS défriche

Summary: This book applies

(PPGCTS). Entre os autores, estão

de nouvelles activités porteuses

benefits theory to the financing of

alguns dos principais pesquisadores

d’emploi. Par ses valeurs – finalité

nonprofit and other social purpose

dessa temática e que atuam na

de service, gestion démocratique,

organizations. Individual chapters

Argentina, no Brasil, na França, em

autonomie, solidarité -, elle inspire

are devoted to organizations

Portugal e no Uruguai. Os textos

confiance aux citoyens comme aux

primarily reliant on earned income,

foram selecionados do conjunto

pouvoirs publics, qui lui confient

gifts, government support and

de trabalhos elaborados para o

des missions d’intérêt général. En

investment income, respectively,

congresso. Seus temas abrangem

offrant une analyse rigoureuse

as well as organizations that are

cooperativismo, autogestão,

de l’économie sociale et solidaire

highly diversified in their sources

políticas públicas, relações de

et des entreprises sociales qui se

of operating support. The book is

gênero, desenvolvimento territorial

multiplient dans le monde entier,

intended to guide managers and

e formação de empreendimentos

cet ouvrage poursuit une grande

leaders towards finding the best

econômicos solidários. Trata-se de

ambition : fournir les outils d’une

mix of income sources for their

um rico painel de experiências e

compréhension en profondeur

organizations, to help educate

análises.

de ces formes d’entreprise

future managers about resource

Financing Nonprofits and Other Social Enterprises: A Benefits Approach 2017, Edward Elgar Publishing Author present for signing: Dennis Young

CONFERENCE REPORT

development and to stimulate

theoretically-based framework for

¿Las políticas de austeridad

additional research on the financing

understanding these institutional

han destruido realmente tejido

of nonprofits and other forms of

and other influences by means

asociativo y de ONGs? ¿Las

social enterprise.

of quantitative analysis as well as

crecientes necesidades sociales

qualitative critiques from eight

derivadas de la crisis han recibido

countries that help validate and

mayor atención por parte del tercer

refine it. The concluding chapter

sector? ¿Ha habido diferencias

offers a revision of the framework

entre el tercer sector de los

based on the critiques. New

diferentes países europeos? ¿Qué

features include more attention to

políticas públicas se pueden

culture and micro- and meso-level

proponer para dar un nuevo

forces as well as the introduction

impulso al tercer sector? Estas han

of optional framework components

sido las principales cuestiones que

Summary: ‘Shaping Social

that address rarely occurring

han sido abordadas por un equipo

Enterprise’ offers the first

country situations. Two new social

de investigación interdisciplinar de

tested framework that helps

enterprise country models are also

ocho países y varias universidades

identify institutional influences

added and new applications of the

europeas, a través de un proyecto

affecting social enterprise. For

framework are detailed.

de investigación financiado por el

Shaping Social Social Enterprise: Understanding Institutional Context and Influence 2017, Emerald Group Publishing Author present for signing: Emre Coskun

well over a decade, scholars and practitioners have known that social enterprise looks different in different contexts but few have attempted to understand why. Kerlin’s work in this area is the first to consider the influence of large

7º Programa Marco de la UE entre El tercer sector en España y en Europa. Crisis y resiliencia 2017, Universitat de Valencia Author present for signing:

2014 y 2016. Esta obra recoge una síntesis de los principales resultados, especialmente aquellos relativos al caso español.

Rafael Chaves

institutions such as government, economy, civil society, and culture

Summary (in Spanish): ¿Qué

on the development of social

impacto ha tenido la crisis en

enterprise. This book provides an

el tercer sector europeo y en el

in-depth assessment of Kerlin’s

tercer sector español en particular?

GENERAL ICSEM MEETING The 3rd General ICSEM Meeting took place right after the 6th EMES International Research Conference on Social Enterprise. The meeting brought together close to 60 participants from 35 countries and all continents. The meeting started with an overview of the Project’s achievements during its second phase (from July 2015 to July 2017). New publications (ICSEM Working Papers and transversal publications) as well as the ICSEM international database were presented. The second day was devoted to focus group discussions about future publication projects, i.e. three books about SE models (respectively in Asia, Europe and Latin America) and special issues of the Social Enterprise Journal and the Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics. The program of the day is available on the ICSEM website.

