Interim Assessment Student Comparisons

First Name Last Name Advisory Jamaya Kones Ole Miss 7 Myalani Hall Virginia 7 Alvin Ashton Ferguson Virginia 7 Mylene Guzman Ole Miss 7 Jose Arceo Ole Miss 7 Anterriyo Williams Virginia 7 Gerardo Lopez Virginia 7 Pedro Teague Ole Miss 7 Student A is a high-performing student who Dilcia Burgos Maldonado Virginia 7 experienced 24% growth between Q2 and Q3.

Jesus Avalos Ole Miss 7 When compared to his fall 2018 MAP score, Anna Aurioles Arkansas 7 this student also experienced some growth.

Fabian Tirado Virginia 7 Marvin Alvarado Yanez Ole Miss 7 Edward Cruz Kentucky 7 Jessica Cosme Guzman Kentucky 7 Amber Eckert Ole Miss 7 Rosa Martinez Virginia 7 Christian Douglass Kentucky 7 Sharon Kirkwood Virginia 7 Student B is a low-performing student who is Liliana Lopez Kentucky 7 also classified as ESL and ELL. This student Cesar Cantillano Urbina Arkansas 7 is evidence of dramatic academic growth, Skye scoring only 40% Pounds Kentucky in Q1 and 79% in Q3. 7 Dario Rodriguez Kentucky 7 Aulajah Williams Ole Miss 7 Carrie Rainey Arkansas 7 Diego Lopez Virginia 7 Michael Lewis Ole Miss 7 Jessica Juarez Pena Arkansas 7 Tamaya Bradley Arkansas 7 Milan-Joel Pfahler Ole Miss 7

MAP Rdg % 10 8 67 21 1 54 17 10 81 85 71 69 29 59 25 85 96 57 79 71 17 54 59 89 62 51 67 59 85 87

IA1 IA2 Growth IA2 to IA3 IA3 #N/A 32% #N/A #N/A #N/A 27% #N/A #N/A 80% 45% #N/A #N/A 80% 41% #N/A #N/A 45% #N/A #N/A #N/A 40% 59% #N/A #N/A 40% #N/A #N/A #N/A 40% #N/A #N/A #N/A 65% 50% 38% 88% 90% 64% 24% 88% 85% 68% 19% 88% 75% 68% 19% 88% 70% 41% 42% 83% 85% 45% 38% 83% 60% 45% 38% 83% #N/A 59% 24% 83% 80% 59% 24% 83% 75% 64% 20% 83% 85% 68% 15% 83% 85% 68% 15% 83% 40% 23% 56% 79% 80% 41% 38% 79% 90% 45% 34% 79% 90% 50% 29% 79% #N/A 55% 25% 79% 75% 55% 25% 79% 70% 59% 20% 79% 55% 59% 20% 79% #N/A 64% 16% 79% 90% 68% 11% 79%

First Name

Last Name

Advisory

Mahmood Murshed Virginia 7 Joselyn Lopez Kentucky 7 Genesis Gomez Ole Miss 7 Logan Rutledge Virginia 7 Brenda Quiroz-Trejo Kentucky 7 Chri-Stan Payne Arkansas 7 Kelsy Miranda Ole Miss 7 Aaron Isidro Jr. Kentucky 7 Helen Garcia Ole Miss 7 Paola Ocampo Arkansas 7 Arely Garcia Arellano Virginia 7 Dustin Lazarin Femat Ole Miss 7 Jose Miranda Arkansas 7 Student C is a mid-performing student who Sherlyn Rodriguez Ole Miss 7 also experienced dramatic academic growth, Jazmin Zuniga Arkansas 7 improving from a 55% mastery in Q1 to a 71% Victor Soto Kentucky 7 in Q3.

Zykeria Anderson Virginia 7 Briana Romero Virginia 7 Emilia Soriano Ole Miss 7 Mariela Rodriguez Arkansas 7 Nierria Johnson Virginia 7 Mohammad Frutan Kentucky 7 Destiny Robinson Kentucky 7 Heli Rodriguez Virginia 7 Jayden Square Arkansas 7 Yuridia Avalos Ole Miss 7 Jacob McKinney Virginia 7 Allie Dillingham Kentucky 7 Ruby Tate Ole Miss 7 Jina Noguez Arizmendi Kentucky 7 Miguel Munoz Virginia 7

MAP Rdg %

81 73 77 75 59 69 64 67 54 44 51 73 95 73 51 46 29 46 54 25 67 29 57 71 62 62 62 87 62 36 51

IA1

IA2

85% 80% 85% 70% 70% 70% 65% 80% 80% 80% 75% 80% #N/A 70% 55% 55% 55% 60% 80% 55% 85% 80% 70% 85% 45% #N/A 75% 70% 60% 65% 70%

68% 68% 73% 41% 45% 55% 55% 59% 59% 59% 59% 64% 73% 77% 36% 45% 45% 55% 59% 64% 68% 68% 77% 36% 55% 45% 50% 50% 64% #N/A 41%

