HOME HELP
ORNL-TM-2478
DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION, AND TESTING O F A LARGE MOLTEN SALT FILTER
R. B. Lindauer and C. K. M c G l o t h l a n I
L E G A L NOTICE This report -I wewed u an .ccoullt of Qovernment sponsored w r k . Neither the United Bt.tes, war UIO Commission.wr MYperm acting on behall of the Commission: A. flakas m y r ~ ~or npresentatlon. t y expressed or implied. xlth reapact to the m u racy. completeneea. or usefulness of the b f o ~ t l o n coatuhed In W s or tbat &-be Of MY h f O r ~ t l W-tu*. metbod. or process disclosed In this report may not infrfnge privably owned rlghb; or B. ArIumes uy W i U t i e s xlth m m t to the nae of. or for -8 resulting from the of hfor-flon, mmrntun, method. or process disclosed In t h t m report. AB wed h the above. “permn acting on k W of the ~ommi.sh** h i a s .ny employ~ or contractor of the Comrmssion, or employee of such contractor. to the extent that such employee or contractorof the conmissl~n.or emaoyee of N C ~ -tractor mpanu. dta.eminates, or provides a m a s to, .ny informationpv.uant to u s employment or nmtnet , r l t b &e Commission. or Us employment aith sueh mtractor.
-*
i
MARCH 1969
OAK RIDGE NATIONAL MBORATORY O a k R i d g e , Tennessee operated by UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION f o r the U. S. ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION
f@€RlBlJ‘flON OF THIS OOCUMENC Is U N L T P
t E
iii
...
comms
.
c
Eiâ‚ŹE
.............................1 INTROIXTCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 DESIGNCRITERIA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 Physical Layout of the System . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 Sequence of Operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 Quantities of Corrosion Products t o be Handled . . . . . . . . 4 Pressurebop . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 Temperature . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 Pressure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 Maintenance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 EXPERIMENTALPROGRAM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 Reduction of Corrosion Products Fluorides . . . . . . . . . . 6 Salt F i l t r a t i o n Studies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 FINALDESIGN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
ABSTRACT
Analysis of MSRE Fuel C e l l S a l t F i l t e r Pressure Vessel
....
8
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .13 Electric Heater Design . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 Instrumentation Design . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 FABRICATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . a20 F i l t e r Element Design
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 Shop Fabrication . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 Quality Assdrance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 Schedule and Cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 INSTALLATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . a 2 2 PLAWTPERFORMANCE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 ACKNOBNT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - 2 7 REFERENCES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .28 APPENDIX (Fabrication Drawi . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 029 Procurement of Materials
. m
kf &
b
1 .
DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION, AND TESTING OF A LARGE MOLTEN SALT F I L m R. B. Lindauer and C. K. McGlothlan
ABSTRACT
The Molten S a l t Reactor Experiment uses mixtures of fluoride s a l t s a s fuel.
Routine on-site processing of these molten salts r e s u l t s i n
formation of corrosion products.
This report describes development,
design, construction, installation, and t e s t i n g of a large s a l t f i l t e r t o remove these corrosion products.
The f i l t e r is designed t o remove
approximately 1 5 kilograms of corrosion products from 9000 kilograms of flush and f u e l s a l t a t a temperature of 1200OF.
INTRODUCTION
The fuel i n the Molten-Salt Reactor Experiment (MSRE) i s a molten mixture of fluoride s a l t s (LiF, BeF2, ZrF4, and UF4).
The UF4 required
f o r c r i t i c a l i t y i s less than one mole percent of the mixture. a forerunner of breeders operating i n the thorium-"W wlth
23%.
Sufficient "%
The MSRE,
cycle, s t a r t e d up
later became available and the experimental
program of the reactor was expanded t o include operation with t h i s f i s s i l e material. 'Y The changeover involved stripping the o r i g i n a l UF4 from the other fluorides ( c a r r i e r s a l t ) by the fluoride v o l a t i l i t y process, i n an on-site processing plant,
then adding 23%F4-LiF as required.
The fluorination of the lt is accompanied by. formation of corrosionproduct fluorides which, i f l e f t i n the c a r r i e r salt, would i n t e r f e r e with the routine monitoring of corrosion during reactor operation. I n principle, the corrosion products could be removed simply by reducing them t o insoluble metallic form, then f i l t e r i n g the molten s a l t . A problem was the f i l t e r . Small sintered-metal f i l t e r s had been used extensively t o f i l t e r
I
2 molten salts a t temperatures t o 1200째F, but the design of a f i l t e r f o r t h i s high temperature and large enough t o handle around 15 kg of corrosion
products i n go00 kg of salt was a different order of magnitude.
This
report t e l l s how such a f i l t e r was successfilly developed and used.
1 --!
It
. I
describes the concept, development tests, f i n a l design, construction, installation, and operation. DESIGN CRIYEXIA Physical Layout of the System
Figure 1 shows the piping layout of the f i l t e r , storage and processing tanks. The s a l t i n l e t l i n e of the f i l t e r i s about 6 f t higher i n elevation than the maximum s a l t l e v e l i n the processing tank. From the bottom of the f i l t e r the molten s a l t d r a i n s by g r a v i t y t o the storage tanks, about .20f t below i n another c e l l .
