Blasting News VOLUME 25 ISSUE 2 2016
IN THIS ISSUE • Equipping Explosives Engineers and Technical Representatives at WEETR (Workshop for Explosives Engineers and Technical Representatives) • AEL expands South American base • Check twice, blast once: The importance of blasthole monitoring
Printed on 100% eco friendly paper
CAPTAINS OF INDUSTRY
Editor’s Note Welcome to our bumper second quarter edition of Blasting News. In this issue we focus on our latest innovative technologies and products in our quest to remain relevant to the market we serve.
CONTENTS 3
AEL CAPTAINS OF INDUSTRY: Meet Denvor Govender
4
AEL KNOWLEDGE SHARING: Equipping Explosives Engineers and Technical Representatives at WEETR (Workshop for Explosives Engineers and Technical Representatives)
8
AEL INTERNATIONAL: AEL expands South American base
10 AEL TECHNICAL CAPABILITY: Check twice, blast once: The importance of blasthole monitoring 14 AEL THOUGHT LEADERSHIP: Explosives Today 17 18 AEL IN THE FIELD: AECI showcases at Expomin 2016 19 AEL PAYING IT FORWARD: AEL partners with Northam Rhinos
In our captains of industry section, we introduce you to another member of our Executive Committee, recently appointed Denvor Govender, Executive: Supply Chain.
Meet Denvor Govender
Under our thought leadership banner, we present the latest instalment of Explosives Today, our technicallydriven customer publication, focusing on blasthole drilling and initiation patterns in surface blasting. Our knowledge sharing segment, offers insight from our internal Workshop for Explosive Engineers and Technical Representatives by providing you with information on our latest featured products, latest product catalogue and stop blasting handbook as well as the top case study based on Assmang Khumani Iron Ore Cost Saving compiled by our subject specialist Robert Erasmus, Field Services Superintendent. On the international front, our General Manager for business development in South America, Alois Kwenda enlightens you about the expansion of our global footprint within Latin America. As an international player we demonstrate our support to various markets with our presence at key industry events such as Expomin 2016 where we showcase our trail-blazing innovations and superior service offerings. Under our AEL technical capability section, we profile our Mining Engineer, Manare Mokoatlo’s work on the importance of blasthole monitoring which she presented at the annual IOQ conference in April this year, empowering fellow engineers with invaluable insights. To subscribe to Blasting News please visit our website www.aelminingservices.com and fill in the subscription form located under the Publications tab. Enjoy your read!
Denvor is Executive: Supply Chain. Role: Responsible for AEL’s Global Supply Chain portfolio. Professional background: Denvor joined AEL in 2014 as Global Supply Chain Manager. With over 22 years of work experience in Global Supply Chain, International Logistics and Global Trade, he has worked at some of the largest multinationals which includes Orica Mining Services. Denvor holds a BCom degree in Supply Chain Management and post-graduate qualifications in Business Management and Procurement & Supply Chain. He completed an EDP- Strategic Leadership at the University of Cape Town and the AECI SMDP at GIBS Business School. Denvor is also a Certified International Supply Chain Professional (IPSMI) and holds a MBB in Lean Six Sigma (Japan).
Eubulus Pillay Cover image: Mirny, Sakha Republic, Russia
Denvor Govender
Contact Details: Eubulus Pillay - Editor Tel: +27 11 606 0313 eubulus.pillay@aelms.com www.aelminingservices.com
Disclaimer This publication does not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of AEL Mining Services Limited management. The copyright to this publication rests in AEL Mining Services Limited. Other product and corporate names used in this publication may be trademarks or registered trademarks of other companies, and are used only for explanation and to the owner’s benefit, without intent to infringe.
2
Blasting News I Second Quarter 2016
Blasting News I Second Quarter 2016
3
AEL KNOWLEDGE SHARING
AEL KNOWLEDGE SHARING
Equipping Explosives Engineers and Technical Representatives at WEETR (Workshop for Explosives Engineers and Technical Representatives) AEL’s WEETR presents an opportunity to emphasise the company’s values and our relentless focus on innovation and commitment to staff through sharing insights on the latest technical methods and projects. This year’s theme for WEETR was Simplexity - technology made simple, fast precise! Simplexity defines AEL’s capabilities in terms of products and services. We offer simplified solutions which are designed and developed for highly complex mining conditions. Our Values Aligning to AEL values of BIGGER (BOLD, INNOVATIVE, GOING GREEN, ENGAGED and RESPONSIBLE), WEETR focused on “Being Innovative”. At the helm of AEL’s innovative spirit, is our R&D department which plays a vital role in keeping our global operations on the frontier of technology with the delivery of groundbreaking innovations. The R&D team is actively involved in partnering with our Mining Optimisation team and our AEL engineers to develop products and solutions, tailored for specific mining applications.