6th EMES International Research Conference on Social Enterprise | LLN, 3-6 July, 2017

BEST PAPER AWARD & BEST PHD PRESENTATION Best Conference Paper For the third edition of this Award, the winners of

“Social entrepreneurship in southeastern Europe –

the “Best Conference Paper” are Brett Fairbairn

Comparative analysis of the case of Croatia, Serbia

from University of Saskatchewan (Canada), and

and Greece”.

Markus Hanisch from Humboldt University (Germany) for their paper “Social Innovation, Conflict and the Institutionalization of German Energy Co-operatives”.

Konstantina, PhD student from University of Vienna, explains that the paper is an update on her master thesis pursued during her studies on Southeastern

“My first reaction was surprise.” says Brett Fairbairn

European Studies at the University of Athens. She

after he received the notification about the award.

clarifies her motives for a very unusual choice of

“I have not attended EMES before, and I went to the

countries: “Given the fact that I was looking also

conference to learn from other researchers. I hope

into the influence of international actors, I focused

additional exposure means that people will send us

on the status/ relation of each country with the

comments and suggestions.”

EU: A longtime member (Greece), a new member

In their paper, which draws lessons from the example of energy system transformation for the theory

(Croatia) and a candidate country (Serbia). The interest in the region is also because the region is “in between” Austria and Greece, and has a very

of innovation, the authors argue that the German

interesting interconnected past, presence and future

transformation of renewables was triggered by innovative state policies and cognitive dissonance. Afterwards it was driven by both economic

as my involvement with The Balkan Forum teaches me every day.”

incentives and citizen collective action. Because the

More concretely, besides the analysis and

cooperative is a proven form for collective finance

comparison of the legal and institutional frameworks

and participatory multi-stakeholder organization,

in Croatia, Greece and Serbia, her paper focuses

there was a widespread adaptation and rapid

specifically on how international, European and

diffusion of renewable energy cooperatives in the

national actors are shaping the development of

period covered in the article.

social enterprises in these countries. The paper attempts to identify the stages of development,

Brett further highlights his expectations about contribution of the paper to the future research “I hope our paper will draw further attention to the idea of social innovation. Properly defined and theorized (as we tried to do in the paper), social innovation is a powerful way to understand what successful social enterprises do.”

similarities, differences and challenges of this emerging sector. Further she adds some observations about particularities and challenges of this region: “When we speak about the development of the sector, we often tend to take examples from countries and regions where access to financial and human capital are advanced and taken for granted in many ways. In the region, you can see the notion that this is not the case and that it takes

Best PhD Paper Category

cooperation, mindfulness with the use of resources and consciousness that different models are possible.”

Given the commitment of EMES with emerging scholars, the Award specifically distinguishes a

As Konstantina says “The EMES research conference

PhD category but it also aims to emphasize the

was my first international academic conference where

work of researchers who are in the initial phases

I presented and therefore the honour of getting

of their careers. This year we were happy to have

awarded was even more intense. As practitioners we

on board the Bernheim Foundation, which kindly

are in between spaces like activism, policy, academia

agreed to sponsor an award in the PhD category.

and we understand the significance that we create

The winner of this year “Best PhD Paper Award” is

bridges so that understanding and knowledge from

Konstantina Zoehrer with her comparative paper

all of them are connected and thrive.” To download the full version of the papers click on the title of the paper.

CONFERENCE REPORT

6TH EMES SELECTED CONFERENCE PAPERS

Following the Conference, a series of papers were selected based on the evaluation of the session chairs and published on the conference page. They are available to download to all visitors to the EMES network website. Please note that these papers were not reviewed as for a publication process and they may be a different stages of the research process. For more information about the papers, we encourage you to contact the author(s) directly. The list below includes a first selection but others will be added in the future.