Sequence of Operations
-
Two 70-ft3 batches of s a l t were t o be processed the f l u s h s a l t and the h e 1 salt. Salt properties are given i n Table 1. The operation was t o begin with transfer of an e n t i r e s a l t batch, by helium gas pressure from one of the storage tanks, through the f i l t e r t o the processing tank. A t this time the s a l t should contain e s s e n t i a l l y no s o l i d s and should back-flow through the clean f i l t e r element with very l i t t l e pressure drop. The s a l t was t o be sparged with gaseous fluorine t o convert the UF4 t o v o l a t i l e m6 which leaves the salt t o be collected on NaF. During t h i s fluorination corrosion of the Hastelloy-N(') vessel would produce NiFa, FeF2, and CrF2, a l l of which are soluble i n the salt. . Since these
-
- -
(')Ni, Mo, C r , -Fe (70 18 7 54) specially developed a l l o y with high temperature strength and corrosion r e s i s t a n t t o molten s a l t . Cammercially available from Haynes S t e l l i t e a s f"astelloy-Nf' and I n t e r national Nickel Co. as 1x0-806.
I
4
3
I
ci
ORNL DWG. 68-8661 O P E R A T I N G ARE
*FILTER SALT INLET
--IC
,sc L
4
REOUCflON
4 soluble fluorides would i n t e r f e r e with corrosion monitoring during reactor operation, they would have t o be removed fram the salt. The NiF2
1
would be reduced by hydrogen sparging t o metallic nickel and the FeF2 and CrF2 w o u l d be reduced with pressed zirconium m e t a l shavings t o Fe and C r metal. The s a l t batch would then be f i l t e r e d t o remove these precipitated metals before being sent t o the s a l t storage tanks.
Table 1 Properties of Fuel and Flush S a l t s
Fuel
silta
Flush Salta
Camposition, mole $: LiF BeF2 ZrF4 uF4
65
66
29.2
34
5
9
Average Physical Properties: Viscosity, lb/f t-hr Density, l b / f t 3 Liquidus Temperature, OF
N
0.82
@ 1200째F
18 147 813
-
0.03
t 7
@ 1065째F
20 126
856
a After 15,000 hours of f u e l s a l t circulation i n the reactor piping system and before fluorination of the salt.
Quantities of Corrosion Products t o be Handled Since s a l t of t h i s composition had never been fluorinated i n plantscale e q u i p e n t the exact corrosion rate was not known. However, because of the smaller surface/volume r a t i o it was expected that corrosion would be less than the 0.5 m i l / h r experienced i n small scale work. Assuming a corrosion rate of 0.1m i l / h r and a t o t a l fluorine sparge time (flush
+
f u e l s a l t ) of 70 hours, it was estimated that 1 5 kg of
rn
4
5 corrosion products as metal would be produced.
One f i l t e r element should
h a v e s u f f i c i e n t volume on the upstream side o f the f i l t e r media f o r t h i s weight of m e t a l i f the bulk density is not lower than 50% of the s o l i d metal density.
A large safety f a c t o r i n the f i l t e r capacity was the
large amount of metals remaining as sediment i n the feed tank during small scale f i l t e r t e s t s . Pressure Drop The f i l t e r element must withstand a pressure d i f f e r e n t i a l of 18 psig tending t o collapse the f i l t e r during f i l t r a t i o n .
This is 1504 of the
minimum pressure a t the end of the f i l t r a t i o n when the transfer gas pressure releases through the loaded f i l t e r . The f i l t e r element must a l s o withstand a pressure d i f f e r e n t i a l of 30 psig tending t o burst the f i l t e r media during t r a n s f e r t o the processing tank. This i s 150s of the s a l t head from the bottom of the storage tank t o the f i l t e r element. 5 4;
Temperature
,f
c
The f i l t e r element must have the required strength a t 1200"F, which
is the maximum expected temperature during s a l t transfer. Pressure The maximum pressure on the f i l t e r housing w i l l be 30 psig. Maintenance
The f i l t e r element must be replaceable by remote maintenance i n case of plugging.
,
EXPERIMENSlALPROGRAM
The selection of a h i
-c
emperature f i l t e r media f o r molten s a l t i s
t o materials that have high-temperature strength, corrosion resistance i n molten salt, and adequate f i l t r a t i o n efficiency. The tempera-
limited
ture and corrosion requirements l i m i t the material selection t o high-nickel alloys such as Inconel and Hastelloy-N.
Inconel was chosen because of
6 availability.
To s e l e c t the type and s i z e of f i l t e r media that would
s a t i s f a c t o r i l y remove the corrosion products expected i n fluorination of the MSRE f u e l and f l u s h s a l t s required an experimental p r ~ g r a m . ~The
?
I n the f i r s t part,
experimental program was composed of t w o parts.
molten s a l t was prepared t o simulate the conditions expected a f t e r f l u o r i nation of the MSRE f u e l salt.
The second part consisted of s a l t - f i l t r a t i o n t e s t s of two'types of f i l t e r media under conditions which approximated those anticipated i n the reactor application. Reduction of Corrosion Products Fluorides \
The experimental program was carried out with a lobkg batch of the fluoride mixture, LiF-BeF2-ZrF,
(65
- 30 - 5 mole $) which was prepared
from the cmponent fluoride salts by routine production procedures.