Simplexity achieved through featured products and services at WEETR 2016 Aligned to our WEETR theme of SIMPLEXITY, our featured product range showcased AEL’s cutting edge
44
innovations that aide customers to optimise their operations. AEL’s simplified mining solutions are designed to respond to our customers’ complex mining conditions.
offer numerous benefits in support of conventional explosives in certain applications.
Surface Mining Innovation at its best! AEL’s Surface Bulk Explosives are one of the best researched and developed formulations currently in the market.
The following new generation products offer ease-of-use and desired outcomes to the customer.
The Eco range of products The eco-range has been developed to optimise blast results delivering value throughout the surface mining sector. The substitution of recycled oil for diesel in the emulsion results in an environmentally friendly range of products helping to simply reduce environmental impact. Management of Blast Generated Gasses in Surface Blasting If NOx Fumes are a problem, AEL has a simple solution. Blasting produces a sudden localised release of gases with potentially high concentrations of (Nitric Oxide) NOx. Such gas emissions pose a health risk if people are exposed to them before the fumes can dissipate. Causes of fumes from blasts include emulsion formulation deficient in oil content, or rich in ammonium nitrate content (oxygen rich/positive) or poor diesel absorption by ammonium nitrate prill. InstastemTM InstaStem™ is a non-detonating, selfstemming rock breaking cartridge that is suitable for both soft and hard rock and concrete breaking. InstaStem™ Cartridges, by virtue of its nondetonating performance characteristic
Underground Mining
BIT The Blast Initiation Timer (BIT) is an electronic replacement for the pyrotechnic initiation systems targeted at the underground and surface mining industry. Buffalo Booster This is a replacement to the Pentolite Booster and offers high VOD and detonation pressure similar to current Pentolite, with more forward pressure, lower friction sensitivity than Pentolite and easy lacing up ensuring better vertical positioning in the hole.
Electronics Our electronics offerings facilitate complex blasting projects to achieve a more precise result. Electronic initiation systems enable functions that traditional pyrotechnic systems lack. Besides the immediately obvious benefits of improved environmental blasting conditions such as reduced blast vibration and air blast; the system’s increased timing control allows for accurate blast modelling and optimisation of the initiation sequence, before triggering the blast. DigiShotTM Plus DigiShotTM Plus is the Flagship system in Electronic Detonators. It is an easyto use, reliable electronic initiating
Blasting News News II Second Second Quarter Quarter 2016 2016 Blasting
system with remote firing capability and can be extended to fire very large blasts. BlastWebTM The BlastWeb™ electronic initiation system is designed for underground environments where there is a requirement for ease-of use, limited user interaction and centralised blasting. The BlastWeb™ electronic initiation system is capable of initiating specific AEL electronic detonators.
Cutting Edge Software Our blasting science and software development offers simple solutions by looking at the mining operation holistically to ensure that the benefits are derived from improved efficiency in equipment, plant and beneficiation.
Delegates present at the plenary session
New marketing collateral Product catalogue We are proud to present our latest product catalogue showcasing our wide range of ground-breaking products and comprehensive range of services on offer to optimise customers’ operations. This new product catalogue has been compiled with care to ensure that it is an invaluable reference tool to equip you for the field. Stope handbook launch The Stope Blasting Handbook has been used with great enthusiasm as a reference in mine blasting syllabi. This booklet has been compiled by AEL Mining Services to provide a practical guide for blasting in underground narrow reef mining operations. It has been revised to include new products and to give greater emphasis to critical questions.