 Brett Fairbairn, and Markus Hanisch (2017) “Social

 Philip Marcel Karré and Valérie Mossel (2017)

Innovation, Conflict and the Institutionalization of

“Between a rock and a hard place: the hybrid

German Energy Co-operatives”, Canada and Germany

character of social enterprises”, The Netherlands

 Konstantina Zoehrer (2017) “Social

 Patrick Reichert, Marek Hudon, Marc Labie (2017)

entrepreneurship in southeastern Europe –

“What is an Acceptable Level of Profit for a Hybrid

Comparative analysis of the case of Croatia, Serbia

Organization? Insights from microfinance”, Belgium

and Greece”, Greece

 Cris Bravo Monge(2017) “Identifying cross-country

 Tetsuya Morita (2017) “Toward a conceptual

key drivers of social entrepreneurial activity”, United

framework for religious logics on institutional

States

complexity: a lesson from ‘mission drift’ in Evangelical Christian social entrepreneurs in Ethiopia”, Japan  Marie J. Bouchard, Maude Léonard, Damien Rousselière, Sonia Tello-Rozas (2017) “Impacting social economy ecosystem through solidarity

 Luiz Inacio Gaiger(2017) “The Informal Economy: theoretical and conceptual issues”, Brazil  Rene Mendoza Vidaurre, Nicaragua and Johan Bastiaensen (2017) “Toward the re-invention of fair trade. The case of Central America”, Belgium

financing: the case of a solidarity finance institution”,

 Yoobin Lee, Sanghoon Lee and Yena Lee (2017) “A

Canada

Study on the Ethical Consumption Gap”, South Korea

6th EMES International Research Conference on Social Enterprise | LLN, 3-6 July, 2017

Event promotion PROMOTIONAL POSTERS

LLN

2017 Social enterprise for Transdisciplinary sustainable Forum societies SOCIAL ENTERPRISE FOR

Following the experience of previous years, a conference poster and a Forum poster were produced in electronic and paper version. They were distributed via email to interested members and stakeholders to promote the event in their respective institutions.

(French & English)

SUSTAINABLE SOCIETIES

03 - 06 JULY | 17 LOUVAIN-LA-NEUVE BELGIUM

From research to practice and back 03.07.17 LLN

10:00 - 19:00

Practitioners and researchers will exchange views and learn from each other on topics such as:

We are open to debate on Twitter: @emesnetwork

Social innovation and social services

Renewable energy cooperatives (REScoop) and community energy Digitalization

Development cooperation

Social economy impact assessment

17:30-19:00 Opening Plenary Session 19:30-21:00 Welcoming cocktail reception Venue:

Auditoire Socrate, Place Cardinal Mercier, 10 1348 Louvain-la-Neuve

For more information and to register go to www.uclouvain.be/en/chercher/cirtes Organized by

Supported by

CONFERENCE UPDATES News about the Conference were included regularly on the EMES News Alert, which is distributed to over 1,440 subscribers. In addition, they were also posted on the social media, mainly Twitter and Facebook. The news alerts archive can be accessed here.

EMES NEWS & STORIES In preparation of the Conference, we added a new section to emes.net: EMES News & Stories. The aim of this blog-type of page is to bring EMESâ&#x20AC;&#x2122; activities closer to its members and visitors of our website. Accessible at emes.net/news

Avec le soutien de

CONFERENCE REPORT

EMES WEBSITE VISITS Map Overlay | 142 countries

www.emes.net April 10, 2017 - Jul 09, 2017 Visits

13,028

Visitors

7,651

Pages / Visit

Pages views

% New Visits

Avg. Visit Duration

33,07

53.94%

2.53

00:02:57

Sessions on emes.net 13K vs 12K same period: 3 months to conference. Especially during the conference, there was an intensive

Apr 10, 2017 - Jul 09, 2017: Apr 13, 2015 - Jul 12, 2015:

Sessions Sessions

increase of sessions, even though this year new articles werenâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;t available at the time.

Long-term stable visitors have increased during this period (7day to 30 day). This shows a fidelity improvement.