After
treatment t o remove oxygen and sulphur impurities, CrF2, FeF2, and N U 2 were added t o the salt mixture t o simulate the conditions expected a f t e r fluorination of the MSRE f i e 1 s a l t . The s a l t mixture was hydrofluorinated t o insure cmplete dissolution of the corrosion product fluorides. Analysis of
8
f
--
filtered sample of the s a l t taken a f t e r dissolution is
.
cmpared with expected concentrations i n Table 2. The N i F 2 i n the salt mixture was reduced with a hydrogen sparge and the gas effluent periodically analyzed f o r HJ?.
Since equilibrium data
produced very low hydrogen u t i l i z a t i o n during reduction of FeF2 and CrF2, data were obtained on reduction of these fluorides with pressed zirconium metal turnings added t o the salt mixture. Analysis of f i l t e r e d samples taken near the conclusion of the zirconium addition period a r e also shown i n Table 2. S a l t F i l t r a t i o n Studies F i l t r a t i o n t e s t s were conducted using 40-p pore s i z e sintered porous nickel (Micro Metallics Corp.) and two grades (20 and 41-11 pore s i z e ) of sintered f i b e r metal (Huyck Metals Co;).
Each f i l t e r was fabricated as a
*
2-5/8111, diameter plate so t h a t geometric surface areas of all f i l t e r s would be identical. The experimental assembly used f o r the f i l t r a t i o n t e s t s was ess ent ia l l y that used f o r the routine production of fluoride mixtures.
Tests were
W
Table 2 Corrosion Product Fluorides i n Batch of Salt f o r F i l t e r Media T e s t
Material
Quantity Added (g)
Estimated * Concentration (PPI
CrF2
80
445
470
9
26
FeF2
50
286
620
60
44
NiF2
800
4680
3700
G O
36
*Concentrations reported
on a m e t a l basis.
Results of Analysis of Filtered Samples* (ppm) After HydroAfter Addition After Addition fluorination of 253 g Z r of 327 g Z r
8
ci
made under s t a t i c conditions by allowing the melt t o remain quiescent f o r a minimum time of 4 hours prior t o transfer, and a l s o made by rapidly sparging the melt with helium j u s t p r i o r t o salt t r a n s f e r a t 650"~. The
1
pressure drop across the f i l t e r varied from 22.5 t o 20.8 p s i a s the l e v e l
*
of salt i n - t h e treatment vessel decreased.
A summary of the f i l t r a t i o n
t e s t s i s shown i n Table 3. The f i b e r metal media (designed FM-250 by the manufacturer) which had a porosity of 78%and a s t a t e d removal efficiency of 98$ f o r particles larger than 10 microns i n diameter was recommended f o r the MSRE. F i l t r a t i o n times f o r t h i s material were about 1.19 and 1.36 hours per cubic foot of s a l t mixture (Runs 7 and 4). The occasional plugging of the f i l t e r i n Tests 4 and 5 suggests t h a t the loading capacity of the 40-micron f i l t e r s may be about 50 t o 75 grams of metal particles o r about 9 t o 14 grams per square inch of f i l t e r surface. Samples of the s a l t mixture were taken before the first f i l t r a t i o n experiment and downstream frm the f i l t e r p l a t e a f t e r Tests 4, 6, and 7. Analysis of these samples a r e given i n Table 4.
Only 1.8 t o 3.4% of
metals reduced frm solution passed through the FV-250 f i b e r metal media. It was concluded that the FM-250 f i b e r metal media would f i l t e r as
w e l l a s the porous metal media t h a t had been used successfully t o f i l t e r small batches of the original s a l t loadings f o r the MSRE and was l e s s susceptible t o plugging. FINAL DESIGN
Analysis of MSRE f i e 1 C e l l S a l t E l l t e r Pressure Vessel
Calculations were made t o determine that s t r e s s e s i n the pressure vessel f o r the f i l t e r would be within the allowable s t r e s s e s f o r Class-C vessels of Section I11 of the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.' Design data a r e given i n Table 5 and construction d e t a i l s a r e shown on Drawings E-NN-D-49036and E-NN-D-49037.
c*
4
BI
1)
e
8)
Table 3 Summary of F i l t r a t i o n Tests LiF-BeF2-ZrF4 (65-30-5 mole $) 104 1 kg
S a l t Composition: W t of S a l t Mixture:
Volume of S a l t a t 6 5 0 " ~ : Indicated Pressure Differential: Pore Diameter Microns
11 psig forepressure vs vacuum
Transfer Time Hours
Weight Gain Grams
Test No.
Filter Material
1
Monel f i b e r metal
20
Static
2
Porous Nickel
40
static
0.5
3
Porous Nickel
40
Agitated
1.75
44
4
347
41
Static
2.0
77
Test stopped a f t e r 90 kg transfer.
5
Porous Nickel
40
static
2.17
63
F i l t e r plugged a f t e r 40 kg transfer. Material on f i l t e r predaminantly salt.
6
Porous Nickel
40
static
1.84
19
7
347
41
Agitated
2.0
67
8
Porous Nickel
40
static
1.75
22
SS f i b e r metal
SS f i b e r metal
Salt Conditions
.