AECI Chief Executive, Mark Dytor, opens the WEETR and highlights AECI Mining Solutions vision for the future
Case Studies AEL partners with customer in order to add value to their operations. We listen, analyse and understand the challenges of the customer and deliver to the required level of requirement using the right product mix, optimised delivery systems and a team of experts that are focused to deliver value. We proudly present our wining case study at the WEETR entitled AEL achieves required cost savings at Assmang Khumani Iron Ore Mine, presented by Robert Erasmus, Field Services Superintendent Assmang who will be presenting this case study at the ISEE 43rd Annual Conference on Explosives and Blasting Technique to be held in early 2017 in Orlando, Florida. (See page 6)
Blasting News I Second Quarter 2016
2016 P ROD CATAL UCT OGUE Versio n3
Stope Blasting Handbook Version 1.1 I 2016
5
AEL ACHIEVES REQUIRED COST SAVINGS AT ASSMANG KHUMANI IRON ORE MINE CASE STUDY
CONTACT Robert Erasmus Field Services Superintendent Assmang +27 27 82 739 6470 robert.erasmus@aelms.com AEL MINING SERVICES 1 Platinum Drive, Longmeadow Business Estate North, Modderfontein, 1645, South Africa www.aelminingservices.com
CASE STUDY
Total saving each month on drilling and explosives at Bruce Mine.
CONTACT Robert Erasmus Field Services Superintendent Assmang +27 27 82 739 6470 robert.erasmus@aelms.com
BUSINESS CHALLENGE AEL in the Northern Cape was awarded the Assmang Khumani contract in May 2015. At the time of the tender the mine requested that ore be delivered in a “lumpy” form as they were experiencing significant losses due to fine ore. It was identified from the start of the contract that the Burden and Spacing parameters were too small. Initially, the Ore burden and spacing parameters were 3.5m x 4m, and in the Waste 3.5m x 3.75m. These parameters in conjunction with AEL’s doped emulsion initially resulted in the ore being blasted too fine which indicated an increase in the burden and spacing parameters was necessary. The previous explosives supplier had attempted to increase burden and spacing but had been unsuccessful in achieving the required fragmentation, therefore the expectation from Khumani for AEL to be successful was high.
AEL MINING SERVICES 1 Platinum Drive, Longmeadow Business Estate North, Modderfontein, 1645, South Africa www.aelminingservices.com
Over the period from July 2015 till March 2016 (9 months) AEL have saved King Mine a total of approximately R102 million. R32 million of this was on explosives, and R69 million on drilling. Total saving each month on drilling and explosives at King Mine.
The main challenge that AEL faced was the decrease in the Iron Ore price, resulting in a Section 189 being implemented on the mine. This required drastic cost reductions specifically in the drilling and blasting operations.
SOLUTION This equates to a total saving of about R158 million over a period of 9 months for Assmang Khumani Iron Ore and is an on-going cost saving.
AEL started the optimisation process at Bruce Mine in July 2015, by increasing the burden and spacing parameters in 0.5m increments. AEL carried out quality measurements on each bench/block to ensure that all the holes were drilled according to plan and at the correct burden and spacing. This resulted in fewer drilled holes with the increased burden and spacing parameters that were identified in this process. The optimal burden and spacing parameters for Bruce Mine were finalised at 4.0m x 5.0m in the ore and 5.0m x 6.0m in the waste using SP235 Eco. The same process was then followed at King Mine, where the final optimal burden and spacing parameters were finalised at 4.0m x 4.5m in the ore and 5.0m x 6.0m in the waste using SP235 Eco.
Digging, loading and hauling was more efficient due to the “lumpy” fragmented rock. Optimum fragmentation leads to more cost saving, this cost includes the reduction in fuel for moving the fragmented rock and also an improved efficiency on the crushers and mills. Due to the improved fragmentation (more uniform and less oversize), more efficient loading with fewer haul trucks was realised. Due to contractual negotiations still in progress, a Rand based saving cannot be specified at this time, but a potential bonus pay out from Khumani to AEL may be granted when the contract has been finalised and signed.
In March 2016 the sub-drill at Bruce Mine was reduced to zero as it had been identified that the geology did not require sub-drill for good floor conditions. This would result in significant savings in drilling costs. Following a month of trial blasting with zero sub-drill, Bruce Mine signed off on satisfactory floor conditions and is happy to continue with no sub-drill at this mine. The following step is to implement a similar project at King Mine.
NEXT STEPS Change the down-the-hole product and/or timing to improve the fragmentation quality to the mean size that the client requires.
OUTCOME Over the period from July 2015 till March 2016 (9 months) AEL saved Bruce Mine a total in excess of R56 million which encompasses saving in explosives as well as drilling.