Growth IA2 to IA3 11% 11% 6% 34% 30% 20% 20% 16% 16% 16% 16% 11% 2% -2% 34% 25% 25% 16% 12% 7% 3% 3% -6% 30% 12% 17% 13% 13% -1% #N/A 17%

IA3

79% 79% 79% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 71% 71% 71% 71% 71% 71% 71% 71% 71% 67% 67% 63% 63% 63% 63% 58% 58%

First Name

Last Name

Advisory

Francisco Aguilar Virginia Student D is a low-performing student who 7 Melanie Ole Miss 7 grew from 45%Ewing mastery in Q1 to 58% Yandel Del Rosario Kentucky mastery in Q3. Dramatic academic growth is 7 Serenity NickelberryStudent D’s Virginia evidence when comparing Q3 7 fall MAP data, 31.Arkansas 7 Fernando score to theCarbajal Soloures Reynolds Virginia 7 Yulissa Suarez Virginia 7 Naydelyn Romero Virginia 7 Tamya Yancey Arkansas 7 Irvin Ibarra Kentucky 7 Jaylen Anderson Kentucky 7 Kelvin Davila Arkansas 7 Jayson Arrington Ole Miss 7 Student E is a low-performing student who Michael Rodriguez Arkansas 7 also receives IEP accommodations and Destiny McLeod Virginia 7 modifications. This student’s IA scores Kylan Ambrose Ole Miss 7 actually declined from Q1 to Q3; however, this Jesus Munoz Kentucky 7 student grew significantly when compared to Gadiany Bravo Martinez Ole Miss 7 the fall MAP score of only 1%.

Brannon Ross Arkansas 7 Jeremy Williams Arkansas 7 Paris Romero Martinez Kentucky 7 Enrique Lopez Arkansas 7 Joseph Lewis Arkansas 7 Ashley Robinson Kentucky 7 Maura Green Ole Miss 7 Romeo Miranda Arkansas 7 Jose Mares Hernandez Virginia 7 Juan Zepeda Lopez Ole Miss 7 Andrea Perez Arkansas 7 Oreat Umer Arkansas 7 Esmeralda Mena Kentucky 7

MAP Rdg %

73 46 31 73 34 13 34 9 11 27 46 39 59 67 59 1 5 77 81 9 23 39 1 1 59 4 1 41 11 19 17

IA1

IA2

35% 55% 45% 75% 60% 70% 65% 50% 20% 65% 80% 60% #N/A 50% 80% 70% 55% 60% 55% 45% 65% 55% 45% 35% 70% 55% 20% 80% 30% 90% 55%

41% 50% 50% 55% 55% #N/A #N/A #N/A 23% 27% 32% 36% 45% 55% 36% 41% 45% 50% 50% 59% 64% 41% 41% 41% 50% 68% 5% 41% 45% 50% 55%

Growth IA2 to IA3 17% 8% 8% 4% 4% #N/A #N/A #N/A 31% 27% 22% 18% 9% 0% 14% 9% 5% 0% 0% -9% -14% 5% 5% 5% -4% -22% 37% 1% -4% -8% -13%

IA3

58% 58% 58% 58% 58% 54% 54% 54% 54% 54% 54% 54% 54% 54% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 46% 46% 46% 46% 46% 42% 42% 42% 42% 42%

First Name

Last Name

Advisory

Jerett Joseline Oscar Paola Brian Kevin Anthony Victor Denise Evelyn Raquel Paris Emily Natalie Treshure Luis Diego Taniya Michael Vanesa

Williams Diaz Romero Roman Gomez-Lopez Balderrama Mendoza Rodriguez Ramos Ramirez Martinez Pulliam Arellano Nunez Anderson Ramirez Ramirez Nickelberry Dennis Munoz

Kentucky 7 Virginia 7 Virginia 7 Virginia 7 Kentucky 7 Ole Miss 7 Arkansas 7 Arkansas 7 Ole Miss 7 Arkansas 7 Kentucky 7 Kentucky 7 Kentucky 7 Ole Miss 7 Arkansas 7 Arkansas 7 Arkansas 7 Kentucky 7 Kentucky 7 Ole Miss 7

MAP Rdg %

4 41 25 34 3 19 11 34 7 2 6 3 5 27 21 1 1 3 10 25

IA1

IA2

40% 65% 60% 55% 60% 40% 30% 45% 40% 40% 55% 55% 29% 70% 45% 40% 40% 40% #N/A 75%

55% 59% 45% 50% #N/A 18% 18% 41% 41% 41% #N/A #N/A 45% 50% 50% 55% 41% 59% 9% #N/A

Growth IA2 to IA3 -13% -17% -8% -13% #N/A 15% 15% -8% -8% -8% #N/A #N/A -16% -21% -21% -30% -20% -38% 8% #N/A

IA3

42% 42% 38% 38% 33% 33% 33% 33% 33% 33% 29% 29% 29% 29% 29% 25% 21% 21% 17% 13%