1.7 f t 3
22
7
Remarks
.
Test terminated after 2 hrs Essentially no s a l t transfer.
No v i s i b l e material on f i l t e r o r evidence of f a i l u r e .
I
Balance of salt transferred f i l t e r ruptured.
80 kg back transfer of salt from receiver t o treatment vessel. F i l t e r plugged.
10
Table 4
Summery of Analytical Results During F i l t r a t i o n Tests
Sample Interval Filtered Sample
Cr
Ni
Fe
Total
Before Test 1
26
15 16 17
44 66
106
After Test 4
36 84 256
132
19
49
After Test 6 After Test 7
\
Impurity Concentration (ppm)
165 404 85
c
c"
11
Table 5 Design Data f o r Large S a l t F i l t e r
GENERAL Construction Material Pneumatic Pressure Test Pressure Vessel without F i l t e r Element, psig F i l t e r Element Inner Core Can, psig H e l i u m Vacuum Leak Rate t o Inside Pressure Vessel (without f i l t e r element), cc/sec of helium ent Inner Core Can, cc/sec of helium e Pressure Veasel, OF i l t e r Element, O F Pressure, psig Operating Temperature, OF Maximum )OpWa$ing Pressure, psig Maximum
Inconel 600 625?: 100
ax ax
1 0 ' 8 10-8
1200 1200
35 1200
35
FJXFER IRESSURE VESSEL
6 inch, Sch. 40, pipe
Size Length S a l t I n l e t and Outlet Size Access f o r F i l t e r Element
7 feet-10 inches 1/2 inch, Sch. 40, pipe
Flange Seal
R-45, 0-king, Copper, Leak-
6 inch, 300 lb, ring j o i n t flange (special) detected (special)
F I L m EItFMENT
F i l t e r Media Porosity, $J Mean Pore Size (Microns) F i l t e r a t i o n Rating when Filtering Liquids N o m i n a l (98$), microns
FM-250 Feltmetal
84 59 10
..
..
,
.
.
.
,
._*.
..
_ _ _ _ _ ..
I
_ _".._ _ . .. .
Table 5
FILTE'R EWESIENT (continued) Tensile Strength Q 100째F, p s i Q 1200째F, p s i Modulus of E l a s t i c i t y Q 1200째F, p s i Thickness, inch Pressure Drop f o r Clean Water 6 10 gpm/ft2 i n p s i Q LOO gpn/ft2 i n p s i Total F i l t e r i n g Area, f t 2 F i l t e r Media-Perforated Metal Support Thickness, inch Open Area, $ Quantity of S a l t t o be F i l t e r , kg
*
a
...
.~
...
..
-~
"_.
-
.
.... ,
..
. ...
. . . ..
(continued)
800
571 3.5 x 10-5 0.096 0.1
0.85 8.65 0.078 32
9, 000
. .
.
.
.
. .
.
.~
~
..
Stresses i n the vessel a r e due t o the 35-psig internal pressure and the a x i a l temperature gradient along the vessel from the heated section
a t 1200'F through a 25-in. i n s u l a t e d section and a 7-1/2-in. bare m e t a l section a t 200째F on the end. The a x i a l temperature gradient causes discontinuity stresses because of the resulting d i f f e r e n t i a l r a d i a l expansion of the vessel. The temperature gradient was determined through t h e use of the " A s t r a
Heating"* computer program a t approximately 1-in. increments f o r the
32.5-h. on length outside t h e heated zone. The maximum temperature differential of 5 6 " ~ per l i n e a r inch is near the heated zone a t the highest temperature and lowest allowable stress.
There i s no tempera-
ture gradient across the w a l l of the pipe so there a r e no r a d i a l thermal stresses. The sum of the stresses due t o pressure and the temperature gradient are less than three times the Code allowable s t r e s s f o r primary stresses,
s o the design i s therefore satisfactory. F i l t e r Element Design I n small scale batch operations, sintered porous nickel f i l t e r s have been used successfully as reported earlier.
However, it was decided
t o investigate t h e use of fiber m e t a l f i l t e r media f o r possible improvement i n capacity.
Although experimental tests did not show any s i g n i f i -
cant improvement i n performance, it was decided t o use the f i b e r metal , a v a i l a b i l i t y t o fabrication requirements. because of i t s a d a p t a b i l i t I d have t o be fabricated by the manu(A cylindrical porous f i l t facturer.)
Inconel was chosen as the material of construction not only
because of i t s strength a t elevated temperature, but a l s o because of i t s corrosion resistance t o molten salt.
*Generalized
Heat Conduction Code written f o r the 1134-6090Computer by ASTRA, INC. under contract t o the Atomic Power Developnent Associates of Detroit, Michigan, (Fermi Reactor); reported as The Heating Program, Heat Engineering and Transfer i n Nine Geometries, R. R. Liguori and J. W. Stephenson, ASTRA, IN!., Raleigh, North Carolina, January 1, 1961.