6
Blasting News I Second Quarter 2016
Blasting News I Second Quarter 2016
7
AEL INTERNATIONAL
AEL INTERNATIONAL
AEL expands South American base explosives and specialty chemicals
AEL aims to increase its supply of
manufacturer AECI, it is important,
electronic blasting systems and bulk
specifically because of the continent’s
explosives to South American markets,
stability, its status as a major mining
particularly those of Brazil and Chile,
destination and the potential for new
where safety is the main issue for
mining projects even under the current
customers. Kwenda adds that the
environment of depressed commodity
company will also expand its on-site
prices.
technical support to maintain the highest safety standards and optimise
He cites the Brazilian mining industry,
mining operations for its customers.
which has remained competitive
a
end w K s i Alo
despite the fall of commodities prices
“Mining operations are looking
and the slowing global economy. Other
for suppliers that not only deliver
South American mining industries
products but that can also come up
have displayed similar resilience,
with solutions that increase their
which, in conjunction with the vast
operational efficiency, which we can
mineral deposits throughout the
achieve using our suite of explosives,
continent, is indicative of significant
blast initiating systems and technical
business opportunity, he adds.
support through blast optimisation teams.”
Demonstrations, which focus specifically on electronic blasting systems, have been
Kwenda says growing AEL’s previously
AEL has increased its presence in South America, owing to the nature and resilience of the South American mining industry.
established base in South America
Kwenda comments that the company’s
through direct interaction with
expansion in South America has
customers is integral to the company’s
exceeded expectations, with it having
global expansion strategy. Such
participated in several tenders
interaction has been characterised
and conducting demonstrations
by increased attendance at South
of electronic blasting systems for
American mining exhibitions and
potential customers.
events, as well as several meetings with potential clients.
AEL GM for business development in
To date, AEL has performed two blasting demonstrations for copper
South America and West Central Africa
AEL has previously supplied customers
mining clients in Chile and expects to
Alois Kwenda notes that, although
on the continent using distributors and
conduct two more next month. Kwenda
South America is a relatively new
other agents, but decided last year
notes that the demonstrations, which
market (compared with Africa where
to offer its full suite of products and
focus specifically on electronic blasting
the company was first established
technical expertise directly to ensure
systems, have been successful, as
more than a century ago and the Asia
high-quality supply and more efficient
they have led to renewed interest from
Pacific region, where the company
application of explosives on site, he
stakeholders in Chile and securing
has been established for a decade)
explains.
new clients.
for AEL and its parent company
8
Blasting News I Second Quarter 2016
successful AEL field technicians on bench
AEL has consolidated its offices under
second year, is a mining exhibition and
International Mining Exhibition 2015
the AECI brand in South America;
conference for Latin America, attended
from September 14 to 17. The annual
therefore, the sales and distribution
by about 80 000 visitors and including
event was held in Belo Horizonte,
offices in Brazil and Chile trade under
exhibitions from 1 700 companies.
Brazil, and attracted more than 50 000
the AECI name. AECI Mining Solutions
Kwenda notes that even though
visitors.
brings together the group’s expertise
attendance had decreased this year
in the supply of products and services
due to global economic conditions, the
According to Kwenda the company
for customers in the mining sector.
quality of customer interaction was
intends to establish manufacturing
still significant, with many customers
operations in either Chile or Brazil
Kwenda and his team recently
and potential customers visiting the
within the next five years.
exhibited as part of AECI Mining
stalls and asking for meetings.
Solutions at the Expomin 2016 event, held in Santiago, Chile, from April 25 to
AEL under the AECI Mining Solutions
29. The event, which takes place every
banner, also exhibited at Exposibram
Blasting News I Second Quarter 2016
9
AEL TECHNICAL CAPABILITY
AEL TECHNICAL CAPABILITY
Check twice, blast once: The importance of blasthole monitoring by Manare Mokoatlo ‘Measure twice and cut once’ is an old adage that every person who works with their hands has heard countless times, usually dispensed by their mentor as they learn the ins and outs of their craft. The learnings behind this phrase are to avoid having to duplicate your efforts, save time and eliminate any possibility of error in your results. In the world of mining operations – where every cubic millimetre of ore and every second of uptime counts – this is especially true. However, some operations are failing to meet their potential by allowing poorly drilled blastholes to force them into duplicating blasts unnecessarily and ultimately hampering production in the long run. It is crucial that mines
measure twice, and blast once. Blasthole surveying is a key part of blast planning and blast optimisation. These two processes are vital in ensuring that every blast goes off without a hitch, that the optimal amount and type of explosives are used and that the right results are achieved. When drilling blastholes, there are a number of technical and geological factors that can lead to an undesirable drilling pattern. From a technical aspect, excessive drilling and the use of worn out drill bits can lead to errors in blasthole structures while rock types and ground water can lead to drilling deviations. Deviations lead to poor blast results, low productivity, safety risks and
environmental impacts. Blasthole surveying can identify drilling deviations as well as burden lengths and drilling depths. This is crucial to operations because a small burden length can result in too much rock being blasted from the bench face while too long a length results in the explosive energy coming back up the blasthole.
