Proposal group 3

Page 1

WIND TUNNEL

EMILY LUCCHESI NEHA NAGARKAR ANDREEA ONOFREIASA 1


1. VIEW FROM LITTLE MERMAID STATUE (ABOVE RIGHT) 2. VIEW FROM FERRY (DIRECTLY ABOVE)

1

2

4

3 3. VIEW FROM APPROACH (BELOW RIGHT) 4. VIEW FROM TOP OF ADJACENT BUILDING (DIRECTLY BELOW)

2


3


SECTION CUTE (AS DISPLAYED IN CONTOUR PLAN)

WATER ON LEFT - INLAND ON RIGHT

FACING WATER

4


CONTOUR PLAN VIEW - SECTION CUT IN RED (DISPLAYED ABOVE)

5


6


1. ENTRANCE VIEW 2. LOOKING BACK TO THE CITY

2 3

1

3. INTERNAL VIEW DAY TIME (BOTTOM LEFT) NIGHT TIME (BOTTOM RIGHT)

7


Flat surface to catch the wind

Thin width, streamlining against the wind

8

Hollowed section for light weigth area Thick section for weighted bottom -stability(varies per arch)

Curv for s


ved bottom to allow swaying movement

511KW per year for 24, 16 metre arches, experiencing 5 compression per hour

DIAGRAMATIC- movement / technology 9


10


11


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.