I
14 Both the burst (from internal pressure) and the collapse strength
.
of the inner and outer f i l t e r elements were considered i n the design of the f i l t e r element. Design data a r e given i n Table 5. The burst strength i s important only during back flow when transferring s a l t t o the processing tank. The formula6 p = -2 s t Ziia was used i n the calculation where s is the t e n s i l e strength of t h e f i b e r
metal a t I20O0F.
s
(Incone1 @ 1 2 0 0 0 ~ x s (fiber metal @ 100') = 73,000 x 800 = 571 psi. = s (Inconel @ 100~)
The outer f i l t e r element was calculated t o have a burst strength of 25 p s i and the inner f i l t e r 34 psi with no safety factor. The worst conceivable case would be i f the f i l t e r element were almost completely r e s t r i c t e d from the f l u s h s a l t f i l t r a t i o n and the f u e l s a l t was then transferred t o the processing tank. Since the burst strength of the outer ZtZment is l e s s than the 30 psig specified i n the design c r i t e r i s , the buoyancy of the f i l t e r i n the salt on t r a n s f e r t o the processing tank i s necessary f o r
the f i l t e r t o meet the burst strength requirement.
The f i l t e r element
has a weight of 57 lbs and a horizontal area of 25 in.2.
Construction d e t a i l s are shown on Drawing E-NN-D-49038 and Figures 2 and 3. A pressure
of only 2.3 psi w i l l therefore cause f l o t a t i o n of the element and bypassing of salt through the seat. This pressure i s f u r t h e r reduced by the buoyancy of the element so there i s no danger of rupture of the element if the filter i s above the melting point of the s a l t . To prevent collapse of the f i l t e r element it was necessary t o provide a perforated back-up plate against the inner f i l t e r surface. The maximum
external pressure i s applied t o the f i l t e r a t the end of f i l t r a t i o n when the transfer gas pressure blows i n t o the gas space above the f i l t e r element.
A t t h i s time there w i l l a l s o be the maximum r e s t r i c t i o n of the
f i l t e r from collected solids. I n calculating the collapse strength, the E t3 was used where E i s the modulus of e l a s t i c i t y , formula7 ps = (1-m2)~3 t and D a r e the thickness and diameter of the element and m i s Poisson's
I
e
w
3
kd
'
15
3 0)
rl
0)
3 5
a 0 I3
16
,
F i g . 3.
F i l t e r Element, Bottom View.
r a t i o (0.3).
E f o r the--$iber metal is 1.75% f s o l i d Inconel and i s
3.5 x lo5 p s i
@ 1200'F.
Considering the f i b e r metal without the backup,
the outer element has a collapse strength of only 6.5 p s i and the inner element 16.3 p s i without a safety factor.
i
Since the minimum f i n a l t r a n s -
f e r pressure is 12 p s i f o r the h e 1 salt (without any flow LIP), it is evident that a backup i s required.
An 0.078-in.
thick Inconel perforated
sheet with 32$ open area was used as a backup because of availability. This plate alone has a collapse strength ( f o r the larger element) of 131 psi. To provide a safety factor of 4 the operating procedure speci-
fies a maximum transfer plus gas space pressure of 35 psi. The f i l t e r element can move upward during s a l t back-flowing and by-pass s a l t through the seat, but it has t o reseal after f l o t a t i o n t o minimize leakage i n the main direction of s a l t flow. Mating spherical seating surfaces are provided between the f i l t e r element and pressure vessel f o r ease i n self-sealing. Electric Heater Design 1
Electric heaters a r e provided t o permit preheating of the f i l t e r and t o maintain the temperature of the s a l t during a transfer. Maintenance ,
requirements are minimieed by designing the heaters with excess capacity so they can be operated a t reduced voltage t o promote longer l i f e . A l s o duplicate spare heaters a r e i n s t a l l e d and connected ready f o r use with
only minor, out-of-cell wiring changes, The tubular heaters are 0.315-in. OD Inconel sheath with nichrome elements rated 500 w a t t s per foot of heater.
A layer of s t a i n l e s s s t e e l shim stock is i n s t a l l e d between the
heaters and the thermal insulation t o prevent the heaters from being i n d i r e c t contact with the insulation. The controls that a r e used l i m i t the available i n s t a l l e d capacity t o 3500 watts; 2400 watts i n the lower control (FSF-1) and 1000 watts i n the upper control (FSF-2). (See Drawing E-NIT-D-49036.) Control of the e l e c t r i c a l input t o the heaters i s from manual powerstats. The voltage s e t t i n g required was determined during s t a r t u p testing, and manual stops
were set t o l i m i t the controls t o hold the temperature t o l3OO'F
o r below.
During s t a r t u p testing, 1600 watts f o r the lower section and 500 watts f o r
18 the upper section were required t o preheat the f i l t e r .
Only the heaters
on the lower section a r e required f o r normal t r a n s f e r of salt.
If s a l t
freezes i n the upper section of the f i l t e r because of unforeseen d i f f i culties, heaters on the upper control w i l l be used t o preheat t h i s section
.
t
Instrumentation Design A helium supply is provided and instrumented t o assure the presence
of a gas cushion i n the f i l t e r a t a l l times and t o purge the connecting l i n e s with helium before f i l t r a t i o n .
Temperature instruments are pro-
vided both t o indicate t h a t the equipment i s above the s a l t melting point and as an indication of s a l t level. Figure 4 shows the helium supply t o the f i l t e r .