Manare Mokoatlo presenting on blast hole monitoring at the IOQ conference
Borehole callipher log for measuring diameter deviations
Poor drilling practices
Hole being measured for depth
Poor fragmentation as a result of poor blast preparation
Blast hole angle deviation surveying
Using Boretrak™ equipment, for example, operations can check these factors as well as calculate drilling deviation from the design at fixed intervals. Boretrak™ comprises a control display unit (CDU) logger, a rack of rods, a probe and a gyroscope or gravity sensors. All of this equipment feeds into an interface which can represent the status of a
drillhole, removing all guesswork from blast planning. Other equipment which is crucial in checking drillholes is borehole calliper logs, which comprise a tripod with a probe on a pulley which is lowered into the hole. The probe is equipped with arms that can open out on command to measure the average diameter and average variance of the drillhole. In an ideal world, the hole should resemble a cylindrical tube – with smooth walls and an equal diameter throughout. In reality, however, there are often deviations. By measuring these deviations with the probe, blasting teams can determine the optimal amount and type of explosives that each unique hole requires or if the hole needs slight drilling adjustments. A well planned and successfully executed blast has several benefits. It can deliver operation-specific fragmentation levels that result in improved productivity
BoretrackTM in action 10
Blasting News I Second Quarter 2016
Blasting News I Second Quarter 2016
and removing the need for secondary blasts. This is because the correct level of fragmentation reduces the levels of loading and hauling, and optimises plant operations by making processes such as crushing more efficient. A successful blast also improves safety because it reduces the amount of flyrock, while its environmental benefits include meeting airblast and ground vibration limits. While the information that surveying provides is crucial, it is what operations do with it that really counts. Through thorough measurement and analysis, AEL can help operations take corrective actions to reduce downtime and unnecessary secondary blasts. By ‘measuring twice and blasting once’, mines can reap the financial and operational rewards of thorough planning and measurement. 11
circles for effective fragmentation to occur. Figure 2 contrasts the arrangement of square drilling patterns with that of staggered
EXPLOSIVES TODAY
drilling patterns, for a Spacing/ Burden (S/B) ratio of 1.25:1. Figure 1. Gas pressure and crack extension
The staggered pattern produces a more uniform distribution of fracture circles and thus more even fragmentation in the rockpile for the same powder factor. In fact, optimum coverage is
Series 4 I No 15
obtained when the holes form equilateral triangles, but as can be seen from table 1 this pattern varies only slightly in coverage from the staggered patterns based on S/B ratios of between 1.0 and 1.5.
BLASTHOLE DRILLING AND INITIATION PATTERNS IN SURFACE BLASTING Part 1 By Henk Esterhuizen – Senior Mining Engineer
Figure 2. Bench coverage by blasthole fracture circles assuming constant powder factor and S/B ratio = 1.25 - Note: In the square pattern unfractured areas and excessive overlap between circles; In the staggered pattern, total bench coverage
Implications of Drilling Pattern The greatest potential for good breaking with the most extended
The layout of the drill holes, burden and spacing and ratio between them have an important effect on blasting results. In this issue a theme will be developed with particular reference to blasthole drilling and initiation patterns. In order to understand the significance of these patterns however, one of the basic mechanisms of rock fracture by explosives must be briefly considered. 12 12
Radial Fracture Under Gas Pressure
drilling pattern thus lies in using
other hand, promotes the formation
a staggered pattern having an
of longer cracks hence a greater When blastholes are fired
diameter plug of fractured ground,
independently a cylindrical ‘plug’ of
accompanied by minimal heave. The
broken ground is created around each
optimum burden is that which results
hole before movement of the burden
in a maximum of ground being broken
takes place. The diameter of this
and heaved into a rockpile loose
‘plug’ is determined by the pressure
enough to be handled by the available
of the explosives gases and the
loading equipment.