Source

Google Analytics

6th EMES International Research Conference on Social Enterprise | LLN, 3-6 July, 2017

SOCIAL NETWORK Total Page “Likes” April 10, 2017 - Jul 09, 2017

Facebook page | Likes 2,3 K

2,2 K

Your average April 10, 2017

2,110 Your average July 09,2017

2,1 K

2,225

Apr

Jul

Twitter overwiew EMES’ Followers

1,100 followers reached

63.7K Impresions*

10% growth on this 91 days period

700 impresions per day in 2017

26.0K Impresions 285 impresions per day in the same period of 2015

* Impressions are how many times your tweet has been seen. It goes much further than that because if a tweet it shared or commented on, their followers see it, which makes impressions go up. If someone searches the hashtag that is in your tweet, then they will add an impression.

CONFERENCE REPORT

Participantsâ&#x20AC;&#x2122; evaluation

As always, every new event offers an opportunity for EMES to learn in order to improve future editions. In this context, it is of utmost importance to enable formal and informal channels for participants to offer them. On the one hand, EMES prepared an evaluation survey that was delivered to all 380 registered conference participants and reached a response rate of over 55% (159).

In a scale of 1 (poor) to 10 (excellent), the overall quality of the conference was ranked over 7 by 93% of the respondents; out of which 14% rated it as excellent.

6th EMES International Research Conference on Social Enterprise | LLN, 3-6 July, 2017

In addition, it is very important to capture more in-depth thoughts and testimonies that some of the participants shared with us. Particularly, we wanted to share the testimonials of three researchers from three corners of the world: HyungSik Eum from Korea; Catalina Quiroz from Peru, and Lauren Jankelowitz from South Africa.

HyungSik Eum, Korea | Belgium “I have participated in the EMES international research

approaches. If what happened in previous conferences

conferences since the joint-conference of ISTR and

was more mutual learning among different theoretical

EMES held in Barcelona, 2008. For a sociologist, EMES

approaches and different regional and national

conferences have been excellent fields for observing

contexts, in this conference, participants seemed not to

how the concept of social enterprise has evolved in

avoid making critical comments and questions during

interaction with other concepts and diverse practices in

discussions with colleagues from different disciplines

the field. During these conferences, as a participatory

and different countries. I think that this was possible

observer, I could see dynamic changes in the contents

thanks to more common ground for understanding

of the conferences. I don’t know if my impression would

and, in turn, it allowed participants to propose bolder

be my own personal one or if it could be considered

ideas rather than just being passive learners. For me,

a common feeling shared by other participants…

it seemed like a process of constructing a collective

Anyway… At the initial conferences, I remember how

intelligence community different from just a conference

the enthusiasm of discovering and understanding

in which individual researchers want to take their part.

diverse entities which might be called social enterprises across the world prevailed. However, after certain moments, I could observe that various concepts such as social entrepreneurs, social entrepreneurship, social innovation and social business etc. appearing among the many discussed topics. It was very interesting to see how dialogues among various concepts occurred and reached certain common understanding. But, on the other hand, I felt not only curiosity concerning different concepts but also some concern and worry about them. As new concepts, the lack of commonly agreed definitions, methods and empirical data were often stated as problematic. Even, I wondered, if we were saying roughly the same things while using same terms. During this 6th conference, by chance or not, I could find interesting advancements in the contents and debates, at least in the sessions I attended. Beyond enthusiasm and concern facing new social phenomenon and concepts, I could hear more introspective perspectives on the phenomenon relying on more solid theoretical foundation, well-elaborated data and appropriate methodologies, including comparative

Research and researchers are not outside the phenomenon that they are studying. They are also part of, even important part of the phenomenon, which tries to make sense of the phenomenon in relying on the voice of field as well as more systematic reflections. In this sense, the EMES network and its conferences have been important part of the phenomenon around the development of social enterprise concept. I believe that the advances in research field observed in this conference are not only result of and for academic community, but also a proof that shows that the emerging field of social enterprise is becoming mature. Now, I’m feeling that we are more organic part of a collective intelligence which makes sense of a phenomenon in which brave people are trying to change the society. Someday, A.I. might dominate various fields of knowledge, but I’m sure that it can not dominate the field of knowledge on social enterprises, because it will never be able to dance for sharing a sense of collectivity with colleagues like we do…”