The solenoid valve
i s interlocked with the s a l t freeze valves t o prevent the accidental pressuring of molten s a l t from a s a l t storage tank t o the reactor by helium through the f i l t e r .
Accidental f i l l i n g of the reactor is further
prevented by the pressure control valve limiting the pressure t o 15 psig
-
-
s u f f i c i e n t t o f i l l the reactor only 1/2 f u l l and the flow r e s t r i c t o r only which would l i m i t the s a l t transfer rate t o 5 l i t e r s per minute 30% of the normal reactor fill rate. The check valves prevent back-flow
-
of radioactive gases t o the operating area. PI-B indicates the pressure i n the gas space above the f i l t e r element. This pressure is transmitted t o the operating area by a transmitter contained i n a cubicle vented t o t h e processing cell. Temperatures a r e monitored by eleven thermocouples attached t o the outer w a l l of the f i l t e r housing. 0
- 2000OF recorder.
Nine of these are read out on a
The other two ( a t the same elevation as Points 7
and 9 ) are connected t o temperature switches which actuate annunciators and provide interlock contacts i n the pressurization and vent valve
control c i r c u i t s .
Since the upper heater w i l l be normally off, tempera-
t u r e points 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9 w i l l be heated only by conduction unless t h e salt l e v e l rises higher than normal. If t h i s occurs there w i l l be an
alarm and the pressurization valve w i l l close when point 7 reaches 1000'F. When point 9 reaches 350'F there k i l l be an alrm, the pressurization valve
*
ORNL DWG. 68-8663 50 PSlG HELIUM SUPPLY
RESSURE CONTROL VALVE
15 PSlG
SOLENOID VALVE
r I II
I
-1 FLOW RESTRICTOR
I
I
CONTAINMEN1 CUBICLE
I*I . I
PROCESSING CELL
FILTER FLOW
Fig. 4. Helium Supply Instrumentation.
SALT FLOW
20
w i l l close and the salt-tank vent valve w i l l open.
Rise i n s a l t l e v e l
could be caused by a restricted f i l t e r element, leaking ring-joint flange and/or leaking check valves.
z
FABRICATION Procurement of Materials ,-,
A l l salt-containing parts are fabricated from Inconel-600 material.
Pipe, fitting, and p l a t e were purchased from vendors according t o applicable American Society f o r Testing and Materials Specif icationss with certified chemical and physical properties.
After receipt i n O m ,
the material received addition l i q u i d penetrantg and ultrasonic inspection. 10
This inspection is routinely given material used t o fabricate MSRE equip-
ment t h a t w i l l contain high-temperature radioactive gases and fluids. This additional inspection is considered p a r t i a l insurance against equip-
ment f a i l u r e and the need f o r expensive and time-consuming remote maintenance
.
t
The f i l t e r media (sintered Inconel f i b e r s ) was purchased i n 18 x 20-inch sheets from Huyck Metals Company.
I
This special material was
selected and purchased after numerous consultations with the vendor about i t s unique design properties.
Shop Fabrication The f i l t e r housing and element were fabricated i n Oak Ridge National
Laboratory shops f r m Drawings E-NN-D-49036, E-NN-D-49037,
and E - N N - D - ~ W ~ ~ .
High quality nuclear fabrication specifications and techniques that m e t o r exceeded t h e requirements f o r Class ffCO vessels of Section I11 of the ASME ttPressure Vessel Codevf5were used t o fabricate the f i l t e r .
Forming
and welding of the fibrous Inconel filter-media metal’’ required the development of special fabrication techniques. Special procedures were a l s o D
u t i l i z e d t o prevent the filter-media from becoming contaminated with foreign material during fabrication. welds11 of a l l Inconel pressure-containing parts were liquid-penetrant inspectedg and radiographed. l2 Other Inconel welds received liquid-penetrant
/
-
cd
L
21
inspection. spected.
Welds of the fibrous metal filter-media were visually i n -
A l l welding was performed by welders qualified i n the weld pro-
cedures specified on the drawings. A pneumatic t e s t was performed on the pressure vessel, without the
f i l t e r element, as specified i n ASME Code. The inner core can of the f i l t e r element was pneumatically tested a t 100 psig t o insure against f a i l u r e a t operating pressure and temperature. After pneumatic t e s t s , the pressure vessel and inner core can of the
f i l t e r element were separately leak-tested by evacuating the inside and
flooding the outside with helium. than 1x
lo8
Helium leakage t o the inside was less
cc/sec of both subassemblies.
A polydispersed aerosol, dioctylphthalate (DOP) was forced through
the fibrous metal f i l t e r element a t various stages of fabrication and monitored t o determine i f any large cracks had developed during fabrication. guality Assurance The s a l t f i l t e r i s designed t o operate a t 1200'F temperature and 35-psig pressure and contain highly radioactive f l u i d s and gases.
Since
remote maintenance of radioactive equipment i s d i f f i c u l t and time-consuming, every effort, within practical limits, was made t o obtain t h e necessary quality l e v e l t o minimize maintenance on the f i l t e r during the l i f e of t h e experiment. Once the adequate quality l e v e l was established, necessary material requirements, fabrication specifications, and t e s t procedures were selected and placed on fabrication drawings.
These drawings, special in-
structions, and inspected material were delivered t o the shop f o r fabrication.