S/B ratio of between 1.0 and 1.5. The square layouts all give significantly less coverage. Note that if the S/B ratio increases beyond 2, the radial fractures reach the free face before Figure 3. Interaction of stresses from closely spaced blastholes fired simultaneously
result pressure is released earlier
time for which they act in the radial cracks and fissures to the free face as
Blasthole Drilling Patterns
illustrated in steps 1 to 4 in figure 1. Seen in plan on the surface of the
becoming fully developed. As a
Table 1: Effect of drilling patterns and S/B ratios on area covered by fracture circles. Equilateral triangular layout = 100%
resulting in a smaller diameter fractured area and more flyrock.
S/B Ratio
Square pattern %
Staggered pattern %
There can therefore be little
1.00
77
98.5
benefit in exceeding an S/B ratio
1.15 Δ
76
100
of 1.5.
1.25
75
99.5
If the burden is small the gas is
bench, the fractured areas around
released very quickly and its unused
the blastholes can be represented as
energy is spent in heaving the
circles. It is logical to assume that
1.50
71
94.6
broken burden forward with great
every point on the surface must fall
Real as the benefits of staggered
2.00
62
77.0
momentum. A large burden, on the
within at least one of these fracture
patterns may be, they are less
Blasting News News II Second Second Quarter Quarter 2016 2016 Blasting
Note: Δ, equilateral triangle Blasting News News II Second Second Quarter Quarter 2016 2016 Blasting
evident in highly fractured 13 13
Single row fired with excess time
ground where the fracture
delay
planes seriously hamper the
•
broken rock buffer.
possible result as can be seen in
Lower ground vibrations and
figure 5.
airblast than the instantaneous
development of radial fractures. If a single row of similar blastholes is
single hole blast, because energy
blastholes in high benches,
detonated in sequence with relatively
release and ground movement
drilling inaccuracy and hole
long time delay (e.g. several seconds)
are spread over a longer period
between successive detonations,
of time. Ground vibrations may be
the result will be different again as
higher than the single hole blast,
Identifying the right intra-row delay is
illustrated in figure 4.
because of the restraining effects
one of the key factors to predictable
of the broken rock buffer.
and efficient blasting. For a brittle,
Also, with small diameter
deviation can result in the pattern
Figure 4. Interaction of stresses from closely spaced blastholes fired with excess time delay
at the toe being unrelated to the laid out pattern on the bench. In these conditions, therefore, the merits of staggered patterns may
In general, this type of blast would
be outweighed by the convenience
produce:
of drilling square patterns. Blasthole Initiation Patterns
• Figure 5. Interaction of stresses from closely spaced blastholes fired with optimal time delay
“Initiation” Burden and Spacing Spacing delay
elastic, homogeneous rock type, a short intra-row delay is usually
Better fragmentation than
Single row firing with optimal time
appropriate. In contrast, a porous,
the instantaneous single row
delay
plastic, highly jointed rock mass
blast, as cracks between
would require more time between
blastholes would not tend to
Alternatively, a single row of similar
of production blasts can be
link up preferentially. However,
blastholes could be fired in sequence
controlled by altering delay
fragmentation may be poorer
with a relatively small time (e.g.
Short delays promote a united effort
than the single hole blast
several milliseconds) between
between adjacent blastholes, tending
because there is no positive
adjacent detonations. In general, a
to maximise forward displacement
interaction between adjacent
delay interval of a few milliseconds
at the expense of fragmentation and
blastholes, and earlier-firing
per metre of spacing between
vibration levels. Long delays tend
charges may disrupt adjacent
adjacent blastholes will produce quite
to make each blasthole work more
explosives charges or the rock
different results compared to the
independently, reducing positive
mass surrounding them.
previous examples.
interaction.
the single hole or simultaneous
Optimal time delay is known as intra-
Results from a wide range of
single row blasts, as the rock
row delay, the essential difference
conditions indicate that the
displaced by the first holes
is that each blast hole charge is
appropriate intra-row delay for
to fire will come to rest and
detonated whilst the surrounding
conventional blasting is usually less
become a buffer which restrains
rock mass is pre-stressed but not
than 5 milliseconds per metre of
subsequent burden movement.
completely disrupted by the effects of
burden (as measured between rows
The opening of cracks from
earlier-firing charges.
of holes). The ideal delay for each
The overall performance
timing to vary the degree of interaction between adjacent blastholes. Whilst absolute values of inter-row and intra-row delays are important, the ratio of these times is also significant. This can be explained by the •
following concepts (which are over-simplifications of a complex subject). •
The intra-row delay controls interaction between adjacent blastholes and determines whether blastholes act independently or together.