CONFERENCE REPORT

Catalina Quiroz, Peru | United Kingdom

Lauren Jankelowitz, South Africa

“At the organizational level, I felt that I was very well

“Firstly, many thanks again for accepting me into

informed in order to organise my trip and lodging well

this network and always welcoming me so warmly to

in advance. Details were clear, useful and practical. As

participate, even from so far away. EMES has helped

for the Conference itself, meeting with like-minded and

me feel less isolated, and allowed me to see myself as a

committed people within the field enabled delegates to

(beginning) serious academic. My school has embraced

have in-depth discussions about relevant issues and how

the support I’ve received and is keen now to pursue

to face new challenges to tackle in order to keep and

greater collaboration. The conference was a great

guard the ethos and values of the social and solidarity

opportunity to network and meet and make friends

economy model. All exchanges were very refreshing and

who think in a similar way and also feel passionately

energized. I did appreciate the different spaces opened

about similar issues, who embrace rather than dismiss a

to specific sectors and research interests from different

practice perspective, who are engaging and interested

geographical regions. It made the conference inclusive

in even new scholars. To meet people like Dennis Young,

and relevant in terms of gaining updated knowledge.

who I have been reading for so many years as a social

I had the opportunity to present a paper within line 3 (Governance, employment and human resource management) and I appreciated the time given and most importantly the time for discussion among peers.

worker; to be able to debate adapting/extending the SE ideal types triangle with the people who developed it and whom I respect and admire greatly, to be immersed in thinking through the social and the economic, to be spoilt with PhD-focused learning (and play)

As for what I would like to see in next EMES events, I’d

opportunities, to find many potential collaborators,

say to bring in relevant private sector stakeholders, from

and to have many knowledgeable engagements on

SMEs to multinationals from different economic sectors

strategy-as-practice was so thrilling and stimulating.

to be able to share insights about social innovation

As exhausting as conferences are, I feel energised and

towards aiming the SDGs. Also, to discuss controversial

exhilarated. I look forward to continuing to be part of

issues surrounding different approaches to creating value

this network. Congratulations for pulling together such

within society.”

an impressive lineup of people talking on relevant and timely issues, and for providing space for inexperienced academics to present papers alongside experienced ones. Thanks also for an excellent poster session and the opportunity to present. That was where I made my most important contacts.”

As organizers of the EMES International Research Conferences, we are every time deeply moved and thankful for the expressions of gratitude and support that we receive in the course and after the event actually takes place. We have no qualm admitting that these personal testimonies constitute the fuel that keeps us moving as motivated and enthusiastic individuals working to consolidate social enterprise as a research field and to create a vibrant community.

6th EMES International Research Conference on Social Enterprise | LLN, 3-6 July, 2017

The team Local scientific committee: CIRTES: Florence Degavre, Andreia Lemaître, Marthe Nyssens, Annais Périlleux

Local organising committee: CIRTES: Géraldine Goffe, Viviane Faucon EMES: Michaela Lednova, Rocío Nogales, Sabine Spada

Next appointment 46

CONFERENCE REPORT

On-site team: CIRTES: Dédé Aliango Marchato, Olivier Brolis, Ela Callorda Fossati, Donatienne Desmette, Julie Hermans, Maïté Kervyn, Louise Lambert, Thomas Pongo, María José Ruiz Rivera, Elisabetta Severi UCL student team: Christel Berger, Marie Cartuyvels, Sibylle Delhaye, Madeline Deloge, Jean-François Delvigne, Valentine Fleury, Elise Habib, Elodie Jacquemin, Coline Minguet, Jeanne Nechelput, Johan Rennotte, Coline Ugeux, Léna Vandermoere, Manon Vandermoere Communication: Teresa Bolaños, Emek Filogullari, Pedro Soria, Sebastián Unda

The 7th EMES International Research Conference will take place in Sheffield, United Kingdom and it will be hosted by newest EMES institutional member, Sheffield Hallam University.

If you have ideas or suggestions that you would like us to consider when preparing this major event, please let us know by writing to us at 7emesconf@emes.net

6th EMES International Research Conference on Social Enterprise | LLN, 3-6 July, 2017

CONFERENCE REPORT

Supported by

JULY 201

Hosted by

03- 0

Organized by

www.emes.net 50

3lastic.com