Discussions betwe
hop management, inspectors, and MSRE
t o discuss the quality of fabrication desired, possible problem areas, and completion schedule. This was done t o reduce the possibility of misunderstanding and the possible reduction i n representatives were arran
c
quality and/or additional c o s t and additional time t o rebuild the f i l t e r . One of the most important factors f o r good quality assurance is the
f
L 4
establishment of a strong, working relationship between project management,
22
shop management, and inspection personnel t o make sure the requirements on the drawings a r e followed and the r e s u l t s reported. Schedule and Cost Conceptual design and developnent t e s t s began i n l a t e November 1967. They progressed concurrently u n t i l completion i n l a t e January 1968.
Procurement began i n mid-January 1968 and materials were received and inspected i n time t o begin fabrication i n l a t e February. Fabrication of one f i l t e r assembly and one spare f i l t e r element was completed and t e s t e d by l a t e March 1968. Fabrication costs of one f i l t e r housing and two f i l t e r elements consists of $4800 f o r material, $1300 f o r material inspection, and $5200
f o r shop labor.
The f i l t e r assembly was i n s t a l l e d i n the fuel-processing system a f t e r a l l other piping was completed (see Fig. 5). Since the fuelprocessing c e l l i s comparatively small and crowded, some d i f f i c u l t y was encountered i n locating the assembly.
One of the prime requirements i n
locating the f i l t e r was t o provide d i r e c t access from above so that f i l t e r elements could be replaced by remote maintenance techniques. Close coordination between the i n s t a l l e r s and the remote maintenance group i n locating the f i l t e r assembly resulted i n the f i l t e r assembly being ins t a l l e d i n a location which is accessible f o r element replacement with minimum d i f f i c u l t y
.
Welding caused some problems since part of the piping system was contaminated with small quantities of non-radioactive s a l t from a previous
. This s a l t had t o be completely removed from the immediate weld area t o prevent contamination of the connecting welds. Valuable assistance t e s t run.
was given by the welding inspection group on the best methods t o follow i n
cleaning and welding i n t h i s contaminated piping system.
As a r e s u l t
of close cooperation, a l l welding passed the necessary inspection and t e s t specifications.
.
23
.
Fig. 5.
Filter Assembly Installed in Fuel Processing Cell.
24
-
u PLANT PERFORMANCE On May 6, 1968 an opportunity was provided f o r determining the temperature distribution prior t o radioactive operation. To compensate f o r past and anticipated removals of s a l t from the reactor f u e l system, 3-1/2 ft3of clean c a r r i e r s a l t (67 mol 4 LiF, 33% BeF2) was passed through the f i l t e r . Figure 6 shows the temperature distribution over the upper h a l f ( g a s space) of the f i l t e r .
Also shown are the temperatures
obtained later with the flush and f u e l s a l t f i l t r a t i o n s which correspond closely.
Frm these temperatures,
the temperature switches a t points 7
and 9 were s e t t o alarm and stop s a l t transfer a t 1000째F and 350째F respectively.
The temperature 2 inches below the ring j o i n t (Pt. 9)
was only 250째F indicating t h a t the uninsulated flange j o i n t was probably
below 200OF. The remote leak detection on the flange indicated no leakage during the heat-up, transfer, o r subsequent cool-down. During August 1968, both flush and f u e l s a l t batches were transferred
e
t o the processing tank through the f i l t e r , fluorinated, the s t r u c t u r a l m e t a l fluorides reduced and the salt f i l t e r e d as it was returned t o the
reactor drain tanks.
I n each of these operations there was no detectable
pressure drop across the f i l t e r and the f i l t r a t i o n was accomplished i n about two hours. The amount of m e t a l s removed from the s a l t i s shown i n Table 6. The t o t a l of both batches is 10 kg. Since visual inspection of the processing tank after f i l t r a t i o n was not possible it i s not known how much of the reduced metals remained i n the tank and how much i s on the f i l t e r element.
3
25
c4 ORNLDWG. 68-8662 1200
1100.
I
4
1000-
900.
800-
Y
0
500.
400
100
100.
I r,
10
DISTANCE ABOVE SALT INLET, INCHES
Fig. 6.
Salt Filter Temperatures.
26 Table 6 Radioactive Salt F i l t r a t i o n Chanaes i n Concentration Ppm Cr
Ni
Fe
Total
516 26
210
133
-
&
76
Removed by F i l t e r
490
69
57
616
Fuel S a l t Before Reduction
840
60
400 110
420
2
1660 204
780
290
386
1456
Flush Salt Before Reduction After Reduction and f i l t r a t i o n
A f t e r Reduction and Filtration
Removed by F i l t e r
859 ,.&
i
Weights Removed, Grams ~
~
Ni
Fe
Cr
From Flush Salt
2110
From Fuel S a l t
3900
297 1450
245 1930
Total
2652 7280
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
W e gratefully acknowledge the contributions of the following Reactor
Division personnel: C. W. Collins f o r assistance i n preparing the section on Pressure Vessel Design.