•
The inter-row delay controls interaction between dependent blastholes, as it affects the progressive creation of new effective free faces during the blast.
•
The ratio of inter-row delay to intra-row delay controls the
14 14
Figure 6. Squared and staggered V-cut chevron patterns
geometry and orientation of new
muckpile shape and position.
free faces created as the blast
This is sometimes referred to
progresses. For a later-firing
as the apparent direction of
blasthole, the location, shape
movement of a blasthole or the
and extent of any effective free
overall blast.
face will depend on this ratio the direction and extent of displacement of the burden of each blasthole and thus the final
Blasting News News II Second Second Quarter Quarter 2016 2016 Blasting
Less forward movement than
earlier-firing charges may
•
of delay times. This influences
detonation of adjacent blastholes.
situation is clearly influenced by rock
also permit premature venting
Adjacent blastholes thus interact
properties, blast geometry and the
of gases from subsequent
positively, producing superior results
desired result, but 3 to 6 milliseconds
detonations.
because the explosives energy is
per metre of burden is recommended.
Less overbreak than the
released in a controlled manner
instantaneous row of blastholes,
and applied to the rock mass more
but more than the single
effectively. In fact, for any pair of
hole blast because forward
blastholes there is a unique delay
Fragmentation will be enhanced,
displacement is restrained by the
time which will produce the best
particularly in the toe region of
Blasting News News II Second Second Quarter Quarter 2016 2016 Blasting
Burden delay
15 15
blastholes towards the perimeter of
up in terms of visualising the correct
•
Explosives
damages that may be suffered, as a
the blast. The correct inter-row delay
initiation routes. Figure 6 illustrates
–
Characteristics, degree of
result of a party acting, or failing to act,
ensures that each blast hole has an
the difference between a squared and
coupling and decking
on the advice and/or recommendations
effective free face to break towards,
staggered V-cut chevron patterns.
•
Initiation system
given by AEL;1.4 accept liability for any
–
Surface or in-hole delays and
acts or omissions of its employees.
type of downline
Representatives and/or agents, whether
because preceding blastholes have broken and detached their burdens before
If we consider a square pattern of holes
the next dependent blast hole fires. This
as depicted in figure 6, it is evident that
•
Environmental constraints
progressive relief of burden during the
several different chevrons can be drawn
–
blast will affect the volume of oversize
through the pattern.
frequency
rock produced, although fragmentation
Air, ground vibration levels and
•
The desired result –
is often influenced more by the intra-row
Considering a single front row hole, the
delay than by the inter-row delay.
chevron which intersects the nearest hole
Fragmentation, muckpile displacement and final profile
in the next row, i.e. the hole immediately Results from a wide range of conditions
behind, defines the “VO” chevron. If the
We will develop this concept in future
indicate that the appropriate inter-row
angle of the chevron is flattened so that
editions of Explosives Today. AEL Mining
delay for conventional blasting is usually
it extends through the next nearest hole,
Services Explosives Engineers based at
less than 18 milliseconds (measured
this defines the “V1” chevron, and so on,
the regional offices are available to help
between rows of holes) but 12 – 18
figure 7.
and advise on this subject and the use
milliseconds per metre of burden is
of electronic detonators to achieve all
recommended for initial trials.
Chevrons through staggered hole
controlled blasting scenarios.
patterns are similarly defined but Ground and air vibrations are minimised
Figure 7. Chevron initiation patterns
References:
sideways distance is increased by half
similar to a single row blast. This is
the spacing. Figure 8 illustrates the
a direct result of progressive relief of
difference between a squared “V2”
This document is a new addition to the
burden during the blast, which promotes
chevron and a more flatter staggered
Explosives Today series. This document
lateral movement and minimises uplift,
“V2”chevron pattern.
replaces all previous Explosives Today
cratering and stemming ejection.
on this subject including Series 2. No 12:
Subsequent blasts are also likely to
Factors which influence the timing of a
have less potential for airblast because
blast
reduced overbreak means that front row
June 1978 Disclaimer: Any advice and/or
burden rock contains minimum cracking
Several factors which have a direct
recommendations given by AEL
from the previous blast.