P. N. Haubenreich f o r assistance i n preparing the Introduction and report content.
T. L. Hudson f o r assistance i n preparing the section on Electric Heating Design.
B. H. Webster f o r assistance i n preparing the section on Installation. J. H. Shaffer and L. E. McNeese of Reactor Chemistry Division f o r performing and reporting the developmental work. Information contained i n t h e i r CF Report has been condensed and included i n t h i s report.
t
28 FBFE3WEES 1.
J. R. Engel, MSRE Design and Operations Report, Part XI-A, T e s t Program f o r 23% Operation, USAEC Report ORNL-TM-2304, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, September 1968
.
2.
P. N. Haubenreich e t al., MSRE Desi n and Operations Report, Part V-A, Safety Analysis of Operation with % ' J, USAEC Report ORML-TM-2lll, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, February 1968.
3.
R. B. Lindauer, MSRE Design and Operations Report, Part V I I , Fuel Handling and Processing Plant, USAEC Reports ORNL-TM-9O7 and 907 Revised, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, May 1965 and December 1967.
4.
J. H. Schaffer and L. E. McNeese, Removal of Ni, Fe, and C r Fluorides from Simulated MSm Fuel Carrier Salt, ORNL-CF-68-4-41, April 16, 1968 (for i n t e r n a l distribution only).
..
5.
Nuclear Vessels, Section 111, ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York, 1963.
6.
V. M. Faires, Design of Machine Elements, Madillan, New York,
1948, P. 91.
z
7.
D i d , p. 463.
8.
Nonferrous Metal Specifications, Brt 2, ASTM Standards, American Society f o r Testing Materials, Philadelphia, Pa., 1961.
9.
Tentative Methods f o r Liquid-Pentrant Inspection, MGT-NM!-4, Inspection Specifications, Metals and Ceramics Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, August 8, 1963 ( f o r i n t e r n a l distribution only)
10.
Tentative Methods f o r Ultrasonic Inspection of Metal Plate and Sheet, MET-NEC-1; M e d l Rod and Ear, MET-NM-2; Metal Pipe and Tubing, MET-NIE-3, Inspection Specifications, Metals and Ceramics Division, Oak Ridge National Iaboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, 1962 and 1963 (for i n t e r n a l distribution only)
.
11.
12.
Procedure Specifications f o r Direct Current I n e r t Arc Welding of Inconel Plpe and Plate, FS-1, Inconel Tubes, PS-2, Inconel t o S t e l l , PS-46, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee ( f o r i n t e r n a l distribution only). Tentative Method of Controlliw Quality of Radiographite Testing, MET-Nrm-5, Inspection Specifications, Metals and-Ceramics Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, 1962 (for i n t e r n a l distribution only).
1
APPENDIX
Fabrication Drawings - S a l t
-
E - N N - D - ~ ~ o ~ Assembly ~
E-NN-D-49037 E-D"-D-4938
Filter
- Details - F i l t e r Element Subassembly - Details
c
N
v ' 7
d
P b
- ...
...
__ . .
N
w
,
c
33
I I
5 1
z
b
i" I
1 d
CU1.O. M I D m . . i
@cLoauPr WKLechu?
Fe
.
35
'u
ORNL-TM-2478 Internal Distribution
IC
1. 2.
3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11 12.
.
13 14. 15 16. 17
18. 19
.
20. 21. 22
.
23 24. 25 26. 27
9
28.
29 30
31 32 33 34-39. 40.
J. L. Anderson C. S. M. E. R.
41. 42. 43. 44. 45. 46-51. 52. 53. 54. 55. 56. 57. 58. 59. 60. 61. 62. 63. 64. 65. 66. 67. 68. 69. 70. 71.
F. B e s E. Beall Bender S.
Bettis
Blumberg
E. G. Bohlmann R. B. Briggs C. W. Collins W. B. C o t t r e l l J. L. Crowley F. L. Culler S. J. D i t t o W. P. Eatherly J. R. Engel D. E. Ferguson L. M. Ferris J. K. Franzreb A . P. Fraas C. H. Gabbard R. B. Gallaher W. R. Grimes A. G. Grindell R. H. Guymon P. H. Harley P. N. Haubenreich R. E. Helms H. W. Hoffman T. L. Hudson
72.
73. 74. 75.
P. R. Xizsten
R. J. Ked1 S. S. Kirslis A . I. m k o v i a k R. B. Lindauer M. I. Lundin
,
R. H. R. H. H. C. L. J. A. R. E. A. R.
M. A.
N. G. E. E. C. K. E. R. J. L. L. M. C. W. W.
&yon MacPherson MacPherson McCoy McCurdy
McGlothlan McNeese McWherter Miller Moore
Nicholson Perry Robertson
Rosenthal Savolainen
Dunlap Scott J. H. Shaffer M. J. Skinner A. N. Smith
P, I. D. R. D.
J.
G. Smith Spiewak
A. Sundberg E. Thoma B. Trauger R. Weir E. Whatley C. White D. Whitman
M. J. G. L, V. Wilson Gale Young
76-77. 78-79.
Central Research Library (CW) Document Reference Section (DRS) 80-82. Laboratory Records (LEU)) 83. Laboratory Records (LRD-RC)
External Distribution
84. 85-86. 87. 88-102. 103.
C. B. Deering, AEJ=-OSR T. W. McIntosh, AEC Washington H. M. Roth, AEC-OR0 Division of Technical Information Extension Laboratory and University Division, OR0