influence on timing which should be
Mining Services Limited (“AEL”) in this
considered are:
publication, is given by AEL in good
Open or Closed
faith in order to provide assistance to
Figure 8. Squared and staggered V2-cut chevron patterns
•
Rock properties
the reader. AEL does not however: 1.1
– Strength, Young’s modulus,
warrant the correctness of its advice
chevron pattern causes the rock pile to
Open chevron patterns yield flatter, evenly
be concentrated in a central position, and
spread rock piles, that are well suited to
Chevron patterns are classed as ‘Open’
may provide a small bonus in terms of
front-end loaders. They also avoid the
structure
that particular results or effects will
or ‘Closed’ depending on whether it
fragmentation, owing to impacts between
possibility of a toe problem posed by the
•
Blast geometry
be achieved if AEL’s advice and/or
is desired to take V-cut in the bench
rocks projected from opposing echelons.
tighter breaking conditions of closed
–
Burden, spacing, bench height
recommendations are implemented;
patterns, and are rather easier to connect
and available free faces
1.3 accept liability for any losses or
or blast to two free faces. The closed
16
Copyright: All copyright that subsists in this publication together with any and all diagrams and annexures contained herein, which shall include all and/or any ideas, plans, models and/or intellectual property contained in this document vests in AEL. Any unauthorised reproduction, adaptation, alteration, translation, publication, distribution or dissemination (including, but not limited to, broadcasting and causing the work to be transmitted in a diffusion service) of the whole or any part of this document in any manner, form or medium (including, but not limited to, electronic, oral, aural, visual and tactile media) whatsoever, will constitute an act of copyright infringement in terms of the Copyright Act No.98 of 1978 and will render the transgressor liable to civil action and may in certain circumstances render the transgressor liable to criminal prosecution. This document remains the intellectual property of AEL. Intellectual Property: All ideas, concepts, know-how and designs forming part of this publication belong to AEL, save for where it is clearly indicated to the contrary.
look rather flatter, as in each case the
and can often be maintained at levels
Types and Features of Chevron Patterns
negligent or otherwise.
Blasting News I Second Quarter 2016
density, porosity and rock
Blasting News I Second Quarter 2016
and/or recommendations; 1.2 warrant
17
AEL IN THE FIELD
AEL PAYING IT FORWARD
AECI showcases at ExpoMin 2016
AEL partners with Northam Rhinos AEL is proud to have partnered with Northam Rhinos rugby team
Expomin has become a benchmark
For AECI this was a great opportunity
AECI team took this opportunity to
event for the Latin American mining
to promote our brand and the new
strengthen the relationship with
for several years. The team won
industry. The event allows industry
concept of AECI Mining Solutions in
current and potential customers
the Assupol Tournament in March
to focus on the widest range of
the South America mining industry.
during this event.
2016 at Loftus Versfeld Stadium
technological innovation while bringing
Additionally, being an exhibitor
together the mining sector’s key
reinforces our commitment to the
The AEL Latin America team
players. After 12 exhibitions since
region and builds confidence, in a
present at the event included
1990, it has become the largest
very conservative market, that we are
Alois Kwenda, General Manager
mining event in South America and a
committed about supplying Chilean
Business Development – LATAM &
worldwide benchmark event.
customers with explosives and
Central Africa; Alejandro Contreras,
The club boasts players employed
chemicals for mining.
Operations Manager – AECI
by the mines in the area as
enabling them to qualify for the Community Cup which will be a widely televised event.
Latam; Ignacio Humeres, Business
well as players from the local
80,000 professional, and more than
The AECI stand was visited by a host
Development Manager and Carlos
communities. Some highlights
1,700 enterprising suppliers from 36
of conference delegates, who sourced
Cammás, Financial Manager Latam.
countries around the world.
information about the company. The
include the team winning the
Expomin 2016 received more than
2015 Assupol Tournament (Blue Bulls Rugby Union), the 2015 Waterberg League, 2015 Limpopo Club Championships and the 2016 Assupol Tournament (Blue Bulls Rugby Union). As a result of being the 2015 Limpopo Champions, the team will represent Limpopo Blue Bulls Rugby Union in the Gold Cup Tournament (previously called the Cell C Community Cup) in September this year. This is a prestigious national tournament for the top 20 teams in the country. We wish them all the best to bring home the title!
The fully equipped interactive exhibition stand 18
Blasting News I Second Quarter 2016
Blasting News I Second Quarter 2016
19